Apparatus for trialing a modular humeral head

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9872775
  • Patent Number
    9,872,775
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 10, 2014
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 23, 2018
    7 years ago
Abstract
The present disclosure is directed to a modular shoulder prosthesis measuring device having an adjustable radial offset provided by relative rotation of an adapter interdisposed between the stem and the head. Specifically, the interface configuration between the stem and the adapter, as well as between the adapter and the head are designed such that relative positioning of these components provides a continuous adjustment in the radial offset. Indicia are provided to precisely determine the magnitude and direction of the adjustment being made.
Description
FIELD

The present disclosure relates to a prosthesis for replacing and reconstructing a portion of the humerus and more specifically to a trialing system for a modular humeral prosthesis which allows for shoulder joint replacement.


BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates to a prosthesis for replacing and reconstructing a portion of the humerus and more specifically to a modular humeral prosthesis which allows for shoulder joint replacement.


The shoulder joint is considered to be one of the most complex joints in the body. The scapula, the clavicle and the humerus all meet at the shoulder joint. The head of the humerus fits into a shallow socket of the scapula called the glenoid fossa to form a mobile joint. When the joint is articulated, the humeral head moves in the glenoid fossa to provide a wide range of motion. The shoulder joint may suffer from various maladies including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, avascular necrosis, bone fracture or failure of previous joint implants. If severe joint damage occurs and no other means of treatment is found to be effective, then shoulder reconstruction may be necessary.


A shoulder joint prosthesis generally includes the replacement of the ball of the humerus and, optionally, the socket of the shoulder blade with specially designed artificial components. The bio-kinematics, and thus the range of motion in the shoulder vary greatly among prospective patients for reconstruction shoulder surgery. The humeral component typically has a metal shaft or stem with a body portion that is embedded in the resected humerus and a generally hemispherical head portion supported on the stem. The head slidingly engages a glenoid implant on the glenoid fossa. During reconstructive surgery, the components of the prosthesis are matched with the bio-kinematics of the patient in an effort to maintain the natural range of motion of a healthy shoulder joint. Thus, a shoulder prosthesis design must be readily adaptable to a wide range of bio-kinematics for prospective patients.


In this regard, shoulder prostheses are generally available as either unitary structures or modular components. With unitary shoulder prosthesis, a large inventory of differently sized prostheses must be maintained to accommodate the different bone sizes and joint configurations of the prospective patients. With such unitary shoulder prosthesis, the patient is typically evaluated by x-ray to determine the approximate prostheses size needed for reconstruction. A number of differently sized prostheses are selected as possible candidates based upon this preliminary evaluation. Final selection of the appropriately sized prosthesis is made during the surgery. With unitary shoulder prosthesis, each design may represent a compromise that is unable to achieve all of the natural range of motion of a healthy shoulder joint because of the fixed geometric configuration in their design.


Modular prostheses systems which reduce the need to maintain large inventories of various sized components are well known in the art. Conventionally, the humeral prosthesis includes two components—a humeral stem component and a spherical head releasably coupled to the stem. Alternately, a three component design is known in which the stem and shoulder are interconnected with an adapter. In either of the two-piece or three-piece designs, a radial offset or angulator inclination of the head relative to the stem is provided in individual components. Different radial offsets or angular inclinations are achieved through the use of different adapters or heads. In this regard, conventional modular shoulder prosthesis kits include multiple redundant components such as adapters and heads to achieve a range of prosthetic options.


While providing an advantage over the unitary design in reducing the number of components needed, a rather large inventory of head components and/or adapter components must be maintained to provide the desired range of geometric configurations with the conventional modular shoulder prostheses. These components are readily adaptable to provide a range of geometric configurations, i.e. radial offsets of angular inclination while minimizing the number of components required. There is, therefore, a need for a trialing system and method for determining which of these components are needed and their specific orientation.


SUMMARY

In accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure a modular joint prosthesis system is provided. Specifically, a humeral component for a shoulder prosthesis includes an adapter and a head component which cooperate to provide a range of radial offsets and/or angular inclinations and which are adapted to be used in conjunction with a stem.


According to one exemplary embodiment, a measuring instrument for humeral component for a shoulder prosthesis is provided for determining the needed adjustable radial offset of the head with respect to the stem. The present disclosure includes an adapter interposed between a stem and a head. The adapter is slidably coupled to the head such that relative linear positioning of the adapter on the head will effect a first adjustment in the radial offset. Likewise, the adapter component is rotationally coupled to the stem as such that relative angular position of the adapter will effect a rotational offset adjustment. By selectively positioning the adapter with respect to the head, an infinite adjustment of the radial offset within a given range may be achieved. Indicia are provided at the interface between the adapter and the head to indicate the offset vector (i.e., offset amount and direction).


According to another exemplary embodiment, a measuring instrument for a humeral component for a shoulder prosthesis is provided for determining the adjustable radial offset of the head with respect to the stem. The present disclosure includes an adapter interposed between a stem and a head. The adapter is slidably coupled to a cavity formed in the head such that relative linear positioning of the adapter on the head will effect a first adjustment in the radial offset of the head. Likewise, the adapter component is rotationally coupled to the stem as such that relative angular position of the stem on the adapter will effect a rotational offset adjustment. A fastener is provided to fix the location of the head to the adapter. In one example, indicia are provided on the adapter and the head to indicate the offset vector.


The joint prosthesis measurement system of the present disclosure provides great flexibility in the adjustment of important bio-kinematic parameters for the prosthesis systems while allowing for the minimizing the number of components required for the modular system. These and other features of the present disclosure will become apparent from the description and especially taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is an exploded front view of a modular shoulder prosthesis measurement system in accordance with the present teachings;



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the adapter and head components of the device illustrated in FIG. 1 shown in an assembled state;



FIG. 3 is a bottom view of the embodiment of the present teachings illustrated in FIG. 1;



FIGS. 4A-4C are views of the adapter shown in FIG. 1;



FIGS. 5A-5D are views of the head shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 6 represents the implantation of the measurement head into a stem component;



FIG. 7 is cross-sectional view of the trial head coupled to an implanted stem;



FIG. 8 is cross-sectional view of the trial head coupled to an implanted stem and being positioned into a glenoid;



FIGS. 9 and 10 represent the adjustment of the head with respect to the adapter; and



FIG. 11 represents a kit of components.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the present disclosure, its application, or uses.



FIG. 1 is an exploded front view of a modular shoulder prosthesis measurement system according to the present teachings. The measuring device 10 is formed of an adapter 12, a head 14, and a coupling member 16. The adapter 12 is preferably formed of a polymer material, which allow its relative rotation with respect to a fixation member or stem 18. The measuring device 10 is configured to determine both the needed radial offset of an implant head with respect to an implanted fixation member, and also the rotational offset of the head with respect to the fixation member. As further described below, the adapter 12 is slidably coupled to the head 14 such that relative linear positioning of the adapter 12 with the head 14 will affect a first adjustment in the radial offset. Selected positioning of the adapter 12 with respect to the head 14 gives an infinite adjustment of the radial offset within a given range.


Referring generally to FIG. 1, FIGS. 4A-4C and FIG. 6, the adapter 12 has a body portion 24, having a first pair of bearing surfaces 26 and 28. The first pair of bearing surfaces 26 and 28 are slidably coupled to a second pair of bearing surfaces 30 and 32 defined on the head 14. The body portion 24 further has a flat stop surface 35 and a circular stop surface 36 which function to limit the movement of the adapter 12 with respect to the head 14. The adapter 12 further defines a coupling member accepting bore 38 which is optionally threaded. A tapered coupling portion 40 is configured to interface with a Morse taper coupling feature on the stem 18. This tapered coupling portion 40, while shown as a male taper, may optionally be a female taper configured to interface with a male Morse taper formed on the stem 18 or any other connection member.


As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the bottom surface 34 of the adapter 12 and a bottom surface 22 of the head 14 each have indicia 46 and 48 which indicate the relative positioning of the head 14 with respect to the adapter 12. Additionally, the outer spherical surface 20 has the rotational indicia 43 which is used to determine the relative rotation of the head 14 with respect to the stem 18.



FIGS. 5A-5D represent the head 14 shown in FIG. 1. Defined on the bottom surface 22 is an adapter accepting cavity 50. The cavity 50 has the second pair of bearing surfaces 30 and 32. Additionally, the cavity 50 has flat and curved bearing surfaces 52 and 55 which are configured to interface with the flat and circular bearing surfaces 35 and 36 of the adapter.


The head 14 further defines a through bore 54. The through bore 54 passes through the outer spherical surface 20 and the adapter accepting cavity 50. The through bore 54 has a defined shelf 56 which is configured to support a head portion 57 of the coupling member 16. The through bore 54 further has a slot portion 58 and a circular portion 60 which facilitate transverse movement of the coupling member 16 within the through bore 54. As the cavity 50 has a length L1 which is longer than the length L2 of the adapter 12, the adapter 12 is configured to move transversely within the head 14. The difference in L1 and L2 is the distance of the linear offset of the system. The first pair of bearing surfaces 26 and 28 and second pair of bearing surfaces 30 and 32 are configured so as to prevent relative rotational movement between the adapter 12 and the head 14.



FIGS. 6-8 show views of the relationship of the measuring device 10 in its environmental surroundings. The tapered coupling portion 40 of the adapter 12 is positioned within the taper 42 of the stem 18. Coupling member 16 passes through the through bore 54 of the head 14 to loosely couple the head 14 to the adapter 12. After, the head 14 is then positioned against a glenoid 62 which can be natural or an implant, and the kinematic action of the head is then tested.


As seen in FIGS. 8 and 9, should a physician determine that adjustment is necessary, the radial offset 49 of the head 14 can be accomplished by moving it in a first degree of freedom relative to the adapter 12. After this adjustment is made, the physician will then tighten the coupling member 16 to fix the radial position of the head 14 with respect to the adapter 12. The physician can then use the indicia 46 and 48 on the lower stem engaging surface or bottom surface 34 of the adapter 12 and bottom surface 22 of the head 14 to determine the appropriate implant to use.


As seen in FIG. 9, the adapter 12 and head 14 can be rotated 51 in a second degree of freedom with respect to the stem 18. The rotational indicia 43 on the outer spherical surface 20 can be used to mark the relative location of the implant measuring device 10 with respect to the stem 18. This marking can optionally be made on the biologic tissue surrounding the stem 18. This relative rotation marking is then used by the physician to determine the rotational alignment of the offset implant prior to implantation.


The description of the disclosure is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the disclosure are intended to be within the scope of the disclosure. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. An adjustable prosthesis comprising: a stem having a proximal face;a humeral head having an articulation surface and a bottom face opposite the articulation surface, the bottom face defining an elongated aperture having first and second ends defining a generally flat interface surface; andan adapter interposed between the proximal face and the bottom face, the adapter defining a cylindrical coupling tapered portion having a centerline which is generally perpendicular to the interface surface, the adapter having a generally planar bearing surface configured to engage the interface surface so as to allow continuous linear movement of the generally planar bearing surface with respect to the interface surface and of the humeral head with respect to the adapter from a first position to a second position in a direction perpendicular to the centerline and within the elongated aperture, the adapter and elongated aperture defining a variable sized cavity therebetween when the generally planar bearing surface is engaged with the interface surface.
  • 2. The adjustable prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the adapter is rotationally positionable on the stem to provide a first adjustment and relatively linearly positionable to the head to provide a second adjustment so as to couple the head to the stem in a fixed orientation within a range of orientations defined by the first and second adjustments.
  • 3. The adjustable prosthesis of claim 2, wherein the range of orientations is a 1-5 mm radial offset.
  • 4. The adjustable prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the adapter is rotationally coupled to the stem such that relative angular positioning of the adapter on the stem will effect a first radial offset, and the adapter is linearly coupled to the head such that relative positioning of the adapter with respect to the head will effect a linear offset.
  • 5. The adjustable prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the adapter and the humeral head each include indicia that indicate a relative position of the humeral head with respect to the adapter.
  • 6. The adjustable prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the humeral head includes rotational indicia along the articulation surface for determining a relative rotation of the humeral head with respect to the stem.
  • 7. The adjustable prosthesis of claim 1, wherein a through bore is defined through the articulation surface of the head and is in communication with the elongated aperture to receive a coupling member to couple the humeral head to the adapter.
  • 8. The adjustable prosthesis of claim 7, wherein the through bore has a slot portion and a circular portion that facilitates transverse movement of the coupling member within the through bore.
  • 9. The adjustable prosthesis of claim 1, wherein the stem further comprises a taper coupling feature.
  • 10. The adjustable prosthesis of claim 9, wherein the cylindrical coupling tapered portion of the adapter is positionable within the taper coupling feature of the stem to couple the adapter to the stem.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/204,194, filed on Aug. 5, 2011, which is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/076,293 filed on Mar. 9, 2005, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,052,758. The entire disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (53)
Number Name Date Kind
3815157 Skorecki et al. Jun 1974 A
3869730 Skobel Mar 1975 A
3978528 Crep Sep 1976 A
4003095 Gristina Jan 1977 A
4040131 Gristina Aug 1977 A
4042980 Swanson et al. Aug 1977 A
4135517 Reale Jan 1979 A
4822370 Schelhas Apr 1989 A
4865605 Dines et al. Sep 1989 A
4865609 Roche Sep 1989 A
4919670 Dale et al. Apr 1990 A
4957510 Cremascoli Sep 1990 A
4963155 Lazzeri et al. Oct 1990 A
5080685 Bolesky et al. Jan 1992 A
5135529 Paxson et al. Aug 1992 A
5181928 Bolesky et al. Jan 1993 A
5201882 Paxson Apr 1993 A
5222984 Forte Jun 1993 A
5314479 Rockwood, Jr. et al. May 1994 A
5358526 Tornier Oct 1994 A
5507817 Craig et al. Apr 1996 A
5507824 Lennox Apr 1996 A
5549682 Roy Aug 1996 A
5580352 Sekel Dec 1996 A
5658340 Muller et al. Aug 1997 A
5702457 Walch et al. Dec 1997 A
5702486 Craig et al. Dec 1997 A
5728161 Camino et al. Mar 1998 A
5902340 White et al. May 1999 A
5910171 Kummer et al. Jun 1999 A
5961555 Huebner Oct 1999 A
6015437 Stossel Jan 2000 A
6033439 Camino et al. Mar 2000 A
6102953 Huebner Aug 2000 A
6129764 Servidio Oct 2000 A
6171341 Boileau et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197062 Fenlin Mar 2001 B1
6197063 Dews Mar 2001 B1
6206925 Tornier Mar 2001 B1
6228120 Leonard et al. May 2001 B1
6368352 Camino et al. Apr 2002 B1
6736852 Callaway et al. May 2004 B2
6749637 Bahler Jun 2004 B1
6942699 Stone et al. Sep 2005 B2
8052758 Winslow Nov 2011 B1
8647387 Winslow Feb 2014 B2
20010049561 Dews et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020016634 Maroney et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020156534 Grusin Oct 2002 A1
20030028253 Stone et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030149485 Tornier Aug 2003 A1
20040030394 Horber Feb 2004 A1
20040064188 Ball et al. Apr 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
19509037 Sep 1996 DE
0257359 Mar 1988 EP
0599429 Jun 1994 EP
0664108 Jul 1995 EP
0679375 Nov 1995 EP
0712617 May 1996 EP
0797964 Oct 1997 EP
2574283 Jun 1986 FR
2652498 Apr 1991 FR
2664809 Jan 1992 FR
2721200 Dec 1995 FR
WO-9522302 Aug 1995 WO
WO-9617553 Jun 1996 WO
WO-9846172 Oct 1998 WO
WO-0015154 Mar 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
Thabe et al., “Die endoprothetische Versorgung des rheumatischen Schultergelenkes,” Aktuelle Rheumatologie, vol. 19 (1994), pp. 155-160 (with English Abstract).
Thabe et al., “Modulares—Vario—Schulter,” 6 sheets of pictures.
“Buechel-Pappas Total Shoulder System,” Endotec, Jul. 1991.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Mar. 29, 2011.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Sep. 13, 2010.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Jan. 21, 2009.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Jun. 25, 2008.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Nov. 16, 2007.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Apr. 20, 2007.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/204,194, dated Mar. 27, 2013.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140156012 A1 Jun 2014 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13204194 Aug 2011 US
Child 14176693 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11076293 Mar 2005 US
Child 13204194 US