Approximated parameter adaptation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10714134
  • Patent Number
    10,714,134
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 25, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 14, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
An apparatus can include a circuit configured to process an input signal using a set of channel parameters. The circuit can produce, using a first adaptation algorithm, a first set of channel parameters for use by the circuit as the set of channel parameters in processing the input signal. The circuit can further approximate a second set of channel parameters of a second adaptation algorithm for use by the circuit as the set of channel parameters in processing the input signal based on the first set of channel parameters and a relationship between a third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and a fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm. In addition, the circuit can perform the processing of the input signal using the second set of channel parameters as the set of channel parameters.
Description
SUMMARY

In certain embodiments, an apparatus may include a circuit configured to process an input signal using a set of channel parameters. The circuit may produce, using a first adaptation algorithm, a first set of channel parameters for use by the circuit as the set of channel parameters in processing the input signal. The circuit may further approximate a second set of channel parameters of a second adaptation algorithm for use by the circuit as the set of channel parameters in processing the input signal based on the first set of channel parameters and a relationship between a third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and a fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm. In addition, the circuit may perform the processing of the input signal using the second set of channel parameters as the set of channel parameters.


In certain embodiments, a system may include a channel circuit configured to process an input signal using a set of parameters and an adaptation circuit configured to produce, using a first adaptation algorithm, a first set of channel parameters for use by the circuit as the set of channel parameters in processing the input signal. The adaptation circuit may be further configured to approximate a second set of channel parameters of a second adaptation algorithm for use by the channel circuit as the set of channel parameters in processing the input signal based on the first set of channel parameters and a relationship between a third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and a fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm. In addition, the adaptation circuit may be configured to output the second set of channel parameters to the channel circuit for use as the set of channel parameters in processing the input signal.


In certain embodiments, a method may include producing, by a circuit configured to process an input signal using a set of channel parameters and using a first adaptation algorithm, a first set of channel parameters for use by the circuit as the set of channel parameters in processing the input signal. The method may further include approximating a second set of channel parameters of a second adaptation algorithm for use by the circuit as the set of channel parameters in processing the input signal based on the first set of channel parameters and a relationship between a third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and a fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm. Additionally, the method may include performing the processing of the input signal using the second set of channel parameters as the set of channel parameters.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a communication channel which includes approximated parameter adaptation, in accordance with certain embodiments of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method of approximated parameter adaptation, in accordance with certain embodiments of the present disclosure;



FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method of approximated parameter adaptation, in accordance with certain embodiments of the present disclosure;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system including approximated parameter adaptation, in accordance with certain embodiments of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description of the embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustrations. It is to be understood that features of the various described embodiments may be combined, other embodiments may be utilized, and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. It is also to be understood that features of the various embodiments and examples herein can be combined, exchanged, or removed without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.


In accordance with various embodiments, the methods and functions described herein may be implemented as one or more software programs running on a computer processor or controller. In accordance with another embodiment, the methods and functions described herein may be implemented as one or more software programs running on a computing device, such as a personal computer that is using a disc drive. Dedicated hardware implementations including, but not limited to, application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic arrays, and other hardware devices can likewise be constructed to implement the methods and functions described herein. Further, the methods described herein may be implemented as a computer readable storage medium or device including instructions that when executed cause a processor to perform the methods.


The present disclosure generally relates to parameter adaptation, and in some embodiments, the present disclosure may relates to approximating parameter adaptation for a first adaptation algorithm based on a change in parameters produced by a second adaptation algorithm.


Some systems, such as electrical, electronic, motor drive, processing, or other systems may receive a signal of interest and process that signal based on parameters. For example, a read channel of a communication system or a magnetic recording storage system may utilize adaptive parameters to process an input signal. In some systems, a detector may generate a data sequence based on an equalized sample sequence and adaptive parameters. An adaptation component may include various adaptive functions or algorithms for adapting the parameters of the detector. For example, the adaptive parameters may be coefficients or taps of the filter circuits of a soft-output Viterbi algorithm (SOVA) detector (e.g. of finite impulse response filters (FIRs) or of data-dependent FIRs (DDFIRs) of the SOVA detector) or parameters such as branch variances or branch biases of a SOVA detector.


Examples of types of adaptation algorithms may include Minimum Bit-Error Rate (MBER) adaptation, minimum mean squared error (MMSE) adaptation, least mean square adaptation, recursive least squares (RLS) adaptation, and similar adaptation algorithms.


In some embodiments, a first adaptation algorithm may be used to adapt a set of adaptive parameters under at least one set of circumstances (e.g. under normal operation). In at least some other circumstances, a second adaptation algorithm may be used to approximate the set of adaptive parameters for the first adaptation algorithm based on a predetermined relationship between the set of adaptive parameters as produced by the first adaptation algorithm and the set of adaptive parameters as produced by the second adaptation algorithm. For example, such an approximation may be performed under circumstances in which the first adaptation algorithm may be ill suited to handle or in which the first adaptation algorithm may provide erroneous updates.


An example of such a system is discussed below with regard to FIG. 1.


Referring to FIG. 1, a block diagram of a communication channel which includes approximated parameter adaptation is shown and is generally designated 100. System 100 can include an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 102 that may be coupled to an equalizer 104. The equalizer 104 may be coupled to a detector 106 and an adaptation component 108. The detector 106 may be coupled to a decoder 110 and the adaptation component 108. The adaptation component 108 may be connected to the detector 106. In addition, the decoder 110 may include an output from the communication channel 100 and be connected to the adaptation component 108. The adaptation component 108 may include a memory for storing manufacturing data 112 or access manufacturing data 112 stored in a separate memory (not shown).


Each of the ADC 102, equalizer 104, detector 106, adaptation component 108, and decoder 110 may be a separate circuit, a system on chip (SOC), firmware, a processor(s), or other system not listed, or any combination thereof.


As discussed in detail below, in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, the parameters that are adapted are the parameters of the detector 106. While the discussion herein utilizes parameters of a detector of a read channel as examples, the disclosed techniques and systems may apply to other circuits or parameters. Many variations would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of this disclosure.


In operation, the ADC 102 may sample a continuous-time signal x(t) 114 at regular intervals and may quantize the signal to produce a digitized sequence of samples x 116.


The equalizer 104 may receive the digitized sequence of samples x 116 and generate an equalized sample sequence y 118. In some examples, the equalizer may operate to shorten the intersymbol interference (ISI) length, or memory, of a channel. Further, the equalizer 102 may act to absorb variations in the input signal or noise statistics that may occur over time. In general, the equalizer 104 may produce a consistent, known, input signal to the detector 106 such that the detector 106 may estimate the data sequence corresponding to the signal x(t) 114 based on coefficients or parameters p 124 provided by the adaptation component 108.


The detector 106 may operate to determine (or estimate) a data sequence {circumflex over (b)}D 120 of bit values corresponding to the signal x(t) 114 based on the equalized sample sequence y 118 and the parameters or coefficients p 124 provided by the adaptation component 108. Specifically, the parameters p 124 may be provided to the detector to be used for estimation of the data sequence {circumflex over (b)}D 120. The data sequence {circumflex over (b)}D 120 may be representative of the probability that each bit is a zero or one. The values 124 may be represented as logs of the ratios of these probabilities and may be referred to as log likelihood ratios or LLRs. The detector 106 may act to generate the LLRs values based on knowledge of a channel response (e.g. the expected channel output for each possible written/transmitted data pattern). In some examples, the detector 108 may employ a Soft-Output Viterbi Algorithm (SOVA).


The generated data sequence {circumflex over (b)}D 120 may be passed to the decoder 110 which may generate decoded data b 122 if the data sequence {circumflex over (b)}D 120 is successfully decoded or extrinsic information or EXT (not shown) which may be representative of the probability that each bit is a zero or one. The decoder 110 may generate the decoded data b 122 or the EXT based on a structure of a utilized code. Though not shown for ease of illustration, in some implementations, the EXT may be returned to the detector (e.g. for use as part in an iterative decoding process being performed by the detector 106 and decoder 110).


The adaptation component 108 may operate to receive the equalized sample sequence y 118, the data sequence {circumflex over (b)}D 120 and the decoded data b 122 and adapt the parameters 124 of the detector 106.


More particularly, the detector 106 may be a SOVA detector. In some embodiments, the parameters 124 of the SOVA detector may be adapted using Minimum Bit-Error Rate (MBER) adaptation in normal operation. More particularly, MBER adaptation of the SOVA detector parameters may be run on sectors in normal operation which the decoder 110 can correctly decode the written data (e.g. thereby re-producing the written data and providing b 122 to the adaptation component). The decoded data b 122 may be fed back to the MBER adaptation together with the stored equalized sample sequence y 118 (or a subset of them).


In cases where MBER adaptation may be ill suited or in which the MBER adaptation may provide erroneous updates, approximated updated MBER parameters may be determined based on the set of adaptive parameters produced by an LMS adaptation algorithm and a predetermined relationship between the set of adaptive parameters as produced by the MBER and the set of adaptive parameters as produced by the LMS and stored as manufacturing data 112. For example, MBER adaptation may be ill suited or the MBER adaptation of detector parameters may provide erroneous updates when the decoder fails to decode the written data (b 122) and adaptation is to be performed using detector decision data ({circumflex over (b)}D 120) that may include bit errors (e.g. decision-directed adaptation). When performing decision-directed adaptation, the MBER cost function may cause the adaptive coefficients to move in such a way as to reinforce the decision errors, which may further degrade the detector performance. Other factors or conditions may also be used for triggering approximated MBER parameter generation. For example, the approximated MBER parameter generation may be triggered when a sector of interest has failed to decode after a threshold number of iterative decoding iterations and has sufficiently different noise statistics from adjacent sectors that adaptation on the adjacent sectors may not be useful.


The manufacturing data 112 may be generated during manufacturing or during a training process in the field. In the case of a hard disc drive or other devices whose parameters vary across the medium, the manufacturing data 112 may be generated for each storage unit (e.g. sectors, pages, etc.) or for larger regions or zones that may corresponding to groups of tracks (which is the case in the example discussed below). During generation of the manufacturing data, both MBER and LMS parameter sets may be generated using known write data. The generated parameter sets, information regarding relationships between the parameters sets (e.g. differences) or both may be stored.


In operation, when the decoder 110 fails to decode the data stored in a sector, the detector decisions 120 may be used to generate a current LMS parameter set. Then, in some embodiments, the difference between the MBER and LMS parameter sets generated in training and stored as manufacturing data 112 may be added to the current LMS parameter to generate approximated MBER parameters.


Application of this process to an example type of SOVA detector parameter is given below, specifically, for branch biases.


The branch metric in a log-domain Viterbi or SOVA may take the form:







bm
=


(

1

σ
2


)




(

z
-

z
t


)

2



,





where σ2 may be the branch variance, z may be the DDFIR output for this branch (or FIR if there is no data dependent filtering) and zt may be the branch bias. With a MMSE cost function in LMS adaptation, zt=zavg=E[z] (e.g. the branch mean may be conditioned on this being the correct branch). However, adapting with an MBER cost function may adapt zt away from zavg to minimize BER in the presence of complex noise statistics.


During manufacturing, for each zone, both the MBER parameter set zt and the measured MMSE parameter set zavg may be determined. The manufacturing parameters sets may be denoted as zt(m) and zavg(m).


When the decoder 110 fails to decode a particular sector in field operations, updated MBER parameters may allow the sector to be decoded. For example, where the failure to decode is due to track squeeze, it may be likely that the sector would decode if updated MBER parameters for this sector were used. However, MBER adaptation may not be used because the adaptation would be based on detector decisions which may include errors. Instead, the adaptation component 108 may generate or adapt current MMSE parameters zavg(f) using the detector decisions. The adaptation component may then use the current MMSE parameters zavg(f) to approximate the updated MBER parameters using:

zt(f)≈zt(m)+(zavg(f)−zavg(m))


This may be effective because the difference between the MBER biases and MMSE biases may be the same for the manufacturing parameter sets as it is for the in-field error recovery parameter sets. As zt(m) and zavg(m) are stored in the manufacturing data 112 from the manufacturing process, the adaptation component can perform the approximation after computing zavg(f) from detector decisions and the LMS algorithm. In some embodiments, the LMS adaptation may utilize total information from the decoder (e.g. LDPC sliced total information) which may be derived from the detector decisions and the extrinsic information.


Although the above examples compute the approximated parameters in response to a decoding failure, embodiments are not so limited. For example, the approximated parameters may be generated by the adaptation component 108 in an on-the-fly and continuing basis, and used based on a mode selection in the detector 106 or adaptation component 108 that may allow for use of the approximated parameters in response to triggering conditions (e.g. the decoder 110 failing to decode the sector thirty (30) times).


Referring to FIG. 2, a flowchart of a method of approximated parameter adaptation is shown and is generally designated 200. More particularly, flowchart 200 may be manufacturing or training operations to generate the manufacturing data 112 detailed above with respect to FIG. 1 for a current zone.


The system may receive a plurality of samples of a continuous time input signal for a current zone along with corresponding known data at 202. The system may then generate a sequence of digitized samples based on the continuous time input signal at 204. At 206, the system may generate an equalized sample sequence based on the digitized samples.


Next, the system may produce MBER based estimates of a data sequence of the input signal based on the equalized sample sequence and updatable MBER detector parameters at 208. At 210, the system may produce MMSE based estimates of a data sequence of the input signal based on the equalized sample sequence and updatable MMSE detector parameters. In some embodiments, the decoder may perform decoding operations for one or more of the MBER based estimates and the MMSE based estimates.


At 212, the system may perform an MBER based adaptation process on the MBER detector parameters based on the known values and MBER estimates. Then, at 214, the system may perform an MMSE based adaptation process on the MMSE detector parameters based on the known values and MMSE estimates.


The system may then determine if the MBER detector parameters and the MMSE detector parameters have stabilized at 216. If the parameters have stabilized, at 218, the system may store MBER based detector parameters and MMSE based detector parameters for the current zone (e.g. as manufacturing data 112). In some embodiments, the system may also determine and store relationship data (e.g. differences) between the MBER detector parameters and the MMSE detector parameters. Additionally or alternatively, some or all relationship data may be generated when the zone parameters are utilized. If the parameters have not stabilized, the system may return to 208 for additional adaptation operations. Though not shown, in some embodiments, additional operations, such as one or more of operations 202-206 may also be repeated when the parameters have not stabilized or the stability determination may be may be performed for new samples until the parameters have stabilized for general data samples of the zone.


Referring to FIG. 3, a flowchart of a method of approximated parameter adaptation is shown and is generally designated 300. More particularly, flowchart 300 may be detection, decoding and approximated parameter adaptation during a read or receive operation and may be performed as detailed above with respect to FIG. 1.


In operation, at 302, the system may receive a plurality of samples of a continuous time input signal, for example, for a current data sector. At 304, the system may generate a sequence of digitized samples based on the continuous time input signal, for example, using an ADC. Next, the system may generate an equalized sample sequence based on the digitized samples at 306.


At 308, the system may produce estimates of a data sequence of the input signal based on the equalized sample sequence and updatable MBER detector parameter, for example, using a SOVA detector. Decoding operation may then be performed on the detector estimates at 310, for example, using a LDPC decoder.


At 312, the system may determine whether the decoder was successful. If so, the system may halt the operations for the current sector, output the decoded data sequence and update the MBER based detector parameters based on the successful decoded data sequence using MBER adaptation at 314. If the decoder was unsuccessful, the system may determine if a threshold number of decoding attempts have failed for the current sector at 316. If not, the system may return to 308 for an additional detection and decoding attempt. If a threshold number of decoding failures have occurred for the current sector, the system may begin approximated parameter adaptation at 318. More particularly, at 318, the system may adapt MMSE based detector parameters for the current sector by performing detection operations using the MMSE based detector parameters, performing decoding on the MMSE based detector estimates, and updating the MMSE based detector parameters using MMSE adaptation.


Next, at 320, the system may approximate updated MBER detector parameters based on MMSE based detector parameters and a relationship data of previous values for the MBER detector parameters and the MMSE based detector parameters for a current zone. For example, the approximate updated MBER detector parameters may generated by adding a difference between the previously generated and stored MBER detector parameters and the MMSE based detector parameters to the currently generated MMSE based detector parameters for the current sector as discussed above with regard to FIG. 1.


Then, at 322, the system may perform detector operations to produce estimates of a data sequence of the input signal based on the equalized sample sequence and the approximated updated MBER detector parameters and perform decoding operations based on estimates generated using the approximated updated MBER detector parameters (e.g. one or more iterative detection and decoding operations may be performed using the approximated updated MBER detector parameters). Though not shown, if the decoding operation at 322 is successful, the decoding result may be output for the current sector and MBER adaptation may be performed based on one or both of the approximated updated MBER detector parameters and the MBER detector parameters using the successful decoding result. If the decoding operation at 322 is unsuccessful, other recovery operations may be triggered or the process 300 may terminate in an error state.


All steps listed for the methods 200 and 300 may be applied to systems that have adaptive parameters. As mentioned above, other adaptation algorithms could be substituted for MBER and MMSE and these processes may be utilized for parameters of other circuits such as decoders, equalizers, ADCs and so on. Many other variations would be apparent in view of this disclosure. Components and circuits used to perform the operations in the method may be discrete, integrated into a system on chip (SOC), or other circuits. Further, the steps can be carried out in a processor (e.g. a digital signal processor), implemented in software, implemented via firmware, or by other means.


Referring to FIG. 4, a block diagram of a system including approximated parameter adaptation is shown and generally designated 400. The system 400 can be an example of a data storage device (DSD), and may be an example implementation of system 100. The DSD 416 can optionally connect to and be removable from a host device 414, which can be a device or system having stored data, such as a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a server, a digital video recorder, a photocopier, a telephone, a music player, other electronic devices or systems not listed, or any combination thereof. The data storage device 416 can communicate with the host device 414 via the hardware/firmware based host interface circuit 412 that may include a connector (not shown) that allows the DSD 416 to be physically connected and disconnected from the host 414.


The DSD 416 can include a system processor 402, which may be a programmable controller, and associated memory 404. The system processor 402 may be part of a system on chip (SOC). A buffer 406 may temporarily store data during read and write operations and can include a command queue. The read/write (R/W) channel 410 can encode data during write operations to, and reconstruct data during read operations from, the data storage medium 408. The data storage medium 408 is shown and described as a hard disc drive, but may be other types of magnetic medium, such as a flash medium, optical medium, or other medium, or any combination thereof.


The R/W channel 410 may receive data from more than one data storage medium at a time, and in some embodiments can also receive multiple data signals concurrently, such as from more than one output of a read head. For example, storage systems having two-dimensional magnetic recording (TDMR) systems can have multiple reading or recording elements, and can read from two tracks simultaneously or nearly simultaneously. Multi-dimensional recording (MDR) systems can receive two or more inputs from multiple sources (e.g. recording heads, flash memory, optical memory, and so forth). The R/W channel 410 can combine multiple inputs and provide a single output, as described in examples herein.


The block 418 can implement all of or part of the systems and functionality of systems and methods 100, 200, and 300. In some embodiments, the block 418 may be a separate circuit, integrated into the R/W channel 410, included in a system on chip, firmware, software, or any combination thereof.


The illustrations, examples, and embodiments described herein are intended to provide a general understanding of the structure of various embodiments. The illustrations are not intended to serve as a complete description of all of the elements and features of apparatus and systems that utilize the structures or methods described herein. Many other embodiments may be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the disclosure. Other embodiments may be utilized and derived from the disclosure, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure. For example, the figures and above description provide examples of architecture and voltages that may be varied, such as for design requirements of a system. Moreover, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any subsequent arrangement designed to achieve the same or similar purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown.


This disclosure is intended to cover any and all subsequent adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above examples, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the description. Additionally, the illustrations are merely representational and may not be drawn to scale. Certain proportions within the illustrations may be exaggerated, while other proportions may be reduced. Accordingly, the disclosure and the figures are to be regarded as illustrative and not restrictive.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: a circuit including a Soft-Output Viterbi Algorithm (SOVA) detector configured to process an input signal using a selected set of channel parameters being branch biases of the SOVA detector, the circuit further configured to: produce, using a first adaptation algorithm, a first set of channel parameters for use by the circuit as the selected set of channel parameters in processing the input signal;approximate a second set of channel parameters of a second adaptation algorithm for use by the circuit as the selected set of channel parameters in processing the input signal based on the first set of channel parameters and a relationship between a third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and a fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm;process the input signal using the second set of channel parameters as the selected set of channel parameters; andthe first adaptation algorithm being a minimum mean squared error (MMSE) adaptation algorithm and the second adaptation algorithm being a Minimum Bit-Error Rate (MBER) adaptation algorithm.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a memory storing the third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and the fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising the circuit further including a detector that performs the processing of the input signal using the selected set of channel parameters, the circuit further configured to: perform processing of the input signal using a fifth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm as the selected set of channel parameters in processing the input signal to produce a detection result;determine that a decoding of one or more detection results produced by the detector using the fifth set of channel parameters has failed a threshold number of times; andat least partly in response to the determining the decoding has failed the threshold number of times, perform the processing of the input signal using the second set of channel parameters as the selected set of channel parameters.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3, further comprising the circuit configured to: determine that a decoding of one or more detection results produced by the detector using the second set of channel parameters has succeeded; andat least partly in response to the determining the decoding has succeeded, adapt, using the second adaptation algorithm, the second set of channel parameters using the successful decoding result.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising the circuit further including a detector that performs the processing of the input signal using the selected set of channel parameters, the circuit further configured to: perform processing of the input signal using a fifth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm as the selected set of channel parameters in processing the input signal to produce a detection result;determine that a decoding of one or more detection results produced by the detector using the fifth set of channel parameters has succeeded after less than a threshold number of failures; andat least partly in response to the determining the decoding has succeeded, adapt, using the second adaptation algorithm, the fifth set of channel parameters using the successful decoding result.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a memory storing the third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and the fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm;the input signal being a readback signal read from a sector of a magnetic storage medium; andthe third set of channel parameters and the fourth set of channel parameters corresponding to an area of the magnetic storage medium including the sector and being generated during a manufacturing process including reading back known data written to the area of the magnetic storage medium including the sector.
  • 7. A system comprising: a channel circuit including a Soft-Output Viterbi Algorithm (SOVA) detector configured to process an input signal using a selected set of parameters being branch biases of the SOVA detector;an adaptation circuit configured to: produce, using a first adaptation algorithm, a first set of channel parameters for use by the circuit as the selected set of parameters in processing the input signal;approximate a second set of channel parameters of a second adaptation algorithm for use by the channel circuit as the selected set of parameters in processing the input signal based on the first set of channel parameters and a relationship between a third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and a fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm; andoutput the second set of channel parameters to the channel circuit as the selected set of parameters to process the input signal with; andthe first adaptation algorithm being a MMSE adaptation algorithm and the second adaptation algorithm being a MBER adaptation algorithm.
  • 8. The system of claim 7 further comprising: a memory storing the third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and the fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm;the input signal being a digitized sample sequence corresponding to a sector of a magnetic storage medium; andthe third set of channel parameters and the fourth set of channel parameters corresponding to an area of the magnetic storage medium including the sector and being generated during a manufacturing process including reading back known data written to the area of the magnetic storage medium including the sector.
  • 9. The system of claim 8 further comprising: an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) circuit configured to generate one or more ADC samples based on an readback signal corresponding to the sector;an equalizer circuit configured to receive digital samples from the ADC circuit and to equalize the digital samples to generate the digitized sample sequence; anda decoder configured to receive an output of the SOVA detector processing the input signal using the set of parameters and to perform decoding on the output of the SOVA detector.
  • 10. The system of claim 7 further comprising the channel circuit being a detector and the adaptation circuit being further configured to: output a fifth set of channel parameters to the channel circuit for use as the selected set of parameters in processing the input signal to produce one or more detection results, the fifth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm;determine that a decoding of the one or more detection results produced by the detector using the fifth set of channel parameters has failed a threshold number of times; andat least partly in response to the determining the decoding has failed the threshold number of times, perform the processing of the input signal using the second set of channel parameters as the selected set of parameters.
  • 11. The system of claim 7 further comprising the channel circuit being a detector and the adaptation circuit being further configured to: output a fifth set of channel parameters to the channel circuit for use as the selected set of parameters in processing the input signal to produce one or more detection results, the fifth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm;determine that a decoding of the one or more detection results produced by the detector using the fifth set of channel parameters has succeeded after less than a threshold number of failures; andat least partly in response to the determining the decoding has succeeded, adapt, using the second adaptation algorithm, the fifth set of channel parameters using the successful decoding result.
  • 12. A method comprising: producing, by a circuit including a Soft-Output Viterbi Algorithm (SOVA) detector configured to process an input signal using a selected set of channel parameters and using a first adaptation algorithm, a first set of channel parameters for use by the circuit as the selected set of channel parameters as branch biases of the SOVA detector to perform processing of the input signal;approximating a second set of channel parameters of a second adaptation algorithm for use by the circuit as the selected set of channel parameters in processing the input signal based on the first set of channel parameters and a relationship between a third set of channel parameters generated using the first adaptation algorithm and a fourth set of channel parameters generated using the second adaptation algorithm;processing the input signal using the second set of channel parameters as the selected set of channel parameters; andthe first adaptation algorithm being a minimum mean squared error (MMSE) adaptation algorithm and the second adaptation algorithm being a Minimum Bit-Error Rate (MBER) adaptation algorithm.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 further comprising: the input signal being a digitized sample sequence corresponding to a sector of a magnetic storage medium;the third set of channel parameters and the fourth set of channel parameters corresponding to an area of the magnetic storage medium including the sector and being generated during a manufacturing process including reading back known data written to the area of the magnetic storage medium including the sector; andthe relationship between the third set of channel parameters and the fourth set of channel parameters being a difference.
US Referenced Citations (165)
Number Name Date Kind
4984101 Kanota et al. Jan 1991 A
5321564 Takahashi Jun 1994 A
5461644 Bermans et al. Oct 1995 A
5543978 Park Aug 1996 A
5621769 Wan et al. Apr 1997 A
5654765 Kim Aug 1997 A
5742532 Duyne et al. Apr 1998 A
5862192 Huszar et al. Jan 1999 A
5970093 Lantremange Oct 1999 A
6111712 Vishakhadatta et al. Aug 2000 A
6157510 Schreck et al. Dec 2000 A
6181213 Chang Jan 2001 B1
6222592 Patel Apr 2001 B1
6320920 Beyke Nov 2001 B1
6377552 Moran et al. Apr 2002 B1
6396887 Ware et al. May 2002 B1
6438185 Huttunen Aug 2002 B1
6505222 Davis et al. Jan 2003 B1
6519107 Ehrlich et al. Feb 2003 B1
6549587 Li Apr 2003 B1
6580676 Yanagisawa et al. Jun 2003 B1
6581182 Lee Jun 2003 B1
6633894 Cole Oct 2003 B1
6665308 Rakib et al. Dec 2003 B1
6670901 Brueske et al. Dec 2003 B2
6687073 Kupferman Feb 2004 B1
6697891 Emberty et al. Feb 2004 B2
6707772 Marrec et al. Mar 2004 B1
6738205 Moran et al. May 2004 B1
6738215 Yatsu May 2004 B2
6950258 Takaishi Sep 2005 B2
6993291 Parssinen et al. Jan 2006 B2
7046701 Mohseni et al. May 2006 B2
7085330 Shirali Aug 2006 B1
7133233 Ray et al. Nov 2006 B1
7133239 Hartman et al. Nov 2006 B1
7245448 Urata Jul 2007 B2
7298573 Kitamura Nov 2007 B2
7324437 Czylwik et al. Jan 2008 B1
7362432 Roth Apr 2008 B2
7440208 McEwen et al. Oct 2008 B1
7929238 Vasquez Apr 2011 B1
7940667 Coady May 2011 B1
7948703 Yang May 2011 B1
8027117 Sutardja et al. Sep 2011 B1
8139301 Li et al. Mar 2012 B1
8160181 Song et al. Apr 2012 B1
8172755 Song et al. May 2012 B2
8296637 Varnica et al. Oct 2012 B1
8400726 Wu et al. Mar 2013 B1
8441751 Song et al. May 2013 B1
8456977 Honma Jun 2013 B2
8479086 Xia et al. Jul 2013 B2
8514506 Li et al. Aug 2013 B1
8539328 Jin et al. Sep 2013 B2
8542766 Chekhovstov et al. Sep 2013 B2
8543894 Varnica et al. Sep 2013 B1
8699556 Sarrigeorgidis Apr 2014 B1
8713413 Bellorado et al. Apr 2014 B1
8724245 Smith et al. May 2014 B1
8755139 Zou et al. Jun 2014 B1
8760794 Coker et al. Jun 2014 B1
8767341 Coker et al. Jul 2014 B1
8780477 Guo et al. Jul 2014 B1
8837068 Liao et al. Sep 2014 B1
8861111 Liao et al. Oct 2014 B1
8861112 Pan et al. Oct 2014 B1
8887033 Varnica et al. Nov 2014 B1
8953276 Pokharel et al. Feb 2015 B1
9007707 Lu et al. Apr 2015 B1
9019642 Xia et al. Apr 2015 B1
9025269 Wong et al. May 2015 B1
9064537 Nie et al. Jun 2015 B1
9082418 Ong et al. Jul 2015 B2
9093115 Fung et al. Jul 2015 B1
9099132 Grundvig et al. Aug 2015 B1
9129650 Mathew et al. Sep 2015 B2
9147416 Grundvig et al. Sep 2015 B2
9189315 Varnica et al. Nov 2015 B1
9196298 Zhang et al. Nov 2015 B1
9239754 Wu Jan 2016 B2
9245579 Song et al. Jan 2016 B2
9245580 Lu et al. Jan 2016 B1
9246668 Yu et al. Jan 2016 B1
9257135 Ong et al. Feb 2016 B2
9257145 Soderbloom et al. Feb 2016 B1
9286915 Dziak et al. Mar 2016 B1
9288789 Nakashima Mar 2016 B2
9311937 Zou et al. Apr 2016 B2
9311959 Fan et al. Apr 2016 B1
9385757 Nangare Jul 2016 B1
9401161 Jury et al. Jul 2016 B1
9424878 Dziak et al. Aug 2016 B1
9431052 Oberg et al. Aug 2016 B2
9489976 Jury et al. Nov 2016 B2
9508369 Chu et al. Nov 2016 B2
9536563 Liu et al. Jan 2017 B1
9542972 Nayak et al. Jan 2017 B1
9564157 Trantham Feb 2017 B1
9590803 Derras et al. Mar 2017 B2
9645763 Sankaranarayanan et al. May 2017 B2
9672850 Grundvig et al. Jun 2017 B2
9728221 Oberg et al. Aug 2017 B2
9947362 Venkataramani et al. Apr 2018 B1
9998136 Wu Jun 2018 B1
10164760 Bellorado et al. Dec 2018 B1
10177771 Bellorado et al. Jan 2019 B1
10180868 Alhussien et al. Jan 2019 B2
10276197 Bellorado et al. Apr 2019 B2
10276233 Danjean et al. Apr 2019 B1
10297281 Bellorado et al. May 2019 B1
10469290 Marrow et al. Nov 2019 B1
10498565 Azenkot et al. Dec 2019 B1
20020080898 Agazzi et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020181439 Orihashi et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030185114 Liaw Oct 2003 A1
20030198152 Morishima Oct 2003 A1
20030198165 Mouri et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040028148 Dowling Feb 2004 A1
20040101068 Wang et al. May 2004 A1
20040228397 Bach Nov 2004 A1
20050117243 Serizawa Jun 2005 A1
20060215290 Kurtas et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070139805 Mead Jun 2007 A1
20070139806 Southerland et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070177292 Bui et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080007855 Vityaev et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080158711 Bliss et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175309 Fimoff et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090028252 Lu Jan 2009 A1
20090097606 Hutchins et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090141386 Miura Jun 2009 A1
20090262870 Ashbrook et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090323214 Grundvig et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100290153 Hampshire Nov 2010 A1
20110002375 Honma Jan 2011 A1
20110072335 Liu Mar 2011 A1
20110090773 Yu et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110176400 Gerasimov Jul 2011 A1
20120082018 Gushima et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120105994 Bellorado et al. May 2012 A1
20120155577 Shukla et al. Jun 2012 A1
20130076433 Fratti Mar 2013 A1
20130201838 Homchaudhuri et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140009192 Suzuki Jan 2014 A1
20140035638 Bode Feb 2014 A1
20140079109 Serbetli Mar 2014 A1
20140223114 Wang et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150003221 Sankaranarayanan et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150279398 Fan et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150355838 Chen et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160112218 Abe Apr 2016 A1
20160293205 Jury et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160351227 Koshino Dec 2016 A1
20170125089 Sankaranarayanan et al. May 2017 A1
20170125110 Sankaranarayanan et al. May 2017 A1
20170236592 Alhussien et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170249206 Jeong et al. Aug 2017 A1
20180011753 Alhussien et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180012663 Alhussien et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180062623 Pagnanelli Mar 2018 A1
20180277158 Kishino Sep 2018 A1
20180367164 Marrow et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190130967 Danjean et al. May 2019 A1
20200065262 Bellorado Feb 2020 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Y. B. Nechaev, G. A. Kashenko and O. A. Plaksenko, “Increasing efficiency of information transmission with interference influence by the use of multi-parameter adaptation,” East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS 2013), Rostov-on-Don, 2013, pp. 1-4. (Year: 2013).
Bellorado et al., “Target Parameter Adaptation”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/334,167, filed Oct. 25, 2016, Seagate Technology LLC.
Guo, Yuanbin , “An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2006, pp. 1-18.
Hicks, James , “Overloaded Array Processing with Spatially Reduced Search Joint Detection”, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, May 10, 2000, pp. 1-144.
Mohammad, Maruf , “Blind Acquisition of Short Burst with Per-Survivor Processing (PSP)”, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Nov. 26, 2002, pp. 1-127.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180367164 A1 Dec 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62522248 Jun 2017 US