Patent Application
20130224472
The present invention relates to an aqueous system for coating low surface energy surfaces and to coated surfaces formed therefrom.
Conventional aqueous micellar delivery systems have been used predominantly in the pharmaceutical industry to provide both controlled delivery of drugs and controlled release of pharmaceutical agents. A micellar solution is one that contains at least one surfactant at a concentration greater than the critical micelle concentration (“CMC”). In the case of aqueous micellar solutions, when a hydrophobic or less water soluble material such as an oil is emulsified in the micellar solution, an emulsion results. Due to the often high surfactant concentrations used in many emulsions, the resulting surfactant stabilized emulsion droplets are often very stable. The good stability against coalescence also makes emulsion droplets ideal carriers for other materials. This technology is typically used in the pharmaceutical industry for controlled delivery of pharmaceutical agents such as antibiotics, antimicrobials, antivirals, cardiovascular and renal agents. These agents are commonly incorporated into the hydrophobic component of the carrier emulsion. Frequently, such emulsions are comprised of a hydrophobic material selected from the group consisting of a long chain carboxylic acid, long chain carboxylic acid ester, long chain carboxylic acid alcohol and mixtures thereof.
A permutation of these aqueous micellar delivery systems are microemulsions which form easily, even spontaneously, in the presence of typically high emulsifier concentrations. Microemulsions are particularly useful as delivery vehicles because a range of materials can be contained therein that would otherwise be sensitive to water, such as hydrolysis sensitive materials. In typical pharmaceutical microemulsion applications, the hydrophobic material is a water insoluble organic material that is emulsified by surfactants to form a discontinuous phase in a continuous aqueous phase (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,952,004 to Rudnic, et al.). Such microemulsions can be extremely stable and can provide a useful delivery means. For example, pharmaceutical agents may be dispersed into the hydrophobic material and delivered as part of the aqueous emulsion.
Emulsion technology is also used to create polymeric dispersions wherein a monomer is first emulsified in an aqueous surfactant solution and then polymerized. The resulting emulsion polymers, commonly referred to as latexes, have found many uses including paints and coatings. In order for a latex to spread across the substrate surface and form a uniform coating, it is necessary for it to “wet” the substrate to which it is applied. “Wetting” results when the contact angle, θ, between the aqueous latex and the solid substrate is less than about 90 degrees. Spontaneous wetting occurs when the surface energy between the solid and liquid, γSL is less than the surface energy between the solid and air, γSA. The relationship between these parameters and the liquid-air surface energy, γLA, is given by the relationship below:
γSL=γSA−γLA*cos(θ)
This relationship is very important when trying to coat a low surface energy substrate (low γSA), such as for example, materials with a surface energy below about 40 dynes/cm, because a very low γSL is required.
One low surface energy substrate of particular interest is polytetrafluoroethylene (“PTFE”) and microporous polytetrafluoroethylene. Due to the inherent hydrophobicity of PTFE, membranes of these materials are of particular interest when in the form of repellent products such as rainwear. Expanded microporous, liquid waterproof polytetrafluoroethylene materials, such as those available from W.L. Gore and Associates, Inc., sold under the trademark GORE-TEX®, as well as expanded PTFE products available from other suppliers are especially well suited for this purpose. The expanded PTFE materials are liquid waterproof, but allow water vapor, in the form of perspiration, to pass through. Polyurethanes and other polymers have been used for this purpose also. To confer good flexibility and light weight in the materials for use in the textile sector, the microporous layer should be made as thin as possible. However, a thinner membrane will generally mean a loss of performance, and thin coatings run the risk of decreasing water repellency.
Low surface energy substrates have historically been coated by solutions having a low γLA and low contact angle. Suitable coating processes for microporous low surface energy materials are described in the art, many of which rely on solvents to wet the desired substrate. For example, EP 0581168 (Mitsubishi) describes the use of perfluoroalkyl methacrylates and perfluoroalkylethyl acrylates for porous polyethylene and polypropylene membranes. These substances are held in physical contact with the surface of the polyolefin porous membrane. The fluorinated monomer or fluorinated monomer and a crosslinking monomer together with a polymerization initiator are dissolved in a suitable solvent to prepare a solution. For example this solution typically can comprises 15% wt. monomer and 85% wt. acetone. After coating, the solvent is vaporized off. The situation is similar with a process for treating the surfaces of polymers with essentially pure solvent solutions containing low concentrations (e.g. less than 1.0% wt.) of amorphous fluoropolymers (WO 92/10532). Likewise, solutions of fluorine-containing polymers are also involved in a patent for coating expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) with an amorphous copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (EP 0561875). In each of these cases, significant quantities of solvent are released during the coating coalescence process. These solvent emissions are both costly and environmentally undesirable. Moreover, solvent-based wetting systems have the inherent limitation of incompatibility with a broad range of aqueous fluoropolymers, and the concentration of solvent necessary to wet the substrate limits the amount and type of additive that can be coated on that substrate.
Efforts have been made to convert from these solvent based coating systems to aqueous coatings systems. However, the challenge of achieving stability of the wetting package and to achieve fast wetting speed are hard to meet. One relatively common approach is to add a water soluble organic solvent to the aqueous coating solution or latex. U.S. Pat. No. 6,228,477 teaches a means to coat a low surface energy, microporous PTFE substrate with an otherwise non-wetting, aqueous fluoropolymer dispersion through the use of significant percentages of isopropanol (“IPA”). In one such example, the non-wetting, aqueous fluoropolymer dispersion was diluted to 25% dispersion and 75% IPA, applied to a microporous PTFE substrate, and the solvent evaporated off to thereby form a uniform coating of the desired fluoropolymer. This process unfortunately requires the use of large amounts of IPA and creates significant environmental problems. In other examples in this patent, a number of fluoropolymer treatments were shown to be unstable with high concentrations of water soluble alcohol, further limiting this IPA wetting system.
Aqueous microemulsion systems have been developed to circumvent the need for high levels of VOC's in order to wet low surface energy substrates. One such system that does not require the use of IPA or any other VOC's is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,460,872, to Wu et. al. This patent teaches the use of fluorinated surfactants to lower the surface energy and contact angle with microporous PTFE as a means to produce a uniformly coated microporous PTFE substrate. After application of this aqueous dispersion, the fluorinated surfactant and the residual water were then removed by heating.
High costs of manufacturing and potential environmental issues with these prior art materials have highlighted the continuing need for a solution to effectively coat low surface energy substrates without high levels of VOC's or undesirable fluorosurfactants.
The present invention overcomes the limitation of the prior art by providing a robust, stable aqueous delivery system. This invention is capable of wetting low surface energy substrates and thereby can deliver a wide range of organic and inorganic materials to form coatings thereon. The present invention is directed to an aqueous delivery system of a surfactant and a water insoluble organic compound having a functional group containing —OH as a wetting agent. Optionally, one or more materials that permit greater amounts of wetting agent without causing phase separation (i.e., stabilizers) can be added. Added functionality can be incorporated by including one or more additives in the aqueous delivery system. This invention can be used to deliver a range of functional materials to low surface energy materials, including, but not limited to, functionalized or surface active polymers. Also described are low surface energy materials, such as microporous fluoropolymers, coated by the aqueous delivery system. Additionally, the invention includes a coated article including a low surface energy microporous material having a coating on at least a portion of the pore walls of the microporous material, the coating having a measurable amount of surfactant up to 25% by weight based on the total weight of the coated microporous material.
In the present invention, an aqueous solution is produced when at least one surfactant is used to emulsify at least one water insoluble wetting agent. In a further embodiment, this invention is directed to low surface energy substrates, such as microporous polytetrafluoroethylene, coated via such an aqueous solution so as to impart a change in at least one surface characteristic compared to the surface characteristics of the uncoated microporous substrate.
Application to low surface energy substrates relies on good wetting. To achieve good wetting, the surface tension of the aqueous delivery system should to be sufficiently low to penetrate the microporous substrate. For example, a surface tension of less than or equal to about 30 dynes/cm is typically required to penetrate expanded microporous PTFE. Higher surface tension wetting systems may accordingly be suitable for higher energy substrates such as microporous polyethylene or microporous polypropylene. As previously discussed, the prior art teaches that high levels of water soluble wetting agents such as isopropanol can be used to lower γSL in order to enable certain aqueous coating systems to wet a microporous low surface energy PTFE substrate (U.S. Pat. No. 6,676,993 B2).
Suitable wetting agents of the present invention include organic compounds having a functional group containing —OH and mixtures of solvents that exhibit a low water solubility, such as, but not limited to, alcohols and carboxylic acids having five or more carbon atoms in the longest continuous chain. For example, alcohols with C5-C10 linear chains, or carboxylic acids with a chain length of C5-C10 including the carbonyl carbon atom may be utilized as wetting agents. As used herein, low water solubility of solvents in water is meant to denote solvents that have a solubility of less than about five grams per 100 ml of water. For example, pentanols, hexanols, octanols, hexanoic acid, pentanoic acid, octanoic acid, and the like, are within the range of suitable wetting agents of the present invention. Table A illustrates the solubility for two particular organic compounds having a functional group containing OH, those being carboxylic acids and alcohols. As shown in Table A, for these two solvents, those having 5 or more carbon atoms are insoluble, while those with four or fewer carbon atoms are soluble in water.
Apart from the water insoluble organic compounds having a functional group containing —OH, the aqueous delivery system may also incorporate other water insoluble organic compounds, such as, but not limited to, alkanes, etc. Optionally, the wetting agent may also exhibit a low γSL relative to the targeted low surface energy substrate.
The surfactant(s) of this invention can be a single surfactant or a combination of surfactants. Surfactants suitable for use in the invention include those that are able to emulsify the desired wetting agent. For the organic compounds having a functional group containing —OH described above, several classes of anionic surfactants can be used, including, but not limited to, those having a structure of R(EO)nOSO3− or ROSO3− where R can be any organic chain, “O” is oxygen, “S” is sulfur, “EO” is ethylene oxide and n>1. In an alternate embodiment, nonionic surfactants having the structure R(EO)nOH, where n>1, are also suitable for this invention. In at least one exemplary embodiment, nonionic surfactants with hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (“HLB”) values of ten or greater were found most effective to emulsify the wetting agents described above. The concentration of surfactant can be adjusted in order to achieve good emulsification of the desired wetting agent. For example, when 4% by weight of hexanol wetting agent (based on the total aqueous solution weight) was used, a concentration of about 2% of sodium dodecyl ether sulfate was found to be suitable. In an alternate formulation, 6% wt. of an ethoxylated alcohol was able to emulsify 4% wt. hexanol wetting agent.
In some situations, it may be desirable to use surfactants that can be easily removed either during or after final processing. For example, if the final product is to be used in environments that may be sensitive to the chemical substituents of the surfactant, the surfactant may be removed. One example of such a final use is one where a chemical process occurs on or near the final product that might be poisoned by the surfactant should it come in contact with the reactants or products of the chemical process. Another example is a use where the final product is used at temperatures where the surfactant may degrade, releasing compounds that may cause undesirable effects. In applications such as these, it is desirable to use surfactants that can be removed after final product preparation. Such volatile surfactants are known in the art, and include, but are not limited to, acetylenic diols and surfactants containing amine oxide groups. These surfactants can be removed by using any combination of heat and vacuum. The exact conditions required for removal of such volatile surfactants are easily determined using thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA). It is generally desirable to use conditions that will not degrade the substrate of the final composite during the removal process, which usually means keeping the final removal temperature below the decomposition temperature of the substrate. For example, when expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is the substrate, temperatures below 200° C., or at or below 180° C.
In addition to the aqueous delivery system provided by the surfactant and the wetting agent, a stabilizing agent can optionally be added. A stabilizing agent is typically soluble in both the organic compounds having a functional group containing —OH and water, and it allows a greater amount of alcohol to be stabilized in the aqueous system than without the stabilizer. In one embodiment, glycols were found to be effective stabilizers, such as but not limited to dipropylene glycol (“DPG”), dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether, and propylene glycol. A wide range of stabilizer concentrations can be used depending on the amount of additional stability desired. For instance, if a small increase in stability is desired, a small amount of the optional stabilizer should be used. Conversely, higher stabilizer concentrations generally further increase the emulsion stability. Exceptions to these general guidelines do however exist. For example, DPG may be an effective stabilizer when used in concentrations ranging from less than about 1% wt. up to about 10% wt. based on total aqueous emulsion weight for hexanol-based systems.
In another aspect of this invention, additional functional additives can optionally be added to the aqueous delivery system. As used herein, the term “functional additive” is intended to refer to any additional material which renders further functionality to the low surface energy substrate than what otherwise exists in the absence of the functional additive. Suitable functional additives include materials which have suitable stability to be delivered and which are either soluble in the aqueous delivery system (either the water or wetting agent) or dispersible in the aqueous delivery system. In one exemplary embodiment of the invention, if the substrate is a polymer layer that is not naturally oleophobic, it can be rendered oleophobic by incorporating within the aqueous delivery system a functional additive which is an oleophobic material. This unique feature of the invention provides significant advantages over conventional solvent coating means of applying, for example, oleophobic materials. This unique delivery system of the present invention provides spontaneous wetting of the substrate, and even in the case of microporous substrates, such as described below, which often have tortuous porosity, the present invention can be tailored to readily facilitate coating at least a portion of the pore walls of the substrate.
In one embodiment of this invention, suitable low surface energy materials can include microporous substrates, as noted in the previous paragraph. Suitable microporous polymers can include fluoropolymers, e.g. polytetrafluoroethylene or polyvinylidene fluorides, polyolefins, e.g. polyethylene or polypropylene; polyamides; polyesters; polysulfone, poly(ethersulfone) and combinations thereof, polycarbonate, polyurethanes. Coatings applied via the present invention to such microporous substrates may be designed to either coat the surfaces of the microstructure leaving the pores open or it can be designed to effectively fill a substantial portion of the pores. In instances where retention of air permeability or high breathability is desired, the present invention should be designed to preserve the open microporous structure, as filling the micropores may destroy or severely lessen the water-vapor transmitting property of the microporous substrate. Thus, the walls defining the voids in the microporous polymer preferably have only a very thin coating of the oleophobic polymer in such an embodiment. Moreover, to maintain flexibility of the substrate, the coating of the functional material should be sufficiently thin to not impact the flexibility of the substrate when coated.
Common oleophobic functional additive compositions suitable for this invention include oleophobic fluorocarbon compounds. For example, the fluorocarbon can be one that contains perfluoroalkyl groups CF3—(CF2)n—, where n is ≧0. The following compounds or classes of oleophobic materials, while not exhaustive, can be used:
The following polymeric particle solutions, while again not exhaustive, can also be used:
The concentration of the functional material provided by this invention can vary greatly depending on the desired outcome. When an oleophobic fluoropolymer is used as the functional additive material, such as but not limited to, polymers having —(CF2)n—CF3 pendant groups, functional materials of this type can impart very low surface energy values to the polymer and thus impart good oil and water resistance properties. Representative oleophobic polymers can be made from organic monomers having pendant perfluoroalkyl groups. These include fluoroalkyl acrylates and fluoroalkyl methacrylates having terminal perfluoroalkyl groups of the formula:
wherein n is a cardinal number of 1-21, m is a cardinal number of 1-10, and R is H or CH3; fluoroalkyl aryl urethanes, fluoroalkyl allyl urethanes, fluoroalkyl urethane acrylates; fluoroalkyl acrylamides; fluoroalkyl sulfonamide acrylates and the like. When a low surface energy coating is desired, concentrations from about 1% wt. up to about 20% wt. based on total emulsion solids may be effective. When coating microporous substrates, the concentration of the oleophobic functional material preferably is between about 3% wt. up to about 12% wt. based on total emulsion weight.
Alternate embodiments of this invention include other optional functional additive materials. The present invention can be used to deliver particulate functional materials to surfaces, provided that the particulate can be dispersed in the emulsion wetting system. In some instances, it may be advantageous to disperse the particulates in a dispersing agent which can subsequently be dispersed in the emulsion wetting system. Hence when a substrate is coated with the aqueous solution, the functional additive particles contained therein will be deposited onto and/or into substrate and its surfaces in order to effect, for example, a color change in the case of a pigment, or other desirable functional change in the substrate. Carbon particles are of particular interest in applications where a change in an electromagnetic spectral response or electric or thermal conductivity of the substrate is desired. In applications involving particulates, concentrations ranging from about 0.1% wt. up to about 5% wt. based on total emulsion weight are often appropriate.
The optional functional material of the present invention may also be materials that are either soluble in the inventive aqueous delivery system or dispersible in the inventive aqueous delivery system. The list of soluble materials that can be used in conjunction with the present invention include but are not limited to simple salts (e.g., AgNo3, CuSo4), simple compounds, polyacrylic acid, polyacrylamide, melamine, polyvinyl alcohol, salts, and dyes. The list of dispersible materials that can be used in conjunction with the present invention include but are not limited to polyfluoroacrylates, polystyrene, pigments, carbon black, and aluminum oxide. One requirement for these dispersible materials is that the particle size be sufficiently small so that then can physically enter the pores of the microporous substrate to which they are being applied. When the microporous substrate is inherently hydrophobic, such a coating can change the surface characteristic from hydrophobic to hydrophilic.
Other useful permutations of this invention are also encompassed within the breadth of functional materials that can be stable in the present aqueous delivery system and thereby subsequently applied to a range of microporous and non-microporous substrates.
For the purposes of this application the following terms shall be recognized to have the meaning set forth below unless otherwise indicated:
“Air permeable” means that airflow is observed as determined by the Gurley test described below. It will be appreciated by one of skill in the art that an air permeable material will also be moisture vapor permeable.
“Air-impermeable” means that no airflow is observed for at least two minutes as determined by the Gurley test described below.
“Hydrophilic” material denotes a porous material whose pores become filled with liquid water when subjected to liquid water without the application of pressure.
“Microporous” term is used to denote a continuous layer of material comprised of interconnecting pores which create a passageway extending from one surface of the layer to the opposite surface of the layer.
“Oleophobic” means a material that has an oil resistance of 1 or more, as measured by the Oil Repellency Test, below.
Gurley numbers were obtained as follows:
The resistance of samples to air flow was measured by a Gurley densometer (ASTM) D726-58) manufactured by W. & L. E. Gurley & Sons. The results are reported in terms of Gurley Number, which is the time in seconds for 100 cubic centimeters of air to pass through 6.54 cm. sup.2 of a test sample at a pressure drop of 1.215 kN/m2 of water. A material is air-impermeable if no air passage is observed over a 120 second interval.
In these tests, oil rating was measured using the AATCC Test Method 118-1983 when testing film composites. The oil rating of a film composite is the lower of the two ratings obtained when testing the two sides of the composite. The higher the number, the better the oil repellency. A value of greater than 1, preferably 2 or more, more preferably 4 or more, is preferred.
The test is modified as follows when testing laminates of the film composite with a textile. Three drops of the test oil are placed on the textile surface. A glass plate is placed directly on top of the oil drops. After 3 minutes, the reverse side of the laminate is inspected for a change in appearance indicating penetration or staining by the test oil. The oil rating of the laminate corresponds to the highest number oil that does not wet through the laminate or cause visible staining from the reverse side of oil exposure. The higher the number, the better the oil repellency. A value of greater than 1, preferably 2 or more, more preferably 4 or more, and most preferably, 6 or more, is preferred.
This test is performed to determine whether a given solution will wet a microporous substrate. A sheet of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane is placed in an embroidery hoop. One drop of the solution being tested is placed on the ePTFE and is left on the surface for 30 seconds. If the solution wets the membrane, the membrane turns from white to essentially completely clear under the drop of solution because the solution fills the pores of the membrane. The approximate time required for the membrane to clarify from wetting is recorded as a measure of the ease with which the solution wets the membrane. If the membrane has not clarified after 30 seconds, the solution is considered as not being able to wet the membrane and “>30 s” is recorded as the time.
As is known in the art (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,228,477, or AATCC Test Method 118-1983) solutions that wet ePTFE are generally considered to have a surface tension of 30 dynes/cm or less. Thus, this test is a fast and simple way to estimate the surface tension of the solution. In other words, solutions that wet the ePTFE membrane in less than 30 seconds are considered herein to have a surface tension of less than 30 dynes/cm, while those that do not are considered to have a surface tension greater than about 30 dynes/cm.
In order to determine the amount of 1-hexanol needed to wet ePTFE with a non-ionic surfactant, a nonionic surfactant, Iconol DA-6 (BASF, ethoxylated alcohol, HLB 13), was added to de-ionized water to make a 4 weight % solution. 1-Hexanol was added incrementally to the Iconol DA-6 solution. After each addition of 1-hexanol, the stability of the mixture was examined for phase separation.
The ability of this mixture to wet and penetrate a 50 g/m2 ePTFE membrane (0.2 micron pore size, 100 micron thickness, Gurley number of about 25 sec., W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc., Elkton, Md.) was assessed by measuring the time required for a drop to clarify fully the membrane. The data are shown in Table I. Pure 1-hexanol wets ePTFE in 1-2 sec. Surprisingly, a dilute hexanol (1.7%) and surfactant blend wets ePTFE as fast as pure hexanol.
Witcolate ES-2 (30% solids, dodecyl ether sulfate, obtained from Witco Chemicals/Crompton Corporation, Middlebury, Conn.) was used to determine that a level as high as approximately 11% surfactant solids could be used to wet ePTFE (50 g/m2) in combination with 1-hexanol. A mixture of 3.9 g of Witcolate ES-2 and 6.1 g of de-ionized water was prepared. 1-Hexanol was added incrementally to this mixture, and the stability and wetting time for ePTFE was measured as in Example 1. The data are shown in Table II.
In order to determine the upper range of 1-hexanol (approximately 30 weight %) that could be used to wet ePTFE, 1.3 g of Witcolate ES-2 (30% solids, dodecyl ether sulfate, obtained from Witco Chemicals/Crompton Corporation, Middlebury, Conn.) was added to 8.7 g of de-ionized water. 1-Hexanol was added incrementally to this mixture, and the stability and wetting time for ePTFE was measured as in Example 1. The data are shown in Table III.
In addition to nonionic and anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants were determined to be useful in combination with 1-hexanol to wet quickly ePTFE, as follows. A dodecyldimethylethyl quaternary ammonium bromide, DAB, (0.3 g) was added to 9.7 g of de-ionized water. 1-Hexanol was added incrementally to this mixture, and the stability and wetting time for ePTFE was measured as in Example 1. The data are shown in Table IV.
To determine that compounds soluble in both the water-insoluble alcohol and water such as dipropylene glycol (DPG) can be used to increase the stability of the wetting mixture, a mixture (4 weight %) of a nonionic ethoxylated alcohol surfactant (Iconol TDA-9 from BASF) was prepared. Without DPG, 1-hexanol would cause phase separation at 2.5% 1-hexanol. The addition of 4 weight % DPG increased the stability and the ability to wet ePTFE (50 g/m2). The data are shown in Table V
Other water-insoluble alcohols were also examined. Pure 1-octanol clarifies ePTFE (50 g/m2) in 5 seconds. A dilute mixture of 1-octanol with Witcolate ES-2 (30% solids, dodecyl ether sulfate, obtained from Witco Chemicals/Crompton Corporation, Middlebury, Conn.) can wet ePTFE as fast as pure octanol. A 13 weight percent (4 weight % solids) Witcolate ES-2 solution was prepared. 1-Octanol was added incrementally to this mixture. The stability and wetting time for ePTFE was measured as in Example 1. The data are shown in Table VI.
The ability of surfactant and hexanol mixtures to wet and coat ePTFE with oleophobic materials was examined. Mixtures of 13 weight percent (4 weight percent solids) Witcolate ES-2 (30% solids, dodecyl ether sulfate, obtained from Witco Chemicals/Crompton Corporation, Middlebury, Conn.) and approximately 6 weight percent 1-hexanol were prepared with various fluoroacrylate polymers (9 weight percent solids). The following fluoropolymers were used: AG415 and AG4210 (Asahi Glass Company), Zonyl 7040 (DuPont), and TG-532 (Daikan). These mixtures were spread on one surface of an expanded PTFE membrane (about 20 g/m2, thickness of about 40 micron, and Gurley number of about 15 sec.) until the membrane was clarified. The coated ePTFE was placed in a solvent oven at 190° C. for 2.5 min. The time for a drop of these coating mixtures to clarify ePTFE (50 g/m2) was measured. The stability of the mixture was examined. Oil ratings on the coated and uncoated side of the ePTFE (20 g/m2) were measured. Additionally, the air permeability was determined by measuring the time for 100 cm3 of air to flow through the coated membrane (Gurley). The data show that a range of fluoropolymers can be used to coat ePTFE (Table VII). The uncoated ePTFE has a Gurley of 15.7 sec. The oil rating of ePTFE (uncoated) was 1.
Multiple functional additives were used to coat an expanded PTFE membrane (20 g/m2, W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc.). A mixture of 1.3 g of Witcolate ES-2 (30% solids, dodecyl ether sulfate, obtained from Witco Chemicals/Crompton Corporation, Middlebury, Conn.), 0.6 g of 1-hexanol, 6.4 g of de-ionized water, 1.5 g of AG8025 (Asahi Glass Company), 0.2 g of melamine resin (Aerotex 3730 from Cytec), and 0.02 g of catalyst (zinc nitrate) was prepared. This mixture wetted the expanded PTFE immediately. The coated ePTFE was placed in a solvent oven at 190° C. for 3 min. The air permeability of the cured sample was measured (Gurley of 48.7 sec for 100 cm3). The sample was also determined to be oleophobic (oil rating of 8 on the coated side and 6 on the uncoated side).
In this example, a 5 mil thick, high molecular weight microporous polyethylene (Dewal Corporation) was rendered oleophobic and air permeable using surfactant and hexanol blends with fluoropolymers in accordance with the present invention. Specifically, a mixture of 1.3 g of Witcolate ES-2 (30% solids, dodecyl ether sulfate, obtained from Witco Chemicals/Crompton Corporation, Middlebury, Conn.), 0.6 g 1-hexanol, 5.1 g de-ionized water, and 3.0 g of AG8025 (Asahi Glass Company) was prepared. This mixture was observed to wet the microporous polyethylene membrane. The coated membrane was heated at 190° C. for 2 min. The oleophobicity of the coated and uncoated sides was measured and was determined to be an oil rating of 7 for each side. A sample of the uncoated precursor polyethylene membrane had an oil rating of less than 1. The air permeability was also measured for the coated sample and the uncoated precursor. The coated sample had a Gurley (100 cm3) measurement of 1.5 sec. The uncoated precursor polyethylene microporous membrane had a Gurley (100 cm3) of 0.3 sec.
Two different organic compounds having a functional group containing —OH were used in this example: (1) carboxylic acids having the formula, CnH2n+1COOH, and (2) alcohols with the formula, CnH2n+1OH. Details are shown in Table VIII. In this table, the solid weight percent of surfactant is calculated by the concentration of the surfactant in the as-received solution times the weight percent of the surfactant solution used in the mix. For example, in Example 10 below, 0.65 g Barlox 10s was added to 9.24 g water and 0.16 g hexanoic acid. Therefore the wetting agent concentration is 0.16/(0.65+9.24+0.16)*100=1.6%, and the surfactant concentration is 0.65/(0.65+9.24+0.16) times the percent solids in Barlox 10s, which is 30%, yielding 0.019 or 1.9% solids.
The wetting agent shown was added incrementally to each of the mixtures and the stability of the solution and wetting time for ePTFE was measured as in Example 1. As before, stability was characterized by whether there was a single, homogenous solution phase, i.e., one layer, visible to the naked eye (1-phase), or whether there were two phases (or layers) to the solution as visible by the naked eye.
The ePTFE used in these examples was made generally according to the teachings of Branca et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,405 such that the membrane had a average mass of 4.4 g/m2, a Gurley of 3.2 seconds, and a mean flow pore size of 0.21 microns. Surfactants used in these examples include Barlox 10s (Lonza, Inc., Allendale, N.J.), Zonyl 1033D (E. I. DuPont de Nemours, Inc., Wilmington, Del.), FMB AO-8 (Lonza, Inc., Allendale, N.J.), Schercamox DML (The Lubrizol Corp., Wickliffe, Ohio), Barlox 12i (Lonza, Inc., Allendale, N.J.) and Barlox 12 (Lonza, Inc., Allendale, N.J.). In all examples shown in Table VIII, the ePTFE substrate clarified, indicating good wetting occurred within the time indicated in the Table.
Barlox 12, the surfactant used in Examples 56-69, is an example of a volatile surfactant based upon an amine oxide.
Using the same procedure outlined in Examples 10-68, solutions were prepared as shown in Table IX. In these examples, the same surfactants used in the Examples 10-68 were used, but no wetting agent was present. In all cases, the solutions did not wet the ePTFE, giving no clarification of the membrane. Instead, the solution was left on top of the membrane within the 30 s time frame of the experiment (see, e.g., the Wetting Test described herein).
Examples 10-68 and these comparative examples surprisingly demonstrate that the presence of the wetting agent with the surfactant is required to achieve wetting of ePTFE.
In this series of comparative examples, a range of organic compounds that do not have an —OH functional group were substituted for the organic compound having a functional group containing —OH (as shown in Table IX).
In these comparative examples, Rhodaplex ES2/K (30% solids, dodecyl ether sulfate, obtained from Rhodia (Cranbury, N.J.) was used. The same procedure was used as described in the previous examples. The organic compounds shown were added incrementally to each of these mixtures, and the stability of the solution and wetting time for ePTFE was measured as described in Example 1. In this example, stability is characterized by whether there was a single, homogenous solution phase visible to the naked eye (1-phase), or whether there were two phases (or layers) to the solution as visible by the naked eye. The data are shown in Table X. The mixtures using the solvents in C17-C40 do not promote wetting of ePTFE regardless of surfactant or wetting agent concentration, indicating the surprising result that only organic compounds having an functional group containing —OH are effective in the instant invention.
In this set of comparative examples, the critical nature of the solution concentration is illustrated. It is not sufficient to merely have both the wetting agent and surfactant present; they must be present in appropriate concentrations in the solution to lower the surface tension to below about 30 dynes/cm in order to wet ePTFE. The exact concentrations required to lower the surface tension to below about 30 will vary for each surfactant and wetting agent mixture. However, the critical concentrations can easily and quickly be determined for any given combination of surfactant and wetting agent through the use of the wetting test described herein.
The tests in C41-C43 were performed using the same procedures as described in Examples 10-68 except that the concentrations of the surfactant and wetting agent were adjusted so that the samples did not wet, i.e., the wetting test gave times greater than 30 s. Table XI shows that for these particular surfactant/wetting agent combinations, wetting of ePTFE did not occur. Thus, these results indicate that for the levels of surfactant and wetting agent in these examples, the liquid surface tension is greater than about 30 dynes/cm.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/138,876 to Freese filed on May 25, 2005 entitled Aqueous Delivery System for Low Surface Energy Structures.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11138876 | May 2005 | US |
| Child | 13833143 | US |
