Apparatus for treating particulate material

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7802376
  • Patent Number
    7,802,376
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 4, 2005
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 28, 2010
    13 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Gravini; Stephen Michael
    Agents
    • St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens LLC
Abstract
An apparatus for treating particulate material has a process chamber for receiving and treating the material. A bottom is composed of a plurality of overlapping guide plates which are placed one above the other and between which annular slots for process air to pass through are formed. An annular-gap nozzle is arranged centrally in the bottom, the orifice of this annular-gap nozzle being designed in such a way that a planar spray pancake which runs approximately parallel to the bottom plane can be sprayed.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to an apparatus for treating particulate material, having a process chamber which is intended for receiving and treating the material and has a bottom which is composed of a plurality of overlapping guide plates which are placed one above the other and between which annular slots are formed, via which process air having an essentially horizontal component motion directed radially outward can be introduced.


Such an apparatus has been disclosed, for example, by DE 102 48 116 B3.


Such known apparatuses serve to dry, granulate or coat particulate material. A gaseous medium, “process air”, is introduced into the process chamber via the bottom and enters the process chamber in an approximately horizontally oriented manner through the numerous slots between the overlapping guide plates. Due to overlapping, annular guide plates, between which numerous slots are formed, a flow of process air directed radially from inside to outside forms in the process chamber and is deflected upward by the wall of the process chamber. The material to be treated is entrained in the process, but falls centrally downward on account of the gravitational force and again strikes the air cushion of the process air. If a certain extensive component is imposed on the process air, a toroidally revolving swirl flow ring gradually forms.


If larger agglomerates are to be formed from powders as fine as dust, that is to say if the material is to be granulated, a sticky medium is sprayed toward the toroidal ring via nozzles. In DE 102 48 116 B3 mentioned at the beginning, for example, spray nozzles directed obliquely upward are inserted into the wall of the container which encloses the process chamber.


During coating, a coating layer is to be applied as uniformly as possible to a larger body already present, that is to say said coating layer is to be sprayed on.


Various configurations of nozzles are known, the common feature of which is that a usually liquid or also particulate treatment substance is sprayed by means of spray air to form a fine mist. To this end, it has become known, for example, to expel the liquid under high pressure from a slot-shaped nozzle orifice and to spray it through spray-air orifices, whether on one side or on both sides of the liquid gap.


DE 102 32 863 A1 has disclosed an atomizing nozzle which has flow passages which are annular in cross section. Depending on the spray angle and looping angle, radiate, conical or more or less planar spray pancakes are produced. At a spray angle of 180° and a looping angle of 360° a virtually planar spray pancake is produced.


In this technology, which is widely used in the pharmaceutical field of application, it is attempted to achieve a result which is as uniform as possible, i.e. to achieve granulates with a very narrow grain size distribution, and to achieve during the coating a coating layer which is as uniform as possible, i.e. in particular a coating layer of identical thickness, at all particles of the charge which are contained in the apparatus. A considerable problem consists in the fact that material particles which wander around in an uncontrolled manner and are wetted with the moist and usually sticky spray liquid adhere to one another to form unwanted agglomerates.


Therefore precisely defined flow conditions which permit an optimum treatment result are desired in the toroidally rotating material band. In particular, it is desired that, after the spraying, the particles assume a flight path in which they move away from one another where possible and not toward one another in order to prevent undesirable agglomerates.


It is therefore the object of the present invention to provide for an improvement in such apparatuses for the treatment of particulate material to the effect that a harmonious sequence of movement with an optimum treatment result can be achieved.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the invention, the object is achieved in that, in an apparatus of the type mentioned at the beginning, an annular-gap nozzle is arranged centrally in the bottom, the orifice of this annular-gap nozzle being designed in such a way that a planar spray pancake which runs approximately parallel to the bottom plane can be sprayed.


The combination of such an annular-gap nozzle with a bottom of annular guide plates having a flow of process air directed from inside to outside now leads surprisingly to an especially harmonious guidance of air and material. The process air discharging through the annular slots forms an air cushion which glides radially from inside to outside over the bottom and leads the material to be treated radially outward into an increasingly larger available space; the particles thus first of all move away from one another.


The process air directed upward on the wall carries the material particles along with it vertically upward. These material particles separate from the process air flowing off, are moved in a radially inwardly directed manner toward the center and, on account of the gravitational force, fall downward approximately centrally in the center onto the cushion of process air passing through the bottom. Due to the central provision of the annular-gap nozzle with the planar spray pancake sprayed from said annular-gap nozzle, the material falling down can be sprayed uniformly and can then immediately be moved radially outward in a radiated manner, that is to say the material particles can be moved away from one another. The material particles are therefore sprayed in a very specific manner by the spray pancake when falling down, are cushioned by the process air cushion and are moved radially outward. After leaving the spray pancake, the further path directed horizontally radially outward, with the subsequent movement rising vertically upward and the movement returning again to the center, is available in order to dry and accordingly solidify the sprayed particles by means of the process air before they strike the spray pancake again. Due to the 360° looping of the spray pancake, all the material falling down centrally can be sprayed uniformly by the spray liquid.


It has now been surprisingly found that a harmonious uniform optimum treatment of the material can be achieved by this combination. The annular-gap nozzle works “amidships” and “underbed”. The material falling onto the spray pancake is received by the process air cushion and is treated in an especially harmonious and uniform manner.


Even in the case of very large test batches up to 650 kg, a perfect granulating, coating and drying process is achieved. The air cushion on the bottom side keeps the bottom surface completely free of sprayed substance, i.e. all the sprayed substance is fed into the material, so that no spray losses occur, which is extremely important in particular in the pharmaceutical field.


In a further embodiment of the invention, discharge openings for support air are provided between the orifice of the annular-gap nozzle and the bottom lying underneath in order to effect a support cushion on the underside of the spray pancake.


It is generally known that a certain vacuum is produced in the immediate region of a nozzle orifice, and this vacuum results in accumulations of material next to the spray orifice. In the case of the spray pancake mentioned at the beginning, no problem is to be seen on its top side in this respect, since of course the material particles fall down centrally and are directed away horizontally. On the underside of the spray pancake, however, such vacuum zones could gradually cause particle accumulations. Support air is provided by the provision of the additional discharge openings, this region on the underside in the region of the orifice of the annular-gap nozzle being “blown free” by said support air. A further additional effect is that the support air can actually support the sprayed planar spray pancake on its underside, that is to say said support air prevents the spray pancake from undesirably moving downward on account of the gravitational force or on account of the spray cone forming in cross section. This rules out the possibility of spray losses or of the sticky materials being deposited on the top side of the bottom.


In a further embodiment of the invention, the support air is provided from the annular-gap nozzle itself and/or by process air.


These measures enable the support air to be brought about in many different ways. Discharge openings may be provided on the annular-gap nozzle itself, via which discharge openings some of the spray air discharges in order to help to form the support air. In addition or alternatively, some of the process air which flows through the bottom can be directed in the direction of the underside of the spray pancake and can thus help to form the support air.


In a further embodiment of the invention, the annular-gap nozzle has an approximately conical head, and the orifice runs along a circular area of a conic section.


This measure has the advantage that, by means of the cone, the material particles moving vertically from top to bottom are fed uniformly, smoothly and specifically onto the spray pancake which is sprayed from the circular spray gap in the bottom end of the cone.


In a further embodiment of the invention, a frustoconical wall is provided in the region between the orifice and the bottom lying underneath, this frustoconical wall having through-openings for support air.


This measure has the advantage that the abovementioned harmonious deflecting movement is maintained by the continuation via the frustum, and support air can discharge through the through-openings in this region and provides for the corresponding support on the underside of the spray pancake.


In a further embodiment of the invention, an annular slot for process air to pass through is formed between the underside of the frustoconical wall.


This measure has the advantage that the transfer of the material particles to the air cushion of the bottom can be controlled especially effectively and, starting in a specific manner, can be carried out directly in the region below the nozzle.


In a further embodiment of the invention, an orifice of a feed for a substance is arranged above the annular-gap nozzle.


It has been found that an additional substance can be fed very effectively on account of the harmonious flow of the selected combination of annular gaps and annular-gap nozzle. It is therefore possible, for example, to directly feed a powder centrally onto the spray pancake when the latter is being formed, so that a powder can be put in a firmly adhering manner onto the surface, made sticky by the nozzle, of the material to be treated. As a result, a rapid increase in the layer thickness during the coating can be achieved. This is not the only advantage. A further considerable advantage consists in the fact that, for example, it is possible to feed an active substance which is sensitive to moisture and therefore cannot be processed in a suspension or in a solution and sprayed through the annular-gap nozzle. In this case, the annular-gap nozzle sprays only the sticky medium; the actual active substance is fed centrally as powder. This further feeding, which of course from the fluidic point of view is an additional parameter to be taken into account, can therefore be carried out, since a highly defined and harmonious flow can be achieved by the abovementioned combination.


In a further embodiment of the invention, guide elements are arranged between the annular guide plates, these guide elements additionally imposing an extensive flow component on the process air passing through.


This measure known per se has the advantage that the corresponding extensive component motion can be imposed by these guide elements in order to form the toroidally rotating band of uniformly swirled material particles, which as a result can uniformly strike the planar spray pancake.


It goes without saying that the abovementioned features and the features still to be explained below can be used not only in the specified combination but also in other combinations or on their own without departing from the scope of the present invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is described in more detail below with reference to a few selected exemplary embodiments in connection with the attached drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 shows a highly schematic diametral cross section through an apparatus for treating particulate material, and



FIG. 2 shows a corresponding section with an additional feed for a further substance.





DETAIL DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

An apparatus shown in FIG. 1 for treating particulate material is provided overall with the reference numeral 10.


The apparatus 10 has a container 12 with an upright cylindrical wall 14. This wall 14 encloses a corresponding process chamber 16.


The process chamber 16 has a bottom 18, below which an inflow chamber 20 is located.


As disclosed, for example by DE 192 48 116 B3 mentioned at the beginning, the bottom 18 is composed of a total of ten annular guide plates situated one above the other. The ten guide plates are set one above the other in such a way that an outermost annular plate connected to the wall 14 forms a lowermost annular plate, on which the further nine inner annular plates are then placed, these nine inner annular plates partly overlapping the respective annular plate underneath.


For the sake of clarity, only some of the guide plates are provided with reference numerals, for example the two guide plates 22 and 23 lying one above the other. By this placing one above the other and by the spacing, an annular slot 25 is formed in each case between two guide plates, through which slot 25 process air 28 having an essentially horizontally directed component motion can pass through the bottom 18, as is of course known per se. Inserted from below in the central uppermost inner guide plate 24 in its central opening is an annular-gap nozzle 30. The annular-gap nozzle 30 has an orifice 32, which has a total of three orifice gaps 33, 34 and 35. All three orifice gaps 33, 34 and 35 are oriented in such a way that they spray approximately parallel to the bottom 18, that is to say approximately horizontally with a looping angle of 360°. Spray air is forced out via the top gap 33 and the lowest gap 35, and the liquid to be sprayed is forced out through the middle gap 34.


The annular-gap nozzle 30 has a rod-shaped body 36 which extends downward and contains the corresponding passages and feed lines, as is known per se. The annular-gap nozzle may be designed, for example, like the atomizing nozzle from DE 102 32 863 A1.


This annular-gap nozzle may be formed, for example, with a “rotary annular gap”, in which the walls of the passage through which the liquid is sprayed rotate relative to one another in order to rule out clogging or lumping, so that spraying from the gap 34 can be effected uniformly over the entire looping angle of 360°. With respect to the longitudinal axis of the body 36 of the annular-gap nozzle 30, there is therefore a spray angle of 180°.


The annular-gap nozzle 30 has a conical head 38 above the orifice 32.


In the region below the orifice 32, there is a frustoconical wall 40 which has numerous openings 42. As can be seen from FIG. 1, the underside of the frustoconical wall 40 rests on the innermost guide plate 24, to be precise in such a way that a slot 26 through which process air can pass is formed between the underside of the frustoconical wall 40 and the guide plate 24 lying underneath and partly overlapping with said wall 40.


The flow conditions which form in the run-in state are shown in the right-hand half of FIG. 1.


A planar spray pancake 44 discharges from the orifice 32. Due to the air which passes through the openings 42 in the frustoconical wall 40 and which may be, for example, process air, a support air flow 46 forms on the underside of the spray pancake 44. Due to the process air 28 which passes through the numerous slots 25, 26, a radial flow forms in the direction of the wall 14 and is deflected upward by the latter, as shown by an arrow 48. The process air and the material to be treated now separate from one another, the process air is drawn off through outlets, the swirled material is moved radially inward and falls vertically downward in the direction of the conical head 38 of the annular-gap nozzle 30 on account of the gravitational force. The material falling down is smoothly diverted there and is directed onto the top side of the spray pancake 44 and is treated there with the sprayed medium. The sprayed particles in the spray pancake move away from one another, since of course a considerably larger space is available to the particles after leaving the annular orifice 32. In the region of the spray pancake, the material particles to be treated collide with liquid particles and, remaining in this direction of movement, are moved away from one another and in the process are treated very uniformly and harmoniously with process air, that is to say they are dried.


A section comparable with the section in FIG. 1 is shown in perspective in FIG. 2, the apparatus shown there being provided overall with the reference numeral 50. Here, too, there is a container 52 which has a cylindrical upright wall 54 in which a process chamber 56 is defined. As described above in connection with FIG. 1, the bottom 58 is composed of ten guide plates correspondingly placed one above the other, only the two guide plates 62 and 63, for example, being designated here. The inflow chamber 60 is then again located below the bottom 58.


It is shown here that guide elements 64 and 65 are arranged between the guide plates, these guide elements 64 and 65 leading to a situation in which not only does the process air passing though between the guide plates 62 and 63 flow exactly radially outward, but a certain extensive component motion is imposed on said process air, as shown by the arrow 68.


Here, too, a corresponding annular-gap nozzle 70 as described above is again arranged centrally. A feed 72, for example a laterally fed pipe, is arranged centrally above the annular-gap nozzle, the orifice 74 of the feed 72 lying exactly coaxially centrally above the annular-gap nozzle 70. The position of the orifice can be adjusted vertically.


This makes it possible, for example, to bring a solid in the form of a powder 78 onto the top side of the planar spray pancake sprayed from the annular-gap nozzle 70.


In both configurations mentioned, the annular-gap nozzle 30 or 70, respectively, is designed in such a way that it can be removed from the bottom from below even during operation, for example in order to check for a malfunction or the like. Before removal, the feed of the spray liquid is of course stopped; however, it is still possible to circulate the material in the apparatus 10 or 50, since a process-air column rising upward forms in the central hole, so that it is impossible for material particles to fall through this opening. This is again a consequence of the highly defined harmonious swirling movement within the limits of the toroidally rotating band.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for treating particulate material, comprising: a process chamber which is intended for receiving and treating a material,said process chamber having a horizontal bottom which is composed of a plurality of overlapping annular guide plates, which are placed one above the other and between which overlapping annular guide plates annular slots are formed, via which annular slots a process air having an essentially horizontal component motion directed radially outward can be introduced into said process chamber, andan annular-gap nozzle being arranged centrally in said bottom, an orifice of said annular-gap nozzle having orifice gaps oriented in such a way that they spray approximately horizontally with a looping angle of 360° such that a planar spray pancake which runs approximately parallel to a bottom plane can be sprayed,a central feed for a substance arranged above said annular-gap nozzle, said feed having a discharge orifice arranged above said annular-gap nozzle, wherein said feed and said discharge orifice can be adjusted vertically.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein discharge openings are provided between said orifice of said annular-gap nozzle and said bottom disposed underneath of said orifice, said discharge openings serving for discharging a support air in order to effect a support cushion on an underside of said spray pancake.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said support air discharged from said discharge openings is provided from said annular-gap nozzle.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said support air discharged by said discharge openings is provided by said process air.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said support air discharged from said discharge openings is provided from said annular-gap nozzle and by said process air.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said annular-gap nozzle has an approximately conical head, and wherein said orifice of said annular-gap nozzle runs along a circular circumferential line of said conical head.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein a frustoconical wall is disposed between said orifice of said annular-gap nozzle and said bottom lying underneath, said frustoconical wall having openings for discharging a support air for supporting said planar spray pancake.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein an annular slot for passing process air is formed at an underside of said frustoconical wall.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein guide elements are arranged between said annular guide plates, said guide elements additionally imposing a flow component on said process air passing through said guide plates.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said orifice of said feed lies exactly coaxially above the annular-gap nozzle.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a solid is introduced through said feed.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said solid can be a powder.
FIELD OF INVENTION

This application is a continuation of pending International Patent Application PCT/EP2004/010096 filed on Sep. 10, 2004 which designates the United States.

US Referenced Citations (216)
Number Name Date Kind
1547171 Huttlin Jul 1925 A
2046525 Miller Jul 1936 A
2264523 Gustafsson et al. Dec 1941 A
2303280 Jenkins Nov 1942 A
2304857 Stahl Dec 1942 A
2366926 Melton Jan 1945 A
2416923 Jenkins Mar 1947 A
2452858 Miller Nov 1948 A
2607193 Berggren et al. Aug 1952 A
2610092 Thompson Sep 1952 A
2613112 Fletcher Oct 1952 A
2624624 Kirschbaum Jan 1953 A
2680652 Kooistra Jun 1954 A
2770583 Haddad Nov 1956 A
2792259 Shallenberg May 1957 A
2893871 Griffin Jul 1959 A
2953457 Sanna Sep 1960 A
2971250 Wahlin Feb 1961 A
3174283 Crocco et al. Mar 1965 A
3187944 Stock Jun 1965 A
3237870 McCartney et al. Mar 1966 A
3276844 Davison et al. Oct 1966 A
3278125 Lorzing, Jr. et al. Oct 1966 A
3292868 McCartney et al. Dec 1966 A
3309027 Chadwick et al. Mar 1967 A
3328894 Smith, Jr. Jul 1967 A
3343814 Mund Sep 1967 A
3382129 Hampshire May 1968 A
3401888 Sutter Sep 1968 A
3425634 Mutchler Feb 1969 A
3493462 Bunting, Jr. et al. Feb 1970 A
3504893 Hoshi et al. Apr 1970 A
3508308 Bunting, Jr. et al. Apr 1970 A
3540653 Fabre Nov 1970 A
3672188 Geschka et al. Jun 1972 A
3696780 Fritzsche Oct 1972 A
3732086 Heyne May 1973 A
3799716 Salts Mar 1974 A
3856036 Drews et al. Dec 1974 A
3866567 Fritzschz Feb 1975 A
3874092 Huttlin Apr 1975 A
3908933 Goss et al. Sep 1975 A
3923253 Stewart Dec 1975 A
3936577 Christini et al. Feb 1976 A
3939238 Salts Feb 1976 A
3998714 Armstrong Dec 1976 A
4015366 Hall, III Apr 1977 A
RE29285 Christini et al. Jun 1977 E
4035296 Armstrong Jul 1977 A
4035301 Armstrong Jul 1977 A
4045347 Armstrong Aug 1977 A
4159131 Huttlin Jun 1979 A
4184220 Coyle Jan 1980 A
4204955 Armstrong May 1980 A
4313569 Burke Feb 1982 A
4320089 Huttlin Mar 1982 A
4320584 Huttlin Mar 1982 A
RE31023 Hall, III Sep 1982 E
4358057 Burke Nov 1982 A
4392777 Huttlin Jul 1983 A
4434049 Dean et al. Feb 1984 A
4444810 Huttlin Apr 1984 A
4456181 Burnham Jun 1984 A
4463703 Huttlin Aug 1984 A
4545792 Huttlin Oct 1985 A
4587744 Huttlin May 1986 A
4645520 Huttlin Feb 1987 A
4657773 Mueller Apr 1987 A
4674198 Huttlin Jun 1987 A
4685809 Huttlin Aug 1987 A
4697356 Huttlin Oct 1987 A
4736895 Huttlin Apr 1988 A
4815660 Boger Mar 1989 A
4838487 Schneider Jun 1989 A
4934595 Reimer Jun 1990 A
4934651 Nowicki Jun 1990 A
4952325 Clifford Aug 1990 A
4953365 Lang et al. Sep 1990 A
4969602 Scholl Nov 1990 A
4970804 Huttlin Nov 1990 A
4989790 Martin et al. Feb 1991 A
5040310 Huttlin Aug 1991 A
RE33767 Christini et al. Dec 1991 E
5085170 Huttlin Feb 1992 A
5087349 Goelzer et al. Feb 1992 A
5145650 Huttlin Sep 1992 A
5158235 Johnson Oct 1992 A
5178652 Huttlin Jan 1993 A
5215253 Saidman et al. Jun 1993 A
5228600 Steijns et al. Jul 1993 A
5282321 Huttlin Feb 1994 A
5282573 Reimer Feb 1994 A
5305716 Huttlin Apr 1994 A
5400966 Weaver et al. Mar 1995 A
5405090 Greene et al. Apr 1995 A
5427317 Huttlin Jun 1995 A
5615696 Lawler Apr 1997 A
5639024 Mueller et al. Jun 1997 A
5688331 Aruga et al. Nov 1997 A
5727739 Hamilton Mar 1998 A
5743969 Lawler Apr 1998 A
5934555 Dobbeling et al. Aug 1999 A
6009847 Huttlin Jan 2000 A
6045061 Huttlin Apr 2000 A
6129290 Nikkanen Oct 2000 A
6161769 Kircher et al. Dec 2000 A
6193172 Soule et al. Feb 2001 B1
6230986 Vacher et al. May 2001 B1
6311473 Benjamin et al. Nov 2001 B1
6358290 Huttlin Mar 2002 B1
6367165 Huttlin Apr 2002 B1
6379614 Sergio et al. Apr 2002 B1
6431139 Huttlin Aug 2002 B1
6521180 Sergio et al. Feb 2003 B2
6533954 Mansour et al. Mar 2003 B2
6550696 Mansour et al. Apr 2003 B2
6649384 Walsh et al. Nov 2003 B2
6718770 Laing et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730167 Shutic et al. May 2004 B2
6740162 Huttlin May 2004 B2
RE38526 Hansinger et al. Jun 2004 E
6746001 Sherikar Jun 2004 B1
6769969 Duescher Aug 2004 B1
6782947 de Rouffignac et al. Aug 2004 B2
6827289 Filicicchia et al. Dec 2004 B2
6877555 Karanikas et al. Apr 2005 B2
6880633 Wellington et al. Apr 2005 B2
6898869 Huttlin May 2005 B2
6898926 Mancini May 2005 B2
6898938 Mancini et al. May 2005 B2
6915850 Vinegar et al. Jul 2005 B2
6918442 Wellington et al. Jul 2005 B2
6918443 Wellington et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923257 Wellington et al. Aug 2005 B2
6929067 Vinegar et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932155 Vinegar et al. Aug 2005 B2
6948562 Wellington et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949141 Huttlin Sep 2005 B2
6951247 de Rouffignac et al. Oct 2005 B2
6964300 Vinegar et al. Nov 2005 B2
6966374 Vinegar et al. Nov 2005 B2
6969123 Vinegar et al. Nov 2005 B2
6981548 Wellington et al. Jan 2006 B2
6991032 Berchenko et al. Jan 2006 B2
6991036 Sumnu-Dindoruk et al. Jan 2006 B2
6991045 Vinegar et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994169 Zhang et al. Feb 2006 B2
6997518 Vinegar et al. Feb 2006 B2
7004247 Cole et al. Feb 2006 B2
7004251 Ward et al. Feb 2006 B2
7011154 Maher et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013972 Vinegar et al. Mar 2006 B2
7014670 Shutic et al. Mar 2006 B2
7021562 Mansour et al. Apr 2006 B2
7028483 Mansour et al. Apr 2006 B2
7032660 Vinegar et al. Apr 2006 B2
7040397 de Rouffignac et al. May 2006 B2
7040398 Wellington et al. May 2006 B2
7040399 Wellington et al. May 2006 B2
7040400 de Rouffignac et al. May 2006 B2
7051807 Vinegar et al. May 2006 B2
7051808 Vinegar et al. May 2006 B1
7051811 de Rouffignac et al. May 2006 B2
7051954 Gerstner May 2006 B2
7055600 Messier et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063145 Veenstra et al. Jun 2006 B2
7066254 Vinegar et al. Jun 2006 B2
7066257 Wellington et al. Jun 2006 B2
7077198 Vinegar et al. Jul 2006 B2
7077199 Vinegar et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083122 Mansour et al. Aug 2006 B2
7086465 Wellington et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090013 Wellington Aug 2006 B2
7096942 de Rouffignac et al. Aug 2006 B1
7100994 Vinegar et al. Sep 2006 B2
7104319 Vinegar et al. Sep 2006 B2
7114566 Vinegar et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128153 Vinegar et al. Oct 2006 B2
7156176 Vinegar et al. Jan 2007 B2
7156260 Hayduk Jan 2007 B2
7165615 Vinegar et al. Jan 2007 B2
7168183 Huttlin Jan 2007 B2
7182221 Hanna et al. Feb 2007 B2
7211169 Noble May 2007 B2
7213383 Walker et al. May 2007 B2
7222753 Hayduk May 2007 B2
7225866 Berchenko et al. Jun 2007 B2
RE39767 Soule et al. Aug 2007 E
7325750 Shutic et al. Feb 2008 B2
7331542 Cocciadiferro et al. Feb 2008 B2
7341632 Noble Mar 2008 B2
7386969 Hayduk Jun 2008 B2
7435064 Huttlin Oct 2008 B2
7461691 Vinegar et al. Dec 2008 B2
7490737 Cocciadiferro et al. Feb 2009 B2
20010048036 Mansour et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010050318 Mansour et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020037236 Sergio et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020044898 Sergio et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020078883 Shutic et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020153436 Selic Oct 2002 A1
20030038192 Shutic et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030155325 Mansour et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040083980 Harding May 2004 A1
20040124282 Mansour et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050022483 Shutic et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050103019 Mansour et al. May 2005 A1
20050126476 Shutic et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050178851 Shutic et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060112589 Huttlin Jun 2006 A1
20060137315 Shutic et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070234586 Huettlin Oct 2007 A1
20070236693 Prociw et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070242871 Prociw et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080264784 Pecher et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090159461 McCutchen et al. Jun 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
109071 May 1984 EP
146680 Jul 1985 EP
172530 Feb 1986 EP
331111 Sep 1989 EP
378110 Jul 1990 EP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060112589 A1 Jun 2006 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/EP2004/010096 Sep 2004 US
Child 11267518 US