The present invention is related to the field of operating systems. More specifically, the present invention relates to apparatuses, systems and methods of switching operating systems.
A computing device is typically controlled by an operating system, such as Microsoft Windows®. As more and more computing devices become prevalent, so are the operating systems (OS) that control these computing devices. Examples of an operating system include, but are not limited to, UNIX®, Mac® OS X, Linux®, Android®, BlackBerry® OS, iOS®, Symbian® OS and MeeGo®. Applications to be installed on these computing devices are typically operating system-specific. That is, an application specifically for the Android operating system can only be installed and executed on a computing device running the Android operating system. The Android® specific application will fail to install and execute on a computing device running a different operating system, for example, iOS®. Although various versions of an application may be available for different operating systems, this is not necessarily true for all applications. Furthermore, there may be times when a user is only able to access an application that is specific to an operating system that is different from the operating system running on the user's device.
The present invention addresses at least these limitations in the prior art.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed toward apparatuses, systems and methods of switching operating systems. The present invention includes a multi-OS runtime with virtualization technology, which allows applications developed for different operating systems to execute simultaneously, side-by-side, on the same computing device. The computing device typically includes a host operating system and at least one guest operating system. An application, which is disguised as a host operating system specific application on the host operating system, is configured to be installed and executed within the guest operating system. Host operating system based policies can be set for the application. The application can be launched from the host operating system, the guest operating system or both. The computing device allows for the ability to switch between different operating systems via a soft button, a hard button, or based on a configuration of the computing device, or a combination thereof.
In one aspect, a non-transitory computer-readable medium stores instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method. The method includes receiving a command to switch between at least two operating systems, and switching between any two operating systems based on the command. The at least two operating systems typically include a host operating system and a guest operating system. The host operating system can be the same as or different from the guest operating system.
In some embodiments, the command is provided via a soft key, a hard key or both. Alternatively or in addition to, the command is determined based on a configuration of the computing device.
The method also includes opening the guest operating system in an overlay. A guest operating system specific application is configured to be launched in the overlay. In some embodiments, the guest operating system specific application is activated from the guest operating system. Alternatively or in addition to, the guest operating system specific application is activated from the host operating system; the guest operating system specific application is disguised as a host operating system specific application in the host operating system. The guest operating system specific application can be activated from a folder within the host operating system, from a desktop area of the host operating system, or both.
In some embodiments, the method also includes launching the guest operating system specific application in the overlay. In some embodiments, the method also includes displaying a listing of any guest operating system specific applications in the overlay. Access restrictions using host operating system mechanisms can be applied on any guest operating system specific application.
In some embodiments, the method also includes assigning the host operating system to a processor and the guest operating system to another processor.
In another aspect, a non-transitory computer-readable medium stores instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method. The method includes receiving a command to execute a program from a first operating system, and executing the program in a second operating system. The computing system supports the second operating system and the first operating system.
In some embodiments, the program is disguised as a first operating system specific application in the first operating system. First operating system based policies can be set on the program. First operating system based policies are enforced on the program when the program is executing in the second operating system.
The program is removable from the first operating system. In some embodiments, removing the program in the first operating system thereby removes the program in the second operating system.
In some embodiments, the method also includes downloading and installing an application player associated with the second operating system on the computing device.
In some embodiments, the method also includes assigning a processor to the first operating system and another processor to the second operating system.
In yet another aspect, a computing device includes at least two operating systems and a switching mechanism configured to switch between any of the at least two operating systems. The at least two operating system typically includes a first operating system and a second operating system. In some embodiments, the first operating system is a host operating system of the computing device, and the second operating system is a guest operating system.
The switching mechanism includes a hard key on the computing device. Alternatively or in addition to, the switching mechanism includes a soft key. Alternatively or in addition to, the switching mechanism is dependent on a plurality of configurations of the computing device. In some embodiments, the computing device in a first configuration is predisposed to the first operating system, and the computing device in a second configuration is predisposed to the second operating system. For example, the first configuration is when the computing device is docked to a docking station, and the second configuration is when the computing device is undocked from the docking station. For another example, the first configuration is when the computing device is rotated to a laptop form, and the second configuration is when the computing device is rotated to a tablet form. For yet another example, the first configuration is when a screen does not obscure a keyboard, and the second configuration is when the screen obscures the keyboard.
In yet another aspect, a system includes a docking station, a computing device configured to couple with the docking station, and a display communicatively coupled with the docking station. The computing device includes at least two operating systems, including a first operating system and a second operating system. The computing device also includes a screen. The screen is configured to show content associated with one of the at least two operating systems when the computing device is docked to the docking station. The display is configured to show content associated with another of the at least two operating systems when the computing device is docked to the docking station.
In some embodiments, the computing device further includes a switching mechanism configured to switch between any of the at least two operating systems. In some embodiments, the computing device further includes an application. The application is disguised as a first operating system specific application on the first operating system and configured to be installed in the second operating system. In some embodiments, the first operating system is running on one processor, while the second operating system is running on another processor.
In yet another aspect, a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method. The method includes obtaining a guest operating system specific application, and wrapping the guest operating system specific application with a host operating system specific file, thereby creating a disguised file. In some embodiments, the disguised file appears as a native application to a host operating system. In some embodiments, the disguised file is activated from the host operating system to be executed within a guest operating system.
In yet another aspect, a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method. The method includes activating a disguised application from a host operating system, stripping a wrapping around the disguised application, thereby creating a stripped application, and installing the stripped application in a guest operating system. In some embodiments, the method further includes placing a proxy application on the host operating system. In some embodiments, the method further includes executing the stripped application in the guest operating system. In some embodiments, the disguised file appears as a native application to the host operating system.
Reference will now be made in detail to implementations of the present invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The same reference indicators will be used throughout the drawings and the following detailed description to refer to the same or like parts.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth for purposes of explanation. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the invention may be practiced without the use of these specific details. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed toward apparatuses, systems and methods of switching operating systems. The present invention includes a multi-OS runtime with virtualization technology, which allows applications developed for different operating systems to execute simultaneously, side-by-side, on the same computing device. The computing device typically includes a host operating system and at least one guest operating system. An application, which is disguised as a host operating system specific application on the host operating system, is configured to be installed and executed within the guest operating system. Host operating system based policies can be set for the application. The application can be launched from the host operating system, the guest operating system or both. The computing device allows for the ability to switch between different operating systems via a soft button, a hard button, or based on a configuration of the computing device, or a combination thereof.
In general, a hardware structure suitable for implementing the computing device 100 includes a network interface 102, a memory 104, processor(s) 106, I/O device(s) 108, a bus 110 and a storage device 112. The choice of processor is not critical as long as a suitable processor with sufficient speed is chosen. In some embodiments, the computing device 100 includes a plurality of processors 106. The memory 104 is able to be any conventional computer memory known in the art. The storage device 112 is able to include a hard drive, CDROM, CDRW, DVD, DVDRW, flash memory card, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM or any other storage device. The computing device 100 is able to include one or more network interfaces 102. An example of a network interface includes a network card connected to an Ethernet or other type of LAN. The I/O device(s) 108 are able to include one or more of the following: keyboard, mouse, monitor, display, printer, modem, touchscreen, button interface and other devices. Application(s) 116, including an application player and guest operating system specific applications, are likely to be stored in the storage device 112 and memory 104 and are processed by the processor 106. More or less components shown in
Switching Operating Systems
A computing device, such as the one illustrated in
While
For example, as illustrated in
For another example, as illustrated in
For yet another example, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, switching between operating systems can be based on a specific gesture. For example, the user can draw an “A” for Android® or a “W” for Windows 7® on a touch screen or a mouse/track pad of the computing device. For another example, the user can draw an “A” or a “W” in space that is captured by a camera coupled to the computing device. Other gestures, such as a flick or a swipe, with single or multi-touch variants, are also contemplated.
Although toggling between the host Windows 7® operating system and the guest Android® operating system has been described, toggling between the host Windows 7® operating system and a guest Android® operating system specific application is contemplated and similarly configured. Furthermore, toggling between an xth guest operating system and a yth guest operating system or a yth guest operating system specific application is also contemplated and similarly configured. In addition, although
The computing device 305 is similarly configured as the computing device 100, and includes a plurality of operating systems and at least one switching mechanism configured to switch between any of the plurality of operating systems. The operating systems typically includes a host operating system and a guest operating system. The computing device 305 is configured to communicatively couple with the docking station 310. When the computing device 305 is communicatively coupled with the docking station 310, then the screen of the computing device 305 shows content associated with one of the plurality of operating systems, while the display 315 shows content associated with another of the plurality of operating systems. In
The display 315 can be either physically or wirelessly coupled with the computing device 305, the docking station 310 or both. The display 315 can be a television, a display panel, or any suitable viewing device.
In some embodiments, the user is able to select which operating system is to be displayed on the computing device 305, on the display 315, or both. Alternatively or in addition to, such selection is automatically determined and performed upon communicatively coupling the computing device 305 to the docking station 310.
Typically, the user is able to switch between operating systems any number of times during use of the computing device either by changing physical configuration of the computing device, or by activating a soft key or a hard key.
When a virtual machine is closed or suspended, the state of the guest operating system in the virtual environment is typically saved. In some embodiments, the guest operating system flushes all its buffers and unused memory. The guest operating system also kills any user processes. The guest operating system then saves the state. These steps performed by the guest operating system advantageously reduce time to save and restore the state.
Pinning
In some embodiments, if a computing device includes multiple processors or cores, each operating system is pinned to one of the processors or cores, as illustrated in
Pinning can be arbitrary or calculated based on, for example, characteristics of the processors or cores. Pinning is used with a Type 1 hypervisor, a Type 2 hypervisor or with a hypervisor but with the help of other operating systems. In some embodiments, the pinning or assignment is done when a guest operating system is invoked. In some embodiments, the operating systems can be reassigned to different processors or cores after the initial pinning.
Operating System Specific Applications
Icons for applications, folders and files (collectively referred to as applications) specific to one operating system, e.g., a host operating system, can be displayed along with icons for applications specific to other operating system(s), e.g., guest operating system(s). Typically, for each guest operating system specific application, there is a corresponding proxy application in the host operating system.
The phrase “proxy application” can refer to a disguised application or a shortcut or other means to execute an installed guest operating specific application from the host operating system. It should be clear from the context which of the two uses “proxy application” is referring to.
For example,
For another example,
Each icon 605a, 605b is able to link to one or more proxy applications. When an icon 605a, 605b is activated, one or more corresponding applications are launched in the guest environment. A proxy application typically looks and appears to the host operating system just like a native application (e.g., a host operating system application). For example, referring back to
Although a proxy application is typically packaged in such a way that it appears as a native application to the host operating system, it is installed and executed in the guest operating system. Continuing with the example, the proxy Angry Birds® application is installed via a MSI package or an EXE. In one embodiment, the proxy Angry Birds® application is an Android® application package (APK) file wrapped with an EXE file. The proxy Angry Birds® application is thus disguised as a Windows 7® application in the host Windows® operating system. During installation of Angry Birds®, the proxy Angry Birds® is stripped of the EXE wrapping and is installed in the guest Android® operating system. After installation, Angry Birds® shows up in the installed programs list of the host Windows 7® operating system. When Angry Birds® is activated from the host Windows 7® operating system, it is executed in the guest Android® operating system. This installation process allows guest operating system specific applications to be distributed and managed using software currently used for managing and distributing Windows® applications, such as system center, HP Radia®, and Citrix® Receiver.
Assuming that the disguised file is on the user device,
In some embodiments, at least one proxy application, such as a shortcut or any means to start Angry Birds®, is placed on the host Windows® operating system after installation. A proxy application allows Angry Birds® to be started within the guest Android® operating system at any time after the installation.
In some embodiments, when Angry Birds® is removed, for example via the Add/Remove Programs feature from the host Windows 7® operating system, both the proxy application from the host operating system and the application from the guest operating system are removed. Alternatively, only the proxy application from the host operating system is removed without affecting the installation of the application in the guest operating system.
Host operating system policies or rules can be applied to any proxy application. Continuing with the example, Window 7 based policies or rules can be set for Angry Birds®. Exemplary policies or rules are one set in Active Directory, group policies, security policies set by A/V programs or firewall rules. These policies or rules can be local or administered via a remote management console or machine. Typically, these policies or rules are enforced when an application corresponding to the proxy is launched in its respective guest environment (e.g., guest Android® operating system).
Guest operating system specific applications can be stored in one or more different directories in the host operating system. Furthermore, different permissions and access rules can be applied to the guest operating system specific applications. In some embodiments, data shared between the host operating system and the guest operating system can be configured on an application by application basis. In some embodiments, data that is completely within the guest operating system can also be configured on an application by application basis. For example, trusted applications can access to c:\user\bstks\Desktop or Documents, etc., while non-trusted application can access only their folders.
Now assume the user has already downloaded or otherwise received a guest operating system specific program on a computing device, and the computing device only thus far supports a host operating system. The guest operating system specific program can be a game, a kids application, a photo application, a social application, a music application, a news application, a messaging application or any other application.
In some embodiments, the application player is also configured as an application broker, which interfaces with one or more application stores to download applications therefrom. An exemplary application broker is further disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 13/479,056, entitled “Application Broker,” which is hereby incorporated by reference.
At a step 710, a command is received to execute the program that is specific to the guest operating system, from the host environment. In some embodiments, an icon associated with the guest operating system specific program is located on the desktop of the host operating system, as illustrated in
As discussed elsewhere, the guest operating system specific program in the host operating system is a proxy program. Put differently, the guest operating system specific program, although only executable in the guest operating system, is post-processed to be appear just like a host operating system application.
At a step 715, the program is installed in the guest operating system. At a step 720, the program is executed within the guest operating system. After the step 720, the method 700 ends.
In some embodiments, the guest operating system specific application is launched in an overlay in the host environment. For example, referring back to
The present invention allows end consumers to enjoy a full guest environment or just download a guest operating system specific application directly on a host environment to run in a guest environment. In both cases, the complexity is advantageously and completely masked from the end consumer. The switch between operating systems is transparent to the end user.
While the invention has been described with reference to numerous specific details, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the invention. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the invention is not to be limited by the foregoing illustrative details, but rather is to be defined by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/479,056, filed May 23, 2012, entitled “APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF SWITCHING OPERATING SYSTEMS,” which claims benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. section 119(e) of the U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/489,611 filed May 24, 2011, entitled “Switch Operating Systems,” both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7210121 | Xia | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7328333 | Kawano et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7647491 | Kawano et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7987432 | Grechishkin et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7987459 | Chow et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8117554 | Grechishkin et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8140734 | Lou | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8161275 | Woodward | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8196120 | Irving | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8239667 | Durham | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255201 | Wang | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8301864 | Wang | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8332936 | Hackborn et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8438375 | Woodward | May 2013 | B1 |
8448160 | Vincent et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8453149 | Ben Yehuda | May 2013 | B2 |
8594649 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8661435 | Schroth | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8726263 | Rangarajan et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732697 | Jonnala et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8763115 | Budko | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8782258 | Brittain et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8819202 | Carolan et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8868899 | Galicia | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8924958 | Bangur et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9081601 | Tang | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9122547 | Samuel | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9176721 | Mann | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9348633 | Galicia | May 2016 | B2 |
9461996 | Hayton | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9618216 | Kashihara et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9858062 | Mann | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20040019601 | Gates | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040088405 | Aggarwal | May 2004 | A1 |
20040158813 | Xia | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050004992 | Horstrnann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050114870 | Song et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050198348 | Yeates | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060010314 | Xu | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010433 | Neil | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060212865 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080028400 | Taillefer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080052776 | Prabhat et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082815 | Kawano et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083036 | Ozzie et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080133903 | Sun et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141244 | Kelley | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080216071 | Gidalov | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090210702 | Welingkar et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090241104 | Amiga et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100010887 | Karlin | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063892 | Keronen | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100146504 | Tang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162233 | Ku et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180273 | Harris | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199037 | Umbehocker et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218184 | Minematsu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110016299 | Galicia et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035355 | Sagar et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110082900 | Nagpal et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106880 | Strong et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110110315 | Chen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125593 | Wright | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126216 | Galicia et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110173602 | Togami et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179253 | Yehuda | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185292 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185334 | Iyer et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110271088 | Princen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276621 | Edery et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277027 | Hayton | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302630 | Nair et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307354 | Erman | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314446 | Esbensen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314467 | Pearson | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005691 | Wong et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011513 | McConaughy et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011551 | Levy et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023507 | Travis | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030584 | Bian | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120042159 | Liu | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066675 | Shelansky et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079095 | Evans et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086716 | Reeves et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089906 | Reeves et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089992 | Reeves et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110315 | Lee | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110496 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116905 | Futty et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143900 | Ainslie et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159144 | Sengupta et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176746 | Chen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191961 | Wu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197968 | Korovin et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120206372 | Mundt et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216181 | Arcese et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120272233 | Lee | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120303476 | Krzyzanowski et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120324434 | Tewari et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130024778 | Reeves et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130047150 | Malasky et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054952 | Shen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130074069 | Li | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130081008 | Rangarajan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130095785 | Sadana et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130139182 | Sethuraman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130205294 | Mittal et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130268397 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140007084 | Ding | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140007222 | Qureshi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040878 | Mann | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059536 | Hiratsuka et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140109072 | Lang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150248281 | Zamir | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150248282 | Zamir | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150309811 | Wisgo | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150326562 | Belote et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160378451 | Walker | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160378878 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170039130 | Nandakumar et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170102976 | Nandakumar et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Eiraku et al., Fast networking with socket-outsourcing in hosted virtual machine environments, 8 pages (Year: 2009). |
Forrest et al., Virtualization and its effect on operating system, 11 pages (Year: 2011). |
Mark Wilson, ‘Steam comes to Mac, Offers Cross-Platform Gaming Free of Charge’, Mar. 8, 2010. |
Ali et al., “Same App, Different App Stores: A Comparative Study”, ACM, 2017, pp. 79-90, https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3104099. |
CITRIX, “Wrapping iOS mobile apps”, Citrix Systems, 2018, pp. 1-13, https://docs/citrix.com/en-us/mdx-toolkit/1 0/xmob-mdx-kit-app-wrap-ios.html. |
Ki et al., “Poster: Retro: An Automated, Application, Layer Record and Replay for Android”, ACM, MobiSys'14, 2014, pp. 373, http://dl.acm.org/results.cfm?h=1&cfid=417717926&cftoken=68174932. |
Liu et al., “ReWAP: Reducing Redundant Transfers for Mobile Web Browsing via App-Specific Resource Packaging”, IEEE, 2017, pp. 2625-2638; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber= 7762888. |
Perez, “How to Get Android Notifications on Your Computer Desktop (Mac, Linux or Windows)”, 2010, www.readwrite.com, pp. 1-5. |
Rapidvalue, “How to Choose the Right Architecture for Your Mobile Application”, RapidValue Solutions, 2012, pp. 1-16, http://www.rapidvaluesolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/How-to-Choose-the-Right-Technology-Architecture-for-Your-Mobile-Application.pdf. |
Wu et al., “Scaling Social Media Applications Into Geo-Distributed Clouds”, IEEE, 2014, pp. 1-14, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6766261. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61489611 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13479086 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14638709 | US |