The present disclosure relates to mapping electrical properties of tissues, and more specifically to an apparatus, method, and computer-accessible medium for a noninvasive mapping of electrical properties of materials using multiple radio frequency (“RF”) measurements.
The prospect of noninvasive mapping of electrical properties of tissues and materials has long been contemplated by scientists. A robust determination of a spatial distribution of electrical conductivity and permittivity can facilitate a wide range of applications in a similarly wide range of fields, from clinical diagnostics to materials science.
Modern imaging modalities have provided a wealth of information about the structure and function of body tissues, both in health and in disease. However, despite the broad array of contrast mechanisms available and the abundance of scientific and diagnostic imaging applications, the underlying electrical properties of tissues in their intact in vivo state have remained largely invisible. Magnetoencephalography or electrocardiography techniques can track an intrinsic electrical activity in the brain or the heart, albeit at coarse spatial resolution. Nonetheless, tissues can be electromagnetic entities, with varying abilities to carry currents and store charges. The ability of heterogeneous tissues to respond to externally applied electromagnetic fields can dictate the success of therapeutic interventions such as transcranial magnetic stimulation or radiofrequency ablation; interactions of electromagnetic fields with the body can distort images obtained with high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, limiting the practical use of these powerful devices; and invasive measurements have demonstrated that the electrical properties of tumors, for example, can differ dramatically from those of healthy tissue. Indeed, in the field of biomedical imaging, noninvasive electrical property mapping would provide a new tool for the detection and characterization of tumors, while at the same time, a detailed knowledge of electrical properties in vivo would enable both correction of distortions and accurate monitoring and control of patient-specific local energy deposition in high-field MRI. The concept of a “comprehensive electromagnetic superscanner” combining MRI and electrical property mapping has recently been described.
A variety of techniques for the electrical property imaging (or, equivalently, impedance imaging) have been previously described, but each such prior technique has its own notable limitations which have so far prevented widespread use. These techniques may be classified according to two complementary criteria: a) use of injected currents versus applied fields, and b) reliance upon surface measurements versus interior data. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) represents the canonical surface-based technique using injected currents. Alternative surface-based techniques which avoid direct application of currents include Magnetic Induction Tomography (MIT), noise tomography, and Radiofrequency Impedance Mapping (RFIM). All such electrical prospection techniques require the solution of ill-posed inverse problems, which carry with them fundamental challenges of robustness, spatial resolution, etc. Once it was recognized that MRI may be used as a probe of the internal distribution of currents and magnetic fields, however, new techniques for impedance mapping began to emerge, including the injected-current-based MREIT approach, and the field-based electrical property tomography (EPT) technique. These techniques can circumvent the fundamental limitations of surface-based inverse problems, but they contend with the fact that MRI generally provides only partial information about interior currents and fields.
Thus, there remains a need for noninvasive mapping apparatus, systems and computer-accessible medium of the electrical properties of materials that can expand the capabilities of nondestructive testing. Such apparatus, systems and computer-accessible mediums can have potential applications in manufacturing, geology, archaeology, forensics, diagnostics, etc.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, an assembly for determining at least one electrical property of an object can be provided. The exemplary apparatus can include at least one transmitter configured to generate a plurality of electromagnetic field distribution patterns directed at an object; and a magnetic resonance imaging (“MRI”) apparatus configured to produce at least one image of the object using at least one of a magnitude or a phase modulated by the electromagnetic field distribution patterns. Further, the assembly can be configured to process data associated with the object to determine the at least one electrical property of the object.
The transmitter of the exemplary assembly can include at least one radio frequency (“RF”) coil. Further, the RF coil can include: (1) a plurality of RF coils disposed at a plurality of locations; or (2) an RF coil sequentially disposed at a plurality of locations. The RF coil can include at least one RF transmit coil and at least one RF receive coil.
Additionally, the transmitter can include at least one of: (1) a plurality of RF current-inducing leads disposed at a plurality of locations; or (2) an RF current-inducing lead sequentially disposed at a plurality of locations. Transmitter of the exemplary assembly can also include a passive field-altering object sequentially placed at a plurality of locations.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a method of mapping at least one electrical property of an object can be provided. The exemplary method can include generating a plurality of electromagnetic field patterns; generating a plurality of MR images with at least one of a magnitude or a phase associated with the generated electromagnetic field patterns; generating a plurality of relationships relating the MR images to the electromagnetic field patterns, and to the at least one electrical property the object; and resolving the relationships for the at least one electrical property.
According to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure a non-transitory computer readable medium including instructions thereon that are accessible by a hardware processing arrangement can be provided. When the processing arrangement executes the instructions, the processing arrangement is configured to generate a plurality of electromagnetic field patterns; generate a plurality of MR images with at least one of a magnitude or a phase associated with the generated electromagnetic field patterns; generate a plurality of relationships relating the MR images to the electromagnetic field patterns, and to the at least one electrical property the object; and resolve the relationships for the at least one electrical property.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description of the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, when taken in conjunction with the appended claim.
Exemplary objects, features and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying Figures showing illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure, in which:
Throughout the drawings, the same reference numerals and characters, unless otherwise stated, are used to denote like features, elements, components, or portions of the illustrated embodiments. Moreover, while the present disclosure will now be described in detail with reference to the figures, it is done so in connection with the illustrative embodiments and is not limited by the particular embodiments illustrated in the figures or the claims appended herewith.
Spatial variations of radio-frequency (“RF”) fields can carry information about the spatial distributions of electrical properties (e.g., conductivity and permittivity) within an imaged object. To extract such information with non-invasive MR means, Maxwell equations can be transformed to arrive at a subset of equations relating RF transmit field and RF receive field to electrical properties:
ξ(x)B1+(x)=∇2B1+(x)+higher order terms (1)
and
ξ(x)*B1+(x)=∇2B1−(x)+higher order terms (2)
In Eqns. 1 and 2 x can be the spatial coordinate vector, * can denote complex conjugate, B1+ and B1− can be phasor representations of, respectively, the time-harmonic radio-frequency transmit and receive fields, and ξ(x) can represent (σ(x)+√{square root over (−1)}ωε(x))√{square root over (−1)}ωμ(x), a composite quantity that can be composed of angular frequency (ω) as well as such electrical properties as conductivity (σ), permittivity (ε) and permeability (μ). The higher order terms can involve spatial derivatives of electrical properties, and tend to vanish when the properties vary slowly in space. Typically, the higher the frequency at which an MR experiment is conducted, the stronger the impact the electrical property distributions tend to exert on the spatial variations of RF fields.
Unlike some alternative approaches to electrical property mapping, the derivation leading to Eqns. 1 and 2 typically does not rely on assumptions beyond Maxwell equations. Further, when the higher order terms are negligible, the two equations can involve RF transmit and receive field quantities. Because of relatively robust MR-based techniques that map RF transmit field using spin flip angles, non-invasive mapping of RF transmit field quantities can be more manageable than that of other electromagnetic field quantities. Eqn. 1 or Eqn. 2 can point to a more accurate/practical method for electrical property mapping. The Laplace's differential operator can be local and the higher order terms can be negligible in regions of slowly varying electrical property. This can give rise to local calculation of electrical properties:
ξ(x)=∇2B1+(x)/B1+(x) (3)
or
ξ(x)=complex conjugate(∇2B1−(x)/B1−(x)) (4)
In an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, where a map of B1+ field with a sufficiently fine spatial resolution is available, for any voxel non-adjacent to a boundary between materials of substantially different properties, a discretized approximation of the Laplacian can be used as follows and can give electrical properties:
In Eqn. 5, the subscripts can be voxel indices, the b's can denote phasor representations of true B1+ values, and the bracketed expression can be an example finite difference approximation (e.g., using a local region of size 2d×2d×2d) to applying Laplace's differential operator on B1+.
However, the true phase distribution of B1+ can be evasive and can be an obstacle for applying Eqn. 5-based property mapping in practice. In general, a B1+ map acquired by an existing MR-based B1+ mapping schemes can have its phase corrupted by an unknown phase distribution. In other words, the acquired B1+ map can be an unknown phase offset away from the true B1+:
B
1
+(x)={circumflex over (B)}1+(x)ejφ(x) (8)
where {circumflex over (B)}1+(x) can represent the acquired B1+ map and −φ(x) can equal the unknown phase distribution.
Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure can include a technique and/or a procedure that can employ multiple (albeit corrupted) measurements of RF transmit/receive fields to constrain and resolve the electrical property distributions. In an exemplary embodiment, parallel RF transmitters/receivers can be used to obtain the measurements. For a parallel transmit system, each of a plurality of true B1+ maps preferably satisfies Eqn 1. Further, in an exemplary implementation of the present disclosure employing a single coil for receive, a common unknown phase distribution (due to, e.g., the receive coil sensitivity's phase distribution and/or B0 inhomogeneity) can be shared amongst the acquired B1+ maps when they are compared to the corresponding true B1+ maps. The N independent B1+ maps associated with an N-channel transmit MRI of a subject then can impose a key set of consistency constraints on ξ(x):
ξ(x)({circumflex over (B)}1+(n)(x)ejφ(x))=∇2({circumflex over (B)}1+(n)(x)ejφ(x))+higher order terms, for n=1, . . . , N (9)
where −φ(x) can equal the common unknown phase distribution.
Eqn. 9 indicates that the use of a parallel transmit system and the employment of a common phase correction can lead to a buildup of constraints. To which degree the constraints resolve the value of can be better appreciated from a discretized version of Eqn 9:
ξp,q,r=[({circumflex over (b)}p+1,q,r(n)z1+{circumflex over (b)}p−1,q,r(n)z2+{circumflex over (b)}p,q+1,r(n)z3+{circumflex over (b)}p,q−1,r(n)z4+{circumflex over (b)}p,q,r+1z5+{circumflex over (b)}p,q,r−1z6−6{circumflex over (b)}p,q,r(n))/d2]/{circumflex over (b)}p,q,r(n) (10)
where the {circumflex over (b)}'s can denote phasor representations of B1+ values acquired by MR and the z's can be ratios of unknown phase terms (e.g., z1=exp(j*(φp+1,q,r−φp,q,r), . . . ). For each voxel, Eqn 10 can represent a set of N equations in 7 unknowns (ξ and the z's), and each of the z's can be additionally constrained to be of unit modulus. This formulation can resemble a hyperplane fitting problem, and a singular value decomposition can offer a solution for |ξp,q,r+6/d2|. An exemplary result obtained by employing an embodiment of the present disclosure in an FDTD simulation can be shown, for example, in
Because ξ(x) can represent (σ(x)+√{square root over (−1)}ωε(x))√{square root over (−1)}ωμ(x), a map of |ξp,q,r+6/d2| can capture conductivity and permittivity variations within the scanned object. This can provide noninvasive detection/characterization of pathology of the scanned object.
The concept of pooling equations that can constrain and resolve electrical property distributions can be integrated with other data acquisition schemes. In a further exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, an expanded hardware setup where M parallel receive coils as well as N parallel transmit coils are available for use in MR scans can be used. In this embodiment, a single transmit coil (which can be one of the N transmit coils or one that is synthesized by combining several of the N transmit coils) and the M receive coils can be utilized to additionally acquire M number of MR images (e.g., one from each of the receive coil) that can differ in individual receive coil sensitivity profiles (B1−(m)): Ŝ(m)(x)=S0(x)B1−(m)(x), or,
where Ŝ(m) can denote the MR images. Eqn. 11 indicates that the acquired MR images Ŝ(m) can be a common complex-valued scaling factor away from the true B1−(m).
Using a complex conjugate version of Eqn. 1, and following a similar derivation that led to Eqn. 9, it can be shown that
ξ(x)(conjugate(Ŝ(m)(x))w(x))=∇2(conjugate(Ŝ(m)(x))w(x))+higher order terms, for m=1, . . . , M (12)
where w(x) can denote conjugate(1/S0(x)). A discretized version of Eqn. 12 can be:
ξp,q,r=[(ŝp+1,q,r(m)y1+ŝp−1,q,r(m)y2+ŝp,q+1,r(m)y3+ŝp,q−1,r(m)y4+ŝp,q,r+1(m)y5+ŝp,q,r−1y6−6ŝp,q,r(m))/d2]/ŝp,q,r(m) (13)
where the ŝ's can denote complex conjugate of MR image values and the y's can be ratios of unknown scaling terms (e.g., y1=wp+1,q,r/wp,q,r, . . . ). For each voxel, Eqn. 13 can represent a set of M equations in 7 unknowns (e.g., ξ and the y's). The constraints represented by Eqn. 13 can augment those represented by Eqn. 10, allowing further determination of both the real and imaginary components of ξp,q,r and, subsequently, the conductivity and permittivity maps (see Eqns. 6 and 7). Eqn. 10 is capable of determining |ξp,q,r+6/d2|, which can address a limitation associated with Eqn. 13's lack of magnitude constraints on the y's when used alone. However, Eqn. 10 by itself typically cannot resolve the phase of ξp,q,r+6/d2. This limitation can be addressed with the incorporation of Eqn. 13.
Additionally, alternative exemplary hardware configuration and/or MR acquisitions schemes can be used to obtain multiple measurements of RF transmit/receive fields. Exemplary setups can include a plurality of RF current-inducing leads which can be positioned at a set of locations, an RF coil or RF current-inducing lead which can be sequentially placed at set of locations, and a passive, field-altering object which can be sequentially placed at a set of locations.
As shown in
Further, the exemplary processing arrangement 102 can be provided with or include an input/output arrangement 114, which can include, e.g., a wired network, a wireless network, the internet, an intranet, a data collection probe, a sensor, etc. As shown in
The foregoing merely illustrates the principles of the disclosure. Various modifications and alterations to the described embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the teachings herein. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise numerous systems, arrangements, and procedures which, although not explicitly shown or described herein, embody the principles of the disclosure and can be thus within the spirit and scope of the disclosure. In addition, all publications and references referred to above can be incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. It should be understood that the exemplary procedures described herein can be stored on any computer accessible medium, including a hard drive, RAM, ROM, removable disks, CD-ROM, memory sticks, etc., and executed by a processing arrangement and/or computing arrangement which can be and/or include a hardware processors, microprocessor, mini, macro, mainframe, etc., including a plurality and/or combination thereof. In addition, certain terms used in the present disclosure, including the specification, drawings and claims thereof, can be used synonymously in certain instances, including, but not limited to, e.g., data and information. It should be understood that, while these words, and/or other words that can be synonymous to one another, can be used synonymously herein, that there can be instances when such words can be intended to not be used synonymously. Further, to the extent that the prior art knowledge has not been explicitly incorporated by reference herein above, it can be explicitly being incorporated herein in its entirety.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/420,684, filed on Dec. 7, 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61420684 | Dec 2010 | US |