The present invention relates to an application switching method for a portable device, and more particularly to an application switching apparatus for a portable device which is not capable of multitasking.
Technological advances in portable information devices, such as a portable telephone, PDAs, and the like, allow the devices to perform many functions such as gaming, digital photography, audio reproduction and communications such as internet connection and many other functions. Therefore, the portable devices have become multi-functional devices and have many uses.
Therefore, a user may want to use multiple applications at the same time. Previously, a multitasking operating system had been used to launch multiple applications at the same time where all the applications are managed as a separate task. Thus, when a user wanted to switch to a different application, it shall effectively be a task switch, to display the other application.
The problem with this approach was that there was a lot of overhead required, as each application is defined as a task. Application development and maintenance was cumbersome because it required in-depth knowledge of the processing environment so development costs increased. Also, runtime costs were greater because a more complicated operating system was required. This lead to a cumbersome user interface, longer booting and shutdown times of the devices due to lengthy operating system initialization and shutdown, and more battery power consumption. There were also higher manufacturing costs, managing more tasks in memory required more memory, a more complicated operating system like Symbian involves more licensing costs, and more MIPS (millions of instructions per second) required.
As such, there is a need for an framework for application switching that provides the user the ability to launch many applications simultaneously and allows multiple applications to launch in a single task that keeps running costs and development costs low but allows users to switch between multiple applications on a device.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, multiple applications are launched on a device under the control of application switching framework so that the operating system is only running one task for all the applications. This single task is run under the control of an operating system. An application manager is run within this task. One or more applications are launched within this task under the control of the application manager. One of the applications is made the current application by switching, under user control, among the launched applications.
A list of application descriptors is maintained for all the launched applications. When switching, the application descriptor of one of the applications is used for displaying the application to a user on a screen. Each application descriptor contains forms of the launched applications. Each of the application descriptors contains a tree of forms with one root or parent form. A form represents an image to be displayed to the user. The image consists of text, pictures, bitmaps, or menus.
All the applications are initialized, but not launched, when the device is turned on. The applications may be closed, after being launched.
One of the applications may be displayed to a user on a screen. The user may be provided control over one of the applications.
These and other advantages of the invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reference to the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Theretofore, if a user was to choose one of the applications 206 on the list of currently launched applications, the operating system can cause the chosen application to be displayed, and give the user control over the application without actually closing the previously used application.
Referring now to
The application manager 305 controls the applications 307. The applications 307 are all under the control of the application manager 305. The application manager 305 coordinates and maintains the applications 307. The application manager 305 also provides the support to launch the applications 307. Each application 307 must register itself with the application manager 305.
In the protocol stacks layer 304, protocol stacks 308 are managed as separate tasks. Protocol stack task are responsible for the communication part of a device. Many applications need a communication system (e.g. to make a phone call), which is served by these tasks. 309 is the inter task communication mechanism. This is used to provide a communication among the tasks. All the tasks are responsible to run in coherence to provides the device functionality to the user. This is the mechanism that facilitates communication with each other. The inter task communication mechanism 309 is connected to every task and is a logical module which is implemented as part of each task. Every task can send a message to any other task with control and data information. Each task may receive messages from any other task. When Task A wants to send a message to Task B, Task A drops a message (with control and data information) into the Task B's mail box. Task B reads the message from it's Mail Box when needed which may contain many other messages and also the message from Task A.
Referring now to
The application manager 305 may move the application descriptors 604 in this stack 602 as requested by the user as described in reference to
Therefore, each application is a tree of forms (or windows) with one root/parent form (or window), although the application descriptor may contain other information. To enable switching between applications, a list of application descriptors (or contexts) is maintained where each application descriptor (or context) contains the forms (or windows) of one open (or launched) application. At a given time, one application will be the current application and whenever user wants to switch to another application, the application manager will move the appropriate application descriptor (or context) to the top of the stack and display the forms (or windows) on a screen and thereby allow the user to control the application.
Referring now to
Referring now to
If the application that the user wishes to launch is not currently active, then in step 914, the current application is notified that it is no longer the current application. Then, in step 915, the application descriptor of the selected application is moved to the top of the stack. Then, in step 916, the launch function of the application to launch is retrieved. In step 918, the launch function is run to create the forms to be displayed and make the launched application the current application. The process ends at step 920.
In this way, the user launches the applications 307 that the user thinks that they will need. Therefore, all of the launched applications may be switched between as described below with reference to
Referring now to
In step 1010, the selected application is made the new current application. In step 1012, the new current application is moved to the top of the application descriptors stack. In step 1014, the current application is notified of its new state. In step 1016, the application switcher is closed. The process ends in step 1018.
In this way, the user may switch between launched applications. If the user wishes to switch to a non-launched application, the user would have to launch the application as shown with reference to
Referring now to
Then, in step 1212, the initialization function is retrieved from the application descriptor for the application. Then, in step 1214, the application is initialized by running the initialization function. Then the process goes back to step 1205. If, in step 1205, it is determined that there are no more applications remaining on the list that have not been initialized, then the process moves to step 1206 where the idle screen application is launched. The process ends at step 1208.
Referring now to
If it is determined that all active applications are closed in step 1306, the process moves to step 1312, where the next application is retrieved from the list of initialized applications. In step 1314, it is determined whether all the applications have been de-initialized. If all of the applications have not been de-initialized, then the process moves to step 1316 where the application descriptor is retrieved from the list of initialized applications. Then, in step 1318, the de-initialization function is retrieved from the application descriptor. Then, in step 1320, the application is de-initialized by running the de-initialization function for the application. Then the process moves back to step 1314. If, in step 1314, it is determined that all of the applications have been de-initialized, then the process ends at step 1322.
The operating system and application manager described herein may be implemented using appropriately programmed device. Such devices are well known in the art, and may be implemented, for example, using well known processors, memory units, storage devices, computer software, and other components. A high level block diagram of an example of such a device or phone is shown in
Thus, the functioning of the phone will be defined by program instructions stored in memory 1110 and/or storage 1112 and the functioning will be controlled by processor 1104 executing the program instructions. Phone 1102 also includes one or more radio transceivers 1106 and an antenna 1105 for communicating with other devices via a network. Phone 1102 also includes keypad 1108, display 1107 and speaker and microphone 1109, which represents devices which allow for user interaction with the phone 1102 (e.g., keyboard, mouse, buttons, etc.). One skilled in the art will recognize that an implementation of an actual phone will contain other components as well, and that
The foregoing Detailed Description is to be understood as being in every respect illustrative and exemplary, but not restrictive, and the scope of the invention disclosed herein is not to be determined from the Detailed Description, but rather from the claims as interpreted according to the full breadth permitted by the patent laws. It is to be understood that the embodiments shown and described herein are only illustrative of the principles of the present invention and that various modifications may be implemented by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Those skilled in the art could implement various other feature combinations without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/001739 | 1/23/2007 | WO | 00 | 7/10/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/091248 | 7/31/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5608395 | Kurtz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5974438 | Neufeld | Oct 1999 | A |
6098169 | Ranganathan | Aug 2000 | A |
6401155 | Saville et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6823517 | Kalman | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6931544 | Kienhofer et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938251 | Chow et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6957071 | Holur et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6986141 | Diepstraten et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7123945 | Kokubo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7509487 | Lu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7581192 | Stabb et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7761853 | Hirata et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7836446 | Ode | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010032274 | Asami et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020137543 | Murnaghan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030115245 | Fujisawa | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030229683 | Oshima et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050003850 | Tsuda et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009510 | Tsuda et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050054372 | Tsuda et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107073 | Cheiky et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125802 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050223352 | Nishida | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060014574 | Linn | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031663 | Peller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047495 | Sanchez et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060129600 | Ode | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150194 | Xing et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060293088 | Kokubo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080120615 | Huang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080139190 | Bunte et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080170703 | Zivney | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090176528 | Moran et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 286 549 | Feb 2003 | EP |
2005284906 | Oct 2005 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Gray, Robert S., et al., “D'Agents: Applications and Performance of a Mobile-Agent System,” Thayer School of Engineering / Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, U.S.A., Received: Jan. 15, 2002; Revised: Jan. 15, 2002, [Retrieved on Sep. 13, 2007], Retrieved from the Internet: <URLcs.dartmouth.edu/-dfk/papers/gray:spe.pdf>. |
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US2007/01739 dated Feb. 19, 2008 (9 pages). |
Morris, D., et al., “An Appraisal of the Atlas Supervisor,” ACM Proceedings of the National Conference, Jan. 1, 1967, pp. 223-243. |
Hoare, C. A. R., “Monitors: An Operating System Structuring Concept,” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., New York, NY, vol. 17, No. 10, Oct. 1, 1974, pp. 549-557. |
Drew, D.L., “The LACONIQ Monitor: Time Sharing for Online Dialogues,” Communications of the Association for Computer Machinery, New York, NY, vol. 10, No. 12, Dec. 1, 1967, pp. 765-771. |
Bobrow, D.G., et al., “TENEX, A Paged Time Sharing System for the PDP-10,” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, vol. 15, No. 3, Mar. 1, 1972, pp. 135-143. |
EclipseME, “J2ME Development using Eclipse—From Zero to Mobile in Minutes,” Mar. 16, 2008, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: eclipseme.org/docs/news.html> [Retrieved on Mar. 25, 2010.]. |
Marejka, Richard, “Learning Path: MIDLet Life Cycle,” Sun Developer Network, Feb. 28, 2005, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: developers.sun.com/mobility/learn/midp/lifecycle/> [Retrieved on Mar. 25, 2010.]. |
Davis, V., et al., “Generative Approaches for Application Tailoring of Mobile Devices,” 43rd ACM Southeast Conference, Mar. 20, 2005, pp. 2-237-2-241, Kennesaw, GA. Retrieved from the Internet: <delivery.acm.org/10.1445/1170000/1167308/p237-davis.pdf> [Retrieved on Mar. 25, 2010.]. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Mar. 25, 2010 in Application No. EP 07 74 9069 (07749069.6). |
Examiner's Office Letter; Mailed Feb. 1, 2012 for the corresponding JP Application No. 2009-547206. |
Examiner's Office Letter; Mailed Dec. 25, 2012 for the corresponding JP Application No. 2009-547206. |
Notice of Preliminary Rejection; Mailed on Jul. 27, 2013 for corresponding KR Application No. 10-2009-7017496. |
Examiner's Decision of Refusal; Mailed Nov. 26, 2013 for corresponding JP Application No. 2009-547206. |
Notice of Preliminary Rejection; Mailed on Nov. 27, 2013 for corresponding KR Application No. 10-2009-7017496. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100138834 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |