This invention relates to the sealing of holes in walls, where said wall is a barrier between regions of differing pressure, e.g. a breach in a ship's hull, by the use of an elastomeric apparatus.
In any pressurised vessel, the wall of the vessel represents a barrier between a region of relative high pressure and a region of relative low pressure. If the wall becomes breached there is typically a rapid transit of material through said breach as the two regions regain equilibrium.
This can have disastrous consequences, particularly in the field of boats and submarines where the transitting material is fluid (e.g. seawater) and can result in the vessel sinking. Submarines are of particular concern, as the water pressure increases with depth and gives a higher differential between the areas of relative high and low pressure, and this increases the rate of fluid transit in the event of a breach. Consequently, breaches must be repaired with urgency.
Presently, as is known in the art, breaches may be repaired temporarily with a set of bungs or dowels. Typically, the set of bungs are formed of wood or a plastics material with the bungs being of varying sizes to repair correspondingly sized breaches. When a bung is inserted into the breach, access to the hole is blocked and so for a full repair the vessel must be removed from the water (dry-docked) and the bung can be safely removed and the hole repaired.
Clearly, this known method of repairing breaches has a number of drawbacks. Firstly, a number of bungs must be carried on the vessel to accommodate different sizes of breach, which is inconvenient and can prevent the repairing of a second breach if the appropriately sized bung is already being used to repair a first breach. A given bung may only be used to repair a hole that closely matches the size of that particular bung. Having a plug that can be used to repair holes of various sizes would overcome this drawback.
Additionally, the bungs block access to the damaged area in use. This has the drawback that a full repair must be postponed until the vessel makes it back to the dock. This is risky, as bungs are held in place with mechanical force, and only friction prevents the bung from being pushed out of the hole. Consequently, bungs can fail if they are left in the breach for an extended period. Also, often a bung must be hammered into a breach to ensure a snug fit. This can put stresses on fault lines surrounding the breach, weakening these areas and risking failure of hull integrity. It would be beneficial to provide a plug that continues to provide access to the hole for repair in use. It would also be beneficial to provide a plug that does not require hammering to remain in place.
Other prior art apparatuses comprise ‘umbrella’-type plugs, such as those disclosed in GB2432562, GB2217591 and GB1450861. These comprise sealing members which are inserted through the hole in a collapsed state and then expanded over the hole by the action of support struts, the sealing means then being clamped over the hole. These devices may be inserted through the hole from the region of relative low pressure, however to withdraw them back requires the sealing means to be collapsed again, which is not always feasible. Damage to a support strut can cause the sealing means to be locked in an expanded state, making the apparatus irretrievable through the hole. Said umbrella-type plugs also have the drawback that they rely on mechanical operating mechanisms to expand the sealing member—see, for example FIG. 2 of GB2432562, FIG. 5 of GB2217591, and FIG. 1 of GB1450861. If the operating mechanism fails the sealing member may cease to prevent the transit of material through the hole. This means that these types of plug have a risk of structural failure (a breach in the sealing member itself), plus an additional risk of mechanical failure. These umbrella-type plugs also suffer from the drawback that they must be installed with two hands: one to hold the plug and one to operate the mechanism. This can be a difficult operation to perform in confined spaces where access to the hole is restricted. It would be beneficial to provide a plug that can be inserted into, and retracted from, a hole with one hand.
As other prior art may be mentioned, DE20204880U, DE19957445, FR2574890, SU1110718, FR2259009 and US5845 all disclose various known apparatuses for sealing holes in walls which divide a region of relative high pressure from a region of relative low pressure.
The present invention aims to provide a sealing apparatus capable of overcoming the aforementioned drawbacks.
According to the present invention from one aspect, there is provided an apparatus for sealing a hole in a wall, the wall in use dividing a region of relative high pressure from a region of relative low pressure, the apparatus comprising an elongate stem connected at one Send to a sealing member which extends substantially radially from the major axis of said stem in an extended state such that, in use, said relative high pressure acts to seal the sealing member in the extended state against the wall, wherein said sealing member is resiliently deformable from said extended state into a collapsed state in which the sealing member is folded towards the stem, and into an everted state in which the sealing means is folded away from the stem.
The sealing member may optionally when in its extended state form a dome shape, which may act to maintain an air gap around the hole in use. Optionally, the stem portion could comprise strengthening rods. The stem portion could comprise a retaining means.
The sealing member and stem may be moulded as one piece.
A kit of parts comprising a plurality of such apparatuses is also claimed.
According to the invention from another aspect, there is provided a method of sealing a hole in the wall which divides a region of relative high pressure from a region of relative low pressure comprising the steps of:
The sealing member may optionally when in its extended state form a dome shape, which may act to maintain an air gap around the hole in use. Optionally, the stem portion could comprise strengthening rods. The stem portion could comprise a retaining means.
The sealing member and stem may be moulded as one piece.
The method may comprise the further step of performing a repair operation on the hole between the steps of inserting the sealing member and removing the sealing member.
The insertion step may comprise pushing the stem from the region of relative low pressure towards the region of relative high pressure. The removal step may comprises pulling the stem from the region of relative high pressure towards the region of relative low pressure. Either of the insertion or removal steps, or both, may be performed with a force provided by an explosive charge or hydraulic ram.
The method may comprise the further steps of providing one or more additional sealing apparatuses, each sealing apparatus comprising a stem connected at one end to a sealing member which extends substantially radially from the major axis of said stem in an extended state, wherein said sealing member is resiliently deformable from said extended state into a collapsed state in which the sealing member is folded towards the stem, and into an everted state in which the sealing means is folded away from the stem; inserting the sealing member of each additional sealing apparatus through the hole in its collapsed state until the sealing member clears the hole and reverts to its extended state, said relative high pressure acting to seal the sealing member in its extended state against the wall; and removing the sealing member of each additional sealing apparatus through the hole in its everted state.
In each embodiment of
In any of the embodiments shown in
The above described embodiment is exemplary only, and other possibilities will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, although the above embodiment is primarily directed towards repairing holes in ships, it could be used in any applications which involve pressurised vessels, such as domestic boilers, tankers containing pressurised fluids, etc.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1212318.8 | Jul 2012 | GB | national |
1308192.2 | May 2013 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2013/051818 | 7/10/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/009719 | 1/16/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5845 | Seely | Oct 1848 | A |
503079 | Gowen | Aug 1893 | A |
1411560 | Beaty | Apr 1922 | A |
2220085 | Dirschel | Nov 1940 | A |
2476601 | Harper | Jul 1949 | A |
4385582 | Fuerst | May 1983 | A |
20150166154 | Ford | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1245786 | Jul 1967 | DE |
19957445 | May 2001 | DE |
20204880 | Sep 2002 | DE |
0335747 | Oct 1989 | EP |
2259009 | Jan 1974 | FR |
2574890 | Jun 1986 | FR |
1450861 | Sep 1976 | GB |
2432562 | May 2007 | GB |
1110718 | Aug 1984 | SU |
Entry |
---|
IPO Search & Exam Report, dated Oct. 8, 2012 for GB1212318.8. |
PCT International Search Report, Oct. 21, 2013. |
IPO Search & Exam Report, dated May 20, 2013 for GB1308192.2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150166154 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |