This application is a national stage entry under 35 USC § 371(b) of PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2014/067650, filed Aug. 19, 2014, and claims the benefit of German Patent Application No. 102013217164.1, filed Aug. 28, 2013, both of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
The invention concerns an apparatus to reduce size of a light, dry, fibrous material, particularly straw.
Examples of light, dry, fibrous material are leaves, algae, bamboo, grass, straw, recycling paper and old wrappings with appropriate properties.
During manufacturing of OSSB panels (oriented structural straw board), the size reduction of straw represents an important work step. The quality of the size reduction process and the later OSSB panel quality can be evaluated based on certain criteria. The straw shall be split, i.e. strands shall be size reduced for example to half shells, so that they can be glued well and pressed densely later on and an appealing optical surface of the panel can be created. Analogously, basically all closed structures of the material, for example nodes of the strands, shall be opened or split by means of the size reduction process. At the same time, despite the size reduction, the length of the straw and the fibrous structure shall be preserved as much as possible for optical and mechanical reasons. For similar reasons, a possibly small fines portion of is sought.
During manufacturing of shaped piece made of synthetic resin densified wood, which are for example known under the trade names Delignit, Dehonit, Lignostone and Werzalit, similar requirements are made like for the manufacturing of OSSB panels. Therefore, the light, dry, fibrous material, particularly straw, within the meaning of the present application, could also be used for the manufacturing of shaped pieces following the synthetic resin densified wood process, if the mentioned requirements are met.
Refiners with a commonly cylindrical shaped grinding tool, wherein material is continuously grinded or rubbed over its rotating surface, can be basically used to reduce size of straw. However, the high split rate is opposed by a high fines portion and a sufficient length and fibrous structure of the straw cannot be obtained by means of size reduction with a refiner.
A process and an apparatus for the size reduction of light, dry, fibrous materials, particularly straw, are known from the German patent application 10 2013 206 275.3. The therein disclosed apparatus reduces size of the straw in a way that due to centrifugal forces the straw moves radially outward along a beating bar fixed to an impeller. Radial to the beating bar there is a gap provided towards a beating edge. The beating bar and the beating edge are particularly realized by means of simple wear plates. The radial moving straw hit the beating edge and gets split and size reduced due to the collision. Strands of the straw can be split by this apparatus and process to a major portion into half shells. However, the disclosed apparatus and process cannot split the nodes of the straw to a major portion, which usually appear with a distance of about 120 mm in the strands and have a comparatively high strength. The size reduced material is therefore not optimal suitable for use manufacturing high quality OSSB panels.
The underlying problem of the invention is to provide a further developed apparatus to reduce size of light, dry, fibrous materials, particularly straw, which can reduce the size of material in a more appropriate way.
An apparatus configured to reduce size of a light, dry, fibrous material as provided in this application serves to solve the problem.
The problem is solved by means of an apparatus to reduce size of a light, dry, fibrous material, particularly straw, with a material supply area, an impeller and a material release area for the size reduced material as well as a ring element, which is arranged with a distance to the impeller. At least one size reduction tool is arranged at the impeller and/or at the ring element. The size reduction tool is provided angular shaped, particularly L-shaped, or has the shape of a polygonal, particularly ashlar-formed, hollow profile or solid profile.
A size reduction tool with angular shape, particularly L-shape, or with the shape of a polygonal, particularly ashlar-formed, hollow profile or solid profile enables to provide two surfaces, wherein a first surface can reduce size of the material by means of beating and a second surface by means of grinding.
Usually, a skilled person would not dimension an even plate, as applied in already known apparatuses for reduce size of materials, thicker than necessary for the required mechanical strength. An increased thickness means higher material consumption, higher weight and larger constructed space needs. But exactly that bigger extensiveness or plate thickness than necessary for the strength would be required to provide the second surface, which is able to reduce size of material by means of grinding within the meaning of the present invention.
Beating means one-time hit, crash or bounce under high kinetic energy. For beating it is not relevant, whether a moved body hit a still standing body, a move in the same direction at different speed cause the hit or move in opposite directions of two bodies are the reason for a collision.
Grinding means, that a size reduction occurs within a gap between two opposite surfaces, wherein both grinding surfaces move relative to each other. If the surfaces are even, the size reduction is facilitated by rubbing, shearing and/or squeezing. If one or both surfaces provide a side-face with a multiplicity of hollows and/or protrusions, the size reduction will be caused in addition by means of continuous, multiple hits. Such a continuous, multiple hitting within a coherent side-face is no beating within the meaning of the present invention.
Thus, a size reduction tool with angular shape or with the shape of a polygonal hollow profile or solid profile can reduce size of material more appropriately, so that a major portion of solid fibrous structures are reliably split. During processing of straw, split rates of the nodes in the straw of over 50%, regularly over 75% or even above 90% can be achieved.
A size reduction tool with angular shape is notably saving material. With an L-shape, not only material can be saved, but also a space-saving connecting device to the impeller or ring element can be provided. A hollow profile is also notably material saving. A solid profile can be manufactured with few production expenses.
In one embodiment, a leg of the angular shaped size reduction tool is connected to the impeller or ring element and a second leg is connected to the first leg, wherein particularly the second leg is facing a shearing area between impeller and ring element.
A size reduction tool can hereby be manufactured with notably little volume and material.
In one embodiment, the ring element is rotatable. By means of a rotatable ring element, a notably high relative shearing speed between impeller and ring element can be generated.
In one embodiment, a leg of the angular shaped size reduction tool or a side of the polygonal profile extend at least substantially tangentially to the ring element or to the impeller. The leg or the side is facing a shearing area between impeller and ring element.
A shearing area is the area between impeller and ring element, in which a shearing motion is usually produced by an opposing relative motion between impeller and ring element.
At least substantially tangentially to the ring element or to the impeller means that a body is aligned in or angular to a tangent plane.
By means of the at least substantially tangential alignment of the leg of the angular shaped size reduction tool or the shearing area facing side of the polygonal profile, a size reduction tool with a first surface for beating the material and a second surface for grinding the material can be provided in notably simple manner.
In one embodiment, the at least substantially tangentially extend of the leg, i.e. leg length, or the side, i.e. side length, is chosen in a way that during size reduction of straw as material, nodes of the straw can be split to a portion bigger than 50%, preferably bigger than 75%, especially preferably bigger than 90% and at the same time an average length of the size reduced straw of bigger than 50 mm, preferably bigger than 75 mm, especially preferably bigger than 90 mm can be obtained.
This embodiment is based on the leading thought that at a too short chosen extend or length, a too little portion of nodes can be split, whereas at a too big chosen extend, the straw will be cut in too short strands. A length of the leg or the side, which can achieve an appropriate size reduction of material, enables the elimination of further following processing steps such as the screening of non split nodes after the size reduction process, and therefore the manufacturing of high quality panels with notably little production expense.
In one embodiment, the at least substantially tangentially extend of the leg, respectively leg length, or the side, respectively side length, is bigger than the smaller value of 30 mm or arc length of 3° angle, preferably 45 mm or arc length of 4.5° angle, especially preferably 60 mm or arc length of 6° angle, and/or smaller than the bigger value of 180 mm or arc length of 18° angle, preferably 130 mm or arc length of 13° angle, especially preferably 80 mm or arc length of 8° angle. The arc length refers herein to the outer circumference of the impeller or the inner circumference of the ring element.
Experiments have shown that by means of a size reduction tool with above described leg length or side length, high qualitative panels can be provided with notably little manufacturing expense.
In one embodiment, a leg or a side of the size reduction tool form an acute angle with a tangent.
Through applying an acute angle, it can be prevented that a high fines portion is generated and that the material is cut excessively in length, such that for example a notably short straw strand length is obtained.
In one embodiment, a distance in circumferential direction is provided between two size reduction tools at the impeller or between two size reduction tools at the ring element, which is equal or bigger than a at least substantially tangentially extend of the leg, respectively leg length, or the side, respectively side length, of the size reduction tool.
By means of the above described distance between two size reduction tools, a notably reliable material flow in direction of the material release area is enabled.
In one embodiment, the size reduction tool at the impeller has a front edge of an at least substantially tangentially extend of the leg or the side, wherein the front edge is arranged in rotation direction and in parallel or angular to an axis of the impeller.
By means of the above described arrangement and alignment of the front edge, a notably effective size reduction of material, particularly splitting of straw, can be achieved.
In one embodiment, the at least substantially tangentially extend of the leg or the side produce an acute angle with a tangent plane through the above described front edge. A minimum gap width between impeller and ring element during a relative shearing motion can thus be defined by the front edge, and a high fines portion as well as an excessively high shortening of the material length can be prevented.
In one embodiment, the size reduction tool provides at the impeller a front edge in rotation direction of the impeller and a back edge at the opposite end of the at least substantially tangentially extend of the leg or the side, wherein the radius of the back edge to an axis of the impeller is equal or smaller than the radius of the front edge to the axis of the impeller. The front edge can in particular correspond to the front edge according to one of the previous described embodiments. Preferably, the front edge and the back edge are facing a shearing area between impeller and ring element.
By means of the equal or smaller radius of the back edge compared to the front edge, it can be achieved that a minimum gap width, which is defined by the front edge, can remain nearly constant or at least cannot fall below it over the whole at least substantially tangentially extend of the size reduction tool during a relative shearing motion. An appropriate splitting of the material, particularly hard, closed fibrous structures, for example nodes in straw, can be obtained without excessive increase of the fines portion.
In one embodiment, a L-shaped size reduction tool with a first leg and a second leg is arranged angularly to a tangent plane. By means of a suitable, L-shaped size reduction tool, a size reduction apparatus can be provided with notably low manufacturing expense, which although can enable an at least nearly constant gap width during one turn of the impeller.
Favorable is a radial orientation of the first leg in order to maximize the beating force and to work against a fast material flow to the second leg and therewith a short grinding period.
In one embodiment, a size reduction tool is arranged each at the impeller and the ring element, particularly, wherein preferably the size reduction tool at the ring element is arranged relative to the orientation of the size reduction tool at the impeller 180° rotated around the axis of the impeller or ring element.
Through the application of a size reduction tool at the impeller and at the ring element, notably high efficiency and effectiveness of an appropriate size reduction process can be achieved.
In one embodiment, the at least substantially tangentially extend of the leg or the side provides a side-face at the surface that faces the shearing area, which particularly has saw teeth or notches in polygon shape, preferably rectangle shape, or rounded notches, preferably with U-shape or semicircle. As optional, the notches can be aligned radially, at least substantially radially or angular to radial direction and/or in parallel or angular to an axis of the impeller.
A side-face has in contrast to a smooth surface protrusions and/or hollows, which regularly form a repetitive pattern.
By means of a side-face particularly in the above described manner, respectively shape, a notably effective and efficient size reduction can be obtained.
In one embodiment, a side-face with the described shapes of the previous embodiment is arranged at an at least substantially radially extend in direction of a relative sharing motion between impeller and ring element. By providing a side-face at an at least substantially radially extend, a notably effective and efficient size reduction is enabled.
In one embodiment, the size reduction tool is featured as one-piece body, particularly as a metal casting part, preferably made of Ni-hard material. A one-piece size reduction tool can be manufactures with notably little expense, particularly through metal casting methods. Ni-hard is a special low wear material, which is well suitable for production with metal casting methods.
In one embodiment, the size reduction tool is part of a tool module, which connects the size reduction tool either with the impeller or with the ring element, wherein a tool module particularly comprises only one size reduction tool. Thanks to the fact that the size reduction tool is part of a tool module, the size reduction tool can be changed with notably little effort. Furthermore, different side-faces of size reduction tools can be notably easily varied and combined in order to enable a notably effective and efficient size reduction process and thereby adaptation to the material characteristics.
In one embodiment, a minimum gap width between impeller and ring element is adjustable, particularly by means of the relative position between the size reduction tool and a tool unit of a tool module, which is preferably detachably connected with the impeller or the ring element.
Thanks to the adjustability of the minimum gap width, a notably appropriate size reduction of materials can be enabled.
By means of the particularly detachable tool unit of the tool module, a notably fast and little effort adjustment, for example at an external station, can be enabled.
In one embodiment, there is arranged at the impeller and the ring element each at least one tool module or at least one size reduction tool, wherein preferably the tool modules or the size reduction tools are identical in construction. By the use of a tool module or size reduction tool for the apparatus to reduce size of material, which are arranged at the impeller or the ring element, the number of different parts can be reduced and an apparatus to reduce size of material can be provided with notably little production expense. Particularly when using tool modules or size reduction tools that are identical in construction, the apparatus to reduce size of material can be manufactured with notably little expense.
As optional, tool modules with size reduction tools that are not identical in construction can be applied when using a base body of the tool module with exchangeable size reduction tool as part of the tool module at the ring element or impeller, wherein the base body is particularly not identical in construction, and wherein the size reduction tools that are not identical in construction preferably differ in the side-face surface that faces the shearing area. By means of the combination of different size reduction tools with preferably different side-face surfaces, a notably effective and efficient size reduction can be achieved in an appropriate manner.
In one embodiment, the size reduction tool of one of the above described embodiments does not provide a sharp edge or knife for cutting. Through the abandonment of a sharp edge or knife, notably little manufacturing expense for the size reduction tool can be enabled.
In one embodiment, the apparatus to reduce size of material is a ring flaker, disk flaker, rotor flaker and cylinder flaker. Through the combination of the above embodiments with a ring flaker, disk flaker, rotor flaker and cylinder flaker, a notably effective size reduction of the materials can be achieved.
According to a further aspect of the invention, the above described tool module comprises a size reduction tool, which has no angular shape, but a side-face as described above. A surface in rotation direction has then in at least substantially radial direction only the expansion of the side-faces plus the necessary material thickness for the strength of the size reduction tool. Beating and grinding is then also rudimentally possible, but with less effectivity and efficiency. Nevertheless, notably little expense suffices for producing the apparatus.
The invention will be described in more detail based on exemplary embodiments as shown in the
a, b, c: Side-face variants of the size reduction tool.
The exemplary embodiments as shown in the figures illustrate a size reduction machine for splitting straw for manufacturing OSSB panels, other panels made of long fibrous straw or shaped pieces made by the synthetic resin densified wood process such as table plates, chairs and other decorative products.
The straw moves from a material supply area 1 to the impeller 2, which rotates around the axis 8 during operations (
Depending on the required specifications of the size reduced straw, there can be arranged 1 to 50 tool modules 10 or size reduction tools 6 over the circumference of the impeller 2 and/or the ring element 4 with equal distance between each other. Preferably, 4 to 20 tool modules 10 or size reduction tools 6 are placed on the impeller and 12 to 30 tool modules 10 or size reduction tools 6 are placed on the ring element 4. By means of the distances between the tool modules 10 or the size reduction tools 6 in circumferential direction, a notably reliable removal of the size reduced material can be achieved. The diameter of the impeller 2 and/or the ring element 4 are in the range of 800 to 2000 mm depending on machine type. If the machine is bigger dimensioned and has bigger diameter, then a corresponding higher amount of tool modules 10 or size reduction tools 6 at the impeller 2 and/or ring element 4 are to be provided.
The size reduction tool 6 as in the
The
The
The tangential leg 11 forms an acute angle with the tangent 13, wherein the angular point is formed by the shearing area 3 facing front edge 15 of the tangential leg in rotation direction or respectively the direction of the relative shearing motion.
The acute angle 14 is chosen in the exemplary embodiments of the
In
The
The size reduction tool 6 in
The size reduction tools 6 as shown in the other figures are one-piece made of Ni-hard material via metal casting methods. By means of all the shown exemplary embodiments, a split rate of straw and the nodes of at least 90% can be achieved at simultaneous retention of an average straw length of at least 90 mm. The minimum gap width 9 is regularly between 4 to 16 mm, preferably between 8 to 10 mm, depending on the properties of the straw.
The size reduction tool 6 as in
The
A tool unit 21 of the tool module 10 as a protrusion for generating a form fit with the guiding notch 20 of the supporting means 19, wherein the protrusion is designed in a way that motion in longitudinal direction of the guiding notch 20 is possible. The tool unit 21 further provides a drill hole, in which a screw can be inserted in order to connect the size reduction tool 6 with the tool unit 21 in a force-fit manner. The size reduction tool 6 therefore also provides a drill hole, namely in form of a particularly radial oriented oblong hole 22. By means of the oblong hole 22, the radial position of the size reduction tool 6 can be notably easily and flexibly adjusted. In a further embodiment, which is not shown, the size reduction tool 6 provides a drill hole and the tool unit 21 has the oblong hole.
A clamping plate 23 connects the tool unit 21 with connected size reduction tool 6 to the supporting means 19 by means of a screw connection.
Therefore, a force-fit and form-fit connection is obtained, which is notably easily detachable.
By means of the tool unit 21 of the tool module 10 it can be achieved that an adjustment of the minimum gap width 9 can be conducted not at the impeller 2 or ring element 4, but notably efficient and with little effort at a separated adjustment station, which is not shown in the figures.
Preferably, the screw connection between size reduction tool 6 and tool unit 21 is chosen in a way that the head of the screw is arranged at the side of the size reduction tool 6 and has such a big circumference that at any adjustment, the oblong hole is covered by the head of the screw. Contamination of the oblong hole through entering materials can thus notably reliably be avoided.
In particular, a light, dry, fibrous material comprises reed, respectively cane.
In particular, a light, dry, fibrous material comprises haulms, strands or fibers from sweet grass such as rice or rice straw, corn, wheat, barley, millet, oat, rye or cattail.
In particular, a light, dry, fibrous material comprises jute, cannabis, flax, kenaf, palm frond or sisal.
In particular, a light, dry, fibrous material comprises coco, soybean, bamboo, peanut shells, light weight wood, cotton, respectively cotton plant or wool.
In particular, a light dry, fibrous material comprises textile waste, vegetable waste, paper waste or other light, dry fibrous waste products.
In particular, with the expression “straw” in the above description and the claims are also meant other lignocellulosic materials with straw-like structure such as reed and rice straw.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2013 217 164 | Aug 2013 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/067650 | 8/19/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/028354 | 3/5/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
702426 | Hennessey | Jun 1902 | A |
2338373 | Aurig | Jan 1944 | A |
2747803 | Hanse | May 1956 | A |
3082962 | Parten | Mar 1963 | A |
3411724 | Noe | Nov 1968 | A |
3549093 | Pallmann | Dec 1970 | A |
3680797 | Covey | Aug 1972 | A |
3873034 | Iwahori | Mar 1975 | A |
3917175 | Maeda | Nov 1975 | A |
4061281 | Gundlach et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4325516 | Ismar | Apr 1982 | A |
4360168 | Peterson, Jr. | Nov 1982 | A |
4406409 | Durek | Sep 1983 | A |
4479613 | Rowledge | Oct 1984 | A |
4702426 | Citterio | Oct 1987 | A |
4930710 | Hench | Jun 1990 | A |
5009371 | Nickel | Apr 1991 | A |
5062575 | Barnabie | Nov 1991 | A |
5083713 | Kanda | Jan 1992 | A |
5419499 | Bourne | May 1995 | A |
5564635 | Terada et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
6435433 | Hesch | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6533200 | Paper | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6926215 | Elliott | Aug 2005 | B2 |
8789785 | Lelas | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9174220 | Lucas | Nov 2015 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102013206275.3 | Oct 2014 | DE |
03-032755 | Feb 1991 | JP |
06-093585 | Apr 1994 | JP |
08-284084 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07-189152 | Jul 1995 | JP |
08-215595 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2003-112070 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001-334159 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2012013653 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2014166797 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/067650, dated Nov. 3, 2014, 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/067650, dated Mar. 1, 2016, 10 pages. |
Notification of Reason for Refusal for Application JP 2016-515977, dated Nov. 22, 2016, 6 pages (English Translation of same, 5 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160199843 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |