A. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to switch control of power to light sources, particularly high power consumption light sources, such that the power level to a light source may be increased or decreased as desired. Improved methods of switch control may be applicable to a variety of components within an electrical system, and may be combined with combinational capacitance to comprise a flexible method of power control to a light source. Power to a light source may be adjusted such that the amount of energy consumed and the quantity of light output may be adjusted, compensation may be made for lumen depreciation and other losses that occur during operational life of the light source, constant or near-constant light output may be maintained, or otherwise.
B. Problems in the Art
Electrical systems operating light sources may benefit from power control for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, energy conservation and the preservation of the quantity of light output.
High power light sources, such as those used in sports lighting applications, may readily consume considerable amounts of energy per hour; this is due in part to the plurality of light sources typically utilized in a given application. Therefore, improvements over the current state of the art in terms of energy conservation may produce significant benefits. One method of addressing energy conservation is to operate a light source at reduced power levels during off-peak operating conditions (e.g. for a typical sports lighting application, operating at a high power setting during tournament play versus operating at a low power setting during practice). Electrical systems with preset high/low power settings are well known in the art; methods of addressing energy conservation by operating at reduced power levels for said electrical systems may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,994,718 and commercially available from Musco Lighting, LLC, Oskaloosa, Iowa, USA under the trade name MULTI-WATT™.
Preservation of the quantity of light output is a concern for many light sources, particularly those which may experience lamp lumen depreciation (LLD), a condition in which the amount of light the source produces diminishes over its operating lifespan. One example of a light source that experiences LLD is a high intensity discharge (HID) lamp (e.g. model MH 1500W/HBU from Venture Lighting International, Solon, Ohio, U.S.A.); this type of lamp is typically used in wide area lighting applications such as sports lighting.
One method of addressing the diminishing quantity of light output due to LLD or otherwise is to incrementally increase power to the electrical system via capacitance increases over the course of the operating life of the light source. Assume, for example, a metal halide HID lamp operating at 1500 rated operating wattage (ROW) with typical LLD characteristics such as is demonstrated by curve 2 of
Electrical systems operating light sources that experience LLD are well known in the art; methods of addressing LLD, including one method of incremental power increases, may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635 and commercially available from Musco Lighting, LLC, Oskaloosa, Iowa, USA under the trade name SMART LAMP®.
In the current state of the art, power adjustments to address energy conservation are generally completed by dimming or switching the circuits in the electrical system to achieve preset high/low levels. One way preservation of the quantity of light output in an electrical system may be completed is by adding capacitance at preset times and in preset quantities to a power regulating component (where power regulating component refers to a component operatively in connection between the main power and the light source which has the ability to change power provided to the light source) within the system. However, as will be discussed, there are limitations to using the aforementioned approaches to adjust power to a light source.
1. Energy Conservation—Dimming Circuits
Using sports lighting applications as an example, one common method to conserve energy is to operate a light source at a lower power level when less illumination is deemed acceptable by owners, participants, or by regulations set forth by lighting organizations; one such organization is the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). IESNA Publication No. RP-6-01 recommends minimum illumination levels based on the type of sport, skill level, and number of spectators; however, many sports lighting systems are used for multiple purposes that may require different levels of illumination (e.g. a soccer field that is used for practice but also for tournaments). Such electrical systems would need to be designed for the highest level of illumination required for tournament play based on the skill level of the players and the number of spectators, but would benefit from a lower illumination level available for practice. Operating at a lower power setting (and therefore a lower illumination level) during off-peak operating conditions results in energy conservation.
Generally, one way a sports lighting system operating a light source may switch from a high power setting to a lower power setting is by changing from a higher capacitance state to a lower capacitance state, commonly referred to as dimming the circuit. However, if a sports lighting system operates a plurality of light sources, dimming the circuits requires a plurality of capacitors for each light source. In addition, extra switching components are required to control the capacitors for each light source. For example, in sports or wide area lighting, due to the available space in a pole cabinet 50,
2. Energy Conservation—Switching Circuits
A method to conserve energy in an electrical system operating a plurality of light sources, particularly a sports lighting system, is to utilize switching groups that operate a subset of the total number of light sources for lower illumination levels, and operate the total number of light sources for higher illumination levels. While this method addresses energy conservation, additional light sources are often required to ensure adequate beam distribution to attain illumination uniformity; again see IESNA Publication No. RP-6-01. Adding additional light sources to an electrical system, including the respective switching mechanisms to control the light sources, may add capital equipment cost, as well as cost from increased energy consumption. Additionally, the light sources in different switching groups may accumulate uneven operating hours if some groups are used more frequently than others; imbalance of operating hours may prevent illumination uniformity due to uneven LLD of the light sources.
3. Preservation of Light Output—Changing Capacitance
One approach to preserving the quantity of light output in an electrical system operating a light source is to make incremental increases to capacitance; see aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635. In one embodiment described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635, an electric timer-motor rotates cams that, in turn, actuate switches, relays, or contactors to sequentially add capacitors to the lighting circuit at times determined by the physical configuration of the electric-timer motor and cams (for reference, see FIGS. 3, 10-13 in U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635). Each cam is configured to rotate to a position that operates a switch at a preset time when additional capacitance is required to increase power to the light source. Generally, such increases in capacitance are utilized to compensate for LLD and to maintain constant light output. The preset timing is generally modeled after lumen depreciation curves for a given light source.
The effectiveness of adjusting power to light sources in an electrical system using currently available means of changing capacitance tends to be limited by the physical space required to provide a plurality of capacitors with traditional switching mechanisms, and the general inflexibility of capacitance changing systems. Improved methods of switch control, coupled with a combinational approach to changing capacitance, are envisioned for a variety of apparatuses. One typical application may be large area outdoor sports lighting systems and the power regulating components therein, but any electrical system or power regulating component of an electrical system operating a light source would likewise benefit.
It is of note that the aforementioned reference to power regulating component(s), and any mention of power regulating component(s) or power regulating circuits within this text, is intended to convey that an apparatus, operatively connected between the main power and the light, has the ability to change and thus regulate power provided to the light source. In these embodiments, the change in power level is effectuated by the selective actuation of switching mechanisms further described in the exemplary embodiments.
It is therefore a principle object, feature, advantage, or aspect of the present invention to improve over the state of the art.
It is a further object, feature, advantage, or aspect of the present invention to solve problems and deficiencies in the state of the art.
Further objects, features, advantages, or aspects of the present invention may include one or more of the following:
These and other objects, features, advantages, or aspects of the present invention will become more apparent with reference to the accompanying specification.
A method according to one aspect of the present invention comprises providing for each light source circuit a plurality of possible operating power levels and selectively switching in one or any combination of the plurality of power regulating components of the light source circuit to effectuate operating power levels.
An apparatus according to one aspect of the present invention comprises a plurality of switching mechanisms, each switching mechanism controlling a quantity of operating power to a light source or plurality of light sources; and a selectively controllable actuator for each switch; so that combinational power selections are available for the light source(s) by actuation of one or more switching mechanisms.
A method according to another aspect of the present invention comprises integration of improved switching methods and combinational capacitance in a wide area or sports lighting system to provide a flexible method of power control for the purposes of energy conservation, preserving the quantity of light output, maintaining constant light output, or otherwise. In one example, the flow of power to a light source may generally be characterized by the following:
From time-to-time in this description reference will be taken to the drawings which are identified by figure number and are summarized below.
To further understanding of the present invention, several specific exemplary embodiments according to the present invention will be described in detail. Certain exemplary embodiments envision improved switching methods that may be combined with a power regulating component comprised of a parallel-connected bank of capacitors such that any combination of capacitors may be switched in and out of the light source circuit to achieve a desired power level. This combinational switching approach allows a relatively small group of capacitors to provide a large range of capacitance values for a single light source, or a plurality of light sources, from a single switch control. Alternate embodiments are also described.
Frequent mention will be made in this description to the drawings. Reference numbers will be used to indicate certain parts in the drawings. The same reference numbers will be used to indicate the same parts throughout the drawings (for example, 53 to denote the capacitor bank).
There are a variety of methods utilized in the current state of the art to permit the power level to a light source to be increased or decreased as desired. Electrical systems such as that illustrated in
Optionally, earth grounding to protect against adverse electrical effects, such as lightning, may be provided via earth grounds 80 connected to the pole cabinet 50 according to well known practices. Equipment grounding may be provided via equipment ground 81 connected to the distribution cabinet 30 and via equipment ground wire 82 according to well known practices.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635, incorporated by reference herein, addresses power level adjustments using methods such as adding capacitors to the capacitor bank 53 to control capacitance to the light source 61, or alternatively adding taps to the ballast 51 to control line voltage to the light source 61, or alternatively adding taps to the power source supplying power line 21 to the electrical system to control line voltage to the primary side of the ballast 51, and therefore, the light source 61. The methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635 address LLD concerns by making sequentially additive power adjustments at pre-determined intervals based on known depreciation curves for a particular light source, primarily to maintain a constant or near-constant light output. The methods in U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635 may benefit from the improved switching methods described herein such that the accuracy of switch timing is improved and remote operation of switching methods is practical.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/035,994, incorporated by reference herein, discusses alternative methods of adding capacitance to systems such as that illustrated in
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/842,853 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,956,551 on Jun. 7, 2011, and incorporated by reference herein, addresses power level adjustments using methods as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635, but also addresses dimming of circuits to address energy conservation as in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,994,718, incorporated by reference herein. However, the methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,956,551 address remote operation and a more flexible approach to changing capacitance for the MULTI-WATT™ portion of the light source circuit only; the SMART LAMP® portion of the circuit still makes sequentially additive power adjustments at pre-determined intervals based on known depreciation curves for a particular light source.
Also utilized in the current state of the art are methods for adjusting power to a light source via electronic/solid-state means (e.g. microprocessors, transistors, etc.). While such means may improve the accuracy of switch control, electronic/solid-state means of adjusting power to a light source are susceptible to electrical surges much like the electronic timer in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/035,994. Some of the improved switching methods described herein comprise electronic control coupled with a solenoid switching mechanism that is more robust than use of current state of the art electronic/solid-state switching mechanisms.
The exemplary embodiments described herein improve upon the current state of the art to create a flexible method of power control to a light source by taking a combinational approach to changing capacitance, improving the robustness and timing of existing switching methods, and making remote operation of the switching methods practical. Aspects according to the present invention may be applied to a variety of light source circuits and electrical systems, particularly those in the aforementioned current art.
1. Combinational Capacitance
A typical embodiment of the invention comprises a capacitor bank as in 53,
Capacitors C1, C2, C3, and C4 are independently switchable or in combinational fashion in parallel with each other in the light source circuit (e.g. see
By “combinational”, it is meant that any one or more of the parallel capacitors in the bank 53, and thus their capacitance values, may be independently selected for electrical connection into the light source circuit to provide an operating power level to the light source; specifically that (a) any one of the plural capacitors in the bank 53 may be selected or (b) any combination of two, or more if more than two in the bank 53, may be selected/combined. As is well known, connecting any two or more capacitors in parallel will have an additive effect on total capacitance value (i.e. it will be the sum of the capacitance values of the individual capacitors). The term “combinational” includes that ability to add or combine any two or more capacitors and associated capacitance values to the light source circuit at any time, but also includes selecting and adding just one capacitor and associated capacitance value to the light source circuit at any time. Any single capacitor may be selected at any time, or any two or more capacitors may be.
The capacitance values in Table 1 may be applied to the capacitor bank 53 of
2. Improved Switching Methods
To achieve a combinational approach to changing capacitance, the switching methods must allow any combination of capacitors to be engaged or disengaged at any given time. As may be seen from Table 1, adjusting power from one level to another may require some capacitors to be disconnected and a different set of capacitors to be engaged simultaneously. In addition to simultaneous switching, it may be beneficial for the switching methods to be rapid and accurate so that precise changes in capacitance may occur, and to prevent electrical current from arcing across the gap between the switch and the capacitor switch contact, thus leading to contact damage. Further, it may be beneficial for the switching methods to be controlled remotely to provide flexibility; however, it may also be beneficial for the control components of the switching methods to be electrically isolated such that the overall assembly is robust.
An example of a current art switching method utilizing the capacitor bank 53,
The system illustrated in
A generalized exemplary embodiment according to at least some aspects of the present invention is illustrated in
Operation of the solenoids 240 illustrated in
The improved switching methods illustrated in
A more specific exemplary embodiment, utilizing aspects of the generalized example described above, will now be described. An electrical system operating a capacitor bank utilizing a plurality of capacitors as illustrated in
With respect to Table 2, Capacitor 1 is a base capacitor that typically remains in the circuit; note Capacitor 1 (as is illustrated by C1,
Switching of the capacitors in the light source circuit illustrated in
Details of the switching mechanism 120 in
In one embodiment, external feedback 57 to the circuit control 58 is provided via photocell or other light sensing device. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/963,084, incorporated by reference herein, discusses methods of compensating for degradation of the quantity of light output, due to LLD or otherwise, in a light source by sensing illumination levels and comparing against the pre-programmed operating profile. If sensed illumination level from the photocell differs from the anticipated illumination level based on the pre-programmed profile derived from known depreciation curves by a certain amount (e.g. 5%), the circuit control 58 will send an actuation signal 123 to the solenoids 240,
It is of note
An alternative embodiment of the invention envisions an electrical system operating a capacitor bank utilizing a plurality of capacitors as illustrated in
It is of note that, as in
An alternative embodiment of the invention envisions an electrical system operating a capacitor bank utilizing a plurality of capacitors as illustrated in
As may be seen from
As may be seen from
While this alternative embodiment is limited to preset combinations of capacitance changes due to the physical tolerances of the cams 220, there may be benefits over existing cam/motor systems. For example, existing cam/motor systems require a motor with significant gear reduction to accommodate the continuous rotation of the cams 220, requiring significant space in the electrical enclosure housing the switching mechanism(s). The present embodiment only rotates the cams 220 when the solenoid 240 receives an actuation signal 123,
An alternative embodiment of the invention envisions an electrical system operating a capacitor bank utilizing a plurality of capacitors as illustrated in
As may be seen from
While this alternative embodiment does not benefit from the improved solenoid switching methods as in Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiments 1 and 2, there may be benefits over existing cam/motor systems. For example, each capacitor may be switched in or out of the light source circuit in any combination at any time, giving the system significant flexibility.
An alternative embodiment of the invention envisions an electrical system operating a ballast from which multiple taps are accessed to vary the incoming power to a capacitor bank (in this example, the capacitor bank utilizing a single capacitor as illustrated in
With regards to U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635, power to the light source is adjusted by switching between taps on the primary side of a lead-peak ballast; technical detail regarding the ballast design may be found in FIG. 7 and Table 2 in U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635. The primary limitation of adjusting power by such methods is the complex switching mechanisms that ensure switching overlaps to prevent interruptions to power distribution. Modification of the light source circuit illustrated in FIG. 7 in U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635 to utilize the improved switching methods described herein produces the light source circuit illustrated in
In the present embodiment switch timing and accuracy may be improved through use of the solenoid switching 120, as the switching method illustrated in FIG. 7 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,176,635 utilizes a traditional cam and motor assembly. Use of solenoid switching 120 may eliminate the need for switches to overlap to ensure continuity of power distribution. Additionally, switching between taps on the ballast 51 conserves space in the pole cabinet 50 and reduces cost compared to systems utilizing a plurality of capacitors to adjust power.
Also, because power levels can be adjusted by changing taps on the primary side, secondary side, or both sides of the ballast that is in the lamp circuit, the capacitor bank 53, in this embodiment, need only have a base capacitor of the capacitance value indicated for the lamp. Note though that optionally, there could be a capacitor bank of plural capacitors individually and independently switchable into parallel with the lamp (such as in previous embodiments) that could be used in combination with the ballast tap switching described with this embodiment to give even more power options for the lamp.
As mentioned previously, the invention may take many forms and embodiments. The foregoing examples are but a few of those. To give some sense of some options and alternatives, a few examples are given below.
Generally, the exemplary embodiments described herein illustrate a complete electrical circuit for a single light source (see
Methods of improved switching and adjusting power through combinational capacitance as exemplified by the embodiments described herein may be combined to produce a composite electrical system without departing from at least some aspects of the invention. For example, published U.S. Patent Application US2008/0150451 A1, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,982,404 on Jul. 19, 2011 and incorporated by reference herein, discusses methods of switching capacitors in and out of a capacitor bank together with switching between taps on a ballast to adjust power to a light source. Such a system would benefit from both Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiments 1 and 2 (thus providing improved switching methods to the capacitor bank) and Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiment 5 (thus providing improved switching methods to the ballast).
As stated in Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiments 1-3 and Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiment 5, external feedback 57 may be provided via photocell. It is of note that any external device capable of comparing illumination levels at different times (whether actual or perceived) at a source (whether a target area or the light source) may be utilized and not depart from aspects of the invention. It is also of note that the feedback 57 may be used by a plurality of circuit controls (e.g. whether a plurality of circuit controls within a single electrical enclosure (e.g. pole cabinet 50) or a combination of circuit controls within a plurality of electrical enclosures) to adjust power to their respective light source(s). Alternatively, several photocells (or other illumination sensing devices) may be utilized to produce a composite feedback 57 to a circuit control (or plurality of circuit controls). Other external feedback is possible. Examples include but are not limited to sensed light levels (whether at the lamp or a target area) from devices other than photocells (e.g. photodiodes), sensed light levels from other sources of illumination (e.g. other light sources at the same site location), temperature, humidity, wind conditions (e.g. speed, direction, etc.), or other feedback deemed useful to the application.
As stated in Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiments 1-3 and Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiment 5, methods or means to adjust power to a light source were enabled by a pulsed solenoid operated by a circuit control. It is of note that a variety of solenoid types (e.g. pulsed, latching, etc.) under a variety of operating conditions (e.g. AC driven, continuous duty, etc.) for a given type of light source may be utilized and not depart from aspects of the invention.
As stated in Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiments 1, 3, and 5, methods or means of remotely controlling the circuit control 58 was enabled by a central server (i.e. CONTROL-LINK®) communicating wirelessly to the antenna 43 and moderator module 42. It is of note that any of a variety of methods or means of communicating between a central server and the moderator module 42 (whether wireless or otherwise) may be utilized and not depart from at least some aspects of the invention. It is also of note that means of communicating remote control 45, external feedback 57, and user control 32 functionalities from the moderator module 42 to the circuit control 58 are not limited to the power line carrier technology described herein. Any of a variety of methods or means of communicating between the moderator module 42 (or analogous component) and the circuit control 58 may be utilized and not depart from aspects of the invention. It is of further note that, similar to the feedback 57, the remote control 45 and user control 32 functionalities may be utilized by a plurality of circuit controls (e.g. whether a plurality of circuit controls within a single pole cabinet 50 or a combination of circuit controls within a plurality of pole cabinets 50) to adjust power to their respective light source(s).
As stated in Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiments 2, 3, and 5, remote control functionality may be omitted and the circuit control 59 modified from circuit control 58 such that if the switch feedback circuits 122 indicate a failure to initialize a particular operating profile, the controller 56 may attempt to initialize the operating profile two more times before switching to a different operating profile. It is of note that any number of initialization attempts, as well as any number of operating profiles, may be utilized and not depart from aspects of the invention.
As stated in Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiment 3, methods or means to adjust power to a light source was enabled by a mechanical escapement 280,
As stated in Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiment 4, methods or means to adjust power to a light source was enabled by a selector switch 270,
As stated in Exemplary Method and Apparatus Embodiment 5, means to adjust power to a light source was enabled by switching between multiple taps on the primary side of a lead-peak ballast. It is of note that the improved solenoid switching method 120,
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to provisional U.S. application Ser. No. 61/201,066, filed Dec. 5, 2008, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4005336 | Casella | Jan 1977 | A |
4009387 | Nuver | Feb 1977 | A |
4189664 | Hirschfeld | Feb 1980 | A |
4189964 | Gray | Feb 1980 | A |
4292570 | Engel | Sep 1981 | A |
4384239 | Davenport | May 1983 | A |
4434388 | Carver et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4442382 | Fleck | Apr 1984 | A |
4451763 | Sodini | May 1984 | A |
4475065 | Bhalla et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4501994 | Spreadbury | Feb 1985 | A |
4623860 | Baker et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4725934 | Gordin | Feb 1988 | A |
4816974 | Gordin | Mar 1989 | A |
4891562 | Nuckolls et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4924109 | Weber | May 1990 | A |
4931701 | Carl | Jun 1990 | A |
4947303 | Gordin et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4994718 | Gordin | Feb 1991 | A |
5075828 | Gordin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5103143 | Daub | Apr 1992 | A |
5134557 | Gordin et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5161883 | Gordin et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5229681 | Gordin et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5272418 | Howe et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5391966 | Garrison | Feb 1995 | A |
5434763 | Hege et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5442177 | Boulos et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442261 | Bank et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5463285 | El-Hamamsy | Oct 1995 | A |
5469027 | Uchihashi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475360 | Guidette et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5519286 | Rodrigues et al. | May 1996 | A |
5751116 | Thomas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5856326 | Anthony et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5856721 | Gordin et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5883557 | Pawlak et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5962988 | Nuckolls et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6031340 | Brosius | Feb 2000 | A |
6075326 | Nostwick | Jun 2000 | A |
6114816 | Nuckolls et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6150772 | Crane | Nov 2000 | A |
6172469 | Kern | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175195 | Janczak et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188161 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188181 | Sinha et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191568 | Poletti | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194847 | Hollaway | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6207943 | Smelker | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215254 | Honda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225760 | Moan | May 2001 | B1 |
6316923 | Poletti | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320323 | Buell et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340261 | Furukawa | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6373201 | Morgan et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6376996 | Olson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400103 | Adamson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6456960 | Williams et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6501231 | Hyland et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6515430 | Kayser | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6545429 | Flory, IV | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545433 | Beij et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6577075 | Romano et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583574 | Ann et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6681110 | Crookham et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6713973 | Erhardt | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6774768 | Flory, IV | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798153 | Mattas et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6864645 | Sun et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7038390 | Swami et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7176635 | Gordin et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176867 | Lee | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7385360 | Dluzniak | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7429828 | Cleland et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7432670 | Yamashita et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7589480 | Greenwood et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7675251 | Gordin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7734356 | Cleland et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7834555 | Cleland et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7956551 | Gordin | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7956556 | Gordin et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7982404 | Gordin | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20020089293 | Romano et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020185980 | Beij et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030025463 | Mattas et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030090215 | Beasley | May 2003 | A1 |
20050184681 | Gordin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060071610 | Dluzniak | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070001617 | Pogodayev et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070040513 | Cleland et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043540 | Cleland et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043541 | Cleland et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070070571 | Gordin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080150451 | Gordin | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004237249 | Nov 2004 | AU |
1288803 | Sep 1991 | CA |
19540326 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19912517 | Sep 2000 | DE |
0439358 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0536877 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0536877 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0669788 | Aug 1995 | EP |
6163163 | Jun 1994 | JP |
9180886 | Jul 1997 | JP |
148059 | Dec 1990 | TW |
2005036877 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005084086 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2008037118 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61201066 | Dec 2008 | US |