The present invention relates generally to image guided surgery and more particularly relates to a kit of parts, and the individual parts of the kit, for use in navigation during a surgical procedure.
Over one million CT-guided biopsies are performed per year in the US. There are two million ultrasound-guided biopsies a year. Many of these ultrasound biopsies are performed because computerized tomography (“CT”) is not available. Ultrasound is also traditionally faster than CT, as there is the availability of substantially real time imaging. Traditionally, CT required the acquisition of an image, the passage of a needle, the acquisition of another image and the repositioning of the needle to be checked by acquisition of another image. With this process a biopsy could take hours and it was hard to keep track of the needle tip relative to the patient and know if it was necessary to angle up or down to get to the target.
The recent availability of CT fluoroscopy has radically changed management of patients. With CT fluoroscopy, cross sectional images of the body are obtained which are refreshed up to thirteen times a second. Further increases in the refresh rate are believed by the inventors to be a reasonable expectation. With some CT scanners three slices can be presented simultaneously, all being refreshed thirteen times a second. This can create a substantially flicker-free image of a needle or device being passed into the patient. This has the potential to increase speed, accuracy and ability to safely deliver needles to sensitive or delicate structures and avoid large blood vessels.
However, there are drawbacks and limitations to CT fluoroscopy. These mainly relate to issues of infection due to the procedure and radiation safety for the physician. For example, during the passage of the needle by the physician's hands into the patient under substantially real time x-ray guidance, the physician's hand is in the x-ray beam. This can result in an accumulation of excessive radiation dose to the physician's hand. The physician may perform the procedure repeatedly during his career or even during a single day and this cumulative dose becomes an issue of personal radiation safety.
Furthermore, current biopsy needles are composed of metal (e.g., stainless steel that generates significant artifacts when used with x-ray detectors of CT quality. These artifacts are related to the density of the metals used in these needles. These artifacts are called beam-hardening artifacts. These artifacts can obscure the intended target or obscure an important structure and possibly make it possible for inadvertent injury of the target. Accordingly, current biopsy needles are not generally suitable for CT image guided surgical procedures.
A further disadvantage of the prior art is that needles that are currently used for biopsies typically have the stylet attached to the trocar loosely, yet such a loose attachment can present certain hazards when using such a needle under CT imaging.
A further disadvantage of the prior art is that, since CT machines are typically used for simple capturing of images, they are typically non-sterile, and therefore, under CT image guidance procedures, elaborate sterilization can be necessary to reduce risk of patient infection. Simplified sterilization techniques are therefore desirable.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a kit of parts for image guided surgical procedures that obviates or mitigates at least one of the above-identified disadvantages of the prior art. In an aspect of the invention there is provided a sterile needle holder that allows the transmission of force from the physician's hand to the needle so that the needle can be guided into the patient without requiring the physician to have his hand in the x-ray beam during the procedure. It is presently preferred that the needle holder be made from materials such that artifacts are not generated (or artifacts are desirably reduced) that would obscure the target. (i.e. radio lucent).
It is therefore desirable to provide needles of decreased density. The unit of density used for CT is the Hounsfield unit after the inventor of CT, Sir Godfrey Newbold Hounsfield. Hounsfield units quantify the radiopacity (i.e., radiodensity) of a material —that is, the extent to which the material impedes the passage of radiation such as the x-rays used in CT. The radiopacity of a material under CT scanning, in Hounsfield units, is generally proportional to the physical densisty of the material (see Kim S, Lee GH, Lee S, Park SH, Pyo HB, Chos JS, “Body fat measurement in computed tomography image”, Biomed Sci Instrum. 1999; 35: pages 303-308. A Hounsfield unit of zero is attributed to the density of water on CT, bone is higher in density than water, fat is lower in density than water. Fat therefore has a negative Hounsfield number. According to an aspect of the invention there is provided needles that are composed of metals or composites that are visible on CT but have a reduced likelihood of showing artifacts under CT. Needles are composed of two parts, an outer trocar and an inner stylet. Either one or the other or both can be made of diminished Hounsfield unit density material. It can be thus desirable to construct a stylet made of carbon fiber or plastic. Aluminium or Initinol or Inconel198 , are metals that are MRI compatible and may be valuable for CT purposes while at the same time being useful for MRI.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a biopsy needle wherein the stylet is attached to the trocar via a locking means or attachment means, such as a Luer Lock™ or a simple screw system. The locking biopsy needle is thus used under CT image guidance, advanced using the needle holder. The locking needle thus can be unlocked at the desired time and reduce the likelihood of trauma or injury to the patient during navigation under CT image guidance.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a drape that reduces contamination of the operator's hand against the side of the CT scanner. For conventional angiography, a sterilized plastic bag with an elasticated top is placed around the image intensifier and used like a sack. In a CT machine, there is provided a donut-shaped configuration and the patient passes through the central hole of the donut. Preferably, such a drape is disposable, but re-sterilizable drapes are also within the scope of the invention. It is presently preferred that the drape would be like a basketball hoop. In this particular implementation of this aspect of the invention, the basketball-hoop like drape is attachable to the open ends of the CT scanner by any suitable attachment means, such as either or a combination of a) adhesive, b) preplaced hoops affixed to the CT scanner and whereby such hoops would attach by an elasticated band to the drape; c) the drape could be made from a metal that is foldable and therefore transportable, though when released from its package would have a radial force such that it would affix the drape to either side of the CT scanner. Such a material could be Nitinol, from Nitrol Devices and Components, 47533 Westinghouse Drive, Fremont, Calif. 94539.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a kit for use in CT guided image fluoroscopy, comprising: (1) a needle holder for keeping the operator's hand out of the beam; (2) a needle of diminished beam hardening artifact inducing potential; (3) a lock to fix the stylet with regard to the trocar in an appropriate position; and (4) a drape to protect the operator's hand from contamination.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a kit of parts for use in an image guided surgical procedure using a substantially real time imaging machine comprising: a needle holder having a grasping means and a handle depending therefrom, the handle being configured such that the grasping means can be exposed to the imaging beam and an operator's hand can be distal from the imaging beam in relation to the grasping means; a needle attachable to the grasping means and having a rigidity to travel through mammalian tissue to a target area and having a radioopacity that substantially preserves an appearance of the needle when the needle is viewed on a display of the real time imaging machine; and a sleeve for attachment to the real time imaging machine that provides a substantially sterile operating environment for using the needle when attached to the machine.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, a locking mechanism is associated with at least one of the grasping means and the needle for releasably locking the needle to the needle holder.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a surgical instrument for use in an image guided surgical procedure using a substantially real time imaging machine comprising: a needle holder having a grasping means and a handle depending therefrom, the handle being configured such that the grasping means can be exposed to the imaging beam and an operator's hand can be kept a distance away from the imaging beam; and a needle attachable to the grasping means and having a rigidity to travel through mammalian tissue to a target area and having a radioopacity that substantially preserves an appearance of the needle when the needle is viewed on a display of the real time imaging machine.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, the needle is a trocar comprising a cannula and a stylet receivable within the cannula.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, a locking mechanism is associated with at least one of the grasping means and the needle for releasably locking the needle to the needle holder.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a sterile drape for attachment to a real time imaging machine comprising: a sheet of material for providing a substantially sterile barrier between the imaging machine and a patient; and an attachment means for affixing the drape to the imaging machine.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, the sheet of material is plastic and substantially tubular.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, the imaging machine has a pair of annular lips that flare outwardly from a respective opening of the machine and wherein the attachment means comprises an annular shaped elastic integral with each open respective ends of the sheet, each of the elastics for grasping a respective lip.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, the drape is umbrella-like, in that the material is plastic and the attachment means is a series of series of rods integrally affixed to the plastic, the rods made from a springed material such that the sleeve has a first position wherein the sleeve is collapsed and a second position wherein the sleeve is outwardly springed.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, the material is nitinol and the attachment means is achieved through configuring the nitinol to be outwardly springed.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, the attachment means is selected from the group consisting of velcro, ties, or snaps.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided an imaging machine comprising a channel for receiving a patient and exposing the patient to a substantially real time imaging beam. The machine also includes an attachment means for affixing a sterile drape to the channel, such that when the sterile drape is attached thereto a substantially sterile barrier between the channel and the patient is provided, thereby providing a substantially sterile environment for the patient.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, the attachment means is comprised of a pair of annular lips flanged so as to provide a secure attachment to a pair of annular elastized openings of a sterile sleeve.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, the beam is selected from the group consisting of CT, MRI, and X-Ray.
In a particular implementation of the foregoing aspect, a refresh rate of the real-time imaging beam is greater than, or equal to, about thirteen frames per second. The rate can be greater than about thirty frames per second. The rate can also be greater than about fifty frames per second. In other implementations, however, it is contemplated that the refresh rate can be as low as about one frame per second, depending on the actual procedure being performed and/or the imaging device being used.
Embodiments of the invention will now be discussed, by way of example only, with reference to the attached Figures, in which:
Referring now to
As will be understood by those of skill in the art, chassis 34 in
Thus, machine 30 is further characterized by a pair of annular lips 42a and 42b, (or other attachment means) that flare outwardly from a respective opening of channel 38 and away from chassis 34. Each lip 42 attaches to chassis 34 at the periphery of channel 38, where channel 38 meets chassis 34 at the ends of machine 30. Further details on machine 30 and lips 42 and its use will be discussed in greater detail later below.
Referring now to
Sleeve 46 is thus further characterized by a pair of annular openings 50a and 50b interconnected by a continuous plastic sheet 54. Each opening 50a and 50b is further characterized by an elastic 58a and 58b encased within the sleeve at the periphery of its respective opening 50a and 50b.
Referring again to
Referring now to
It will now be understood that sleeve 46 and machine 30 are complementary to each other, and thus, the various components and dimensions of sleeve 46 are chosen to correspond with the complementary parts on machine 30. Thus, for example, elastics 58 are chosen to have a material and elasticity such that assembly of the sleeve at an opening 50 to a corresponding lip 42 can be performed with relative ease. In other words, the elasticity is chosen so that the person performing the assembly will not have to apply undue force to actually expand elastic 58 and fit it around lip 42. By the same token the elasticity of elastic 58 is sufficiently strong to ensure a reliable attachment of the sleeve at opening 50 to the corresponding lip 42 during the capturing of images or performance of a surgical procedure under image guidance. Furthermore the diameter of sheet 54 is chosen so as to not substantially reduce the diameter of channel 38 after assembly. The material of sheet 54 is also chosen so as to not interfere with the imaging beam generated by machine 30.
It should also now be understood that sheet 54 can be constructed in different shapes to complement different types and shapes of imaging machines that are capable of providing substantially real time images and thereby could benefit from the sterile sleeve of the present invention. In particular, sheet 54 may only have one opening 50, depending on the type of imaging machine with which it is used. By the same token, it will be understood that any variety of mechanical substitutes to the cooperating lips 42 and elastics 58 can be provided, and that such substitutes are within the scope of the invention. Thus, in general, any cooperating attachment means between sleeve 46 and machine 30 can be provided, and such varied cooperating attachment means are within the scope of the invention. For example, hooks and loops, velcro, ties, and/or snap-buttons or the like can be used as cooperating attachment means. By the same token, it is to be understood that lip 42 (or any suitable mechanical equivalent) can be retrofitted onto existing CT machines, or built directly thereto, as desired.
Furthermore, the location of the cooperating attachment means on machine 30 and sleeve 46 need not necessarily be limited to the respective distal ends of machine 30 and sleeve 46, but need only result in the ability to assemble sleeve 46 to machine 30 while leaving a suitable and appropriately substantially sterile passageway within channel 38 for receiving a patient. In another variation of the foregoing, sleeve 46 could be made from a rigid material, or an outwardly springed material, to thereby obviate the need for lip 42 or any means of attachment actually connected to machine 30.
Referring now to
Needle holder 104 is typically made of a plastic or other material that does not appear under CT image guidance (or under the imaging beam of the particular imaging machine being used). Holder 104 is comprised of a handle portion 120 and a grasping portion 124. In a present embodiment, handle portion 120 depends from grasping portion at an angle “A” greater than about ninety degrees, however, handle portion 120 can actually depend from grasping portion 124 at ninety-degrees or any other desired angle, depending on the procedure being performed, and the preferences of the surgeon or other medical professional performing the procedure. In a present embodiment, handle portion 120 is substantially cylindrical, but can be any desired shape and length, again depending on the preferences and/or needs of the procedure and/or surgeon. Grasping portion 124 is also substantially cylindrical, but is further characterized by a hollow channel 130 through which cannula 116 can be passed, and it is presently preferred the hollow channel 130 is of a slightly larger diameter than cannula 116 to securely hold cannula 116 within grasping portion 124. In a present embodiment, grasping portion 124 includes a set of interior threads 128 located on the portion of grasping portion 124 located nearest handle portion 120.
Cannula 116 is comprised of a hollow shaft 132 with a tip 136. Tip 136 has a desired shape for piercing the target area of the patient in a desired manner. It is presently preferred that shaft 132 be made from a material that is hard enough to pierce the patient's target area, yet also made from a material that presents reduced and/or minimal artifacts when shaft 132 is viewed under a CT imaging beam using a CT machine, (such as machine 30 shown in
Cannula 116 is also characterized by a set of exterior threads 138 towards the proximal end 140 of cannula 116 opposite from tip 136. Exterior threads 138 are thus complementary to interior threads 128 of grasping portion 124, such that trocar 108 can be releasably secured to grasping portion 124. Cannula 116 is also characterized by a set of interior threads 144 at the proximal end 140 of cannula 116, proximal end 140 also being made from a material that presents reduced and/or minimal artifacts when viewed under a CT imaging beam such that appearance of proximal end 140 is substantially preserved when viewed under such an imaging beam.
Stylet 112 is comprised of a needle having a solid shaft 148 including a point 152 at its distal end. Point 152 is complementary to tip 136, and the length of shaft 148 is substantially the same length as shaft 132, such that when stylet 112 is inserted within and assembled to cannula 116, point 152 and tip 136 form a contiguous shape. Solid shaft 148 is preferably made from substantially the same material as shaft 132, such that shaft 148 is hard enough and/or rigid to pierce a target area T within the patient, yet also made from a material that presents reduced and/or minimal artifacts and/or no artifacts when shaft 132 is viewed under a CT imaging beam using a CT machine, (such as machine 30 shown in
Stylet 112 is also characterized by a set of exterior threads 156 at the proximal end 160 of stylet 112 opposite from point 152. Proximal end 160 is also made from a material that presents reduced and/or minimal artifacts when viewed under a CT imaging beam, again, such that appearance of proximal end 160 is substantially preserved when viewed under such an imaging beam. Exterior threads 156 are thus complementary to interior threads 144, such that stylet 112 can be releasably secured to cannula 116.
As discussed above, the materials from which one or both of cannula 116 and stylet 112 are manufactured have lower radiopacity (that is, lower Hounsfield values) as compared to conventional needle components (which are generally stainless steel) in order to reduce the incidence of artifacts under CT imaging. The material from which one or both of cannula 116 and stylet 112 are manufactured is selected from the group including aluminum, carbon fiber, plastic, nitinol and Inconel. Known examples of plastics include nylon, Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), also known as Lucite or acrylic), Polyethe ether ketone (PEEK), polycarbonate and polyethylene.
Table 1 lists Hounsfield values for various materials (see van der Glas M. “Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging”, 2000; Summerscales J, “Non-destructive testing of fibre- reinforced plastics composites, Volume 2”; Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 1990; page 208; and Chen-Yuan C. ei al., “Beam Hardening Correction for Computed Tomography Images Using a Postreconstruction Method and Equivalent Tissue Concept”, Journal of Digital Imaging, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2001, pp. 54-61):
As seen in Table 1, materials such as plastics, carbon and aluminum, from which one or both of cannula 116 and stylet 112 can been made, have lower Hounsfield values than other metals such as iron, and also present reduced artifacts under CT imaging. Aluminum, PMMA and carbon have lower physical densities than iron and stainless steel.
Use of apparatus 100 is represented in FIG. I and
It is to be understood that various combinations, subsets and equivalents can be employed in the foregoing description of apparatus 100. For example, any one or more of pairs of threads 156 and 144, or 138 and 128, can be reversed and/or substituted for a Luer-Lock™ system. Furthermore, any one of pairs of threads 156 and 144, or 138 and 128 could be replaced by a clamping mechanism. For example, grasping portion 124 could be replaced with a mechanical clamp that surrounds proximal end 140 of cannula 116.
Referring now to
While only specific combinations of the various features and components of the present invention have been discussed herein, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that desired subsets of the disclosed features and components and/or alternative combinations of these features and components can be utilized, as desired. For example, while the embodiments discussed herein refer to CT machines, it is to be understood that the teachings herein can be applied to any type of imaging machine capable of generating substantially real time images, such as machines based computerized tomography (“CT”), magnetic resonance (“MR”), or X-Ray.
The above-described embodiments of the invention are intended to be examples of the present invention and alterations and modifications may be effected thereto, by those of skill in the art, without departing from the scope of the invention which is defined solely by the claims appended hereto.
This application is a Continuation Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/190,830 filed on Jul. 26, 2011, which is a Divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/081,494 filed on Mar. 17, 2005, which is a Divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/373,835 filed Feb. 27, 2003, now abandoned, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/366,530 filed Mar. 25, 2002 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/366,529 filed Mar. 25, 2002 the entire disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3721997 | Mundt | Mar 1973 | A |
3984696 | Collica et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4062518 | Stivender et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4258722 | Sessions | Mar 1981 | A |
4391276 | Lazarus et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4465069 | Barbier et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4533356 | Bengmark et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4610671 | Luther | Sep 1986 | A |
4655226 | Lee | Apr 1987 | A |
4686962 | Haber | Aug 1987 | A |
4732933 | Maeda et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4739762 | Palmaz | Apr 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
4795458 | Regan | Jan 1989 | A |
4940458 | Cohn | Jul 1990 | A |
4994066 | Voss | Feb 1991 | A |
5037427 | Harada et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5058577 | Six | Oct 1991 | A |
5064435 | Porter | Nov 1991 | A |
5067957 | Jervis | Nov 1991 | A |
5084022 | Claude | Jan 1992 | A |
5102417 | Palmaz | Apr 1992 | A |
5147308 | Singer | Sep 1992 | A |
5169386 | Becker et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5211165 | Dumoulin et al. | May 1993 | A |
5242455 | Skeens et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5250035 | Smith et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5292339 | Stephens et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5311883 | Sherman | May 1994 | A |
5335663 | Oakley et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5403341 | Solar | Apr 1995 | A |
5444871 | Lopez | Aug 1995 | A |
5482043 | Zulauf | Jan 1996 | A |
5492130 | Chiou | Feb 1996 | A |
5499418 | Tan et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5522881 | Lentz | Jun 1996 | A |
5522882 | Gaterud et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531737 | Schade | Jul 1996 | A |
5545150 | Danks et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546961 | Harrison | Aug 1996 | A |
5549439 | Ploem | Aug 1996 | A |
5549635 | Solar | Aug 1996 | A |
5556414 | Turi | Sep 1996 | A |
5562726 | Chuter | Oct 1996 | A |
5575798 | Koutrouvelis | Nov 1996 | A |
5590655 | Hussman | Jan 1997 | A |
5591195 | Taheri et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5592952 | Bohn | Jan 1997 | A |
5607467 | Froix | Mar 1997 | A |
5609629 | Fearnot et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5638819 | Manwarring et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5676159 | Navis | Oct 1997 | A |
5693015 | Walker et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702682 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5725572 | Lam et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735892 | Meyers et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741333 | Frid | Apr 1998 | A |
5746765 | Kleshinski et al. | May 1998 | A |
5772669 | Vrba | Jun 1998 | A |
5782764 | Werne | Jul 1998 | A |
5788626 | Thompson | Aug 1998 | A |
5788707 | Del Toro et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797952 | Klein | Aug 1998 | A |
5800517 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810870 | Myers et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824045 | Alt | Oct 1998 | A |
5857997 | Cimino et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861033 | Martakos et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876448 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892238 | Huttner et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899935 | Ding | May 1999 | A |
5902254 | Magram | May 1999 | A |
5906618 | Larson, III | May 1999 | A |
5908405 | Imran | Jun 1999 | A |
5922020 | Klein et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925074 | Gingras et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5957974 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980565 | Jayaraman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989280 | Euteneuer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010529 | Herweck et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6059759 | Mottola et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086610 | Duerig | Jul 2000 | A |
6120536 | Ding et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126654 | Giba et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146418 | Berman | Nov 2000 | A |
6179878 | Duerig et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6236875 | Bucholz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270523 | Herweck et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283125 | McNeirney et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285902 | Kienzle, III et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298110 | Ning | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315791 | Gingras | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325538 | Heesch | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352561 | Leopold et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355058 | Pacetti et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374937 | Galando et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379302 | Kessman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400979 | Stoianovici et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412851 | Burks et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423089 | Gingras et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428557 | Hilaire | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447540 | Fontaine et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453185 | O'Keefe | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456684 | Mun et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475234 | Richter | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6475235 | Jayaraman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481888 | Morgan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490467 | Bucholz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6490475 | Seeley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511471 | Roseman et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6530933 | Yeung et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533806 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544041 | Damadian | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6578219 | Gabel et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585677 | Cowan, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6585755 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6629992 | Bigus et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635064 | U et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656213 | Solem | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679886 | Weikel et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6689125 | Keith et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6716238 | Elliot | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734937 | Nakasogi et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740113 | Vrba | May 2004 | B2 |
6857778 | Mun et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6932787 | Cowan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6961606 | DeSilets et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7391042 | Goldstein | Jun 2008 | B2 |
8317727 | Peliks | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8622924 | Speeg et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628475 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9149293 | Hardert et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20010041928 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002383 | Sepetka et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022825 | Saitou et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020040239 | Murayama et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052640 | Bigus et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077540 | Kienzle | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020183610 | Foley et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183763 | Callol et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196906 | Mun et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004563 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040073286 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082905 | Solar et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040148000 | Bilge | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040176682 | Murphy | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176833 | Pavcnik et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176835 | Vrba | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040241094 | Chung et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060104999 | Chung et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060134144 | Chung et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080182282 | Markman et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2471958 | Jun 2003 | CA |
003405837 | Oct 1985 | DE |
3918736 | Dec 1990 | DE |
3918736 | Dec 1990 | DE |
0578998 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 797 988 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0578988 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0578998 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0797988 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0809998 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0809998 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0872220 | Oct 1998 | EP |
947204 | Oct 1999 | EP |
947204 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0947204 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 155 689 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1155689 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1362603 | Nov 2003 | EP |
9826731 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9826731 | Jun 1998 | WO |
0024338 | May 2000 | WO |
0024338 | May 2000 | WO |
0040159 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0040159 | Jul 2000 | WO |
03094798 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/081,494. |
Choquette et al. Direct Selenium X-Ray Detector for Fluoroscopy, R&F, and Radiography, 2000, In Medical Imaging 2000: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 3977, pp. 128-136. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/047,226 dated Apr. 13, 2011. |
Munshi I, Lathrop D, Madsen Jr, Frim DM; “Intraventricular Pressure Dynamics in Patients with Ventriculopleural Shunts: A Telemetric Study”; Pediatric Neurosurgery; 1998; vol. 28; pp. 67-69. |
Jose M. Montes, MD; John H. Wong, MD; Pierre B. Fayad, MD; Issam A. Awad, MD; Stereotactic Computed Tomographic-Guided Aspiration and Thrombolysis of Intracerebral Hematoma Stroke Apr. 2000; vol. 31: pp. 834-840. |
Neal J. Naff, MD; Juan R. Carhuapoma, MD; Michael A. Williams, MD; Anish Bhardwaj, MD; John A. Ulaowski, MD, PhD; Joshua Bederson, MD; Ross Bullok, MD; Eric Schmutzhard, MD; Bettina Pfausler, MD; Penelope M. Keyl, PhD; Stanley Tuhrim, MD; Daniel F. Hanley, MD; “Treatment of Intraventricular Hemorrhage With Urokinase Effects on 30-Day Survival”; Stroke, Apr. 2000; vol. 31 pp. 841-847. |
Miyake, Hiroji MD; Ohta, Tomio MD; Kajimoto, Yoshinaga MD; Matsukawa, Masanori MD; “A New Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt with a Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Sensor: Clinical Experience in 94 Patients with Hydrocephalus”; Neurosurgery. 40(5): 931-935, May 1997. |
Dr. Hans-Ulrich Laasch et al., “Revision Notes for the FRCR Part 1”, The Society of Radiologists in Training, 1999 (60 pages). |
A.C. Kak Malcolm Slaney, “Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging”, Chapter 4 (Measurement of Projection Data—The Nondiffracting Case), pp. 113-134, IEEE, 1988. |
Anthony R. Kovscek et al., “Stanford University Petroleum Research Institute Preliminary Twenty-Fourth Annual Report”, Apr. 19-21, 2001 (68 pages). |
Google's Cache of http://www.bicetre.neuroradio.net/french/journal/menu.htm. at http://www.google.com/search?q=cacheU20QRBv7hYC; www.bicetre.neuroradio.net/french/journal/menu.htm=MCTA+angiography&hi=en&ie+UTF8, Index MARS 2002 (5 pages). |
Gailloud P. Hillis, A., Perler, B.; and Murphy, K.J. “Vertebrobasilar Stroke as a Late Complication of a Blalock-Taussig Shunt”, Wiley-Liss, Inc., 2002, pp. 231-234. |
Google's Cache of http://www.google.ca/search ?q=%houndsfield+unit%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF8&hl=en&meta=, Mar. 21, 2003 (60 pages). |
Dolmach, Bart, MD., et al., “Patency and Tissue Response Related to Two Types of Polytetrafluroethylene-Covered Stens in the dog,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 7 No. 5 Sep.-Oct. 1996, pp. 642-649. |
Michael Strotzer, MD., et al. “Appearance of Vascular Stents in Computed Tomographic Angiography: In Vitro Examination of 14 Different Stent Types,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 36: (11) pp. 652-658, Nov. 2001. |
Stefan Hahnel, et al., “Small-Vessel Stents for Intracranial Angioplasty: In Vitro Comparison of Different Stent Designs and Sizes by Using CT Angiography,” AJNR AM J Neuroradiol 24:1512-1516, Sep. 2003. |
David Maintz et al., “Revealing in—Stent Stenoses of the Iliac Arteries: Comparison of Multidetector CT with MR Angiography and Digital Radiographic Angiography in a Phantom Model,” AJR:179, p. 1319-1322, Nov. 2002. |
Henry Brem, et al. “Polymer-Based Drug Delivery to the Brain,” Science & Medicine, Inc., vol. 3, No. 4, p. 1-11, Jul./Aug. 1996. |
Stephen Schroeder, et al. “Influence of Heart Rate on Vessel Visibility in Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using New Multislice Computed Tomography Experience in 94 Patients,” Journal of Clinical Imaging 26 (2002), pp. 106-107. |
Paul P. Wang et al., “Local Drug Delivery to the Brain,” Advanced Drug Delivery Review 54 (2002) pp. 987-1013. |
Antezanna DF, et al., “High-dose Ibuprofen for reduction of striatal infarets during middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats,” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=PubMed&list-uids+12691413&dopt=Abstract; last visited on Oct. 1, 2003 (2 pages). |
Patrik Gabikian, MD et al., “Stroke: Prevention of Experimental Cerebral Vasospasm by Intracranial Delivery of Nitric Oxide Donor From Controlled-Release Polymer,” http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/33/11/12681, last visited on Oct. 1, 2003 (11 pages). |
Travis S. Tierney, et al., “Prevention and Reversal of Experimental Posthemorrhagic Vasospasm by the Periadventitial Administration of Nitric Oxide From a Controlled-release Polymer,” http://www.neurosurgery-online/fulltext/4904/0945/NURO49040945-doc.html, vol. 49 No. 4, Oct. 2001 (11 pages). |
Rafael J. Tamargo, et al. “The Intracerebral Administration of Phenytoin Using Controlled-Release Polymers Reduces Experimental Seizures in Rats,” Epillepsy Research 48, p. 145-155 (2002). |
J. Golzarian, Imaging After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal Imaging 28, p. 236-243 (2003). |
Jens Rodenwaldt, Multislice Computed Tomography of the Coronary Arteries, Eur Radiol (2003) 13:748-757, Jan. 2003. |
Stefanie Weigel et al., “Thoracic Aortic Stent Graft: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and CT Angiography in the Follow-Up: Initial Results,” Eur Radiol (2003) 13: 1628-1634, Feb. 2003. |
Quoc-Anh Thai, BA et al., “Inhibition of Experimental Vasospasm in Rats with the Periadventital Administration of Ibprofen Using Controlled-Release Polymers,” published by American Heart Association, pp. 140-147 Jan. 1999. |
Langer R. Brem et al., “Biocompatibility of Polymeric Delivery System for Macromolecules,” http://www.ncbi,nlm.nlh.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMedlist-uids+2772427&dopt=Abstract, last visited on Oct. 3, 2003 (1 page). |
Seung-Jung Park, MD., et al., “A Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Prevention of Coronary Restenosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348:1537-1545 No. 16, Apr. 17, 2003. |
Allan W. Heldman, MD et al., Paclitaxel Stent Coating Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia at 4 weeks in Porcine Model of Coronary Restenosis, published by the American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 2289-2295, May 2001. |
Jonette Foy, Phd., “Drug-Eluting Stents: Pre-Clinical Standards & Recommended Studied.” FDA/SIR Device Forum Meeting, Nov. 2002. |
Drake et al. The Shunt Book, Copyright 1995 Blackwell Science in Massachusettes. |
Kopp A F, Ohnsesorge B, Flohr T, Georg C. Schroeder S. Kuttner A, Martensen, J. Claussen CD Cardiac multidetector-row CT; First Clinical Results of retrospectively ECG-gated spiral with optimized temporal and spatial resolution, Rofo Fortschr Geb Rotgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr May 2000 172(5) 429-35. |
Ohnessorge B, Flohr T. Becker C, Knex A, Knopp A F Fukada K Reiser M F Cardiac Imaging with rapid, retrospective ECG Synchronized multilevel spiral CT Radiologe, Feb. 200; 40 (2) 111-7. |
Achenbach S. Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J Bachmann K, Non-invasive Coronary Angiography with Electron Beam Tomography: Methods and Clinical Evaluation in Post-PTCA Follow-up Z Kardiol, Feb. 1997; 86(2) 121-30. |
Becker C R, Schoepf U J, Reiser M F., Methods for Quantification of Coronary Artery Calsifications with Electrogram Beam and Conventional CT and Pushing the Spiral CT Envelope; New Cardiac Applications, Int J. Cardiovasc Imaging Imaging, Jun. 17, 2001; (3): 203-11. |
Kopp A F, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Baumbach A Georg C, Kuzo R, Heuschmid M, Ohnesorge B, Karsch K R, Claussen C D, Non-invasive Coronary Angiography with High Resolution Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Results in 102 Patients, Eur Heart J., Nov. 23, 2002; (21); 1714-25. |
Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, Kachelriess M, Ropers D, Giesler T, Bautz W. Daniel W G, Kalender W A, Moshage W, Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT, Circulation, Dec. 5, 2000: 102(23):2823-8. |
Knez A, Becker A, Becker C, Leber A Boekstegers P, Reiser M, Steinbeck G., Detection of Coronary Calcinosis with Multislice Spiral Computerization Tomography: An Alternative to Electron Bean Tomography, Z. Kardiol, Aug. 2002:01 (8): 642-9. |
Mahnken A H, Sinha A M, Wildberger J E, Krombach G A , Schmitz-Rode T, Gunther R W , The Influence of Motion Artifacts Conditioned by Reconstruction, on the Coronary Clacium Score in Multislice Spiral CT, Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verahr, Oct. 2001; 173(10): 888-92. |
Moses et al., Sirlumus Eluting Stents Versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis of the Coronary Artery, New England Journal of Medicine, p. 1315-1323, Oct. 2, 2003 vol. 349. |
Fossa Medical Welcome to Fossa Medical.com @ URL <http://www.fossamedical.com/news.htm. from Sep. 9, 2005 (retrieved on Sep. 18, 2008). |
Stone Sweeper (r) Kidney Stone Removal Device: The Clear Path to Ureteral Patency—Insertion Instructions, at URL<http://www.fossamedical.com/pdfs/sweepersurgicaltechnique.pdf>, 2004 (retrived on Sep. 18, 2008). |
H. Brem, et al. Biocompatibility of Biodegradable controlled released polymer in the rabbit brain, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrz/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list—uids=2772427&dopt=Abstract, last visited on Oct. 3, 2003 (1 page). |
Lee, Y., et al, Synthesis of 188 Re-labelled long chain alkyl diaminedithiol for therapy of liver cancer, Nuclear Medicine Communications, Mar. 2002—vol. 23, Issue 3, pp. 237-242. |
Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2011 for Application No. 2,455,439. |
Jose M. Montes, MD; John H. Wong, MD; Pierre B. Fayad, MD Issam A. Awad, MD; “Stereotactic Computed Tomographic—Guided Aspiration and Thrombolysis of Intracerebral Hematonna” Stroke. Apr. 2000; vol. 31: pp. 834-840. |
Neal J. Naff, MD; Juan R. Carhuapoma, MD; Michael A. Williams, MD; Anish Bhardwaj, MD; John A. Ulatowski, MD, PhD; Joshua Bederson, MD; Ross Bullock, MD; Erich Schmutzhard, MD; Bettina Pfausler, MD; Penelope M. Keyl, PhD; Stanley Tuhrim, MD Daniel F. Hanley, MD ; “Treatment of Intraventricular Hemorrhage With Urokinase Effects on 30-Day Survival”; Stroke. Apr. 2000; vol. 31: pp. 841-847. |
Miyake, Hiroji MD; Ohta, Tomio MD; Kajimoto, Yoshinaga MD; Matsukawa, Masanori MD; “A New Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt with a Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Sensor: Clinical Experience in 94 Patients with Hydrocephalus”; Neurosurgery. 40(5):931-935, May 1997. |
Dr. Hans-Ulrich Laasch et ai', “Revision Notes for the FRCR Part 1”, The Society of Radiologists in Training, 1999 (60 pages). |
A.C. Kak and Malcolm Slaney, “Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging”, Chapter 4 (Measurement of Projection Data—The Nondiffracting Case), pp. 113-134, IEEE, 1988 (22 pages). |
Google's Cache of http://www.bicetre.neuroradio.net/frenchljournal/ menu .htm. at http://www.google.com/search?q=cacheU20QRBv7hYC; www.bicetre.neuroradio.net/ french/journal/menu.htm+MCTA+angiography&hl=en&ie+UTF8, Index MARS 2002 (5 pages). |
Gailoud, P.; Hillis, A.; Perler, B.; and Murphy, K.J. “Vertebrobasilar Stroke as a Late Complication of a Blalock-Taussig Shunt”, Wiley-Liss, Inc., 2002, pp. 231-234 (4 pages). |
Google's Cache of http://ww.google.ca/search?q=%houndsfield+unit% 22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF8&hl=en&meta=, Mar. 21, 2003 (60 pages). |
Dolmatch, Bart. M.D., et al., “Patency and Tissue Response Related to Two Types of Polytetrafluoroethylene-Covered Stents in the Dog,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. vol. 7, No. 5, Sep.-Oct. 1996, pp. 642-649 (9 pages). |
Michael Strotzer, MD, et al., “Appearance of Vascular Stents in Computed Tomographic Angiography: In Vitro Examination of 14 Different Stent Types,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 36: (11) p. 652-658, Nov. 2001, (6 pages). |
Stefan Hahnel, el al., “Small-Vessel Stents for Intracranial Angioplasty: In Vitro Comparison of Different Stent Designs and Sizes by Using CT Angiography,” AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1512-1516, Sep. 2003 (6 pages). |
David Maintz, et al., “Revealing In-Stent Stenoses of the Ilac Arteries: Comparison of Multidelector CT with MR Angiography and Digital Radiographic Angiography in a Phantom Model,” AJR:179, p. 1319-1322, Nov. 2002 (4 pages). |
Henry Brem, et al., “Polymer-Based Drug Delivery to the Brain,” Science & Medicine, Inc., vol. 3, No. 4, p. 1-11, Jul./Aug. 1996 (11 pages). |
Stephen Schroeder, et al., “Influence of Heart Rate on Vessel Visibilty in Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using New Multislice Computed Tomography Expenence in 94 Patients,” Journal of Clinical Imaging 26 (2002), p. 106-107, 2002 (2 pages). |
Paul P. Wang. et al., “Local Drug Delivery to the Brain,” Advanced Drug Delivery Review 54 (2002), p. 987-1013, (27 pages). |
Antezanna DF. et al., “High-dose Ibuprofen for reduction of striatal infarets during middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats,” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query .fcgi?cmd=PubMed&list—uids+12691413&dopt=Abstract; last visited on Oct. 1, 2003 (2 pages). |
Patrik Gabikian, MD. et al., “Stroke: Prevention of Experimental Cerebral Vasospasm by Intracranial Delivery of a Nitric Oxide Donor From a Controlled-Release Polymer,” http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/33/11/2681, last visited on 10101/2003 (11 pages). |
Travis S. Tiemey, et al., “Prevention and Reversal of Expenmental Posthemorrhagic Vasospasm by the Periadventital Administration of Nitric Oxide From a Controlled-release Polymer,” http:/www.neurosurgery-online/fulltext/4904/0945/NUR049040945—doc.html, vol. 49, No. 4. Oct. 2001 (11 pages). |
Rafael J. Tamargo, et al.. “The Intracerebral Administration of Phenytoin Using Controlled-Release Polymers Reduces Experimental Seizures in Rats,” Epilepsy Research 48, p. 145-155; 2002 (11 pages). |
J. Golzarian, “Imaging After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.” Abdominal Imaging 28, p. 236-243, 2003 (8 pages). |
Jens Rodenwaldt, “Multislice Computed Tomography of the Coronary Arteries,” Eur Radiol (2003) 13:748-757, Jan. 2003 (10 pages). |
Stefanie Weigel, et al.. “Thoracic Aortic Stent Graft: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and CT Angiopgraphy in the Follow-Up: Initial Results,” Eur Radiol (2003) 13:1628-1634, Feb. 2003 (7 pages). |
Quoc-Anh Thai, BA, et al., “Inhibition of Experimental Vasospasm in Rats with the Periadventital Administration of Ibuprofen Using Controlled-Release Polymers,” published by Amencan Heart Association, p. 140-147, Jan. 1999 (8 pages). |
Langer R. Brem, et al., “Biocompatibilty of Polymeric delivery systems for macromolecules,” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov;80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list—uids=7348718&dopt=Abstract, last visited on Oct. 31, 2003 (1 page). |
H. Brem, et al., “Biocompatibilty of a biodegradable, controlled-release polymer in the rabbit brain,” http://www.ncbi .nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query .fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list—uids=2772427&dopt=Abstract, last visited on Oct. 3, 2003 (1 page). |
Seung-Jung Park, M.D., et al., “A Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Prevention of Coronary Restenosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348:1537-1545, No. 16, Apr. 17, 2003, (3 pages). |
Allan W. Heldman, MD, et al., “Paclitaxel Stent Coating Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia at 4 weeks in a Porcine Model of Coronary Restenosis,” published by Amencan Heart Association, Inc., p. 2289-2295, May 2001 (7 pages). |
Jonette Foy, Ph.D., “Drug-Eluting Stents: Pre-Clinical Standards & Recommended Studies,” FDA/SIR Device Forum Meeting, Nov. 2002 (7 pages). |
Drake et al., The Shunt Book, Copyrgt. 1995 Blackwell Science Inc. Massachusetts. |
Kopp A F, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Georg C, Schroeder S, Kuttner A, Martensen,J, Claussen C D., Cardiac multidetector-row CT: first clinical results of retrospectively ECG-gated spiral with optimized temporal and spatial resolution, Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. May 2000; 172(5):429-35. |
Ohnessorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, Knex A, Kopp A F, Fukuda K. Reiser M F., Cardiac imaging with rapid, retrospective ECG synchronized multilevel spiral CT Radiologe, Feb. 2000:40(2): 111-7. |
Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K, Non-invasive coronary angiography with electron beam tomography: methods and clinical evaluation in post-PTCA follow-up Z Kardiol., Feb. 1997; 86(2):121-30. |
Becker C R, Schoepf U J, Reiser M F., Methods for quantification of coronary artery calcificatins with electron beam and conventional CT and pushing the spiral CT envelope: new cardiac applications. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, Jun. 17, 2001;(3):203-11. |
Kopp A F, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Baumbach A, Georg C, Kuzo R, Heuschmid M, Ohnesorge B, Karsch K R, Claussen C D, Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. Eur Heart J. Nov. 23, 2002;(21): 1714-25. |
Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S,Baum U, Kachelriess M. Ropers D, Giesler T. Bautz W, Daniel W G, Kalender W A, Moshage W, Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation. Dec. 5, 2000:102(23):2823-8. |
Knez A, Becker A, Becker C, Leber A, Boekstegers P, Reiser M, Steinbeck G,, Detection of coronary calcinosis with multislice spiral computerized tomography: an alternative to electron beam tomography Z Kardiol. Aug. 2002:91 (8):642-9. |
Mahnken A H, Sinha A M, Wildberger J E, Krombach G A, Schmitz-Rode T, Gunther R W, The influence of motion artifacts conditioned by reconstruction, on the coronary calcium score in multislice spiral CT, Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr, Oct. 2001;173(10):888-92. |
Moses et al., Sirilumus eluting stents versus stanrd stents in patients with stenosis of the coronary artery, New England Journal of Medicine, p. 1315-1323 Oct. 2, 2003 vol. 349, No. 14. |
John Summerscales, Non-destructive testing of fibre-reinforced plastics composites, vol. 2; Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 1990; p. 208. |
Choquette et al., Direct selenium x-ray detector for fluoroscopy, R&F, and radiography, 2000, In Medical Imaging 2000: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 3977, pp. 128-136. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jan. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/516,218. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Dec. 10, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,220. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130226210 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60366530 | Mar 2002 | US | |
60366529 | Mar 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11081494 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 13190830 | US | |
Parent | 10373835 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 11081494 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13190830 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 13858609 | US |