Patent Grant
9033048
1. Technical Field
Embodiments of the subject matter disclosed herein generally relate to methods and apparatuses useable in drilling installations for determining a wellbore influx condition using qualitative indications.
2. Discussion of the Background
During drilling operations, gas, oil or other well fluids at a high pressure may flow from the drilled formations into the wellbore created during the drilling process. An unplanned influx from the formation into the wellbore is referred to in the industry as a “kick” and may occur at unpredictable moments. If the fluid influx is not promptly controlled, the well, the equipment in the well, and the drilling vessel is at risk. In order to protect the well and/or the equipment at risk, an assembly of valves called blow-out preventers, or BOPs, are located and actuated to contain the fluids in the wellbore upon detection of such events or indications of imminence of such events.
A traditional offshore oil and gas drilling configuration 10, as illustrated in
Inside the riser 30, as illustrated in the cross-section view A-A′, there is a drill string 32 at the end of which a drill bit (not shown) may be rotated to extend the subsea well through layers below the seabed 50. Mud is circulated from a mud tank (not shown) on the drilling platform 20 inside the drill string 32 to the drill bit, and returned to the drilling platform 20 through an annular space 34 between the drill string 32 and a casing 36 of the riser 30. The mud maintains a hydrostatic pressure to counter-balancing the pressure of fluids in the formation being drilled and cools the drill bit while also transporting the cuttings generated in the drilling process to the surface. At the surface, the mud returning from the well is filtered to remove the cuttings, and re-circulated.
A blowout preventer (BOP) stack 60 is located close to the seabed 50. The BOP stack may include a lower BOP stack 62 attached to the wellhead 40, and a Lower Marine Riser Package (“LMRP”) 64, which is attached to a distal end of the riser 30. During drilling, the lower BOP stack 62 and the LMRP 64 are connected.
A plurality of blowout preventers (BOPs) 66 located in the lower BOP stack 62 or in the LMRP 64 are in an open state during normal operation, but may be closed (i.e., switched in a close state) to interrupt a fluid flow through the riser 30 when a “kick” event occurs. Electrical cables and/or hydraulic lines 70 transport control signals from the drilling platform 20 to a controller 80 that is located on the BOP stack 60. The controller 80 controls the BOPs 66 to be in the open state or in the close state, according to signals received from the platform 20 via the electrical cables and/or hydraulic lines 70. The controller 80 also acquires and sends to the platform 20, information related to the current state (open or closed) of the BOPs. The term “controller” used here covers the well known configuration with two redundant pods.
Traditionally, as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,395,878, 7,562,723, and 7,650,950 (the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein), a mud flow output from the well is measured at the surface of the water. The mud flow and/or density input into the well may be adjusted to maintain a pressure at the bottom of the well within a targeted range or around a desired value, or to compensate for kicks and fluid losses.
The volume and complexity of conventional equipment employed in the mud flow control are a challenge in particular due to the reduced space on a platform of an offshore oil and gas installation.
Another problem with the existing methods and devices is the relative long time (e.g., tens of minutes) between a moment when a disturbance of the mud flow occurs at the bottom of the well and when a change of the mud flow is measured at the surface. Even if information indicating a potential disturbance of the mud flow is received from the controller 80 faster, a relatively long time passes between when an input mud flow is changed and when this change has a counter-balancing impact at the bottom of the well.
Operators of oil and gas installations try to maintain an equivalent circulating density (ECD) at the bottom of a well close to a set value. The ECD is a parameter incorporating both the static pressure and the dynamic pressure. The static pressure depends on the weight of the fluid column above the measurement point, and, thus, of the density of the mud therein. The density of the mud input into the well via the drill string 32 may be altered by crushed rock or by fluid and gas emerging from the well. The dynamic pressure depends on the flow of fluid. Control of the mud flow may compensate for the variation of mud density due to these causes. U.S. Pat. No. 7,270,185 (the entire content of which is incorporated by reference herein) discloses methods and apparatuses operating on the return mud path, below the water surface, to partially divert or discharge the mud returning to the surface when the ECD departs from a set value.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/050,164 proposes a solution of these problems in which a parameter proportional with a mud flow emerging from the wellbore is measured and used for controlling the outflow. However, accurately assessing the emerging mud flow is a challenge in itself because, unlike the mud pumped into the well, the emerging mud may not have a uniform composition. The emerging mud may sometimes (not always) contain formation cuttings or gas. This lack of uniformity in the mud composition affects the density or a mass balance. Additionally the drill string may be moving eccentrically inside the casing affecting measurement of the parameter proportional with the emerging mud flow. The mud may not be conductive enough to use magnetic parameters. Accurate ultrasonic parameter measurement may be impeded by mud's viscosity.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide methods and devices useable in offshore drilling installations near the actual wellhead for early detection of kick events or detecting indications of an imminence of a kick event, thereby overcoming the afore-described problems and drawbacks.
Some embodiments set forth herewith detect imminent or ongoing kicks by monitoring the evolution (i.e., a sequence of values corresponding to successive moments) of the mud flow into the well versus the evolution of the mud flow coming out of the well. An accurate measurement of the return mud flow is not necessary or sought, instead using qualitative indications of variation of the return mud flow. Thus, the embodiments overcome the difficulty of achieving an exact measurement of the return mud flow and the delay of measuring the return mud flow at the surface.
According to one exemplary embodiment, an apparatus useable in an offshore drilling installation having a mud loop into a well drilled below the seabed is provided. The apparatus includes a first sensor configured to measure a input mud flow pumped into the well, and a second sensor configured to measure a variation of a return mud flow emerging from the well. The apparatus further includes a controller connected to the first sensor, and to the second sensor. The controller is configured to identify an ongoing or imminent kick event based on monitoring and comparing an evolution of the input mud flow as measured by the first sensor and an evolution of the return mud flow as inferred based on measurements received from the second sensor.
According to another embodiment, a method of manufacturing an offshore drilling installation is provided. The method includes providing a first sensor configured to measure a input mud flow pumped into the well, and a second sensor configured to measure a variation of a return mud flow emerging from the well. The method further includes connecting a controller to the first sensor and to the second sensor, the controller being configured to identify an ongoing or imminent kick event based on monitoring comparatively an evolution of the input mud flow as measured by the first sensor and an evolution of the return mud flow as inferred based on measurements received from the second sensor.
According to another embodiment, a method of identifying an ongoing or imminent kick event in an offshore drilling installation having a mud loop into a well drilled below the seabed is provided. The method includes receiving) measurements from a first sensor configured to measure an input mud flow pumped into the well and a second sensor configured to measure a variation of a return mud flow emerging from the well. The method further includes, based on the received measurements, monitoring and comparing an evolution of the input mud flow and an inferred evolution of for the return mud flow, to identify the ongoing or imminent kick event. The ongoing or imminent kick is identified (1) when the return mud flow increases while the input mud flow pumped into the well is substantially constant, or (2) when the return mud flow remains substantially constant or increases while the input mud flow pumped into the well decreases. The identification of the kick event takes into consideration a delay between a normal increase or decrease of the input mud flow pumped into the well and the variation of the return mud flow caused by the normal increase or decrease of the input mud flow pumped into the well.
A final embodiment includes the previously mentioned embodiments and adds another sensor (pressure, temperature, density, etc.) but that is NOT a flow measurement that can be used as a confirming indicator that an influx has occurred. The controller would take the input from the flow sensors, discern that a kick is occurring from flow measurements, and then poll the additional sensor to confirm that an event has occurred.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments and, together with the description, explain these embodiments. In the drawings:
The following description of the exemplary embodiments refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings identify the same or similar elements. The following detailed description does not limit the invention. Instead, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims. The following embodiments are discussed, for simplicity, with regard to the terminology and structure of a drilling installation having a mud loop. However, the embodiments to be discussed next are not limited to these systems, but may be applied to other systems that require monitoring a fluid flow at a location far from the fluid source.
Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the subject matter disclosed. Thus, the appearance of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout the specification is not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
The apparatus 100 includes a first sensor 110 configured to measure the input mud flow pumped into the well. The first sensor 110 may be a stroke counter connected to a fluid pump (not shown) that provides the input mud flow into the input fluid path 101. Due to the uniformity of the density and other physical properties of the mud input into the well, various known flow measuring methods may be employed. The input flow measurement may be performed at the surface.
The apparatus 100 further includes a second sensor 120 configured to detect a variation of the return mud flow. In other words, accuracy of a flow measurement is not required for the second sensor. The second sensor 120 is preferably configured to detect the variation of the return mud flow near the seabed in order to avoid delays due to the time necessary for the return mud flow to travel to a detection site, towards the surface. In an exemplary embodiment, the second sensor may be a flow measuring device. In another exemplary embodiment, the second sensor may be a pressure sensor. In another exemplary embodiment, the second sensor may be an electromagnetic sensor monitoring impedance of the return mud flow or an acoustic sensor monitoring acoustic impedance of the return mud flow. The second sensor may be a combination of sensors which, while none by itself can provide a reliable basis for estimating the return mud flow, but when sensor indications are combined according to predetermined rules, they may provide a measurement indicating a variation of the return mud flow rate.
The apparatus 100 further includes a controller 130 connected to the first sensor 110, and to the second sensor 120. The controller 130 is configured to identify an ongoing or imminent kick event based on monitoring and comparing the evolution of the input mud flow as measured by the first sensor and the evolution of the return mud flow as inferred based on measurements received from the second sensor. The controller 130 may be located close to the seabed (e.g., as part of the BOP stack 60). Alternatively, the controller 130 may be located at the surface (e.g., on the platform 20). The controller 130 may be configured to generate an alarm signal upon identifying the ongoing or imminent kick event. This alarm signal may trigger closing of the BOPs.
The apparatus 100 may further include a third sensor 140 connected to the controller 130 and configured to provide measurements related to the drilling, to the controller 130. The controller 130 may confirm that the ongoing or imminent kick event has occurred based on the measurements received from the third sensor 140, before generating the alarm signal alerting, for example, the operator (i.e., the user) that a kick has likely occurred. The third sensor 140 may (1) detect an acoustic event, or “sound” of the kick event, or (2) detect flow using a different technique than the second sensor, or (3) detect a density change in the fluid, or (4) detect a sudden temperature change due to the influx. The third sensor 140 could be located in the BOP or even in the drill string near the formation, provided there is a transmission method (wired drill pipe or pulse telemetry) to get the measurements from this third sensor to the controller 130.
In the graph illustrated in
At 220, fluid starts being input into the well (e.g., mud pumps on the rig are powered and stroke counters start providing a measure of the input mud flow pumped towards the well). In response to this normal increase of the input mud flow at 220, the return mud flow starts increasing at 221. The interval between 221 and 222 represents a delay between the normal increase of the input mud flow pumped into the well and the variation (increase) of the return mud flow caused by this normal increase. The input flow increases until it reaches a nominal (operational) value. The output flow is estimated based on the detected variation thereof. The variation may be in fact a derivative of a measurement with relative low accuracy of the output flow. A difference 223 between the input flow and the output flow is not significant in itself but its evolution may be used for identifying an ongoing or imminent kick event.
If while the input flow remains constant, the output flow increases as illustrated by the curve labeled 224, the controller identifies that a kick event has occurred or is imminent. If while the input flow remains constant, the output flow decreases as illustrated by the curve labeled 225, the controller may identify that return circulation has been lost.
At 226, the input flow is cutoff (e.g., the mud pumps on the rig are powered off). In response to this normal decrease of the input mud flow, the return mud flow also starts decreasing at 227. The delay (lag) between the normal decrease of the input mud flow pumped into the well and the variation (decrease) of the return mud flow caused by this normal decrease labeled 228 is substantially the same as the delay labeled 222. If in spite of the decreasing input mud flow the return mud flow increases as illustrated by curves labeled 229 and 230, the controller identifies that a kick event has occurred (i.e., is ongoing) or is imminent.
Thus, the controller 130 monitors and compares the evolution of the input mud flow as measured by the first sensor and an evolution of the return mud flow as inferred (i.e., estimated) based on measurements received from the second sensor, in order to identify an ongoing or imminent kick event.
The controller 130 or/and the sensors may transmit measurements related to monitoring the input mud flow and the return mud flow to an operator interface located at the surface, so that an operator may visualize the evolution of the input flow and/or of the return mud flow.
Any of the embodiments of the apparatus may be integrated into the offshore installations. A flow diagram of a method 300 for manufacturing an offshore drilling installation having a mud loop into a well drilled below the seabed, to be capable to detect a kick event without accurately measuring the return mud flow, is illustrated in
In one embodiment, the method may also include connecting the controller to blowout preventers of the installation to trigger closing thereof upon receiving an alarm signal generated by the controller to indicate indentifying the ongoing or imminent kick event. In another embodiment, the method may further include connecting the controller to an operator interface located at the surface, to transmit measurements received from the first sensor and from the second sensor.
A flow diagram of a method 400 of identifying an ongoing or imminent kick event in an offshore drilling installation having a mud loop into a well drilled below the seabed is illustrated in
In one embodiment, the method may further include generating an alarm signal upon identifying the ongoing or imminent kick event. In another embodiment, the method may further include transmitting the measurements received from the first sensor and from the second sensor to an operator interface located at the surface.
The method may also further include filtering out fluctuations in time and/or in magnitude of the return mud flow, if the fluctuations are below predetermined respective thresholds or extracting trends in the evolution of the input mud flow pumped into the well and in the evolution of the return mud flow.
The disclosed exemplary embodiments provide apparatuses and methods for an offshore installation in which the evolution of the input mud flow is compared to the evolution of the return mud flow inferred from qualitative indications to identify kick events. It should be understood that this description is not intended to limit the invention. On the contrary, the exemplary embodiments are intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which are included in the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Further, in the detailed description of the exemplary embodiments, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of the claimed invention. However, one skilled in the art would understand that various embodiments may be practiced without such specific details.
Although the features and elements of the present exemplary embodiments are described in the embodiments in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone without the other features and elements of the embodiments or in various combinations with or without other features and elements disclosed herein.
This written description uses examples of the subject matter disclosed to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the same, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the subject matter is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3550697 | Hobhouse | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3595075 | Dower | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3646808 | Leonard | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3740739 | Griffin et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3760891 | Gadbois | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3790930 | Lamel et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3809170 | Ilfrey et al. | May 1974 | A |
| 3955411 | Lawson, Jr. | May 1976 | A |
| 3976148 | Maus et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3994166 | Dower | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4091881 | Maus | May 1978 | A |
| 4208906 | Roberts, Jr. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4224988 | Gibson et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4250974 | Heilhecker et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4282939 | Maus et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4440239 | Evans | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4520665 | Cordier et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4527425 | Stockton | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4553429 | Evans et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4562560 | Kamp | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4733232 | Grosso | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4733233 | Grosso et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4813495 | Leach | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4867254 | Gavignet | Sep 1989 | A |
| 5006845 | Calcar et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5055837 | Abdallah et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5070949 | Gavignet | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5154078 | Codazzi | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5163029 | Bryant | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5168932 | Worrall et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5205165 | Jardine et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5214251 | Orban et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5222048 | Grosso et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 6257354 | Schrader et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6415877 | Fincher et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6484816 | Koederitz | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6668943 | Maus et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6820702 | Niedermayr et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 7011155 | Meister et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7185719 | van Riet | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7228902 | Oppelt | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7270185 | Fontana et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7278496 | Leuchtenberg | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7395878 | Reitsma et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7497266 | Fossli | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7562723 | Reitsma | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7650950 | Leuchtenberg | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7770663 | Mathiszik | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7984770 | Sehsah | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8457897 | Hehmeyer | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 20010050185 | Calder et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020066597 | Schubert et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20030127230 | von Eberstein, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168258 | Koederitz | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040040746 | Niedermayr et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20080066905 | Aivalis et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080105434 | Orbell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123470 | Cooper et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20090025930 | Iblings et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20100018715 | Orbell et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100071794 | Homan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211423 | Hehmeyer | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110042076 | Reitsma | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20120273218 | Orbell et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2435026 | Nov 2011 | RU |
| 887803 | Dec 1981 | SU |
| 2006118920 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,164, filed Mar. 17, 2011, entitled “Mudline Managed Pressure Drilling and Enhanced Influx Detection.” |
| Search Report from corresponding EA Application No. 201201642, dated Apr. 17, 2013. |
| EP Search Report dated Apr. 3, 2013 from corresponding EP Application No. 12197655.9. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130168100 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
