Traffic congestions occur mainly through lack of consideration for the driver from the traffic authorities.
At present the existing process to diminish or avoid traffic jams by diverting the traffic to less congested roads proves to be absolutely ineffective. Main reason is the lack of alternative routes, for example at border crossings, on motorways or construction sites for repairing purposes.
Processes, influencing the speed of the vehicle (alternating signals suggesting adequate speed limits) are methods highly depending on the driver respecting them. It is a fact, that alternative routes and deviations as well as speed limit suggestions mentioned above can not be safely manipulated.
The presented application's main priority is to avoid the “stop and go” driving behaviour. Highest fuel consumption and concentrated gas emissions are the negative effects of such behaviour.
This new application takes closer consideration of travel time as well as length of traffic jam. The drivers are confronted with one single driving behaviour and one single route only.
Travelling through a congested area depends highly on the “stop and go” driving behaviour of each driver. The amount of time used by vehicles to pass a traffic jam is the key issue of this claim for patent.
The main target of the inventor is to interchange the “stop and go” driving behaviour with a “stop and wait, then go later without stopping” driving behaviour. This includes the treatment of time.
The treatment of space or area occupied for the traffic jams is based on a continues backward movement of the traffic congestion, meaning a movement towards the area of less traffic.
After the source of congestion has been located (examples are: a road work area on the motorway, which is going to be present for a number of months or a boarder crossing with seasonal congestion or maybe a well known area for accidents etc.) a sensor signal communication system is installed (
A so called congestion head is defined for each situation through the system or a video surveillance. The sensors which are installed in the forward area of the congestion head detect the expected liberation of the critical road parts (
Further sensors, located backward from the congestion head detect the gradual and later on total standstill of the vehicles and subsequently the following liberation of the critical road part.
The congested area is divided into smaller sections. The length of each section depends on the driving behaviour and the geography of the congested area. For normal traffic jams due to road works the section length is somewhere around 100 metres.
For the above example every 100 metres a signal is installed at the boundary of each section showing either a “stop” or “go” display.
Every section has sensors detecting either a standstill or flowing of traffic in the sensitive areas. They will however not detect the speed of the traffic.
The traffic jam is detected as soon as a particular area shows the “stop and go” driving behaviour. This means, a certain amount of vehicles have gone through a temporary standstill and the sensors have determined the congestion head. The congestion head is usually just preceding the actual cause of the congestion.
The first 200-300 metres of congestion are surveyed. It is also possible to survey a shorter distance of “stop and go” driving behaviour, but research has shown, that the actual duration of a traffic jam gets shorter the earlier it gets detected and measures are taken.
As soon as an actual traffic congestion has been detected, the first stop signal preceding the congestion head is activated. The sensors in between will detect a liberation of the conflict area. Meanwhile further sections one after the other get affected by the situation and the vehicles slowly stop down one by one.
The sensors inform the central computer and it will activate the next stop signal for the second section and so on.
Meanwhile the conflict area has been liberated and therefore the signal for the first section turns green and vehicles can move again. After the first section is liberated the second section gets the right to go and so on until the last section gets liberated ending the traffic congestion (
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007801 | Halvorson | Jul 1935 | A |
2219310 | Haugh, Jr. | Oct 1940 | A |
4370718 | Chasek | Jan 1983 | A |
5050161 | Golestani | Sep 1991 | A |
5999877 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6191705 | Oomen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6304816 | Berstis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317058 | Lemelson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318274 | Park | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6393360 | Ma | May 2002 | B1 |
6405132 | Breed et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6466862 | DeKock et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6489920 | Anders et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6556916 | Waite et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6574548 | DeKock et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587778 | Stallard et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6633238 | Lemelson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6668729 | Richards | Dec 2003 | B1 |
20030236612 | Ambort | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1110419 | Oct 1995 | CN |
591150 | Jan 1999 | EP |
2000097065 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000153752 | Jun 2000 | JP |
WO 9108628 | Jun 1991 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030236612 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |