The present disclosure is generally related to analysis of containers, and more particularly is related to detecting objects and activity within a container.
Containers such as conduits, pipes, hoses, smokestacks, and the like, are utilized for the transportation and transmission of fluids, which includes liquids, gases, plasmas, and similar materials. Other containers, such as vessels, tanks, and storage facilities may be used to hold fluids for periods of time. With containers used for either or both transportation and/or storage of fluids, it is often the case that particulate matter within the fluids can build up within the interior of the containers over time, which may result in damage to the container or damage downstream from a container. This particulate may collect on the inner surface of the container and build up obstructions to fluid transmission.
When an obstruction is suspected, or pressure buildup is detected, or performance is lagging, the container must go through a maintenance procedure, wherein it is often taken offline so it can be flushed out and cleaned. This can be an expensive and time consuming process due to the effort involved in accessing the interior of the containers and performing the cleaning procedures. Additionally, the time the container is offline commonly results in a loss of productivity and revenue for an entity operating the container.
In a more specific situation, it is common for industrial containers, and especially those used in the oil and gas industry, to have sludge form on the bottom of the container, often from sediment gravitationally settling to the bottom. For example, according to an investigation conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), each refinery in the USA produces an annual average of 30,000 tons of oily sludge. It is estimated that, in 2001, large oil refineries (processing (2-5)×105 barrels per day) in the USA, produced 10,000 m3 of sludge and in India about 50,000 tons. Total production of sludge goes up because of the increasing demand for refined petroleum products worldwide.
The sediment on the bottom of a container in many industries has an uneven surface due to liquid flow over the sludge over a period of time. This uneven surface is characteristic for oil and gas industry as well as construction water processing. Within the oil industry specifically, the sediment at the bottom of the oil tanks mostly contains crystalized paraffin wax. The process of the sediment settling at the bottom of the tanks occurs naturally due to gravity and density of the sediment relative to the fluid in the tank. In one example, it is common for there to be several layers of sediment that build up on the bottom of the tank, and often, a layer of water forms on the top of the sediment. The crude oil is then located above the layer of water, and a layer of air is positioned above the crude oil. The sludge itself in crude oil tanks is typically made of up of water, petroleum hydrocarbons, and solids.
It is important to know the volume of the sediment at the bottom of the tank since this knowledge allows one to accurately estimate the crude oil in the tank and provides information on when to clean the bottom of the tank. For example, the sludge at the bottom of a crude oil tank can reach to 6-8 feet, which if not accounted for, can significantly affect an estimate of the volume of crude oil in a tank. In the construction industry, water from construction sites must be treated in a sedimentation tank before it can be sent to the outside of the construction site. This prevents solids like sand and grit from settling and blocking the flow. Accounting for the amount of sedimentation at the bottom of the tank allows for an accurate understanding of how much water can be processed through the tank and when the tank needs to be cleaned, among other aspects.
Thus, a heretofore unaddressed need exists in the industry to address the aforementioned deficiencies and inadequacies.
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide an apparatus, system, and method for the detection of an object within a container. Briefly described, in architecture, one embodiment of the apparatus, among others, can be implemented as follows. A container has a quantity of fluid within an interior space thereof. At least one object is within the interior space of the container and in contact with the fluid. A plurality of acoustic sensors is mounted on an exterior surface of the container. A plurality of acoustic signals is transmitted into the container by at least a portion of the plurality of acoustic sensors, wherein each of the acoustic sensors is capable of transmitting the acoustic signals to a remainder of the plurality of acoustic sensors, and receiving acoustic signals from the remainder of the plurality of acoustic sensors concurrently. At least one echo of at least one of the acoustic signals is altered by the at least one object within the quantity of fluid, wherein each of the plurality of acoustic sensors is capable of receiving echoes. A computerized device has a processor and is in communication with each of the plurality of acoustic sensors, wherein the processor controls the transmission of acoustic signals and collects data representing the received signals and received echoes, wherein the object within the container is detected based on at least one of the received signals and the received echoes.
The present disclosure can also be viewed as providing methods of detecting an object within a container. In this regard, one embodiment of such a method, among others, can be broadly summarized by the following steps: providing a container having a quantity of fluid within an interior space thereof, wherein at least one object is within the interior space of the container and in contact with the fluid; mounting a plurality of acoustic sensors on an exterior surface of the container; transmitting a plurality of acoustic signals into the container by at least a portion of the plurality of acoustic sensors, wherein each of the acoustic sensors is capable of transmitting the acoustic signals to a remainder of the plurality of acoustic sensors, and receiving acoustic signals from the remainder of the plurality of acoustic sensors concurrently; contacting the at least one object with one or more of the plurality of transmitted acoustic signals, wherein the one or more of the plurality of transmitted acoustic signals is altered to generate at least one echo; receiving the at least one echo at one or more of the plurality of acoustic sensors; collecting data representing the transmitted acoustic signals and the received echoes with a computerized device having a processor, the computerized device in communication with each of the plurality of acoustic sensors; and detecting the object within the container based on at least one of the transmitted acoustic signals and the received echoes.
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide an apparatus, system, and method for analyzing a sediment surface within a tank. Briefly described, in architecture, one embodiment of the apparatus, among others, can be implemented as follows. The apparatus has at least two acoustic transducers. A first of the two acoustic transducers is positioned on a first side of the container, and a second of the two acoustic transducers is positioned on a second side of the container. At least one acoustic signal is angularly transmitted through a fluid material within the container by the first acoustic transducer, wherein the at least one acoustic signal reflects off a sediment surface and is received at the second acoustic transducer. A computerized device has a processor and is in communication with at least two acoustic transducers, wherein the processor analyzes the sediment surface based on the reflection of the at least one acoustic signal.
The present disclosure can also be viewed as providing methods for analyzing a sediment surface, or any other surface produced by different materials interfacing with each other within a container. In this regard, one embodiment of such a method, among others, can be broadly summarized by the following steps: providing at least two acoustic transducers, wherein a first of the two acoustic transducers is positioned on a first side of the container, and a second of the two acoustic transducers is positioned on a second side of the container; angularly transmitting at least one acoustic signal through a fluid material within the container by the first acoustic transducer; reflecting the at least one acoustic signal off a sediment surface; receiving the at least one acoustic signal at the second acoustic transducer; and analyzing, with a computerized device having a processor in communication with at least two acoustic transducers, the at least one acoustic signal reflected off the sediment surface.
Other systems, methods, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the present disclosure, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Many aspects of the disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
To improve upon the shortcomings discussed in the Background, it is desirable to be able to detect both the content of particulate matter within the fluid in a container, and the buildup of particulate matter within the container, as well as any static or dynamic surfaces or objects. Being able to detect this particulate matter or surfaces allows for early detection of issues and pinpointed maintenance to be performed on the container when it is needed, rather than at predetermined intervals of time. Performing maintenance and cleaning only when necessary can help limit the downtime of the container, thus saving costs. For the accumulation of sludge within petroleum containers, being able to track and identify the sludge buildup can allow operators to know the volume of the container, such that they will be better prepared to prevent an overfill or underfill situation. Additionally, this same technique can be used to identify any other internal surface or object within a container.
As illustrated in
The acoustic transducers 30 may be any form of acoustic sensor which is capable of emitting and/or receiving acoustic signals. In
The acoustic signals 40 penetrate the container 20 wall and are received through the wall of the container 20. Sending the acoustic signals 40 through neighboring acoustic transducers 30, as illustrated in
While the system 10 may be used in a variety of industries with various containers 20 holding different materials, in one example the system 10 is used within the petroleum industry. More specifically, the container 20 may be a petroleum pipeline or petroleum tank and the sediment or precipitate buildup may be paraffin wax, which is naturally occurring within oil, gas, and other petroleum products. For the oil and gas industry, the system 10 may be used in large tanks, as well as in pipelines to detect paraffin wax precipitation close to the wall, such that these precipitations of paraffin wax are not left unnoticed and cause flow obstructions or slowdowns. This information will prevent pipeline shut down for maintenance, which is usually a very expensive and time consuming process.
All receiving acoustic transducers 30 are connected to the computerized device 50, which may be a hub or controller with electronic processing capabilities which allow it to evaluate any parameter of the signals 40. The connection between the acoustic transducers 30 and the computerized device 50 may include any type of communication network 52 or network connection. The computerized device 50 and communication network 52 within
In one example of operation of the system 10, one or more acoustic transducers 30 emits one or more acoustic signals 40 into the container 20. Then, another acoustic transducer 30 sends a signal 40 to all other acoustic transducers 30. This process creates an array of acoustic transducers 30 of a variable number and configuration. While the acoustic transducers 30 in
The signal 40 sent from a first acoustic transducer 30 to all other acoustic transducers 30 can be received directly without any additional echoes. If there are N number of acoustic transducers 30, in any moment, one acoustic transducer 30 can be sent N−1 signals 40, which will be received by the N−1 other acoustic transducers 30 and then transmitted to the computerized device 50. If there are no objects 14 floating through the liquid, no further signals 40 may be received. Any additional signals 40, in the form of echoes 42 indicates the presence of an object 14 within the fluid 12 that has reflected a portion of a signal 40. Through triangulation, the computerized device 50 can determine where the object 14 is located within the container 20. For example, the location of the object 14 can be inside the cross section of the container or pipeline where the acoustic transducers 30 are located, or it can be determined to be a distance from the acoustic transducers 30. Additionally, one acoustic transducer 30 can send one signal that can be received by any number of other transducers at any moment of time and then repeated in any time pattern, thereby generating echoes which are regular, random, or based on the processing of previous echoes or reflections from the computerized device 50.
In
In another example, the object 14 may include a plurality of small particulate which moves or floats through the container 20. For instance, with petroleum containers, the objects 14 may be asphaltene particles that encapsulate crystallized paraffin wax. This happens in the “cloud phase” of paraffin wax precipitation and can be detected. Both the size and the concentration of these particles can be ascertained using the system 10 since the smaller particles would reflect the acoustic signals 40 or sound waves differently, as identified through variations in frequencies and/or wavelengths. Additionally, the polycrystalline structure of the paraffin wax is susceptible to reflecting the acoustic signals 40 and in the initial phases of crystallization it would reflect additional echoes 42 by scattering the signal 40.
Each of the acoustic transducers 30 is also capable of receiving echoes 42 of the signals 40 created by the objects, such as particulate matter. The computerized device 50 (not illustrated in
As shown at block 102, a container has a quantity of fluid within an interior space thereof, wherein at least one object is within the interior space of the container and in contact with the fluid. A plurality of acoustic sensors is mounted on an exterior surface of the container (block 104). A plurality of acoustic signals is transmitted into the container by at least a portion of the plurality of acoustic sensors, wherein each of the acoustic sensors is capable of transmitting the acoustic signals to a remainder of the plurality of acoustic sensors, and receiving acoustic signals from the remainder of the plurality of acoustic sensors concurrently (block 106). The at least one object is contacted with one or more of the plurality of transmitted acoustic signals, wherein the one or more of the plurality of transmitted acoustic signals is altered to generate at least one echo (block 108). The at least one echo is received at one or more of the plurality of acoustic sensors (block 110). Data representing the transmitted acoustic signals and the received echoes is collected with a computerized device having a processor, the computerized device in communication with each of the plurality of acoustic sensors (block 112). The object is detected within the container based on at least one of the transmitted acoustic signals and the received echoes (block 114). Any number of additional steps, functions, processes, or variants thereof may be included in the method, including any disclosed relative to any other figure of this disclosure.
As noted previously, the detection of objects 14 within a container 20 may be used to identify various parameters of the object 14, such as its size, movement, velocity, etc., as described relative to
To provide clarity in disclosure, the apparatus 210 is described relative to use with crude oil, in which case, as shown in
With the two acoustic sensors 220, 230 positioned on the sides 242, 244 of the container 240, at least one acoustic signal 250 (depicted in broken lines) is angularly transmitted by the first acoustic transducer 220 through a fluid material within the container 240. In the case of
In one example, the first transducer 220 is a rotating transducer which is capable of rotating about an axis positioned substantially perpendicular to the sidewall of the container 240. For a container 240 that is cylindrical, the axis of the first acoustic transducer 220 may traverse substantially through a center point of the container 240. The direction of the acoustic signal transmitted may be off-center, such that it is angularly directed towards a sediment surface 212A or the water surface 214A within the container 240, as opposed to directly across the container 240 without contacting a sediment or water surface 212A, 214A. As the first transducer 220 rotates about this axis, the transmitted acoustic signal 250 will have a directional movement which correlates to the position of the transducer 220 as it rotates, which allows a plurality of acoustic signals 250 to be transmitted to a large number of points along the sediment surface 212A and the water surface 214A. This rotation of the first transducer 220 along with continuous, near continuous, or periodic signal transmission allows for the acoustic signals 250 to be sent at various angles into the container 240, thereby allowing them to scan a large portion of the surface 212A of the sediment 212 on the bottom of the container 240.
The receipt of these signals allows for an effective three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the surface 212A of the sediment 212, which can be then used to provide additional information about the sediment 212 or the container 240. For instance, the 3D reconstruction of the sediment surface 212A can be used to calculate the exact or near exact surface features of the sediment 212. It can also be used, in combination with other parameters and information about the container 240, the materials within the container 240, or related information, to provide the volume, position, or weight of the sediment 212. In turn, this information can be used to determine the exact or near exact volume, weight, or position of the water 214 or crude oil 216 within the container 240.
One of the parameters which may be used to provide this information is the temperature of the materials within the container 240. The temperature may be measured using separate process or with one or a plurality of thermometers 260 positioned on the outside, inside, or sidewall of the container 240. Information from thermometers 260 can be used to interpolate the temperature of the materials within the container 240 over a period of time. Another parameter which may be measured for accurate analysis of the sediment 212 is any flow of materials within the container 240, such as movement of materials due to inlet or outlet pipes. Additionally, for crude oil containers, the level of oil in the container 240 can be used for predicting how much sediment 212 is still in the crude oil 216, if the volume, the density, and the composition of the crude oil 216 is known.
Measurements with the apparatus 210 may be performed periodically, such as hourly, daily, weekly, or along another time period, since the amount of sediment 212 within the container 240 is prone to changing over time. While the exact makeup of the sediment 212 within the container 240 will vary depending on the materials stored in the container 240, for a crude oil container, the sediment 212 typically includes water, solids, and hydrocarbons. The sediment 212 settles over a period of time to form the sediment layer on the bottom of the container 240. The process of sediment accrual may also depend on the composition of the crude oil, the temperature, the amount of water and sediments, as well as the mechanical flow of the fluid inside the container 240.
Additionally, it is noted that knowing the size of the container 240 can assist the analysis of the sediment 212. Specifically, knowing the size of the container 240 can help with evaluating the potential acoustic signal path of the waves. From the time of flight in a pitch-catch scenario, with the signal 250 transmitted from one transducer 220 and received by the other transducer 230, it is possible to estimate the number of bounces and legs that the signal 250 has taken and the reflections from both the surface of the sediment 212A and the water surface 214A. Moreover, knowing the temperature of the water 214 and absorption parameters, it is possible to estimate how many reflections of the signal 250 are from the sediment surface 212A and/or from the water surface 214A abutting the crude oil layer 216.
It is further noted that for situations where a container 240 is recently filled with materials, or where the materials experience mixing or similar action, there may not be discernable layers of the various materials. Rather, it can take time for the various materials to settle into the layers within the container 240. Accordingly, this initial phase of settling of the sediment 212 is in a form of emulsion that does not form a defined impedance barrier between the water 214 and the sediment 212. In this case, it is still possible to measure an increased density and viscosity of the non-separated materials in the container 240 with a shorter signal path. For instance, instead of determining the signal reflections against the material surfaces, it is possible to use transducers which are positioned a shorter distance from one another, such as non-radially positioned on a cylindrical container 240 versus transducers 220, 230 which are positioned on opposite sides of the container 240. The signal 250 in this case would not be sent through the center of the container 240, but rather, would traverse through a shorter path or chord from one location on the container's 240 sidewall to another location.
The apparatus 210 may also be used with a computerized device, which may include various computers, data processors, or similar electronic control devices which can receive the signal information along with other information about the container 240 and/or the materials within the container 240 and output information desired by the user. Computationally, the apparatus 210 may allow a user to evaluate all reflection, refraction, and absorption of the acoustic signals 250 inside the 3D space occupied by water 214 on the top of the sediment 212 within a container 240. Using the determined sediment surface 212A and the dimensions of the container 240, or similar information such as container 240 volume, it is possible to calculate or estimate the amount of sediment 212 within the container and/or the weight of the sediment 212 or other material within the container 240. In turn, this can be used to inform the user how much sediment 212 needs to be removed from a container 240, for example. Accordingly, this mapping of the surface 212A of the sediment 212 and calculating the sediment volume and weight can provide significant benefits to industries which are required to maintain containers.
It is also noted that while
As is shown by block 302, at least two acoustic transducers are provided, wherein a first of the two acoustic transducers is positioned on a first side of the container, and a second of the two acoustic transducers is positioned on a second side of the container. At least one acoustic signal is angularly transmitted through a fluid material within the container by the first acoustic transducer (block 304). The at least one acoustic signal reflects off a sediment surface (block 306). The at least one acoustic signal is received at the second acoustic transducer (block 308). Using a computerized device having a processor in communication with at least two acoustic transducers, the at least one acoustic signal reflected off the sediment surface is analyzed (block 310). Any number of additional steps, functions, processes, or variants thereof may be included in the method, including any disclosed relative to any other figure of this disclosure.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present disclosure, particularly, any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) of the disclosure without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 63/122,336 entitled, “Apparatus, system, and method for the detection of contents and activity within a container” filed Dec. 7, 2020, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 63/121,720 entitled, “Three-dimensional reconstruction of a sediment surface at the bottom of a tank” filed Dec. 4, 2020, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2449054 | Chantlin | Sep 1948 | A |
3019650 | Worswick | Feb 1962 | A |
3703829 | Dougherty | Nov 1972 | A |
3837218 | Flambard et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3971962 | Green | Jul 1976 | A |
4065958 | Krylova et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4118983 | Braznikov | Oct 1978 | A |
4121468 | Glover | Oct 1978 | A |
4182177 | Prough | Jan 1980 | A |
4280126 | White | Jul 1981 | A |
4320659 | Lynnworth | Mar 1982 | A |
4501146 | Greenhalgh | Feb 1985 | A |
4580448 | Skrgatic | Apr 1986 | A |
4596266 | Kinghorn et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4676098 | Erlenkämper et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4852416 | Boone et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4934191 | Kroening et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4954997 | Dieulesaint et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4977780 | Machida et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5015995 | Holroyd | May 1991 | A |
5038611 | Weldon et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5148700 | King | Sep 1992 | A |
5195058 | Simon | Mar 1993 | A |
5295120 | McShane | Mar 1994 | A |
5325727 | Miller et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5415033 | Maresca, Jr. et al. | May 1995 | A |
5438868 | Holden et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5460046 | Maltby et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469749 | Shimada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5604314 | Grahn | Feb 1997 | A |
5770806 | Hiismaki | Jun 1998 | A |
5821427 | Byrd | Oct 1998 | A |
6035903 | Few et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6151956 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157894 | Hess et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6192751 | Stein et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6330831 | Lynnworth et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6368281 | Solomon et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6443006 | Degrave | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470744 | Usui et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481287 | Ashworth et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6513385 | Han | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6575043 | Huang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578424 | Ziola et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6631639 | Dam et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6672163 | Han et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6925868 | Young et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938488 | Diaz et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7085391 | Yamaya | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7114375 | Panetta et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7246522 | Diaz et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7299136 | DiFoggio et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7330797 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7363174 | Kishiro et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7624650 | Gysling et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7624651 | Fernald et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656747 | Mandal et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694570 | Dam et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7962293 | Gysling | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966882 | Greenwood | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8683882 | Jackson | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8820182 | Nikolay Nikolov et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8850882 | Qu et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8915145 | Van Orsdol | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9057677 | Field | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9557208 | Kuroda et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9891085 | Muhammad et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10122051 | Kuhne et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10458871 | Norli | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10794871 | Blackshire et al. | Oct 2020 | B1 |
11020793 | De Monte et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
20020170753 | Clare | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040079150 | Breed et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040173021 | Lizon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040226615 | Morikawa et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050055136 | Hofmann et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050128873 | LaBry | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050178198 | Freger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050247070 | Arshansky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060196224 | Esslinger | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070068253 | Carodiskey | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070157737 | Gysling et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070205907 | Schenk, Jr. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080092623 | Lynch | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090143681 | Jurvelin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100111133 | Yuhas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100199779 | Liu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100242593 | Lagergren et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110029262 | Barkhouse | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110072904 | Lam et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110120218 | Aldridge | May 2011 | A1 |
20110239769 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271769 | Kippersund et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110284288 | Sawyer et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120024067 | Oberdoerfer et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120055239 | Sinha | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120259560 | Woltring et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262472 | Garr et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281096 | Gellaboina | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130002443 | Breed et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130068027 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080081 | Dugger et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090575 | Rupp et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130120155 | Hagg | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128035 | Johns et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130213714 | Fuida | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140020478 | Ao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027455 | Castellano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140076415 | Dunki-Jacobs et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140107435 | Sharf et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140223992 | Harper et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140301902 | Fernald et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140375169 | Na et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150075278 | Dockendorff et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150212045 | Raykhman et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150247751 | Kutlik | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150260003 | McHugh et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150276463 | Milne et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150369647 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160025545 | Saltzgiver et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160041024 | Reimer et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160108730 | Fanini et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160146653 | Skelding | May 2016 | A1 |
20160169839 | Gottlieb et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160216141 | Leaders et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160320226 | Schaefer et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170002954 | Brown et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170010144 | Lenner et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170010145 | Lenner et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170010146 | Kassubek et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170059389 | Moore et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170082650 | Hies et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170087526 | Luharuka | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170102095 | Kunita et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170097322 | Giese et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170199295 | Mandal | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170202595 | Shelton, IV | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170239741 | Furuta | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170268915 | Gestner et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170309989 | Waelde et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180035603 | Kremmer et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180044159 | Crouse et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180080809 | Tokarev et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180149505 | Ploss et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180266874 | Montoya et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180299317 | Truong et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180306628 | Parrott et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180348169 | Lee et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190011304 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190063984 | Bowley | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190078927 | Takayama et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190137310 | Xiao et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190195629 | Vaissiere | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190195830 | Tamura et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190272496 | Moeller | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200018628 | Head et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200182736 | Kim et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200378283 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200378812 | Heim | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200378818 | Heim et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210382014 | Xu et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220178879 | Bivolarsky et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220178881 | Bivolarsky et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105548370 | May 2016 | CN |
10 2010 029 254 | Dec 2011 | DE |
2450701 | May 2012 | EP |
2962096 | Aug 2019 | EP |
2192717 | Jan 1990 | GB |
200174618 | Mar 2000 | KR |
WO 8704793 | Aug 1987 | SU |
WO 8809895 | Dec 1988 | WO |
WO 2007149605 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2014167471 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2020136945 | Jul 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amjad, Umar et al, “Advanced signal processing technique for damage detection in steel tubes” Proceedings of SPIE, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2016, 980511 (Apr. 1, 2016); 14 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al. “Change in time-to-time flight of longitudinal (axisymmetric) wave modes due to lamination in steel pipes” Proceedings of SPIE vol. 8695, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2013, 869515 (Apr. 17, 2013); 10 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al., “Effects of transducers on guided wave based structural health monitoring” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 10600, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems XII, 106000F (Apr. 23, 2018),10 pgs. |
Amjad, U. et al., “Generalized representations and universal aspects of Lamb wave dispersion relations” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7650, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2010, 76502F (Apr. 8, 2010), 9 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al., “Detection and quantification of pipe damage from change in time of flight and phase” Ultrasoncis vol. 62 (2015) pp. 223-236, Jun. 11, 2015, 14 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al., “Detection and quantification of diameter reduction due to corrosion in reinforcing steel bars” Structural Health Monitoring 2015, vol. 14(5) 532-543, 12 pgs. |
Amjad, Umar et al., “Detection and quantification of delamination in laminated plates from the phase of appropriate guided wave modes” Optical Engineering 55(1), Jan. 2016, 11 pgs. |
API: American Petroleum Institute Preliminary Program, Oct. 16-17, 2019, 5 pages. |
Gurkov, Andrey “Gigantic Druzhba oil pipeline paralyzed for weeks” May 7, 2019, 3 pages, https://www.dw.com/en/gigantic-druzhba-oil-pipeline-paralyzed-for-weeks/a-48638989. |
Hassanzadeh et al., “Investigation of factors affecting on viscosity reduction of sludge from Iranian crude oil storage tanks”, Petroleum Science, vol. 15, Jul. 2018, pp. 634-643. |
Kak et al., “Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging”, IEEE, 1988, Chapter 2, 48 pgs. |
Luck, Marissa “Deer Park fire a ‘blemish’ for the petrochemical industry's image” Houston Chronicle, Mar. 26, 2019, 3 pages https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/Deer-Park-fire-a-blemish-for-the-image-of-13717661.php. |
Pandey, “Ultrasonic attenuation in condensed matter”, Dissertation for V.B.S. Purvanchal University, 2009, Chapter 1, 36 pgs. |
Pluta et al., “Stress Dependent Dispersion Relations of Acoustic Waves Travelling on a Chain of Point Masses Connected by Anharmonic Linear and Torsional Springs” International Congress on Ultrasonics AIP Conf. Proc. 1433, 471-474 (2012); 5 pgs. |
Shelke, et al., “Mode-Selective Excitation and Detection of Ultrasonic Guided Waves for Delamination in Laminated Aluminum Plates” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 58, No. 3, Mar. 2011, 11 pgs. |
“TOPS Terminal Operating Practices Symposium” Program Agenda, Apr. 11, 2018, 1 page. |
Zadler, et al., “Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy: theory and application”, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 156, Issue 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 154-169. |
Examination Report No. 1 issued in Australian Application No. 2020283140 dated Jan. 4, 2022, 6 pgs. |
Examination Report No. 1 issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2020302919, dated Feb. 15, 2022, 4 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US20/35404, dated Aug. 24, 2020, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US20/39966, dated Sep. 18, 2020, 13 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US20/35404 dated Nov. 16, 2021, 8 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US20/39966 dated Dec. 28, 2021, 10 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/888,469, dated Dec. 23, 2020, 16 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/148,122 dated Jun. 16, 2021, 8 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/914,092 dated Oct. 28, 2021, 14 pgs. |
Office Action issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 3,140,008, dated Feb. 14, 2022, 4 pgs. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/888,469, dated Aug. 5, 2020, 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/888,469, dated Sep. 8, 2020, 20 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/914,092, dated Nov. 10, 2020, 22 pgs. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/914,092, dated Mar. 1, 2021, 25 pgs. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/914,092, dated Jun. 24, 2021, 24 pgs. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/148,122, dated Mar. 2, 2021, 26 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US21/61962 dated Feb. 16, 2022, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US21/61924 dated Feb. 16, 2022, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US21/62010 dated Feb. 16, 2022, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US21/61970 dated Feb. 18, 2022, 17 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US21/61925 dated Feb. 18, 2022, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US21/61646 dated Feb. 25, 2022, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US21/65664 dated Mar. 11, 2022, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US21/62001 dated Mar. 9, 2022, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US21/61926 dated Mar. 8, 2022, 9 pgs. |
Notice of Acceptance issued in Australian Application No. 2620302919 dated Mar. 2, 2022, 4 pgs. |
Notice of Acceptance issued in Australian Application No. 2020283140 dated Mar. 30, 2022, 4 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance issued in Canadian Application No. 3,140,008 dated May 5, 2022, 1 pg. |
Office Action issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2020283140, dated Mar. 18, 2022, 5 pgs. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/543,200, dated Mar. 9, 2022, 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,461, dated Mar. 10, 2022, 18 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,872, dated Mar. 17, 2022, 21 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/566,020, dated Mar. 18, 2022, 20 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/541,036, dated Mar. 31, 2022, 22 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/543,152, dated Apr. 19, 2022, 17 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,814, dated Apr. 25, 2022, 21 pages. |
Vermeersch, “Influence of substrate thickness on thermal impedance of microelectronic structures”, Microelectronics Reliability, 47, 2007, pp. 437-443. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,462, dated May 27, 2022, 28 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,461, dated Jun. 27, 2022, 13 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/566,020, dated Jul. 12, 2022, 20 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/543,200, dated Jul. 20, 2022, 25 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/746,622, dated Jul. 22, 2022, 19 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/541,036, dated Aug. 9, 2022, 22 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/746,640, dated Aug. 18, 2022, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,872, dated Jul. 11, 2022, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/543,152, dated Jul. 29, 2022, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/540,021, filed Dec. 1, 2021, Heim et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/541,036, filed Dec. 2, 2021, Heim et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/543,152, filed Dec. 6, 2021, Bivolarsky et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,814, filed Dec. 6, 2021, Burcham et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,461, filed Dec. 5, 2021, Burcham et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,872, filed Dec. 6, 2021, Bivolarsky et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/543,200, filed Dec. 6, 2021, Bivolarsky et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,462, filed Dec. 5, 2021, Bivolarsky et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/566,020, filed Dec. 30, 2021, Bivolarsky et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/746,622, filed May 17, 2022, Bivolarsky et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/746,640, filed May 17, 2022, Bivolarsky et al. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/542,814, dated Aug. 26, 2022. 22 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/540,021, dated Sep. 15, 2022, 40 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/543,200, dated Nov. 3, 2022, 16 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220178880 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63122336 | Dec 2020 | US | |
63121720 | Dec 2020 | US |