The present invention relates to the manufacture of frozen confections. In particular, it relates to the manufacture of these frozen confections using apparatus with forming elements and moulds.
Manufacturing chocolate balls has been known for decades and various technologies based on cylindrical rollers have been proposed such as the one described in EP923875 which describes a pair of parallel rollers having cavities defined on the outer cylindrical surfaces, a depositing device depositing a solidifiable liquid such as chocolate onto said cylindrical surfaces, thus providing two separate parts of food articles. By counter rotating the rollers, the two surfaces move towards one another and join the two separate parts into one food product. The whole process is based on the fact each individual food article is linked to the others by a film, or a web, made out of the same food material. It is also relying on the fact that, on cooling, chocolate contracts and readily de-moulds from the cavities.
Whereas this process is adequate for manufacturing chocolate balls from a liquid base, it is totally inappropriate for the manufacturing of ice cream products wherein the cavities would be filled by a frozen aerated product. The main obstacles against transferring this technology to ice cream products are that the cavities must be at a low enough temperature, otherwise the ice cream fed into these cavities will melt (at least at the surface), but if the cavities are below 0° C., at a temperature where ice starts to form, then the ice cream will stick to the surface and will not be easily ‘de-mouldable’.
Such problems are for example illustrated in JP62-91148 which attempts to propose a process for the manufacturing of ice balls while addressing the problem of ice sticking to the walls of the cavities and which can be described as follows.
When the corresponding cavities of the pair of rollers pass the point where they are the closest to one another, the frozen product in each cavity is not pressed hard enough against the contiguous product situated into the corresponding cavity on the other roller, when the cavities move again away from each other through the rotation of the rollers, the force linking the two half products is too weak in comparison with the adhesion between each half product and the cavity in which it is and thus it stays in the cavity and does not ‘de-mould’. JP62-91148 addresses this problem by i) heating one of the roller with an internal circulation of hot liquid, ii) by providing ejection mechanisms in each cavity of the other roller, and iii) providing excess material proud of the roller surface. These ejection mechanisms allow for the two half products to be pressed together while heating one roller allows for demoulding the product.
This technology does not constitute a practical solution for the problem raised by attempting to produce frozen aerated products using a pair rollers since the need to effectively melt the surface of each product to allow for its de-moulding raises unacceptable hygiene issues. In other respect, the ejection mechanisms situated in each and every cavity of a roller are extremely complex, difficult to maintain, and again constitute a hygiene hazard.
More recently it has been proposed process for the manufacturing of frozen aerated products comprising;
Preferably, the two separate forming elements are a pair of parallel rollers wherein each roller has a multiplicity of open cavities on its surface, the rollers counter-rotating so that respective cavities in the two forming elements lie opposite one another and the frozen aerated product in a cavity of a first roller is pressed against the frozen aerated product in an opposite cavity of a second roller.
Each roller is hollow with its cavity being partially filled with liquid nitrogen so as to ensure cooling of the rollers.
Whereas such an apparatus is perfectly satisfactory with regards to the quality of the moulding process, it consumes, though sheer evaporation of the liquid nitrogen, a huge amount of liquid nitrogen which is in fact not used in the cooling process. Typically, in operation, less than 5% of the liquid nitrogen is effectively used to cool the moulds
There is therefore a need for an apparatus which dramatically decreases the liquid nitrogen consumption and whereas thermal insulation could be seen as an obvious solution, the study leading to the present invention has shown that such a potential solution was full of problems due to the stress created by thermal deformation. In that respect, Von Mises stress are preferably be below 200 MPa (for a safety factor 2), more preferably below 100 MPa (for a safety factor 3) in all points of the roller.
Frozen aerated product shall mean a frozen confection as described in ICE CREAM—Fourth Edition—W S Arbuckle—Chapman & Hall—pages 297 to 312.
Temperature of the rollers:
Von Misses stress
It is the object of the present invention to provide a roller having a multiplicity of open moulding cavities on its surface, the roller being hollow with an internal cavity, said cavity being partially filled with liquid nitrogen, characterised in that
a vacuum insulation compartment is located on each side of the roller,
the vacuum insulation compartment, in radial cross section, presenting an outside generally plane and circular wall in the form of an annular disc, joint to a roller side wall by two portions having:
Preferably each sigmoid cross section is characterised by:
Preferably, the first curvature is linked to the roller side by an opposite curvature having a radius R4.
The present invention will be further described with reference to the sole accompanying drawings wherein
As disclosed in the accompanying drawing, the apparatus comprises a pair of parallel rollers 1 and 2 having mould cavities 3 defined on their outer cylindrical surfaces. A first filling device 4 is provided for supplying frozen aerated product into the mould cavities 3 of the first roller 1. A second filling device 5 is provided for supplying frozen aerated product into the mould cavities 3 of the second roller 2. As disclosed in
The two rollers which are adapted to counter-rotate, are positioned to touch each other. By ‘touching each other’, it is meant a clearance of less than 0.1 mm. The rollers must be refrigerated by circulating an appropriate refrigerating fluid, such as liquid nitrogen, in order to have, in operation, a temperature of below −100° C., as measured by an internal probe 14 mm beneath the surface.
As shown in
During operation a refrigerating medium, preferably liquid nitrogen, is supplied through the pipe 17 and sprayed through nozzle 18 in cavity 10 where it will thus cool the outer wall of the cavity and thence cool the mould cavities 3. The refrigerating medium is then gasified and led through pipe 14 out through pipe 16.
Initially both rollers run independently to reach a temperature of around −160 C. Once this temperature is reached, the two rollers are brought close to each other. Because of the shrinkage caused by the very low temperature the respective positions of the two rollers has to be checked at all time.
Ice cream is doused onto the mould cavities of the cold rollers. The two half moulds filled with ice cream come into contact, at this point a stick (not represented) is inserted and the fully formed ice cream is ejected.
Each of the two filling devices advantageously comprises a manifold mounted in the close proximity to the roller cylindrical surface, with a clearance, in operation of below 1 mm.
The two rollers can be made for example of aluminium or steel and the surface can be treated with a coating to improve hardness (e.g. chromium coating) or to improve mould release (e.g. PTFE). The mould cavities shapes follow the normal rules for demouldability. Preferably, at the level of mould cavity opening, the mould cavity wall is not substantially vertical. It thus allows a better expansion of the frozen aerated product and a better demouldability.
Various vacuum panels in square joints to the roller sides, as described in
The Von Mises Stress at the rim of the roller was between 1000 and 3000 the displacement being over 10 mm.
This was clearly not acceptable
A vacuum panel with angle joints to the roller sides, as described in
The Von Mises Stress was 2,500 and the displacement was 2.6 mm.
This was clearly not acceptable.
A vacuum panel with corrugated joints to the roller sides, as described in
The Von Mises Stress was reduced to 700. This was still not acceptable.
A vacuum panel with angle corrugated joints to the roller sides, as described in
The Von Mises Stress was reduced to 388. This was still not acceptable.
Vacuum panels as described in
Each sigmoid cross section is characterised by:
Preferably, the first curvature is linked to the roller side by an opposite curvature having a radius R4.
Preferably also the straight portion is substantially at a right angle with the outside circular wall.
The space between the roller side and the vacuum panel was at a vacuum pressure of less than 0.1 mbar.
Various geometries were tested which are summarised in the following table
The following variations for this design were tested in order to obtain the optimised solution:
The rollers and the vacuum panels were made of food grade stainless steel. With such a geometry the liquid nitrogen consumption can be reduced by 50% to 60%.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12186509 | Sep 2012 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/067764 | 8/28/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/048658 | 4/3/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6129940 | Leadbeater | Oct 2000 | A |
20040071834 | Dyks | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0923875 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1886580 | Feb 2008 | EP |
62-091148 | Apr 1987 | JP |
62091148 | Apr 1987 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Arbuckle, Frozen Confections, Novelties, Fancy Molded Ice Creams, Ice Cream, Jan. 1, 1986, 297-312, ., Van Nostrand Reinhold, US. |
Search Report in EP12186509, Mar. 13, 2013. |
Search Report in PCTEP2013067764, Oct. 25, 2013. |
Written Opinion in EP12186509, Mar. 13, 2013. |
Written Opinion in PCTEP2013067764, Oct. 25, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150245630 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |