Patent Grant
11108827
This disclosure relates generally to content management. More particularly, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a new solution for controlling how backend content can be deployed and managed at client devices through managed containers operating on client devices and an application gateway connected to backend systems.
Conventional content control software and services are designed to control what content delivered over the Internet may be viewed or blocked from viewing. Generally, access to such controlled content can be restricted at various levels. For instance, a firewall may be used to block access to certain websites or a timer may be set up at a user's computer to limit the amount of time that an application may be used. Additionally, filters such as e-mail filters and browser-based filters may be used.
However, such content control software and services are often inadequate to control content downloaded by users to their computers. This can be problematic for enterprises wanting to retain control over enterprise content downloaded to devices that may or may not be owned by the enterprises. Embodiments disclosed herein can address this issue and more.
An object of this disclosure is to provide an effective mechanism by which an entity can retain control over their applications and data associated therewith, even if the applications and/or data have been downloaded onto a device not owned or controlled by the entity. Another object of the disclosure is to provide a secure storage on a user device such that downloaded applications and/or data can be protected from unauthorized access. Yet another object of the disclosure is to bridge the gap between user devices and backend systems such that downloaded applications and/or data can be updated to reflect a change at the backend, for instance, a change in a data policy rule applicable to the downloaded applications and/or data.
These and other objects can be achieved through embodiments of systems, methods and computer program products disclosed herein. For example, in some embodiments, a method may comprise sending an application from an application gateway server computer to a managed container executing on a client device. Within this disclosure, a managed container refers to a special computer program that can be downloaded from a source.
The application may be hosted and/or required by a backend system such as a content server. The managed container may provide a secure shell for the application received from the application gateway server computer, store the application and data associated with the application in a managed cache, and control the managed cache in accordance with a set of rules propagated from the backend system to the managed container via the application gateway server computer. All or some of the set of rules may reside on the client device, the backend system, the application gateway server computer, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the set of rules may include at least one of: a rule controlling storage of data associated with an application received from the application gateway server computer, a rule controlling access to data associated with an application received from the application gateway server computer, or a rule controlling update of data associated with an application received from the application gateway server computer.
The downloaded application—and any data associated therewith—remains under the control of the managed container regardless of whether the client device has network connectivity (i.e., regardless of whether the client device is or is not connected to application gateway server computer).
In some embodiments, the secure shell provided by the managed container includes a secure data encryption shell that encrypts the data associated with the application to limit or prevent access to the data by the client device's own operating system and other applications residing on the client device but not received from the application gateway server computer.
In some embodiments, at least one of the set of rules propagated from the backend system may determine encryption parameters for encrypting the data stored in the managed cache. In turn, the secure data encryption shell may encrypt the data based on the encryption parameters.
In some embodiments, the encryption parameters may be shared between the managed container and the backend system, via the application gateway server computer, to enable shared secure access to the data between and among the applications received from the application gateway server computer and the one or more backend systems.
One embodiment comprises a system comprising a processor and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that stores computer instructions translatable by the processor to perform a method substantially as described herein. Another embodiment comprises a computer program product having a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that stores computer instructions translatable by a processor to perform a method substantially as described herein.
As an example, one embodiment of a system may include an application gateway server computer communicatively connected to backend systems and client devices. The backend systems as well as the client devices may operate on different platforms. The application gateway server computer may have application programming interfaces and services configured for communicating with the backend systems and managed containers operating on the client devices.
The services provided by embodiments of an application gateway server computer disclosed herein may include various types of services that may be generally categorized as core services and product services. In one embodiment, core services may refer to services necessary for building new applications. In one embodiment, product services may refer to services configured for integration of existing products. In this disclosure, these and other services are collectively referred to as “services.”
Embodiments of an application gateway server computer disclosed herein may further include a user interface configured for administration, configuration, and deployment of the applications.
In some embodiments, a managed container may be implemented as an application (program) that is native to a client device and that can be downloaded from a source on the Internet such as a website or an app store. As disclosed herein, the managed container includes a managed cache for storing content received from the application gateway server computer, including applications. Applications received from the application gateway server computer are not downloaded from a website or third-party app store. In some embodiments, applications received from the application gateway server computer are written in a markup language for structuring and presenting content on the Internet.
Numerous other embodiments are also possible.
These, and other, aspects of the disclosure will be better appreciated and understood when considered in conjunction with the following description and the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the following description, while indicating various embodiments of the disclosure and numerous specific details thereof, is given by way of illustration and not of limitation. Many substitutions, modifications, additions and/or rearrangements may be made within the scope of the disclosure without departing from the spirit thereof, and the disclosure includes all such substitutions, modifications, additions and/or rearrangements.
The drawings accompanying and forming part of this specification are included to depict certain aspects of the disclosure. It should be noted that the features illustrated in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. A more complete understanding of the disclosure and the advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numbers indicate like features and wherein:
The invention and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. Descriptions of well-known processing techniques, components and equipment are omitted so as not to unnecessarily obscure the invention in detail. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation. Various substitutions, modifications, additions and/or rearrangements within the spirit and/or scope of the underlying inventive concept will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure. Embodiments discussed herein can be implemented in suitable computer-executable instructions that may reside on a computer readable medium (e.g., a hard disk (HD)), hardware circuitry or the like, or any combination.
Embodiments disclosed herein provide a “gateway” that controls how backend content (e.g., enterprise content owned by an enterprise) is sent out of a backend system (e.g., a content server owned by the enterprise) to or downloaded by a client device. In this disclosure, this is referred to as a first layer or level of content management or server side content management layer. Embodiments also provide a second layer or level of content management at the client side. Thus, there are controls at both the server side and the client side, providing the enterprise with the ability to enforce company policy and rules on how enterprise content is managed both in and out of backend systems and at client devices.
Embodiments of an application gateway server computer disclosed herein can, on behalf of one or more backend systems connected thereto, control content distribution to managed containers operating on client devices. Within this disclosure, a managed container refers to a special computer program for reviewing, accessing, and downloading applications via an application gateway server computer. According to embodiments, a managed container can be downloaded from a source or a network site on a private or public network such as a company's intranet or the Internet. Examples of an appropriate source may include a service or an online store (which may, in some embodiments, be referred to as an “app store”).
As described herein, a managed container can control content at a client device (e.g., how a document is stored, accessed, updated, removed, etc. . . . ). For example, if a backend system (e.g., a content server, an information management system, a document repository, a business process management system, a social server, a records management (RM) system, etc.) has a policy or rule update, or a new rule on content retrieved from the backend system, the application gateway server can broadcast the update or new rule to appropriate managed containers operating on various client devices or otherwise notify the appropriate managed containers about the update or new rule (appropriate in the sense that the content, to which the update or new rule is applicable, is stored in the managed caches of such managed containers). In this way, rules can be promulgated out to appropriate client devices by the application gateway server and applied by the managed containers on those client devices to content living on the client devices without needing any help from applications associated with the content.
For example, suppose due to a policy update, access to a set of records stored in an RM system is changed to a different security level or user group. The application gateway server can determine which managed containers store a copy of the set of records (or a portion thereof) and broadcast this change to those managed containers or notify them about the change. When a managed container receives a notice (which may be sent by the application gateway server computer using a communications channel that is different from the broadcast channel, as those skilled in the art can appreciate), the managed container may initiate a connection with the application gateway server computer to retrieve the policy update. The managed containers may then apply the policy update and change the security access to the copy of the set of records (or a portion thereof) stored in their managed caches accordingly. As this example illustrates, no user is required to open up an RM application on their device in order for the policy update from the RM system at the backend to take effect on the copy of the set of records (or a portion thereof) locally stored in the managed cache on their device.
The content control mechanism described above can be implemented in various ways.
In some embodiments, a first layer of content management 110 (“level 110”) can be realized in application gateway server computer 111 configured for controlling how backend content (e.g., applications that communicate with backend systems, documents created/used by such applications, etc.) can be sent out of the backend systems to client devices. A second layer of content management 120 (“level 120”) can be realized in managed containers 121 operating on client devices 125. A third layer of content management 130 (“level 130”) may include proprietary and/or third-party content management tools used by various backend systems 131.
At level 110, as shown in
At level 120, managed container 121 operating on client device 125 may include managed cache 124 for storing various applications 122 downloaded/pulled or received/pushed from application gateway server computer 111. All the data, documents, and files associated with applications 122 may be encrypted and stored in managed cache 124. To this end, managed cache 124 can be considered a local application repository that can provide client device 125 with offline access to cached applications 122. In some embodiments, database 126 may be used by managed container 121 to keep track of content stored in managed cache 124. Managed container 121 can be installed and run on client device 125 separate and independent of any applications that it manages. These client-side components are explained further below.
In some embodiments, managed cache 124 may store the user interface components of applications 122. However, as described below with reference to
In some embodiments, the content of managed cache 124 is managed in accordance with a set of rules. The set of rules may include rules residing at one of more backend systems 131, rules residing at application gateway server computer 111, rules residing at client device 125, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the set of rules may include at least one of: a data storage rule for controlling storage of the data associated with applications 122 received from application gateway server computer 111, a data policy rule for controlling access to the data associated with applications 122 received from application gateway server computer 111, an application rule for controlling at least one of applications 122 received from application gateway server computer 111, or an update rule for controlling update of the data associated with applications 122 received from application gateway server computer 111.
In some embodiments, the set of rules may be stored on client device 125. Managed container 121 may use the stored set of rules to control and/or protect the data associated with applications 122 received from application gateway server computer 111. For example, in some embodiments, when an update to one of the rules is propagated from backend system 131 to managed container 121 via application gateway server computer 111, managed container 121 may execute, based on the updated rule, an update to the data associated with applications 122 received from application gateway server computer 111. As another example, in some embodiments, managed container 121 may use the stored application rule to control application(s) 122 received from application gateway server computer 111.
In some embodiments, at least one of the set of rules may determine encryption parameters for encrypting the content of managed cache 124. Managed container 121 may encrypt the content of managed cache 124 based on the encryption parameters. In some embodiments, the encryption parameters may be shared between managed container 121 and one or more backend systems 131, via application gateway server computer 111, to enable shared secure access to the data between and among applications 122 received from application gateway server computer 111 and one or more backend systems 131. Regardless of network connectivity of client device 125, applications 122 and the associated data stored in managed cache 124 are under control of managed container 121. In this way, unauthorized access to the data stored in managed cache 124 can be limited or prevented. Unauthorized access may include access by an operating system running on client device 125 and/or access by non-managed applications executing on client device 125 such as those downloaded onto client device 125 without going through application gateway server computer 111.
In some embodiments, users (e.g., employees of a company operating or using an application gateway server computer) do not need to or are not allowed to download (e.g., from an online app store or a website on the Internet) any application into a managed container (although they may still download and install applications on their devices as usual and such applications are outside the scope of this disclosure). Rather, an administrator may, via administrative user interface 113 (“admin UI”) load into managed containers on client devices associated with these users with select applications and/or services available on application gateway server computer 111. For example, an RM application may be needed to access an RM system, a search application may be needed to search a content repository, etc. Depending upon the role or job function of a user, one or more of these applications may be loaded into the managed container(s) on the device(s) associated with the user.
In this way, an application gateway server computer can inject new applications directly into a managed container running on a client device and remotely manage (e.g., replace, update, change, repair, remove, etc.) any of the injected applications without going through any intermediary entity such as an online app store, website, or application developer. To this end, system 100 can advantageously provide a development and integration platform for the rapid creation, administration, and distribution of applications that can be deployed and centrally managed on a variety of mobile, desktop, and web platforms. From the perspective of entities, system 100 can provide a common point of authentication where one set of credentials can provide access to various backend systems. Furthermore, system 100 can provide a secure and managed enterprise information delivery channel for client mobile and desktop platforms. From the perspective of developers, system 100 can provide a standards-based integration platform with a “write-once, run-anywhere” application development environment. Further, as explained below, system 100 can be deployed on-premises or in a cloud.
Referring to
In some embodiments, managed container 221 may be implemented as a special computer program with native managed container components 227 and managed container plugins 228 written in a programming language native to client device 225. Additionally, managed container 221 may include application framework 229 for running native components 227 and managed container plugins 228. As those skilled in the art will appreciate, application framework 229 may include an execution engine that provides a runtime environment and a set of class libraries that can be accessed at runtime. Application framework 229 may be implemented to suppose various types of client devices 225, including mobile devices, desktop computers, etc.
Managed container plugins 228 may be configured to extend the capabilities of managed container 221 to provide additional features to installed client applications. Specifically, managed container plugins 228 may include a variety of features and/or functions that leverage services 217 provided by application gateway server computer 211. Non-limiting examples of managed container plugins 228 may include a session management plugin, an optical character recognition plugin, a document management plugin, etc. To support these capabilities, native managed container components 227 may include an application cache for storing applications retrieved or received from application gateway server computer 211, a document cache for storing data associated with the applications, a user interface for providing particular user experience with managed container 221, and a hardware interface for interfacing with the hardware components of client device 225.
In some embodiments, services (e.g., services 217) provided by an application gateway server computer (e.g., application gateway server computer 211) may include one or more of the following:
Additional details of these services are provided below with reference to
In some embodiments, an application gateway server computer may further include an application administration interface (also referred to as “admin UI”) configured for administration, deployment, and configuration of applications. A diagrammatic representation of an example embodiment of an application administration interface is depicted in
In some embodiments, users may be allowed to download certain applications into managed containers. Through the application administration interface, an administrator can control which user-downloaded applications can remain in the managed container, which should be updated, and/or which should be removed. Thus, an administrator can let a particular user go directly to an app store and attempt to download certain applications. However, through the application gateway server computer operating in concert with the appropriate managed container(s) running on device(s) associated with the particular user, the administrator can still control which applications can actually be downloaded by the particular user.
An example of a method of operation according to some embodiments will now be described with reference to
As shown in
In some embodiments, an application may be coded or written in a markup language used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web on the Internet. As a non-limiting example, the markup language may conform to the fifth revision of the HyperText Markup Language (HTML 5) standard. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments are not limited to HTML 5 content and can include any HTML, XML, text, etc. content as well. In embodiments where an application is written in HTML/HTML 5, application data 520 may comprise associated HTML/HTML 5 application files.
Manifest file 510 may be a metadata file containing metadata about the particular application. One example of a manifest file is provided below:
Embodiments of client devices disclosed herein may operate on various platforms, including desktop, mobile, and web. In some embodiments, applications and components for desktop platforms are written in native binaries or HTML/HTML 5. In some embodiments, applications and components for mobile and web platforms are written in HTML/HTML 5. Accordingly, an application package such as file 500 may be implemented in various ways. For example, in some embodiments, an application package may include an icon, a metadata file, a configuration file, and at least one of a compressed file for a web platform, a compressed file for a mobile platform, or a compressed file for a desktop platform.
Referring to
Thus, embodiments of a managed container can be downloaded and installed on a client device and provides a secure runtime shell within which managed applications can be run on the client device. Specifically, the managed container can proactively retrieve or passively receive an application (in the form of an application package, as explained below) from an application gateway server computer, extract the application locally and store the application and any data associated therewith (e.g., documents, etc.) locally in a managed cache that can be remotely managed/controlled by the application gateway server computer. Since content (which, in this example, includes the application and associated data) stored in the managed cache is encrypted/protected, the operating system running on the client device cannot open or view the managed content. In some embodiments, certain rules may be stored by the managed container on the client device, allowing the managed container to enforce the rules as needed whether the client device is online (connected to the application gateway server computer) or offline (disconnected from the application gateway server computer). One example rule may be to restrict access to certain content stored in the managed cache if the managed container is unable to communicate with the application gateway server computer.
As noted above, a user may still download and install applications on their devices as usual, allowing an application to connect with a backend system directly and bypassing embodiments of an application gateway server computer disclosed herein. However, such a client-server relationship (between an application installed on a user device and a backend system running on a server machine) has many drawbacks. For example, since such an application is not under the control of a managed container, the backend system may not retain control over the application, particularly when the user device may be offline. Furthermore, since data associated with the application is not stored in a managed cache, it is not protected by the managed container and thus may be vulnerable to unauthorized access by other applications and/or the operating system running on the user device. What is more, because the application communicates with the backend system directly and not through an application gateway server computer, it may not enjoy the many services provided by the application gateway server computer, including the authentication service. Accordingly, for each application that is not handled through the application gateway server computer, the user would need to authenticate with various backend systems separately.
An example of an application gateway architecture in operation will now be described with reference to
As described above, in some embodiments, a managed container may be implemented as an application (program) that is native to a client device, that can be downloaded from a source such as a website or an app store, and that can run on a client device separate and independent of any applications that it manages. In the example of
As described above, managed container 621 can extend the capabilities of client device 625 by leveraging services 617 provided by application gateway server computer 611 at application layer 693. In some embodiments, web application archive (WAR) files may be used to package/install services 617 on application gateway server computer 611. Services 617 may vary from implementation to implementation, depending upon availability of backend systems 631. Non-limiting examples of services 617 provided by application gateway server computer 611 may include authentication service 671 for providing managed container 621 with common authentication mechanism 697 across backend systems 631 and requests for services 617 provided by application gateway server computer 611. Note that services 617 provided by application gateway server computer 611 are “reusable” and “common” to applications managed by managed container 621 in that services 617 can be leveraged by any of such applications. Once a user of client device 625 is authenticated by authentication service 671 (e.g., for an application running in managed container 621), managed container 621 has access to backend systems 631 and there is no need for the user to authenticate for other applications on client device 625 to access backend systems 631.
To authenticate, managed container 621 operating on client device 625 may first identify and authenticate itself in a connection request sent to application gateway server computer 611. In response, application gateway server computer 11 (via notification service 674) may send out a notification to managed container 621 using a notification listener or a push notification channel already established on client device 625. Push notifications and acknowledgement mechanisms are known to those skilled in the art and thus are not further described herein. Managed container 621 must be able to receive the notification from notification service 674 and respond accordingly. To be able to do so, managed container 621 must be registered with application gateway server computer 611.
In some embodiments, registration or enrollment service 672 may be provided for registering and identifying (for the purposes of tracking) a client device. Specifically, service 672 may provide common registration services to track connected client devices, track and manage client devices to enable remote wipe, block authentication for lost devices, notify a backend system on connection of a new client or device, provide a broadcast point for notification services 674, etc.
Accordingly, application gateway server computer 611 may enroll various managed containers using registration service 672 and place a certificate on an enrolled managed container. A registered/enrolled client device must report all fields required by an administrator (e.g., location, jailbreak status, device ID, etc.), implement a notification listener to receive messages from notification service 674, respond to notification messages with an acknowledgement when required (e.g., delete, remote wipe, hold, permission changes, etc.), and display and run all applications deployed from application gateway server computer 611. Jailbreak refers to removing limitations on certain highly controlled devices, such as the iPhone, manufactured by Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif., so that root access can be gained to allow download of additional applications, extensions, and themes not officially available on the devices. Registration or enrollment service 672 may be integrated with reporting service 676 or it may be implemented separately. This certificate or token, which is issued by application gateway server computer 611, is in addition to the certificate(s) or token(s) issued by backend system(s) 631 such as a content server that a managed container is attempting to connect. To authenticate, therefore, managed container 621 would need to provide two certificates, tokens, or the like in order to connect through application gateway server computer 611 to backend system 631.
In some embodiments, a device management service may be implemented in conjunction with registration service 672. The device management service may communicate with managed container 621 to enforce a set of rules independently of any application received from application gateway server computer 611. Specifically, the device management service may communicate with client device 621 to ensure that it is registered with application gateway server computer 611 and that it obeys the rules. The device management service allows specific instructions such as a remote wipe command to be sent to a specific client device (e.g., using the media access control address or MAC address of the client device). The device management service may perform acknowledgement verification (e.g., via an acknowledgement channel) to determine if instructions were indeed received and/or performed by a client device.
Registration data (including the identification and credentials) associated with each registered managed container may be stored in data store 629. Data store 629 may comprise a central database storing configuration data used by application gateway server computer 611. Data store 629 may be managed using admin UI 630. Admin UI 630 may implement an embodiment of application administration interface 300 described above with reference to
To respond to the notification and to authenticate with application gateway server computer 611, managed container 621 must send an acknowledgement or an acknowledgement with additional information (e.g., metadata that match the registration data associated with managed container 621 stored in data store 629). If managed container 621 does not acknowledge the notification, then application gateway server computer 611 will not allow managed container 621 to connect to backend system 631 using their API.
As those skilled in the art will appreciate, the above example is one of many types of notifications that may be provided by notification service 674. Indeed, using notification service 674, messages may be selectively sent from application gateway server computer 11 to appropriate managed containers operating on various client devices, to a specific application or applications contained in the managed container(s), to a particular backend system or systems, or a combination thereof. For example, notification service 674 can be used to let a managed container know that a certain application is not allowed on a particular client device and needs to be deleted from the managed container. As another example, notification service 674 can be used to send a message to a managed container indicating that files older than ten days are to be deleted but does not specify which files are older than ten days. The managed container, in response to the message, can determine which files under its management are older than ten days and delete them from its managed cache.
Once managed container 621 is authenticated, on the one hand, application gateway server computer 611 can notify the now authenticated managed container 621 about what applications should reside on the client device, what new applications are available for download, etc., in addition to managing connections to backend systems 631. On the other hand, managed container 621 can download an application (e.g., in the form of an application package or file as described above with reference to
When the icon for the application is selected or otherwise invoked from within managed container 621, the application opens up an user interface on client device 625 and makes an API call (e.g., a JSON API call) to application gateway server computer 611 (using an appropriate certificate or token issued by application gateway server computer 611) to access backend system 631 (with an appropriate certificate or token issued by backend system 631). In some cases, API calls may be handled by API proxy service 675. In some embodiments, API proxy service 675 can be configured for communicating with (e.g., making JSON and/or HTTP API calls to) any backend system that does not explicitly support application gateway 611. In some embodiments, API proxy service 675 can be configured for communicating with external systems on another domain. API proxy service 675 may maintain a list of allowed and/or disallowed third party services (e.g., in data store 629).
In some embodiments, settings service 677 may be configured for providing a storage mechanism for settings comprising application defaults, user preferences (e.g., favorite documents, color scheme, etc.), and application state information such that these settings can be persisted (e.g., in data store 629) at the server side and consistent across the client devices and/or managed applications.
In some embodiments, content (e.g., documents, video files, etc.) from backend systems 631 may be processed at application gateway server computer 611, for instance, using media conversion service 673. In some embodiments, media conversion service 673 may be configured for controlling content quality, size, format, watermarking, or a combination thereof such that the content is consumable by particular client devices and/or per specific user preferences stored in data store 629. In some embodiments, media conversion service 673 may convert various types of content. For example, media conversion service 673 may convert a word processing document to a portable document format (PDF) to prevent changes and also watermark the PDF document. As another example, media conversion service 673 may be configured to produce only low resolution images, etc.
Note that, even if a user can open an application from within a managed container, they cannot do anything unless they have the appropriate certificate or token issued by the application gateway server computer. All the API calls that come in from client devices for connections through the application gateway server computer to the backend systems are handled by the application gateway server computer.
In an offline/disconnected scenario, the application may be opened and used (assuming such use(s) is/are allowed according to admin rules propagated from the application gateway server computer). There would still be an authentication check, but it would be based on the last set of cached credentials from the last valid authentication/connection with the application gateway server computer, due to the disconnected nature.
As described above, client devices may operate on various platforms, including desktop, mobile, and web.
Specifically,
As shown in
Acting as a native shell for applications 722 downloaded to client device 725, managed container 721 has knowledge (e.g., via managed file system 723) of where contents (applications 722 and data associated therewith) are stored in managed cache 724, can display a download progress bar on client device 725 via managed container user interface 730 (which includes common UI components in the native code), and can receive notifications 725 in the background and take appropriate action accordingly. For example, if an administrator wishes to restrict access to application 722 downloaded onto client device 725, notification 725 to remove application 722 can be sent to managed container 725, as described above, and managed container 721 will respond to notification 725 and delete application 722 from managed cache 724. All related metadata and applicable cached content will be deleted as well. Correspondingly, the icon for application 722 will disappear from user interface 730 of the managed container.
In some embodiments, user interface 730 may include reusable UI components that can be leveraged by any installed applications 722. Presentation of these reusable UI components determined by managed container 721 may provide native or intuitive user experiences. Non-limiting examples of reusable UI components for user interface 730 may include a browse list with a paging capability, form input controls, a server browse function, a user profiles and lookup function, a document viewer, etc.
As described above, managed cache 724 may include an application cache and a document cache. The document cache is not limited to storing documents and may also contain other file types such as videos, photos, and so on. The application cache can be used by managed container 721 to manage applications on the client device and communicate with the application gateway server computer to access and/or update applications 722. The application cache may be configured with security 727 such that if managed container 721 is unable to communicate with the application gateway server computer, certain applications 722 stored in the application cache cannot be accessed. Another way to control access to applications 722 stored in the application cache may be done via device hardware 780. For example, managed container 721 may be configured to communicate with device hardware 780 to determine whether client device 725 has been “jail-broken” and, if so, operate to restrict access to certain applications and/or documents stored in managed cache 724.
The document cache can be used by managed container 721 to manage documents in a hierarchical manner (via managed file system 723) and control access to selected documents stored in the document cache. For example, when a user desires to open a document, an application associated with the document may call managed container 721. Managed container 721 may operate to determine, via security 727, whether the user has the proper permission to open the document and check to see if there is a version of the document already in managed cache 724. If so, managed container 721 may give that document to the application and make no calls to application gateway server computer 711. In some embodiments, managed container 721 may call application gateway server computer 711 with the appropriate certificates or tokens to connect through application gateway server computer 711 to backend system 731 to get an updated version of the document.
In some embodiments, each desktop client device may include library 850 that may act as an interface or bridge from the JavaScript side (applications 822) into the native (common) code in which a desktop managed container is implemented (“desktop managed container 821”). As explained above, applications 822 may be retrieved and/or received from application gateway server computer 811 and may not be available from commercial app stores on the Internet.
In some embodiments, desktop managed container 821 may be required for a desktop client application of a backend system running in an enterprise computing environment. Accordingly, when the desktop client application installs, it may detect whether desktop managed container 821 exists. If it does, desktop managed container 821 may be used to update and install services and components that can be used by the new desktop client application. If it does not, desktop managed container 821 may be installed first and then used to install services and components that can be used by the new desktop client application. In some embodiments, desktop client applications running in an enterprise computing environment may re-use services and components from desktop managed container 821 (e.g., via JavaScript to Native bridge 850) and wrap/create their own experiences.
In some embodiments, desktop managed container 821 may be configured to provide a plurality of features and/or functions, including configuration push, component and service updates, application distribution and configuration, cache management and policy enforcement, state synchronization with other platforms, etc. In this way, desktop managed container 821 can provide a common integration point and a common user experience focal point in the desktop computing environment. Non-limiting example features and/or functions of desktop managed container 821 may include system tray 861, local configuration 863, server notifications 865, file system overlays 867, authentication 881, file system monitor 883, file transfer 885, content cache 841, settings cache 843, state cache 845, and database 826.
System tray 861 may include a common tray icon for desktop managed container 821 that is used across all desktop client devices. System tray 861 may further include a common menu where authorized users and/or applications (including desktop client applications associated with backend systems) can place specific menu entries. Furthermore, system tray 861 may include a launch point for all the installed applications.
Local configuration 863 may include local configuration settings for desktop managed container 821 and associated users. Authorized users can extend and add additional configuration settings as needed.
Server notifications 865 may be configured to route notifications from a push notification service to appropriate application(s) (whether managed by desktop managed container 821 or not). Additionally, server notifications 865 may be configured to display the notifications.
File system overlays 867 may be configured to provide common file system services for adding icon badges to file system objects managed by desktop managed container 821.
Authentication 881 may include a single set of credentials and an URL for each desktop client device operating in the enterprise computing environment. Desktop managed container 821 may look up the URL based on a site name registered with application gateway server computer 811. Application gateway server computer 811 may register a desktop client device via a registration service similar to registration service 672 described above with reference to
File system monitor 883 may include a registered driver for applications managed via desktop managed container 821. Specifically, an API may register as a watcher and may register file system locations to watch.
File transfer 885 may be configured to perform file upload/download that supports HTTP range headers. Additionally, file transfer 885 may be configured to allow for resuming transfers via application gateway server computer 811.
Content cache 841, settings cache 843, and state cache 845 may collectively be referred to as a managed cache. Similar to database 126 described above with reference to
Embodiments disclosed here in can be implemented in various ways. For example, in some embodiments, components of an application gateway architecture described above can be deployed on premises, on premises as a virtual machine, or in a cloud computing environment (including entirely or partially hosted in the cloud). Other implementations may also be possible.
Although the invention has been described with respect to specific embodiments thereof, these embodiments are merely illustrative, and not restrictive of the invention. The description herein of illustrated embodiments of the invention, including the description in the Abstract and Summary, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed herein (and in particular, the inclusion of any particular embodiment, feature or function within the Abstract or Summary is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to such embodiment, feature or function). Rather, the description is intended to describe illustrative embodiments, features and functions in order to provide a person of ordinary skill in the art context to understand the invention without limiting the invention to any particularly described embodiment, feature or function, including any such embodiment feature or function described in the Abstract or Summary. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described herein for illustrative purposes only, various equivalent modifications are possible within the spirit and scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize and appreciate. As indicated, these modifications may be made to the invention in light of the foregoing description of illustrated embodiments of the invention and are to be included within the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, while the invention has been described herein with reference to particular embodiments thereof, a latitude of modification, various changes and substitutions are intended in the foregoing disclosures, and it will be appreciated that in some instances some features of embodiments of the invention will be employed without a corresponding use of other features without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth. Therefore, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the essential scope and spirit of the invention.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, or “a specific embodiment” or similar terminology means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment and may not necessarily be present in all embodiments. Thus, respective appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment”, “in an embodiment”, or “in a specific embodiment” or similar terminology in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics of any particular embodiment may be combined in any suitable manner with one or more other embodiments. It is to be understood that other variations and modifications of the embodiments described and illustrated herein are possible in light of the teachings herein and are to be considered as part of the spirit and scope of the invention.
In the description herein, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of components and/or methods, to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that an embodiment may be able to be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other apparatus, systems, assemblies, methods, components, materials, parts, and/or the like. In other instances, well-known structures, components, systems, materials, or operations are not specifically shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of embodiments of the invention. While the invention may be illustrated by using a particular embodiment, this is not and does not limit the invention to any particular embodiment and a person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional embodiments are readily understandable and are a part of this invention.
Embodiments discussed herein can be implemented in a computer communicatively coupled to a network (for example, the Internet), another computer, or in a standalone computer. As is known to those skilled in the art, a suitable computer can include a central processing unit (“CPU”), at least one read-only memory (“ROM”), at least one random access memory (“RAM”), at least one hard drive (“HD”), and one or more input/output (“I/O”) device(s). The I/O devices can include a keyboard, monitor, printer, electronic pointing device (for example, mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, etc.), or the like.
ROM, RAM, and HD are computer memories for storing computer-executable instructions executable by the CPU or capable of being compiled or interpreted to be executable by the CPU. Suitable computer-executable instructions may reside on a computer readable medium (e.g., ROM, RAM, and/or HD), hardware circuitry or the like, or any combination thereof. Within this disclosure, the term “computer readable medium” is not limited to ROM, RAM, and HD and can include any type of data storage medium that can be read by a processor. For example, a computer-readable medium may refer to a data cartridge, a data backup magnetic tape, a floppy diskette, a flash memory drive, an optical data storage drive, a CD-ROM, ROM, RAM, HD, or the like. The processes described herein may be implemented in suitable computer-executable instructions that may reside on a computer readable medium (for example, a disk, CD-ROM, a memory, etc.). Alternatively, the computer-executable instructions may be stored as software code components on a direct access storage device array, magnetic tape, floppy diskette, optical storage device, or other appropriate computer-readable medium or storage device.
Any suitable programming language can be used to implement the routines, methods or programs of embodiments of the invention described herein, including C, C++, Java, JavaScript, HTML, or any other programming or scripting code, etc. Other software/hardware/network architectures may be used. For example, the functions of the disclosed embodiments may be implemented on one computer or shared/distributed among two or more computers in or across a network. Communications between computers implementing embodiments can be accomplished using any electronic, optical, radio frequency signals, or other suitable methods and tools of communication in compliance with known network protocols.
Different programming techniques can be employed such as procedural or object oriented. Any particular routine can execute on a single computer processing device or multiple computer processing devices, a single computer processor or multiple computer processors. Data may be stored in a single storage medium or distributed through multiple storage mediums, and may reside in a single database or multiple databases (or other data storage techniques). Although the steps, operations, or computations may be presented in a specific order, this order may be changed in different embodiments. In some embodiments, to the extent multiple steps are shown as sequential in this specification, some combination of such steps in alternative embodiments may be performed at the same time. The sequence of operations described herein can be interrupted, suspended, or otherwise controlled by another process, such as an operating system, kernel, etc. The routines can operate in an operating system environment or as stand-alone routines. Functions, routines, methods, steps and operations described herein can be performed in hardware, software, firmware or any combination thereof.
Embodiments described herein can be implemented in the form of control logic in software or hardware or a combination of both. The control logic may be stored in an information storage medium, such as a computer-readable medium, as a plurality of instructions adapted to direct an information processing device to perform a set of steps disclosed in the various embodiments. Based on the disclosure and teachings provided herein, a person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate other ways and/or methods to implement the invention.
It is also within the spirit and scope of the invention to implement in software programming or code an of the steps, operations, methods, routines or portions thereof described herein, where such software programming or code can be stored in a computer-readable medium and can be operated on by a processor to permit a computer to perform any of the steps, operations, methods, routines or portions thereof described herein. The invention may be implemented by using software programming or code in one or more digital computers, by using application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic devices, field programmable gate arrays, optical, chemical, biological, quantum or nanoengineered systems, components and mechanisms may be used. In general, the functions of the invention can be achieved by any means as is known in the art. For example, distributed, or networked systems, components and circuits can be used. In another example, communication or transfer (or otherwise moving from one place to another) of data may be wired, wireless, or by any other means.
A “computer-readable medium” may be any medium that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, system or device. The computer readable medium can be, by way of example only but not by limitation, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, system, device, propagation medium, or computer memory. Such computer-readable medium shall be machine readable and include software programming or code that can be human readable (e.g., source code) or machine readable (e.g., object code). Examples of non-transitory computer-readable media can include random access memories, read-only memories, hard drives, data cartridges, magnetic tapes, floppy diskettes, flash memory drives, optical data storage devices, compact-disc read-only memories, and other appropriate computer memories and data storage devices. In an illustrative embodiment, some or all of the software components may reside on a single server computer or on any combination of separate server computers. As one skilled in the art can appreciate, a computer program product implementing an embodiment disclosed herein may comprise one or more non-transitory computer readable media storing computer instructions translatable by one or more processors in a computing environment.
A “processor” includes any, hardware system, mechanism or component that processes data, signals or other information. A processor can include a system with a central processing unit, multiple processing units, dedicated circuitry for achieving functionality, or other systems. Processing need not be limited to a geographic location, or have temporal limitations. For example, a processor can perform its functions in “real-time,” “offline,” in a “batch mode,” etc. Portions of processing can be performed at different times and at different locations, by different (or the same) processing systems.
It will also be appreciated that one or more of the elements depicted in the drawings/figures can also be implemented in a more separated or integrated manner, or even removed or rendered as inoperable in certain cases, as is useful in accordance with a particular application. Additionally, any signal arrows in the drawings/figures should be considered only as exemplary, and not limiting, unless otherwise specifically noted.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, product, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, product, article, or apparatus.
Furthermore, the term “or” as used herein is generally intended to mean “and/or” unless otherwise indicated. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present). As used herein, including the claims that follow, a term preceded by “a” or “an” (and “the” when antecedent basis is “a” or “an”) includes both singular and plural of such term, unless clearly indicated within the claim otherwise (i.e., that the reference “a” or “an” clearly indicates only the singular or only the plural). Also, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The scope of the present disclosure should be determined by the following claims and their legal equivalents.
This is a continuation of, and claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/491,386, filed Sep. 19, 2014, entitled “APPLICATION GATEWAY ARCHITECTURE WITH MULTI-LEVEL SECURITY POLICY AND RULE PROMULGATIONS,” which claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/880,481, filed Sep. 20, 2013, entitled “APPLICATION GATEWAY ARCHITECTURE WITH MULTI-LEVEL SECURITY POLICY AND RULE PROMULGATIONS.” This application relates to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/491,451, filed Sep. 19, 2014, issued on Jun. 6, 2017 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,674,225, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UPDATING DOWNLOADED APPLICATIONS USING MANAGED CONTAINER,” which claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/880,502, filed Sep. 20, 2013; Ser. No. 14/491,492, filed Sep. 19, 2014, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOTE WIPE,” which claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/880,526, filed Sep. 20, 2013; and Ser. No. 14/491,483, filed Sep. 19, 2014, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GEOFENCING,” which claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/880,557, filed Sep. 20, 2013. All applications listed in this paragraph are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth herein in their entireties, including all appendices attached thereto.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5517549 | Lee | May 1996 | A |
| 5604807 | Yamaguchi | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5727155 | Dawson | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5920861 | Hall | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5995756 | Herrmann | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6088747 | Cotugno | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6226788 | Schoening | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6272631 | Tomlinson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6286039 | Van Horne et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289462 | McNabb et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6298478 | Nally | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304879 | Sobeski | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6438695 | Maufer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6470450 | Langford | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6553375 | Huang | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6611844 | Saulpaugh | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6658568 | Ginter | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6886017 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 7010536 | De Angelo | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7073073 | Nonaka | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7146617 | Mukundan et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7197041 | Tyebji | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7249369 | Knouse et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7356677 | Rafizadeh | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7356679 | Le | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7457279 | Scott | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7464367 | Wain | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7464386 | Millington | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7519470 | Brasche et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7543118 | Chen et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7720975 | Erickson | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7769747 | Berg | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7818410 | Barnes | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7890591 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 8079059 | Lee | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8214747 | Yankovich | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8239918 | Cohen | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8312356 | Cousins | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8356999 | Imai | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8407265 | Scheer | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8458232 | Spertus et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8490165 | Wray | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8522130 | Gilead et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8613070 | Borzycki et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8649768 | Gaddam | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8650303 | Lang et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8666383 | Mauer | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8677132 | Liao et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8682701 | Knauth et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8682901 | Cao et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8717166 | Diem | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8725645 | Montini | May 2014 | B1 |
| 8775573 | Ebling et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8805956 | Yang et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8806041 | Lopez Suarez | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8806574 | Manjunath | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8832681 | Cantrell | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8849978 | Batson et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8938781 | Bobel | Jan 2015 | B1 |
| 9060004 | Tracy | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9069638 | Saldhana | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9092290 | Bono et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
| 9098857 | Brown | Aug 2015 | B1 |
| 9130921 | Boubez | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9131381 | Sobel | Sep 2015 | B1 |
| 9143530 | Qureshi et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9189771 | Watanabe | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9201678 | Bacher | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9225694 | Reitzen | Dec 2015 | B1 |
| 9268920 | Butler | Feb 2016 | B1 |
| 9270674 | Lang et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9286471 | Qureshi et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9304745 | Nair | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9525601 | Jang | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9654546 | Narsude | May 2017 | B1 |
| 9674225 | Beckman et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9747466 | Beckman et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9979751 | Beckman | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10078656 | Carl | Sep 2018 | B1 |
| 10116697 | Beckman et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10171501 | Beckman et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10268835 | Beckman et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10284600 | Beckman et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10474437 | Liu et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10824756 | Beckman | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 20010051515 | Rygaard | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020059144 | Meffert | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116698 | Lurie et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147611 | Greene | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156928 | Goodman | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188842 | Willeby | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030023657 | Fischer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030054810 | Chen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069923 | Peart | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110130 | Pelletier | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110272 | Du Castel et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110443 | Yankovich | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030131245 | Linderman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149653 | Penney | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177473 | Banerjee | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191800 | Challenger et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040039720 | Hodges | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122907 | Chou | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177359 | Bauch et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040194060 | Ousterhout | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199469 | Barillova et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205491 | Korala | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205748 | Iyer | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215700 | Shenfield et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050027584 | Fusari | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027887 | Zimler | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050039034 | Doyle et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050071 | Debrunner | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055578 | Wright | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050078944 | Risan et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102329 | Jiang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108516 | Balzer | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138618 | Gebhart | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160432 | Gallagher | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165639 | Ross | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182958 | Pham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188406 | Gielow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193139 | Vinson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198100 | Goring et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240558 | Gil et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240616 | Alcorn et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256834 | Millington | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060015562 | Kilian-Kehr | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030333 | Ward et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060037030 | Kovachka | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047806 | Bannach | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075472 | Sanda et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085648 | Cheston | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122987 | Angelo | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060138224 | Azami et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143133 | Medvinsky | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230402 | Newport et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234731 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235973 | McBride et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236313 | Bibr | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236367 | Wallis | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248069 | Qing et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248590 | Johnson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253548 | Vitanov | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277248 | Baxter et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277590 | Limont | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070011292 | Fritsch | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022475 | Rossi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070028291 | Brennan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038714 | Sell | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038934 | Fellman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061373 | Kilday | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061488 | Alagappan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091848 | Karia et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070120736 | MacKenzie et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156726 | Levy | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070165615 | Shin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180477 | Hutcheson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204006 | Vallis | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243880 | Gits | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250614 | Szabo | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250839 | Van Der Sanden | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070266422 | Germane | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080010372 | Khedouri et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080014929 | Padmanabhuni et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046557 | Cheng | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071820 | Mori et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098094 | Finkelstein | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098237 | Dung et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098472 | Enomoto | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109876 | Hitomi | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080160961 | Mizuma | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080163340 | Cheeniyil | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172414 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177598 | Davie | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080178278 | Grinstein | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209567 | Lockhart | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215744 | Shenfield | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080240142 | Belgaied | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270977 | Nucci | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282205 | Dykstra-Erickson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311886 | Smith | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090003600 | Chen | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090006434 | Fowler | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090007218 | Hubbard | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125595 | Maes | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138877 | Fitzgerald et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090144828 | Thomlinson | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150676 | Chen | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157882 | Kashyap | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090205036 | Slaton | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228821 | Tapper | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228963 | Pearce | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248696 | Rowles | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282399 | Kamrowski | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282403 | Poole | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287772 | Stone | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313642 | Chen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327262 | Grack et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100017461 | Kokkevis et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100043017 | Paul et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100050167 | Bibr et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100122274 | Gillies et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100144309 | Nalley et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198651 | Johnson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100202450 | Ansari | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203960 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210240 | Mahaffey et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235820 | Khouzam | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235907 | Bowman | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100269096 | Araya | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100311402 | Srinivasan | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312817 | Steakley | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325717 | Goel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004917 | Saisa | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110035742 | Shenfield | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110126192 | Frost et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110126193 | Mullin | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110141276 | Borghei | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145930 | Gnech et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167470 | Walker | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110179126 | Wetherell | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191822 | Pinsky et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213857 | Philipeit | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110218965 | Lee | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258658 | Mobasser | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276945 | Chasman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110277027 | Hayton et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110289187 | Brodin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110302239 | Grateau | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110314389 | Meredith et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120005041 | Mehta | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120084184 | Raleigh | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089668 | Berg et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120094685 | Marsico | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120099219 | Al-Azzawi | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110112 | Luna et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120117611 | Wookey | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120120879 | Ozawa | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129503 | Lindeman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129572 | Johnstone et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120131098 | Wood | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120143728 | Bhogal et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185398 | Weis et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185863 | Krstic et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185912 | Lee | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120210333 | Potter | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120212323 | Skaaksrud et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120220263 | Smith | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226767 | Luna et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120240236 | Wyatt | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258687 | Limont | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278117 | Nguyen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290686 | Anchan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120304310 | Blaisdell | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120311527 | Lee | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314864 | Ramprasad | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120317370 | Luna | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120331527 | Walters et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130007245 | Malik et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130010802 | Ansari | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130014006 | Abellera et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031159 | Xiao | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130051554 | Braness | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130054702 | Belchee et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130061289 | McFarland et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130061307 | Livne | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067449 | Sannidhanam et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130080636 | Friedman | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130081033 | Levien et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130084846 | Walker et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130086639 | Sondhi et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130091557 | Gurrapu | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130110672 | Yang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130111460 | Mohamed et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130111573 | Mani | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130111598 | Marcovecchio et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117414 | Dash | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117563 | Grabelkovsky | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124674 | Matsumoto | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130132422 | Rogish et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130132735 | Kottilingal | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130132854 | Raleigh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130152047 | Moorthi | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130159993 | Misovski | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130159996 | Lin | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130166417 | Pulkowski | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130174154 | Poore et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130183951 | Chien | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130198764 | Kacin et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130219006 | Kuo | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130219176 | Akella | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130225282 | Williams et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227291 | Ahmed | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227558 | Du et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130231093 | Toy et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130238808 | Hallem | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130239192 | Linga et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247222 | Maksim et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130252585 | Moshir et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130263212 | Faltyn | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268470 | Yablokov | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130275404 | Osetinsky | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130276068 | Alwar | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130283262 | Rehtijarvi | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130290718 | Zhuang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130290880 | Wu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130291086 | Pontillo et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130297789 | Park et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130298183 | McGrath et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130298185 | Koneru | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310159 | Froy et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130347064 | Aissi | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140006347 | Qureshi | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140007214 | Qureshi | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140007215 | Romano | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140007222 | Qureshi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140012924 | Jagernauth | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140020068 | Desai et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140025954 | Isozaki et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032647 | Nimura | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140032691 | Barton | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140033299 | McGloin | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140047556 | Davis | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140059494 | Lee et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140059642 | Deasy et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140082135 | Jung et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140089376 | Caldas et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140095724 | Yoakum et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108474 | David et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108558 | Borzycki | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108793 | Barton | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108794 | Barton | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140108799 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140109174 | Barton | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140120905 | Kim | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130174 | Celi, Jr. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140149485 | Sharma | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140164125 | Taylor | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140164774 | Nord | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140164893 | Pariente | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171075 | Teller | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140181894 | Von Bokern et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140188601 | Buset | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140188804 | Gokhale et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140189777 | Viswanathan | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140195665 | Jang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140215450 | Salisbury | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245446 | Shanmugavelayutham | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140253466 | Brewer | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140280276 | Prasanna | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140280822 | Chennimalai et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140281531 | Phegade et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282371 | Hirsch | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282829 | Dabbiere et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140282853 | Velammal | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140295821 | Qureshi | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140298420 | Barton | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140304683 | Kim, II | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140330990 | Lang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140331060 | Hayton | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140344806 | Suresh | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140359081 | Van Deventer | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140366014 | Mair | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140366080 | Gupta | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140372980 | Verma | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150006482 | Hardy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150006662 | Braness | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150026617 | Liang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039677 | Kahol et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150088934 | Beckman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150089224 | Beckman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150089577 | Beckman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150089659 | Beckman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150089673 | Beckman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150128105 | Sethi | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150193241 | Hamzata | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150244774 | Jang | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150277702 | Hardwick et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150278513 | Krasin et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150286746 | Christoph | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150288671 | Chan | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150310208 | Prabhu | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150326557 | Teramura et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150333982 | Kang et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160026366 | Luan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160028688 | Chizhov | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160092179 | Straub | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160154629 | Noens | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160188621 | Karinta | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160283507 | Walter | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20170123768 | Liu et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170201850 | Raleigh et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170249448 | Beckman et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170250853 | Evans | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170316224 | Beckman et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180018150 | Liu et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180309747 | Sweet | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20190036975 | Beckman et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190089746 | Beckman et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190228177 | Beckman et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190230130 | Beckman et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20200013492 | Ansari | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200267236 | LeFebvre | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2698066 | Jan 2011 | CA |
| 2003854 | Dec 2008 | EP |
| WO-2004107646 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2013023179 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013151454 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Daenen, Koen, Bart Theeten, David Vanderfeesten, Bart Vrancken, Eric Waegeman, Jan Moons, Mihai Dragan et al. “The personal internet.” Bell Labs Technical Journal 15, No. 1 (2010): 3-21. (Year: 2010). |
| Insley, Joseph A., Ti Leggett, and Michael E. Papka. “Using dynamic accounts to enable access to advanced resources through science gateways.” In Proceedings of the 5th Grid Computing Environments Workshop, p. 14. ACM, 2009. (Year: 2009). |
| Alpern. “PDS: A virtual execution environment for software deployment.” In Proceedings of the 1st ACM/USENIX international conference on Virtual execution environments, pp. 175-185. 2005. (Year: 2005). |
| Bruhn, Jens, and Guido Wirtz. “mKernel: A manageable Kernel for EJB-based Systems.” In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Autonomic computing and communication systems, pp. 1-10. 2007. (Year: 2007). |
| Soulard, Hervé, and Mesaac Makpangou. “A generic fragmented object structured framework for distributed storage support.” In [1992] Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Object Orientation in Operating Systems, pp. 57-65. IEEE, 1992. (Year: 1992). |
| European Search Report for European Application No. 14185781.3, dated Jan. 29, 2015, 9 pgs. |
| Citrix: “Citrix XenMobile Technology Overview: White Paper,” Citrix White papers on line, <http://www.insight.com/content/dam/insight/en_US/pdfs/citrix/xenmobile-tech-overview.pdf>, Jul. 31, 2012, 14 pgs. |
| “Citrix MDX Feature Brief,” <http://ebookbrowsee.net/citrix-mdx-feature-brief-pdf-d506183473>, Jul. 21, 2013, 11 pgs. |
| Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 14 185 781.3, dated Jan. 18, 2016, 6 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/534,623, dated Jan. 20, 2016, 19 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,386, dated Feb. 11, 2016, 33 pgs. |
| Sobesto et al., “Are Computer Focused Crimes Impacted by System Configurations”: An Empirical Study, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, 2012, pp. 191-200. |
| “Catching based on application deployed in mobile devices in mobile networks,” ip.com, IPCCOM000209387D, Aug. 2, 2011, 4 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,451, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 34 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/534,623 dated May 11, 2016, 31 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,386 dated Aug. 9, 2016, 36 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,451 dated Aug. 22, 2016, 34 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/534,623, dated Sep. 28, 2016, 44 pgs. |
| Howatson “The Power of EIM Applications,” OpenText Engineering, Nov. 2013, 31 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,492, dated Nov. 24, 2015, 21 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,483, dated Dec. 10, 2015, 32 pgs. |
| GO! Enterprise, “Your Enterprise Goes Mobile”, Apr. 11, 2012, 6 pgs., Globoplc, San Jose, CA. |
| Pestana, et al., “LocON: A Location Based Services Platform to Improve Airport Safety”, IEEEAC paper #1737, Version 2, 2011, pp. 1-10. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,492, dated May 13, 2016, 20 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,483, dated Jun. 9, 2016, 28 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,492, dated Sep. 1, 2016, 25 pgs. |
| Meily “Secure Mobile Productivity in a BYOD World: Box for Good Technology,” retrieved from https://www.box.com/blog/secure-mobile-productivity-in-a-byod-world-box-for-good-technology/, Dec. 11, 2012, 2 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,483, dated Sep. 21, 2016, 33 pgs. |
| Preiss, “User-Centered Development of a Wireless Sensor Network-Based Asset Management System for Mobile Measurement Devices”, Confernce: Smart SysTech 2012, Jun. 12-13, 2012, Germany, 7 pgs. |
| Martens, “A Declarative Approach to a User-Centric Markup Language for Location-Based Services”, Mobility 2009, Sep. 2-4, 2009, Nice France, 7 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for European Patent Application No. 14185781.3, dated Jan. 24, 2017, 53 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,386, dated Jan. 30, 2017, 43 pgs. |
| Medjahed, “Business-to-business interactions: issues and enabling technologies”, The VLDB Journal, 2003, pp. 59-85. |
| Li, “Security Considerations for Workflow Systems”, 2000, IEEE, pp. 655-668. |
| Oracle White Paper, “Securing Soa and Web Services with Oracle Enterprise Gateway”, Apr. 2011, 22 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,492, dated Feb. 6, 2017, 31 pgs. |
| Luo, “Risk Based Mobile Access Control (RiBMAC) Policy Framework”, The 2011 Military Communications Conference-Track 3—Cyber Security and Network Operations, 2011, pp. 1448-1453. |
| Lennon, “Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) with Cloud 4 Education”, Splash'12, Oct. 19-26, 2012, pp. 171-179. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,483, dated Feb. 6, 2017, 37 pgs. |
| Suri, “Dynamic Service-oriented Architectures for Tactical Edge Networks”, WEWST 2009, Nov. 9, 2009, Eindhoven, Netherlands, pp. 3-10. |
| David, “Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Synchronization but Were Afraid to Ask”, SOSP'13, Nov. 3-6, 2013, Farmington, Pennsylvania, pp. 33-48. |
| Genbrugge, “Interval Simulation: Raising the Level of Abstraction in Architectural Simulation”, IEEE, 2009, 12 pgs. |
| Kuroda, “A Study of Autonomous Data Coherency Protocol for Mobile Devices”, IEEE, 1999, pp. 250-256. |
| Prosser, “In-Depth: Container Fields”, FileMaker Community, Apr. 3, 2014, 51 pgs. |
| Leach et al., “The Architecture of an Integrated Local Network,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. SAC-1, No. 5, Nov. 1983 pp. 842-857. |
| Sherr et al., “Application Containers Without Virtual Machines,” Dept. of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 2009, pp. 39-41. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,483, dated Jun. 19, 2017, 35 pgs. |
| “Application Note—Using Tenor Behind a Firewall/NAT,” Quintum Tech Assistance Center, Eatontown, NJ, Mar. 16, 2005, 8 pgs. |
| “FortiMail Install Guide,” Version 3.0 MR2, Fortiner, Dec. 12, 2007, 108 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,386, dated Jun. 28, 2017, 43 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,492, dated Jul. 6, 2017, 31 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/595,481, dated Jul. 31, 2017, 13 pgs. |
| Whitmore, “A Method for Designing Secure Solutions,” IBM System Journal, vol. 40, No. 3, 2001, pp. 747-768. |
| Recker et al., “A Preferable Look—APL in Window-Based Environments,” 1990, ACM, pp. 312-321. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,017, dated Aug. 25, 2017, 12 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,386, dated Oct. 11, 2017, 58 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,492, dated Nov. 13, 2017, 38 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,483, dated Nov. 16, 2017, 12 pgs. |
| Carter, Fred et al, Enabling Portable Application Development for New Media Networks, Oracle Corp., IEEE, 1995, pp. 63-70. |
| Sadtler, Carla, WebSphere Application Server V6 Technical Overview, IBM Redbooks Paper, IBM Corp., 2004, 64 pgs. |
| IEEE Std PC37.1™/D5, Draft Standard for SCADA and Automation Systems, Electronic Network Control Systems Standards Working Group of the Substations Committee, IEEE, Sep. 2007, 143 pgs. |
| Tanenbaum, Andrew, et al., Report on the Seventh ACM SIGOPS European Workshop, Systems Support for Worldwide Applications, Sep. 9-11, 1996, Connemar, Ireland, pp. 5-17. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/595,481, dated Jan. 18, 2018, 35 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,017, dated Jan. 23, 2018, 8 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,386, dated Mar. 28, 2018, 13 pgs. |
| Bruhn et al., “Comprehensive Support for Management of Enterprise Applications”, IEEE, 2008, pp. 755-762. |
| Pierce et al., “Open Community Development for Science Gateways with Apache Rave”, GCE'11, Nov. 18, 2011, ACM, Seattle, WA, pp. 29-35. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,483, dated Mar. 29, 2018, 8 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,492, dated Sep. 24, 2018, 10 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,017, dated Sep. 24, 2018, 4 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,302, dated Oct. 2, 2018, 10 pgs. |
| Zhang, Xinwen, et al., “Securing Elastic Applications on Mobile Devices for Cloud Computing,” Proceedings of the first ACM Cloud Computing Security Workshop, CCSW 2009, Chicago, IL, USA, Nov. 13, 2009, 8 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,631, dated Nov. 20, 2018, 19 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,695, dated Nov. 26, 2018, 19 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/595,481, dated Nov. 30, 2018, 10 pgs. |
| Jones, Matthew B., et al., “Managing Scientific Metadata,” IEEE Internet Computing 5, No. 5, 2001, 59-68. |
| Molva, Refik et al., “Application Access Control at Network Level,” in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 94, pp. 219-228. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,492, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 12 pgs. |
| Ross, Philip E., “Top 11 technologies of the decade,” IEEE Spectrum 48, No. 1, 2011, 38 pgs. |
| Burguera, Iker, et al., “Crowdroid behavior-based malware detection system for android,” In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Smartphones and Mobile Devices, ACM, 2011, pp. 15-26. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,017, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 5 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,483, dated May 7, 2018, 8 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,695, dated Jun. 4, 2018, 19 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,631, dated Jun. 8, 2018, 16 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/595,481, dated Jul. 5, 2018, 40 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,483, dated Sep. 4, 2018, 14 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,492, dated Oct. 26, 2018, 8 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/595,481, dated Mar. 5, 2019, 9 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,017, dated Mar. 8, 2019, 6 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/371,852, dated Aug. 1, 2019, 14 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,631, dated Apr. 30, 2019, 28 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/340,695, dated May 17, 2019, 23 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,302, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 12 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,302, dated Jan. 15, 2020, 11 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/371,812, dated Aug. 27, 2019, 16 pgs. |
| Copeland, Wes et al., “A Managed Security Environment for Enterprise iPhones,” Proceedings of the 50th Annual Southeast Regional Conference, ACM, Mar. 29-31, 2012, pp. 136-141. |
| Jaramillo, David et al., “A secure extensible container for hybrid mobile applications,” 2013 Proceedings of IEEE Southeastcon, IEEE, Apr. 4-7, 2013, pp. 1-5. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,631, dated Sep. 25, 2019, 6 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,695, dated Oct. 25, 2019, 26 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/371,852, dated Nov. 12, 2019, 8 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/371,812, dated Feb. 10, 2020, 58 pgs. |
| Enterprise Systems Architecture/390, “Principles of Operation,” IBM Corporation, Poughkeepsie, NY, Jul. 2001 (SS22-7201-08, 9th Ed., Jun. 2003), 1028 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,695, dated Mar. 27, 2020, 22 pgs. |
| Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 5th ed., 2002, pp. 32, 102. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/371,852, dated Apr. 20, 2020, 8 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/149,348, dated Apr. 21, 2020, 32 pgs. |
| Swe, Thet, et al., Mobile Assistant for the Elderly (MAE), in Proceedings of the 6th International Conf. on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
| Bareth, Ulrich, et al., “GeoXmart—A marketplace for Geofence-Based Mobile Services,” 2010 34th Annual IEEE Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2010, pp. 101-106. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,392, dated May 6, 2020, 43 pgs. |
| Qureshi, Moinuddin K., et al., “Adaptive Insertion Policies for High Performance Caching,” ACM ISCA Computer Architecture News 35, No. 2, Jun. 9-13, 2007, pp. 381-391. |
| Haining, Theodore R., et al., “Management Policies for Non-Volatile Write Caches,” IEEE International Performance, Computing and Communications Conferences, (Cat. No. 99CH36305), 1999, pp. 321-328. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,695, dated Aug. 11, 2020, 24 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,302, dated Aug. 12, 2020, 13 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/149,348, dated Aug. 28, 2020, 39 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,392, dated Sep. 9, 2020, 46 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/371,852, dated Sep. 22, 2020, 6 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/340-695, dated Dec. 4, 2020, 22 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/149,348, dated Jan. 22, 2021, 46 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,392, dated Feb. 3, 2021, 52 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/149,348, dated Jun. 28, 2021, 13 pgs. |
| Squicciarini, Anna, et al., Adaptive Data Management for Self-Protecting Objects in Cloud Computing Systems, 2012 8th Int'l Conf on Network and Service Management, and 2012 Workshop on Systems Virtualization Management, IEEE, 2012, pp. 140-144. |
| Weippl Edgar, An Approach to Role-Based Access Control for Digital Content, In Proceedings Int'l Conf. on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, IEEE, 2001, pp. 290-294. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,302, dated Mar. 24, 2021, 12 pgs. |
| Gadgil, Harshawardhan, et al., “Scalable, fault-tolerant management of grid services,” 2007 IEEE International Conf. on Cluster Computing, IEEE 2007, pp. 349-356. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/340,695, dated Apr. 30, 2021, 15 pgs. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,392, dated May 27, 2021, 8 pgs. |
| Estublier, Jacky and German Vega, “Managing Multiple Applications in a Service Platform,” 2012 4th Int'l Workshop on Principles of Engineering Service-Oriented Systems (PESOS), IEEE, 2012, pp. 36-42. |
| Herpich, Markus, Leonid Batyuk, Seyit Ahmet Camtepe and Sahin Albayrak, “A trusted ecosystem for Android Applications Based on Context-Aware Access Control,” 2012 7th Int'l Conf. on Malicious and Unwanted Software, IEEE, 2012, pp. 73-78. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/195,392, dated Jul. 12, 2021, 9 pgs. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180248915 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61880481 | Sep 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14491386 | Sep 2014 | US |
| Child | 15960000 | US |
