Traditional chemical-based propulsion systems may be used to launch and maneuver space vehicles. However, such chemical-based propulsion systems are inherently limited by the amount of chemicals, or fuel, that is transported into space along with the vehicle. At some point during the operating life of the space vehicle, the fuel will become depleted and will thus render the space vehicle unusable.
Electric-based propulsion systems have been developed to address, in part, the limitations inherent in chemical-based propulsion systems. However, such electric-based propulsion systems have their own unique limitations. For example, a plasma-based electrostatic or electromagnetic propulsion system, such as a Hall Effect or an ion engine, must have a sufficient amount of rare and expensive high-molecular weight gas. Further, the maximum amount of electrical power that can be generated and/or stored onboard the space vehicle limits the amount of thrust that can be produced by such electric-based propulsion systems.
Accordingly, there is a need in the arts to provide a more efficient and effective propulsion system for space vehicles.
Systems and methods of establishing and using plasma in a rotating magnetic field are disclosed. An exemplary embodiment is a plasma thruster method that establishes a first transverse magnetic field with respect to a system axis of a plasma propulsion system; establishes a second transverse magnetic field oriented orthogonally to the first transverse magnetic field, wherein the second transverse magnetic field is out of phase with the first transverse magnetic field; and establishes a magnetic field aligned with the system axis using a plurality of magnet elements oriented along the system axis. A plasma containment portion defines an interior region, wherein an interior region of a plasma containment portion accommodates a plasma that is established by a rotating magnetic field component that is cooperatively established by the first transverse magnetic field and the second transverse magnetic field, and wherein the plasma is accelerated out of the plasma containment portion by magnetic forces to generate a propulsion force.
Preferred and alternative embodiments are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
In an example embodiment, the electrically conducting bands 110 may be configured as a plurality of flux conserving rings or the like. Alternatively, or additionally, the magnet elements 114 may be configured as solenoid coils or the like. In some embodiments, a thin passive magnetic flux expander/radiator may be located downstream of the plasma containment portion 118 or near the end of the plasma containment portion 118. Alternative embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 may contain fewer elements than shown in
The embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100, interchangeably referred to as an Electrodeless Lorentz Force (ELF) thruster, create from a high-density propellant, a magnetized plasma 120 [interchangeably referred to as a Field Reversed Configuration (FRC)] within the plasma containment portion 118. The magnetized plasma 120 is established using a rotating magnetic field (RMF). The rotating magnetic field creates the high-density magnetized plasma 120 utilizing an electrodeless Rotating Magnetic Field (RMF) formation. The RMF field produces an azimuthal current in the plasma, and when coupled with a magnetic field gradient, results in a Jθ×Br force that accelerates the magnetized plasma 120 propellant to high velocity. The rotating magnetic field is transverse to the thruster system (a longitudinal axis a122 of symmetry in the r-θ plane). By utilizing pulsed, high-density plasma formation within a magnetic field, embodiments efficiently ionize and eject the magnetized plasma 120.
The synchronous motion of the electrons magnetized in this magnetic field produce a large azimuthal current, that when driven in a direction opposite to that flowing in the external solenoid, reduces and eventually reverses the magnetic field inside the magnetized plasma 120, thereby forming a closed magnetic field configuration separate from the external thruster fields (the FRC). These large FRC plasma currents together with the greatly increased radial magnetic field created by the presence of the plasmoid result in a very substantial Jθ×Br force that rapidly accelerates the FRC propellant 120 out of the exhaust portion 116 of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100.
The rotating magnetic field thruster 100 is electrodeless so that the magnetized plasma 120 is magnetically isolated. Accordingly, thermal and chemical wall interactions are negligible. Since the magnetized plasma 120 is magnetically confined, high-temperature energetic particles remain isolated from the thruster walls, considerably increasing lifetime of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 and minimizing wall conduction losses. This isolation of the magnetized plasma 120 also allows for efficient operation at high specific impulse, and allows operation with chemically reactive gases that contain oxygen or complex molecules such as monopropellants, in-situ resources, and/or ambient resources.
Embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 provide a pulsed and highly efficient ionization source that is variable over a vast range of power, thrust, and Isp levels. The propellant 120 is completely isolated from the driving field so no complex magnetic detachment is required. A large azimuthal current (up to 20 kA) is generated with a radio frequency (RF) wave in the form of a steady transverse rotating magnetic field. The large azimuthal current is driven by rotating magnetic fields, rather than induced currents. The RF frequency is typically well under 1 MHz so that voltage and switching requirements can be met by modern solid-state switching. The axial forces are primarily driven by the driven Jθ and applied Br rather than thermal forces, thereby maximizing thrust efficiency.
Legacy electric-based propulsion (EP) systems have a dominant physical limitation. The primary energy loss mechanism for all fundamental electrostatic and electromagnetic propulsion devices and technologies is ionization loss. In realized EP systems, 100-500 eV/per atom is lost in the ionization process alone, not including kinetic energy transfer. All plasma-based electrostatic and electromagnetic propulsion systems require an ionized particle to be able to accelerate propellant. The tremendous ionization energy cost leads to several system-level tradeoffs that severely limit the operational range of electric propulsion devices. These legacy EP systems must operate with high molecular weight gasses and, as a result, high voltages and specific impulses are required to offset the energy debt incurred in the ionization process. Therefore, a thrust-to-power (T/P, optionally defined in mN/kW) and specific power [optionally defined in kW/kg] are fundamentally limited by the physics of the legacy EP device. There are two solutions for this problem provided by embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100: high-efficiency ionization and the acceleration of neutral (non-ionized) particles.
The rotating magnetic field thruster 100 has the capability to address the demanding combined requirements of high specific power, high efficiency, a large Isp range, and required T/P. Based on the current laboratory results, an exemplary embodiment of a rotating magnetic field thruster 100 would enable a range of high-power propulsion missions in the 10-100 kW class. This example rotating magnetic field thruster 100 has successfully demonstrated expected heating and acceleration of magnetized plasma toroids at both high efficiency and high velocity.
The rotating magnetic field thruster 100 entrains neutral particles in a FRC and add momentum through lossless charge-exchange collisions. Via this neutral entrainment process, a high-density FRC is formed and accelerated without incurring the large ionization energy loss. This high-density FRC then interacts with a slow moving neutral population and, instead of ionizing more gas, charge exchange collisions occur, exchanging the charge of a particle but no momentum. When this exchange occurs in an acceleration field, a slow moving charged particle is accelerated, while a fast-moving neutral particle leaves the device unhindered. Fundamentally, neutral entrainment utilizes the physical fact that the charge-exchange collision frequency is much greater than the ionization frequency. In this manner two (or more) particles can be accelerated with only one ionizing collision and excitation, drastically reducing total system ionization loss. Neutral entrainment is applicable to all high-density plasma devices, including Pulsed Inductive Thrusters.
Embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 herald a new era of smaller, more efficient electric propulsion thrusters that could utilize cost-effective, readily available, propellants. In addition to radically improving performance of thrusters in traditional applications, embodiments using neutral entrainment would open the door to new high-power electric propulsion missions.
Embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 that employ RMF-formed FRC propulsion have much lower ionization costs, and operate at higher plasma and energy density (reduced size and mass). Embodiments provide an advanced acceleration technique in an FRC device, neutral entrainment, which has the potential to dramatically reduce overall ionization losses by creating high-velocity neutrals through charge exchange. Neutral Entrainment Enables: truly variable specific impulse 500-5000 s, theoretical efficiencies near 100%, correspondingly high T/P>200 mN/kW, vast power ranges 10 kW-10 MW, and operation on light-weight propellants (e.g.: Air, water, AF315, hydrazine, etc.).
The inductive field reversed configuration employed by the various embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 is now described. A field reversed plasma is simply a plasma that has large internal flowing currents. Those currents are large enough that they can generate magnetic fields that cancel out any applied magnetic field. This is effect can best be demonstrated in a planar geometry.
In Equation 1B is the magnitude of the magnetic field in the direction of the system axis, Eθ is the induced electric field in the azimuthal direction, η is the plasma bulk electrical resistivity, and jθ is the azimuthal current density in the plasma.
When the azimuthal current generates a magnetic field large enough to oppose the coil field, it is called “reversed.” This simply means that the applied field can no longer penetrate through the plasma magnetic field and into the plasma. It is important to note, that in this case there is a very strong magnetic pressure on the plasma current ring, from Jθ×Br. In a cylindrical geometry, the above plasma is described simply as the Field Reversed Configuration (FRC).
As conceptually illustrated in
In the various embodiments, when the internal fields balance the external fields, several very advantageous physical phenomena occur. First, the internal plasma 302, alternatively referred to as the FRC plasmoid, becomes completely detached from the external field. This allows the plasma 302 to either be worked on or translated by the coil 308 and limits any plasma interaction with the walls 310. Further, complex magnetic detachment of the magnetized propellant is not required. The non-limiting exemplary coil 308 is illustrated as having a theta-pinch portion 312, a coil current portion 314, and a separatrix portion 316. Other embodiments may have more than, or fewer than, the exemplary coil portions 312, 314, 316, and/or may use other nomenclature to identify the various portions of the coil 308.
Embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 allow for a magnetic pressure balance to occur, where the magnetized radial plasma pressure balances the external applied magnetic field, as described in Equation 2, where Bext is the axial magnetic field external to the FRC radially, n is the plasma density, k is the Boltzmann constant, μ0 is the free space permeability constant, and T is the total plasma temperature.
During operation, embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 realize an additional unexpected significant advantage. As illustrated in the idealized magnetic fields in
Embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 facilitate stability, radial, and axial pressure balances that become key parameters to design an FRC system. For propulsion applications, design parameters may be based on the last stage of the FRC formation process, referred to herein as translation. In a highly-compressed configuration, a FRC will begin to translate out of the discharge portion of coil 308 with a small non-uniform field or neutral density. This is typically accomplished with a small conical angle to the discharge portion of coil 308 providing a small J×B force on the plasma 302. However, as the FRC begins to leave the discharge portion of coil 308, it is acted upon by a strong magnetic pressure gradient that drives the FRC axially. This force is given in Equations 3 and 4, where md is the magnetic moment of the plasma body.
F=Ma=∇(md·B) 3)
Propulsion application and issues of the various embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 are now described in greater detail. First, the nature of a high-density, magnetized discharge lends itself to higher thrust, power, and plasma densities resulting in smaller thruster footprints and possibly smaller dry mass than a comparable-power electrostatic device. The inductive nature of the discharge provides an electrodeless environment that does not require neutralizer or life-limiting cathode and anode surfaces. Unlike legacy EP pulsed electromagnetic devices, the FRC generated by embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 do not have plasma attached to the spacecraft (through coil field lines), and will have minimal divergence and spacecraft interaction issues. The pulsed and high electron temperature nature of the discharges immediately enables lower ionization losses due to excitation and recombination reactions. Also, the isolation of a compressed flux boundary limits wall-transport/interaction, decreasing ionization losses and enabling operation on complex and chemically-reactive propellants.
There are, however, a few concerns with plasma discharge in legacy EP systems (that are resolved by various embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100). First, a pulsed-inductive discharge of this nature requires very high voltages (on the order of 10's kV) in order to provide suitable breakdown and current drive in a large inductive load, possibly dramatically increasing dry mass in a power processing unit (PPU) and stored energy network. Secondly, the main acceleration mechanisms are driven by high particle pressure, with necessitation of high plasma temperature. And while a majority of those frozen flow losses will be recovered post ejection, the design and optimization of a system driver may be difficult, if not impossible. Finally, during fast FRC formation, a high-density sheath (possibly an order of magnitude greater than background density) forms at the separatrix. A high-mass propellant will increase radiative losses during formation, again adding complexity to the formation. Embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 employ a Rotating Magnetic Field (RMF) FRC propulsion formation scheme that has the same benefits of the inductive discharge, but with lower voltage and plasma density during formation.
Jθ=eneωr a)
The large Jθ may be driven in a conical field with a radial magnetic field in a thruster system. The fully-reversed magnetized plasma 120 is then accelerated axially by the resultant Jθ×Br force. If the RMF antenna is also extended in the conical section, the azimuthal current continues to be generated as the magnetized plasma 120 moves downstream and the magnetized plasma 120 accelerates throughout the entire cone. Finally, as the magnetized plasma 120 expands through the conical section and beyond the exit of the cone the thermal energy of the magnetized plasma 120 is converted into axial velocity.
The magnetized plasma 120 formation is now described in greater detail. Magnetized plasma 120 formation utilizes a more advanced formation scheme to ionize and reverse a propellant. In an exemplary embodiment, the illustrated two Helmholtz-pair magnetic field coils 504, 506 form the antennas. Current in each antenna 504, 506 is varied sinusoidally to produce a transverse magnetic field 408 which rotates in the r-O plane, and which may be characterized in the form of Equation 7.
BRMF=Bωcos(ωt)êr+Bωsin(ωt)êθ 7)
This creates a composite magnetic field 502 that appears to be rotating perpendicular to the axis, as illustrated in
When an electron is magnetized, the magnetized electron is rotated with the field and forms a rotating Jθ current. The frequency of rotation is between the ion and electron cyclotron frequencies, Ωi<ω<Ωe. Thus the electrons can be thought of as tied to the RMF field, and having the effect of driving the electrons in the direction of the RMF rotation while leaving the ions unaffected. As this electron rotates, it ionizes other particles creating a bulk, high energy current that is rotating azimuthally along the system axis 122.
As this magnetized plasma 120 drags bulk electrons azimuthally, a large current (on the order of tens of kA) is formed near the quartz boundary. If the generated current is more than the applied bias, a fully reversed configuration is formed. This then has a similar geometry to the inductively formed FRC described above, although it was not created with large pulsed currents, but rather RF oscillating currents and is dominated by the Hall term.
Jθ=eneωr 9)
Depending upon the embodiment and operation thereof, Jθ can be many times the magnitude of oscillating current.
In the various embodiments, three significant requirements are met with a fully reversed magnetized plasma 120. First, the induced Hall term, J×B/ne, must be sufficient to fully reverse the applied bias field. Second, RMF must penetrate the plasma, which sets an upper limit on plasma density, typically ˜1019 m−3. And third, the electrons must be magnetized and free to rotate, but the ions must remain fixed (ωce>vei).
An exemplary plasmoid formation may proceed as follows. a) A set of solenoidal windings create an axial bias magnetic field inside array of isolated conducting bands which preserve magnetic flux but permit transverse fields from RF antennas. Neutral gas fills chamber. b) An RF antenna produces oscillating transverse m=1 mode where electrons couple to the component rotating in the electron drift direction. A high density plasma of moderate pressure peaked on axis is produced. c) Newly created plasma electrons are strongly magnetized to RF field, and with the continuously increasing plasma density result in an ever larger synchronous electron motion (azimuthal current). Ohmic power flow dramatically increases plasma energy density (pressure). The high β plasma (diamagnetic) current opposes the initial axial magnetic flux. The flux conserving bands prohibit the initial coil flux from escaping thereby causing a large increase in the magnetic field external to the plasma as this field is compressed between the plasma and metal bands. (Lenz's law dictates that the plasma current be mirrored in the flux conserving bands thus enhancing the magnetic field even more). d) The magnitude of synchronous electron motion (i.e. current) driven by the rotating magnetic field reduces the magnitude of the axial magnetic field progressively inward radially toward the system axis. When sufficient synchronous current is attained, a point is reached where the axial magnetic field direction is reversed on the system axis to the field external to the plasma. At this point in time the plasma becomes wholly confined by the magnetic field produced by these plasma currents, and magnetically isolated from the magnetic field produced by the currents in the external coils and flux conserving bands. The result is a well confined, closed field plasmoid (FRC) in equilibrium with an external field now many times larger than the initial bias field, and a stable, fully formed magnetized plasma persists in the discharge region for as long as the RMF is maintained.
At startup, the RMF is applied along the axial region. In an exemplary embodiment, bias field windings, such as solenoidal windings, create an axial bias field Bb inside array of isolated electrically conducting rings or bands. The process enters a helicon mode wherein the RF antenna produces oscillating transverse m=1 mode where electrons couple to the component rotating in the electron drift direction. A high density plasma of moderate pressure peaked on axis is produced. As conceptually illustrated in
Accordingly, the plasmoid 704a is then accelerated along the length of the discharge cone 702 due to direct acceleration. The plasmoid 704b is conceptually illustrated as increasing as it moves through the discharge cone 702 (in a direct Jθ ×Bt acceleration formation stage 708 of the discharge cone 702). At the exit 710, or exhaust, of the discharge cone 702 the plasmoid 704b is free to expand against the end magnetic field and both cools and further accelerates towards the end 706 of the discharge cone 702. The relatively larger plasmoid 704c exits the discharge cone 702 (in the illustrated magnetic expansion/acceleration stage 712). In reality, the operation of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 is significantly more complicated, as the plasmoid both forms and accelerates during the entire length of the discharge cone 702.
In some embodiments, each capacitor-switch pair may drive an individual Litz wire bundle of 200, 36-AWG, insulated wires that are operated in parallel to form a single, high Q LC oscillator for RMF generation. Exemplary circuit parameters are shown in
An important parameter for the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 is the thrust efficiency, which may be examined with an analysis of energy losses. For the ELF discharges, energy loss and deposition into kinetic energy can be determined. The analysis presented below assumes fully ionized, magnetized plasma which has a typical RMF density distribution and high-β configuration. A simple average radius, rs is used for plasma volume to simplify the equations below.
In the RMF acceleration stage 706 (
fz=jθ×Br 9)
EK=∫0l
jθ=eneωr 11)
Iθ=∫∫∫jθdrdθdl 12)
rplasma≈rseparatrix 13)
Iθ≈πrs3laeneω 14)
Br=Bbias sin(θ) 15)
The total kinetic energy of the FRC is then the integral of the applied axial force over the length of the cone. It is important to note that the FRC remains highly coupled during this entire discharge (high magnetic pressure) and an average radius for the extent of the plasma is given by rs, the separatrix radius. Equation 17 shows the total kinetic energy imparted by the RMF.
Fz=πrs3laeneωBbias sin(θ) 16)
EK_RMF≈Bbiasneeωπrs3la2 sin(θ) 17)
The kinetic energy imparted by the magnetic expansion section can be given by the following analysis. Equation 18 describes the energy imparted on an FRC that is balanced by magnetic pressure between two states, a high-temperature, high magnetic field, and a low temperature, low magnetic field regime. Clearly this approximation tends to break down at very low temperature (or zero field), but during the expansion process it is typically found that an FRC will shed a majority of its thermal energy moving into a low field region. η is given as the conversion efficiency (Equation 20). The magnetic pressure balance is given in Equation 20.
Finally, using the separatrix radius at the exit of the cone (in this case taken as the average radius) gives the total kinetic energy imparted on the FRC on its exit, for various conversion efficiencies, ηe.
Ionization losses in an RMF FRC are a complicated measurement and one that must be done for a complete thruster analysis. For this estimation, the ionization losses that have been measured in other, steady-state RMF experiments will be used. It is expected that the ELF will have lower ionization losses than other EP devices, due to the more transient nature of its discharge as described later. This ionization loss energy is the full energy required to get a neutral particle to the exit of the thruster and includes radiation, excitation, recombination, electron bombardment ionization, and wall energy losses. Therefore, given a per-ion ionization loss of 40 eV/ion, ionization losses are simply, as shown in Equation 22.
Mbit is the total propellant mass in the FRC and M0 is the atomic mass of the propellant. Ohmic coil losses are taken to be the resistive losses in the capacitors (ESR), discharge coil (RCoil), and transmission lines (Rcircuit) over the discharge length. Bias capacitor bank and pre-ionization circuit are simply the energy utilized in the bias and pre-ionization discharge circuits during the discharge.
EΩ=Δτ(ESR+RCoil+RCircuit)IRMS2 23)
Using representative numbers from a 50 J ELF discharge, with a separatrix radius ˜0.8r and measured density and mass bits, Table 1 can be compiled. The operating conditions for embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 will be highly efficient.
With respect to ionization losses, embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 accelerate charged particles by the application of electrostatic and electrodynamic (magnetic) forces. In order to accelerate a propellant, the propellant must be charged. In legacy EP systems, the propellant must undergo an ionizing collision event. Embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 employ a novel system to propel the propellant.
Additionally, in a non-magnetized plasma the particles are free to collide with the wall thereby removing even more energy from the system. To directly compare with a Hall thruster, Xenon has an ionization potential of 12 V/ion and operates with an electron temperature of 1-5 eV. The total collision cross section data is expected that, at those electron temperatures, the minimum ionization energy (ignoring wall losses) is >100 eV/ion, based on the data in
For propulsion, the thruster efficiency can be summed as the kinetic energy divided by the total energy spent (or power in a given unit of time). Equation 24 shows the efficiency η as a function of propellant velocity, plasma temperature, and ionization energy.
In accordance with equation 24, a maximum theoretical efficiency and thrust to power can be calculated for various thruster configurations.
Various embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 employ neutral entrainment (NE). The fundamental concept in NE is that an FRC will ingest large quantities of neutral gas through charge exchange collisions, not ionization. If you accelerate an FRC while providing upstream neutral gas, Isp can be specified and mass/thrust added with very high efficiency. That is, accelerating an FRC into and through a large neutral gas population was beneficial to the FRC process. The plasma both gained mass and became more stable. Additionally, it is believed that only a fraction of the neutrals were ionized in the process, but most were swept up as the FRC passed. Accordingly, embodiments of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 employ this discovery and apply it to a thruster environment for a space vehicle propulsion system.
Neutral entrainment may be conceptually described as follows. A collisional, ionized propellant is accelerated in a gradient magnetic field, as in Equation 9. In this specific case, it will be in the form of a closed field, isolated FRC that is translating in a constant bias magnetic field. A slow, cold neutral gas population is introduced in front of the translating plasma. As the plasma ions collide with the neutral particles a positive ion will collide with an atom so as to capture a valence electron, resulting in a transfer of the electron from the atom to the ion. If this occurs between populations with the same mass, then the charge transfer occurs with no change in momentum. Additionally, kinetic energy is completely conserved. Equation 25 explains the neutral entrainment concept, where P is a propellant atom.
P+(Fast)+P(Slow)→P(Fast)+P+(Slow) 25)
Also, the collisional cross section for charge exchange is given as Equation 26, where va is the relative velocity and εion is the ionization potential.
After collision, the resulting fast moving neutral particle proceeds out of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100 unhindered by magnetic fields and simply adds momentum. Meanwhile, the slow-moving charged particle is still confined in an accelerating/gradient magnetic field, and is subsequently accelerated to high velocity and applying a thrust force to the spacecraft (via the magnetic field coils). In total there are two fast moving propellant particles, but only one ionization loss, thereby effectively reducing the total ionization loss per particle in half. Depending on the collision frequency, velocity, and density of the plasma and neutral populations of the propellant, this neutral entrainment process will be repeated throughout an FRC and possibly several times as shown in
The key parameter in neutral entrainment is the ratio of ionization to charge exchange collision cross section.
There are several key factors which are considered in order to optimize the entrainment of neutral particles in an accelerating field. The first factor is a high collision rate of propellant particles. In order to collide and entrain a neutral particle, the mean free path must be significantly less than the interaction region. This requires that there be sufficient plasma density as well as neutral density. A generalized ion-neutral mean free path is described in Equation 27, which shows the dependencies which will dominate an ion-neutral collision rate that is typically empirically obtained. V is velocity, Z is charge state, Ti is ion temperature, u is atomic mass ratio, and ni is ion density.
λIon-n=V/vi-n∝VZ−2μ1/2ni−1/2n−1/2Ti3/4[m] 27)
For this application density in accordance with Equation 27, ni and n must be large in order to interact on the scale of a rotating magnetic field thruster 100. Additionally, cold ions will be advantageous.
A second factor is a long acceleration region within the rotating magnetic field thruster 100. Equation 28 shows the requirements for accelerator length. Additional collision would be beneficial in allowing multiple neutral entrainment interactions.
LA>λIon-n 28)
A third factor is the cross section of and interaction temperature within the rotating magnetic field thruster 100. Interaction temperature should be such that the charge-exchange collision cross section is larger than the ionization cross section, as shown in Equation 29. Equation 29 is applicable for the plasmas of interest.
σcharge_exchange>>σionization 30)
A fourth factor are body forces and a quasi-neutral plasma. The acceleration mechanism is preferably such that there is no interaction with the collision rates and plasma density. Additionally, the plasma must be quasineutral. These two factors lead directly to body forces and an electrodeless operation. If there are large internal plasma sheaths, neutral entrainment may be compromised. Further, the ability to choose a propellant based on collision cross sections (and use molecular propellants) would add significant propulsive and performance benefits in some embodiments.
While most inductive and high density propulsion devices can be applicable to neutral entrainment, FRC plasmas substantially satisfy these factors. Additionally, an FRC can be formed and translated into a region of only neutrals and accelerating field, creating an optimal geometry for translation.
A detailed testing, characterization, and initial optimization of an exemplary rotating magnetic field thruster 100 has been completed. Investigations have been performed on Nitrogen, Air, Oxygen, and Xenon at numerous operating pressure and timings. Plasma discharges have been tested at 250 to 1000 V. Bias fields have been varied between 0 and 500 Gauss and the downstream drift tube has been operated from 0 to 200 Gauss. Discharge energies have varied from 10-70 Joules per pulse. Investigations in bias field shaping, FRC formation, and downstream translation/expansion have all been performed. Finally, a preliminary experimental performance study was done to investigate thrust impulse, specific impulse, and discharge energy utilization for Nitrogen discharges. The tested rotating magnetic field thruster 100 demonstrated non-inductive formation, acceleration, and ejection of a FRC plasmoid with a measurable thrust.
In an exemplary embodiment, axial magnetic field loops are arrayed externally along the discharge cone to measure the diamagnetic current drive in the cone. These measurements give an indication of the location of the separatrix and the amount of compression being done on the plasma. A compression ratio of 2 (Bexternal/Binitial bias) is typical of a well-formed RMF FRC.
Downstream magnetic field probes and Langmuir probes may be used to fully characterize the translating FRC. Time-of-flight measurements were done using the peak Langmuir probe data to extrapolate translation velocity. In an exemplary embodiment of the rotating magnetic field thruster 100, double Langmuir probes are utilized at two locations, Z=50 and 90 cm. By comparing the time arrival of plasma at 0 cm radius, an average velocity, peak plasma density, and peak impulse can be obtained.
Radial scans of magnetic field and plasma density in an operating embodiment of a rotating magnetic field thruster 100 have been conducted. The key diagnostics in FRC propulsion are the downstream characterizations of the translating plasma. Radial profiles of plasma density and magnetic field uniquely show that, indeed, the downstream plasma is a reversed-field configuration plasma. By examining the radial profile at various axial locations a full characterization of the expansion and inner structure of the ejected plasmoid can be obtained.
Additionally, and as indicated by Equation 17 above, when neutral density is high, the kinetic energy addition to the plasma is linear. As expected, impulse remains high, but velocity drops as V∝√{square root over (n)} with increasing content. In the middle region there is sufficient plasma to drive large azimuthal currents, but additionally energy can be spent efficiently accelerating plasma to high velocities. FRCs formed in this region tend to also have much larger diamagnetic currents, high pressure, temperature, and velocity. Therefore, it is believed that FRC performance characteristics can be highly variable with only minor variations in neutral gas distribution and puff timing, but are relatively insensitive to changes in propellant type, magnetic geometry, etc.
Table 2 provides peak performance summary results for nitrogen, air, and for xenon, from a tested rotating magnetic field thruster 100. Velocity is measured with Langmuir and magnetic time-of-flight downstream. Error bars are large, +/−25% from average numbers shown above. Impulse measurements are from a ballistic pendulum, and are expected to be +/−10% from various calibrations performed. Energy usage estimates are taken from both measured capacitor energy and a detailed electrical circuit calculation using SPICE (Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis) with an uncertainty <+/−5%.
As noted above, a novel ballistic pendulum was devised to measure thrust force of an magnetized plasma 120 exiting from the rotating magnetic field thruster 100. A ballistic pendulum setup consists of a stand, an optical displacement sensor, and the pendulum itself. The stand is a base and post with a metal plate on which the ballistic pendulum oscillates. A smaller second post is located just behind the ballistic pendulum and holds the eye of an optical displacement sensor in-place with a set screw. The optical displacement sensor may be powered with 12 VDC source to provide a linear, analog displacement signal. The ballistic pendulum face consists of a rigid nylon mesh covered with a quartz fiber paper. The purpose of the ballistic pendulum is to absorb the momentum of the magnetized plasma 120 and disperse the incident gas and any evaporated material uniformly in all directions. The paper and screen of the ballistic pendulum are attached to the pivot arm with flexible epoxy to reduce delamination. On the back of the screen a small reflective mirror is attached to provide the eye of the displacement sensor with an appropriate surface to detect. Top of the pivot arm is a block of metal attached via set screw (for height adjustment) and dual pivot point for stability.
The ballistic pendulum is covered with a woven quartz fiber paper that is key to the operation. A typical ballistic pendulum is designed to trap in incoming mass/particle that is incident. However, this is very difficult to do with a high-temperature, low-density plasma. The quartz filter acts to diffusively passivate and dissipate the incoming FRC. It consists of pure, woven, 400 μm quartz fiber filter that is designed to withstand 1100 degrees C. steady state with little sputtering or ablation. By neutralizing and deflecting the directed momentum of the gas diffusively, the collision can be considered inelastic with only axially transferred momentum.
The ballistic pendulum is calibrated in two ways. First, a simple steady-state calibration system is able to calibrate the pendulum in-situ between design and chamber-setup changes. The steady-state calibration is critical to maintaining the calibration of the optical sensor and the effective ballistic pendulum mass and lengths. However, a full impulse-calibration should also be completed in order to fully characterize the temporal response of the ballistic pendulum and verify that the expected inelastic response of the ballistic pendulum is maintained for various gas temperatures and velocities.
With the ability to form and sustain an FRC in gases such as Xenon creates the possibility of using the RMF produced FRC plasma as a source of EUV radiation. Xenon FRC plasmas have been generated at 1020 m−3 peak densities at a plasma radius of 10 cm. To obtain sufficient radiant intensity, as well as the appropriate etendue for EUV lithography, the FRC plasmoid is compressed to a much smaller volume. This has been accomplished by forming the RMF FRC inside a set of coils as in the ELF thruster and compressing the FRC with the axial magnetic field coils outside the formation region as illustrated in
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the tested rotating magnetic field thruster 100 are merely possible examples of implementations of the invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application is a Continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/206,381, filed Aug. 9, 2011, and entitled “APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING PLASMA AND USING PLASMA IN A ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELD,” which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. utility application entitled “Rotating Magnetic Field Thruster”, having application Ser. No. 61/372,001, filed Aug. 9, 2010, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3113427 | Meyer | Dec 1963 | A |
3128595 | Meyer | Apr 1964 | A |
3935503 | Ress | Jan 1976 | A |
20100192538 | Boren | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
738511 | Oct 1955 | GB |
2011034466 | Mar 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Slough “Magnetically Accelerated Plasmoid (MAP) Thruster—Initial Results and Future Plans” (Year: 2007). |
Slough “Magnetically Accelerated Plasmoid (MAP) Propulsion”, Jul. 2006, 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2006-4654 |
Slough, “Multi-Megawatt Propulsion Based on a Compact Toroid Thruster”, 2005, 29th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Princeton University. http://erps.spacegrant.org/uploads/images/images/iepc_articledownload_1988-2007/2005index/296.pdf. |
Slough “Magnetically Accelerated Plasmoid (MAP) Thruster—Initial Results and Future Plans” Presented at the 30th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Florence, Italy Sep. 17-20, 2007, http://www.researchgate.net/publication/237702417_Magnetically_Accelerated_Plasmoid_(MAP)_Thruster_Initial_Results_and_Future_Plans. |
Slough et al, “Pulsed Plasmoid Propulsion: The ELF Thruster”, Proceedings of the 31st International Electronic Propulsion Conference, IEPC-2009-265, Sep. 20-24, 2009, pp. 1-24, XP008147097, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. |
Brown et al, “Air Force Research Laboratory High Power Electronic Propulsion Technology Development”, Aerospace Conference 2010 IEEE, Mar. 6, 2010, pp. 1-9, XP031657401, Piscataway , New Jersey, USA. |
Fukuda et al, “A Compact Disk Type Plasma Propulsion System with Modulated Magnetic Field for Nanoscale Space Vehicles”, American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, Jan. 1, 2008, pp. 923-928, XP55015870, DOI: 10.1063/1.3076609. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160115946 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61372001 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13206381 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 14867997 | US |