The present disclosure relates to a prosthesis for replacing and reconstructing a portion of the humerus and more specifically to a trialing system for a modular humeral prosthesis which allows for shoulder joint replacement.
The present disclosure relates to a prosthesis for replacing and reconstructing a portion of the humerus and more specifically to a modular humeral prosthesis which allows for shoulder joint replacement.
The shoulder joint is considered to be one of the most complex joints in the body. The scapula, the clavicle and the humerus all meet at the shoulder joint. The head of the humerus fits into a shallow socket of the scapula called the glenoid fossa to form a mobile joint. When the joint is articulated, the humeral head moves in the glenoid fossa to provide a wide range of motion. The shoulder joint may suffer from various maladies including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, avascular necrosis, bone fracture or failure of previous joint implants. If severe joint damage occurs and no other means of treatment is found to be effective, then shoulder reconstruction may be necessary.
A shoulder joint prosthesis generally includes the replacement of the ball of the humerus and, optionally, the socket of the shoulder blade with specially designed artificial components. The bio-kinematics, and thus the range of motion in the shoulder vary greatly among prospective patients for reconstruction shoulder surgery. The humeral component typically has a metal shaft or stem with a body portion that is embedded in the resected humerus and a generally hemispherical head portion supported on the stem. The head slidingly engages a glenoid implant on the glenoid fossa. During reconstructive surgery, the components of the prosthesis are matched with the bio-kinematics of the patient in an effort to maintain the natural range of motion of a healthy shoulder joint. Thus, a shoulder prosthesis design must be readily adaptable to a wide range of bio-kinematics for prospective patients.
In this regard, shoulder prostheses are generally available as either unitary structures or modular components. With unitary shoulder prosthesis, a large inventory of differently sized prostheses must be maintained to accommodate the different bone sizes and joint configurations of the prospective patients. With such unitary shoulder prosthesis, the patient is typically evaluated by x-ray to determine the approximate prostheses size needed for reconstruction. A number of differently sized prostheses are selected as possible candidates based upon this preliminary evaluation. Final selection of the appropriately sized prosthesis is made during the surgery. With unitary shoulder prosthesis, each design may represent a compromise that is unable to achieve all of the natural range of motion of a healthy shoulder joint because of the fixed geometric configuration in their design.
Modular prostheses systems which reduce the need to maintain large inventories of various sized components are well known in the art. Conventionally, the humeral prosthesis includes two components—a humeral stem component and a spherical head releasably coupled to the stem. Alternately, a three component design is known in which the stem and shoulder are interconnected with an adapter. In either of the two-piece or three-piece designs, a radial offset or angulator inclination of the head relative to the stem is provided in individual components. Different radial offsets or angular inclinations are achieved through the use of different adapters or heads. In this regard, conventional modular shoulder prosthesis kits include multiple redundant components such as adapters and heads to achieve a range of prosthetic options.
While providing an advantage over the unitary design in reducing the number of components needed, a rather large inventory of head components and/or adapter components must be maintained to provide the desired range of geometric configurations with the conventional modular shoulder prostheses. These components are readily adaptable to provide a range of geometric configurations, i.e. radial offsets of angular inclination while minimizing the number of components required. There is, therefore, a need for a trialing system and method for determining which of these components are needed and their specific orientation.
In accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure a modular joint prosthesis system is provided. Specifically, a humeral component for a shoulder prosthesis includes an adapter and a head component which cooperate to provide a range of radial offsets and/or angular inclinations and which are adapted to be used in conjunction with a stem.
According to one exemplary embodiment, a measuring instrument for humeral component for a shoulder prosthesis is provided for determining the needed adjustable radial offset of the head with respect to the stem. The present disclosure includes an adapter interposed between a stem and a head. The adapter is slidably coupled to the head such that relative linear positioning of the adapter on the head will effect a first adjustment in the radial offset. Likewise, the adapter component is rotationally coupled to the stem as such that relative angular position of the adapter will effect a rotational offset adjustment. By selectively positioning the adapter with respect to the head, an infinite adjustment of the radial offset within a given range may be achieved. Indicia are provided at the interface between the adapter and the head to indicate the offset vector (i.e., offset amount and direction).
According to another exemplary embodiment, a measuring instrument for a humeral component for a shoulder prosthesis is provided for determining the adjustable radial offset of the head with respect to the stem. The present disclosure includes an adapter interposed between a stem and a head. The adapter is slidably coupled to a cavity formed in the head such that relative linear positioning of the adapter on the head will effect a first adjustment in the radial offset of the head. Likewise, the adapter component is rotationally coupled to the stem as such that relative angular position of the stem on the adapter will effect a rotational offset adjustment. A fastener is provided to fix the location of the head to the adapter. In one example, indicia are provided on the adapter and the head to indicate the offset vector.
The joint prosthesis measurement system of the present disclosure provides great flexibility in the adjustment of important bio-kinematic parameters for the prosthesis systems while allowing for the minimizing the number of components required for the modular system. These and other features of the present disclosure will become apparent from the description and especially taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the present disclosure, its application, or uses.
Referring generally to
As shown in
The head 14 further defines a through bore 54. The through bore 54 passes through the outer spherical surface 20 and the adapter accepting cavity 50. The through bore 54 has a defined shelf 56 which is configured to support a head portion 57 of the coupling member 16. The through bore 54 further has a slot portion 58 and a circular portion 60 which facilitate transverse movement of the coupling member 16 within the through bore 54. As the cavity 50 has a length L1 which is longer than the length L2 of the adapter 12, the adapter 12 is configured to move transversely within the head 14. The difference in L1 and L2 is the distance of the linear offset of the system. The first pair of bearing surfaces 26 and 28 and second pair of bearing surfaces 30 and 32 are configured so as to prevent relative rotational movement between the adapter 12 and the head 14.
As seen in
As seen in
The description of the disclosure is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the disclosure are intended to be within the scope of the disclosure. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/204,194, filed on Aug. 5, 2011, which is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/076,293 filed on Mar. 9, 2005, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,052,758. The entire disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3815157 | Skorecki et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3869730 | Skobel | Mar 1975 | A |
3978528 | Crep | Sep 1976 | A |
4003095 | Gristina | Jan 1977 | A |
4040131 | Gristina | Aug 1977 | A |
4042980 | Swanson et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4135517 | Reale | Jan 1979 | A |
4822370 | Schelhas | Apr 1989 | A |
4865605 | Dines et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4865609 | Roche | Sep 1989 | A |
4919670 | Dale et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4957510 | Cremascoli | Sep 1990 | A |
4963155 | Lazzeri et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5080685 | Bolesky et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5135529 | Paxson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5181928 | Bolesky et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5201882 | Paxson | Apr 1993 | A |
5222984 | Forte | Jun 1993 | A |
5314479 | Rockwood, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5358526 | Tornier | Oct 1994 | A |
5507817 | Craig et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507824 | Lennox | Apr 1996 | A |
5549682 | Roy | Aug 1996 | A |
5580352 | Sekel | Dec 1996 | A |
5658340 | Muller et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5702457 | Walch et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702486 | Craig et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5728161 | Camino et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5902340 | White et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910171 | Kummer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5961555 | Huebner | Oct 1999 | A |
6015437 | Stossel | Jan 2000 | A |
6033439 | Camino et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6102953 | Huebner | Aug 2000 | A |
6129764 | Servidio | Oct 2000 | A |
6171341 | Boileau et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197062 | Fenlin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197063 | Dews | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206925 | Tornier | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228120 | Leonard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6368352 | Camino et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6736852 | Callaway et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749637 | Bahler | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6942699 | Stone et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
8052758 | Winslow | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8647387 | Winslow | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20010049561 | Dews et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020016634 | Maroney et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020156534 | Grusin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030028253 | Stone et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030149485 | Tornier | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040030394 | Horber | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064188 | Ball et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19509037 | Sep 1996 | DE |
0257359 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0599429 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0664108 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0679375 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0712617 | May 1996 | EP |
0797964 | Oct 1997 | EP |
2574283 | Jun 1986 | FR |
2652498 | Apr 1991 | FR |
2664809 | Jan 1992 | FR |
2721200 | Dec 1995 | FR |
WO-9522302 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO-9617553 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO-9846172 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-0015154 | Mar 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Thabe et al., “Die endoprothetische Versorgung des rheumatischen Schultergelenkes,” Aktuelle Rheumatologie, vol. 19 (1994), pp. 155-160 (with English Abstract). |
Thabe et al., “Modulares—Vario—Schulter,” 6 sheets of pictures. |
“Buechel-Pappas Total Shoulder System,” Endotec, Jul. 1991. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Mar. 29, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Sep. 13, 2010. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Jan. 21, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Jun. 25, 2008. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Nov. 16, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,293 dated Apr. 20, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/204,194, dated Mar. 27, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140156012 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13204194 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 14176693 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11076293 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 13204194 | US |