Patent Grant
11077009
The present application is a U.S. National Phase of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2016/065601, entitled “APPARATUS TO APPLY FORCES IN A THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE,” filed on Jul. 1, 2016. International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2016/065601 claims priority to European Patent Application No. 15175238.3, filed on Jul. 3, 2015. The entire contents of each of the above-cited applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
The present invention relates to the field of robotic systems, in particular to robotic systems useful to apply forces to an object or a subject, in particular a person. It also relates to a robotic system useful to unload the object/person from its weight. More in particular, it relates to a robotic system useful in locomotor rehabilitation programs, for example in subjects suffering from spinal cord injuries or more generally to motion impairment.
In locomotor rehabilitation of patients with neurological impairments gait and balance training is essential.
Robotic overhead support systems have been developed to help patients training, for example by relieving them of part of their body weight.
Existing body-weight support systems or overhead gantry cranes are either not three-dimensional, i.e. they do not allow three-dimensional gait training, or they have high friction and inertia, or they require a multitude of strong and powerful actuators.
Systems known in prior art are conceptualized as classical serial (gantry) or parallel mechanism. In the former case, they require movable gantries to allow three-dimensional application of forces, which involves a massive structure with high inertia. In the case of parallel mechanisms, the actuated degrees of freedom (DOFs) are not decoupled from each other. Therefore, all actuators move in case of a single-DOF movement. Due to this coupling, it is almost impossible to apply forces in a precise manner over a large workspace. Additionally, all actuators have to be dimensioned taking the fastest velocity and the highest force/torque into account which do not necessarily occur in the same DOF.
For example, in Gosselin et al., “On the development of a walking rehabilitation device with a large workspace.” Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011, a fully passive system requiring a moving gantry is described. The system has the main objective to be able to follow the person with an overhead support and compensate part of its weight. The basic principle is a cable-routing system that follows the user in order to provide gravity compensation without hindering walking motions. Disadvantages of this system are its high inertia in the direction orthogonal to the moving gantry and that horizontal forces cannot be applied.
In WO2013117750 an apparatus for unloading a user's body weight, in particular for gait training, is disclosed. The apparatus is characterized by a plurality of ropes deflected by deflection devices and a node coupled to the free ends of said ropes and to a user. Drive units retract and release the ropes to adjust the rope force so as to obtain a resulting force exerted on the user via said node in order to unload the user and/or to exert a force on the user in a horizontal plane. This is a fully actuated system that requires strong and powerful actuators to work. This apparatus has been commercialized as THE FLOAT by Lutz Medical Engineering, Switzerland.
Similar systems are disclosed in Vallery, H., et al. “Multidirectional transparent support for overground gait training.” Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2013 and Von Zitzewitz, Joachim, et al. “Use of passively guided deflection units and energy-storing elements to increase the application range of wire robots.” Cable-Driven Parallel Robots. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. 167-184.
These systems, which are a special class of parallel mechanisms, have the mentioned disadvantage that they require a multitude of strong and powerful actuators because the actuated degrees of freedom (DOFs) are not decoupled from each other.
Therefore, there is still the need of a system with low inertia in all DoFs which can be used to apply forces to a user in a precise manner over a large workspace while at the same time not requiring many strong actuators. More particularly, to apply forces in a precise manner means that the force rendering errors in each single DOF are at least one or two orders of magnitude smaller compared to the forces that the device aims to apply, for example to provide body weight support to a human user.
It is known from prior art that control performance in general can be improved by a minimal number of actuators and/or by letting high low-bandwidth forces be applied by different actuators than low high-bandwidth forces.
A specific mechanical configuration for the intended application, however, is unknown.
It has now been found an apparatus which allows the manipulation of forces in a three-dimensional space with far lower actuator requirements and a much higher precision than prior-art systems.
The apparatus of the invention combines passive and active elements to minimize actuation requirements while still keeping inertia to a minimum and control precision to a maximum.
Therefore, it has the advantages that it requires minimal actuators but at the same time has a low inertia.
Furthermore, thanks to the specific apparatus design the DOFs requiring a large workspace and high-speed movements are decoupled from the DOFs in which high static forces are applied. This is reached by arranging the actuators and the points to which they apply their force/torque in a different way than in prior art. Differently sized and configured actuators are used, each of which has a different target load and speed and/or drives a different DOF.
The approach of the apparatus of the present invention to decouple the selected DOFs and frequency domains as well as to place the passive elements to enable decoupling of system inertia solves the above mentioned problems in an effective and more easily practicable way.
It is an object of the present invention an apparatus to apply forces to an object or a subject, in particular a person (herein intended also as user) as defined in the appended independent claim.
Other objects of the present invention as well as embodiments of the same will be defined in the dependent claims.
In particular, the apparatus of the invention comprises one or more ropes (or wires) (R1, R1′) wherein each rope extends from a first associated drive unit (Aa, Ac,) to a first associated deflection device, respectively, (D1, D3) and is deflected by the latter, and wherein
said one or more ropes (R1, R1′) are guided by said first deflection devices (D1, D3) toward a second associated deflection device, respectively, (P1, P1′), whereby said one or more ropes (R1, R1′) are deflected by said second deflection device (P1, P1′) toward a third deflection device respectively (D2, D4) that is connected to said first deflection device, particularly in a rigid or elastic manner, and said ropes are deflected by said third deflection device toward a second associated drive unit (Ab, Ad) or a fixed point in space or back to said first associated deflection device (D1, D3,), wherein said second deflection devices (P1, P1′) are connected to an object or a subject (user) and said drive units (Aa, Ab, Ac, Ad) apply forces (Fa, Fb, Fc, Fd) to the respective one or more ropes (R1, R′), which forces add up to a current resulting force vector (Fn) exerted on said user via said second deflection devices (P1, P1′), in order to apply forces and/or moments on said object or user and/or to unload said object or user.
In one embodiment, said second deflection devices (P1, P1′) are interconnected one with each other to a user through one or more common coupling points.
According to this embodiment it is also provided a modular version of the apparatus wherein both sides can be used individually as 2D versions, for example for two patients.
In one embodiment, the apparatus of the invention further comprises one or more further drive units (Ata, Atb, Atc, Atd) applying forces (Fta, Ftb, Ftc, Ftd) to each first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) thus resulting in additional horizontal and/or vertical force components of Fn exerted on the user (4) via said second deflection devices (P1, P1′).
Said further forces (Fta, Ftb, Ftc, Ftd) can be applied to said first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) through one or more further ropes (X′, X″, X′″, X″″) extending from said one or more further drive units (Ata, Atb, Atc, Atd) to said first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4).
In a preferred embodiment, an elastic or viscoelastic connecting element (Y1, Y2, Y3, Y4), for example a spring or a rubber rope, is present between said one or more further ropes (X′, X″, X′″, X′′) and the respective deflection device(s) (D1, D2, D3, D4).
In an embodiment, only one further drive unit (Ata, Atc) and only one further rope (X′, X′″) is present per each second deflection device (P1, P1′), said further rope extending from said first deflection device (D1, D3) through said further drive unit (Ata, Atc) to said associated third deflection device (D2, D4) via a suitable arrangement of additional fixed deflection devices, so that said further drive units (Ata, Atc) apply forces (Fta, Ftb, Ftc, Ftd) to said first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) through said only one further rope (X′, X′″) per second deflection device.
Alternatively, said further forces (Fta, Ftb, Ftc, Ftd) can be applied by one or more further drive units (Ata, Atb, Atc, Atd) directly attached to said first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) via additional ropes.
In another embodiment, the free ends of said rope (R1, R1′) are interconnected so that only one rope is present.
In a further embodiment, both free ends of the rope (R1, R1′) after being deflected by said first, second, and third deflection devices (D1, D3, P1, P1′, D2, D4,) are guided backwards by said third (D2, D4) deflection device with a deflection angle >90° over the first deflection device (D1, D3) and then extend to the respective drive unit (Aa, Ab, Ac, Ad).
In a preferred embodiment, a connecting element (C1, C2) is present between said first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) so as to form a deflection unit.
More preferably, said connecting element (C1, C2) is elastic or viscoelastic, for example a spring or a rubber rope.
The use of an elastic element connecting said further drive units (Ata, Atb, Atc, Atd) to said guided deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) and/or said first and third guided deflection devices to each other is particularly advantageous since it decouples the motor inertia from the user so that the user does not perceive the inertia of the actuators. Furthermore, the use of an elastic element as a connecting element between said first and third guided deflection devices when further drive units are present allows to influence forces with high bandwidth in all DOFs by said further drive units (Ata, Atb, Atc, Atd) acting on the deflection devices.
In another embodiment, all deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4, P1, P1′) are replaced by double deflection devices and the rope (R1, R1′) is guided twice over each pair of deflection device.
In a further embodiment, one free end of the rope (R1, R1′) is fixed to a fixed point in space.
In a preferred embodiment, the apparatus comprises a first and a second rope (R1, R1′) wherein
Preferably, the first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) are designed to be slidably connected to guiding rails.
Preferably, the apparatus of the invention further comprises at least a first guide rail running along a longitudinal axis and a second guide rail running along a longitudinal axis both extending horizontally with respect to an operating position of the apparatus, said guide rails being designed to be connected to a support structure, particularly to a support frame or to a ceiling of a room and said guide rails running parallel with respect to each other.
It is another object of the present invention a method for controlling the above disclosed apparatus, said method comprising measuring the position of the first and third deflection devices along the guide rails, measuring the forces applied on the subject (user) or the object using said apparatus, measuring the amount of rope released from each drive unit, combining this information to calculate the position of the second deflection devices (P1, P1′), and providing a feedback to said drive units so that a given reference force or position is tracked, in particular to unload the user or to apply horizontal forces.
Preferably the position of the deflection devices along the guide rails is measured, for example via optical sensors or magnetic sensors. Preferably, also the forces in the ropes R1 and R1′ and/or in the connecting elements (C1, C2) between said first and third deflection devices and/or in the ropes connecting said further drive units (Ata, Atb, Atc, Ata) to said first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) are measured, particularly by measuring deformation of an elastic or viscoelastic element (for example a linear spring or a rubber rope) connected to the ropes in series. This measurement can particularly be performed via strain gauges, wire potentiometers, optical sensing, or capacitive sensing. Preferably, also all drive units are equipped with sensors to measure the amount of rope that has been released, particularly via encoders on the actuators or on the winch axes. Using this sensor information, the resulting force and moment applied to the user is calculated by a kinematic mapping from the forces in the ropes (R1, R1′) to force vector and a moment vector in Cartesian space.
In one aspect of the invention, the force applied on the object or person is controlled in a feedback-loop in such a way that a given reference force is tracked, particularly to unload the user or to apply horizontal forces. To this end, the measured force vector is compared to the reference force vector, and the torques applied by the drive units are adjusted in such a way as to decrease the difference between these two vectors (Cartesian-space control). Alternatively, the reference force vector and the current kinematic configuration of the system can be used to calculate individual reference forces for each single rope, and the torque of each individual drive unit is adjusted in such a way as to decrease the difference between the respective reference rope force and the measured rope force (drive unit-space control). In addition or alternatively, the drive unit torques can also be applied as to achieve a given desired movement of the deflection units, particularly to keep these centered above the user.
In another aspect of the invention, the drive units are used to control a certain position of the user. All the above applies in an analog way, only that not forces but positions are controlled either in Cartesian space or in drive unit space.
Preferably, the control is split into high-frequency and low-frequency portions, whereby said drive units (Aa, Ab, Ac, Ad) control primarily low-frequency portions, and said further drive units (Ata, Atb, Atc, Atd) control primarily high-frequency portions.
Within the meaning of the present invention, the term “user” preferably refers to a human person, but may also refer to an animal or to any object that is to unload and/or move.
Preferably, said user is a subject affected by a spinal cord motor disorder, wherein for spinal cord motor disorder is intended a disorder wherein the spinal cord is damaged and locomotor and postural functions are impaired. A spinal cord motor disorder can be caused and subsequent to trauma, infection factors (for example, extrapulmonary tuberculosis), cancer diseases, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophy lateral sclerosis or stroke. More preferably, said user is a subject affected by spinal cord injury. Within the meaning of the present invention, spinal cord injury refers to any injury to the spinal cord that is caused by trauma.
Within the meaning of the present invention, the term “deflection device” means a device which guides the rope and changes its direction, particularly guiding it into the workspace.
Preferably, the first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) are passively displaceable (i.e. can change their position in space, particularly in a guided manner), which particularly means that they do not themselves comprise a movement generating means for moving the respective deflection device actively, but can be displaced by forces induced into the deflection devices via the ropes connected to the user or via drive units attached to them via additional ropes.
Preferably, the first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) are connected to each other (for instance pairwise such that the respective two deflection devices can be displaced together while maintaining a constant distance between the deflections devices along the direction of displacement), and they may be guided by a guide rail or a plurality of guide rails or may be suspended from a support structure (e.g. support frame or ceiling of a room), particularly by means of a wire or another (elongated) supporting element such that their centers of mass can (passively) change position in space. Likewise, said guide rail(s) may be connected to a support structure (e.g. support frame or ceiling).
However, in an embodiment of the invention, the deflection devices may be fixed such that they are not moving in space or along the guide rails. Particularly, the deflection devices can be designed to be fixed in a releasable manner to the guide rails so that the deflection units are temporarily lockable regarding their movement along the guide rails.
A connection between two (or even more) deflection elements can be provided by means of a (e.g. separate) connecting means (element), which may be interchangeable. Said connecting element is preferably elastic (particularly such that the restoring force is a function of the elongation of the elastic connecting element, particularly a linear function) or viscoelastic or non-elastic, so as to form a deflection unit (also denoted as trolley). Further, the respective connecting element may be a flexible rope member or a rigid rod (particularly produced out of a carbon fibre composite).
Deflection devices may also be integrally connected to each other (i.e. form a single piece).
Optionally, this connecting element can be realized via additional pulleys on either end of the rail, such that a tension spring in this connection generates forces that pushes the deflection devices apart instead of pulling them towards each other.
Each pair of first and third deflection devices (D1, D2, D3, D4) is used to guide a rope (R1, R1′) towards a freely moving, interconnected deflection device (P1, P1′).
In an embodiment of the invention, the apparatus comprises two ropes.
Preferably, the first rope extends from its first associated drive unit towards a first deflection device, is deflected by the first guided deflection device towards a second freely moving deflection device which deflects it to a third guided deflection device, preferably connected with said first deflection device, and then extends to a second associated drive unit. Likewise, the second rope extends from its first associated drive unit towards a first deflection device, is deflected by the first deflection device towards a second freely moving deflection device which deflects it to a third guided deflection device, preferably connected with said first deflection device and then extends to a second associated drive unit. The second deflection devices are connected to a common user and preferably also interconnected with each other through a common coupling point.
In another embodiment of the invention, in particular in the case of a human user, each of the second deflection devices can be connected to the respective shoulder of the user. Then the person could not rotate freely anymore, but rotation could be actuated.
Preferably, the first and third deflection devices are connected to each other on the same side to form a deflection unit, so that their combined movement is governed by (multiple) rope forces acting on them.
According to an aspect of the invention, the apparatus comprises at least a first guide rail and a second guide rail (for instance in case of two ropes), each running along a longitudinal axis. These longitudinal axes preferably extend horizontally with respect to an operating position of the apparatus, in which the apparatus can be operated (e.g. by the user) as intended. Preferably, the guide rail(s) can be connected to said support structure (e.g. support frame or ceiling of a room, in which the apparatus is arranged). In case of a support frame, the guide rail(s) may be connected to said upper frame part. Preferably, the guide rails are arranged such that they run parallel with respect to each other. Particularly, in case of two guide rails, each guide rail may be tilted about its longitudinal axis, particularly by an angle of 30° or 45° with respect to the vertical.
Preferably, the first and the third deflection device which guide a first rope are slidably connected to the first guide rail, so that they can slide along the first guide rail along the longitudinal axis of the first guide rail. In case of two ropes the first and the third deflection devices which guide a second rope are preferably slidably connected to the second guide rail, so that they can slide along the second guide rail along the longitudinal axis of the second guide rail.
In detail, said deflection devices may comprise a base (preferably in the form of a cart) slidably connecting the respective each deflection device to its associated guide rail. An arm hinged to its base can be provided for each deflection device so that each respective arm can be pivoted with respect to its base about a pivoting axis running parallel to the longitudinal axis of the respective guide rail. Each deflection device may also comprise a deflection element connected to the respective arm, for deflecting the respective rope around said deflection element. Each respective deflection element may be formed by a roller, which is rotatably supported on the respective arm, therefore the respective roller can be rotated about a rotation axis that is orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the respective guide rail. If desired, arresting means can be provided for each deflection device for arresting the respective deflection device with respect to the associated guide rail, for instance when using the apparatus with a treadmill.
The first and third deflection devices guide the rope towards the second deflection devices. Differently from the above described first and third deflection devices, the second deflection devices are freely moving. Therefore, they are not connected to a guide rail but they can freely move in the workspace. They are connected to a user and preferably also interconnected with each other, e.g. by means of karabiners, and/or through one or more common coupling points to the user. In one embodiment, said second deflection devices are connected to a user through a single common point to which, for example, a harness is attached. In an alternative embodiment, said user is a human subject and second deflection devices are connected to the user by connecting each said second deflection device to one shoulder of the subject, such that rotation about the vertical axis can be induced and controlled.
In an embodiment, the free ends of the rope(s) is(are) connected to one or more drive units applying forces to said free ends.
In one embodiment, for each rope there are two drive units applying forces on the free ends of said rope. Preferably, the first drive unit of one rope and the second drive unit of the same rope face each other along the longitudinal axis of the first guide rail, wherein the first and the third deflection unit are arranged between said first and second drive units along the longitudinal axis of the guide rail.
In a preferred embodiment, one free end of each rope is connected to a drive unit, whereas the other free end of the same rope is fixed to a fixed point in space.
In a preferred embodiment, each drive unit Ae, Ate, Af, Atf comprises an actuator 2 (for example a servo motor) which is connected to a winch, around which the respective rope is wound. A flexible coupling can be conveniently used. In this embodiment, each actuator is designed to exert a torque on the respective winch via a drive axis of the respective winch so as to retract or release the respective rope, i.e. to adjust the length of the respective rope that is unwound from the winch. If desired, each drive unit may comprise a brake for arresting the respective winch. Further, the drive unit preferably comprises at least one pressing member, for example in the form of a pressure roller pressing the respective rope being wound around the associated winch with a pre-definable pressure against the winch in order to prevent the respective rope from jumping off the associated winch or over a thread. In an alternative embodiment, the drive units are manually operated.
Optionally, a force is applied to each guided deflection device by means of further drive units.
An exemplary embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention is depicted in
The apparatus (1) comprises a suitable support structure (e.g. ceiling of the room where the apparatus is placed or a support frame—this latter not shown in
Said support structure supports a first and a second guiding rail (102, 102′). The first guide rail 102 is designed to slidably support a two deflection devices D1, D2, and the second guide rail 102′ is designed to slidably support two further deflection devices D3, D4. Here, the pair D1, D2 as well as the pair D3, D4 are connected by a connecting means C1, C2 so that the two pairs of deflection devices D1-D2 and D3-D4 each form a deflection unit (trolley) which can slide along the respective guide rail (102, 102′).
A first rope R1 extends from a first associated drive unit Ac to a first associate deflection device D3 and is deflected by D3 and guided toward a second associated deflection device P1. The rope R1 is then deflected by said second deflection device P1 toward a third deflection device D4, which is connected to said first deflection device D3 through a connecting element C1, and then extends to a second associated drive unit Ad.
Said drive units Ad, Ac apply forces Fd, Fc to the rope R1 retracting and releasing it.
A second rope R1′ extends from a first associated drive unit Aa to a first associate deflection device D1 and is deflected by D2 and guided toward a second associated deflection device P1′. The rope R1′ is deflected by said second deflection device P1′ toward a third deflection device D2, which is connected to said first deflection device D1 through a connecting element C2, and then extends to a second associated drive unit Ab.
Said drive units Aa, Ab apply forces Fa, Fb to the rope R1′ retracting and releasing it. Preferably, said connecting elements C1, C2 are elastic or viscoelastic. A damper can also be used.
Said second deflection devices P1, P1′ are coupled to a user and preferably also interconnected one with each other.
A resulting force Fn is generated which is exerted on the user via deflection devices P1, P1′. In such a way the user is partially unloaded of its weight and a force is applied on the user.
Furthermore, a force is applied to each first and third deflection device D1, D2, D3, D4 by means of further drive units Ata, Atb, Atc, Atd. In particular, drive unit Ata exerts on deflection device D1 a force Fta through rope X′. Drive unit Atb exerts on deflection device D2 a force Ftb through rope X″. Drive unit Atc exerts on deflection device D3 a force Ftc through rope X′″. Drive unit Atd exerts on deflection device D4 a force Ftd through rope X″″.
Forces Fta, Ftb, Ftc, Ftd are applied in parallel directions with respect to the guide rails.
Their combined action results in additional horizontal and/or vertical force components which modify the resulting force Fn exerted on the user.
An embodiment of the invention is represented in
In said embodiment, the free ends of each rope (R1, R1′) are interconnected so that only one rope is present.
One free end extends from a first actuated winch (drive unit) W1 to a second actuated winch (drive unit) W2 and then back to said first actuated winch W1, wherein both free ends are wound up. Each winch W1, W2 is preferably placed between the ends of the guiding rails, one facing the other.
In this embodiment, R1 and R1′ refer to each rope part extending from a first drive unit (or winch) to a second drive unit (or winch).
Preferably, the winch W1, W2 is a torque- or position-controlled winch. A torque-controlled winch provides an actuator torque that aims to decrease the difference between a given reference torque and the currently measured torque, particularly as measured from the force ensors in the ropes or calculated from current measurement of the actuator unit. A position-controlled winch provides an actuator torque that aims to decrease the difference between a reference length for the rope that is released and the actual length of rope released, particularly as measured by an encoder on the drive unit. The reference force or position is provided by a control algorithm, particularly as the one described earlier.
Typically, one of the two winches, for example W1, acts by changing the overall length of the rope while the other, for example W2, has the role of manipulating the relative lengths of the rope parts R1 and R1′.
Optionally, only one of the two winches is present, for example W1.
Similar to the previous exemplary embodiment, winch W1 apply forces Fb, Fd to the rope retracting and releasing it, while winch W2 apply forces Fa, Fc to the rope retracting and releasing it.
A 2D configuration of this same embodiment is represented in
As for the exemplary embodiment above described, forces Fta, Ftb, Ftc, Ftd are applied on the deflection devices in parallel directions with respect to the guide rails by drive units not shown in the picture.
All embodiments of the apparatus of the invention that are depicted as 2D configurations are preferably intended to be deployed in a 3D configuration as depicted in
A further embodiment of the invention is represented in
As explained above, this embodiment is intended to be realized in a three-dimensional configuration but is herein depicted on a two-dimensional configuration for ease of representation.
In this embodiment, both free ends of the rope R1 after being deflected by deflection devices D1, P1 and D2 are guided backwards, with a deflection angle >90°, over the guided deflection devices D1, D2 and then connected to motorized winches W1, W2.
Forces Fa, Fb are respectively generated on the rope by said winches W1 and W2.
The configuration is represented only for one rope or part of the rope R1 but it is intended to be the same for the other rope or part of the rope R1′.
Preferably, an elastic connecting element is also present between deflection devices D1, D2 so that said deflection devices D1, D2 are pushed apart instead of being pulled towards each other.
The advantage of this configuration is that when the force on the rope or part of the rope R1 increases, the deflection devices D1 and D2 on the same rail will move towards each other, and vice versa. That in turn reduces the difference in forces between rope or part of the rope R1 and rope or part of the rope R1′.
This is particularly advantageous, for example, when the user moves in y direction with a desired constant force Fn pointing in z direction.
For appropriately dimensioned elastic element, this can even lead to zero torque to be applied by winch W1 over a certain range of y positions, said range being between −1 m and +1 m of lateral movement. In these cases the rope parts R1, R1′ can be connected directly to each other, without using winch W1.
Preferably, in this embodiment deflection devices D1 and D2 are not fully aligned with respect to the guiding rail.
A further embodiment of the invention is represented in a 2D configuration in
This embodiment is intended to be realized in a three-dimensional configuration but is herein depicted on a two-dimensional configuration for ease of representation.
The configuration is represented only for one part of the rope R1 but it is intended to be the same for the other part of the rope R1′.
In this embodiment, all deflection devices D1, D2, P1 are replaced by double deflection devices and the rope R1 is guided twice over each pair of deflection device.
In particular, the rope R1 extends from a first winch W1 and is guided over one pair of guided deflection devices D1, then guided towards a pair of freely moving deflection device P1 and via this one guided to the third pair of deflection devices D2 guided by the same rail, then deflected by them back to D1, then again to P1, from these again to D2, and finally to the second winch W2.
One advantage of this configuration is that in a 3D configuration there are in total eight rope parts that support the load Fn thus reducing the necessary load of W2.
Further advantages are that it is easier to guide the ropes and that D1 and D2 may stay aligned, differently from the embodiment depicted in
Preferably, an elastic connecting element is present between deflection devices D1, D2 so that said deflection devices D1, D2 are pushed apart instead of being pulled towards each other.
As for the exemplary embodiment above described, forces Fta, Ftb are applied on the deflection devices in parallel directions with respect to the guide rails by drive units not shown in the picture.
A further embodiment of the invention is represented in a 2D configuration in
In this embodiment, one free end of each rope R1 is fixed at one end of each respective guiding rail.
The remaining free end is connected to a respective motorized winch W1 on the opposite end of the guiding rail, or all the free ends of each rope are connected to a joint winch W2 on the opposite end of the guiding rail.
In all the above embodiments, one drive unit (or winch) can be replaced by the fixation of one free end of the rope R1, R1′ to a fixed point (for example a wall or the end of the guiding rail).
In further embodiments of the invention a one- or bi-directional force is applied to each guided deflection device D1, D2, D3, D4 by means of further drive units Ata, Atb, Atc, Ata.
By means of these drive units, forces in parallel direction with respect to the rails are applied to the deflection devices D1, D2, D3, D4 and, therefore, to the user.
In this respect, an embodiment of the invention is represented in a 2D configuration in
An alternative embodiment is depicted in
Here, a single motorized winch W pulls on one rope R1 whose free ends are connected to the deflection devices D1, D2. Forces Fta, Ftb are thus applied on the deflection devices D1, D2.
The advantage of this configuration is that only one motor is needed instead of two to apply forces to the two guided deflection devices D1, D2.
The disadvantage is that no opposed forces can be generated on the two guided deflection devices D1, D2.
A further alternative embodiment is depicted in
Here, the deflection devices D1, D2 are directly actuated, e.g. by actuators directly attached to the carts of the deflection devices via additional ropes (not depicted in the figure). Therefore, forces Fta, Ftb are applied to the deflection devices D1, D2.
The advantage is that no winches are needed to wind up the rope attached to the deflection devices. The disadvantage is the increased mechanical complexity (guidance of actuator cables and guidance system) and the potentially increased inertia.
A further embodiment of the apparatus according to the present invention is represented in
In this embodiment, the guided deflection devices D1, D2 are connected by means of an elastic element C2.
In such a way, when opposed forces are applied on said deflection devices by the drive units, the distance between said devices changes.
For example, if four motorized winches Wi-W4 are present (only two are depicted in
If only the motorized winches on one guiding rail W1, W2 pull with about the same force, then the user is pulled towards the opposite guiding rail.
If unilateral forces with equal direction are applied to both pairs of guided deflection units D1-D2 and D3-D4, a force in x-direction is generated on the user.
If unilateral forces with opposed direction are applied to both pairs of guided deflection units D1-D2 and D3-D4, the vertical force is increased.
In an embodiment, deflection devices P1, P1′ are connected to the user through two different coupling points. In this case, if unilateral forces with opposed direction are applied to both pairs of guided deflection units D1-D2 and D3-D4, a rotation of the user about the vertical axis is induced.
In a preferred embodiment, this configuration is used together with the configuration depicted in
In this case, the influence of actuation on the deflection devices is inverted, and required actuator forces for y-actuation and z-actuation are generally reduced.
In an alternative embodiment, this configuration is used together with the configuration depicted in
Also in this case, the influence of actuation on the deflection devices is inverted, and required actuator forces for y-actuation and z-actuation are generally reduced.
The apparatus herein disclosed is also for use and in a method in restoring voluntary control of locomotion in a subject suffering from a neuromotor impairment.
Generally, the apparatus according to the present invention is for use and in a method for locomotor rehabilitation of a subject, in particular a human, suffering from locomotor impairment, as detailed in the specification.
In the unitary concept of the present invention, the apparatus of the present invention, is for the above mentioned uses, optionally in combination with a device for epidural and/or subdural electrical stimulation, and further optionally in combination with a cocktail comprising a combination of agonists to monoaminergic receptors, as disclosed for example in WO2013179230, WO2015000800.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15175238 | Jul 2015 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2016/065601 | 7/1/2016 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2017/005661 | 1/12/2017 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3653518 | Polen | Apr 1972 | A |
| 4340216 | Murphy | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4356902 | Murphy | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4402501 | Lohman | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4410175 | Shamp | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4574789 | Forster | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4784420 | Makino | Nov 1988 | A |
| 5018631 | Reimer | May 1991 | A |
| 5337908 | Beck, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5421783 | Kockelman | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5441465 | Hefner | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5601527 | Selkowitz | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5626540 | Hall | May 1997 | A |
| 5667461 | Hall | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5788606 | Rich | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5819962 | Okubo | Oct 1998 | A |
| 6139475 | Bessler | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6182843 | Tax | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6464208 | Smith | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 7780617 | Tornatore | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7861872 | Ng | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 8100815 | Balaker | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8836368 | Afshar | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 20030145759 | Rodnunsky | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20050239612 | Keiser | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060189453 | Leblond | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070004567 | Shetty | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20080287268 | Hidler | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080318733 | Osler-Weppenaar | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090312165 | Rempe | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100006737 | Colombo | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20110230808 | Lisowski | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110260126 | Willis | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120018249 | Mehr | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120168397 | Lim | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20130116604 | Morilla | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158444 | Herr | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130190143 | Greenhill | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20140087922 | Bayerlein | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100491 | Hu | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201905 | Glukhovsky | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150320632 | Vallery | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160005538 | Koyanagi | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160136477 | Bucher | May 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3830429 | Mar 1990 | DE |
| 202007015508 | Mar 2008 | DE |
| 0236976 | Sep 1987 | EP |
| 2007047852 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| 2013117750 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013179230 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2015000800 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Guyatt, G. et al., “The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure,” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 132, No. 8, Apr. 15, 1985, 5 pages. |
| Lovely, R. et al., “Effects of Training on the Recovery of Full-Weight-Bearing Stepping in the Adult Spinal Cat,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 92, No. 2, May 1986, 15 pages. |
| Barbeau, H. et al., “Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat,” Brain Research, vol. 412, No. 1, May 26, 1987, 12 pages. |
| Colgate, E. et al., “An Analysis of Contact Instability in Terms of Passive Physical Equivalents,” Proceedings of the 1989 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 14, 1989, Scottsdale, Arizona, 6 pages. |
| Wernig, A. et al., “Laufband locomotion with body weight support improved walking in persons with severe spinal cord injuries,” Paraplegia, vol. 30, No. 4, Apr. 1992, 10 pages. |
| Winter, D. et al., “An integrated EMG/biomechanical model of upper body balance and posture during human gait,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 97, Chapter 32, Available as Early as Jan. 1, 1993, 9 pages. |
| Wernig, A. et al., “Laufband Therapy Based on ‘Rules of Spinal Locomotion’ is Effective in Spinal Cord Injured Persons,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 7, No. 4, Apr. 1995, 7 pages. |
| Pratt, G. et al., “Stiffness Isn't Everything,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER '95), Jun. 30, 1995, Stanford, California, 6 pages. |
| Basso, D. et al., “MASCIS Evaluation of Open Field Locomotor Scores: Effects of Experience and Teamwork on Reliability,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 1996, 17 pages. |
| Harkema, S. et al., “Human Lumbosacral Spinal Cord Interprets Loading During Stepping,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 77, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1997, 15 pages. |
| Brosamle, C. et al., “Cells of Origin, Course, and Termination Patterns of the Ventral, Uncrossed Component of the Mature Rat Corticospinal Tract,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 386, No. 2, Sep. 22, 1997, 11 pages. |
| Kakulas, B., “A Review of the Neuropathology of Human Spinal Cord Injury with Emphasis on Special Features,” Proceedings of the Donald Munro Memorial Lecture at the American Paraplegia Society 44th Annual Conference, Sep. 9, 1998, Las Vegas, Nevada, 6 pages. |
| Hashtrudi-Zaad, K. et al., “On the Use of Local Force Feedback for Transparent Teleoperation,” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 10, 1999, Detroit, Michigan, 7 pages. |
| Kirkwood, P., “Neuronal Control of Locomotion: From Mollusc to Man—G.N. Orlovsky, T.G. Deliagina and S. Grillner. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999. ISBN 0198524056 (Hbk), 322 pp.,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 111, No. 8, Aug. 1, 2000, Published Online Jul. 17, 2000, 2 pages. |
| Pratt, J. et al., “Series elastic actuators for high fidelity force control,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 29, No. 3, Available as Early as Jan. 1, 2002, 13 pages. |
| Steward, O. et al. “False Resurrections: Distinguishing Regenerated from Spared Axons in the Injured Central Nervous System,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 459, No. 1, Apr. 21, 2003, 8 pages. |
| Pearson, K., “Generating the walking gait: role of sensory feedback,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 143, Chapter 12, Published Online Nov. 28, 2003, 7 pages. |
| Bareyre, F. et al., “The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, No. 3, Mar. 2004, Published Online Feb. 15, 2004, 9 pages. |
| Carhart, M. et al., “Epidural Spinal-Cord Stimulation Facilitates Recovery of Functional Walking Following Incomplete Spinal-Cord Injury,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 12, No. 1, Mar. 15, 2004, 11 pages. |
| Liu, J. et al., “Stimulation of the Parapyramidal Region of the Neonatal Rat Brain Stem Produces Locomotor-Like Activity Involving Spinal 5-HT7 and 5-HT2A Receptors,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 94, No. 2, Aug. 1, 2005, Published Online May 4, 2005, 13 pages. |
| Timoszyk, W. et al., “Hindlimb loading determines stepping quantity and quality following spinal cord transection,” Brain Research, vol. 1050, No. 1-2, Jul. 19, 2005, Published Online Jun. 24, 2005, 10 pages. |
| Wernig, A., “‘Ineffectiveness’ of Automated Locomotor Training,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 86, No. 12, Dec. 2005, 2 pages. |
| Nessler, J. et al., “A Robotic Device for Studying Rodent Locomotion After Spinal Cord Injury,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 13, No. 4, Dec. 12, 2005, 10 pages. |
| Reinkensmeyer, D. et al., “Tools for understanding and optimizing robotic gait training,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, vol. 43, No. 5, Aug. 2006, 14 pages. |
| Frey, M. et al., “A Novel Mechatronic Body Weight Support System,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 14, No. 3, Sep. 18, 2006, 11 pages. |
| Cai, L. et al., “Implications of Assist-As-Needed Robotic Step Training after a Complete Spinal Cord Injury on Intrinsic Strategies of Motor Learning,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, No. 41, Oct. 11, 2006, 5 pages. |
| Courtine, G. et al., “Can experiments in nonhuman primates expedite the translation of treatments for spinal cord injury in humans?,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, No. 5, May 2007, 13 pages. |
| Drew, T. et al., “Cortical mechanisms involved in visuomotor coordination during precision walking,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 57, No. 1, Jan. 2008, Published Online Aug. 22, 2007, 13 pages. |
| Edgerton, V. et al., “Training Locomotor Networks,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 57, No. 1, Jan. 2008, Published Online Sep. 16, 2007, 25 pages. |
| Kwakkel, G. et al., “Effects of Robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A Systematic Review,” Neruorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 22, No. 2, Mar. 2008, Published Online Sep. 17, 2007, 17 pages. |
| Courtine, G. et al., “Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury,” Nature Medicine, vol. 14, No. 1, Jan. 6, 2008, 6 pages. |
| Cowley, K. et al., “Propriospinal neurons are sufficient for bulbospinal transmission of the locomotor command signal in the neonatal rat spinal cord,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 586, No. 6, Mar. 15, 2008, Published Online Jan. 31, 2008, 13 pages. |
| Vallery, H. et al., “Compliant Actuation of Rehabilitation Robots,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 15, No. 3, Sep. 12, 2008, 10 pages. |
| Edgerton, V. et al., “Robotic Training and Spinal Cord Plasticity,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 78, No. 1, Jan. 15, 2009, Published Online Nov. 14, 2008, 19 pages. |
| Fuentes, R. et al., “Spinal Cord Stimulation Restores Locomotion in Animal Models of Parkinson's Disease,” Science, vol. 323, No. 5921, Mar. 20, 2009, 14 pages. |
| Musienko, P. et al., “Combinatory Electrical and Pharmacological Neuroprosthetic Interfaces to Regain Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 56, No. 11, Nov. 2009, Published Online Jul. 24, 2009, 5 pages. |
| Alto, L. et al., “Chemotropic Guidance Facilitates Axonal Regeneration and Synapse Formation after Spinal Cord Injury,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, No. 9, Sep. 2009, Published Online Aug. 2, 2009, 22 pages. |
| Courtine, G. et al., “Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, No. 10, Oct. 2009, Published Online Sep. 20, 2009, 12 pages. |
| Hagglund, M. et al., “Activation of groups of excitatory neurons in the mammalian spinal cord or hindbrain evokes locomotion,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 13, No. 2, Feb. 2010, Published Online Jan. 17, 2010, 8 pages. |
| Wessels, M. et al., “Body Weight-Supported Gait Training for Restoration of Walking in People With an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 42, No. 6, Jun. 2010, 7 pages. |
| Zorner, B. et al., “Profiling locomotor recovery: comprehensive quantification of impairments after CNS damage in rodents,” Nature Methods, vol. 7, No. 9, Sep. 2010, Published Online Aug. 15, 2010, 11 pages. |
| Ada, L. et al., “Mechanically assisted walking with body weight support results in more independent walking than assisted overground walking in non-ambulatory patients early after stroke: a systematic review,” Joumal of Physiotherapy, vol. 56, No. 3, Sep. 2010, 9 pages. |
| Duschau-Wicke, A. et al., “Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 7, No. 43, Sep. 10, 2010, 13 pages. |
| Rosenzweig, E. et al., “Extensive Spontaneous Plasticity of Corticospinal Projections After Primate Spinal Cord Injury,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 13, No. 12, Dec. 2010, Published Online Nov. 14, 2010, 19 pages. |
| Hidler, J. et al., “ZeroG: Overground gait and balance training system,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, vol. 48, No. 4, Available as Early as Jan. 1, 2011, 12 pages. |
| Musselman, K. et al., “Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Profile: A New Measure of Walking Ability,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 25, No. 3, Mar. 2011, Published Online Feb. 25, 2011, 9 pages. |
| Harkema, S. et al., “Effect of Epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study,” The Lancet, vol. 377, No. 9781, Jun. 4, 2011, Published Online May 20, 2011, 17 pages. |
| Wirz, M. et al., “Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial,” BMC Neurology, vol. 11, No. 60, May 27, 2011, 5 pages. |
| Musienko, P. et al., “Controlling specific locomotor behaviors through multidimensional monoaminergic modulation of spinal circuitries,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, No. 25, Jun. 22, 2011, 32 pages. |
| Musienko, P. et al. “Multi-system neurorehabilitative strategies to restore motor functions following severe spinal cord injury,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 235, No. 1, May 2012, Published Online Sep. 7, 2011, 10 pages. |
| Gosselin, C. et al., “On the Development of a Walking Rehabilitation Device with a Large Workspace,” Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Jun. 29, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland, 6 pages. |
| Vallery, H. et al., “Multidirectional Transparent Support for Overground Gait Training,” Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Jun. 24, 2013, Seattle, Washington, 7 pages. |
| ISA European Patent Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in Application No. PCT/EP2016/065601, dated Aug. 12, 2016, WIPO, 16 pages. |
| Sun, F. et al., “Sustained axon regeneration induced by co-deletion of PTEN and SOCS3,” Nature, vol. 480, No. 7377, Dec. 15, 2011, Published Online Nov. 6, 2011, 12 pages. |
| Von Zitzewitz, J. et al., “Use of Passively Guided Deflection Units and Energy-Storing Elements to Increase the Application Range of Wire Robots,” In Book: Cable-Driven Parallel Robots, Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Available Online Sep. 8, 2012, 18 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180193217 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
