Patent Grant
10043170
1. Field
The present invention generally relates to communications between remote computing devices and servers. More particularly, the invention relates to the creation and sending of billing events between a server and a remote client device.
2. Background
Advances in technology have resulted in smaller and more powerful personal computing devices. For example, there currently exist a variety of portable personal computing devices, including wireless computing devices, such as portable wireless telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs) and paging devices that are each small, lightweight, and can be easily carried by users. More specifically, the portable wireless telephones, for example, further include cellular telephones that communicate voice and data packets over wireless networks. Further, many such cellular telephones are being manufactured with relatively large increases in computing capabilities, and as such, are becoming tantamount to small personal computers and hand-held PDAs. However, these smaller and more powerful personal computing devices are typically severely resource constrained. For example, the screen size, amount of available memory and file system space, amount of input and output capabilities and processing capability may each be limited by the small size of the device, and in particular, the small size of the user input unit, e.g., the keyboard. Because of such severe resource constraints, it is often typically desirable, for example, to maintain a limited size and quantity of software applications and other information residing on such remote personal computing devices (client devices).
Some of the personal computing devices utilize application programming interfaces (APIs), sometimes referred to as runtime environments and software platforms, that are installed onto their local computer platform and which are used, for example, to simplify operations of such devices, such as by providing generalized calls for device specific resources. Further, some such APIs are also known to provide software developers the ability to create software applications that are fully executable on such devices. In addition, some of such APIs are known to be operationally located between the computing device system software and the software applications such that the computing device computing functionality is made available to the software applications without requiring the software developer to have the specific computing device system source code. Further, some APIs are known to provide mechanisms for secure communications between such personal devices (i.e., clients) and remote devices (i.e., servers) using secure cryptographic information.
Examples of such APIs, some of which are discussed in more detail below, include versions of the Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless® (BREW®) developed by QUALCOMM Incorporated, of San Diego, Calif. BREW® can cooperate with a computing device's (e.g., a wireless cellular phone) operating system, and can, among other features, provide interfaces to hardware features particularly found on personal computing devices. BREW® can also provide these interfaces on such personal computing devices at a relatively low cost with respect to demands on device resources and with respect to the price paid by consumers for devices containing the BREW® API. Additional features of BREW® include its end-to-end software distribution platform that provides a variety of benefits for wireless service operators, software developers and computing device consumers. At least one such currently available end-to-end software distribution platform includes logic distributed over a server-client architecture, where the server performs, for example, billing, security and application distribution functionality, and the client performs, for example, application execution, security and user interface functionality.
The enhanced computing capabilities and security features in client devices has enabled applications to be purchased directly from a carrier network and downloaded and installed on a client device. Once an application is purchased, a remote billing system can automatically generate billing to a subscriber/account associated with the client device and can distribute the appropriate payment to the developers/publishers. However, current wireless server-client systems provide for limited purchased options. Typically, a one-time purchase or a fixed number of uses can be purchased for a desired application or content. This results in limited flexibility for developers and content providers to package or up-sell their applications.
The foregoing description of the related art is merely intended to provide an overview of some of the known uses of APIs and as an introduction to the BREW® platform, which can be used in embodiments of the invention. However, the invention is not to be construed as being limited to a specific implementation, operating platform or environment.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are directed to systems and methods for generating and processing client device generated billing requests in a wireless network.
Accordingly, an embodiment of the invention can include a method for application-based billing in a wireless subscriber billing system, the method comprising: generating a billing request within a client device; transmitting the billing request including a subscriber identification (SID) to the billing system; generating a validation response to the billing request at the billing system; and transmitting the validation response to the client device.
Another embodiment of the invention can include an apparatus comprising: a wireless client device, including an application configured to generate and transmit a billing request and configured to receive a validation response; a billing server configured to receive the billing request and transmit the validation response; and validation logic configured to generate the validation response in response to the billing request.
Another embodiment of the invention can include a client device comprising: a transceiver capable of wirelessly transmitting and receiving data; a user interface; and an application configured to generate a billing request; to transmit the billing request to a billing system using the transceiver; and to receive a validation response associated with the billing request from the billing system.
Another embodiment of the invention can include a billing system comprising: a transceiver capable of wirelessly transmitting and receiving data; a billing server operably coupled to the transceiver, wherein the billing server is configured to receive a billing request including a subscriber ID (SID) from a client device and to transmit a validation response to the client device; and validation logic configured to generate the validation response in response to the billing request.
Another embodiment of the invention can include a computer-readable medium on which is stored a computer program for wirelessly communicating application-based billing requests, the computer program comprising instructions which, when executed by at least one computing device on a wireless client device, causes the computing device to perform the process of: generating a billing request at the wireless client device; transmitting the billing request to a billing system; and receiving a validation response associated with the billing request from the billing system.
Another embodiment of the invention can include a billing system, comprising: means for generating a billing request within a client device; means for transmitting the billing request including a subscriber identification (SID) to a billing server; means for generating a validation response to the billing request at the billing server; and means for transmitting the validation response to the client device.
A more complete appreciation of embodiments of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings which are presented solely for illustration and not limitation of the invention, and in which:
Aspects of the invention are disclosed in the following description and related drawings directed to specific embodiments of the invention. Alternate embodiments may be devised without departing from the scope of the invention. Additionally, well-known elements of the invention will not be described in detail or will be omitted so as not to obscure the relevant details of the invention.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments. Likewise, the term “embodiments of the invention” does not require that all embodiments of the invention include the discussed feature, advantage or mode of operation.
Further, many embodiments are described in terms of sequences of actions to be performed by, for example, elements of a computing device. It will be recognized that various actions described herein can be performed by specific circuits (e.g., application specific integrated circuits (ASICs)), by program instructions being executed by one or more processors, or by a combination of both. Additionally, these sequence of actions described herein can be considered to be embodied entirely within any form of computer readable storage medium having stored therein a corresponding set of computer instructions that upon execution would cause an associated processor to perform the functionality described herein. Thus, the various aspects of the invention may be embodied in a number of different forms, all of which have been contemplated to be within the scope of the claimed subject matter. In addition, for each of the embodiments described herein, the corresponding form of any such embodiments may be described herein as, for example, “logic configured to” perform the described action.
One or more embodiments of the invention can be used in conjunction with a runtime environment (e.g., API) executing on the computing device. One such runtime environment (API) is Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless® (BREW®) software previously discussed. However, one or more embodiments of the invention can be used with other types of runtime environments (APIs) that, for example, operate to control the execution of applications on wireless client computing devices. Additionally, “API” is intended to be construed broadly as a stand alone program or portion of a program that is used to achieve a particular function and can be used interchangeably with the terms “application”, “program”, “routine”, “instructions” and “applet”.
The billing server (BDS) 106 is shown here on a network 116 with other computer elements in communication with the wireless network 104. There can be additional stand alone servers (e.g., stand-alone server 122), and each server can provide separate services and processes to the client devices 102, 108, 110, 112 across the wireless network 104. There is preferably also at least one stored transaction database 118 that holds records of billing related transactions from wireless devices 102, 108, 110, 112. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the configuration illustrated in
In
The carrier network 200 controls messages (typically sent as data packets) sent to a messaging service controller (“MSC”) 202. The carrier network 200 communicates with the MSC 202 by a network, the Internet and/or a public switched telephone network (PSTN). Typically, the network or Internet connection between the carrier network 200 and the MSC 202 transfers data, and the PSTN transfers voice information. The MSC 202 can be connected to multiple base stations (“BTS”) 204. In a similar manner to the carrier network, the MSC 202 is typically connected to the BTS 204 by a network, the Internet and/or PSTN for data transfer and/or voice information. The BTS 204 can broadcast data messages wirelessly to the client devices, such as client device 102, by short messaging service (“SMS”), or other over-the-air (OTA) methods known in the art.
The client device 300, e.g., a cellular telephone, has a computer platform 206 that can receive and execute software applications and transmit billing requests from an application to the billing server 106. Additionally, client device 300 can communicate with application download server 130. The computer platform 206 can include an application specific integrated circuit (“ASIC” 208), or other processor, microprocessor, logic circuit, or other data processing device. The ASIC 208 or other processor executes the application programming interface (“API”) 210 layer that interfaces with any resident programs in the memory 212 of the wireless device. The memory 212 can be comprised of read-only or random-access memory (RAM and ROM), EEPROM, flash cards, or any memory common to computer platforms. The API 210 (e.g., BREW®) also has operating thereon an application-based value billing (AVB) application 310 containing logic configured to process special billing requests from the client device to the billing server 106, via carrier network 200. The computer platform 206 also can include a local database 214 that can hold applications not actively used in memory 212. The local database 214 is typically a flash memory cell, but can be any secondary storage device as known in the art, such as magnetic media, EEPROM, optical media, tape, soft or hard disk, or the like.
The wireless client device 300, such as a cellular telephone, has installed on it, or otherwise downloads, one or more software applications, such as games, news, stock monitors, and the like. For example, the client device 300 may receive one or more software applications downloaded from the application download server 130. The software applications may be stored on the local database 214 when not in use. The client device 300 or other wireless computing device may upload resident applications stored on the local database 214 to memory 212 for execution on the API 210 when so desired by the user or invoked by another API. In this manner, in one embodiment, an AVB application 310 can be loaded on client device 300 for execution of the application and generation of billing requests to the billing server 106.
As used herein the terms “client device”, “wireless device”, “wireless computing device”, “client computing device” and variations thereof are interchangeable and each includes, for example, one or more processing circuits executing resident configured logic, where such computing devices include, for example, microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs), microcontrollers, portable wireless telephones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and paging devices, or any suitable combination of hardware, software and/or firmware containing processors and logic configured to at least perform the operations described herein directed to billing information communicated between a client device 300 and a billing server 106. The client device 300 can be serviced by at least one remote billing server 106 with respect to processing the billing requests generated at the client device 300. Some examples of client devices which may be used in accordance with embodiments of the present invention include cellular telephones or other wireless communication units, PDAs, paging devices, handheld navigation devices, handheld gaming devices, music or video content download units, and other like wireless communication devices.
The wireless communication between the client device 300 and the BTS 204 can be based on different technologies, such as code division multiplexed access (CDMA), time division multiplexed access (TDMA), frequency division multiplexed access (FDMA), the global system for mobile communications (GSM), or other protocols that may be used in a wireless communications network or a data communications network. The data communication is typically between the client device 300, BTS 204, and MSC 202. The MSC 202 can be connected to multiple data networks such as the carrier network 200, PSTN, the Internet, a virtual private network, and the like, thus allowing the client device access to a broader communication network. As discussed in the foregoing, in addition to voice transmission, data can be transmitted to the client device via SMS or other OTA methods known in the art.
Developers have invested extensive efforts to create consumer affinity for their applications and brands. Many developers believe customers would be willing to make incremental purchases beyond just an initial buy of an application, providing more value to consumers and creating new revenue opportunities for, developers, publishers, and wireless operators. For example, developers can generate applications that include additional features (e.g., improved weapons or additional levels in a game) that can be enabled by a separate purchase from the initial application purchase. Accordingly, a developer can derive increased revenue from these application-based purchases. In addition some applications, such as ringer managers, actually use content (e.g., the ringers themselves, which can be music from recording artists and the like). This content can also be purchased and delivered to the client device and can be installed on the client device in separate transactions. The billing and enabling of the requested service (e.g., addition weapon or delivery of content) can be separate events.
To facilitate an understanding of the disclosure, definitions are provided for some of the terms. Generally, an application is a software program that performs actions based on consumer direction and interaction. Thus, an application potentially behaves differently each time it is used.
A handler is an application that supports rendering of content. It is typically pre-installed on a device and can support one or more content types. Typically, a handler does not interact with the consumer but instead works behind the scenes to launch the content. However, some handlers support simple interaction with a consumer, such as, “Do you want to make this ringer your default?”
Content (or static content) is generally a software file that is displayed to the consumer via an application, interpreter, or handler. The content file typically does not contain any conditional/executable software logic. Typical content types include pictures, videos, browser pages, ringers, and text files.
An application-based value billing (AVB) request is a billing request that is generated in an application on a client device. The AVB request may also be referred to as a value billing request or simply a billing request. Likewise, the billing event generated from the AVB request may be referred to as an AVB event, a value billing event, or simply a billing event.
The foregoing definitions are basic and should not be considered all-inclusive. For example, an application can perform actions based on specific device parameters and settings in addition to consumer/subscriber interaction. Accordingly, other aspects of the terms are within the intended scope of the definitions and invention, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Referring to
As noted above, the billing services can be extended directly to the AVB application 310. Accordingly, AVB application 310 can initiate billing events after the initial application download transaction, in which the AVB application 310 is downloaded. The AVB application 310 may offer additional services (post-application download) for an additional cost to the subscriber/consumer. Because of the financial implications, these billing-enabled applications (e.g., AVB application 310) can use special protected application interfaces that relate to billing on the BDS 106. For example, AVB applications can access and use billing interfaces, download interfaces, and mutual authentication interfaces to utilize billing via BDS 106. These interfaces can be accessed via calls to AVB extension 315, which can be distributed to developers for integration with applications, as discussed in greater detail below.
AVB applications generate value billing for services in numerous ways. For example, gaming developers can provide services beyond the basic applications. These services may be incremental and range from enhanced levels of games, e.g., new golf courses in golf games, to more features, and the like. Typically, these services are offered to the subscriber through the AVB application 310. After the subscriber confirms the purchase, the AVB application 310 can initiate a billing request and transmit the billing request to BDS 106 for processing and billing the purchase. This capability offers the flexibility for application developers to appeal to a broader audience with a lower entry application cost and/or differentiated pricing for services while running the AVB application 310.
Another example can be a ring tone shopping application. Currently, typical ring tone applications utilize the purchase/number of uses pricing model. A use equates to one ring tone download. However, using an AVB application 310 and value billing at BDS 106, the ring tone supplier can differentiate pricing across ring tones. For example, popular ring tones may be priced differently from other ring tones.
Additionally, an AVB application can be priced as a monthly subscription with embedded value billing services billed as incremental charges based on the billing requests generated by the AVB application. The value billing charges generated by the AVB application can be handled independently from the AVB application charge (e.g., a one time download charge for installing the AVB application on a client device). Typically, each value billing request is considered a one-time purchase event, and there does not have to be a billing relationship between the value billing event and a download event from BDS.
The AVB application 310 can set the billing attributes to include among other items, a billing description and a billing amount, e.g., customer list price (CLP), and other billing data that is associated with the subscriber ID (SID) associated with the client device 300 and the AVB application 310 that generated the billing request (AVB request). This billing data is sent to the BDS 106, in the AVB request. The AVB request can be processed and validated utilizing validation logic 330. Validation logic 330 can be configured by the carrier/operator and is used to approve or deny the AVB request. For example, an operator may issue a denial of AVB requests with billing amounts greater than fifty dollars, or may issue a denial of AVB requests from specific SIDs. Additionally, the validation logic 330 may access prepay interfaces, if the SID is associated with a prepay account, to check the balance in the prepay account for sufficient funds, for example. Once the AVB request has been approved, an AVB billing event can be propagated through the BDS 106. Additionally, AVB billing events can be included in reports to the operator and/or developer for bill processing, customer service support, business intelligence, payment reconciliation support, and the like.
The AVB application 310 can be pre-installed on the client device 300 or downloaded in a conventional manner. For example, the consumer/subscriber can browse a catalog, select and purchase an AVB application 310 for download. The consumer can then be asked to confirm the purchase, and can be notified that there may be additional service/content fees associated with the AVB application 310. The AVB application 310 can then be downloaded and the purchase transaction logged, in a conventional manner. Then, at some point during the use of the AVB application 310, it can present the opportunity to purchase a “value-added service”. The AVB application 310 can utilize carrier, platform, language, prepay information, and/or environment (e.g., BREW® 3.0) to determine relevant value-added services available and pricing. The AVB application 310 can display to the consumer additional priced services, for example, a new weapon for $0.25 or an MP3 song for $1.00. The value-added items and prices can be stored locally as part of the core application and/or the AVB application 310 can connect to a developer's content server 390 or other remote server.
As discussed above, the service (value-added service) could already be in AVB application 310 (e.g., extra level of a game) or require a connection to a content server 390. The AVB application 310 can then request consumer billing authorization (i.e., generate an AVB request). The client device 300 contacts the BDS 106 for purchase approval (e.g., makes a network connection). The BDS 106 responds with approval or denial, or there is no response. Based on the response, the AVB application 310 can unlock the local service, contact the content server 390, or deny the service requested. The AVB application 310 can mark the transaction as pending or abandon the transaction if there is no response, after a predetermined time and/or number of retries. The client device 300/AVB application 310 can contact the content server 390, if it needs content not present in the AVB application 310. If the AVB application 310 cannot retrieve the content, the application can queue for a retry since the service purchase was committed. Typically, once the billing request is approved, a billing event is generated and propagated through the BDS 106 and the subscriber bill is generated.
At least one embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In contrast, to achieve a similar functionality using conventional systems, the application developer would need to generate different applications for each feature and/or pricing level and make them available for download. Conventional systems record the billing information and process the settlements for each application downloaded. This process is controlled by the carrier and to purchase each application the client device would have to connect to the carrier network to browse the application catalog and purchase the desired application with the desired features.
In at least one embodiment of the invention, as stated above, the shopping experience is conducted at the client device 300. Accordingly, after a purchase option is presented and accepted at the client device 300, a billing request is generated within the client device 300. The billing request includes information used to process the billing transaction (e.g., SID) and can be transmitted to a remote billing server (e.g., BDS 106). The billing request is received at the BDS 106 and processed. A validation response is generated by validation logic 330 in response to the billing request at the BDS 106. Then, the validation response is transmitted to the client device 300.
The validation response can be an approval of the billing request or a denial of the billing request. Once the client device receives the response, it can process the validation response. For example, the service (e.g., enabling an additional feature of a game) linked to the billing request can be activated, if the validation response is positive. Likewise, if the billing request is denied, an indication of the denial of the billing request can be displayed on the client device. Optionally, additional information can be included in the denial, such as the reason why the request was denied (e.g., insufficient funds).
In at least one embodiment, the BDS 106 can leverage existing billing components to facilitate implementation of an application-based value billing system. For example, in
Typically, as stated above, the billing request can include or be associated with the SID, a short description of the service requested (short description), and a price for the service (CLP). Additional information can also be transmitted with the billing request including at least one of application ID, transaction ID, submit time, create time, currency, long description, payee ID, vendor data, SID hash, platform, language, environment (e.g., BREW® 3.0) and the like. The additional data can be used by the operator and/or the developer as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
For example, the transaction ID can be a unique code used to prevent multiple billing events for the same billing request/transaction. In the wireless environment, interruptions in the communication paths can cause disruption of the data communication between the billing server and client device. Accordingly, a billing request could be received and approved by the billing server, but the approval may not be received by the client device. The transaction ID can then be used to prevent duplicate billing, if the client device resubmits the billing request, since the transaction ID will be the same for both requests.
Further, the SID hash can be a unique identifier associate with the SID, but not identifiable back to the SID. The SID hash can then be transmitted to developers/or other third parties for added business/marketing intelligence without jeopardizing the privacy of the subscriber associated with the SID. For example, using a SID hash, it is possible to determine that a particular subscriber purchased multiple value services from an AVB application. However, the SID hash prevents the identification of that particular subscriber.
Additionally, in embodiments of the invention, the validation logic 330 can perform additional checks to approve the billing request. For example, if the subscriber pricing plan is a prepay plan, the prepay balance can be checked to see if there is sufficient funds to purchase the service requested. If there are sufficient funds, then the approval is transmitted to the client device. However, if there are not sufficient funds, then the billing request is denied, even though the billing request itself is valid. Once the billing request is ultimately approved by the validation logic 330/billing server 106, the approval is transmitted to the client device 300 for processing by the AVB application 310 that generated the billing request.
Upon transmitting the approval to the client device 300, the transaction data is communicated to transaction manager (TXN) 340, which is configured to receive the transaction data. The TXN 340 can optionally associate additional billing information not included with the transaction data from the billing request. For example, the transaction data can contain the SID, description of the service requested (short description), and a price (e.g., CLP). The TXN 340 can associate additional data to complete the billing process (e.g., description of the item, application ID, pricing plan, and the like). Alternatively, the TXN 340 can process and pass through the transaction data received without any addition or modification. The TXN 340 then communicates this information as a billing event to a client billing module 350 and a settlement module 360. The client billing module 350 can be configured to receive the billing event from the TXN 340 and generate a bill to a subscriber associated with the SID and client device 300. The settlement module 360 can also be configured to receive the billing event from the TXN 340, to invoice the carrier/operator, receive payment from the carrier/operator and to pay a service supplier (e.g., developer, content provider, publisher and the like).
The billing event can be created and processed in a similar manner to conventional application download transactions, once the transaction data has been generated. For example, transaction data associated with the billing request/service purchased can be stored in the TXN 340 and/or related database (transaction database 118). The transaction data may include a subset of metadata stored in the TXN 340 or a related database and additional information included by other devices and/or systems. Billing events can be created in the TXN 340 by correlating the metadata and the transaction data or can be based solely on the transaction data received from the AVB application 310. Once a billing event is generated, it can be communicated along with the related reporting data (e.g., vendor data) and processed by the billing module 350 and settlement module 360, as discussed above. At least some data included in the billing request may not be processed. For example, the vendor data can be pass through data that is not processed other than to propagate the vendor data through the BDS 106 and/or related components.
Although illustrated as part of a common billing server/system BDS 106, the various components illustrated (e.g., validation logic 330, TXN 340, billing module 350 and settlement module 360) and/or functionalities described can be separated or combined as desired. Additionally, the various components and/or functionalities described can optionally reside on separate servers/computing devices that are operably coupled to each other via a wired or wireless network, Internet, PSTN, other known communication systems and combinations thereof.
The developer then builds an AVB application that incorporates a value-added service that can be sensitive to the active carrier, platform, language, prepay, and SID. Price management can be integrated into the AVB application as well as value billing transaction management services (AVB extension). The AVB application can be tested by the developer utilizing operating environment test tools (e.g., BREW® value-added test tools), block 420.
The application can then be submitted to a third-party test center or an operator test center with supplemental information that describes the value-added billing services and transaction management behavior of the AVB application. The test center can test and/or augment the AVB application for value billing. For example, the test center can verify that the AVB application transaction management appropriately handles approved, denied and no response condition from the BDS. In addition, the test center can exercise a subset of the value billing services to verify the interaction with a graphic user interface (GUI) on the client device. Platform (e.g., device type/operating system) and subscription based testing may also be included to examine the effect on value-added service offerings by platform and prepay/subscription type to certify the AVB application, block 430.
While the application is under development and/or during the test cycle, the developer and operator can discuss the AVB application, the value-added services, and the pricing of the AVB application and the value-added services. The operator may require a service level agreement (SLA) with the developer for uptime on network server access and price range agreements. After the AVB application is distributed, the developer may in some cases change the service pricing using a networked server (e.g., content server 390). However, the operators may require pricing within an agreed price range, block 440.
The AVB application pricing can be agreed to by the operator, who then can add the application to a catalog of applications available on the operator's network. As discussed above, once the AVB application is available in the operator's catalog for distribution, subscribers can browse for the AVB application and download the application, block 450.
After the application is distributed, the developer can manage the value-added services and associated pricing, if a network/content server controlled by the developer is used in the value-added services. As the AVB application generates value billing requests that are processed and approved, the developer can receive payments and AVB related reports from the BDS. Reports can be generated by the BDS that provides usage information for each value billing event and any associated adjustments, payments that relate to value billing services, and the like. For example, the BDS can generate payments based on the value billing services independently. Alternatively, the payments can be included in a lump sum with other developer payments, such as payments for application downloads. If payments are received in a lump sum, the payment report or other reports from the BDS can be used to identify AVB-based payments, block 460.
In addition to the billing data, vendor data can be transmitted with the billing request and propagated through the billing system. The data in the vendor data can be included with the developer report to provide the information programmed by the developer to correspond with particular AVB-based billing requests/purchases. For example, the data could indicate the number of uses of an application or feature, before a particular value-based service request was made. This data can be used with the other reporting data to allow developers to derive significant business intelligence from the AVB events, which can be used for pricing decisions, application design, features to enhance/remove, and the like.
From an operator perspective, AVB applications allow for new revenue opportunities. However, operator distribution control points that exist with application downloads may be modified. For example, the AVB application controls offering value-added services to the consumer and setting the list price. Typically, in the conventional access of applications from an operator's catalog, the operator controls the catalog and the consumer pricing of all the applications. For AVB applications, the operator does not have the same systematic consumer/subscriber shopping control. However, the operators can enforce control through direct discussions with developers (e.g., 440). Additionally, the validation logic (e.g., 330) can be controlled by the operator, so control over approving a billing request can still be exercised, even though pricing and other aspects are not directly controlled. As such, for value billing requests, the BDS 106 provides the operator avenues to validate all value billing requests through operator interfaces (e.g., validation logic 330).
Upon acceptance of a value billing application into the parts list (e.g., list of items available for download), the operator can identify the AVB application because it has a dependency on the privileged value billing extensions. For AVB applications, each operator can optionally perform additional pre-commercial testing on the application to be satisfied with the GUI, pricing, performance, and value-added services that will be exposed to its subscribers. Due to varying business decisions of each operator/carrier, it is possible for an AVB application to pass the testing center tests, but not meet operator-specific guidelines for value billing. Accordingly, as part of the operator negotiation 440, developers should review each operator's guidelines to determine how to work with each specific operator on AVB applications.
As discussed above, the validation logic can be used to determine if a billing request is approved or denied. The validation logic can rely on various operator interfaces pertinent to value billing on the BDS (e.g., user authorization, validation transaction, and prepay service). User authorization can be used by the operator to approve or deny value billing requests at the SID level. For example, an operator may cap the value billing based an operator-defined threshold (e.g., fifty dollars). After the threshold is reached, the operator may then deny subsequent value billing requests for an indefinite or finite period of time, e.g., the remainder of the month. The validation transaction can be used by the operator to include any additional validation tests on the value billing request prior to prepay processing or returning an approved response. This additional validation logic may include, for example, verifying the billing amount does not exceed a threshold value for a single value billing event (e.g., ten dollars). Another example includes verifying that the requesting AVB application is not on an operator's value billing exclusion list due to post-distribution service and pricing disputes (or disapproved for other reasons). Functional formatting checks can also be made, such as, verifying the billing amount is in the appropriate decimal precision. A prepay interface can be used by the operator to invoke prepay services (e.g., authorization and debit of prepay balance), which is similar to conventional prepay services.
In addition to the operator interfaces (e.g., validation logic), additional billing integration for processing consumer/subscriber billing and developer payment can be added, for value billing events. Although an operator can leverage much of an existing billing system, the AVB system has many billing integration aspects. For example, the AVB billing events can be treated as a distinct billing event type from application download billing events. In addition, adjustments performed against AVB billing events can result in transaction adjustment events referencing the adjusted AVB transaction ID (unique code representing the AVB transaction, as discussed above). For example, a short description of the purchased service can be passed from the AVB application, since the service is typically not in the operator's catalog. Also, the billing amount passed from the value billing application can be included as the price billed to the subscriber.
The adjustment services can support online or off-line adjustment processing, which can include AVB billing events. However, typically a requested service is not associated with a part number in an operator's catalog. Accordingly, a customer service representative can view the AVB application that logged the value billing event by part name and part number, but the value service itself is defined by the application and specified in the billing description. Accordingly, a long description can optionally be included in the AVB billing request that can provide greater detail than the short description regarding the AVB transaction. The long description is typically only available for customer service access and is not typically included in the reports and subscriber billing. Adjustments on AVB billing events can be validated against the similar adjustment rules as other types of billing events (e.g., download and subscription billing events), including using similar adjustment periods.
In view of the foregoing disclosure, those skilled in the art will recognize that embodiments of the invention include methods of performing the sequence of actions, operations and/or functions discussed herein. For example,
Referring to
Likewise, a non-limiting example of processing the validation response 700 is illustrated in
An application may not enable some or any services prior to receiving the validation response. Accordingly, as illustrated in
Once again, the foregoing discussion and related illustration are merely examples of aspects of the invention and the invention is not limited to these examples. Further, other methods and alternatives can be recognized by those skilled in the art, and the illustrated examples are not intended as limiting of the methods disclosed herein.
In further embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the foregoing methods illustrated and those disclosed herein can be implemented by the execution of a program embodied on a computer readable medium, such as the memory of a computer platform. The instructions can reside in various types of signal-bearing or data storage primary, secondary, or tertiary media. The media may comprise, for example, RAM accessible by, or residing within, the client device and/or server. Whether contained in RAM, a diskette, or other secondary storage media, the instructions may be stored on a variety of machine-readable data storage media, such as DASD storage (e.g., a conventional “hard drive” or a RAID array), magnetic tape, electronic read-only memory (e.g., ROM, or EEPROM), flash memory cards, an optical storage device (e.g. CD-ROM, WORM, DVD, digital optical tape), paper “punch” cards, or other suitable data storage media including digital and analog transmission media.
The application-based value billing (AVB) system described in the foregoing description can be used to open new revenue opportunities for both operators and developers. Additionally, it can allow consumers/subscribers to have increased control and choice in what they buy and do. Content support allows consumers to customize their experience while using applications on client devices. Accordingly, consumers can utilize these value-added offerings to be more productive with their time, whether navigating through traffic or managing contacts, and to enhance their enjoyment of games, songs, and other entertainment.
While the foregoing disclosure shows illustrative embodiments of the invention, it should be noted that various changes and modifications can be made herein without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, the functions, steps, and/or actions of the method claims in accordance with the embodiments of the invention described herein need not be performed in any particular order. Furthermore, although elements of the invention may be described or claimed in the singular, the plural is contemplated unless limitation to the singular is explicitly stated. Likewise, functional elements that are indicated as part of a server and/or system can be organized in any operable fashion and can be integrated or separated as desired. For example, the billing server can reside on a separate server from the validation logic, or both can reside on a common server and/or be integrated into a common element.
Therefore, the above-described embodiments should be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. Accordingly, it should be appreciated that variations to those embodiments can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/538,206 filed on Jan. 21, 2004. The disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 628294 | Ira | Jul 1899 | A |
| 4156903 | Barton et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4528589 | Block et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4975942 | Zebryk | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5005122 | Griffin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5013897 | Harman et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5329619 | Page et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5564070 | Want et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5608781 | Seiderman | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5619247 | Russo | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5634012 | Stefik et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5666293 | Metz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5666397 | Lamons et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5761485 | Munyan | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5812533 | Cox et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812988 | Sandretto | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5845267 | Ronen | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5852812 | Reeder | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857201 | Wright, Jr. et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5907837 | Ferrel et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5940752 | Henrick | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5956034 | Sachs et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970490 | Morgenstern | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5986690 | Hendricks | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6014641 | Loeb et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6035281 | Crosskey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047051 | Ginzboorg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6088717 | Reed et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6141404 | Westerlage et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151606 | Mendez | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6181704 | Drottar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185198 | Ladue | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6185683 | Ginter et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6202054 | Lawlor et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6226618 | Downs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6230168 | Unger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6230269 | Spies et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253239 | Shklar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253326 | Lincke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6263326 | Chandra | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263362 | Donoho et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266401 | Marchbanks et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269157 | Coyle | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6282294 | Deo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6311223 | Bodin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6321078 | Menelli et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324565 | Holt, III | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327574 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334114 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334116 | Ganesan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6336137 | Lee et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343318 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6366893 | Hannula et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6381325 | Hanson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389464 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6427076 | Skog | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6434535 | Kupka et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6453160 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6460076 | Srinivasan | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6463534 | Geiger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6493722 | Daleen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6535726 | Johnson | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6549770 | Marran | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6597903 | Dahm et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6598026 | Ojha et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6622017 | Hoffman | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6628934 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6665711 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6683941 | Brown et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6704716 | Force | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6721716 | Gross | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6741980 | Langseth et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6742043 | Moussa et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6754320 | Daase et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757710 | Reed | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6792271 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6792280 | Hori et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6816721 | Rudisill | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6820121 | Callis et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6829593 | Ritter et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6857067 | Edelman | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6873936 | Reel et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6880750 | Pentel | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6883142 | Shimamoto et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6928441 | Haegele | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937996 | Forsythe et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6941139 | Shupe et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6941270 | Hannula | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6954793 | Ramaswamy et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6955883 | Margus et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6957793 | Gautier et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6965883 | Xu et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6978273 | Bonneau et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6985882 | Del Sesto | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6996537 | Minear et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7010500 | Aarnio | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7013289 | Horn et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020688 | Sykes, Jr. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7039389 | Johnson, Jr. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7043447 | Hughes et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047405 | Mauro | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7068680 | Kaltenmark et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7099891 | Harris et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7113766 | Horel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7117504 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7177837 | Pegaz-Paquet | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7184747 | Bogat | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7200566 | Moore et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7206842 | Nainani et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7218917 | Pradhan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228333 | Smith | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7233790 | Kjellberg et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7260194 | Meyers et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7269654 | Srinivas | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7278164 | Raiz et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7286655 | Voorman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7293099 | Kalajan | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7334025 | Kuriya | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7362745 | Cope et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7370120 | Kirsch et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7404148 | Lincke et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7415439 | Kontio et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7436816 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7444411 | Sung et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7467198 | Goodman et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7490045 | Flores et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7526450 | Hughes et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7574377 | Carapelli | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7577616 | Zhu | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7583953 | Choi et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7660755 | Amato et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7711680 | Barnes-Leon et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7752217 | Sawashima et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7894803 | Kamada | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7904528 | Zilliacus et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7907937 | Engelhart | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8028056 | Krishna et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8150736 | Horn et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8489470 | Kahlon et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 20010013020 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010019604 | Joyce et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032254 | Hawkins | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034686 | Eder | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010036271 | Javed | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037304 | Paiz | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056362 | Hanagan | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002603 | Vange | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004935 | Huotari et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020019764 | Mascarenhas | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022472 | Watler et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022971 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029197 | Kailamaki | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029200 | Dulin et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035688 | Kutaragi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035699 | Crosbie | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049717 | Routtenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052754 | Joyce et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052968 | Bonefas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062290 | Ricci | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069176 | Newman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069244 | Blair et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069263 | Sears et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020071559 | Christensen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083006 | Headings et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083050 | Liu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107706 | Oliver | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107795 | Minear | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107809 | Biddle et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020109706 | Lincke et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111904 | Gruber et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128908 | Levin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129165 | Dingsor et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131401 | Ehreth | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131404 | Mehta et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160752 | Hook et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162112 | Javed | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165822 | Makipaa | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176553 | Aschir | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020190120 | Pentel | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194143 | Banerjee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005136 | Eun | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023550 | Lee | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028903 | Hofrichter et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046396 | Richter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051047 | Horel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060188 | Gidron et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074328 | Schiff | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078844 | Takatori et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078886 | Minear | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078895 | MacKay | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083973 | Horsfall | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083991 | Kikinis | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093461 | Suzuki et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093565 | Berger et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030096591 | Pohutsky et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110044 | Nix | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110213 | Munetsugu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120594 | Shaginaw et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149958 | Baluja et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030151621 | McEvilly et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176182 | Cerami | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208444 | Sauer | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212904 | Randle et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233329 | Laraki et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236867 | Natsuno et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006517 | Takatori | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015413 | Abu-Hejleh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015562 | Harper et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030601 | Pond et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043753 | Wake et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044623 | Wake et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116119 | Lewis | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137890 | Kalke | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139012 | Koskinen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181591 | Yu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267630 | Au et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050086348 | Balassanian | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090258 | Coppinger | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113092 | Coppinger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114155 | Hodges et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125315 | Munoz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132049 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148319 | Himeno | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192878 | Minear | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289047 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060014535 | Walker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080232 | Epps | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143119 | Krueger | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173758 | Minear et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235931 | Ruthe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253350 | Falkenhain | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060270386 | Yu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271449 | Oliver et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070003034 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038703 | Tendjoukian et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066279 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083464 | Cordero Torres et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123229 | Pousti | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070169163 | Morio | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070174308 | Rausch | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070197188 | Sprigg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070197189 | Horel et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20110030042 | Neal-Joslin | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110143709 | Pousti | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20120309345 | Wake et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2267549 | Sep 2000 | CA |
| 2363220 | May 2003 | CA |
| 1147325 | Apr 1997 | CN |
| 1459183 | Nov 2003 | CN |
| 0780802 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 0895148 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 1026610 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1026853 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1033652 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1047030 | Oct 2000 | EP |
| 1102191 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1122967 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 1162807 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 1204025 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1204054 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1403797 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1404100 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1414185 | Apr 2004 | EP |
| 2775550 | Sep 1999 | FR |
| 2349548 | Nov 2000 | GB |
| 07044261 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 07319691 | Dec 1995 | JP |
| 9319573 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 1066050 | Mar 1998 | JP |
| 10140283 | May 1998 | JP |
| 10260873 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 10262059 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 11053185 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 11055252 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 11069017 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 11126188 | May 1999 | JP |
| H11203127 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 200056967 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2000078129 | Mar 2000 | JP |
| 2000505568 | May 2000 | JP |
| 2000357196 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| 2001195451 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001202434 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001243382 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2001250069 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2001265938 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2001268623 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2001312324 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2001312666 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2001319168 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2001320509 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2001325234 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2001340656 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2001352583 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002007839 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002015160 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002027151 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002091850 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002093361 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002094450 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 200299441 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002099289 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002101315 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002109395 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002132367 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002133316 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002163258 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002163467 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002175387 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002197294 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2002245350 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2002279103 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002329249 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2002335336 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2002345030 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2002353885 | Dec 2002 | JP |
| 2003016041 | Jan 2003 | JP |
| 2003016093 | Jan 2003 | JP |
| 2003518885 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2003187083 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2004004157 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004005044 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004135229 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2004185197 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004220546 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 3609398 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005078325 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2005519407 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005198021 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2006505966 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2007527570 | Sep 2007 | JP |
| 2008514743 | May 2008 | JP |
| 2010178027 | Aug 2010 | JP |
| 200072521 | Dec 2000 | KR |
| 20010078968 | Aug 2001 | KR |
| 20020039648 | May 2002 | KR |
| 2003-0042660 | Jun 2003 | KR |
| 1020030050565 | Jun 2003 | KR |
| 20030078446 | Oct 2003 | KR |
| 2165679 | Apr 2001 | RU |
| 2169437 | Jun 2001 | RU |
| 2191482 | Oct 2002 | RU |
| 2212057 | Sep 2003 | RU |
| 2232483 | Jul 2004 | RU |
| 161301 | Jun 1991 | TW |
| 388021 | Apr 2000 | TW |
| 466858 | Dec 2001 | TW |
| 499645 | Aug 2002 | TW |
| WO-9308545 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| WO-9703410 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| 9745814 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO-9726739 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO-98021676 | May 1998 | WO |
| 9952077 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO-9931610 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO-9941861 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| 9960801 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO-0002112 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| 0079451 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO-0031672 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0043962 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO-0056033 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO-0103410 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| 0118694 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO-0143390 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| 0149048 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0150305 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO-0163900 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO-01063532 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO-0169891 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO-0197104 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO-0203219 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO-0231718 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO-02044892 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO-02067600 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| 02073934 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| 02093361 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| 02103459 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 03032618 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO-03050743 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 03075584 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 03079256 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 03085943 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2004003708 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2004084526 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| 2005008383 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005004456 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005020027 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 05069917 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2006130539 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| McAuliffe W. Broadband heading for move to metered billing. New Media Age [serial online]. Apr. 29, 2004;:1. Available from: Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed Jul. 1, 2013. |
| How can wireless models help my business?. Computer Weekly [serial online]. Dec. 2, 2003;:30. Available from: Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed Jul. 1, 2013. |
| International Search Report, PCT/US05/001583, International Search Authority, European Patent Office, Nov. 21, 2006. |
| Anonymous, “BPM in Action: iUNIVERSE,” Intelligent Enterprise, San Mateo, May 15, 2004, vol. 7, Issue 8, 2 pages (recovered from ProQuest on Jun. 5, 2009). |
| Anonymous: “BREW TM Application Note: Developing BREW Applications for Devices with RUIM Units”, May 14, 2005, May 14, 2005 (May 14, 2005), pp. 1-11, XP007920607, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20050514075656/http://brew.qualcomm.com/brew_bnry/pdf/developer/resources/ds/Dev_BREW_Apps.pdf. |
| Anonymous: “Internet Archive Wayback Machine”, Internet Citation, May 14, 2005 (May 14, 2005), p. 1, XP007920684, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://wayback.archive.org/web/200506150000007*/http://brew.qualcomm.com/brew_bnry/pdf/developer/resources/ds/Dev_BREW_Apps.pdf [retrieved on Jun. 4, 2012]. |
| Arar, Yardena, “Download apps to a phone,” PC World, Jun. 2002, v20i6 pp. 64, Proquest #120993020 3 pgs. |
| Atsuyuki Morishima, “Efficient Construction of Materialized XML Views With Silkroute”, IPSJ SIG Notes, Japan, Information Processing Society of Japan, Jul. 17, 2001, vol. 2001, No. 70, pp. 421-428. |
| Business Wire, “Informix Announces Key Customer Wins in Fourth Quarter; Leading Companies and Government Entities in Key Markets Around the World Respond to Informer's Technology Strategy”, Business/Technology Editors. Business Wire. New York: Jan. 27, 1999, p. 1-8. |
| Butrico M A et al: “Gold Rush: Mobile Transaction Middleware With Java-Object Replication” Conference on Object-Oriented Technologies, (Jun. 16, 1997), pp. 91-101. |
| Classified Ad 3—No Title, New York Daily Times (1851-1857); Nov 15, 1853; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The New York Times (1851-2008) p. 4. |
| Classified Ad 74—No Title. Chicago Daily Tribune (1923-1963); Oct 11, 1959; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: Chicago Tribune (1849-1989) p. G34. |
| “Ellipsus' Mobile Aplication Provisioning System”, Internet Citation, Dec. 2, 2001 (Dec. 2, 2001), XP002266188, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: web.archive.orgfwww.ellipsus.com [retrieved on Jan. 7, 2004]. |
| EPO: “Notice From the European Patent Office dated Oct. 1, 2007 Concerning Business Methods”, Journal of the European Patent Office—Vol. 30, No. 11, Nov. 1, 2007 (Nov. 1, 2007), pp. 592-593, XP007905525, ISSN: 0170-9291. |
| European Search Report—EP12166425—Search Authority—Hague—dated Jun. 4, 2012. |
| European Search Report—EP12166426—Search Authority—Munich—dated May 22, 2012. |
| Fujii, H. “BREW application, flexibility in development comparable to PCs, powerful in enterprise system cooperation of cellular phones,” Solution IT, vol. 14, No. 11, Japan, RIC Telecom, Nov. 1, 2002, pp. 22-24. |
| Goldenberg-Hart, Diane, “A Glossary of Selected Internet and Computing Terms,” Yale University Library, Jun. 1996. Retrieved from http://www.library.yale.edu/ref/internet/intgloss.htm. |
| M2 Presswire. Convergys: Genie Mobile chooses Geneva Billing software, continuing the momentum of the merger between Convergys and Geneva Technology. Coventry: Jun. 1, 2001, p. 1. |
| No Author, “AvantGo 4.0 Powers Wireless Applications and Services”, Customer Inter@ction Solutions, May 2001, vol. 19, Issue 11, p. 71. |
| No Author, “Sony Pictures to Sell Movies via Internet,” Jul. 9, 2001, Source: Japan Computer Industry Scan. |
| Oommen P., “Over the Air Handset Management,” Emerging Technologies Symposium, Broadband, Wireless Internet Access, 2000, IEEE Apr. 10-11, 2000, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, Apr. 10, 2000 (Apr. 10, 2000), pp. 1-4, XP010538894, ISNB: 0-7803-6364-7. |
| PR Newswire. China Unicom Selects Qualcomm's BREW Solution as Its Platform to Launch Wireless Data Applications. New York, Aug. 26, 2002, p. 1. |
| PR Newswire, “Diebold Teams with Health System Services to Offer a Complete Distribution Package for Pharmacy Medication and Supplies” . New York: May 28, 1998. p. 1-3. |
| Qualcomm; “Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless, BREW Application note: Developing BREW Applications for Devices with RUIM Units” (Online) Jan. 10, 2005, pp. 1-11, XP002410586 San Diego Retrieved from the internet: URL:http://brew.qualcomm.com/brew_bnry/pdf/developer/resources/ds/Dev_BREW_Apps.pdf> [retrieved on Dec. 6, 2006]. |
| Qualcomm Incorporated, “BREW Distribution System (BDS) Overview” Internet Citation, (Online) 2003, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.wirelessknowledge.com/brew/images/about/pdf/bds.pdf> (retrieved on Dec. 6, 2006), pp. 1-17. |
| Rigdon, Joan E., “CyberSource Begins to Offer Software of Symantec and Others on the Internet,” Wall Street Journal, Jan. 31, 1995. |
| Supplementary European Search Report—EP05722457—Search Authority—The Hague—dated Nov. 12, 2009. |
| SYNCML Consortium: “SYNCML Sync Protocol, Version 1.0” (Dec. 7, 2000), Chapters 1,2,5-8. |
| SYNCML Consortium: “SYNCML Sync Protocol, Version 1.0.1” (Jun. 15, 2001). |
| Telesens: TelesensKSCL and Comptel sign strategic agreement; New alliance expands best of suite billing offering and furthers drive towards comprehensive next generation solution for network service providers M2 Presswire, Coventry, Nov. 28, 2000, p. 1. |
| USA Group Selects Click-N-Done for Electronic Bill Presentment and Payment; Software Will Support Online Presentment and Payment for Education Loan Borrowers Business Editors, Internet Writers. Business Wire. New York: Apr. 24, 2000. p. 1. |
| Written Opinion—PCT/US05/001583, International Search Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, dated Nov. 21, 2006. |
| “SYNCML Representation Protocol, Version 1.0” SYNCML Representation Protocol, (Dec. 7, 2000), pp. 1-104, Chapters 1-4. |
| Floyd R, et al., “Mobile Web Access Using Enetwork Web Express”, IEEE Personal Communications, IEEE Communications Society, US, vol. 5, No. 5, Oct. 1, 1998 (Oct. 1, 1998) , pp. 47-52, XP000786616. |
| Seifert A., et al. “A Multi-Version Cache Replacement and Prefetching Policy for Hybrid Data Delivery Environments,” Proceeding VLDB '02 Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 850-861, XP055148735. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050192878 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60538206 | Jan 2004 | US |
