An access point (AP) is a device used by wireless clients to connect to a network. An AP functions as a standalone entity in some implementations and functions in cooperation with distribution hardware in other implementations. Distribution hardware may include a wireless switch used to manage APs and provide network-connectivity to wireless clients. A wireless domain may refer to a group of wireless switches that are configured to exchange relevant information, and using this information make informed decisions. A known device is a station (e.g., a wireless AP or client device) that is part of a network wireless installation. A rogue device is a station that is considered harmful for a network wireless installation because it is, for example, violating policies or hampering wireless access to the network.
A traditional approach to rogue detection has been to (1) use a second set of hardware in addition to APs, or (2) provide an integrated network that provides both data services and rogue detection services. The advantage of the first approach is that a user can select the best devices for the job, though this often results in higher capital and operational expenditures. The second approach saves money by using a single network and point of administration, but the user may have to compromise product feature sets because of the need to use a single vendor.
These are but a subset of the problems and issues associated with wireless access point authentication, and are intended to characterize weaknesses in the prior art by way of example. The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations related therewith are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools, and methods that are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope. In various embodiments, one or more of the above-described problems have been reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed to other improvements.
A technique for dynamically responding to threats in a wireless network involves deploying a single network including APs capable of booting from a plurality of software images. Individual APs can switch (or be switched) between multiple sets of software so that network managers can select the AP software most appropriate for a given instance. For example, if a threat is detected, multiple APs can be switched to sensor mode to deal with the threat. As another example, all of the APs can be switched to sensor mode after hours. Alternatively, a server can provide the software image(s) needed for an AP to operate in accordance with a desired functionality.
The proposed system can offer, among other advantages, improved wireless network functionality. This and other advantages of the techniques described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the following descriptions and a study of the several figures of the drawings.
Embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the figures. However, the embodiments and figures are illustrative rather than limiting; they provide examples of the invention.
In the following description, several specific details are presented to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or in combination with other components, etc. In other instances, well-known implementations or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of various embodiments, of the invention.
In the example of
The determination that the station 106 is the rogue 108 may be made at the distribution system 102, or by some other one or more of the multi-boot APs 104 that are configured in, for example, a sensor mode. The multi-boot AP 104-2 can be rebooted with different software that gives the multi-boot 104-2, e.g., sensor functionality to help deal with the rogue 108 with, e.g., countermeasures. In an illustrative embodiment, when the multi-boot AP 104-2 is in sensor mode, no association is possible. Some of the advantages of the system 100 are explored later.
In the example of
In the example of
In another illustrative embodiment, the threshold value may be set, and the risk score may increase based upon activities or events associated with a station. In another illustrative embodiment, the number of APs to convert is also either statically or dynamically configurable. For example, the number of APs converted may be based upon the severity of an event that triggers the conversion. In another illustrative embodiment, multiple APs may be converted for other reasons. For example, if at least three APs are in sensor mode, then triangulation may be facilitated. Additional APs may improve the accuracy of a triangulation technique.
In another illustrative embodiment, the amount of investigation predicted to be required may have a bearing on the number of APs converted. In another illustrative embodiment, the system may convert APs depending upon the location of the event that triggers the conversion. In another illustrative embodiment, the location of the APs may have a bearing upon the choice of APs to convert. In another illustrative embodiment, the amount of load on an AP may have a bearing on whether the AP is converted. For example, if an AP that has a lot of stations associated with it is selected for conversion to a sensor, it may be decided that the conversion is not worth the disruption of service to the associated stations, if any.
In an illustrative embodiment, the memory 302 may be primary memory such as random access memory (RAM). Any applicable known or convenient memory may be used. In an illustrative embodiment, the processor 304 may be a central processing unit (CPU), a microprocessor, or some other processor capable of executing code stored in the memory 302. Any applicable known or convenient processor may be used. In an illustrative embodiment, the radios 306 may be set to work on the same technology/protocol. The radios may have different configurations, such as different channel operations or modes. The radios 306 may also be set to work on different technology/protocols, such as 802.11a for one and 802.11b/g for another. Any known or convenient radio technology may be used.
In an illustrative embodiment, the primary boot 308 is embodied in a computer-readable medium. The computer-readable medium may include, by way of example but not limitation, flash memory. In an illustrative embodiment, the supplemental boots 310 are embodied in a computer-readable medium, as well. In an illustrative embodiment, the network interfaces 312 may include Ethernet interfaces. However, any applicable known or convenient network interfaces could be used.
In an illustrative embodiment that has two boot partitions, boot0 and boot1, the primary boot 308 is the first boot partition, boot0, and a supplemental boot 310-1 is the second boot partition, boot1. (In this illustrative embodiment, there is only one supplemental boot.) The device 300 will first attempt to boot from the boot1. If that fails, or if the boot1 partition is marked bad, it will fall back to boot0.
In a specific implementation, Trapeze Networks software may be loaded into boot0, and third-party software into boot1. That way, the device 300 will boot under control of third-party software. To switch back, the boot1 partition is marked bad, which causes the device 300 to fall back to Trapeze Networks software. In at least one implementation, the Trapeze Networks software is read-only so that the image is always available, but this is an implementation-specific decision. In this implementation, only one third-party software image is provided in boot1, but it can be swapped out for another image.
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
When the command is received at the switch 406, the AP configuration database 414 on the switch 406 is updated to indicate that the AP 408 should use one of the supplemental boot images 412. The switch 406 then provides the appropriate boot image of the supplemental boot images 412 to the AP 408, which the AP 408 stores as boot1.
While the example of
The third party applications 504 include applications that provide functionality to the server 508 that may be of use in a wireless domain. For example, the third party applications 504 may include security applications. The wireless domains 506 provide RF data to the server 508. It should be noted that the switch 510 may be included in one of the wireless domains 506, and may provide RF data (not shown).
The server 508 may include an AP selector 514, a scheduler 516, AP images 518, and a command system 520. The AP selector 514 can receive requests for conversion from multiple sources and unify them. For example, the AP selector 514 may receive input from the third party applications 504, the wireless domains 506 (e.g., in the form of RF data), or from other applicable sources that serve to improve the accuracy of the AP selector 514 (not shown). The AP selector 514 may include an engine for making probabilistic assessments of risk prior to image selection. The AP selector may initially convert a few APs on the first request from a third-party system, and progressively add more if the situation is not resolved. The AP selector 514, after determining a course of action based upon the risk assessment, provides a command to the command system 520.
The scheduler 516 may include a timer that is set according to implementation-specific parameters. For example, the timer may be associated with a running time between conversion of APs, times when an enterprise is open (e.g., switching to network connectivity mode during work hours), or some other schedule. The scheduler 516 provides a command to the command system 520 based upon the configured schedule(s).
The AP images 518 are available to the command system 520. It may be that the AP images 518 are not needed even when an AP image is to be changed. For example, the AP 512 may include multiple boot images, including the image to which the switch 510 (as instructed by the command system 520) attempts to switch the AP 512. It may be that the AP images 518 are needed because the AP 512 can only hold a single image (requiring a new image with each AP image change), or because the AP 512 does not include the image that is needed based upon the desired functionality.
Using techniques described herein, multiple IDS partners may be used for statistical defense against attacks. APs could also be dedicated on-demand to location functions and “spotlighting” particular client devices.
In the example of
In the example of
As used herein, a wireless network refers to any type of wireless network, including but not limited to a structured network or an ad hoc network. Data on a wireless network is often encrypted. However, data may also be sent in the clear, if desired. With encrypted data, a rogue device will have a difficult time learning any information (such as passwords, etc.) from clients before countermeasures are taken to deal with the rogue. The rogue may be able to confuse the client, and perhaps obtain some encrypted data, but the risk is minimal (even less than for some wired networks).
As used herein, access point (AP) refers to receiving points for any known or convenient wireless access technology. Specifically, the term AP is not intended to be limited to 802.11 APs.
Some portions of the detailed description are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of operations leading to a desired result. The operations are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “determining” or “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
The algorithms and techniques described herein also relate to apparatus for performing the algorithms and techniques. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-optical disks, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus.
It should be noted that not all technologies include the term AP in the literature. For example, SGSN technology does not refer to an access point as an “AP.” However, all wireless access technologies require something comparable (i.e., a node at which wireless communications are received and/or transmitted). For example, an independent basic service set (BSS) includes stations that access the service area by directly communicating with one another; thus, the access nodes are the stations themselves. Accordingly, AP is considered to be generally applicable to any technology, regardless of actual verbiage used to describe a BSS with equivalent functionality.
As used herein, the term “embodiment” means an embodiment that serves to illustrate by way of example but not limitation.
It will be appreciated to those skilled in the art that the preceding examples and embodiments are exemplary and not limiting to the scope of the present invention. It is intended that all permutations, enhancements, equivalents, and improvements thereto that are apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings are included within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims include all such modifications, permutations and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/877,907, filed Dec. 28, 2006, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3641433 | Mifflin et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
4168400 | De Couasnon et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4176316 | DeRosa et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4247908 | Lockhart et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4291401 | Bachmann | Sep 1981 | A |
4291409 | Weinberg et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4409470 | Shepard et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4460120 | Shepard et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4475208 | Ricketts | Oct 1984 | A |
4494238 | Groth, Jr. | Jan 1985 | A |
4500987 | Hasegawa | Feb 1985 | A |
4503533 | Tobagi et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4550414 | Guinon et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4562415 | McBiles | Dec 1985 | A |
4630264 | Wah | Dec 1986 | A |
4635221 | Kerr | Jan 1987 | A |
4639914 | Winters | Jan 1987 | A |
4644523 | Horwitz | Feb 1987 | A |
4672658 | Kavehrad | Jun 1987 | A |
4673805 | Shepard et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4707839 | Andren et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4730340 | Frazier | Mar 1988 | A |
4736095 | Shepard et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4740792 | Sagey et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4758717 | Shepard et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760586 | Takeda | Jul 1988 | A |
4789983 | Acampora et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4829540 | Waggener et al. | May 1989 | A |
4850009 | Zook et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4872182 | McRae et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4894842 | Broekhoven et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4901307 | Gilhousen et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4933952 | Albrieux et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4933953 | Yagi | Jun 1990 | A |
4995053 | Simpson et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5008899 | Yamamoto | Apr 1991 | A |
5029183 | Tymes | Jul 1991 | A |
5103459 | Gilhousen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5103461 | Tymes | Apr 1992 | A |
5109390 | Gilhousen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5142550 | Tymes | Aug 1992 | A |
5151919 | Dent | Sep 1992 | A |
5157687 | Tymes | Oct 1992 | A |
5187575 | Dent et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5231633 | Hluchyj et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5280498 | Tymes et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5285494 | Sprecher et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5329531 | Diepstraten | Jul 1994 | A |
5339316 | Diepstraten | Aug 1994 | A |
5371783 | Rose et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5418812 | Reyes et al. | May 1995 | A |
5450615 | Fortune et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5465401 | Thompson | Nov 1995 | A |
5479441 | Tymes et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5483676 | Mahany et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488569 | Kaplan | Jan 1996 | A |
5491644 | Pickering et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5517495 | Lund | May 1996 | A |
5519762 | Bartlett | May 1996 | A |
5528621 | Heiman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5561841 | Markus | Oct 1996 | A |
5568513 | Croft et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584048 | Wieczorek | Dec 1996 | A |
5598532 | Liron | Jan 1997 | A |
5630207 | Gitlin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640414 | Blakeney et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649289 | Wang et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5668803 | Tymes et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5774460 | Schiffel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5793303 | Koga | Aug 1998 | A |
5794128 | Brockel et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812589 | Sealander et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815811 | Pinard et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828960 | Tang et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838907 | Hansen | Nov 1998 | A |
5844900 | Hong et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5872968 | Knox et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875179 | Tikalsky | Feb 1999 | A |
5887259 | Zicker et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896561 | Schrader et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5915214 | Reece et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920821 | Seazholtz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933607 | Tate et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949988 | Feisullin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953669 | Stratis et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960335 | Umemoto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5982779 | Krishnakumar et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987062 | Engwer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987328 | Ephremides et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991817 | Rowett et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005853 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011784 | Brown | Jan 2000 | A |
6041240 | McCarthy et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6078568 | Wright | Jun 2000 | A |
6088591 | Trompower | Jul 2000 | A |
6101539 | Kennelly et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118771 | Tajika et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119009 | Baranger et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6160804 | Ahmed et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6188649 | Fine et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199032 | Anderson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208629 | Jaszewski et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208841 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218930 | Katzenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240078 | Kuhnel et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240083 | Wright | May 2001 | B1 |
6256300 | Ahmed et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256334 | Adachi | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262988 | Vig | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285662 | Watanabe | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304596 | Yamano et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317599 | Rappaport et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336035 | Somoza et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336152 | Richman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347091 | Wallentin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356758 | Almeida et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6393290 | Ufongene | May 2002 | B1 |
6404772 | Beach et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6473449 | Cafarella et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493679 | Rappaport et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496290 | Lee | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512916 | Forbes, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6580700 | Pinard et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587680 | Ala-Laurila et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614787 | Jain et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624762 | End, III | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625454 | Rappaport et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6661787 | Jain et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631267 | Thomson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6659947 | Rappaport et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687498 | McKenna et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697415 | Mahany | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6725260 | Philyaw | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6760324 | Scott et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6747961 | Ahmed et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6839338 | Amara et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6839348 | Tang et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6879812 | Rappaport et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6957067 | Iyer et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6973622 | Rappaport et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978301 | Tindal | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7020438 | Sinivaara et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020773 | Otway et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7024394 | Ashour et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7062566 | Amara et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068999 | Ballai | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7110756 | Diener | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116979 | Backes et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146166 | Backes et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155518 | Forslow | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7221927 | Kolar et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224970 | Smith et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7263366 | Miyashita | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280495 | Zweig et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7317914 | Adya et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324468 | Fischer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324487 | Saito | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7359676 | Hrastar | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370362 | Olson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376080 | Riddle et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7421248 | Laux et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7466678 | Cromer et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7489648 | Griswold | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7509096 | Palm et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529925 | Harkins | May 2009 | B2 |
7551619 | Tiwari | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7573859 | Taylor | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7577453 | Matta | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7788475 | Zimmer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010024953 | Balogh | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020052205 | Belostofsky et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020060995 | Cervello et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069278 | Forslow | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095486 | Bahl | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101868 | Clear et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020176437 | Busch et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191572 | Weinstein et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014646 | Buddhikot et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018889 | Burnett et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055959 | Sato | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030107590 | Levillain et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030134642 | Kostic et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135762 | Macaulay | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030174706 | Shankar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030227934 | White et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003285 | Whelan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019857 | Teig et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025044 | Day | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040053632 | Nikkelen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062267 | Minami et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064560 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068668 | Lor et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040095914 | Katsube et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095932 | Astarabadi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040143428 | Rappaport et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165545 | Cook | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040208570 | Reader | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040047320 | Eglin | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040120370 | Tzamaloukas | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221042 | Meier | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230370 | Tzamaloukas | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236702 | Fink et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255167 | Knight | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259555 | Rappaport et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050030929 | Swier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037818 | Seshadri et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054326 | Rogers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058132 | Okano et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059406 | Thomson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064873 | Karaoguz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068925 | Palm et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073980 | Thomson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097618 | Arling et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122977 | Lieberman | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128989 | Bhagwat et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050157730 | Grant et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180358 | Kolar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181805 | Gallagher | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193103 | Drabik | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223111 | Bhandaru et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239461 | Verma et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240665 | Gu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245269 | Demirhan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259597 | Benedetto et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050059405 | Rappaport et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273442 | Bennett | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276218 | Ooghe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060045050 | Floros et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060104224 | Singh et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060128415 | Horikoshi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161983 | Cothrell et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174336 | Chen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189311 | Cromer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200862 | Olson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060245393 | Bajic | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060248331 | Harkins | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274774 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060276192 | Dutta et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025265 | Porras et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070064718 | Ekl et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070937 | Demirhan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083924 | Lu | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086378 | Matta et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091889 | Xiao et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070189222 | Kolar et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070260720 | Morain | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080008117 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013481 | Simons et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014916 | Chen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080056200 | Johnson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080056211 | Kim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080096575 | Aragon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107077 | Murphy | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114784 | Murphy | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117822 | Murphy et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080151844 | Tiwari | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090031044 | Barrack et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090198999 | Harkins | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2429080 | Feb 2007 | GB |
WO 9403986 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO-9403986 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO 9911003 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-9911003 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 03085544 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-03085544 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004095192 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004095800 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2004095192 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2004095800 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080162921 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60877907 | Dec 2006 | US |