The present invention relates to apparatus for the storage of hazardous material, such as radioactive waste, the material being stored in containers arranged in a stack formation. More particularly, the invention relates to a stabilizing device for incorporation in a stack of containers so as to aid stability of the stack when subjected to external forces, such as those resulting from a seismic event.
In one known method for the disposal of radioactive waste, the waste is placed in boxes and then covered with a cementitious grout which is injected into the box. After a curing period, a capping grout is introduced into the box in order to seal the waste and to remove any ullage space where gases can accumulate. After a further curing period, a lid is fixed to the box, which is then subjected to a decontamination process. The boxes are transferred to a heavily-shielded storage building where they are deposited in rows of vertical stacks by a remotely-operated crane.
In an alternative storage system, the waste is encapsulated in a cementitious matrix inside a stainless steel drum. Several drums are placed in a stillage and the stillages are formed into a vertical stack using a remotely-operated crane.
The boxes or stillages may have to be stored for a very long period of time of, say, 100 years. During that period, it is desirable that the storage building and stacks of boxes or stillage are able to withstand not only operational loads, but also seismic and other extreme environmental conditions.
It is an object of this invention to provide apparatus for storing hazardous material in which a stack of containers holding the material remains stable when subjected to external forces, such as those generated during a seismic event.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a stabilizing device for inclusion in a stack of containers in which holding hazardous waste is held, wherein the stabilizing device comprises a table for supporting a container in the stack, and a base, the table being movable relative to the base so as to aid stability of the stack when the stack is subjected to external forces.
Preferably, the table is mounted on the base.
In a preferred embodiment, the table has a lower surface resting on an upper surface of the base, the lower surface being adapted for sliding movement on the upper surface.
The table may be generally rectangular in shape with a foot member depending from each corner thereof, each foot having a surface defining the lower surface of the table.
A lubricant may be applied to at least one of the said upper and lower surfaces.
Preferably, the lubricant is applied to each of the upper and lower surfaces.
A preferred lubricant is molybdenum disulphide.
The coefficient of friction between the upper and lower surfaces preferably lies in the range of 0.05 to 0.1.
Preferably, the base is provided with locating means for engagement with a container arranged below the stabilizing device.
The locating means may comprise a plurality of projections extending from a lower surface of the base, the projections being adapted to locate in apertures provided in a container arranged below the stabilizing device.
The relative movement of the table with respect to the base is preferably restricted by a resilient buffer means, the buffer means being located so as to be contacted by the table upon movement of the table relative to the base.
Preferably, the resilient buffer means are mounted on the base and wherein a bumper member depends from the table, the bumper member being adapted to be contacted by the buffer means upon movement of the table relative to the base.
Suitably, there are four resilient buffer means, the buffer means being located so that they are disposed at equi-angular positions around the bumper.
The resilient buffer means preferably comprises a movable plunger which is depressed by the bumper member upon movement of the table relative to the base, the depression of the plunger being opposed by the force exerted by a spring.
Desirably, the force exerted the spring is sufficient to overcome the force exerted by the movement of the table relative to the base.
Advantageously, each of the buffer means is spaced from the bumper member.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a storage system comprising a stack of containers in which hazardous waste is held, wherein a container in the stack is supported by a stabilizing device, the device comprising a base, and a table for supporting a container in the stack, the table being movable relative to the base so as to aid stability of the stack when the stack is subjected to external forces.
Preferably, the stabilizing device is interposed between a container and a next lower container.
The stabilizing device may be interposed beneath a container in the topmost position in the stack and supported by the next lower container.
The stack of containers may comprise at least nine containers.
The invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
The stabilizing device 1 comprises a table 2 and a base 3, both of which are of rectangular shape, as seen in the plan view of
In an alternative embodiment, the surface plates 5 may incorporate, or be replaced by, rolling elements, such as roller bearings.
The table 2 is pressed from stainless steel plate so as to form a raised rim 6 and a relieved central region 7. As best seen in
At each corner of the table 2 is a rectangular hole 12 which enable the device 1 to be handled by lifting equipment.
To ensure that the base 3 has the required stiffness, channel sections 13 are welded diagonally to the underside of the base. At each corner of the base 3, a locating projection 14 extends from the underside of the channel section 13. When the device 1 is incorporated in a stack of containers 151, 152, as seen in
As best seen in
The four buffers 17 serve a dual purpose; firstly, they ensure that the table 2 is centralized and, secondly, during a seismic event, they exert a force that is sufficient to overcome the limiting friction between the table and the base, thereby moving the table back to its central position.
In use, the stabilizing device 1 is incorporated in a storage system comprising a stack of containers, two of which 151, 152 are indicated in
Advantageously, the stabilizing device 1 may be positioned between the topmost container 151 and the next lower container 152.
A remotely-operated crane, utilizing the holes 12 in the table 2, deposits the stabilizing device 1 on top of the container 152 so that the projections 14 are located and locked in the holes provided at the top of the container 152. The crane then places a further container 151 on the table 2.
The weight of the container 151 is borne by the four feet 4 which rest on the four surfaces plates 5.
If the stack is subjected to external forces resulting from an earthquake, the table 2 and the container 151 supported thereby, will slide on the base 3. As a result of this movement, the bumper 16 will come into contact with a head 20 of at least one of the buffers 17. The opposing force exerted by the spring 21 of the contacted buffer is sufficient to overcome the limiting friction force between the lubricated contacting surfaces of the feet 4 and the surface plates 5. Thus, the table 2 is moved back to its central position. For effective functioning of the stabilizing device 1 it is desirable that the natural frequency of the spring 21 is different from the natural frequency of the stack.
The clearance between the buffers 17 and the bumper 16 induces a time lag in the mechanism, thereby ensuring that the forces are out of phase with those created by the earthquake. In use, therefore, the stabilizing device 1 has the effect of transferring the forces resulting from the earthquake back to the lower containers of the stack. Under earthquake conditions, therefore, the stack will remain stable and resist the tendency to topple over.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0012321.6 | May 2000 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB01/02062 | 5/10/2001 | WO | 00 | 7/21/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/91133 | 11/29/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4565039 | Oguro et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4593526 | Pankowiecki | Jun 1986 | A |
4599834 | Fujimoto et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4793105 | Caspe | Dec 1988 | A |
5191356 | Shibamiya | Mar 1993 | A |
5636753 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5816559 | Fujimoto | Oct 1998 | A |
5829362 | Evans et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5970666 | Kurabayashi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6085472 | Malhotra | Jul 2000 | A |
6216991 | Okamoto | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6467961 | Nakamaru et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6648295 | Herren et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1005049 | Nov 1999 | EP |
8194092 | Jul 1996 | JP |
09210121 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10177094 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11000269 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11153187 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11208819 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11294752 | Oct 1999 | JP |
WO 9533268 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9533269 | Dec 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040041071 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |