The present invention relates to the depletion of the ozone in the atmosphere and, more particularly, to the destruction of ozone depleting substances.
The Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) has reviewed and approved a total of twelve technologies for the destruction of ozone depleting substances (ODS) [1]. For descriptive purposes, these approved technologies can be broadly classified as incineration technologies, plasma technologies including arc and radio frequency plasma, and other non-incineration technologies [1]. The most widely used current practice, both by ODS processing rate and by the number of processing units, for destruction of ODS is either by incineration or by argon plasma technology [1-2]. Both technologies use thermal oxidation as the main mechanism of destruction. ODS are fed into refractory lined reactors, which are heated to high temperatures in the order of 1200° C. Incinerators use fossil fuel-fired burners to achieve the necessary high temperatures, whereas argon plasma arc is used in the case of argon plasma technology [2-5].
As ODS are inherently fire inhibitors, extreme process conditions are needed for their destruction. Incinerators require large quantities of fossil fuels to achieve the high temperature necessary for ODS destruction. Ozone depleting substances are fed into the high temperature zone of the incinerators in relatively small quantities along with air or oxygen [2-5]. Often these incinerators do not have secondary combustion chambers and the off gases generated are simply diluted, before emitting to the atmosphere. Consequently, these incinerators require large quantities of fossil fuels to destroy small quantities of ODS, generate large quantities of flue gases containing significant amount of Cl2, F2, NOX, SOX, VOC, which are hard to remove from the flue gases [2-5]. Also, incineration processes pose a very high potential of emitting toxic products of incomplete combustion, such as dioxins and furans [6].
Plasma destruction technologies use argon, nitrogen or CO2 as the plasma forming medium to transfer energy from an electric arc into high destruction temperatures [4, 7-10]. These technologies still use thermal oxidation as their main destruction method. Direct current plasma torches are used to heat the refractory lined reactors to high destruction temperatures. ODS, air and steam are introduced into the destruction zone and the ODS are combusted. The primary destruction mechanism in these systems is still thermal oxidation and hence has similar problems such as production of Cl2, F2 and CF4, which are hard to remove from the flue gas. In these processes, the presence of excess oxygen and air in the high temperature zone still poses the potential formation of NOx, whereas operating at diminished oxygen levels lead to formation of soot, which is hard to remove. Argon plasma technology requires high flow rates of high purity argon, which makes it expensive to use.
Therefore, there is a need in the art for an improved technology for the destruction of ozone depleting substances.
It is therefore an aim of the present invention to provide a novel system for destroying ozone depleting substances.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a two step process for the destruction of a precursor material using steam plasma in a reactor, wherein the precursor material is hydrolyzed as a first step in a high temperature zone of the reactor, followed by a second step of medium temperature oxidation of the reactant stream in a combustion zone of the reactor where combustion oxygen or air is injected and immediate quenching of the resulting gas stream to avoid the formation of unwanted by-products.
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for carrying out the above process, including a non transferred direct current steam plasma torch, an externally cooled three zone steam plasma reactor including a corrosive resistant refractory lining, means for attaching the plasma torch to the reactor, means for introducing the precursor material in the form of gas vortex or fine liquid spray or solid particles into the plasma plume of the plasma torch, means for introducing the combustion air or oxygen into the combustion zone of the reactor, means for exiting the reactant mixture from the reactor and means for quenching the reactant mixture located at the exit end of the reactor.
Further in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for the destruction of a precursor material, comprising a reactor including a high temperature zone and a combustion zone, the high temperature zone being adapted for hydrolyzing the precursor material, the combustion zone being adapted to effect medium temperature oxidation of the reactant stream where combustion oxygen or air is injected, and a quenching means is provided at an exit end of the reactor for quenching of the resulting gas stream to avoid the formation of unwanted by-products.
Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reading of the following non-restrictive description of embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, showing by way of illustration an illustrative embodiment of the present invention, and in which:
The present invention uses a steam plasma hydrolysis system S for the destruction of ODS. The main mechanism of destruction in this invention is the plasma steam hydrolysis. In this system, a custom designed steam plasma torch is used as the sole source of energy to heat the refractory lined primary reaction chamber to temperatures close to 1500° C. Superheated steam formed from regular water is used as the main plasma forming gas, along with a small quantity of inert gas. Highly reactive steam plasma, i.e. hydrogen and hydroxyl ions present in the steam plasma, are used to convert the ODS into CO, HCl and HF, in an oxygen starved environment. The produced CO is combusted downstream in the process followed by an instantaneous water quench. Oxygen starved environment eliminates the formation of toxic substances such as Cl2, F2 and CF4 and a rapid quench eliminates the formation of dioxins and furans. The acid gases formed in the process can either (i) be neutralized with an alkali or (ii) first scrubbed with water to recover a weak acid mixture and then neutralized for the unrecoverable portion of the acid gases. In both cases, a cleaned effluent gas stream comprising mainly CO2 is emitted to the atmosphere.
Now turning to the figures of the appended drawings, the present steam plasma hydrolysis system S will be described in more details.
A precursor material 1 is injected, either in the form of a gas vortex or a fine spray of liquid or a stream of solids, into the system S as shown in
An outside heating source, typically a steam plasma torch 4, is used as the source for heating the refractory lined reactor to a temperature of 1500° C. The plasma torch 4 is designed and built with features, to avoid condensation of the superheated steam inside the torch before reaching the plasma arc. These features of the plasma torch include, (i) direct injection 3 of the main plasma forming gas, superheated steam, to the torch vortex so that it does not condense on its way to the arc plume and minimizing superheated steam passage inside the torch body; (ii) cooling of the plasma torch body with a hot fluid (propylene glycol-water mixture), circulating in a high pressure closed loop, to avoid superheated steam condensation; and (iii) use of high temperature resistant polymers such as Vespel™ or PEEK for torch internal components.
The steam plasma torch 4 includes a metallic cathode 2, a metallic ignition anode 6 and a metallic working anode 8, which are arranged as shown in
The steam plasma torch 4, in-addition to acting as a heat source, provides reactive oxygen, hydroxyl and hydrogen ions necessary for the destruction of the precursor material 1 and prevents the formation of undesired side products, such as Cl2, F2, CFx. The overall reaction can be summarized as:
CHxClyFz+aH2O→zHF+yHCl+aCO+bH2+cH2O
A refractory lined reactor 14 is used to destroy the precursor material 1. A corrosion resistant high durable refractory lining 16 is used as the working refractory in the reactor 14. For example, a high alumina refractory (>98% alumina content), such as Kricon 34™ or similar which is known to resist to corrosive HF and HCl gases, is used as the working refractory.
The internal walls of the reactor 14 are coated with acid resistant high temperature metallic coating such as Hastealloy™ or similar. The external walls of the reactor 14 are cooled externally, either by air or by water, for safety reasons and to limit heating of the furnace room.
The refractory lined reactor 14 comprises of three zones, as shown in
1) a conical converging, high temperature, steam hydrolysis zone 11, wherein the fed precursor material 1 undergoes steam hydrolysis;
2) a narrow tubular zone 13, which creates high temperature turbulent mixing of the gases and facilitates completion of the hydrolysis reaction; and
3) a conical diverging, medium temperature, combustion zone 15, wherein the gases are combusted with the combustion air or oxygen.
Combustion air or oxygen 9 is added to the reactor 14, as also shown in
A water quench unit 20 is attached right at the outlet of the combustion zone 15 of the reactor 14, as seen in
A scrubber tank 22 is attached at the bottom of the quench unit 20, as best shown in
A standard flue gas cleaning technology, i.e. either a wet off-gas cleaning technology using an acid gas neutralizing scrubber 24 (as shown in
An induced draft fan 26 draws the off gases through the system S and creates a slightly negative pressure in the system S, as shown in
In operation, the steam plasma torch 4 heats the reactor 14 to the desired operating conditions and the precursor material 1 is injected into the plasma plume. The highly reactive hydrogen and hydroxyl ions present in the steam plasma hydrolyze the precursor material 1 in the high temperature hydrolysis zone 11. Additional steam 7 is added to the hydrolysis zone 11. The reacted stream flows through the narrow tubular zone 13, which provides the necessary turbulence and residence time for reaction to reach the combustion zone 15 of the reactor 14. The combustion air or oxygen 9 is added to the reactor 14 and the off gases exiting the reactor 14 enter the water quench 20 located at the exit of the combustion zone 15. The off gases are rapidly quenched by the fine spray of water 17 created by the spray nozzles 18. The liquid stream settles in the scrubber tank 22, whereas the off gases exit the scrubber tank 22 and pass through a standard off gas cleaning technology. Either wet scrubbing technology or dry scrubbing technology is used to clean the off gases from acid gases such as HF and HCl and to convert them to innocuous salts. The induced draft fan 26 is used to drive the off gases through the system S and create a slightly negative pressure in the system S.
Caustic soda or another alkali from a tank or drum 25 is fed to the scrubber water recirculation line 31 by a dosing pump 30 to continually adjust the pH of the scrubber solution, neutralizing any acid components (HCl, HF) from the off gases. Neutralized water 21 is removed from the scrubber tank by a blow down line 32.
Now turning to
The gases leaving the quench unit 20 are sent to an acid recovery tank 22b, wherein diluted acid is used to scrub the acid gases leaving the quench unit 20. The acid recovery tank 22b is attached directly at the bottom of the quench unit 20, as best shown in
The gases travel counter current to the flow of scrubbing liquid in a packed acid scrubber unit 43. The acid gases get scrubbed as they travel through the acid scrubbing unit 43. Weak acid mixture, stream 44, which gets collected at the bottom of the acid recovery tank 22b is removed periodically from the acid scrubbing tank unit 22.
The scrubbed gas stream, stream 45, leaving the acid scrubbing unit 43 enters a gas cleaning scrubber unit 46. A scrubber tank unit 47 is attached at the bottom of the gas cleaning scrubber unit 46. The scrubber tank unit 47 uses acid resistant plastic sealing material on all sealing surfaces. The scrubber tank unit 47 acts as a reservoir for collecting the scrubbing water and provides the necessary water head for a scrubber water recirculation pump 48.
Caustic soda or another alkali from a tank or drum 52 is fed to a scrubber water recirculation line 54 by a dosing pump 51 to continually adjust the pH of the scrubber solution, neutralizing any acid components (HCl, HF) from the off gases. Neutralized water 49 is removed from the gas cleaning scrubber tank by a blow down line 53.
A standard flue gas cleaning technology, i.e. either a wet off-gas cleaning technology using the neutralizing scrubber 46 (as shown in
Although the present invention has been described hereinabove by way of embodiments thereof, it may be modified, without departing from the nature and teachings of the subject invention as described herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2753043 | Sep 2011 | CA | national |
This Application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/629,256, filed Feb. 23, 2015, and which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,562,684 on Feb. 7, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/269,831, filed May 5, 2014, and which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,961,887 on Feb. 24, 2015, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/424,178, filed on Mar. 19, 2012, and which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,716,546 on May 6, 2014, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/424,178 claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/454,368, filed on Mar. 18, 2011, and to Canadian Application No. 2,753,043, filed on Sep. 23, 2011. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/629,256, U.S. Pat. No. 9,562,684, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/269,831, U.S. Pat. No. 8,961,887, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/424,178, U.S. Pat. No. 8,716,546, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/454,368, and Canadian Application No. 2,753,043 are each incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4509434 | Boday et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4751056 | Hug et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
5026464 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5227603 | Doolette et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5296672 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5618985 | Kulmala et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5866753 | Deam et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6372156 | Kong et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6810821 | Chan | Nov 2004 | B2 |
8231851 | Irie et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8716546 | Carabin et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8961887 | Carabin | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9562684 | Carabin | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20030024806 | Foret | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030049190 | Irie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030171635 | Bereczky et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20130012605 | Zhou | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2484472 | Nov 2003 | CA |
1081923 | Feb 1994 | CN |
1182456 | May 1998 | CN |
1652862 | Aug 2005 | CN |
101823073 | Sep 2010 | CN |
2222600 | Mar 1990 | GB |
02-107387 | Apr 1990 | JP |
H03-090172 | Apr 1991 | JP |
02107387 | Apr 1994 | JP |
07080286 | Mar 1995 | JP |
08500615 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H09-276691 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10249161 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000334294 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2004-530462 | Oct 2004 | JP |
A2007-524800 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2007-326089 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2014-511756 | May 2014 | JP |
2003-0067241 | Aug 2003 | KR |
9500464 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 03066197 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03095072 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Thermal hydrolysis improves sludge digestion,” The Engineer Source (Mar. 2, 2010). http:...source.theengineer.co.uk/plant-equipmwnt/energy/waste/emissions-management/slu.... |
International Search Report dated Jun. 21, 2012 in International Application No. PCT/CA2012/000305 (3 pages). |
UNEP, “Report of the technology and economic assessment panel,” vol. 3B: (Apr. 2002). (150 pages). |
Yu, et al., “A review of CFC and halon treatment technologies—The nature and role of catalysts,” Catalysis Surveys from Asia (Mar. 2006) 10(1): 40-54. |
“International workshop on the disposal of ozone-depleting substances,” Geneva International Conference Center (Jul. 10, 2000). (73 pages). |
Hassel, “Experiment investigation of PIC formation in CFC incineration,” (Dec. 1, 1991). (abstract). |
Search Report from the Patent Office of the People's Republic of China, dated Sep. 10, 2014. (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170307214 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61454368 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13424178 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14269831 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14629256 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 15426735 | US | |
Parent | 14269831 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 14629256 | US |