Apparent resistivity-depth section generating method for short-offset electromagnetic exploration

Abstract

The present disclosure provides an apparent resistivity-depth section generating method for short-offset electromagnetic exploration, including: determining, in field zones divided quantitatively based on the induction number, positions of a recording point for each of observation points and frequencies or a time window thereof, and taking determined positions of the recording point as the assignment point for the observation point and the frequencies or the time window thereof, where one survey line of an axial configuration generates one apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line; and one survey line of an equatorial configuration typically generates one apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line, and apparent resistivity-depth sections along connecting lines from the observation points to the source which are the same as observation points in the number.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a 371 of international application of PCT application serial no. PCT/CN2021/125128, filed on Oct. 21, 2021, which claims the priority benefits of China application no. 202111147897.7, filed on Sep. 29, 2021. The entirety of each of the above mentioned patent applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this specification.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure belongs to the field of electromagnetic exploration, and in particular relates to a data interpretation method for short-offset electromagnetic exploration.

BACKGROUND

In active-source electromagnetic exploration, because of the limitation of transmitter power the field zone of CSAMT (controlled source audio-frequency magneto-telluric) will inevitably enter from the far-field zone to the intermediate-field zone or even the near-field zone as the frequency decreases. The original long-offset exploration is converted into to short-offset exploration with the decrease of the induction number (Kaufman A A, Keller G V. Frequency and Transient Soundings. Elsevier—Amsterdam—Oxford—New York 1983: p 93-94.). Correspondingly, the recording point will move towards the source under the action of the nonplanarwave effects with the increase of nonplanarwave-to-planarwave ratio, and the shadow effect will occur typically in case of complex geoelectric structure in the survey area (Boschetto N B, Hohmann G W. Controlled-source Audiofrequency Magnetotelluric Responses of Three-dimensional Bodies. Geophysics, 1991, 56(2): 255-264.). Due to the existence of short-offset exploration, a new apparent resistivity-depth section generating method is required to adapt to the movement of the recording point.

SUMMARY

In view of shortages in the prior art, the present disclosure provides a method of generating apparent resistivity-depth section with observed data for short-offset electromagnetic exploration, with the aim of conveniently solving a shadow effect caused by nonplanarwaves in short-offset exploration.

The present disclosure adopts the following technical solutions.

A method of generating apparent resistivity-depth section with observation data for short-offset electromagnetic exploration includes:

• • dividing a field zone according to an induction number (a ratio of an offset to a detection depth), and determining positions of a recording point for each of observation points in a near-field zone, an intermediate-field zone and a far-field zone, specifically:
  • dividing the field zone according to the ratio of the offset R_i to the detection depth H_i,j
  • determining the field zone
  • as the near-field zone if

$\begin{array}{cc}0\le \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\le 1& \left(1a\right)\end{array}$

• • as the intermediate-field zone if

$\begin{array}{cc}1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10& \left(1b\right)\end{array}$

• • as the far-field zone if

$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10& \left(1c\right)\end{array}$

• • where, i=1, 2, . . . , m is a serial number of the observation point, and j=1,2, . . . , n is a serial number of frequencies; and
  • determining the positions of the recording point for each of the observation points according to the divided zones above: a horizontal position of the recording point: the horizontal position of the recording point in the near-field zone is a midpoint of the offset, that in the far-field zone is a position where the observation point is located, and that in the intermediate-field zone moves linearly from the midpoint of the offset to the position where the observation point is located, as the induction number increases; and a vertical position of the recording point: the vertical position of the recording point in the near-field zone and the intermediate-field zone is located at the intersection of a line from the detection depth to a source and a perpendicular line passing through the horizontal position of the recording point, and that in the far-field zone is equal to the detection depth; and
  • taking the positions of the recording point as an assignment point for an apparent resistivity corresponding to each observation point and the frequencies thereof, where
  • (1) for an axial configuration, assuming that the source coincides with an origin O of a rectangular coordinate system, and a survey line is arranged along an x-axis, then on the xOz plane the horizontal position P_i,j^x of the recording point for each observation point in the near-field zone is

$P_{i,j}^x=\frac{R_i}{2},$ that in the far-field zone is P_i,j^x=R_i; and that in the intermediate-field zone moves linearly from

$P_{i,j}^x=\frac{R_i}{2}$ to observation point, specifically:

$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^x=\{\begin{array}{cc}\frac{R_i}{2},& 0\le \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\le 1\\ \frac{R_i}{18}\left(\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}-1\right)+\frac{R_i}{2},& 1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10\\ R_i,& \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10\end{array}& \left(2a\right)\end{array}$

• • the vertical position P_i,j^z of the recording point for each observation point in the near-field zone and the intermediate-field zone is at the intersection of the line from the H_i,j to the source and the perpendicular line passing through the P_i,j^x and that in the far-field zone is −H_i,j, specifically:

$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^z=\{\begin{array}{cc}-\frac{H_{i,j}}{R_i}{P}_{i,j}^x=-\frac{H_{i,j}}{2},& 0\le \frac{R_i}{H_j}\le 1\\ -\frac{H_{i,j}}{R_i}{P}_{i,j}^x=-\frac{R_i+8H_{i,j}}{18},& 1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10\\ -H_{i,j},& \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10\end{array}& \left(2b\right)\end{array}$

• • the above positions of the recording point are an assignment point for an apparent resistivity ρ_i,j^a of each observation point of the axial configuration on the xOz plane; and one survey line of the axial configuration generates one apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line; and
  • (2) for an equatorial configuration, assuming that the survey line is arranged along an x′-axis of a rectangular coordinate system, a midpoint of the survey line is taken as an origin O′, the source coincides with an origin O of a cylindrical-coordinate system, the line from the source to the observation point is along an r-axis, a part

$\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10$ in Equation (2) for the recording point of the axial configuration is taken, and the offset R is replaced with a position x_i′ of the observation point on the x′-axis, then on the x′O′z plane the horizontal position and the vertical position P of the recording point for each observation point are:

$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^{x^{\prime }}=x_i^{\prime },\mathrm{if}\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10& \left(3a\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^z=-H_{i,j},\mathrm{if}\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10& \left(3b\right)\end{array}$

• • a relationship between the offset R_i and the position x_i′ of the observation point is expressed as:R_i=√{square root over (OO′²+x_i′²)}  (4)
  • the above positions of the recording point are the assignment point for the apparent resistivity ρ_i,j^a of each observation point of the equatorial configuration on the x′O′z plane;
  • if a superscript x in Equation (2) for the recording point of the axial configuration is replaced as r, then on the rOz plane the horizontal position ρ_i,j^r and the vertical position P_i,j^z of the recording point for each observation point of the equatorial configuration are:

$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^r=\{\begin{array}{cc}\frac{R_i}{2},& 0\le \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\le 1\\ \frac{R_i}{18}\left(\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}-1\right)+\frac{R_i}{2},& 1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10\\ R_i,& \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10\end{array}& \left(5a\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^z=\{\begin{array}{cc}-\frac{H_{i,j}}{R_i}{P}_{i,j}^r=-\frac{H_{i,j}}{2},& 0\le \frac{R_i}{H_j}\le 1\\ -\frac{H_{i,j}}{R_i}{P}_{i,j}^r=-\frac{R_i+8H_{i,j}}{18},& 1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10\\ -H_{i,j},& \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10\end{array}& \left(5b\right)\end{array}$

• • the above positions of the recording point are the assignment point for the apparent resistivity ρ_i,j^a of each observation point of the equatorial configuration on the rOz plane; and
  • typically, one survey line of the equatorial configuration including m observation points generates one apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line and m apparent resistivity-depth sections along connecting lines from the observation points to the source.

The detection depth in the equations above may be calculated by the following general equations, or by other detection depth equations:

$\begin{array}{cc}{H}_{i,j}\approx 503\sqrt{\frac{{\rho }_{i,j}^a}{f_{i,j}}}m& \left(6\right)\end{array}$ (6)

• • where f_i,j is the jth frequency of the observation point i and ρ_i,j^α is the apparent resistivity.

Further, the above apparent resistivity ρ_i,j^a is obtained from any definition or algorithm, such as Cagniard apparent resistivity and a single-component apparent resistivity, or any future improved apparent resistivity definition and algorithm.

Further, the above method is applicable to any configuration with the offset, regardless of an electric source or a magnetic source.

Further, field observation records further include the position of the source besides the positions of the observation point, so as to determine the offset.

Further, the field zone division standard can be adjusted for any configuration, source and observation component.

1) The present disclosure provides a simple method of separating responses of planarwaves and nonplanarwaves for short-offset electromagnetic exploration, solving the shadow effect and expanding the application scope of the apparent resistivity-depth section interpretation method.

2) When the observation point cannot be arranged at a construction site limited by terrain, surface features and the like, the geoelectric responses below the original observation point can be observed at a different place by selecting appropriate offset or/and frequency, and thus the shadow effect is used.

3) Since the present disclosure can represent the geoelectric structure beyond that directly beneath the observation point, the equatorial configuration can be used to form a multiple apparent resistivity-depth sections to achieve quasi-three-dimensional (3D) exploration.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates the offset, detection depth and observation point.

FIG. 2A is the arranged plan of the axial configuration and apparent resistivity-depth section, and FIG. 2B is the apparent resistivity-depth section of the axial configuration and apparent resistivity-depth section on the xOz plane.

FIG. 3A is the arranged plan of the equatorial configuration and apparent resistivity-depth section, FIG. 3B is the apparent resistivity-depth section of the equatorial configuration and apparent resistivity-depth section on the x′O′z plane, and FIG. 3C is the apparent resistivity-depth section of the equatorial configuration and apparent resistivity-depth section on the rOz plane.

FIG. 4 is the arranged plan of the axial configuration in example 1.

FIG. 5 is the apparent resistivity-depth section of the axial configuration along the survey line in example 1.

FIG. 6 is the arranged plan of the equatorial configuration in example 2.

FIG. 7A is the apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line of an equatorial configuration in example, and FIGS. 7B, 7C, 7D, 7E and 7F are apparent resistivity-depth sections along connecting lines from observation points No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4 and No. 5 to the source, respectively.

In the figures: 1. source, 2. observation point, 3. offset, 4. detection depth H_i,j, 5. recording point (P_i,j^x, P_i,j^z), (P_i,j^x′, P_i,j^z) or (P_i,j^r, P_i,j^z), 6. distance, and 7. apparent resistivity contour curve.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

To clarify the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the present disclosure, the present disclosure is further described below in conjunction with the drawings and examples. It should be understood that the examples described herein are only used to explain the present disclosure, not to limit the present disclosure.

The present disclosure provides a method for generating apparent resistivity-depth section from observed data in short-offset electromagnetic exploration. A field zone is divided according to an induction number (a ratio of an offset to a detection depth), specifically:

The field zone is divided according to the ratio of the offset R to the detection depth H_i,j, and it is determined

• • as the near-field zone if

$\begin{array}{cc}0\le \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\le 1& \left(1a\right)\end{array}$

• • as the intermediate-field zone if

$\begin{array}{cc}1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10& \left(1b\right)\end{array}$

• • as the far-field zone if

$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10& \left(1c\right)\end{array}$

Positions of a recording point for each of observation points are determined from this. In the foregoing equations, 1, 2, . . . , m is a serial number of the observation point, and j=1, 2, . . . , n is a serial number of the frequencies.

According to the above divided field zones, the positions of the recording point for the observation point are determined in the near-field zone, the intermediate-field zone and the far-field zone, and the positions of the recording point are taken as the assignment point for the apparent resistivity corresponding to each observation point and the frequencies thereof.

As shown in FIG. 1, the horizontal position of the recording point in the near-field zone is the midpoint of the offset, that in the far-field zone is the position where the observation point is located, and that in the intermediate-field zone moves linearly from the midpoint of the offset to the position where the observation point is located. The vertical position of the recording point in the near-field zone and the intermediate-field zone is located at the point of intersection between the connecting line from the detection depth to the source and the perpendicular line passing through the horizontal position of the recording point, and that in the far-field zone is equal to the detection depth.

With an axial configuration and an equatorial configuration as examples, the apparent resistivity-depth section is specifically generated as follows:

• • (1) The axial configuration is as shown in FIG. 2A. Assuming that the source coincides with the origin O of a rectangular coordinate system, and the survey line is arranged along the x-axis, on the xOz plane the horizontal position P_i,j^x of the recording point for each observation point in the near-field zone is

$P_{i,j}^x=\frac{R_i}{2},$ and that in the far-field zone is P_i,j^x=R_i; and in the intermediate-field zone, the horizontal position of the recording point moves linearly from

$P_{i,j}^x=\frac{R_i}{2},$ to the observation point.

$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^x=\{\begin{array}{cc}\frac{R_i}{2},& 0\le \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\le 1\\ \frac{R_i}{18}\left(\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}-1\right)+\frac{R_i}{2},& 1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10\\ R_i,& \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10\end{array}& \left(2a\right)\end{array}$

The vertical position P_i,j^z of the recording point for each observation point in the near-field zone and the intermediate-field zone is located at the intersection of the line from H_i,j to the source and the perpendicular line passing through P J, and that in the far-field zone is −H_i,j

$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^z=\{\begin{array}{cc}-\frac{H_{i,j}}{R_i}{P}_{i,j}^x=-\frac{H_{i,j}}{2},& 0\le \frac{R_i}{H_j}\le 1\\ -\frac{H_{i,j}}{R_i}{P}_{i,j}^x=-\frac{R_i+8H_{i,j}}{18},& 1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10\\ -H_{i,j},& \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10\end{array}& \left(2b\right)\end{array}$

The positions of the recording point are the assignment point for the apparent resistivity ρ_i,j^a of each observation point of the axial configuration on the xOz plane. One survey line of the axial configuration generates one apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line (FIG. 2B).

(2) The equatorial configuration is as shown in FIG. 3A. Assuming that the survey line is arranged along the x′-axis of a rectangular coordinate system, the midpoint of the survey line is taken as the origin O′, the source coincides with the origin O of a cylindrical-coordinate system, the line from the source to the observation point is along the r-axis, the part

$\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10$ in Equation (2) for the recording point of the axial configuration is taken, and the offset R_i, is replaced with the position x_i′ of each observation point on the x′-axis, then on the x′O′z plane the horizontal position P_i,j^x′ and the vertical position P_i,j^z of the recording point for each observation point are:

$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^{x^{\prime }}=x_i^{\prime },\mathrm{if}\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10& \left(3a\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^z=-H_{i,j},\mathrm{if}\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10& \left(3b\right)\end{array}$

The relationship between the offset R_i and the position x_i′ of the observation point is expressed as:R_i=√{square root over (OO′²+x_i′²)}  (4)

The above positions of the recording point are the assignment point for the apparent resistivity ρ_i,j^a of the observation point of the equatorial configuration on the x′O′z plane.

If the superscript x in Equation (2) for the recording point of the axial configuration is replaced as r, then on the rOz plane the horizontal position ρ_i,j^r and the vertical position P_i,j^z of the recording point for each observation point of the equatorial configuration are:

$\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^r=\{\begin{array}{cc}\frac{R_i}{2},& 0\le \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\le 1\\ \frac{R_i}{18}\left(\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}-1\right)+\frac{R_i}{2},& 1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10\\ R_i,& \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10\end{array}& \left(5a\right)\end{array}$ $\begin{array}{cc}{P}_{i,j}^z=\{\begin{array}{cc}-\frac{H_{i,j}}{R_i}{P}_{i,j}^r=-\frac{H_{i,j}}{2},& 0\le \frac{R_i}{H_j}\le 1\\ -\frac{H_{i,j}}{R_i}{P}_{i,j}^r=-\frac{R_i+8H_{i,j}}{18},& 1<\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}<10\\ -H_{i,j},& \frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}\ge 10\end{array}& \left(5b\right)\end{array}$

The above positions of the recording point are the assignment point for the apparent resistivity ρ_i,j^a of each observation point of the equatorial configuration on the rOz plane.

Typically, one survey line of the equatorial configuration including m observation points generates one apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line (FIG. 3B) and m apparent resistivity-depth sections along connecting lines from the observation points to the source. (FIG. 3C illustrates an ith profile).

The present disclosure will be further described below in conjunction with two specific examples.

Example 1: Generation of the apparent resistivity-depth section of an axial configuration. FIG. 4 is the arranged plan of the configuration, with nine observation points in total. The right part of Table 1 gives the offsets of each observation point, and the left part gives the geoelectric models for calculating Cagniard apparent resistivities of each observation point:

${\rho }_{i,j}^a=\frac{1}{\mathrm{\mu \omega }}\frac{{❘E_x❘}^2}{{❘H_y❘}^2}$

The second column of Table 2 shows operating frequencies of each observation point, and the third column shows calculated results.

TABLE 1
Geoelectric models and offsets for observation points of the axial
configuration
	Obser-		Obser-
	vation		vation
Geoelectric model	point	Offset Ri	point	Offset Ri
ρ1 = 200 Ω · m h1 = 100 m	No. 1	R1 = 600 m	No. 6	R6 = 1600 m
ρ2 = 100 Ω · m h2 = 200 m	No. 2	R2 = 800 m	No. 7	R7 = 1800 m
ρ3 = 50 Ω · m	No. 3	R3 = 1000 m	No. 8	R8 = 2000 m
	No. 4	R4 = 1200 m	No. 9	R9 = 2200 m
Electric source arranged	No. 5	R5 = 1400 m	Observed Ex and Hy
along the x-axis			components

Substituting the Cagniard apparent resistivities ρ_i,j^a (third column in Table 2) into Equation (6) yields detection depths H_i,j, which are listed in the fourth column in Table 2. The fifth column shows induction numbers

$\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}.$

For the field zones divided according to Equation (1), substituting the offsets R_i and the detection depths H_i,j into Equation (2) yields the horizontal positions P_i,j^x and the vertical positions P_i,j^z of the recording points for each observation point, which are listed in the sixth and seventh columns of Table 2 respectively to serve as the assignment points for the apparent resistivities ρ_i,j^a in the third column. Then in the table, P_i,j^x as Column A, P_i,j^z as Column B, and ρ_i,j^a as Column C are listed in Table 3, thereby forming data of one apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line. Therefore, the apparent resistivity-depth section drawn with Surfer software is as shown in FIG. 5.

TABLE 2
Operating frequencies, apparent resistivities, detection depths, induction
numbers and recording points for each observation point of the axial configuration
Recording points of observation point No. 1 (R1 = 600 m) at each of frequencies
j	f1,j/Hz	ρa1,j/Ω · m	H1,j/m	R1/H1,j	Px1,j/m	Pz1,j/m
1	8192	209.9	80.53	7.45	515.0	−69.12
2	4096	207.3	113.1	5.30	443.3	−83.63
3	2048	180.3	149.2	4.01	400.6	−99.67
4	1024	138.3	184.8	3.24	374.8	−115.4
5	512	143.9	266.6	2.24	341.6	−151.8
6	256	254.1	501.1	1.19	306.5	−256.0
7	128	527.4	1021.	0.58	300.0	−510.5
8	64	1078.	2064.	0.29	300.0	−1032.
9	32	2143.	4117.	0.14	300.0	−2058.
10	16	4207.	8156.	0.07	300.0	−4078.
11	8	8249.	16152	0.03	300.0	−8076.
12	4	16241	32051	0.01	300.0	−16025
Recording points of observation point No. 2 (R2 = 800 m) at each of frequencies
j	f2,j/Hz	ρa2,j/Ω · m	H2,j/m	R2/H2,j	Px2,j/m	Pz2,j/m
1	8192	209.9	80.52	9.93	797.1	−80.23
2	4096	206.1	112.8	7.08	670.6	−94.59
3	2048	192.1	154.0	5.19	586.3	−112.9
4	1024	165.3	202.1	3.95	531.4	−134.2
5	512	129.3	252.7	3.16	496.2	−156.7
6	256	125.8	352.7	2.26	456.3	−201.2
7	128	196.8	623.7	1.28	412.5	−321.6
8	64	393.1	1246	0.64	400.0	−623.3
9	32	802.7	2519	0.31	400.0	−1259.
10	16	1602.	5033	0.15	400.0	−2516.
11	8	3155.	9989	0.08	400.0	−4994.
12	4	6200.	19804	0.04	400.0	−9902.
Recording points of observation point No. 3 (R3 = 1,000 m) at each of frequencies
j	f3,j/Hz	ρa3,j/Ω · m	H3,j/m	R3/H3,j	Px3,j/m	Pz3,j/m
1	8192	209.4	80.42	12.4	1000.	−80.42
2	4096	205.4	112.6	8.87	937.5	−105.6
3	2048	190.1	153.2	6.52	806.9	−123.6
4	1024	174.4	207.6	4.81	712.0	−147.8
5	512	148.5	270.9	3.69	649.4	−175.9
6	256	117.0	340.0	2.94	607.8	−206.7
7	128	112.6	471.8	2.11	562.1	−265.2
8	64	177.4	837.5	1.19	510.7	−427.8
9	32	360.5	1688	0.59	500.0	−844.1
10	16	741.6	3424	0.29	500.0	−1712.
11	8	1485.	6853	0.14	500.0	−3426.
12	4	2933.	13620	0.07	500.0	−6810.
Recording points of observation point No. 4 (R4 = 1,200 m) at each of frequencies
j	f4,j/Hz	ρa4,j/Ω · m	H4,j/m	R4/H4,j	Px4,j/m	Pz4,j/m
1	8192	209.3	80.40	14.9	1200.	−80.40
2	4096	206.8	113.0	10.6	1200.	−113.0
3	2048	189.3	152.9	7.84	1056.	−134.6
4	1024	173.5	207.0	5.79	919.6	−158.7
5	512	157.7	279.2	4.29	819.8	−190.7
6	256	129.0	357.1	3.35	757.3	−225.4
7	128	99.13	442.6	2.71	714.0	−263.4
8	64	104.5	643.0	1.86	657.7	−352.4
9	32	188.3	1220.	0.98	600.0	−610.1
10	16	396.8	2505.	0.47	600.0	−1252.
11	8	816.5	5081.	0.23	600.0	−2540.
12	4	1632.	10161	0.11	600.0	−5080.
Recording points at of observation point No. 5 (R5 = 1,400 m) at each of frequencies
j	f5,j/Hz	ρa5,j/Ω · m	H5,j/m	R5/H5,j	Px5,j/m	Pz5,j/m
1	8192	209.3	80.40	17.4	1400.	−80.40
2	4096	205.2	112.6	12.4	1400.	−112.6
3	2048	188.9	152.7	9.16	1334.	−145.6
4	1024	172.4	206.4	6.78	1149.	−169.5
5	512	158.8	280.1	4.99	1010.	−202.3
6	256	137.5	368.7	3.79	917.5	−241.6
7	128	104.9	455.3	3.07	861.3	−280.1
8	64	82.83	572.2	2.44	812.5	−332.1
9	32	114.3	950.7	1.47	736.7	−500.3
10	16	237.2	1937.	0.72	700.0	−968.5
11	8	503.5	3990.	0.35	700.0	−1995.
12	4	1025.	8052.	0.17	700.0	−4026.
Recording points at of observation point No. 6 (R6 = 1,600 m) at each of frequencies
j	f6,j/Hz	ρa6,j/Ω · m	H6,j/m	R6/H6,j	Px6,j/m	Pz6,j/m
1	8192	209.3	80.40	19.9	1600.	−80.40
2	4096	205.1	112.5	14.2	1600.	−112.5
3	2048	189.3	152.9	10.4	1600.	−152.9
4	1024	171.9	206.1	7.76	1401.	−180.5
5	512	157.9	279.3	5.72	1220.	−213.0
6	256	140.3	372.3	4.29	1093.	−254.3
7	128	112.7	472.0	3.38	1012.	−298.6
8	64	80.55	564.3	2.83	963.1	−339.6
9	32	81.52	802.8	1.99	888.2	−445.7
10	16	154.8	1564.	1.02	802.0	−784.2
11	8	336.9	3264.	0.49	800.0	−1632.
12	4	701.4	6661.	0.24	800.0	−3330.
Recording points of observation point No. 7 (R7 = 1,800 m) at each of frequencies
j	f7,j/Hz	ρa7,j/Ω · m	H7,j/m	R7/H7,j	Px7,j/m	Pz7,j/m
1	8192	209.2	80.39	22.3	1800.	−80.39
2	4096	205.0	112.5	15.9	1800.	−112.5
3	2048	188.8	152.7	11.7	1800.	−152.7
4	1024	171.7	205.9	8.73	1673.	−191.5
5	512	157.2	278.7	6.45	1445.	−223.8
6	256	140.1	372.1	4.83	1283.	−265.4
7	128	117.6	482.1	3.73	1173.	−314.3
8	64	85.09	580.0	3.10	1110.	−357.7
9	32	68.05	733.5	2.45	1045.	−426.0
10	16	108.8	1311.	1.37	937.1	−683.1
11	8	238.9	2749.	0.65	900.0	−1374.
12	4	509.6	5677.	0.31	900.0	−2838.
Recording points of observation point No. 8 (R8 = 2,000 m) at each of frequencies
j	f8,j/Hz	ρa8,j/Ω · m	H8,j/m	R8/H8,j	Px8,j/m	Pz8,j/m
1	8192	209.2	80.39	24.8	2000.	−80.39
2	4096	205.0	112.5	17.7	2000.	−112.5
3	2048	188.7	152.6	13.0	2000.	−152.6
4	1024	171.5	205.8	9.71	1968.	−202.6
5	512	156.8	278.4	7.18	1687.	−234.8
6	256	139.3	371.1	5.38	1487.	−276.0
7	128	119.4	485.9	4.11	1346.	−327.1
8	64	90.93	599.5	3.33	1259.	−377.5
9	32	64.32	713.1	2.80	1200.	−428.0
10	16	82.24	1140.	1.75	1083.	−617.9
11	8	176.8	2364.	0.84	1000.	−1182.
12	4	386.2	4942.	0.40	1000.	−2471.
Recording points of observation point No. 9 (R9 = 2,200 m) at each of frequencies
j	f9,j/Hz	ρa9,j/Ω · m	H9,j/m	R9/H9,j	Px9,j/m	Pz9,j/m
1	8192	209.2	80.39	27.3	2200.	−80.39
2	4096	204.9	112.5	19.5	2200.	−112.5
3	2048	188.5	152.6	14.4	2200.	−152.6
4	1024	171.7	205.9	10.6	2200.	−205.9
5	512	156.6	278.1	7.90	1944.	−245.8
6	256	138.7	370.2	5.94	1703.	−286.7
7	128	119.4	485.9	4.52	1531.	−338.2
8	64	95.73	615.1	3.57	1414.	−395.6
9	32	65.54	719.8	3.05	1351.	−442.1
10	16	66.87	1028.	2.13	1239.	−579.2
11	8	135.3	2068.	1.06	1107.	−1041.
12	4	301.6	4368.	0.50	1100.	−2184.

TABLE 3
Data for plotting the apparent resistivity-
depth section of the axial configuration
Column A corresponds to Pxij, Column B
corresponds to Pzij, and Column C corresponds to ρai,j.
A	B	C
515.0	−69.12	209.9
443.3	−83.63	207.3
400.6	−99.67	180.3
374.8	−115.4	138.3
341.6	−151.8	143.9
306.5	−256.0	254.1
300.0	−510.5	527.4
300.0	−1032.	1078.
300.0	−2058.	2143.
300.0	−4078.	4207.
300.0	−8076.	8249.
300.0	−16025	16241
797.1	−80.23	209.9
670.6	−94.59	206.1
586.3	−112.9	192.1
531.4	−134.2	165.3
496.2	−156.7	129.3
456.3	−201.2	125.8
412.5	−321.6	196.8
400.0	−623.3	393.1
400.0	−1259.	802.7
400.0	−2516.	1602.
400.0	−4994.	3155.
400.0	−9902.	6200.
1000.	−80.42	209.4
937.5	−105.6	205.4
806.9	−123.6	190.1
712.0	−147.8	174.4
649.4	−175.9	148.5
607.8	−206.7	117.0
562.1	−265.2	112.6
510.7	−427.8	177.4
500.0	−844.1	360.5
500.0	−1712.	741.6
500.0	−3426.	1485.
500.0	−6810.	2933.
1200.	−80.40	209.3
1200.	−113.0	206.8
1056.	−134.6	189.3
919.6	−158.7	173.5
819.8	−190.7	157.7
757.3	−225.4	129.0
714.0	−263.4	99.13
657.7	−352.4	104.5
600.0	−610.1	188.3
600.0	−1252.	396.8
600.0	−2540.	816.5
600.0	−5080.	1632.
1400.	−80.40	209.3
1400.	−112.6	205.2
1334.	−145.6	188.9
1149.	−169.5	172.4
1010.	−202.3	158.8
917.5	−241.6	137.5
861.3	−280.1	104.9
812.5	−332.1	82.83
736.7	−500.3	114.3
700.0	−968.5	237.2
700.0	−1995.	503.5
700.0	−4026.	1025.
1600.	−80.40	209.3
1600.	−112.5	205.1
1600.	−152.9	189.3
1401.	−180.5	171.9
1220.	−213.0	157.9
1093.	−254.3	140.3
1012.	−298.6	112.7
963.1	−339.6	80.55
888.2	−445.7	81.52
802.0	−784.2	154.8
800.0	−1632.	336.9
800.0	−3330.	701.4
1800.	−80.39	209.2
1800.	−112.5	205.0
1800.	−152.7	188.8
1673.	−191.5	171.7
1445.	−223.8	157.2
1283.	−265.4	140.1
1173.	−314.3	117.6
1110.	−357.7	85.09
1045.	−426.0	68.05
937.1	−683.1	108.8
900.0	−1374.	238.9
900.0	−2838.	509.6
2000.	−80.39	209.2
2000.	−112.5	205.0
2000.	−152.6	188.7
1968.	−202.6	171.5
1687.	−234.8	156.8
1487.	−276.0	139.3
1346.	−327.1	119.4
1259.	−377.5	90.93
1200.	−428.0	64.32
1083.	−617.9	82.24
1000.	−1182.	176.8
1000.	−2471.	386.2
2200.	−80.39	209.2
2200.	−112.5	204.9
2200.	−152.6	188.5
2200.	−205.9	171.7
1944.	−245.8	156.6
1703.	−286.7	138.7
1531.	−338.2	119.4
1414.	−395.6	95.73
1351.	−442.1	65.54
1239.	−579.2	66.87
1107.	−1041.	135.3
1100.	−2184.	301.6

Example 2: Generation of the apparent resistivity-depth section of an equatorial configuration. FIG. 6 is the arranged plan of the configuration. The distance between the survey line and the source is 2,000 m, with nine observation points in total. The right part of Table 4 gives the offsets of each observation point calculated from Equation (4), and the left part gives the geoelectric models for calculating Cagniard apparent resistivities of each observation point:

${\rho }_{i,j}^a=\frac{1}{\mathrm{\mu \omega }}\frac{{❘E_x❘}^2}{{❘H_y❘}^2}$

The second column of Table 5 shows the operating frequencies of each observation point, and the third column shows calculated results.

TABLE 4
Geoelectric models and offsets for observation points of the equatorial
configuration
	Obser-		Obser-
	vation		vation
Geoelectric model	point	Offset Ri	point	Offset Ri
ρ1 = 200 Ω · m h1 = 100 m	No. 1	R1 = 2154 m	No. 6	R6 = 2010 m
ρ2 = 100 Ω · m h2 = 200 m	No. 2	R2 = 2088 m	No. 7	R7 = 2040 m
ρ3 = 50 Ω · m	No. 3	R3 = 2040 m	No. 8	R8 = 2088 m
	No. 4	R4 = 2010 m	No. 9	R9 = 2154 m
Electric source arranged	No. 5	R5 = 2000 m	Observed Ex and Hy
along the x-axis			components

Substituting the Cagniard apparent resistivities ρ_i,j^a (third column in Table 5) into Equation (6) yields detection depths H_i,j, which are listed in the fourth column in Table 5. The fifth column shows induction numbers

$\frac{R_i}{H_{i,j}}.$

For the field zones divided according to Equation (1), substituting the offsets R_i and the detection depths H_i,j, into Equation (3) and Equation (5) yields the horizontal positions P_i,j^r and the vertical positions P_i,j^z of the recording points for each observation point, which are respectively listed in the sixth and seventh columns of Table 5 to serve as the assignment points for the apparent resistivities ρ_i,j^α in the third column. For each observation point selected from the table, x_i′, P_i,j^z and ρ_i,j^a corresponding to the recording point R_i=P_i,j^r in the far-field zone are respectively taken as Column A, Column B and Column C to list in No. 1-No. 9 in Table 6, thereby forming data of one apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line. Then, for each observation point, P_i,j^r as Column A, P_i,j^z as Column B, and ρ_i,j^a as Column C are listed in No. 1-S to No. 9-S in Table 6, thereby forming data of nine apparent resistivity-depth section along connecting lines from the observation points to the source. The apparent resistivity-depth sections drawn from these with the Surfer software are as shown by FIG. 7A-7F (only five sections are drawn due to the symmetry property).

TABLE 5
Operating frequencies, apparent resistivities, detection depths, induction
numbers and recording points for each observation point of the equatorial configuration
Recording points of observation point No.1 (R1 = 2,154 m, x′1 = −800 m) at each of frequencies
j	f1,j/Hz	ρa1,j/Ω · m	H1,j/m	R1/H1,j	Px1,j/m	Pz1,j/m
1	8192	209.1	80.36	26.8	2154.	−80.36
2	4096	205.6	112.7	19.1	2154.	−112.7
3	2048	190.1	153.2	14.0	2154.	−153.2
4	1024	170.5	205.2	10.4	2154.	−205.2
5	512	158.8	280.1	7.68	1877.	−244.1
6	256	141.6	374.2	5.75	1646.	−285.9
7	128	121.9	490.9	4.38	1482.	−337.8
8	64	106.3	648.5	3.32	1354.	−407.8
9	32	104.6	909.4	2.36	1240.	−523.8
0	16	114.1	1343.	1.60	1149.	−716.8
11	8	128.2	2013.	1.06	1085.	−1014.
12	4	145.7	3036.	0.70	1077.	−1518.
Recording points of observation point No.2 (R2 = 2,088 m, x′2 = −600 m) at each of frequencies
j	f2,j/Hz	ρa2,j/Ω · m	H2,j/m	R2/H2,j	Px2,j/m	Pz2,j/m
1	8192	209.1	80.36	25.9	2088.	−80.36
2	4096	205.6	112.7	18.5	2088.	−112.7
3	2048	190.1	153.2	13.6	2088.	−153.2
4	1024	171.8	206.0	10.1	2088.	−206.0
5	512	158.8	280.1	7.45	1792.	−240.5
6	256	141.8	374.3	5.57	1574.	−282.3
7	128	122.2	491.6	4.24	1420.	−334.5
8	64	107.1	650.9	3.20	1300.	−405.3
9	32	105.0	911.5	2.29	1193.	−521.1
10	16	113.7	1341.	1.55	1108.	−712.1
11	8	128.4	2015.	1.03	1048.	−1011.
12	4	151.2	3093.	0.67	1044.	−1546.
Recording points of observation point No. 3 (R3 = 2,040 m, x′3 = −400 m) at each of frequencies
j	f3,j/Hz	ρa3,j/Ω · m	H3,j/m	R3/H3,j	Px3,j/m	Pz3,j/m
1	8192	209.1	80.36	25.3	2040.	−80.36
2	4096	205.6	112.7	18.1	2040.	−112.7
3	2048	190.1	153.2	13.3	2040.	−153.2
4	1024	172.4	206.4	9.88	2026.	−205.0
5	512	158.8	280.2	7.28	1731.	−237.8
6	256	141.9	374.5	5.44	1523.	−279.7
7	128	122.5	492.2	4.14	1376.	−332.1
8	64	107.7	652.7	3.12	1260.	−403.4
9	32	105.4	913.1	2.23	1159.	−519.1
0	16	113.7	1341.	1.52	1079.	−709.4
11	8	129.4	2023.	1.00	1020.	−1012.
12	4	156.9	3150.	0.64	1020.	−1575.
Recording points of observation point No.4 (R4 = 2,010 m, x′4 = −200 m) at each of frequencies
j	f4,j/Hz	ρa4,j/Ω · m	H4,j/m	R4/H4,j	Px4,j/m	Pz4,j/m
1	8192	209.1	80.37	25.0	2010.	−80.37
2	4096	205.6	112.7	17.8	2010.	−112.7
3	2048	190.1	153.2	13.1	2010.	−153.2
4	1024	172.5	206.4	9.73	1980.	−203.4
5	512	158.9	280.2	7.17	1694.	−236.2
6	256	142.0	374.6	5.36	1492.	−278.1
7	128	122.7	492.6	4.08	1348.	−330.6
8	64	108.1	653.8	3.07	1236.	−402.2
9	32	105.7	914.2	2.19	1138.	−517.9
0	16	113.8	1341.	1.49	1060.	−708.0
11	8	130.3	2030.	0.99	1005.	−1015.
12	4	161.0	3191.	0.62	1005.	−1595.
Recording points of observation point No.5 (R5 = 2,000 m, x′5 = 0 m) at each of frequencies
j	f5,j/Hz	ρa5,j/Ω · m	H5,j/m	R5/H5,j	Px5,j/m	Pz5,j/m
1	8192	209.1	80.37	24.8	2000.	−80.37
2	4096	205.6	112.7	17.7	2000.	−112.7
3	2048	190.1	153.2	13.0	2000.	−153.2
4	1024	172.9	206.7	9.67	1963.	−202.9
5	512	158.9	280.2	7.13	1681.	−235.6
6	256	142.0	374.6	5.33	1481.	−277.6
7	128	122.8	492.7	4.05	1339.	−330.1
8	64	108.2	654.2	3.05	1228.	−401.8
9	32	105.7	914.5	2.18	1131.	−517.5
10	16	113.9	1342.	1.49	1054.	−707.6
11	8	130.6	2032.	0.98	1000.	−1016.
12	4	162.5	3206.	0.62	1000.	−1603.
Recording points of observation point No.6 (R6 = 2,010 m, x′6 = 200 m) at each of frequencies
j	f6,j/Hz	ρa6,j/Ω · m	H6,j/m	R6/H6,j	Px6,j/m	Pz6,j/m
1	8192	209.1	80.37	25.0	2010.	−80.37
2	4096	205.6	112.7	17.8	2010.	−112.7
3	2048	190.1	153.2	13.1	2010.	−153.2
4	1024	172.5	206.4	9.73	1980.	−203.4
5	512	158.9	280.2	7.17	1694.	−236.2
6	256	142.0	374.6	5.36	1492.	−278.1
7	128	122.7	492.6	4.08	1348.	−330.6
8	64	108.1	653.8	3.07	1236.	−402.2
9	32	105.7	914.2	2.19	1138.	−517.9
10	16	113.8	1341.	1.49	1060.	−708.0
11	8	130.3	2030.	0.99	1005.	−1015.
12	4	161.0	3191.	0.62	1005.	−1595.
Recording points of observation point No.7 (R7 = 2,040 m, x′7 = 400 m) at each of frequencies
j	f7,j/Hz	ρa7,j/Ω · m	H7,j/m	R7/H7,j	Px7,j/m	Pz7,j/m
1	8192	209.1	80.36	25.3	2040.	−80.36
2	4096	205.6	112.7	18.1	2040.	−112.7
3	2048	190.1	153.2	13.3	2040.	−153.2
4	1024	172.4	206.4	9.88	2026.	−205.0
5	512	158.8	280.2	7.28	1731.	−237.8
6	256	141.9	374.5	5.44	1523.	−279.7
7	128	122.5	492.2	4.14	1376.	−332.1
8	64	107.7	652.7	3.12	1260.	−403.4
9	32	105.4	913.1	2.23	1159.	−519.1
0	16	113.7	1341.	1.52	1079.	−709.4
11	8	129.4	2023.	1.00	1020.	−1012.
12	4	156.9	3150.	0.64	1020.	−1575.
Recording points of observation point No.8 (R8 = 2,088 m, x′8 = 600 m) at each of frequencies
j	f8,j/Hz	ρa8,j/Ω · m	H8,j/m	R8/H8,j	Px8,j/m	Pz8,j/m
1	8192	209.1	80.36	25.9	2088.	−80.36
2	4096	205.6	112.7	18.5	2088.	−112.7
3	2048	190.1	153.2	13.6	2088.	−153.2
4	1024	171.8	206.0	10.1	2088.	−206.0
5	512	158.8	280.1	7.45	1792.	−240.5
6	256	141.8	374.3	5.57	1574.	−282.3
7	128	122.2	491.6	4.24	1420.	−334.5
8	64	107.1	650.9	3.20	1300.	−405.3
9	32	105.0	911.5	2.29	1193.	−521.1
10	16	113.7	1341.	1.55	1108.	−712.1
11	8	128.4	2015.	1.03	1048.	−1011.
12	4	151.2	3093.	0.67	1044.	−1546.
Recording points of observation point No.9 (R9 = 2,154 m, x′9 = 800 m) at each of frequencies
j	f9,j/Hz	ρa9,j/Ω · m	H9,j/m	R9/H9,j	Px9,j/m	Pz9,j/m
1	8192	209.1	80.36	26.8	2154.	−80.36
2	4096	205.6	112.7	19.1	2154.	−112.7
3	2048	190.1	153.2	14.0	2154.	−153.2
4	1024	170.5	205.2	10.4	2154.	−205.2
5	512	158.8	280.1	7.68	1877.	−244.1
6	256	141.6	374.2	5.75	1646.	−285.9
7	128	121.9	490.9	4.38	1482.	−337.8
8	64	106.3	648.5	3.32	1354.	−407.8
9	32	104.6	909.4	2.36	1240.	−523.8
10	16	114.1	1343.	1.60	1149.	−716.8
11	8	128.2	2013.	1.06	1085.	−1014.
12	4	145.7	3036.	0.70	1077.	−1518.

TABLE 6
Data for plotting the apparent resistivity-depth
section of the equatorial configuration
Column A corresponds to x′1 or Prij, Column B
corresponds to Pzij, and Column C corresponds to ρai,j.
No.1-No.9
A	B	C
−800.0	−80.36	209.1
−800.0	−112.7	205.6
−800.0	−153.2	190.1
−800.0	−205.2	170.5
−600.0	−80.36	209.1
−600.0	−112.7	205.6
−600.0	−153.2	190.1
−600.0	−206.0	171.8
−400.0	−80.36	209.1
−400.0	−112.7	205.6
−400.0	−153.2	190.1
−200.0	−80.37	209.1
−200.0	−112.7	205.6
−200.0	−153.2	190.1
0.0	−80.37	209.1
0.0	−112.7	205.6
0.0	−153.2	190.1
200.0	−80.37	209.1
200.0	−112.7	205.6
200.0	−153.2	190.1
400.0	−80.36	209.1
400.0	−112.7	205.6
400.0	−153.2	190.1
600.0	−80.36	209.1
600.0	−112.7	205.6
600.0	−153.2	190.1
600.0	−206.0	171.8
800.0	−80.36	209.1
800.0	−112.7	205.6
800.0	−153.2	190.1
800.0	−205.2	170.5
No.1-Source
A	B	C
2154.	−80.36	209.1
2154.	−112.7	205.6
2154.	−153.2	190.1
2154.	−205.2	170.5
1877.	−244.1	158.8
1646.	−285.9	141.6
1482.	−337.8	121.9
1354.	−407.8	106.3
1240.	−523.8	104.6
1149.	−716.8	114.1
1085.	−1014.	128.2
1077.	−1518.	145.7
No.2-Source
A	B	C
2088.	−80.36	209.1
2088.	−112.7	205.6
2088.	−153.2	190.1
2088.	−206.0	171.8
1792.	−240.5	158.8
1574.	−282.3	141.8
1420.	−334.5	122.2
1300.	−405.3	107.1
1193.	−521.1	105.0
1108.	−712.1	113.7
1048.	−1011.	128.4
1044.	−1546.	151.2
No.3-Source
A	B	C
2040.	−80.36	209.1
2040.	−112.7	205.6
2040.	−153.2	190.1
2026.	−205.0	172.4
1731.	−237.8	158.8
1523.	−279.7	141.9
1376.	−332.1	122.5
1260.	−403.4	107.7
1159.	−519.1	105.4
1079.	−709.4	113.7
1020.	−1012.	129.4
1020.	−1575.	156.9
No.4-Source
A	B	C
2010.	−80.37	209.1
2010.	−112.7	205.6
2010.	−153.2	190.1
1980.	−203.4	172.5
1694.	−236.2	158.9
1492.	−278.1	142.0
1348.	−330.6	122.7
1236.	−402.2	108.1
1138.	−517.9	105.7
1060.	−708.0	113.8
1005.	−1015.	130.3
1005.	−1595.	161.0
No.5-Source
A	B	C
2000.	−80.37	209.1
2000.	−112.7	205.6
2000.	−153.2	190.1
1963.	−202.9	172.9
1681.	−235.6	158.9
1481.	−277.6	142.0
1339.	−330.1	122.8
1228.	−401.8	108.2
1131.	−517.5	105.7
1054.	−707.6	113.9
1000.	−1016.	130.6
1000.	−1603.	162.5
No.6-Source
A	B	C
2010.	−80.37	209.1
2010.	−112.7	205.6
2010.	−153.2	190.1
1980.	−203.4	172.5
1694.	−236.2	158.9
1492.	−278.1	142.0
1348.	−330.6	122.7
1236.	−402.2	108.1
1138.	−517.9	105.7
1060.	−708.0	113.8
1005.	−1015.	130.3
1005.	−1595.	161.0
No.7-Source
A	B	C
2040.	−80.36	209.1
2040.	−112.7	205.6
2040.	−153.2	190.1
2026.	−205.0	172.4
1731.	−237.8	158.8
1523.	−279.7	141.9
1376.	−332.1	122.5
1260.	−403.4	107.7
1159.	−519.1	105.4
1079.	−709.4	113.7
1020.	−1012.	129.4
1020.	−1575.	156.9
No.8-Source
A	B	C
2088.	−80.36	209.1
2088.	−112.7	205.6
2088.	−153.2	190.1
2088.	−206.0	171.8
1792.	−240.5	158.8
1574.	−282.3	141.8
1420.	−334.5	122.2
1300.	−405.3	107.1
1193.	−521.1	105.0
1108.	−712.1	113.7
1048.	−1011.	128.4
1044.	−1546.	151.2
No.9-Source
A	B	C
2154.	−80.36	209.1
2154.	−112.7	205.6
2154.	−153.2	190.1
2154.	−205.2	170.5
1877.	−244.1	158.8
1646.	−285.9	141.6
1482.	−337.8	121.9
1354.	−407.8	106.3
1240.	−523.8	104.6
1149.	−716.8	114.1
1085.	−1014.	128.2
2088.	−206.0	171.8
1000.	−1518.	145.7

In addition, according to the present application, the detection depth may be calculated by the following general equations, or other detection depth equations:

$\begin{array}{cc}{H}_{i,j}\approx 503\sqrt{\frac{{\rho }_{i,j}^a}{f_{i,j}}}m& \left(6\right)\end{array}$ (6)

• • where f_i,j is the jth frequency of the observation point i and ρ_i,j^α is the apparent resistivity.

The apparent resistivity ρ_i,j^a can further be obtained from any definition or algorithm, such as a single-component apparent resistivity, or any future improved apparent resistivity definition and algorithm.

The above method is applicable to any configuration with the offset, regardless of an electric source or a magnetic source.

Field observation records further include a position of the source besides the positions of the observation point, so as to determine the offset.

For field zone division in Equations (1), (2), (3), and (5), a value 10 is used as a field zone division standard. The field zone division standard can further be adjusted to other values. Such an adjustment can be made for any configuration, source and observation component.

In conclusion, the present disclosure determines, in field zones divided quantitatively based on an induction number, the positions of the recording point for each observation point and the frequency thereof. The horizontal position of the recording point in the near-field zone is a midpoint of the offset, that in the far-field zone is a position where the observation point is located, and that in the intermediate-field zone moves linearly from the midpoint of the offset to the position where the observation point is located, as the induction number increases. The vertical position of the recording point in the near-field zone and the intermediate-field zone is located at a point of intersection of the line from the detection depth to the source and the perpendicular line passing through the horizontal position of the recording point, and that in the far-field zone is equal to the detection depth. The positions of the recording point are the assignment point for the apparent resistivity corresponding to each observation point and the frequency thereof. One survey line of the axial configuration generates one apparent resistivity-depth section extending along the survey line. One survey line of the equatorial configuration typically generates one apparent resistivity-depth section along the survey line and apparent resistivity-depth sections along connecting lines from the observation points to the source which are the same as observation points in the number. The generated apparent resistivity-depth section provides a simple method to solve the shadow effect caused by nonplanarwaves in short-offset exploration, which widens the application scope of the original apparent resistivity-depth section (Phoenix Geophysics Limited and China University of Geosciences, 2010; Phoenix Geophysics Limited, 2010) interpretation method for representing the geoelectric response below the observation point.

The above examples are only used for illustrating the design ideas and characteristics of the present disclosure, and the purpose thereof is to enable the person skilled in the art to understand the contents of the present disclosure and make implementation; and the protection scope of the present disclosure is not limited to the above examples. Therefore, the equivalent changes or modifications made on the basis of principles and design idea disclosed in the present disclosure are within the protection scope of the present disclosure.

Claims

1. An apparent resistivity-depth section generating method for a short-offset electromagnetic exploration, comprising: dividing a field zone according to an induction number, namely a ratio of an offset to a detection depth, and determining positions of a recording point for each of observation points in a near-field zone, an intermediate-field zone and a far-field zone, specifically:dividing the field zone according to the ratio of the offset Ri to the detection depth Hi,j determining the field zone as the near-field zone if

2. The apparent resistivity-depth section generating method for the short-offset electromagnetic exploration according to claim 1, wherein the detection depth is calculated by the following general equations:

3. The apparent resistivity-depth section generating method for the short-offset electromagnetic exploration according to claim 2, wherein the apparent resistivity ρi,ja is calculated from a definition and an algorithm of a Cagniard apparent resistivity or a single-component apparent resistivity, or from any improved apparent resistivity definition and algorithm.

4. The apparent resistivity-depth section generating method for the short-offset electromagnetic exploration according to claim 1, wherein the apparent resistivity ρi,ja is calculated from a definition and an algorithm of a Cagniard apparent resistivity or a single-component apparent resistivity, or from any improved apparent resistivity definition and algorithm.

5. The apparent resistivity-depth section generating method for the short-offset electromagnetic exploration according to claim 1, wherein the method is applicable to any configuration with the offset, regardless of an electric source or a magnetic source.

6. The apparent resistivity-depth section generating method for the short-offset electromagnetic exploration according to claim 1, wherein field observation records further comprise the position of the source device besides the positions of the observation point, so as to determine the offset.

7. The apparent resistivity-depth section generating method for the short-offset electromagnetic exploration according to claim 1, wherein for frequency-domain or time-domain exploration, the field zone division standard is adjusted for any configuration, source device and observation component.