Application specific implant system and method for use in solar cell fabrications

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8871619
  • Patent Number
    8,871,619
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 11, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 28, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Solar cells and other semiconductor devices are fabricated more efficiently and for less cost using an implanted doping fabrication system. A system for implanting a semiconductor substrate includes an ion source (such as a single-species delivery module), an accelerator to generate from the ion source an ion beam having an energy of no more than 150 kV, and a beam director to expose the substrate to the beam. In one embodiment, the ion source is single-species delivery module that includes a single-gas delivery element and a single-ion source. Alternatively, the ion source is a plasma source used to generate a plasma beam. The system is used to fabricate solar cells having lightly doped photo-receptive regions and more highly doped grid lines. This structure reduces the formation of “dead layers” and improves the contact resistance, thereby increasing the efficiency of a solar cell.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the manufacture of semiconductor devices. More specifically, this invention relates to systems for and methods of fabricating solar cells.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Semiconductor devices are manufactured using multi-purpose semiconductor fabrication tools. Because of the ever-decreasing dimensions of current semiconductor devices, these tools fabricate devices according to strict specifications. Being multi-purpose, these tools generate ions of different species for different fabrication steps, using beams that span a wide range of energies. Capable of fabricating small-geometry devices, these tools have strict scanning dimensions. They also perform mass analyses to reduce contamination and include a special module to neutralize the collected charge on a substrate. Because these tools are so complex and their requirements are so stringent, their output is relatively small, only about 200 wafers per hour.



FIG. 1 show a prior art implant system 100 for implanting substrates as one step in fabricating a semiconductor device. Multiple wafers are introduced into the system 100 through twin load locks 105. A multiple gas delivery module 110 contains multiple gases from which n-type and p-type ions (dopants) are extracted. The ions are accelerated by a pre-accelerator 120, which transmits them to a magnet 125 that performs mass analysis to reduce contamination. The ions are then transmitted to a post-accelerator 130 and then on to a charge neutralization module 135. The beam of ions is scanned across the surfaces of multiple wafers 101 using a beam scanning mechanism 140; alternatively, the wafers 101 themselves are moved relative to the beam. A Measurements and Control unit 145 then analyzes the wafers 101.


Because the system 100 must be able to implant different dopants, the operating range of the pre-accelerator 120 and the magnet 125 must be large, generally less than 10 keV to 200 keV-sufficient to implant all the dopant types. The system 100 must also be capable of satisfying the stringent requirements of advanced geometries (smaller than 65 nm). As one example, uniformity requirements of less than 0.5% require multiple beam scans, which reduces system productivity.


A second drawback is that features on the devices vary during different stages of device fabrication. These features cannot withstand the high temperatures or collected charge to which they are exposed. Furthermore, the features themselves can adversely affect the implant beam, such as when an insulating film collects charge during its formation.


With few exceptions, device fabrication requires beams with large power densities and the generation of high temperatures. These limitations in general make prior art fabrication systems complex.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first aspect, a system for implanting a semiconductor substrate includes an ion source, an accelerator to generate from the ion source a beam having an energy no more than 150 keV, and a beam director to expose the substrate to the beam. In one embodiment, the ion source includes a single-species delivery module that includes a single-gas delivery element and a single-ion source. The beam director includes a focusing element, such as electrostatic and electromagnetic optics, used to focus or shape the beam onto the substrate. In another embodiment, the ion source includes a plasma source (such as a single-ion plasma source) that generates the ions that are extracted. This other embodiment also includes an accelerator and a beam director that spreads the ions to encompass or otherwise fully cover the substrate.


In one embodiment, the single-ion plasma source has a beam slot length of between 5 and 10 cm and a width of less than 5 mm. Alternatively, the single-ion plasma source has a broader slot length, width, or both. Additionally, a magnetron generated plasma source can be used to generate a very large plasma that the substrate can be immersed within for implantation. The ion source contains an n-type dopant, such as antimony, arsenic, or phosphorous. Of course, other n-type dopants can also be used. Alternatively, the ion source contains a p-type dopant, such as boron, aluminum, gallium, indium, or BF2. Other p-type dopants can also be used.


The beam has a power density of about 5 kW per square centimeter. In one embodiment, the single-ion source is plug-compatible with the system, such as with the single-species delivery module.


In one embodiment, the beam director includes a scanning element to step the beam across the substrate in orthogonal directions.


In a second aspect, a method of fabricating a semiconductor device includes forming photo-receptive regions within a substrate, doping the photo-receptive regions to form gridlines, and coupling metal fingers to the gridlines. The photo-receptive regions are doped with a dopant at a first concentration and with the dopant at a second concentration larger than the first to form the gridlines. The gridlines extend from topmost surfaces of the photo-receptive regions down into the substrate. The photo-receptive regions are doped and the gridlines are formed using a system that includes a single-species delivery module. Metal fingers are coupled to the gridlines. Thus, the substrate has photo-receptive regions of low dopant distribution and of high dopant distribution underneath the metal fingers.


In one embodiment, the substrate is doped singly, separately from other substrates. In another embodiment, the substrate is doped in a group, with other substrates.


In one embodiment, the gridlines are formed by exposing the substrate through a mask to an ion beam containing the dopant. The mask is displaced from a surface of the substrate and has openings sized to widths of the gridlines. Alternatively, the widths are at a known deviation from the widths of the gridlines. In another embodiment, the mask is placed on a surface of the substrate and has openings adjacent to the locations where the gridlines are to be formed. In still another embodiment, the gridlines are formed by shaping or pulsing a plasma beam containing the dopant to a width of the gridlines and directing the beam onto the photo-receptive regions. In this latter embodiment, the plasma beam is stationary. In another embodiment, the ion beam is scanned across the photo-receptive regions to sequentially form the gridlines, or it is generated to form the gridlines simultaneously.


In one embodiment, the first concentration (dose) is less than 1E15 per square centimeter. The photo-receptive regions have a resistance of approximately 100 ohms per square. The gridlines have a resistance of about 10 to 30 ohms per square, are no more than 200 microns wide, and are no more than 5 millimeters apart. In one embodiment, the gridlines are about 3 millimeters apart.


The method further includes implanting a metal seed on each of the gridlines before coupling them to metal fingers, thus forming a metal silicide.


In one embodiment, the method also includes annealing the substrate, such as by using a furnace, a flash lamp, or a laser. The substrate can be annealed in a single step at low temperatures, such as between 400 and 500° C.


In a third aspect, a method of fabricating a solar cell includes doping photo-receptive regions within a substrate to a first concentration using an ion beam having an energy of no more than 150 kV, doping the photo-receptive regions to a second concentration larger than the first concentration using the ion beam to form gridlines, and coupling metal fingers to the gridlines. The gridlines extend from topmost surfaces of the photo-receptive regions down into the substrate. The substrate is 156 mm×156 mm, the photo-receptive regions are doped using a system that includes a single-species delivery module. The system has a throughput of at least 1,000 wafers per hour.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a prior art semiconductor device fabrication system.



FIG. 2 shows a semiconductor device fabrication system according to the embodiments.



FIGS. 3A and 3B show beam optics for shaping beams in accordance with the embodiments.



FIG. 4 shows a lightly doped photo-receptive region of a solar cell in accordance with one embodiment.



FIGS. 5A-C show forming gridlines by doping the photo-receptive region of FIG. 4 in accordance with different embodiments.



FIG. 6 shows using seeds to couple the gridlines to metal fingers of the solar cell of FIG. 4 in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 7 is a profile tailoring graph in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the deficiencies in profile tailoring ability for solar cells that are doped using diffusion.



FIGS. 9A and B are graphs illustrating the advantages in profile tailoring ability for solar cells that are doped using ion implantation in accordance with one embodiment.



FIG. 10 shows the steps of a process for fabricating a solar cell in accordance with one embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Systems in accordance with the invention are specifically tailored to fabricate specific semiconductor devices, such as solar cells. These systems use tolerances that are more relaxed than those required to fabricate other semiconductor devices. They fabricate devices more quickly, less expensively, and in a smaller space than do prior art systems. Such systems are capable of producing at least 1,000 solar cells per hour.


Systems are further simplified because no charge neutralization is used since wafers have no featured coverings, scanning is simplified, and mass analyses can be performed using other methods. All of these advantages result in an output higher than can be realized using traditional semiconductor fabrication systems.


Systems in accordance with the embodiments also produce more efficient solar cells, solar cells with doping profiles tailored to reduce ohmic losses and the effects of dead layers.



FIG. 2 shows a system 200 for fabricating solar cells in accordance with one embodiment. The system 200 is simpler than the prior art system of FIG. 1: It has a higher productivity, has a smaller footprint, and has plug-compatible components (which can be swapped out and replaced with other species-specific modules). The system 200 includes a single-gas delivery module 205, an ion source 210, an accelerator 215, a skewed Beam Scanning, Mass Analysis, and Beam Shaping module 220, a Measurement and Control module 225, and a single load lock 230 to handle a single solar cell 201. In another embodiment (not shown), the single-gas delivery module 205 and ion source 210 are replaced with a plasma source module, and the Beam Shaping module 220 is replaced with a spreader for spreading a plasma beam onto the solar cell 201.


The system 200 has specific capabilities. It will be appreciated that not all embodiments have these capabilities. The ion source 210 has a long slot. In alternative embodiments, the ion source 210 includes multiple ion sources for the formation of broad and narrow, or plasma beams. The ion source 210 produces beam currents up to 100 mA of all species but is dedicated to a single species at one time. The ion source 210 is also plug-compatible for each specific application: when a new application with a different ion beam source is required, the ion source 210 can be pulled out and replaced with a different one that meets requirements (e.g., different dopant) of the next application. The ion source 210 has a beam slot of less than 5 to 10 cm and a width of 1 to 2 mm. Alternatively, the ion source 210 is a plasma source and can be configured to produce a broad beam. The length can be stretched to cover one dimension of a 156 mm×156 mm substrate or both dimensions of the substrate.


In operation, the single-gas delivery module 205 and ion source 210 together generate an ion beam, which is accelerated by the accelerator 215, either in DC fashion or pulsed. In one embodiment (FIG. 3), the accelerator has extraction and focusing elements with a limited energy range, such as between 15 and 150 keV. In other embodiments, other limited energy ranges are used. Preferably, to limit the energy requirements of the system 200, the accelerator 215 does not operate above 100 keV.


Next, the resulting skewed beam is controlled using the Beam Scanning, Mass Analyzing, and Shaping module 220. The beam is further measured and controlled using the Measurement and Control module 225 before or at the same time as the beam impinges on a single wafer 201. The single wafer 201 can be stepped in front of the beam to implant dopants according to a predetermined pattern, using a single beam to cover the entire surface of the wafer 201. In one embodiment, the wafer 201 is 156 mm×156 mm, but the system 200 is capable of processing wafers of other dimensions. In alternative embodiments, a wafer is deployed before the beam on a moving platen, or one or more wafers on a tray are exposed to the beam.


Finally, the processed single wafer 201 is removed from the system 200 through the single load lock 230.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are beam shapers 300 and 350 (also referred to as “beam optics”) in accordance with two embodiments for shaping beam spots to implant dopants into a substrate 401. In one embodiment, the beam shapers 300 and 350 form part of the Beam Shaping module 220 of FIG. 2. The beam shapers 300 and 350 each comprises a magnetic or electrostatic lens. As discussed in more detail below, the shapers 300 and 350 can be used to implant selective emitters in semiconductor solar cells.


The beam shaper 300 is a “large dimension” shaper. The beam shaper 300 receives a beam 301A having a first width and shapes it to produce abeam 301B having a second width, larger than the first, of about 5 to 10 cm, up to the dimensions of the substrate and its holder. Alternatively, the second width is about 15.6 cm.


The beam shaper 350 is a “short dimension” shaper. The beam shaper 350 receives a beam 351A having a first width and shapes it to produce a beam 351B having a second width, smaller than the first, of about 200 microns. Alternatively, the second width is about 50 microns.


The beam shapers 300 and 350 are also able to eliminate unwanted impurities entrained within a beam. For example, a slight change in the scanning angle can eliminate unwanted neutral particles or species with different charge-to-mass ratios. Alternatively, the internal cladding inside of the chamber containing the beam can be made to minimize the side wall contamination, in particular when the beam is a plasma beam.


Using the beam shapers 300 and 350, the Beam Scanning, Mass Analyzing, and Shaping module 220 (FIG. 2) is able to “shape” beams to implant semiconductors of varying geometries.


Preferably, the beam spot dimension, beam currents, and scanning methods have a beam power density of 5 kW/cm2 and do not raise the average temperature of the wafer 201 (FIG. 2) more than 150° C. in its bulk. The wafer 201 is cooled using back side cooling, elastomeric methods, or electrical cooling methods.


Beam-limited pulse-shaping methods can also be used to cool a wafer. Using these methods, the temperature of a wafer is limited by sharing a beam between any other single wafers, within one or more batches of wafers, all using automated controls. Alternatively, the system can use a pulse plasma source to distribute the heat over time rather than position.


As explained above, embodiments of the invention are well suited for fabricating semiconductor solar cells. The following co-pending patent applications, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety, describe different ways of fabricating solar cells: U.S. application Ser. No. 12/482,980 , filed Jun. 11, 2009, titled “Solar Cell Fabrication Using Implantation,” by Babak Adibi and Edward S. Murrer, and having Attorney Docket No. SITI-00100; U.S. application Ser. No. 12/483,017, filed Jun. 11, 2009, titled, “Formation of Solar Cell-Selective Emitter Using Implant and Anneal Method,” by Babak Adibi and Edward S. Murrer, and having Attorney Docket No. SITI-00300; and U.S. application Ser. No. 12/482,685, filed Jun. 11, 2009, titled “Solar Cell Fabrication with Faceting and Ion Implantation,” by Babak Adibi and Edward S. Murrer, and having Attorney Docket No. SITI-00400. FIGS. 4, 5A-C and 6 illustrate using the system 200 (FIG. 2) to fabricate a solar cell in accordance with the embodiments.


Solar cells function by receiving light energy on a lightly doped photo-receptive surface that overlies a doped semiconductor substrate, producing electron-hole pairs. The electrons in these pairs form currents that travel along the layer in the substrate, on to a heavily doped selective emitter that draws them to gridlines, to metallic fingers and busbars, and ultimately to a load. These electrons then travel back to the bulk of the substrate, where they recombine with the separated holes.


Generally, the photo-receptive regions are doped in the same step and thus to the same concentration as the area under the gridlines. For such doping, the use of these diffusion methods creates a heavy excess of un-activated dopant species very near the surface of the substrate. This results in a “dead layer”: Because the photo-receptive regions need to be lightly doped but have an excess of un-activated dopants, captivated electrons are formed when light strikes the solar cell and recombine with un-paired holes before generating any current. This effect reduces the efficiency of the solar cell.


The dead layer can be reduced by better control of un-activated dopants near the surface region of the substrate. The embodiments shown in FIGS. 4 and 5A-C show how the selective emitter can be formed by doping the photo-receptive regions to a concentration larger than that in between the gridlines.



FIG. 4 is a side-cross-sectional view of a substrate 500 to be formed into a solar cell and having a lightly doped photo-receptive region 505. In this example, the substrate 500 is a p-type semiconductor substrate and the region 505 is doped with n-type ions at a first concentration. The region 505 has a resistance of about 100 ohms per square; excess dopants impede the generation and transport of the dopant charge carriers. The region 505 is typically implanted with an energy implant of less than about 50-100 keV at a concentration of less than 1E15/cm2. Some examples of n-type dopants are antimony, arsenic, and phosphorous.


In accordance with the embodiments, the substrate 500 is doped using a beam that is broadened to provide whole coverage or is scanned rapidly (element 220, FIG. 2) in the x-direction, the y-direction, or both to cover the entire substrate 500. For solar cells, non-uniformity of coverage is estimated at less than 5% (e.g., uniformity of coverage at more than 95%), thus requiring similar homogeneity in the beam spot profile. The beam shapers 300 and 350, shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, allow for high productivity implantation.



FIGS. 5A-C show alternative ways to dope the substrate 500 with an n-type dopant, at a higher concentration than the lightly doped region 505, to form the gridlines 580A-C, thus reducing the formation of a dead layer. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5A, a physical mask 515 is positioned above the photo-receptive regions 505. The mask 515 has openings shaped to the dimensions of the desired gridlines 580A; alternatively, the openings are slightly larger than the dimensions of the gridlines 580A, by a known amount. An ion beam 600 is then directed onto the mask 515 to thereby form the gridlines 580A. In alternative embodiments, the beam 600 is a plasma beam, to which the substrate 500 is exposed. This arrangement can be used in combination with beam scanning or beam shaping methods, such as described above, to maximize the beam utilization.


In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5B, a mask 550 is placed on the photo-receptive regions 505. The mask 550 can be hard or soft, and can be formed using lithography, contact printing, or screen printing. Alternatively, an already existing mask used for contact deposition can also be used. Again, an ion beam 610 is directed onto the mask to thereby implant the gridlines 580B. In alternative embodiments, a plasma beam is used instead of the ion beam 610.


In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5C, an implant beam 620 is shaped to dope the substrate 500 and thus form the gridlines 580C. This arrangement can use a series of beam lets for simultaneous exposure, using a single scanning and stepping beam spot that scribes across the substrate 500. Alternatively, a broad and narrow beam can be used to individually expose one or any number of the gridlines 580C.



FIG. 6 shows the substrate 500 after later processing steps, in which the work function and bad gap are adjusted by the formation of a metal/semiconductor region. As shown in FIG. 6, a metallic species 700 is implanted on regions below the contact fingers, on top of the gridlines 580 (any one of 580A-C), and also on a back surface of the substrate 500 (not shown). Such “seed” implants increase the contact performance to the metallic fingers (attached to the gridlines) and to the load.


Referring to FIG. 6, the doping between adjacent gridlines 580 is approximately 100 ohms per square, the doping under the gridlines 580 is less than 10-30 ohms per square, the distance X between grid lines is about 3 mm and is expected to be reduced to 1 mm, and the width Y of the metallic species (the metallic fingers) is about 200 microns and is expected to be reduced to 50 microns.


The substrate 500 can be grown single or mono-crystalline, poly-crystalline, or multi-crystalline silicon, thin-film deposited silicon, or any other materials used to form solar cells. It will be appreciated that other types of substrates and dopings can be used. As only one example, the substrate 500 can be n-type and the gridline 580A can be p-type. Examples of p-type dopants include boron and boron diflouride. Those skilled in the art will recognize many other combinations of semiconductor types, ions, doping levels, and other characteristics.



FIGS. 7, 8, 9A, and 9B are all used to illustrate how systems in accordance with the embodiments (e.g., the system 200 in FIG. 2) tailor doping profiles to reduce the formation of dead layers and ohmic losses.



FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a profile tailoring graph 800 in accordance with the principles of the present invention. The graph 800 represents the atomic profile of a solar cell with respect to dopant concentration (At./cm3) versus its dopant depth (Ang.). The total atomic profile is represented by line 810. Through the use of multiple ion implants, each having a different concentration-versus-depth profile, the dopant concentration (and thus the resistivity) of the solar cell can be precisely adjusted and controlled across predetermined depths by the user. Graph 800 shows three different implantation profiles 812, 814, and 816. The combination of these three profiles results in the total profile 810 of the solar cell.


Although each individual implantation can be limited to a Gaussian or pseudo-Gaussian distribution, the present invention combines them to effectively tailor the shape of the total atomic profile. In controlling the total atomic profile through the use of multiple independent implants, the present invention enables the user to effectively control the junction depth 840, where the implanted dopant of one type (such as n-type dopant) meets the dopant of the pre-doped background region 820 (such as p-type dopant). The user is also enabled to also control the dopant concentration 830 at or near the surface of the solar cell. The present invention allows the user to control the surface concentration 830 and the junction depth 840 independently of one another. In some embodiments, the atomic profile is tailored to have the junction depth in the range of approximately 0.01 micrometers to approximately 0.5 micrometers. In some embodiments, the atomic profile is tailored to have the surface concentration in the range of approximately 5E18 At./cm3 to approximately 4.8E21 At./cm3. However, it is contemplated that the atomic profile can be tailored to have different junction depths and surface concentrations.


In the prior art, the adjustment of the atomic profile is limited. FIG. 8 is a graph 900 illustrating the deficiencies in profile tailoring ability for solar cells that are doped using diffusion. Here, line 910 represents an atomic profile for a solar cell. The use of diffusion to dope the semiconducting wafer prevents the user from being able to independently control the surface concentration and the junction depth. The user is limited to either making the profile 910 deeper by simply increasing the concentration and depth together to line 910′ or making the profile 910 shallower by decreasing the concentration and depth together to line 910″. The user is not able to change the shape of the atomic profile and affect one aspect of the atomic profile more than the other.



FIGS. 9A-B are graphs illustrating the advantages in profile tailoring ability for solar cells that are doped using ion implantation in accordance with the principles of the present invention. In graph 1000 of FIG. 9A, the atomic profile 1010 in terms of concentration-versus-depth is illustrated for a solar cell formed using prior art methods. Here, the profile 1010 is limited to a simple Gaussian distribution, making it difficult for the electrons generated in the electron-hole pair generating region to travel up to the contacts. The steep slope of the profile 1010 reflects the significant increase in dopant concentration (and thus resistivity) as the electrons travel towards conductive contacts at the surface of the wafer. This steep slope can make it more difficult for the electrons to reach the contacts, thus resulting in an undesirable loss of electricity.


In graph 1000′ of FIG. 9B, the atomic profile 1010′ in terms of concentration-versus-depth is illustrated for a solar cell formed using the multiple ion implants of the present invention. The profile 1010′ can be shaped to form a more gradual (less steep) increase in concentration as the electrons travel towards the contacts at the surface of the semiconducting wafer. This tailoring of the atomic profile is made possible by the use of multiple ion implants to independently control the junction depth and the surface concentration, as well as everything in between.


In FIG. 7, the different implantations 812, 814, and 816 can determine different aspects of the solar cell. For example, in some embodiments, line 812 (the mid-range implant) determines the homogeneous emitter, while lines 814 and 816 are added as a series of selective implants to provide the selective emitter region. These implantation steps can be performed either on blanket substrates, without any covering, or through any anti-reflective covering (e.g., nitride, oxide or any other films), as well as on surface texturing that is required for solar cell fabrications. In the case of texturing, ion implantation provides a good adherence to the surface contour, and thus improves the contact formation. Texturing is described in U.S. provisional application No. 61/133,028, which is incorporated by reference above. Graph 800 of FIG. 7 shows surface coating 850, such as the anti-reflective coating previously discussed. This coating can be any thickness.



FIG. 10 is a flow chart showing the steps of a process 1100 for fabricating a solar cell in accordance with the embodiments. Referring to FIGS. 2 and 10, the process starts in the step 1101 in which, for example, a specific ion source 210 required to fit the processing application is plugged into the system 200. In the step 1103, a single wafer is placed into the load lock 230. In the step 1105, the wafer is processed by doping photo-receptive regions at one concentration and at a higher concentration to form the gridlines. This step can include multiple doping cycles.


Next, in the step 1107, contact seeds, printed or inkjet printed metallic fingers, busbars and other contacts are formed. In the step 1109, the wafer is fired to establish the contacts and activate and anneal the substrate dopings. The wafer can be annealed using a furnace, flash lamp or laser, to name only a few devices, at temperatures between 400 and 500 degrees centigrade, temperatures lower than those required using prior art systems. Preferably, only a single annealing step is required. The wafer can also be annealed at different temperatures for a time that brings about comparable results.


In the step 1111, the wafer is measured for performance and then sorted. The process ends in the step 113.


Preferably, the steps 1100 are performed by a controller using (1) computer-executable instructions stored on a computer-readable medium and (2) a processor that executes the instructions. Referring to FIG. 2, in one embodiment this controller (not shown) is operatively coupled to the Beam Scanning, Mass Analysis and Beam Shaping module 220, the Measurement and Control module 225, or both.


Though the embodiments describe solar cells, it will be appreciated that other semiconductor devices can be fabricated in accordance with the embodiments.


It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that other modifications may be made to the embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of fabricating a semiconductor device comprising: doping photo-receptive regions within a substrate to a first concentration;doping the photo-receptive regions to a second concentration larger than the first concentration to form gridlines, wherein the gridlines extend from topmost surfaces of the photo-receptive regions down into the substrate; andcoupling metal fingers to the gridlines,wherein the photo-receptive regions and the gridlines are doped using a systemcomprising a single-species delivery module; and,further comprising implanting a seed on each of the gridlines before coupling the gridlines to metallic fingers.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the substrate is doped separately from other substrates.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein forming the gridlines comprises exposing the substrate through a mask displaced from a surface of the substrate to an ion beam containing a dopant, wherein the mask has openings sized to widths of the gridlines.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein forming the gridlines comprises exposing the substrate through a mask coupled to a surface of the substrate to an ion beam containing a dopant, wherein the mask has openings adjacent to where the gridlines are to be formed.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein forming the gridlines comprises shaping a beam containing dopants to a width of the gridlines and directing the beam onto the photo-receptive regions.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein directing the beam comprises scanning the beam across the photo-receptive regions to sequentially form the gridlines.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein directing the beam comprises generating the beam to simultaneously form the gridlines.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the first concentration is less than 1E15 per square centimeter.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the photo-receptive regions have a resistance of at least 100 ohms per square.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the gridlines have a resistance of about 10 to 30 ohms per square.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the gridlines are no more than 200 microns wide.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the gridlines are no more than 5 millimeters apart.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising annealing the substrate at between 400 and 500 degrees Centigrade.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming a contact on a back surface of the substrate.
  • 15. A method of fabricating a solar cell comprising: doping photo-receptive regions within a substrate to a first concentration using an ion beam having an energy of no more than 150 kV;doping the photo-receptive regions to a second concentration larger than the first concentration using the ion beam to form gridlines, wherein the gridlines extend from topmost surfaces of the photo-receptive regions down into the substrate; andcoupling metal fingers to the gridlines,wherein the substrate is 156 mm×156 mm, the photo-receptive regions are doped using a system comprising a single-species delivery module, and a throughput of the system is at least 1,000 wafers per hour; and,further comprising implanting a seed on each of the gridlines before coupling the gridlines to metallic fingers.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to the co-pending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/131,687, filed Jun. 11, 2008, entitled “SOLAR CELL FABRICATION USING IMPLANTATION,” co-pending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/131,688, filed Jun. 11, 2008, entitled “APPLICATIONS SPECIFIC IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR USE IN SOLAR CELL FABRICATIONS,” co-pending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/131,698, filed Jun. 11, 2008, entitled “FORMATION OF SOLAR CELL- SELECTIVE EMITTER USING IMPLANTATION AND ANNEAL METHODS,” and co-pending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/133,028, filed Jun. 24, 2008, entitled “SOLAR CELL FABRICATION WITH FACETING AND IMPLANTATION,” co-pending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/210,545, filed Mar. 20, 2009, entitled “ADVANCED HIGH EFFICIENCY CRYSTALLINE SOLAR CELL FABRICATIONS METHOD,” which are all hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth herein.

US Referenced Citations (317)
Number Name Date Kind
3607450 Kiewit Sep 1971 A
3786359 King Jan 1974 A
3790412 Moline Feb 1974 A
3948682 Bordina et al. Apr 1976 A
3969163 Wakefield Jul 1976 A
3969746 Kendall et al. Jul 1976 A
3976508 Mlavsky Aug 1976 A
4001864 Gibbons Jan 1977 A
4004949 Lesk Jan 1977 A
4021276 Cho et al. May 1977 A
4029518 Matsutani et al. Jun 1977 A
4056404 Garone et al. Nov 1977 A
4070205 Rahilly Jan 1978 A
4070689 Coleman et al. Jan 1978 A
4072541 Meulenberg, Jr. et al. Feb 1978 A
4086102 King Apr 1978 A
4090213 Maserjian et al. May 1978 A
4095329 Ravi Jun 1978 A
4116717 Rahilly Sep 1978 A
RE29833 Mlavsky Nov 1978 E
4131486 Brandhorst, Jr. Dec 1978 A
4131488 Lesk et al. Dec 1978 A
4141756 Chiang et al. Feb 1979 A
4144094 Coleman et al. Mar 1979 A
4152536 Ravi May 1979 A
4152824 Gonsiorawski May 1979 A
4179311 Athanas Dec 1979 A
4219830 Gibbons Aug 1980 A
4227941 Bozler et al. Oct 1980 A
4253881 Hezel Mar 1981 A
4273950 Chitre Jun 1981 A
4295002 Chappell et al. Oct 1981 A
4301592 Lin Nov 1981 A
4322571 Stanbery Mar 1982 A
4353160 Armini et al. Oct 1982 A
RE31151 King Feb 1983 E
4377722 Wested Mar 1983 A
4379944 Borden et al. Apr 1983 A
4404422 Green et al. Sep 1983 A
4421577 Spicer Dec 1983 A
4428783 Gessert Jan 1984 A
4448865 Bohlen et al. May 1984 A
4449286 Dahlberg May 1984 A
4456489 Wu Jun 1984 A
4479027 Todorof Oct 1984 A
4490573 Gibbons Dec 1984 A
4495375 Rickus et al. Jan 1985 A
4522657 Rohatgi et al. Jun 1985 A
4524237 Ross et al. Jun 1985 A
4533831 Itoh et al. Aug 1985 A
4539431 Moddel et al. Sep 1985 A
4540843 Gochermann et al. Sep 1985 A
4542256 Wiedeman Sep 1985 A
4581620 Yamazaki et al. Apr 1986 A
4587430 Adler May 1986 A
4589191 Green et al. May 1986 A
4633138 Tokiguchi et al. Dec 1986 A
4665277 Sah et al. May 1987 A
4667060 Spitzer May 1987 A
4676845 Spitzer Jun 1987 A
4681983 Markvart et al. Jul 1987 A
4719355 Meyers et al. Jan 1988 A
4758525 Kida et al. Jul 1988 A
4828628 Hezel et al. May 1989 A
4830678 Todorof et al. May 1989 A
4834805 Erbert May 1989 A
4886555 Hackstein et al. Dec 1989 A
4900369 Hezel et al. Feb 1990 A
5009720 Hokuyo et al. Apr 1991 A
5112409 Warfield et al. May 1992 A
5125983 Cummings Jun 1992 A
5132544 Glavish Jul 1992 A
5290367 Hayashi et al. Mar 1994 A
5306647 Lehmann et al. Apr 1994 A
5330584 Saga et al. Jul 1994 A
5356488 Hezel Oct 1994 A
5374456 Matossian et al. Dec 1994 A
5421889 Pollack et al. Jun 1995 A
5516725 Chang et al. May 1996 A
5554854 Blake Sep 1996 A
5583368 Kenney Dec 1996 A
H1637 Offord et al. Mar 1997 H
5641362 Meier Jun 1997 A
5693376 Fetherston et al. Dec 1997 A
5760405 King et al. Jun 1998 A
5831321 Nagayama Nov 1998 A
5883391 Adibi et al. Mar 1999 A
5885896 Thakur et al. Mar 1999 A
5907158 Nasser-Ghodsi et al. May 1999 A
5932882 England et al. Aug 1999 A
5935345 Kuznicki Aug 1999 A
5945012 Chan Aug 1999 A
5963801 Aronowitz et al. Oct 1999 A
5985742 Henley et al. Nov 1999 A
5988103 Fetherston et al. Nov 1999 A
5994207 Henley et al. Nov 1999 A
5998282 Lukaszek Dec 1999 A
6006253 Kumar et al. Dec 1999 A
6010579 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6013563 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6016036 Brailove Jan 2000 A
6033974 Henley et al. Mar 2000 A
6034321 Jenkins Mar 2000 A
6048411 Henley et al. Apr 2000 A
6051073 Chu et al. Apr 2000 A
6060718 Brailove et al. May 2000 A
6083324 Henley et al. Jul 2000 A
6084175 Perry et al. Jul 2000 A
6091021 Ruby et al. Jul 2000 A
6093625 Wagner et al. Jul 2000 A
6103599 Henley et al. Aug 2000 A
6113735 Chu et al. Sep 2000 A
6120660 Chu et al. Sep 2000 A
6130380 Nakamura Oct 2000 A
6138606 Ling Oct 2000 A
6146979 Henley et al. Nov 2000 A
6150708 Gardner et al. Nov 2000 A
6153524 Henley et al. Nov 2000 A
6155909 Henley et al. Dec 2000 A
6159824 Henley et al. Dec 2000 A
6159825 Henley et al. Dec 2000 A
6162705 Henley et al. Dec 2000 A
6171965 Kang et al. Jan 2001 B1
6180496 Farrens et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184111 Henley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6186091 Chu et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200883 Taylor et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204151 Malik et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207005 Henley et al. Mar 2001 B1
6213050 Liu et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217724 Chu et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221740 Bryan et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221774 Malik Apr 2001 B1
6228176 Chu et al. May 2001 B1
6245161 Henley et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248649 Henley et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263941 Bryan et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265328 Henley et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269765 Chu et al. Aug 2001 B1
6271566 Tsuchiaki Aug 2001 B1
6274459 Chan Aug 2001 B1
6281428 Chiu et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287941 Kang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290804 Henley et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291313 Henley et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291314 Henley et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291326 Henley et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294434 Tseng Sep 2001 B1
6300227 Liu et al. Oct 2001 B1
6321134 Henley et al. Nov 2001 B1
6335534 Suguro et al. Jan 2002 B1
6338313 Chan Jan 2002 B1
6365492 Suguro et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383876 Son et al. May 2002 B1
6391740 Cheung et al. May 2002 B1
6417515 Barrett et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429037 Wenham et al. Aug 2002 B1
6448152 Henley et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458723 Henley et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468884 Miyake et al. Oct 2002 B2
6476313 Kawano Nov 2002 B2
6486478 Libby et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489241 Thilderkvist et al. Dec 2002 B1
6495010 Sferlazzo Dec 2002 B2
6500732 Henley et al. Dec 2002 B1
6507689 Tirloni et al. Jan 2003 B2
6534381 Cheung et al. Mar 2003 B2
6544862 Bryan Apr 2003 B1
6552259 Hosomi et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552414 Horzel et al. Apr 2003 B1
6594579 Lowrey et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604033 Banet et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611740 Lowrey et al. Aug 2003 B2
6613974 Husher Sep 2003 B2
6632324 Chan Oct 2003 B2
6636790 Lightner et al. Oct 2003 B1
6660928 Patton et al. Dec 2003 B1
6732031 Lightner et al. May 2004 B1
6780759 Farrens et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787693 Lizotte Sep 2004 B2
6874515 Ishihara et al. Apr 2005 B2
6949895 DiVergilio et al. Sep 2005 B2
7011733 Sandhu Mar 2006 B2
7022984 Rathmell et al. Apr 2006 B1
7078317 Henley Jul 2006 B2
7081186 Ehiasarian et al. Jul 2006 B2
7094666 Henley et al. Aug 2006 B2
7098394 Armer et al. Aug 2006 B2
7147709 Ong et al. Dec 2006 B1
7166520 Henley Jan 2007 B1
7174243 Lightner et al. Feb 2007 B1
7225047 Al-Bayati et al. May 2007 B2
7225065 Hunt et al. May 2007 B1
7228211 Lowrey et al. Jun 2007 B1
7250323 Gadeken et al. Jul 2007 B2
7339110 Mulligan et al. Mar 2008 B1
7354815 Henley Apr 2008 B2
7390724 Henley et al. Jun 2008 B2
7399680 Henley Jul 2008 B2
7427554 Henley et al. Sep 2008 B2
7447574 Washicko et al. Nov 2008 B1
7477968 Lowrey et al. Jan 2009 B1
7479441 Kirk et al. Jan 2009 B2
7480551 Lowrey et al. Jan 2009 B1
7498245 Aspar et al. Mar 2009 B2
7521699 Yamazaki et al. Apr 2009 B2
7523159 Williams et al. Apr 2009 B1
7532962 Lowrey et al. May 2009 B1
7532963 Lowrey et al. May 2009 B1
7547609 Henley Jun 2009 B2
7598153 Henley et al. Oct 2009 B2
7674687 Henley Mar 2010 B2
7727866 Bateman et al. Jun 2010 B2
7759220 Henley Jul 2010 B2
7767561 Hanawa et al. Aug 2010 B2
7772088 Henley et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776727 Borden Aug 2010 B2
7796849 Adibi et al. Sep 2010 B2
7867409 Brcka Jan 2011 B2
20010002584 Liu et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010017109 Liu et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010020485 Ford et al. Sep 2001 A1
20020090758 Henley et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020109233 Farrar Aug 2002 A1
20020109824 Yamaguchi et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020139666 Hsueh et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020144725 Jordan et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020185700 Coffa et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030015700 Eisenbeiser et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030106643 Tabuchi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030137050 Chambers et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040025932 Husher Feb 2004 A1
20040067644 Malik et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040112426 Hagino Jun 2004 A1
20040187916 Hezel Sep 2004 A1
20040198028 Tanaka et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050045835 DiVergilio et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050150597 Henley et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050181584 Foad et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050247668 Malik et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060019039 Hanawa et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060148241 Brody et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060157733 Lucovsky et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060166394 Kukulka et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060211219 Henley et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060234484 Lanzerotti et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060279970 Kernahan Dec 2006 A1
20070012503 Iida Jan 2007 A1
20070029043 Henley Feb 2007 A1
20070032044 Henley Feb 2007 A1
20070035847 Li et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070081138 Kerkhof et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070084505 Zaidi Apr 2007 A1
20070087574 Gupta et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070134840 Gadeken et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070148336 Bachrach et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070169806 Fork et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070209707 Weltman Sep 2007 A1
20070217020 Li et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070235074 Henley et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070277875 Gadkaree et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070281172 Couillard et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080001139 Augusto Jan 2008 A1
20080038908 Henley Feb 2008 A1
20080044964 Kamath et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080078444 Atanackovic Apr 2008 A1
20080092944 Rubin Apr 2008 A1
20080092947 Lopatin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080121275 Ito et al. May 2008 A1
20080121276 Lopatin et al. May 2008 A1
20080128019 Lopatin et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080128641 Henley et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080164819 Hwang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080179547 Henley Jul 2008 A1
20080188011 Henley Aug 2008 A1
20080190886 Choi et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080206962 Henley et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080242065 Brcka Oct 2008 A1
20080296261 Zhao et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090081860 Zhou et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090124064 England et al. May 2009 A1
20090124065 England et al. May 2009 A1
20090142875 Borden et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090152162 Tian et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090162970 Yang Jun 2009 A1
20090206275 Henley et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090227061 Bateman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090227062 Sullivan et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090227094 Bateman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090227095 Bateman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090227097 Bateman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090289197 Slocum et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090308439 Adibi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090308440 Adibi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090308450 Adibi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090317937 Gupta et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100041176 Sullivan et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055874 Henley Mar 2010 A1
20100059362 Anella Mar 2010 A1
20100110239 Ramappa et al. May 2010 A1
20100124799 Blake et al. May 2010 A1
20100167511 Leung et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100178723 Henley Jul 2010 A1
20100180945 Henley et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100184243 Low et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100184248 Hilali et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100197125 Low et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100229928 Zuniga et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100240169 Petti et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100240183 Narazaki Sep 2010 A1
20100323508 Adibi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110162703 Adibi et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110192993 Chun et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110309050 Iori et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120122273 Chun et al. May 2012 A1
20120125259 Adibi et al. May 2012 A1
20120129325 Adibi et al. May 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
1198597 Nov 1998 CN
1638015 Jul 2005 CN
4217428 Jun 1993 DE
19820152 Nov 1999 DE
63-143876 Jun 1988 JP
7-135329 May 1995 JP
100759084 Sep 2007 KR
WO2009033134 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009033134 Mar 2009 WO
WO2009064867 May 2009 WO
WO2009064867 May 2009 WO
WO2009064872 May 2009 WO
WO2009064872 May 2009 WO
WO2009064875 May 2009 WO
WO2009085948 Jul 2009 WO
WO2009085948 Jul 2009 WO
WO2009111665 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111665 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111666 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111666 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111667 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111667 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111668 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111668 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111668 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111669 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009111669 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009155498 Dec 2009 WO
WO2010030645 Mar 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (72)
Entry
Anders, “Plasma and Ion Sources in Large Area Coating: A Review”, www.sciencedirect.com, Surface Coatings & Technology, Nov. 21, 2005, vol. 200, Issues: 5-6, pp. 1893-1906, Berkeley CA.
Cornet et al., “A New Algorithm for Charge Deposition Multiple-Grid for PIC Simulations in r-z Cylindrical Coordinates”, www.sciencedirect.com, Jounal of Computational Physics, Jul. 1, 2007 vol. 225, Issue 1, pp. 808-828, Sydney, Australia.
Douglas et al., “A Study of the Factors Which Control the Efficiency of Ion-Implanted Silicon Solar Cells”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-27, No. 4, Apr. 1980, pp. 792-802.
Fu et al., “Enhancement of Implantation Energy Using a Conducting Grid in Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation of Dielectric/Polymeric Materials”, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 74, No. 8, Aug. 2003, pp. 3697-3700.
Goeckner et al., “Plasma Doping for Shallow Junctions”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, vol. 17, Issue: 5, Sep. 1999, pp. 2290-2293.
Jacques et al., “Plasma-Based Ion Implantation and Deposition: A Review of Physics, Technology, and Applications”, http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/84k974r2, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, May 16, 2005, pp. 1-69.
Jager-Hezel, “Developments for Large-Scale Production of High-Efficiency Silicon Solar Cells,” Advances in Solid State Physics, vol. 34, Jan. 1994, pp. 97-113, <http://www.springerlink.com/content/982620t34312416v/>.
Kwok et al., “One-Step, Non-Contact Pattern Transfer by Direct-Current Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation”, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, IOP Publishing, vol. 42, No. 19, Sep. 2009, pp. 1-6.
Kwok et al., “One-Step Non-Contact Pattern Transferring by Plasma Based Ion Implantation”, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, IOP Publishing, vol. 41, No. 22, Oct. 2008, pp. 1-6.
Minnucci et al., “Tailored Emitter, Low-Resistivity, Ion-Implanted Silicon Solar Cells”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-27, No. 4, Apr. 1980, pp. 802-806.
Nielsen, “Ion Implanted Polycrystalline Silicon Solar Cells”, Physica Scripta, vol. 24, No. 2, Aug. 1, 1981, pp. 390-391.
Sopian et al., “Plasma Implantation for Emitter and Localized back Surface Field (BSF) Formation in Silicon Cells”, European Journal of Scientific Research, http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr.htm, ISSN 1450-216X, vol. 24, No. 3, Jan. 2008, pp. 365-372.
Tang et al., “Current Control for Magnetized Plasma in Direct-Current Plasma-Immersion Ion Implantation”, American Institute of Physics, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82, No. 13, Mar. 31, 2003, pp. 2014-2016.
Xu et al., “Etching of Nanopatterns in Silicon Using Nanopantography”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, Jan. 9, 2008, pp. 1-3.
Xu et al., “Nanopantogrpaphy: A New Method for Massively Parallel Nanopatterning Over Large Areas”, Nano Letters, vol. 5, No. 12, Jan. 2005, pp. 2563-2568.
Yankov et al., “Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation for Silicon Processing”, Annalen der Physik, vol. 10, Issue: 4, Feb. 2001, pp. 279-298.
Young et al., “High-Efficiency Si Solar Cells by Beam Processing”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 43, Issue: 7, Oct. 1, 1983, pp. 666-668.
Zeng et al., “Steady-State, Direct-Current (DC) Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation (PIII) for Planar Samples”, IEEE, Jan. 2000, pp. 515-519.
Zeng et al., “Steady-State Direct-Current Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Using an Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Source”, Thin Solid Films, www.elsevier.com/locate/tsf, vol. 390, Issues: 1-2, Jun. 30, 2001, pp. 145-148.
Com-Nougue et al., “CW CO2 Laser Annealing Associated with Ion Implantation for Production of Silicon Solar Cell Junctions”, Jan. 1982, IEEE, p. #770.
Armini et al., “Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B6”, Jan. 1985, Vol. 94-99, 1 Page, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Spire Corporation, Patriots Park, Bedford, Masachusetts 01730, USA.
In the Unites States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Appl. No. 61/033,873, filed Mar. 5, 2008, Entitled: “Use of Chained Implants in Solar Cells”, First Named Inventor: Nicholas Bateman et al., Company: Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc., Gloucester, Massachusetts.
In the Unites States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Appl. No. 61/095,010, filed Sep. 8, 2008, Entitled: “Use of Dopants With Different Diffusivities for Solar Cell Manufacture”, First Named Inventor: Nicholas Bateman et al., Company: Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc., Gloucester, Massachusetts.
Donnelly et al., “Nanopantography: A Method for Parallel Writing of Etched and Deposited Nanopatterns”, Oct. 2009, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 36 pages.
Examination Report in 048635-108068 dated Jul. 26, 2012 (Singapore Application No. 201009185-8).
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due in 048635-108000 dated Sep. 6, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/482,685).
“Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority, or The Declaration,” Date of mailing: Apr. 6, 2011, International Application No. PCT/US11/24244, International Filing Date: Feb. 9, 2011, Authorized Officer: Blaine R. Copenheaver, pp. 1-9.
“Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority, or The Declaration,” Date of mailing: May 25, 2010, International Application No. PCT/US10/28058, International Filing Date, Mar. 19, 2010, Authorized Officer: Lee W. Young, pp. 1-9.
“Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority or The Declaration,” Date of mailing: Oct. 7, 2010, International Application No. PCT/US10/039690, International Filing Date. Jun. 23, 2010, Authorized Officer: Blaine R. Copenheaver, pp. 1-12.
“Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority, or The Declaration,” Date of mailing: Oct. 2, 2009, International Application No. PCT/US09/47094, International Filing Date: Jun. 11, 2009, Authorized Officer Blaine R. Copenheaver, pp. 1-15.
“Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority, or The Declaration,” Date of mailing: Aug. 4, 2009, International Application No. PCT/US09/47102, International Filing Date: Jun. 11, 2009, Authorized Officer: Lee W. Young, pp. 1-11.
“Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority, or The Declaration,” Date of mailing: Jul. 29, 2009, International Application No. PCT/US09/47109, International Filing Date: Jun. 11, 2009, Authorized Officer: Lee W. Young, pp. 1-11.
“Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority, or The Declaration,” Date of mailing: Jul. 31, 2009, International Application No. PCT/US09/47090, International Filing Date: Jun. 11, 2009, Authorized Officer: Lee W. Yours, pp. 1-10.
“Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority, or The Declaration,” Date of mailing: Mar. 29, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US11/61274, International Filing Date: Nov. 17, 2011, Authorized Officer: Lee W. Young, pp. 1-9.
Office Action (Non-Final) dated Feb. 28, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/482,685).
Office Action (Non-Final) dated Mar. 15, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,053).
Office Action (Final) dated Jun. 6, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/482,685).
Office Action (Final) dated Aug. 17, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,053).
Office Action (Non-Final) dated Aug. 24, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/482,980).
Office Action (Non-Final) dated Aug. 31, 2012 (Chinese Application No. 200980127945.7).
Office Action (Non-Final) dated Sep. 25, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,017).
Pelletier et al., “Plasma-Based Ion Implantation and Deposition: A Review of Physics, Technology, and Applications”, http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/84k974r2, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, May 16, 2005, pp. 1-69.
Rentsch, et al., “Technology Route Towards Industrial Appiication of Rear Passivated Silicon Solar Cells”, Conference Record of the 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion vol. 1 (2006) pp. 1008-1011.
Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 1, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/482,685).
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 24, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/482,980).
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 25, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/483,017).
Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 5, 2012 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,105).
Vervisch et al., “Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Applied to P+N Junction Solar Cells”, CP866, Ion, Implantation Technology, American Institute of Physics, vol. 866, Jan. 2006, pp. 253-256.
Written Opinion in dated May 10, 2012, (Singapore Patent Application No. 201106457-3).
Written Opinion in dated Jun. 8, 2012, (Singapore Patent Application No. 201009194-0).
Written Opinion dated Jun. 8, 2012, Singapore Patent Application No. 201009191-6.
Younger et al. “Ion Implantation Processing for High Performance Concentrator Solar Cells and Cell Assemblies,” Solar Cells, vol. 6, 1982, pp. 79-86.
“Implantation par Immersion Plasma (PULSION®),” Ion Beam Services (IBS), ZI Peynier Rousset, France, Dec. 2008.
Janssens et al., “Advanced Phosphorus Emitters for High Efficiency SI Solar Cells,” 24th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Hamburg, Germany Sep. 21-25, 2009.
Neuhaus et al., “Industrial Silicon Wafer Solar Cells,” Hindawi Publishing Corporation, vol. 2007, pp. 1-15, Sep. 14, 2007.
Nikiforov et al., “Large Volume ICP Sources for Plasma-Based Accelerators,” Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute (KERI), APAC 2004, Gyeongju, Korea.
Office Action (Non-Final) dated Dec. 5, 2012 (Chinese Application No. 200980128201.7).
Office Action (Non-Final) dated Jan. 14, 2013 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/728,105).
Office Action (Non-Final) dated Jan. 16, 2013 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/821,053).
Office Action (Non-Final) dated Jan. 28, 2013 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/482,685).
Steckl, “Particle-Beam Fabrication and in Situ Processing of Integrated Circuits,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 74, Issue 12.
Written Opinion dated Jun. 8, 2012, (Singapore Patent Application No. 201009191-6).
Written Opinion in dated Jan. 11, 2013, (Singapore Patent Application No. 201106457-3).
Xu, et al., Nanopantography results: continuous writing of etched Si ‘nano-Ts’ with AR+ / CI2.
“Varian Introduces a New High-Energy Ion Implant System for Optimized Performance and Lowest Cost of Ownership,” Press Release, Business Wire, Jul. 14, 1999, 1 pg.
Walther, S.R. et al., “Using Multiple Implant Regions to Reduce Development Wafer Usage,” Jan. 1, 2006, American Institute of Physics, CP866, Ion Implantation Technology, pp. 409-412.
Semiconductor Consulting Service publication: “Process Technology for the 21st Century,” Chapter 10-Substrates, Isolation, Well and Transistor Formation, Jan. 1999, downloaded from IC Knowledge.com, http://www.icknowledge.com/our—products/pt21c.html., pp. 10-1-10-4.
“Leading Semiconductor Manufacturer Selects Axcelis HE3 Ion Implantation Equipment; 300 mm Facility to Choose Axcelis Platform for High Energy Implant,” Business Wire, Oct. 17, 2000, 1 pg.
Kondratenko, S. et al, “Channeling Effects and Quad Chain Implantation Process Optimization for Low Energy Boron Ions,” abstract, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, Issue date: Sep. 22-27, 2002, Current version date: Jan. 7, 2004, 1 pg., downloaded from ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs—all.jsp?arnumber=1257941.
Nitodas, S.F., et al., “Advantages of single and mixed species chaining for high productivity in high and mid-energy implantation,” published Sep. 2002, Ion Implantation Technology, Current version date Jan. 7, 2004, abstract, downloaded from ieeexplore.ieee.org., 1 pg.
Eaton Nova (Axcelis) 200E2 H/C Implanter, data sheet, 2 pgs. , Jan. 1990.
Anders, André, “Plasma and Ion Sources in Large Area Coating: A Review,” Elsevier, www.sciencedirect.com, available Sep. 13, 2005, Surface and Coatings Technology 200 (2005) pp. 1893-1906.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090309039 A1 Dec 2009 US
Provisional Applications (5)
Number Date Country
61131687 Jun 2008 US
61131688 Jun 2008 US
61131698 Jun 2008 US
61133028 Jun 2008 US
61210545 Mar 2004 US