Dielectric heating is the process in which a high-frequency alternating electric field heats a dielectric material, such as water molecules. At higher frequencies, this heating is caused by molecular dipole rotation within the dielectric material, while at lower frequencies in conductive fluids, other mechanisms such as ion-drag are more important in generating thermal energy.
Microwave frequencies are typically applied for cooking food items and are considered undesirable for drying laundry articles because of the possible temporary runaway thermal effects random application of the waves in a traditional microwave. Radio frequencies and their corresponding controlled and contained e-field are typically used for drying of textiles.
When applying an RF electronic field (e-field) to a wet article, such as a clothing material, the e-field may cause the water molecules within the e-field to dielectrically heat, generating thermal energy that effects the rapid drying of the articles.
One aspect of the invention is directed to a radio frequency (RF) laundry dryer. The RF laundry dryer includes an RF generator, an RF applicator having a perforated body supporting anode and cathode elements, with both elements operably coupled to the RF generator to generate an e-field between the anode and cathode upon the energizing of the RF generator, a fan arranged relative to the perforated body to flow or draw air through the perforated body and an electromagnetic shield protecting the fan from the e-field.
In the drawings:
While this description may be primarily directed toward a laundry drying machine, the invention may be applicable in any environment using a radio frequency (RF) signal application to dehydrate any wet article.
As more clearly seen in
The cathode element 16 may further include at least one contact point 52, a first comb element 36 having a first base 38 from which extend a first plurality of digits 40 and a second comb element 42 having a second base 44 from which extend a second plurality of digits 46. The anode and cathode elements 14, 16 are fixedly mounted to the supporting perforated body 18 in such a way as to interdigitally arrange the first plurality of digits 32 of the tree element 28 of the anode 14 and the first plurality of digits 40 of the first comb element 36 of the cathode 16. Additionally, the anode and cathode elements 14, 16 are fixedly mounted to the supporting perforated body 18 in such a way as to interdigitally arrange the second plurality of digits 34 of the tree element 28 of the anode 14 and the second plurality of digits 46 of the second comb element 42 of the cathode 16.
All of the elements of the anode and cathode elements 14, 16 are preferably arranged in a coplanar configuration. The first base element 38 of the cathode element 16 and the second base element 44 of the cathode element 16 will be in physical connection by way of a third interconnecting base element 48 that effectively wraps the first and second comb elements 36, 42 of the cathode element 16 around the anode element 14 in a given plane to form a single point of access for external connection of the anode's base element 30 to a contact point 50. Other arrangements of the digits, base elements and contact points of the anode may be implemented. For example, the digits of either the first plurality or second plurality of digits 32, 34 may not be perpendicular to the base element 30. The digits of either the first plurality and the second plurality of digits 32, 34 may not intersect the base element 30 at the same angle or location. The digits may further include geometries more complicated than the simple linear structures shown in
The anode and cathode elements 14, 16 may be fixedly mounted to the supporting perforated body 18 by, for example, adhesion, fastener connections, or laminated layers. Alternative mounting techniques may be employed.
The RF applicator 12 may be configured to generate a field of electromagnetic radiation (e-field) within the radio frequency spectrum between the anode 14 and cathode 16 elements. The anode element 14 of the RF applicator 12 may be electrically coupled to an RF generator 20 by a contact point 50 on the anode element 14. The cathode element 16 of the RF applicator may be electrically coupled to the RF generator 20 by one or more additional contact points 52 of the cathode element 16. The cathode contact points 52 and their connection to the RF generator 20 are additionally connected to an electrical ground 54. In this way, the RF generator 20 may apply an RF signal of a desired power level and frequency to energize the RF applicator 12. One such example of an RF signal generated by the RF applicator 12 may be 13.56 MHz. The radio frequency 13.56 MHz is one frequency in the band of frequencies between 13.553 MHz and 13.567 MHz. The band of frequencies between 13.553 MHz and 13.567 MHz is known as the 13.56 MHz band and is one of several bands that make up the industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) radio bands. The generation of another RF signal, or varying RF signals, particularly in the ISM radio bands, is envisioned.
Microwave frequencies are typically applied for cooking food items. However, their high frequency and resulting greater dielectric heating effect make microwave frequencies undesirable for drying laundry articles. Radio frequencies and their corresponding lower dielectric heating effect are typically used for drying of laundry. In contrast with a conventional microwave heating appliance, where microwaves generated by a magnetron are directed into a resonant cavity by a waveguide, the RF applicator 12 induces a controlled electromagnetic field between the anode and cathode elements 14, 16. Stray-field or through-field electromagnetic heating; that is, dielectric heating by placing wet articles near or between energized applicator elements, provides a relatively deterministic application of power as opposed to conventional microwave heating technologies where the microwave energy is randomly distributed (by way of a stirrer and/or rotation of the load). Consequently, conventional microwave technologies may result in thermal runaway effects that are not easily mitigated when applied to certain loads (such as metal zippers etc.). It is understood that the differences between microwave ovens and RF dryers arise from the differences between the implementation structures of applicator vs. magnetron/waveguide, which renders much of the microwave solutions inapplicable for RF dryers. It may be instructive to consider how the application of electromagnetic energy in RF dryers differs than the application of electromagnetic energy in conventional microwave technology with an analogy. For example, if electromagnetic energy is analogous to water, then a conventional microwave acts as a sprinkler randomly radiating in an omni-directional fashion whereas the RF dryer is akin to a wave pool.
Each of the conductive anode and cathode elements 14, 16 remain at least partially spaced from each other by a separating gap, or by non-conductive segments. By fixedly mounting the anode and cathode elements 14, 16 to the supporting perforated body 18 as described above, the anode and cathode elements 14, 16 may remain appropriately spaced. Referring now to
The supporting perforated bodies 18, 56 may also provide a rigid structure for the RF laundry drying appliance 10 shown in
Returning to
The aforementioned structure of the RF laundry drying appliance 10 operates by creating a capacitive coupling between the pluralities of digits 32, 40 and 34, 46 of the anode element 14 and the cathode element 16, at least partially spaced from each other. During drying operations, wet textiles to be dried may be placed on the upper surface 60 of the bed. During, for instance, a predetermined cycle of operation, the RF applicator 12 may be continuously or intermittently energized to generate an e-field between the capacitive coupling which interacts with liquid in the textile. The liquid residing within the e-field will be dielectrically heated to effect a drying of the textile.
During the drying process, water in the wet clothing may become heated to the point of evaporation. As seen in
Alternatively, the RF dryer may be configured in a substantially vertical orientation. The relative configuration of the fans, the baffles and the perforated body may enable air flow to be directed along a vector substantially orthogonal to the drying surface and through the perforations of the perforated body 18. In this way, it is understood that the air flow can be directed in any particular direction be it up or down or left or right without loss of effectiveness as long as the air flow is uniformly directed through the perforated body.
The perforated body 18 and the anode, cathode and drying surface of the RF laundry drying appliance 10 may be placed between the one or more fans 22. To act as an electromagnetic shield 26, a perforated body may contain at least one layer of a conductive material to protect the one or more fans 22 from the e-field generated by the RF applicator 12. The dimensions of the perforations 64 provided in the perforated body 18 are selected to be of a size to maximize air flow and prevent textile material from drooping into the perforations.
The e-field across the anode and cathode elements 14, 16 may not pass through the perforated body of the electromagnetic shield 26 and electrically interfere with the operation of the fans 22. The dimensions of the perforations 65 may be selected according to one of many functions related to wavelength. For example, selecting the dimension of the perforations 65 to be approximately 1/20th or smaller of the wavelength of the e-field results in perforations smaller than 1.1 meters for an RF applicator operating at 13.6 MHz to provide an effective electromagnetic shield for the one or more fans 22. A second example arises when considering an RF applicator operating at a frequency in the 2.4 GHz ISM band. In this example, the largest dimension of the perforations may not exceed 0.63 cm to be approximately 1/20th the wavelength of the RF applicator. However, due to magnetics, near-field effects and harmonics, the dimensions of the perforations are much smaller and are generally selected to be as small as possible without limiting air flow. Other methods may be used and may primarily be driven by the standards required relating to the mitigation or prevention of electromagnetic leakage.
In this way, textiles may be dried in the RF laundry dryer by flowing air from at least one fan 22 through the perforations in the perforated body 18 onto textiles supported by the RF applicator 12 and electromagnetically shielding the at least one fan 22 during the flowing of the air from the bottom to the top or the top to the bottom of the RF applicator 12. The vertical flowing of the air through the RF applicator 12 via the perforations of the perforated body 18 is directed, in part, by the baffles 24 placed on top or underneath the RF applicator 12. By forming a composite of the perforated bodies 18, 56 and the anode and cathode elements 14, 16 in the RF applicator 12, the structure effectively increases drying efficiency by directing air flow 62 through the RF applicator 12 and provides electromagnetic shielding of electronic components such as fans 22.
Many other possible configurations in addition to that shown in the above figures are contemplated by the present embodiment. For example, one embodiment of the invention contemplates different geometric shapes for the laundry drying appliance 10, such as a substantially longer, rectangular appliance 10 where the anode and cathode elements 14, 16 are elongated along the length of the appliance 10, or the longer appliance 10 includes a plurality of anode and cathode element 14, 16 sets.
In such a configuration, the upper surface 60 of the bed may be smooth and slightly sloped to allow for the movement of wet laundry across the laundry drying appliance 10, wherein the one or more anode and cathode element 14, 16 sets may be energized individually or in combination by one or more RF applicators 12 to dry the laundry as it traverses the appliance 10.
The aspects disclosed herein provide a laundry treating appliance using RF applicator to dielectrically heat liquid in wet articles to effect a drying of the articles. One advantage that may be realized in the above aspects may be that the above described aspects are able to dry articles of clothing during rotational or stationary activity, allowing the most efficient e-field to be applied to the clothing for particular cycles or clothing characteristics. A further advantage of the above aspects may be that the above aspects allow for selective energizing of the RF applicator according to such additional design considerations as efficiency or power consumption during operation.
Additionally, the design of the anode and cathode may be controlled to allow for individual energizing of particular RF applicators in a single or multi-applicator embodiment. The effect of individual energization of particular RF applicators results in avoiding anode/cathode pairs that would result in no additional material drying (if energized), reducing the unwanted impedance of additional anode/cathode pairs and electromagnetic fields, and an overall reduction to energy costs of a drying cycle of operation due to increased efficiencies.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
This application claims priority to and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/966,577, filed Aug. 14, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1503224 | Blaine | Jul 1924 | A |
1871269 | Hobrock | Aug 1932 | A |
2112418 | Hart, Jr. et al. | Mar 1938 | A |
2212522 | Hart, Jr. et al. | Aug 1940 | A |
2228136 | Hart, Jr. | Jan 1941 | A |
2231457 | Stephen | Feb 1941 | A |
2276996 | Milinowski | Mar 1942 | A |
2449317 | Pitman | Sep 1948 | A |
2511839 | Frye | Jun 1950 | A |
2542589 | Stanton et al. | Feb 1951 | A |
2582806 | Nes et al. | Jan 1952 | A |
2642000 | Wieking | Jun 1953 | A |
2656839 | Howard | Oct 1953 | A |
2740756 | Thomas | Apr 1956 | A |
2773162 | Christensen | Dec 1956 | A |
3161480 | Birch-Iensen et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3184637 | Skinner | May 1965 | A |
3316380 | Pansing | Apr 1967 | A |
3355812 | Bennett | Dec 1967 | A |
3364294 | Garibian et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3426439 | Ryman et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3439431 | Heidtmann | Apr 1969 | A |
3537185 | Ingram | Nov 1970 | A |
3543408 | Candor et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3601571 | Curcio | Aug 1971 | A |
3652816 | Preston | Mar 1972 | A |
3701875 | Witsey et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3754336 | Feild | Aug 1973 | A |
3878619 | Hodgett | Apr 1975 | A |
3969225 | Horowitz | Jul 1976 | A |
4014732 | Beckert et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4028518 | Bourdouris et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4119826 | Chambley et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4197851 | Fellus | Apr 1980 | A |
4296298 | MacMaster et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4296299 | Stottmann et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4365622 | Harrison | Dec 1982 | A |
4409541 | Richards | Oct 1983 | A |
4523387 | Mahan | Jun 1985 | A |
4529855 | Fleck | Jul 1985 | A |
4638571 | Cook | Jan 1987 | A |
5152075 | Bonar | Oct 1992 | A |
5495250 | Ghaem et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5838111 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5983520 | Kim et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6124584 | Blaker et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6189231 | Lancer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6531880 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6812445 | Gorbold | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7526879 | Bae et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7619403 | Kashida | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7676953 | Magill | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7883609 | Petrenko et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8499472 | Bari et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8826561 | Wisherd et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8839527 | Ben-Shmuel et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8943705 | Wisherd et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9127400 | Herman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9173253 | Wohl et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9194625 | Herman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9200402 | Wisherd et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9410282 | Herman et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9447537 | Wisherd et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9540759 | Herman et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9605899 | Herman | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9784499 | Herman | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20020047009 | Flugstad et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030199251 | Gorbold | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040149734 | Petrenko et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050120715 | Labrador | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050286914 | Nagahama | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060097726 | Frederick et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060289526 | Takizaki et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070045307 | Tsui et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080134792 | Lee et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090172965 | Campagnolo | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195255 | Kalokitis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100115785 | Ben-Shmuel et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110245900 | Turner et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110308101 | Wisherd et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120164022 | Muginstein et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120247800 | Shah et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120291304 | Wisherd et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130119055 | Wohl et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130201068 | Alexopoulos et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207674 | Hahl et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130271811 | Lam et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130316051 | Van Der Voort et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140325865 | Wisherd et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150020403 | Herman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150089829 | Herman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150101207 | Herman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150102801 | Herman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150159949 | Herman et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150187971 | Sweeney et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20180266041 | Herman et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190128605 | Herman et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0269358 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0269358 | Aug 1989 | EP |
1753265 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2827087 | Jan 2015 | EP |
2840340 | Feb 2015 | EP |
3073008 | Sep 2016 | EP |
601855 | May 1948 | GB |
1255292 | Dec 1971 | GB |
2019543 | Oct 1979 | GB |
4307095 | Oct 1992 | JP |
2009106906 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2012001523 | Jan 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for Corresponding EP14178568.3, dated Feb. 16, 2015. |
European Search Report for Corresponding EP14175081.0, dated Dec. 4, 2014. |
“British Help American Wounded: Rehabilitation and Treatment, UK, 1944”, Ministry of Information Second World War Official. |
European Search Report for Corresponding EP14179021.2, dated Feb. 3, 2015. |
European Search Report for Counterpart EP16155782.2, dated Jul. 28, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180031316 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13966577 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 15782426 | US |