This invention relates to an apparatus in a drill string. Specifically, this invention is a spirally welded metal tube having its original diameter sufficiently reduced by the formation of non-uniform protrusions on its surface so that it may be inserted into the bore of an internally upset drill pipe. The spirally welded metal tube is disposed within the drill pipe, and then expanded to conform to the inside surface of the pipe. The protrusions allow the tube to be expanded to at least its original diameter without rupturing the wall of the tube.
The idea of putting a metal tube as a liner into a drill pipe for the purpose of improving the corrosion resistance of the drill pipe and for providing a passageway for electrical conductors and fluid flow is not new. Those who are skilled in the art are directed to the following disclosures as references for installing a metal tube in a drill pipe.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,379,800, to Hare, incorporated herein by this reference, disclosed the use of a protective shield for conductors and coils running along the length of the drill pipe. The shield served to protect the conductors from abrasion that would be caused by the drilling fluid and other materials passing through the bore of the drill pipe.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,633,414, to Boivinet, incorporated herein by this reference, disclosed a liner for an autoclave having folds that allowed the liner to be installed into the autoclave. Once the liner was installed, it was expanded against the inside wall of the autoclave using hydraulic pressure.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,311,661, to Zifferer, incorporated herein by this reference, teaches a method for forming corrugations in the wall of a copper tube. The corrugations are formed by drawing or pushing the tube through a system of dies to reduce the diameter of the end portions and form the corrugations in center portion. Although the disclosure does not anticipate the use of a corrugated liner in drill pipe or other downhole component, the method of forming the corrugations is readily adaptable for that purpose.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,517,843, to Winship, incorporated herein by this reference, discloses a method of making an upset end on metal pipe. The method of the reference teaches that as the end of the metal tube is forged, i.e. upset, the wall thickness of the end of the pipe increases and inside diameter of the pipe is reduced. The upsetting process, therefore, results in an overall changing topography along the inside wall of the drill pipe.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,865,127; and 6,354,373 and Publication Number 2003/0178197 disclose lining a production well or a well bore. U.S. Pat. No. 5,390,742 to Dines, et al. discloses a patch for a longitudinally spaced series of tubular nipple structures installed in a well flow conductor operatively extending through a subterranean well bore. The walls of drill pipe and of production nipples require different characteristics. A drill pipe must be sufficiently strong to withstand the rotary motion and drilling strains experienced by a drill string, while the nipple comprises thinned walls such that a perforating gun may more easily rupture the wall.
U.S. application Ser. No. 10/707,232 filed by the applicants of the present invention on Nov. 29, 2003 discloses a liner insertable into the central bore of a downhole tool which includes a resilient material rolled into a substantially cylindrical shape. The outside diameter of the liner is variable to allow the liner to be inserted into a narrowed bore of the downhole tool near the box end or pin end. Once past the narrowed bore, the outside diameter of the liner self-expands within the central bore of the downhole tool.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,029,932 discloses an apparatus for lining the interior of a metal pipe with a resilient material. A resilient material ribbon is fed from a roll external to the pipe and is drawn into the pipe by a first trolley which moves inside the pipe from one end of the pipe to the other. The first trolley shapes the ribbon into a spiral with overlapping edges. A laser beam is directed along the pipe and is redirected by a second trolley, which moves in synchronism with the first, towards the region at which the ribbon is being laid down against the pipe, the laser beam serving to weld overlapping edge regions of ribbon to each other. Special weld patterns are disclosed for preventing the leaks through the lining even in the presence of anticipated weld flaws.
An apparatus in a drill string comprises an internally upset drill pipe. The drill pipe comprises a first end, a second end, and an elongate tube intermediate the first and second ends. The elongate tube and the ends comprising a continuous inside surface with a plurality of diameters. A conformable spirally welded metal tube is disposed within the drill pipe intermediate the ends thereof and terminating adjacent to the ends of the drill pipe. The conformable metal tube substantially conforms to the continuous inside surface of the metal tube.
The metal tube may be made of a material selected from the group consisting of steel, stainless steel, titanium, aluminum, copper, nickel, chrome, molybdenum, compounds, mixtures, and alloys thereof. The apparatus may comprise a metal tube which is more corrosion resistant than the drill pipe. The corrosion resistance may extend the utility of the drill pipe. Fluids traveling within the bore of the drill pipes may create a solution allowing electrons to pass between the metal tube and drill pipe. An electrically insulating material between the metal tube and the drill pipe may resist this galvanic corrosion between the metal tube and the drill pipe; thereby, preserving the apparatus.
The metal tube may comprise a non-uniform section which is expanded to conform to the inside surface of the drill pipe. The non-uniform section may comprise protrusions selected from the group consisting of convolutions, corrugations, flutes, and dimples. The non-uniform section extends generally longitudinally along the length of the metal tube. The spirally welded metal tube may be adapted to stretch as the drill pipes stretch. The metal tube may have a regular end portion that is free of the non-uniform section. The non-uniform section of the metal tube may extend spirally along the surface of the metal tube. The non-uniform section may also be intermediate the end portions of the tube.
The non-uniform section of the metal tube may be formed by using hydraulic pressure, by roll forming, or by stamping. More than one die may be used to form the non-uniform section of the metal tube. A rough outside surface of the metal tube may help in bonding the metal tube to the inside surface of the drill pipe. The metal tube may be expanded inside the drill pipe by using hydraulic pressure or by drawing a mandrel over the uniform section. The metal tube may be placed in the drill pipe before the drill pipe is added to the drill string. Preferably, the non-uniform section of the metal tube is expanded and compressed against the inside surface of the drill pipe.
The inside surface may comprise a transition region comprising a plurality of diameters and forming a convex region and a concave region in the inside surface of the drill pipe. It is believed, but not wanting to be bound by any theory, that the spiral weld of the liner increases the strength of the liner as it expands to conform against the concave region of the transition region. It is further believed that the force expanding the liner is felt by the spiral weld at an angle, which distributes the force over a portion length of the weld.
It is believed, but not wanting to be bound by any theory, that the spiral weld 60 of the metal tube 36 increases the strength of the liner as it expands to conform against the concave region of the transition region. The force expanding the liner may be felt by the spiral weld 60 at an angle distributing the force over a greater portion of the weld 60. A spirally welded metal tube may be 0.04″ thick and be purchased from Packless Metal Hose, Inc. located in Waco, Tex. Alternatively, the liner may range from 0.02″ to 0.12″ thick for a metal tube with an upset, 5-⅞″ double shouldered drill pipe obtainable from Grant Prideco, Houston, Tex.
In the process of forming the end portions 51 and corrugations, the outside diameter of the metal tube 36 is decreased so that it may be inserted into a drill pipe 34, where the first diameter 39 of the drill pipe 34 is smaller than the outside diameter 57 of the metal tube 36. Once the metal tube 36 is inside the drill pipe 34, the metal tube 36 is plugged and hydraulically or mechanically expanded to its desired diameter. The protrusions 47 in the tube 36 allow the metal tube 36 to expand to at least its original outside diameter 57 and beyond, if so desired, without over straining the material of the metal tube 36. In this fashion the metal tube 36 may accommodate the changing inside surface 40 of the drill pipe 34. Another method of expanding the tube 36 is depicted in U.S. Pat. No. 2,263,714, incorporated herein by this reference, which discloses a method of drawing a mandrel through a metal tube 36 in order to expand it against the inside surface 40 of a drill pipe 34. Although the reference does not anticipate a first and a second diameter 37, 39, the mandrel may be adapted, according to the present invention, to size the tube 36 to the desired configuration within the drill pipe 34.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/710,936 filed on Aug. 13, 2004, which is herein incorporated by reference. U.S. application Ser. No. 10/710,936 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/212,187 filed on Aug. 5, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,799,632 which is herein incorporated by reference.
This invention was made with government support under Contract No. DE-FC26-01NT41229 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
749633 | Seeley | Jan 1904 | A |
2178931 | Crites et al. | Nov 1939 | A |
2301783 | Lee | Nov 1942 | A |
2354887 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1944 | A |
2379800 | Hare | Jul 1945 | A |
2414719 | Cloud | Jan 1947 | A |
2633414 | Boivinet | Mar 1953 | A |
2659773 | Barney | Nov 1953 | A |
2662123 | Koenig, Jr. | Dec 1953 | A |
2974303 | Dixon | Mar 1961 | A |
2982360 | Morton et al. | May 1961 | A |
3079549 | Martin | Feb 1963 | A |
3090031 | Lord | May 1963 | A |
3186222 | Martin | Jun 1965 | A |
3194886 | Mason | Jul 1965 | A |
3209323 | Grossman, Jr. | Sep 1965 | A |
3227973 | Gray | Jan 1966 | A |
3518608 | Papadopoulos | Jun 1970 | A |
3696332 | Dickson, Jr. et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3793632 | Still | Feb 1974 | A |
3807502 | Heilhecker et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3879097 | Oertle | Apr 1975 | A |
3930220 | Shawhan | Dec 1975 | A |
3957118 | Barry et al. | May 1976 | A |
3989330 | Cullen et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4012092 | Godbey | Mar 1977 | A |
4087781 | Grossi et al. | May 1978 | A |
4095865 | Denison et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4121193 | Denison | Oct 1978 | A |
4126848 | Denison | Nov 1978 | A |
4215426 | Klatt | Jul 1980 | A |
4220381 | Van der Graaf | Sep 1980 | A |
4348672 | Givler | Sep 1982 | A |
4445734 | Cunningham | May 1984 | A |
4537457 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4578675 | Macleod | Mar 1986 | A |
4605268 | Meador | Aug 1986 | A |
4660910 | Sharp et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4683944 | Curlett | Aug 1987 | A |
4698631 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4722402 | Weldon | Feb 1988 | A |
4785247 | Meador et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4788544 | Howard | Nov 1988 | A |
4806928 | Veneruso | Feb 1989 | A |
4884071 | Howard | Nov 1989 | A |
4901069 | Veneruso | Feb 1990 | A |
4914433 | Galle | Apr 1990 | A |
4924949 | Curlett | May 1990 | A |
5008664 | More et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5052941 | Hernandez-Marti et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5148408 | Matthews | Sep 1992 | A |
5248857 | Ollivier | Sep 1993 | A |
5278550 | Rhein-Knudsen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5302138 | Shields | Apr 1994 | A |
5311661 | Zifferer | May 1994 | A |
5332049 | Tew | Jul 1994 | A |
5334801 | Mohn | Aug 1994 | A |
5371496 | Tanamachi | Dec 1994 | A |
5454605 | Mott | Oct 1995 | A |
5455573 | Delatorre | Oct 1995 | A |
5505502 | Smith et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517843 | Winship | May 1996 | A |
5521592 | Veneruso | May 1996 | A |
5568448 | Tanigushi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5650983 | Kondo et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5691712 | Meek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5743301 | Winship | Apr 1998 | A |
RE35790 | Pustanyk et al. | May 1998 | E |
5810401 | Mosing et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5833490 | Bouldin | Nov 1998 | A |
5853199 | Wilson | Dec 1998 | A |
5856710 | Baughman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5898408 | Du | Apr 1999 | A |
5908212 | Smith et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924499 | Birchak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942990 | Smith et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955966 | Jeffryes et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959547 | Tubel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971072 | Huber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6030004 | Schock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041872 | Holcomb | Mar 2000 | A |
6045165 | Sugino et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6046685 | Tubel | Apr 2000 | A |
6057784 | Schaaf et al. | May 2000 | A |
6104707 | Abraham | Aug 2000 | A |
6108268 | Moss | Aug 2000 | A |
6123561 | Turner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141763 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6173334 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177882 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188223 | van Steenwyk et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196335 | Rodney | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223826 | Chau et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6367565 | Hall | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392317 | Hall et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
20020135179 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020193004 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030070842 | Bailey et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040039466 | Lilly et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0399987 | Nov 1990 | EP |
WO8801096 | Feb 1988 | WO |
WO9014497 | Nov 1990 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050082092 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10710936 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 10711454 | US | |
Parent | 10212187 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 10710936 | US |