This application may be related to the following United States non-provisional patent applications assigned to the assignee of the present application which are all incorporated by reference herein: Ser. No. 12/817,754, filed Jun. 17, 2010, now Pat. No. 8,769,992, issued Jul. 8, 2014; Ser. No. 13/267,990, now Pat. No. 8,997,525, issued Apr. 7, 2015, Ser. No. 13/268,028, now Pat. No. 8,875,544, issued Nov. 4, 2014, Ser. No. 13/268,098, now Pat. No. 8,707,740, issued Apr. 29, 2014, and Ser. No. 13/268,130, now Pat. No. 9,021,838, issued May 5, 2015, all four filed Oct. 7, 2011; Ser. No. 13/458,211, filed Apr. 27, 2012, now Pat. No. 9,145,319, issued Sep. 29, 2015; Ser. No. 13/493,170, now Pat. No. 8,707,739, issued Apr. 29, 2014and Ser. No. 13/493,219, now Pat. No. 9,096,453, issued Aug. 4, 2015, both filed Jun. 11, 2012; Ser. No. 13/540,771, filed Jul. 3, 2012, now Pat. No. 9,032,760, issued May 19, 2015; Ser. Nos. 13/644,058; 13/644,104, now Pat. No. 9,096,452, issued Aug. 4, 2015; Ser. Nos. 13/633,979; 13/633,998, now Pat. No. 8,973,405, issued Mar. 10, 2015; and Ser. No. 13/644,039, now Pat. No. 8,991,215, issued Mar. 31, 2015, all five filed Oct. 3, 2012; Ser. No. 13/752,672, filed Jan. 29, 2013, now Pat. No. 9,115,017, issued Aug. 25, 2015; and Ser. No. 13/689,318, filed Nov. 29, 2013 now Pat. No. 9,227,865, issued Jan. 5, 2016.
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates generally to the field of melting glass-forming materials using a melter, and methods of use thereof to produce molten glass, and more specifically to methods and systems for making well-fined molten glass, and glass products therefrom, using one or more melters, for example submerged combustion melters.
Background Art
A submerged combustion melter (SCM) may be employed to melt glass batch and/or waste glass materials to produce molten glass by passing oxygen, oxygen-enriched mixtures, or air along with a liquid, gaseous and/or particulate fuel (some of which may be in the glass-forming materials), directly into a molten pool of glass, usually through burners submerged in a glass melt pool. The introduction of high flow rates of products of combustion of the oxidant and fuel into the molten glass, and the expansion of the gases cause rapid melting of the glass batch and much turbulence and foaming.
Molten glass produced from an SCM is generally a homogeneous mixture of molten glass and fine bubbles. The bubbles may occupy up to 40 percent or more of the volume of molten glass produced with fine bubbles distributed throughout the molten mass of glass. For glass forming operations requiring well-fined (essentially void free) molten glass, a very large number of bubbles must be removed from the molten glass. The typical procedure for removing the bubbles is to allow a long enough residence time in one or more apparatus downstream of the SCM for the bubbles to rise to the surface and burst. Clearing bubbles from the molten glass is referred to as “fining” within the glass industry. Experience with SCMs has shown that the fining process can be very slow due to the bubbles collecting at the molten glass surface forming a layer of stable foam thereon. Formation of this foam layer in downstream fining chambers retards the fining mechanism as well as the heat penetration into the glass from fining chamber combustion burners firing above the glass.
Use of skimmers within the foam layer has been used to hold back some of the upper foam layers allowing the lower, less foamy layers to pass through to flow channels downstream of the SCM. These efforts have been somewhat effective but may require multiple skimmers to obtain a foam free glass layer and surface. In addition, the skimmers are prone to failure during operation making them no longer useful in holding back the upper foam layers and can fall into and partially block downstream flow channels, impeding some or all of the glass flow to downstream apparatus such as forming stations. It is also conventional to use a submerged throat positioned between a melter and a downstream channel, or between first and second sections of a melter; however, these throats are used primarily to serve as a demarcation between an upstream melting region and a downstream fining region. Other methods use a flat-bottom refining or conditioning channel downstream of the melter. In some cases the flat-bottom refining or conditioning channel is movable into and out of fluid communication with the effluent of the melter therefrom, therefore decoupling the melter and downstream glass forming apparatus. However, such arrangements require long refiners and long residence times to sufficiently remove entrained bubbles.
At least for these reasons, it would be an advance in the glass manufacturing art to solve one or more problems of bubble removal and/or surface foam buildup, preferably both problems, while increasing operational flexibility during processing molten glass having a high concentration of gas bubbles such as produced by submerged combustion melting, thereby allowing formation of well-fined molten glass, and glass products using the well-fined molten glass.
In accordance with the present disclosure, apparatus, systems and methods are described for reducing or eliminating glass foam and/or entrained bubbles produced during melting of glass-forming materials, in particular in a submerged combustion melter.
A first aspect of the disclosure is a method comprising:
A second aspect of the disclosure is an apparatus comprising:
A third aspect of the disclosure is a system comprising:
The raised curb helps spread or distribute the molten glass across containing bubbles across the width of the primary fining chamber and minimize flow concentrating down the center (minimize channeling). Apparatus, systems and methods of this disclosure may accept a molten mass of glass having bubbles therein formed from any melting apparatus or system, including submerged combustion melters (SCMs) and conventional (non-submerged combustion and/or electrically heated) laminar flow glass tank furnaces. An SCM melts glass-forming materials to produce a turbulent molten mass of foamed glass, the SCM comprising a roof, a floor, a sidewall structure connecting the roof and floor, and an outlet for the molten mass of foamed glass in the floor and/or the sidewall structure. In other aspects, the present disclosure relates to methods of making glass products using a system either comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of at least one source of molten glass containing bubbles, and one or more fining chambers of the present disclosure. Optionally, apparatus, systems, and methods of this disclosure may include one or more foam layer impingement combustion burners, and/or one or more non-impingement heating combustion burners, and/or one or more Joulean heating elements in the molten mass of glass having bubbles therein, and/or in partially refined versions thereof. For example, one or more high momentum foam layer impingement combustion burners may be positioned immediately upstream of the raised curb, in either the roof or sidewall structure, or both, to burst at least some foamed material retained behind the raised curb and floating on top of the molten mass of glass by heat and/or direct impingement thereon, and one or more low momentum, non-impingement combustion burners may be positioned immediately downstream of the raised curb, in either the roof, the sidewall structure, or both, and positioned to transfer heat to the molten mass of glass.
Systems and methods of this disclosure will become more apparent upon review of the brief description of the drawings, the detailed description of the disclosure, and the claims that follow.
The manner in which the objectives of the disclosure and other desirable characteristics can be obtained is explained in the following description and attached drawings in which:
It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings of
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the disclosed apparatus, systems, and methods. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the apparatus, systems, and methods covered by the claims may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the specifically described embodiments may be possible and are deemed within the claims. All U.S. patent applications and U.S. patents referenced herein are hereby explicitly incorporated herein by reference. In the event definitions of terms in the referenced patents and applications conflict with how those terms are defined in the present application, the definitions for those terms that are provided in the present application shall be deemed controlling.
As explained briefly in the Background, bubbles may occupy up to 40 percent or more of the volume of the turbulent molten glass produced by an SCM, with fine bubbles distributed throughout the molten mass of glass. For glass forming operations requiring well-fined (essentially void free) molten glass, a very large number of bubbles must be removed from the molten glass. Experience with SCMs has shown that the fining process can be very slow due to the bubbles collecting at the molten glass surface forming a layer of stable foam thereon. Formation of this foam layer in downstream fining chambers retards the fining mechanism as well as the heat penetration into the glass from fining chamber heating systems, such as combustion burners firing above the glass and/or electrical joule heating below the glass. Use of skimmers within the foam layer to hold back some of the upper foam layers allowing the lower, less foamy layers to pass through to later sections of channels downstream of the SCM has been somewhat successful but suffers from several drawbacks.
It has been discovered that the use of a specially designed fining chamber downstream of the SCM (or other melting furnace or source of molten glass containing bubbles) may fully accomplish fining molten glass in a simple, effective way. The fining chamber includes an inlet transition region including a width that increases from an initial width to a final width, and depth that decreases from an initial depth to a final depth, followed by a raised curb, and finally to a flat constant depth primary fining region having an outlet in the floor at or near the distal end of the fining chamber. The depth of the primary fining region is greater than the raised curb, but less than the inlet transition region depth. The raised curb plays a very important role in distributing/spreading the glass and/or bubble flow across the width of the primary fining region of the fining chamber after the initial width increase experienced in the inlet transition region. In the absence of the raised curb, the molten glass flow would tend to flow down the centerline of the primary fining region and the additional width of the primary fining region would be wasted. Thus, one alternative to a constant height curb is to have it higher in the center than at the sides to force the molten glass to flow toward the sidewalls.
In accordance with apparatus, systems, and methods of the present disclosure, the fining chamber floor comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of a glass-contact refractory over one more refractory or brick layers. The fining chamber walls (and optional roof or ceiling) may also include glass-contact refractory. The roof or ceiling may include one or more adjustable roof-mounted high-momentum or low-momentum combustion burners (air/fuel, enriched oxygen/fuel, or combination thereof) such as described and illustrated in assignee's Ser. No. 13/493,219, filed Jun. 11, 2012, now Pat. No. 9,096,453, issued Aug. 4, 2015; Ser. No. 13/268,130, filed Oct. 7, 2011, now Pat. No. 9,021,838, issued May 5, 2015; and Ser. No. 3/493,170, filed Jun. 11, 2012, now Pat. No. 8,707,739, issued Apr. 29, 2014 for additional operational flexibility. High-momentum burners may be used as foam layer impingement burners, while low-momentum burners may be used for heating or maintaining temperature of the molten mass of glass having bubbles therein, or partially refined versions thereof. One or more electrical Joulean heating elements may be employed for heating purposes in the fining chamber (in any one or more locations), this technique being especially useful for high pull rate methods of the disclosure, where the electrical Joulean heating elements may enhance the fining of the molten mass of glass having bubbles therein.
In certain apparatus, systems, and methods of the present disclosure, one or more sections of the glass-contact refractory may include, or be replaced by one or more precious metals. For example, the raised curb may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of a glass-contact precious metal, or may be clad (lined) with a layer of such material. In certain other embodiments, the glass-contact refractory in the inlet transition region may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of a glass-contact precious metal, or may be clad (lined) with a layer of such material.
Certain methods of this disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of separating the second partially refined molten glass into an upper phase consisting essentially of glass foam and a lower phase consisting essentially of molten glass as the second partially refined molten glass flows toward an exit transition region of the fining chamber, the exit transition region having a width, a length, and a depth, wherein the width decreases from an initial width equal to the width of the primary fining region to a final width that is less than the initial width by a factor of 0.5 or less. Certain methods of this disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of routing the molten glass through and out of at least one passage in the exit transition region that is positioned lower than a phase boundary between the upper and lower phases in the exit transition region. Certain methods of this disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of temperature homogenizing the molten glass as it passes through at least one of the inlet transition region, the primary fining region, and the exit transition region. Certain methods of this disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of feeding at least a portion of the temperature homogenized molten glass to one or more glass forming stations. Certain methods of this disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of methods wherein the glass forming stations are selected from the group consisting of fiber forming spinnerets, fiberization stations, and non-glass fiber product forming stations. Certain methods of this disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the step of routing the molten mass of glass having bubbles therein to the inlet transition region of the fining chamber comprises flowing the molten mass of glass through at least one inlet aperture of the inlet transition region, wherein 100 percent of the inlet aperture is lower than a level of molten glass in the inlet transition region. Certain methods of this disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of controllably flowing at least some of the molten glass by gravity through at least one aperture in the floor of the exit transition region upon a planned or unplanned condition. Certain methods of this disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of cooling the sidewall structure using fluid-cooling of the sidewall structure sufficient to form a frozen glass layer on inside surfaces of the sidewall structure. Certain methods of this disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of cooling the molten glass as it passes through the at least one passage to a temperature just above a desired glass product forming temperature. Certain methods of the present disclosure may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of melting glass-forming materials to produce a turbulent molten mass of foamed glass in an SCM to produce the molten mass of glass having bubbles therein.
The length, width, height, and depth dimensions of the inlet transition region may vary widely, as may the width, length, and depth of the an exit transition region of the fining chamber. The exit transition region may have a width, a length, and a depth, wherein the width decreases from an initial width equal to the width of the primary fining region to a final width that is less than the initial width of the exit transition region by a factor of 0.5 or less.
Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of an exit transition region of the fining chamber, the exit transition region having a width, a length, and a depth, wherein the width decreases from an initial width equal to the width of the primary fining region to a final width that is less than the initial width of the exit transition region by a factor of 0.5 or less. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the exit transition region further comprises at least one passage for routing the molten glass through and out of the exit transition region, the at least one passage positioned lower than a phase boundary between the upper and lower phases in the exit transition region. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of a temperature homogenizing and/or momentum transferring elements selected from the group consisting of one or more roof-mounted burners and one or more electric coils mounted in at least one of the inlet transition region, the primary fining region, and the exit transition region.
Certain system embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of a submerged combustion melter fluidly connected to the fining chamber apparatus to produce the molten mass of glass having bubbles therein from glass-forming materials. Certain system embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of one or more glass forming stations fluidly connected to the exit transition region of the fining chamber. Certain system embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the glass forming stations are selected from the group consisting of fiber forming spinnerets, fiberization stations, and non-glass fiber product forming stations. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the inlet transition region comprises at least one inlet aperture for routing the molten mass of glass having bubbles therein to the inlet transition region, wherein 100 percent of the inlet aperture is positioned lower than a level of molten glass in the inlet transition region. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of at least one controllable aperture in the floor of the exit transition for controllably flowing at least some of the molten glass by gravity therethrough upon a planned or unplanned condition. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein one or more walls of the sidewall structure comprises fluid passages sufficient to pass cooling fluid through the one or more walls of the sidewall structure. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the exit transition region comprises fluid passages sufficient to pass cooling fluid therethrough for cooling the molten glass as it passes through the at least one passage to a temperature just above a desired glass product forming temperature.
Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the inlet transition region floor comprises a planar floor that slants upward in the flow direction at an angle “γ” to horizontal. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the inlet transition region floor comprises two or more planar horizontal steps of different heights, resulting in different depths of molten glass therein, wherein the steps increase in height (decrease in depth) in the flow direction. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the steps have an upper most layer of refractory adhered thereto, the refractory shaped to have a smooth transition from step to step, the refractory of the upper most layer also being used to form the raised curb and an upper-most layer of the fining chamber floor in the primary fining region and the exit transition region. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the inlet transition region floor comprises a non-planar floor that curves generally upward (concave or convex) in the flow direction. Certain apparatus embodiments may further comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of wherein the inlet transition region width increases linearly from its initial width to its final width, the left and right sidewalls of the inlet transition region angled at angles “α” and “β” to the longitudinal axis, and the exit transition region width decreases linearly from its initial width to its final width, the left and right sidewalls of the exit transition region angled at angles “α*” and “β*” to the longitudinal axis, wherein “α” and “β” are the same or different and “α*” and “β*” are the same or different.
In certain apparatus embodiments one or more regions of the fining chamber may include one or more Joulean heating elements to enhance the fining action, especially during periods of high pull rate (high flow through the fining chamber). The elements could be positioned underneath the foam layer and increase the rise rate of the bubbles. Positioning electrical Joulean elements below the foam layer during high pull conditions may minimize the impact of the foam layer on heat transfer from combustion burners above the foam layer. For example, one or more Joulean heating elements could be positioned randomly or non-randomly in the primary fining chamber, positioned under the level of molten mass of glass and bubbles. One or more Joulean heating elements could be positioned in the inlet transition and/or exit transition regions. In order that the elements are underneath the foam layer, the elements may be positioned on, or just above (for example, about 2 inches or less above) the floor of the region in question.
Various terms are used throughout this disclosure. “Submerged” as used herein means that combustion gases emanate from a combustion burner exit that is under the level of the molten glass, and “non-submerged” means that combustion gases do not emanate from combustion burner exits under the level of molten glass, whether in an SCM or downstream apparatus. Both submerged and non-submerged burners may be roof-mounted, floor-mounted, wall-mounted, or any combination thereof (for example, two floor mounted burners and one wall mounted burner). “SC” as used herein means “submerged combustion” unless otherwise specifically noted, and “SCM” means submerged combustion melter unless otherwise specifically noted.
The terms “foam” and “foamy” include froths, spume, suds, heads, fluffs, fizzes, lathers, effervesces, layer and the like. The term “bubble” means a thin, shaped, gas-filled film of molten glass. The shape may be spherical, hemispherical, rectangular, polyhedral, ovoid, and the like. The gas or “bubble atmosphere” in the gas-filled SC bubbles may comprise oxygen or other oxidants, nitrogen, combustion products (including but not limited to, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, NON, SOx, H2S, and water), reaction products of glass-forming ingredients (for example, but not limited to, sand (primarily SiO2), clay, limestone (primarily CaCO3), burnt dolomitic lime, borax and boric acid, and the like. Bubbles may include solids particles, for example soot particles, either in the film, the gas inside the film, or both. The term “glass foam” means foam where the liquid film comprises molten glass. “Glass level” means the distance measured from the floor of a fining chamber to the upper liquid level of the molten glass, and “foam level” means the distance measured from the top of the atmosphere above the foam layer to the upper surface of the foam layer. “Foam height” (equivalent to foam thickness) is the distance measured between the glass level and foam level. “Depth” of a fining chamber region means the distance from the top of the molten glass and/or foam to the floor of the region in question. “Length” means distance measured parallel to the longitudinal axis of the fining chamber, while “width” is measured perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the fining chamber and in a plane substantially parallel to the level of the molten glass/foam in the fining chamber.
As used herein the term “combustion” means deflagration-type combustion unless other types of combustion are specifically noted, such as detonation-type combustion. Deflagration is sub-sonic combustion that usually propagates through thermal conductivity; hot burning material heats the next layer of cold material and ignites it. Detonation is supersonic and primarily propagates through shock. As used herein the terms “combustion gases” and “combustion products” means substantially gaseous mixtures of combusted fuel, any excess oxidant, and combustion products, such as oxides of carbon (such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide), oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, and water, whether from deflagration, detonation, or combination thereof. Combustion products may include liquids and solids, for example soot and unburned or non-combusted fuels.
“Oxidant” as used herein includes air and gases having the same molar concentrations of oxygen and nitrogen as air (synthetic air), oxygen-enriched air (air having oxygen concentration greater than 21 mole percent), and “pure” oxygen, such as industrial grade oxygen, food grade oxygen, and cryogenic oxygen. Oxygen-enriched air may have 50 mole percent or more oxygen, and in certain embodiments may be 90 mole percent or more oxygen.
The term “fuel”, according to this disclosure, means a combustible composition comprising a major portion of, for example, methane, natural gas, liquefied natural gas, propane, hydrogen, steam-reformed natural gas, atomized hydrocarbon oil, combustible powders and other flowable solids (for example coal powders, carbon black, soot, and the like), and the like. Fuels useful in the disclosure may comprise minor amounts of non-fuels therein, including oxidants, for purposes such as premixing the fuel with the oxidant, or atomizing liquid or particulate fuels. As used herein the term “fuel” includes gaseous fuels, liquid fuels, flowable solids, such as powdered carbon or particulate material, waste materials, slurries, and mixtures or other combinations thereof.
The sources of oxidant and fuel may be one or more conduits, pipelines, storage facility, cylinders, or, in embodiments where the oxidant is air, ambient air. Oxygen-enriched oxidants may be supplied from a pipeline, cylinder, storage facility, cryogenic air separation unit, membrane permeation separator, or adsorption unit such as a vacuum swing adsorption unit.
The primary fining region of the fining chamber is defined at least by a floor and a wall structure extending upwards from the floor to form a space in which molten glass may be present, whether flowing or not. In certain embodiments primary fining region of the fining chamber may include a roof and a wall structure connecting the floor and roof. The primary fining region of the fining chamber may have any operable cross-sectional shape (for example, but not limited to, rectangular, oval, circular, trapezoidal, hexagonal, and the like) and any flow path shape (for example, but not limited to, straight, zigzag, curved, and combinations thereof), as long as the depth of the primary fining region is greater than the depth of the raised curb and less than the depth of the inlet transition region. The width may be constant or changing from inlet to outlet of the primary fining chamber. The length may also depend on the Reynolds number of the molten glass flowing over the raised curb. Higher Reynolds numbers may require longer primary fining regions to achieve the desired temperature homogenization. As used herein the term “well-fined” means that in certain embodiments the molten glass has less than 15 bubbles per cm3, or in some embodiments less than 2 bubbles per cm3, or has a density within 95 percent of the density of the glass being produced with no bubbles, or in certain embodiments has a density within 99 percent of the density of the glass being produced with no bubbles.
Fining chambers and associated structures, as well as conduits used in burners and devices for delivery of compositions useful in systems and methods of the present disclosure may be comprised of metal, ceramic, ceramic-lined metal, or combination thereof. Suitable metals include stainless steels, for example, but not limited to, 304 and 316 steel, as well as titanium alloys, aluminum alloys, and the like. Suitable materials and thickness for the glass-contact refractory and precious metals, if present, are discussed herein below. In any particular system and method, the fining chamber geometry and associated structural features may be influenced by the type of glass being produced and degree of foaming.
Certain submerged and non-submerged combustion burners, certain components in and/or protruding through one or more of the floor, roof, and sidewall structure configured to heat or maintain temperature of the foamed glass in the fining chamber, SCM or otherwise, may be fluid-cooled, and in the case of burners may include first and second (or more) concentric conduits. In the case of burners, the first conduit may be fluidly connected at one end to a source of fuel, the second conduit may be fluidly connected to a source of oxidant, and a third substantially concentric conduit may connect to a source of cooling fluid.
Certain systems of this disclosure may comprise one or more non-submerged burners. Suitable non-submerged combustion burners may comprise a fuel inlet conduit having an exit nozzle, the conduit and nozzle inserted into a cavity of a ceramic burner block, the ceramic burner block in turn inserted into either the roof or the wall structure, or both the roof and wall structure of the fining chamber.
In certain apparatus, systems, and methods one or more burners may be adjustable with respect to direction of flow of the combustion products. Adjustment may be via automatic, semi-automatic, or manual control. Certain apparatus, system, and method embodiments may comprise a burner mount that mounts the burner in the wall structure, roof, or floor of the fining chamber comprising a refractory, or refractory-lined ball joint or ball turret. Other burner mounts may comprise rails mounted in slots in the wall or roof. In yet other embodiments the burners may be mounted outside of the fining chamber, on supports that allow adjustment of the combustion products flow direction. Useable supports include those comprising ball joints, cradles, rails, and the like.
In certain apparatus, systems, and methods of the present disclosure, the fining chamber may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of one or more foam destruction devices as described in assignee's co-pending application Ser. No. 13/644,104, filed Oct. 3, 2012, now Pat. No. 9,096,452, issued Aug. 4, 2015.
Specific non-limiting apparatus, system, and method embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure will now be presented in conjunction with the attached drawing figures. The same numerals are used for the same or similar features in the various figures. In the views illustrated in the drawing figures, it will be understood in the case of
Referring now to
Method embodiment 500 (
Precious metals for use herein for part or all of glass-contact refractory layer 56 may be platinum group metals or alloys thereof, such as platinum, rhodium, or platinum/rhodium alloy. Molybdenum and alloys thereof with other metals may also be used, as long as they meet temperature requirements. The thickness of a precious metal layer would not be more than necessary, but is technically limited only by the desired dimensions of the flow path of molten glass and footprint of the fining chamber. Precious metal may in some embodiments be 0.5 inch (1.25 cm) thick or more if cost were no impediment, but typically may range from about 0.02 to about 0.1 inch (about 0.05 cm to about 0.25 cm).
In certain embodiments, as will be understood, the shape of the roof or cover, floor, and sidewall structure of fining chambers described herein, as well as the location of the level or height of molten foamed or unfoamed glass, the amount of entrained bubbles, and amount of bubbles in foam layers, and sizes of primary fining region, ITR, and ETR may vary widely.
In certain embodiments employing one or more burners in ports 16 (
Certain apparatus, systems and methods of the present disclosure may be combined with strategies for foam de-stabilization. For example, adding nitrogen as a treating composition to the molten mass of glass and bubbles in the ITR or the primary fining chamber may tend to make bubbles in an upper glass foam phase less stable when there is the presence of a high moisture atmosphere. A high moisture atmosphere may exist for example when one or more high momentum burners (whether oxy/fuel or not) are used as impingement burners in the ITR and/or primary fining chamber to impinge on upper glass foam phase. The use of one or more high momentum impingement burners (whether oxy/fuel or not) in a flow channel is described in assignee's co-pending application Ser. No. 13/493,170, filed Jun. 11, 2012, now Pat. No. 8,707,739, issued Apr. 29, 2014.
The flow rate of the molten glass through the ITR, primary fining chamber, and ETR will depend on many factors, including the geometry and size of the source (SCM, or other melter) feeding the fining chamber, temperature of the melt, viscosity of the melt, and like parameters, but in general the flow rate of molten glass containing bubbles may range from about 0.5 lb./min to about 5000 lbs./min or more (about 0.23 kg/min to about 2300 kg/min or more), or from about 10 lbs./min to about 500 lbs./min (from about 4.5 kg/min to about 227 kg/min), or from about 100 lbs./min to 300 lbs./min (from about 45 kg/min to about 136 kg/min).
As mentioned, certain embodiments may use high and/or low momentum burners for heat and/or foam de-stabilization in the ITR, and/or primary fining chamber, and/or ETR. For high momentum burners burning natural gas, the burners may have a fuel firing rate, per burner, ranging from about 10 to about 1000 scfh (from about 280 L/hr. to about 28,000 L/hr.); an oxygen firing rate ranging from about 15 to about 2500 scfh (from about 420 L/hr. to about 71,000 L/hr.); a combustion ratio ranging from about 1.5 to about 2.5; nozzle velocity ratio (ratio of velocity of fuel to oxygen at the fuel nozzle tip) ranging from about 0.5 to about 2.5; fuel gas velocity ranging from about 150 to about 1000 ft./sec (from about 46 m/sec to about 300 m/sec); and oxygen velocity ranging from about 150 to about 1000 ft./sec (from about 46 m/sec to about 300 m/sec). Of course these numbers depend on the heating value of the fuel, amount of oxygen in the “oxygen” stream, temperatures and pressures of the fuel and oxidant, and the like, among other parameters. In one typical operation, the high momentum burner would have a combustion ratio of 2.05:1; a velocity ratio of 1; firing rate of natural gas of 500 scfh (14,000 L/hr.) and 1075 scfh (30,400 L/hr.) oxygen; natural gas and oxygen velocities each of 270 ft./sec (80 m/sec); natural gas pressure of 1 psig (6.9 KPa); and oxygen pressure of 0.6 psig (4.1 KPa), pressures measured at the entrance to the combustion chamber.
Low momentum burners useful in apparatus, systems, and methods of this disclosure may include some of the features of those disclosed in assignee's U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/268,130, filed Oct. 7, 2011, now Pat. No. 9,021,838, issued May 5, 2015.
For low momentum burners using natural gas as fuel, the burners may have a fuel firing rate, per burner, ranging from about 0.4 to about 500 scfh (from about 11 L/hr. to about 14,000 L/hr.); an oxygen firing rate ranging from about 0.6 to about 1000 scfh (from about 17 L/hr. to about 28,400 L/hr.); a combustion ratio ranging from about 1.5 to about 2.5; nozzle velocity ratio (ratio of velocity of fuel to oxygen at the fuel nozzle tip) ranging from about 0.5 to about 2.5; a fuel velocity ranging from about 6 ft./second to about 40 ft./second (about 2 meters/second to about 12 meters/second) and an oxidant velocity ranging from about 6 ft./second to about 40 ft./second (about 2 meters/second to about 12 meters/second).
Those of skill in this art will readily understand the need for, and be able to construct suitable fuel supply conduits and oxidant supply conduits, as well as respective flow control valves, threaded fittings, quick connect/disconnect fittings, hose fittings, and the like.
SCMs and other sources of molten glass containing bubbles may be fed a variety of feed materials. In SCMs processing glass batch, the initial raw material may include any material suitable for forming molten glass such as, for example, limestone, glass, sand, soda ash, feldspar and mixtures thereof. A glass composition for producing glass fibers known as “E-glass” typically includes 52-56% SiO2, 12-16% Al2O3, 0-0.8% Fe2O3, 16-25% CaO, 0-6% MgO, 0-10% B2O3, 0-2% Na2O+K2O, 0-1.5% TiO2 and 0-1% F2. Other glass compositions may be used, such as those described in assignee's published U.S. applications 20070220922 and 20080276652. The initial raw material to provide these glass compositions can be calculated in known manner from the desired concentrations of glass components, molar masses of glass components, chemical formulas of batch components, and the molar masses of the batch components. Typical E-glass batches include those reproduced in Table 1, borrowed from US20070220922. Notice that during glass melting, carbon dioxide (from lime) and water (borax) evaporate. The initial raw material can be provided in any form such as, for example, relatively small particles.
SCMs may also be fed by one or more roll stands, which in turn supports one or more rolls of glass mat, as described in assignee's co-pending US application Ser. No. 12/888,970, filed Sep. 23, 2010, now Pat. No. 8,650,914, issued Feb. 18, 2014, incorporated herein by reference. In certain embodiments powered nip rolls may include cutting knives or other cutting components to cut or chop the mat (or roving, in those embodiments processing roving) into smaller length pieces prior to entering the SCM. Also provided in certain embodiments may be a glass batch feeder. Glass batch feeders are well-known in this art and require no further explanation.
The ITR, primary fining chamber, and ETR may include refractory fluid-cooled panels. Liquid-cooled panels may be used, having one or more conduits or tubing therein, supplied with liquid through one conduit, with another conduit discharging warmed liquid, routing heat transferred from inside the apparatus to the liquid away from the apparatus. Liquid-cooled panels may also include a thin refractory liner, which minimizes heat losses from the apparatus, but allows formation of a thin frozen glass shell to form on the surfaces and prevent any refractory wear and associated glass contamination. Other useful cooled panels include air-cooled panels, comprising a conduit that has a first, small diameter section, and a large diameter section. Warmed air transverses the conduits such that the conduit having the larger diameter accommodates expansion of the air as it is warmed. Air-cooled panels are described more fully in U.S. Pat. No. 6,244,197. In certain embodiments, the refractory fluid cooled-panels may be cooled by a heat transfer fluid selected from the group consisting of gaseous, liquid, or combinations of gaseous and liquid compositions that functions or is capable of being modified to function as a heat transfer fluid. Gaseous heat transfer fluids may be selected from air, including ambient air and treated air (for air treated to remove moisture), inert inorganic gases, such as nitrogen, argon, and helium, inert organic gases such as fluoro-, chloro- and chlorofluorocarbons, including perfluorinated versions, such as tetrafluoromethane, and hexafluoroethane, and tetrafluoroethylene, and the like, and mixtures of inert gases with small portions of non-inert gases, such as hydrogen. Heat transfer liquids may be selected from inert liquids that may be organic, inorganic, or some combination thereof, for example, salt solutions, glycol solutions, oils and the like. Other possible heat transfer fluids include steam (if cooler than the item to be cooled), carbon dioxide, or mixtures thereof with nitrogen. Heat transfer fluids may be compositions comprising both gas and liquid phases, such as the higher chlorofluorocarbons.
Glass-contact refractory lining 56 may or may not be necessary in all embodiments, but when present may have thickness ranging from just over 0 to about 2 inches (about 5 cm), or from just over 0 to about 1 inch (about 2.5 cm) when using water-cooled sidewalls, and may have thickness ranging from about 1 inch up to about 4 inches (from about 2.5 to about 10 cm), or from about 1 inch up to about 3 inches (from about 2.5 to about 7.5 cm) when using non-water-cooled sidewalls, however, greater thickness may entail more expense without resultant greater benefit, and thickness may be different depending on the composition of the refractory and when using cooling fluids other than water. The glass-contact refractory lining may be one or more layers. Glass-contact refractory used in Ping chambers described herein may be fused cast materials based on AZS (alumina-zirconia-silica), α/β alumina, zirconium oxide, chromium oxide, chrome corundum, so-called “dense chrome”, and the like. One “dense chrome” material is available from Saint Gobain under the trade name SEFPRO, such as C1215 and C1221. Other useable “dense chrome” materials are available from the North American Refractories Co., Cleveland, Ohio (U.S.A.) under the trade designations SERV 50 and SERV 95. Other suitable materials for components that require resistance to high temperatures are fused zirconia (ZrO2), fused cast AZS (alumina-zirconia-silica), rebonded AZS, or fused cast alumina (Al2O3). The choice of a particular material is dictated among other parameters by the geometry of the apparatus, the type of glass being produced, and the amount of foam and/or bubbles in or on the molten glass.
To ascertain the local and bulk distribution (size and/or location) of bubbles within the molten glass, and therefore the local and bulk glass density and/or glass foam density, methods and systems as described in assignee's co-pending application Ser. No. 13/752,672, filed Jan. 29, 2013, now Pat. No. 9,115,017, issued Aug. 25, 2015, may be employed, comprising an electromagnetic (EM) sensor comprising one or more EM sources and one or more EM detectors. When the terms “EM sensor” and “sensor” are used, they will be understood to mean a device having at least one EM source and at least one EM detector. In certain embodiments the EM source may be referred to as a nuclear source. The electromagnetism may be referred to as radiation, and may be in wave, particle and wave/particle formats. The EM source or sources and EM detector or detectors may provide feedback on the density gradient of the molten glass in a vessel. Based on the path the EM wave must travel, the glass density gradient within the path, the amount of radiation detected by the EM detector is a function of both the glass level as well as the range of densities of the molten foamed glass in the path of the radiation. If both the EM source and the EM detector are stationary, then measuring the glass level can provide an indication regarding how much of a change in detection could be due to a change in effective glass level, and how much is due to a change in glass density. Cobalt-60 and caesium-137 are the most suitable gamma radiation sources for radiation processing because of the relatively high energy of their gamma rays and fairly long half-life (5.27 years for cobalt-60 and 30.1 years for caesium-137). If used, the EM source may be sized appropriately depending upon the expected attenuation between the EM source and the EM detector due to distance, vessel wall thickness, vessel wall density, width of the molten foamed glass pool or stream being analyzed, molten foamed glass density, and EM detector size being utilized. Provided this information, a vendor supplying the EM source and EM detector should be able to size the EM source appropriately without undue experimentation.
Those having ordinary skill in this art will appreciate that there are many possible variations of the systems and methods described herein, and will be able to devise alternatives and improvements to those described herein that are nevertheless considered to be within the claims. For example, raised curb 40 may exist as a series of several raised curbs of different heights; for example higher in the middle and lower toward sidewalls. Another alternative may be for the raised curb to be angled to the longitudinal axis of the fining chamber. In other embodiments, the raised curb may be in a single V-pattern, with the apex pointing upstream. Other variations will no doubt occur to those skilled in the art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1716433 | Ellis | Jun 1929 | A |
1989103 | McKelvey et al. | Jan 1935 | A |
2119948 | Blau | Jun 1938 | A |
2174533 | See et al. | Oct 1939 | A |
2118479 | McCaskey | Jan 1940 | A |
2269459 | Kleist | Jan 1942 | A |
2432942 | See et al. | Dec 1947 | A |
2455907 | Slayter | Jan 1948 | A |
2679749 | Poole | Jun 1954 | A |
2718096 | Henry et al. | Sep 1955 | A |
2773545 | Petersen | Dec 1956 | A |
2781756 | Kobe | Feb 1957 | A |
2878644 | Fenn | Mar 1959 | A |
2890166 | Heinze | Jun 1959 | A |
2902029 | Hill | Sep 1959 | A |
2981250 | Stewart | Apr 1961 | A |
3020165 | Davis | Feb 1962 | A |
3056283 | Tiede | Oct 1962 | A |
3073683 | Switzer et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3084392 | Labino | Apr 1963 | A |
3088812 | Bitterlich et al. | May 1963 | A |
3104947 | Switzer et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
3160578 | Saxton et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3165452 | Williams | Jan 1965 | A |
3170781 | Keefer | Feb 1965 | A |
3174820 | See et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3215189 | Bauer | Nov 1965 | A |
3224855 | Plumat | Dec 1965 | A |
3237929 | Plumat et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3241548 | See et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3245769 | Eck et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3248205 | Dolf et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3260587 | Dolf et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3268313 | Burgman et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3285834 | Guerrieri et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3294512 | Penberthy | Dec 1966 | A |
3325298 | Brown | Jun 1967 | A |
3385686 | Plumat et al. | May 1968 | A |
3402025 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
3407805 | Bougard | Oct 1968 | A |
3407862 | Mustian, Jr. | Oct 1968 | A |
3421873 | Burgman et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3432399 | Schutt | Mar 1969 | A |
3445214 | Oremesher | May 1969 | A |
3498779 | Hathaway | Mar 1970 | A |
3510393 | Burgman et al. | May 1970 | A |
3519412 | Olink | Jul 1970 | A |
3525674 | Barnebey | Aug 1970 | A |
3533770 | Adler et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3563683 | Hess | Feb 1971 | A |
3592151 | Webber | Jul 1971 | A |
3592623 | Shepherd | Jul 1971 | A |
3606825 | Johnson | Sep 1971 | A |
3617234 | Hawkins et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3627504 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3692017 | Glachant et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3717139 | Guillet et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3738792 | Feng | Jun 1973 | A |
3741742 | Jennings | Jun 1973 | A |
3746527 | Knavish et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3747588 | Booth | Jul 1973 | A |
3754879 | Phaneuf | Aug 1973 | A |
3756800 | Phaneuf | Sep 1973 | A |
3763915 | Perry et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3764287 | Brocious | Oct 1973 | A |
3771988 | Starr | Nov 1973 | A |
3818893 | Kataoka et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3835909 | Douglas et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3840002 | Douglas et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3856496 | Nesbitt et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3885945 | Rees et al. | May 1975 | A |
3907585 | Francel et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3913560 | Lazarre et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3951635 | Rough | Apr 1976 | A |
3976464 | Wardlaw | Aug 1976 | A |
4001001 | Knavish et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4004903 | Daman et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4083711 | Jensen | Apr 1978 | A |
4110098 | Mattmuller | Aug 1978 | A |
4153438 | Stream | May 1979 | A |
4185982 | Schwenninger | Jan 1980 | A |
4203761 | Rose | May 1980 | A |
4205966 | Horikawa | Jun 1980 | A |
4226564 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4238226 | Sanzenbacher et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4249927 | Fakuzaki et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4270740 | Sanzenbacher et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4282023 | Hammel et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4303435 | Sleighter | Dec 1981 | A |
4309204 | Brooks | Jan 1982 | A |
4323718 | Buhring et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4349376 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4360373 | Pecoraro | Nov 1982 | A |
4397692 | Ramge et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4406683 | Demarest | Sep 1983 | A |
4413882 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4424071 | Steitz | Jan 1984 | A |
4432780 | Propster et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4488537 | Laurent | Dec 1984 | A |
4539034 | Hanneken | Sep 1985 | A |
4542106 | Sproull | Sep 1985 | A |
4545800 | Won et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4626199 | Bounini | Dec 1986 | A |
4632687 | Kunkle et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4634461 | Demarest, Jr. et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4657586 | Masterson et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4693740 | Noiret | Sep 1987 | A |
4723708 | Berger et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4735642 | Jensen et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4738938 | Kunkle et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4758259 | Jensen | Jul 1988 | A |
4798616 | Knavish et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4814387 | Donat | Mar 1989 | A |
4816056 | Tsai et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4877436 | Sheinkop | Oct 1989 | A |
4877449 | Khinkis | Oct 1989 | A |
4882736 | Pieper | Nov 1989 | A |
4886539 | Gerutti et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4919700 | Pecoraro et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4927886 | Backderf et al. | May 1990 | A |
4929266 | Cozac | May 1990 | A |
4953376 | Merlone | Sep 1990 | A |
5011086 | Sonnleitner | Apr 1991 | A |
5032230 | Shepherd | Jul 1991 | A |
5052874 | Johanson | Oct 1991 | A |
5062789 | Gitman | Nov 1991 | A |
5097802 | Clawson | Mar 1992 | A |
5168109 | Backderf et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5169424 | Grinnen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5194081 | Trevelyan | Mar 1993 | A |
5199866 | Joshi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5204082 | Schendel | Apr 1993 | A |
5299929 | Yap | Apr 1994 | A |
5360171 | Yap | Nov 1994 | A |
5370723 | Trevelyan | Dec 1994 | A |
5374595 | Dumbaugh et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5405082 | Brown et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5449286 | Snyder et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5473885 | Hunter, Jr. et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5483548 | Coble | Jan 1996 | A |
5490775 | Joshi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5522721 | Drogue et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545031 | Joshi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575637 | Slavejkov et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5595703 | Swaelens et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606965 | Panz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613994 | Muniz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615668 | Panz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5636623 | Panz et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5672827 | Jursich | Sep 1997 | A |
5713668 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718741 | Hull et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5736476 | Warzke et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743723 | Iatrides et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5765964 | Calcote et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5814121 | Travis | Sep 1998 | A |
5829962 | Drasek et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833447 | Bodelin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849058 | Takeshita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5863195 | Feldermann | Jan 1999 | A |
5944864 | Hull et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954498 | Joshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5975886 | Philippe | Nov 1999 | A |
5979191 | Jian | Nov 1999 | A |
5984667 | Phillippe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993203 | Koppang | Nov 1999 | A |
6029910 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036480 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039787 | Edlinger | Mar 2000 | A |
6045353 | VonDrasek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068468 | Phillippe et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071116 | Philippe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074197 | Philippe | Jun 2000 | A |
6077072 | Marin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085551 | Pieper et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6109062 | Richards | Aug 2000 | A |
6113389 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6116896 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119484 | Takei | Sep 2000 | A |
6120889 | Turner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123542 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126438 | Joshi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154481 | Sorg | Nov 2000 | A |
6156285 | Adams et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171100 | Joshi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178777 | Chenoweth | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183848 | Turner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210151 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6210703 | Novich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237369 | LeBlanc et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241514 | Joshi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244197 | Coble | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244857 | VonDrasek et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247315 | Marin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250136 | Igreja | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250916 | Philippe et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6274164 | Novich | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276924 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276928 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293277 | Panz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308534 | Takei | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314760 | Chenoweth | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314896 | Marin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332339 | Kawaguchi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338337 | Panz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339610 | Hoyer | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344747 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357264 | Richards | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6386271 | Kawamoto et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405564 | Takei | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418755 | Chenoweth | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6422041 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454562 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460376 | Jeanvoine et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6536238 | Kawaguchi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6536651 | Ezumi et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6558606 | Kulkarni et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578779 | Dion | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6660106 | Babel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6694791 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701617 | Li et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705118 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708527 | Ibarlucea et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711942 | Getman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715319 | Barrow et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6722161 | LeBlanc | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736129 | Smith | May 2004 | B1 |
6739152 | Jeanvoine et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6796147 | Borysowicz et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797351 | Kulkarni et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6854290 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857999 | Jeanvoine | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6883349 | Jeanvoine | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6918256 | Gutmark et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7027467 | Baev et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7116888 | Aitken et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7134300 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7168395 | Engdahl | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7231788 | Karetta et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7273583 | Rue et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7330634 | Aitken et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7383698 | Ichinose et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392668 | Adams et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7428827 | Maugendre et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7441686 | Odajima et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448231 | Jeanvoine et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454925 | DeAngelis et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7509819 | Baker et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7565819 | Jeanvoine et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578988 | Jacques et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581948 | Borders et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7622677 | Barberree et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624595 | Jeanvoine et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7748592 | Koga et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7767606 | McGinnis et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778290 | Sacks et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7781562 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7802452 | Borders et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7832365 | Hannum et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845314 | Smith | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855267 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8033254 | Hannum et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8279899 | Kitabayashi | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8285411 | Hull et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20020086077 | Noller et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020134112 | Barrow et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152770 | Becher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162358 | Jeanvoine et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020166343 | LeBlanc | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030015000 | Hayes et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029197 | Jeanvoine et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037571 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030066315 | Sakai | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040099009 | Linz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040131988 | Baker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168474 | Jeanvoine et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182113 | Tomamoto | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224833 | Jeanvoine et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050039491 | Maugendre et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050103323 | Engdahl | May 2005 | A1 |
20050236747 | Rue et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060000239 | Jeanvoine et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060162387 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174655 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060233512 | Aitken et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257097 | Aitken et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287482 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293494 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293495 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070106054 | Crawford et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122332 | Jacques et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130994 | Boratav et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070212546 | Jeanvoine et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220922 | Bauer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070278404 | Spanke et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080035078 | Li | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080120997 | Takeshita | May 2008 | A1 |
20080227615 | McGinnis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256981 | Jacques et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276652 | Bauer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293857 | Crawford et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090042709 | Jeanvoine et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090220899 | Spangelo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100064732 | Jeanvoine et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087574 | Crawford et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089383 | Cowles | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100120979 | Crawford et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100143601 | Hawtof et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100227971 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236323 | D'Angelico et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100300153 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304314 | Rouchy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100307196 | Richardson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326137 | Rouchy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016922 | Kitamura | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110034316 | Leister | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054091 | Crawford et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110061642 | Rouchy et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088432 | Purnode et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107670 | Galley et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110236846 | Rue | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110308280 | Huber | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120077135 | Charbonneau | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130086944 | Shock et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086949 | Charbonneau | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086950 | Huber et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086951 | Charbonneau et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086952 | Charbonneau et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
36 29 965 | Mar 1988 | DE |
44 24 814 | Jan 1996 | DE |
196 19 919 | Aug 1997 | DE |
100 29 983 | Jan 2002 | DE |
100 29 983 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10 2005 033330 | Aug 2006 | DE |
0 181 248 | Oct 1989 | EP |
1 337 789 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 990 321 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2 133 315 | Dec 2009 | EP |
1 986 966 | Apr 2010 | EP |
1 667 934 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2 397 446 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2 433 911 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2 578 548 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2 740 860 | Sep 1997 | FR |
191301772 | Jan 1914 | GB |
191407633 | Jan 1914 | GB |
164073 | May 1921 | GB |
250 536 | Jul 1926 | GB |
1449439 | Sep 1976 | GB |
1208172 | Jul 1989 | IT |
S58 199728 | Nov 1983 | JP |
H08 290918 | Nov 1996 | JP |
2000 0050572 | Aug 2000 | KR |
114827 | Jul 1999 | RO |
9855411 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2008103291 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009091558 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010011701 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010045196 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2013 162986 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013 188082 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“AccuTru Temperature Measurement,” AccuTru International Corporation, 2003. |
Muijsenberg, H. P. H., Neff, G., Muller, J., Chmelar, J., Bodi, R. and Matustikj, F. (2008) “An Advanced Control System to Increase Glass Quality and Glass Production Yields Based on GS ESLLI Technology”, in a Collection of Papers Presented at the 66th Conference on Glass Problems: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, vol. 27, Issue 1 (ed W. M. Kriven), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9780470291306.ch3. |
Muijsenberg, E., Eisenga, M. and Buchmayer, J. (2010) “Increase of Glass Production Efficiency and Energy Efficiency with Model-Based Predictive Control”, in 70th Conference on Glass Problems: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, vol. 31, Issue 1 (ed C. H. Drummond), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi:10.1002/9780470769843.ch15. |
“Canty Process Technology” brochure, date unknown, copy received in Apr. 2012 at American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Spring Meeting, Houston, TX. |
Stevenson, “Foam Engineering: Fundamentals and Applications”, Chapter 16, pp. 336-389, John Wiley & Sons (Mar. 13, 2012). |
Clare et al., “Density and Surface Tension of Borate Containing Silicate Melts”, Glass Technology—European Journal of Glass Science and Technology, Part A, pp. 59-62, vol. 44, No. 2, Apr. 1, 2003. |
Seward, T.P., “Modeling of Glass Making Processes for Improved Efficiency”, DE-FG07-96EE41262, Final Report, Mar. 31, 2003. |
Conradt et al, Foaming behavior on glass melts, Glastechniche Berichte 60 (1987) Nr. 6, S. 189-201 Abstract Fraunhofer ISC. |
Kim et al., “Foaming in Glass Melts Produced by Sodium Sulfate Decomposition under Isothermal Conditions”, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 74(3), pp. 551-555, 1991. |
Kim et al., “Foaming in Glass Melts Produced by Sodium Sulfate Decomposition under Ramp Heating Conditions”, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 75(11), pp. 2959-2963, 1992. |
Kim et al., “Effect of Furnace Atmosphere on E-glass Foaming”, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 352(50/51), pp. 5287-5295, 2006. |
Van Limpt, et al., “Modelling the evaporation of boron species. Part 1. Alkali-free borosilicate glass melts”, Glass Technology—European Journal of Glass Science and Technology, Part A, 52(3): pp. 77-87, 2011. |
“Gamma Irradiators for Radiation Processing” Booklet, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. |
Higley, BA, Glass Melter System Technologies for Vitrification of High-Sodium-Content Low-Level, Radioactive, Liquid Wastes—Phase I: SBS Demonstration With Simulated Low-Level Waste—Final Test Report, Westinghouse Hanford Company. |
Report for Treating Hanford LAW and WTP SW Simulants: Pilot Plan Mineralizing Flowsheet Apr. 2009, Department of Energy Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center by THOR Treatment Technologies, LLC. |
“Glass Technologies—The Legacy of a Successful Public-Private Partnership”, 2007, U.S. Department of Energy, pp. 1-32. |
“Glass Melting Technology—A Technical and Economic Assessment,” 2004, U.S. Department of Energy, pp. 1-292. |
Rue, “Energy-Efficient Glass Melting—The Next Generation Melter”, Gas Technology Institute, Project No. 20621 Final Report (2008). |
“Glass Industry of the Future”, United States Department of Energy, report 02-GA50113-03, pp. 1-17, Sep. 30, 2008. |
Olabin, V.M. et al, “Submerged Combustion Furnace for Glass Melts,” Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Jan. 1, 1996, pp. 84-92, vol. 17—No. 2, American Ceramic Society Inc., US. |
Furman, BJ, ME 120 Experimental Methods Vibration Measurement, San Jose University Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160122221 A1 | May 2016 | US |