The subject invention relates generally to the field of spinal implants and more particularly to expandable interbody fusion devices with graft chambers.
Spinal implants such as interbody fusion devices are used to treat degenerative disc disease and other damages or defects in the spinal disc between adjacent vertebrae. The disc may be herniated or suffering from a variety of degenerative conditions, such that the anatomical function of the spinal disc is disrupted. Most prevalent surgical treatment for these conditions is to fuse the two vertebrae surrounding the affected disc. In most cases, the entire disc will be removed, except for a portion of the annulus, by way of a discectomy procedure. A spinal fusion device is then introduced into the intradiscal space and suitable bone graft or bone substitute material is placed substantially in and/or adjacent the device in order to promote fusion between two adjacent vertebrae.
Certain spinal devices for achieving fusion are also expandable so as to correct disc height between the adjacent vertebrae. Examples of expandable interbody fusion devices are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,595,998 entitled “Tissue Distraction Device”, which issued on Jul. 22, 2003 (the '998 patent), U.S. Pat. No. 7,931,688 entitled “Expandable Interbody Fusion Device”, which issued on Apr. 26, 2011 (the '688 patent), and U.S. Pat. No. 7,967,867 entitled “Expandable Interbody Fusion Device”, which issued on Jun. 28, 2011 (the '867 patent). The '998 patent, the '688 patent and the '867 patent each discloses sequentially introducing in situ a series of elongate inserts referred to as wafers in a percutaneous approach to incrementally distract opposing vertebral bodies to stabilize the spine and correct spinal height, the wafers including features that allow adjacent wafers to interlock in multiple degrees of freedom. The '998 patent, the '688 patent and the '867 patent are assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, the disclosures of these Patents being incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Certain interbody fusion devices also include hollow portions or chambers that are filled with suitable material such as bone graft to promote fusion between vertebral bodies. The extent and size of the chambers establish areas of contact that are configured so as to assure maximum contact between the bone graft and the vertebral bodies. Sufficient surface area of the device surrounding the chambers needs to be maintained in order to provide an appropriate load bearing surface to withstand the compressive forces exerted by the opposing vertebral bodies. In addition, where expandable interbody fusion devices are used to correct height within the intradiscal space, the effect of shear forces on the expanded device due to torsional movement of the spine also needs to be considered.
Accordingly, there is a need to develop expandable interbody fusion devices with bone graft chambers that take into account and balance these factors, as well as to facilitate the introduction of bone graft into the device and through the graft chambers once expanded.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved expandable device with openings serving as bone graft chambers for implantation into the intradiscal space between two opposing vertebral bodies of a spine having the facility for introducing bone graft thereinto upon expansion.
For the purposes of promoting and understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and described in the following written specification. It is understood that no limitation to the scope of the invention is thereby intended. It is further understood that the present invention includes any alterations and modifications to the illustrated embodiments and includes further applications of the principles of the invention as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, an expandable interbody fusion device 10 includes a first superior endplate 12 and a second inferior endplate 14, as shown in
The present invention contemplates an improved interbody fusion device 10 that particularly includes openings that define graft chambers for containment of materials that promote bone fusion through the device between opposing vertebral bodies.
The superior endplate 12 as shown in
As shown particularly in
The inferior endplate 14 of the interbody fusion device 10 as shown in
The inferior plate 14 as shown in
As shown particularly in
Where inferior endplate 14 is formed of titanium or other suitable metal that is radiopaque, windows 56 may be formed through sidewalls 36 and 38 and/or through front endwall 42 as shown in
Details of an interlocking wafer 100 are shown in
The rear end 106 includes a downward-facing sloped surface 120 at the free end of each arm 112 and 114 that corresponds angularly to an upward-facing surface 122 on the leading front end 108 of the wafer 100. The sloped surfaces help displace an earlier inserted wafer 100 upon introduction of a new wafer. More specifically, when a first wafer 100a is introduced through the wafer channel 46, resting on the ledges 48, the downward-facing sloped surface 120 thereof is lifted upon contact with the upward-facing slope 122 of a newly inserted wafer 100b (
The wafer 100 includes several features for interlocking engagement to the hub 16 and to adjacent wafers 100 in a complementary interlocking mating interface. One particular feature includes a series of locking elements defined by resiliently deflectable prongs 124 that project outwardly above the upper surface 102 of the wafer 100 in the direction of expansion of device 10. A complementary series of locking surfaces 126 are defined in the lower surface 104 of the wafer 100 for resilient engagement with the prongs 124 as wafers are inserted into device 10 to form a stack. It should be appreciated that the prongs 124 and associated locking surfaces 126 may be formed on either the upper surface or the lower surface of a wafer 100 as desired. The lower surface 104 of each wafer 100 as shown in
The superior and inferior endplates 12 and 14 are configured to be initially releasably engaged by the ribs (not shown) and the grooves 30 when the device 10 is unexpanded, as shown in
The inserter 200 as illustrated in
The manner in which the interbody fusion device 10 is expanded is illustrated in
Having described the interbody fusion device 10, a suitable bone filler or bone graft to promote fusion between opposing vertebral bodies may be inserted into the expanded device 10 as well as into the intradiscal space adjacent to device 10. With the inserter 200 used to insert inserts such as wafers 100 into device 10 having been removed from the expanded device 10, it can be appreciated that the wafer insertion channel 46 provides clear and unobstructed access into the expanded device 10 and into the rearward facing openings 116 of wafers 100, facilitating the introduction of bone graft material. A suitable graft insertion instrument using the guide pin 210 as a locator may be used to inject bone graft under pressure into the expanded device 10. Under an appropriate pressure, such bone graft will flow through into channel and openings 116 and into the openings 32 and 56 of superior endplate 12 and inferior endplate 14. Injection of the bone graft will continue until the graft is stress loaded against the endplates of the opposing vertebral bodies. In some instances, bone graft may be pre-loaded into an unexpanded device 10 prior to insertion of the device 10 into the intradiscal disc space. Suitable bone graft materials may include autograph bone, allograft bone, bone morphogenic protein (BMP) and xenograft and synthetic derived bone substitutes, as described for example, in the '998 patent. It should also be understood that a material with a bone fusion promoting substance, such as a sponge saturated with BMP, may be placed in the openings 32 and 54 suitably formed to support such a sponge. This will allow the fusion promoting substance to be pre-loaded into device 10 and not be disrupted upon expansion of device 10 by insertion of wafers 100 as described herein.
It is contemplated that the wafers 100 described herein, be formed of a biocompatible material that is sufficiently rigid to form a solid stack as the successive wafers are inserted into the device. Thus, in one specific embodiment, the wafers 100 are formed of PEEK or a carbon-fiber reinforced PEEK, or similar polymeric material.
In accordance with certain specific applications, the overall length of the device 10 as shown in
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same should be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character. It is understood that only the preferred embodiments have been presented and that all changes, modifications and further applications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected. For instance, as shown in
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/795,054, filed Mar. 12, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,900,312, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3486505 | Morrison | Dec 1969 | A |
4524766 | Petersen | Jun 1985 | A |
4683476 | Ferrari et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4736738 | Lipovsek et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4743493 | Sioshansi et al. | May 1988 | A |
4755797 | Kanaya | Jul 1988 | A |
4863476 | Shepperd | Sep 1989 | A |
4888024 | Powlan | Dec 1989 | A |
5059193 | Kuslich | Oct 1991 | A |
5192326 | Bao et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
5197971 | Bonutti | Mar 1993 | A |
5298254 | Prewett et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5431658 | Moskovich | Jul 1995 | A |
5439684 | Prewett et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5505732 | Michelson | Apr 1996 | A |
5514180 | Heggeness et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522899 | Michelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5571109 | Bertagnoli | Nov 1996 | A |
5591235 | Kuslich | Jan 1997 | A |
5645599 | Samani | Jul 1997 | A |
5702454 | Baumgartner | Dec 1997 | A |
5755797 | Baumgartner | May 1998 | A |
5756127 | Grisoni et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766252 | Henry et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5836948 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860977 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5891147 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5951553 | Betz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980522 | Koros et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6033411 | Preissman | Mar 2000 | A |
6045579 | Hochshuler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6066154 | Reiley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074390 | Zucherman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110179 | Flivik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110210 | Norton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6159211 | Boriani et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159244 | Suddaby | Dec 2000 | A |
6190414 | Young et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200347 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241771 | Gresser et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273916 | Murphy | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279916 | Stecher | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287308 | Betz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287309 | Baccelli et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290724 | Marino | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6387130 | Stone et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395034 | Suddaby | May 2002 | B1 |
6402750 | Atkinson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419705 | Erickson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432107 | Ferree | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436142 | Paes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478800 | Fraser et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488710 | Besselink | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500205 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6520993 | James et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6562074 | Gerbec | May 2003 | B2 |
6595998 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6620196 | Trieu | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6648917 | Gerbec et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656178 | Veldhuizen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6726691 | Osorio et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740093 | Hochschuler et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6837904 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852095 | Ray | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6852126 | Ahlgren | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852129 | Gerbec et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863673 | Gerbec et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6997929 | Manzi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7094257 | Mujwid et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118580 | Beyersdorff et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7591852 | Prosser | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7918891 | Curran et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7931688 | Landry et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7967867 | Barreiro et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8062375 | Glerum et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8303663 | Jimenez et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8303879 | Bertele et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8308805 | Lynn et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8337562 | Landry et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8382842 | Greenhalgh et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8491658 | Etminan | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8628578 | Miller et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8795369 | Pimenta | Aug 2014 | B1 |
20020026195 | Layne et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020147497 | Belef et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177897 | Michelson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183761 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030171812 | Grunberg et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040019354 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040064144 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040162618 | Mujwid et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040220580 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230198 | Manzi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050027364 | Kim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050149194 | Ahlgren | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050283244 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060058807 | Landry et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058880 | Wysocki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060129244 | Ensign | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080154377 | Voellmicke | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161927 | Savage et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172127 | Perez-Cruet et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080300598 | Barreiro et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090138086 | Dewey | May 2009 | A1 |
20090198339 | Kleiner et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100179594 | Theofilos et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100292796 | Greenhalgh et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312347 | Arramon et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120022653 | Kirschman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120158144 | Ullrich, Jr. et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191190 | Trieu | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120253406 | Bae et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130090735 | Mermuys et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140148903 | Pinto | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0621020 | Oct 1994 | EP |
2639823 | Jun 1990 | FR |
2719763 | Nov 1995 | FR |
2004525692 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2006517836 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2011513001 | Apr 2011 | JP |
9902214 | Jan 1999 | WO |
02071921 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2009114381 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Search Report for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/064534. |
Baddeley, S. and Cullen, J.C., “The Use of Methylmethacrylate in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumours of the Proximal Tibia”, Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. vol. 49—No. 1, Feb. 1979, 3 pp. |
Campanacci, M., Gui, L, Ranieri, L., Savini, R., “Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures”, Chi. Org. Mov. 72(3), Dec. 1975 (Italian text), pp. 234-256, English Translation, 15 pp. |
Kyphon Inc., Surgical Technique Manual Nov. 16, 1999, pp. 5, 6, 9, 16-19. |
Kyphon web page, www.kyphon.com, Mar. 13, 2001, 1 p. |
Signus Medical, TETRIS, Sep. 2003, 1 p. |
Blackstone Medical Inc., Construx™ PEEK VBR System, 2005, www.blackstonemedical.com, 1 p. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150088260 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13795054 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14550208 | US |