This application is a 371 U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2008/006369, filed Aug. 1, 2008. This application claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 07022926.5, filed Nov. 27, 2007. The disclosures of such applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to an improved apparatus for unscrambling and aligning preforms. This apparatus is used, for example, for feeding preforms to a machine, like a blow-moulding machine for making plastic containers.
In the field of plastic packaging, a well-known technique widely used for manufacturing plastic containers is the two stages injection and blow-moulding technique. In a first stage, plastic preforms are moulded by injection in an injection machine. A preform has a substantially tubular body that is closed at one bottom end and is opened at the other upper end. A preform also comprises a neck support ring in its upper part, close to its opened mouth. In a second stage, the preforms are fed to a blow-moulding machine that is used for making bi-axially oriented containers by stretching and blowing each preform in a mould.
In this two stages injection and blow-moulding technique, the injection machine for manufacturing the preforms and the blowing-moulding machine for manufacturing the containers from the preforms are two independent machines. In such case, a feeding system of the type illustrated in
More particularly, such a feeding system comprises an apparatus for unscrambling and aligning the preforms, and generally referred as “unscrambler”. An unscrambler generally comprises two rotary alignment rollers which are inclined to the horizontal and which are substantially parallel to each other. These two rollers are separated from each others in such a way to leave a space along and between the rollers for the body of the preforms. The distance between the two rollers is however sufficiently small for enabling the two rollers to retain the preforms by their neck support ring.
In operation, the preforms fall under the effect of gravity onto the alignment rollers which are driven in rotation in opposite directions. Under the combined effect of gravity and rotation of the alignment rollers, the preforms tend to move and to be oriented between the rollers in an upright position. Correctly oriented preforms are thus aligned and supported on the two rollers by their neck support ring, while the body of the preforms hangs down between the rollers. The aligned and correctly oriented preforms slide under the effect of gravity along the inclined alignment rollers down to a downstream machine, and for example a blow-moulding machine.
In order to improve orientation and positioning of the preforms between the alignment rollers, unscramblers of the prior art further comprise a rotary bladed wheel which is mounted above the two alignment rollers. The axis of rotation of this bladed wheel is transverse, more preferably substantially perpendicular, to the axis of rotation of the rollers. In operation, the bladed wheel is driven in rotation at a pre-established speed in such a way that the blades of the wheel sweep the space above the rollers and push back preforms that are not correctly oriented and positioned between the two rollers, and also nested preforms that can be correctly oriented and supported by the roller by the neck support ring of the lower preform. The principle of this rotary bladed wheel is that statistically the preforms become in theory correctly oriented and positioned after a certain number of pushes.
In practise, the usual unscramblers with rotary bladed wheel often malfunction. Actually, in operation some preforms (a preform alone or nested preforms) that are not correctly oriented are not pushed back by the wheel, then slide beyond the bladed wheel and are never correctly oriented on the alignment rollers. Such incorrectly oriented preforms (preforms alone or nested preforms) cause a jam at the output of the unscramblers. It happens also that nested preforms that are correctly oriented on the alignment rollers are not pushed back by the wheel and slide beyond the bladed wheel. Such correctly oriented but nested preforms also cause a jam at the output of the unscramblers. These jams may lead to a stoppage of the feed of preforms at the input of the downstream machine (for example a blow-moulding machine) and may cause a prejudicial shutdown of this machine. When a jam occurs, a fastidious manual intervention is required for removing the jammed preform(s).
The objective of the invention is to propose a simple and efficient solution to increase the reliability of aforesaid unscramblers of the prior art and to decrease the number of preform jams downstream from such unscramblers.
This objective is achieved by the apparatus for unscrambling and aligning preforms as defined in claim 1.
This apparatus of the invention is characterized by at least one of the following characteristics (i) or (ii):
By the wording “correctly oriented preform”, it is meant therein that the preform is supported and suspended in its upright position onto the alignment rollers by its neck support ring. The wording “incorrectly oriented preform” used therein means any other orientation of a preform, wherein the preform does not fulfil the above definition of “correctly oriented preform”. By the wording “correctly oriented nested preforms”, it is meant therein that the preforms are nested and are supported and suspended in their upright position onto the alignment rollers by the neck support ring of the lower preform. The wording “incorrectly oriented nested preforms” used therein means any other orientation of nested preforms that does not fulfil the above definition of “correctly oriented nested preforms”.
In one variant, only the said characteristic (i) can be implemented. In another variant, only the said characteristic (ii) can be implemented. In another variant, both characteristics (i) and (ii) can be implemented.
When both characteristics (i) and (ii) are implemented, the guiding means are preferably positioned upstream from the stopping means, and more particularly extend downwards to the said stopping means.
Other optional technical characteristics of the apparatus of the invention are defined in the appended claims.
A further object of the invention is a feed system for feeding aligned and correctly oriented preforms to a downstream machine, said feed system comprising a bin for storing preforms in bulk, a feed-elevator for removing the preforms from the bin and for lifting up the preforms and dropping the preforms at a pre-established rate into an aforesaid apparatus of the invention for unscrambling and aligning preforms.
A further object of the invention is the use of the aforesaid apparatus of the invention for feeding aligned and correctly oriented preforms to a downstream machine, more especially a blow-moulding machine.
A further object of the invention is a system for manufacturing blow-moulded plastic containers, and comprising a blow-moulding machine and an apparatus of the invention for feeding the blow-moulding machine with aligned and correctly oriented preforms.
The characteristics and advantages of the invention will appear more clearly on reading the following detailed description which is made by way of non-exhaustive and non-limiting example, and with reference to the appended drawings, as follows:
Referring to
This apparatus 12 comprises a trough 120 and two rotary alignment rollers 121 which are mounted inside the trough 120. The axis of rotation 121a of each roller 121 is inclined to the horizontal. Referring to
In operation, the two rollers are driven in rotation in two opposite directions (FIG. 5/arrows F). Under the effect of gravity, the preforms P fall in the trough 120 onto the alignment rollers 121. Under the combined effects of gravity and rotation of the alignment rollers 121, the preforms P tend to move and to be oriented between the rollers 121 in an upright position (
The sliding direction of the preforms onto the rollers 121 through the unscrambling and aligning apparatus 12 is identified by arrow A on the figures. The words “upstream” and “downstream” used therein are defined in reference to this sliding direction A.
The apparatus 12 further comprises rotary pushing means 122 which are mounted above the two rotary rollers 121. These rotary pushing means 122 are used for pushing back preforms that are not correctly oriented and positioned between the two rollers 121 (like preforms P′ on
In the particular variant of
In practise, such a bladed wheel 122, when used alone, is however not reliable, and in operation some preforms that are not correctly oriented or some nested preforms can slide down beyond the bladed wheel 122 and provoke a prejudicial jam on the feed rail 13.
According to the invention, in order to increase the reliability of the unscrambling and aligning apparatus 12, a novel guide 3 is mounted above the rollers 121 and is used in combination with the rotary pushing means 122.
In the variant of
At its upstream end, the guide 3 comprises an upper L-shaped cut 33. In the region of this cut 33, the guide 3 has no upper wall, but has only upstream sidewalls 34 of smaller height h which are an extension of the main sidewalls 30. Referring to
Referring to
In the particular variant of
In reference to
In reference to
In reference to
Then under pressure of the other preforms that are continuously fed behind, the stopped nested preforms P4/P5 are most often lifted up onto the upper edges 34b of the sidewall 34, and are thus brought upwardly into contact with the rotary blades 122b of the wheel 122, and pushed back for recycling by the bladed wheel 122.
Once the nested preforms P4/P5 are positioned onto the upper edges 34 of the sidewalls 34, they are stopped vertically by the upper edges 34a and are thus necessarily maintained at level that is sufficiently close to the rotary blade 122b for obtaining a reliable push back of the preforms by the blades.
Furthermore, once the nested preforms P4/P5 are positioned onto the upper edges 34b of the sidewalls 34, they can not slide down beyond the wheel 122 because they are stopped at least by the upstream front edge 31c of the upper wall 31.
In some cases, it may also happen that under the pressure of the preforms that are continuously fed behind, nested preforms P4/P5 that have been stopped by the front edges 34a are displaced in such a way that the lower preform P4 becomes correctly oriented and positioned between rollers 121. In that case, the correctly oriented nested preforms P4/P5 can pass trough the sidewalls 34, with the neck support ring C of the lower preform P4 being guided between the lower edges 35 of the sidewalls 34 and the rollers 121. In such a case, if the nested preforms P4/P5 reach the upper wall 31 of the guide 3, they are necessarily stopped by the front edge 31c of said upper wall 31 (same case than for nested preforms P2/P3 on
If an incorrectly oriented preform alone slides on the rollers 121 down to the guide 3, it is also firstly stopped by the front edges 34a of the two sidewalls 34 of smaller height h, and then most often lifted up onto the upper edges 34b of the sidewalls 34 and brought upwardly into contact with the blades 122b of the wheel, and then necessarily pushed back for recycling by the bladed wheel 122. In some cases, it may also happen that under pressure of the preforms that are continuously fed behind, an incorrectly oriented preform that has been stopped by the front edges 34a is displaced in such a way that it becomes correctly oriented and positioned between rollers 21, without being lifted up onto the upper edges 34b of the sidewalls 34. In such a case, this correctly oriented preform slides down through the guide 3 underneath the lower edge 35 of the guide 3 without being stopped by the front edge 31c (like preform P1 on
Preferably, the front edges 34a of the sidewalls 34 are designed in order to facilitate the lifting of a preform or nested preforms onto the upper edges 34b under the pressure of the other preforms continuously fed behind. In particular, in reference to
The invention is not limited to the use of a guide 3 having the particular structure that has been described in reference to the appended drawings, but the scope of protection encompasses any apparatus having the characteristics defined in the claims. In particular, the guide 3 is not necessarily made of one piece, but can be constituted by a monolithic assembly. In another variant of the invention, the guide 3 could be made of two separated elements: upstream guiding means 34 for lifting up incorrectly oriented preforms or incorrectly oriented nested preforms and separated downstream stopping means 30, 31. In another variant, the downstream stopping means could be made only of one stop like the upper wall 31 (i.e. without the sidewalls 30). In another variant of the invention, the guide 3 could be only constituted by the sidewalls 30 and upper wall 31 (i.e. without the sidewalls 34 of smaller height) or could be only constituted by the sidewalls 34 of smaller height h (i.e. without the use of stopping means 30, 31 downstream from the axis of rotation of the rotary pushing means 122). On the drawings, the front edges 34a of the sidewalls 34 are positioned underneath the rotary pushing means 122. In another variant, theses front edges 34a could be also positioned upstream from the rotary pushing means 122.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07022926 | Nov 2007 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/006369 | 8/1/2008 | WO | 00 | 5/25/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/068121 | 6/4/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2615556 | Hoopes et al. | Oct 1952 | A |
2988247 | Garrett | Jun 1961 | A |
RE25297 | Garrett | Dec 1962 | E |
3346095 | Dixon | Oct 1967 | A |
3517797 | Daleffe et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
4223778 | Kontz | Sep 1980 | A |
4224459 | Froberg | Sep 1980 | A |
4244459 | Garrett | Jan 1981 | A |
4418482 | Aidlin et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
5186307 | Doudement et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
6968936 | Charpentier | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7337893 | Charpentier | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7887319 | Takatomi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20070108018 | Charpentier | May 2007 | A1 |
20080226763 | Charpentier | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 864 050 | Jun 2005 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100255142 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |