Aqueous Solution for Use as Medium for the Specific Binding Reaction of a Binding Pair

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080064116
  • Publication Number
    20080064116
  • Date Filed
    February 26, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Published
    March 13, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
The present invention refers to an aqueous solution for use as medium for the specific binding reaction of a binding pair, wherein a first binding member recognises its complementary second binding member. The solution contains a) a buffer to control pH; b) a compound A selected from a compound defined by the general formula I R1—[[CR2R3]p—O]q—R4, wherein R1 I is hydrogen or hydroxy group, R2 for each unit independently is hydrogen or hydroxy group, R3 is hydrogen, methyl group, or ethyl group, R4 is hydrogen or alkyl group, p is an integer of from 2 to 10 and q is an integer of from 1 to 100, with the proviso that the compound at least carries two hydroxy groups; a polyol; or saccharide; and c) a non-ionic detergent.
Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows the amount of detector antibody C6 bound to CRP in a sandwich assay as absorbance at 450 nm plotted against the concentration of CRP [ng/ml]. The binding reaction of detector antibody C6 to the protein CRP was performed as outlined under Example 1 under standard conditions and by using sample buffers according to the present invention, respectively (see table 1). Sample buffers I to III according to the solution of the present invention reduce the influence of the matrix effects very well. Sample buffer I shows the best sensitivity. The low sensitivity of the reference buffer is caused by a strong matrix effect.



FIG. 2 shows the influence of two different buffers on high background signals caused by unspecific binding of the polyclonal detector antibody P2 which binds unspecific to the capture antibody P3 (according to Example 2). In this experiment no analyte was present. Sample buffer I decreases significantly the unspecific binding compared to the high background signals with reference example buffer II.





EXAMPLES
Example 1
Reduction of Matrix Effects

100 μl diluted capture antibody C2 (final concentration 1 μg/ml in PBS-Buffer) was added to each well of a microtiter plate (C8 StarWell Module, NUNC) and the plate was covered with a plate sealer. The capture antibody is directed against CRP (c-reactive protein). Then the plate was incubated for 5 hours at room temperature. The plate sealer was removed and the plate was washed 4 times with 300 μl washing buffer (10 mM Phosphate, 350 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween, pH 7.4) per well. Then 200 μl of blocking solution (PBS-Buffer pH 7.4, 1% BSA) was added to each well. After covering with a plate sealer the plate was incubated overnight at 4° C. The analyte CRP (c-reactive protein) was diluted in rabbit serum (0-5 ng/ml) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The biotin-labelled detector antibody C6 (directed against CRP) was diluted in different sample buffers and reference example buffers (see table 1). The final concentration was 4 μg/ml in each preparation. The CRP-containing rabbit serum standards were diluted 1:2 with detector antibody containing sample buffers. The preparations were incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The plate sealer was removed and the plate was washed 4 times with 300 μl washing buffer. Oddments of washing buffer were completely removed by taping the plate dry. 100 μl of the CRP-preparations were added to the wells. The plate was covered with a plate sealer and incubated for 4 h at room temperature under gentle shaking. After that the plate was washed again. 100 μl of diluted NeutrAvidin™-Horseradish peroxidase conjugated (final concentration 0.05 μg/ml in PBS-Buffer) was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 1 h at room temperature under gentle shaking. Then the plate was washed again. Equal volumes of the two solutions of ImmunoPure®TMB Substrat were mixed and 100 μl were added immediately to each well. The plate was incubated at room temperature until the desired colour developed. The colour changed from clear to brilliant blue. In a final step the reaction was stopped by adding 150 μl 2 M H2SO4 to each well and the absorbance was read out at 450 nm with an ELISA plate reader (Molecular devices). The influence of different buffers on matrix effects are plotted in FIG. 1. Table 1 shows the results of the test. In table 1 the reduction of non-specific binding, low-affinity binding and matrix effects is indicated in the column “result” with “+”. The number of “+” is indicating the amount of reduction of non-specific binding, low-affinity binding and matrix effects compared to the reference example buffer (“−”). FIG. 1 shows the amount of detector antibody C6 bound to CRP as absorbance at 450 nm plotted against the concentration of CRP [ng/ml]. Sample buffer I shows the best sensitivity. The low sensitivity of the reference buffer is caused by a strong matrix effect.


Example 2
Reduction of an Unspecific Binding of a Polyclonal Detector Antibody

For the next assay 250 μl diluted capture antibody P3 (polyclonal rabbit-anti-protease, own preparation, final concentration 1 g/ml in PBS-Buffer) was added to each well of a microtiter plate (C8 StarWell Module, NUNC) and the plate was covered with a plate sealer. The plate was incubated for 4 hours at room temperature. After that the plate sealer was removed and the plate was washed 4 times with 300 μl washing buffer (10 mM Phosphate, 350 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween®, pH 7.4) per well. Then 200 μl of blocking solution (PBS-Buffer pH 7.4, 1% BSA) was added to each well. The plate was covered again with a plate sealer and incubated overnight at 4° C. The biotin-labelled polyclonal detector antibody P2 (polyclonal rabbit-anti-protease, own preparation) was diluted in reference example buffer II or in sample buffer I (see table 1) respectively (final concentration 10 μg/ml in each preparation) and added to the wells (250 μl per well; fivefold replicates). The plate was incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The plate sealer was removed and the plate was washed 4 times with 300 μl washing buffer. Oddments of washing buffer were completely removed by taping the plate dry. 250 μl of diluted NeutrAvidin™-Horseradish peroxidase conjugated (final concentration 0.5 μg/ml in PBS-Buffer) was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 1 h at room temperature under gentle shaking. Then the plate was washed again. Equal volumes of the two solutions of ImmunoPure®TMB Substrat were mixed and 100 μl were added immediately to each well. The plate was Incubated at room temperature until the desired colour develops. The colour changes from clear to brilliant blue. In a final step the reaction was stopped by adding 150 μl 2 M H2SO4 to each well and the absorbance was read out at 450 nm with an ELISA plate reader (Molecular devices). The influence of the two different buffers on high background signals caused by unspecific binding of the polyclonal detector antibody P2 which binds unspecifically to the capture antibody P3 is plotted in FIG. 2. FIG. 2 shows the reduction of background signals due to the use of sample buffer I according to the present invention. In this experiment no analyte was used. Further, as antibody a polyclonal serum was used. A polyclonal serum comprises many different antibodies directed against a target protein. Many antibodies will bind with low or lower affinity, while some antibodies will bind with mid-range affinity and one or only a few antibodies will bind with high affinity. The use of the buffer according to the invention prevents the low-affinity binding and at least reduces the mid-range affinity binding of the respective antibodies as shown in FIG. 2. As a result, once an analyte will be added in such an assay the signal-to noise-ratio will be improved due to the properties of the aqueous solution according to the present invention.









TABLE 1







The table shows the results of the test according to Example 1: Result (=Reduction of non-specific, low-affinity


binding and matrix effects)















Compound A
Non-ionic detergent





solution
Buffer/pH
[concentration]
[concentration]
NaCl
BSA
Result





reference example
PBS pH 7.4


150 mM
1%



(state of art)


sample buffer I
Tris pH 7.4
5% ethylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20
300 mM
1%
++++


sample buffer II
Tris pH 7.4
0.5% ethylene glycol
0.1 Tween ®20
150 mM
1%
+


sample buffer III
PBS pH 7.4
3% glycerol
0.15 Triton × 100
200 mM
1%
++


sample buffer IV
Tris pH 7.4
5% glycerol
0.25 Triton × 100
300 mM
1%
++++


sample buffer V
PBS pH 7.4
3% glycerol
0.15 Triton × 100
600 mM
1%
+++


reference example
PBS pH 7.4

0.05 Tween ®20
150 mM
1%
−/+


II (state of art)


sample buffer VI
Tris pH 7.4
5% ethylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20


+++


sample buffer VII
Tris pH 7.4
5% polyethylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20


+++


sample buffer VIII
Tris pH 7.4
5% polypropylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20


+++


sample buffer IX
Tris pH 7.4
5% polyethylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20
300 mM

++++


sample buffer X
Tris pH 7.4
5% polypropylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20
300 mM

++++


sample buffer XI
Tris pH 7.4
5% polyethylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20
300 mM
1%
++++


sample buffer XII
Tris pH 7.4
5% polypropylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20
300 mM
1%
++++


sample buffer XIII
Tris pH 7.4
5% propylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20


+++


sample buffer XIV
Tris pH 7.4
5% propylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20
300 mM

++++


sample buffer XV
Tris pH 7.4
5% propylene glycol
0.25 Tween ®20
300 mM
1%
++++


sample buffer XVI
PBS pH 7.4
5% ethylene glycol
0.25 Triton × 100


+++


sample buffer XVII
PBS pH 7.4
5% ethylene glycol
0.25 Triton × 100
300 mM

++++


sample buffer XVIII
PBS pH 7.4
5% ethylene glycol
0.25 Triton × 100
300 mM
1%
++++


sample buffer XIX
PBS pH 7.4
5% glycerol
0.25 Triton × 100


+


sample buffer XX
PBS pH 7.4
5% glycerol
0.25 Triton × 100
300 mM

+++


sample buffer XXI
PBS pH 7.4
5% glycerol
0.25 Triton × 100
300 mM
1%
+++


sample buffer XXII
PBS pH 7.4
5% trehalose
0.25 Triton × 100


+


sample buffer XXIII
PBS pH 7.4
5% trehalose
0.25 Triton × 100
300 mM

++


sample buffer XXIV
PBS pH 7.4
5% trehalose
0.25 Triton × 100
300 mM
1%
++








Claims
  • 1.-27. (canceled)
  • 28. A method for reducing unspecific binding and/or cross-reactivity and/or disturbing effects of matrices during a specific binding reaction of a binding pair, the method comprising conducting said binding reaction in an aqueous solution for the specific binding reaction, wherein a first binding member of said binding pair recognises its complementary second binding member, said solution comprising a) a buffer to control pH;b) a compound A selected from the group consisting of: a compound defined by the general formula I R1—[[CR2R3]p—O]q—R4, wherein R1 is hydrogen or hydroxy group, R2 for each unit independently is hydrogen or hydroxy group, R3 is hydrogen, methyl group, ethyl group, R4 is hydrogen or alkyl group, p is an integer of from 2 to 10 and q is an integer of from 1 to 100, with the proviso that the compound at least carries two hydroxy groups; a polyol; or a saccharide; andc) a non-ionic detergent,thereby reducing unspecific binding and/or cross-reactivity and/or disturbing effects of matrices.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein said aqueous solution further comprises a protein in an amount effective to immunologically block non-specific antibody binding.
  • 30. The method of claim 29, wherein the protein is selected from the group consisting of bovine serum albumin, ovalbumin, casein, and fetal bovine serum.
  • 31. The method of claim 29, wherein the concentration of the protein is in the range of 0.1 to 2% w/v.
  • 32. The method of claim 28, wherein the solution comprises a salt selected from the group consisting of NaCl, KCl, and NH4Cl.
  • 33. The method of claim 28, wherein the solution has an ionic strength of 100 mM to 1.5 M.
  • 34. The method of claim 28, wherein the buffer is selected from the group consisting of Tris (Tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane, Pipes (Piperazine-1,4-bis-2-ethane sulfonic acid), Mes (4-Morpholino ethane sulfonic acid), Hepes (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine-ethane sulfonic acid), and phosphate buffer.
  • 35. The method of claim 28, wherein the compound A is selected from the group consisting of polyalkylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, ethylene glycol, monosaccharides, disaccharides, trisaccharides, saccharose, mannose, trehalose, polyol, glycerol and mixtures thereof.
  • 36. The method of claim 28, wherein the concentration of the compound A is in the range of 0.5 to 25% v/v.
  • 37. The method of claim 28, wherein the non-ionic detergent is a compound of the general formula selected from the group consisting of: a) a substituted phenyl residue having substituents R1 and R2 (R1-Ph-R2), wherein R1 is C1-C9 a alkyl group, and R2 is a —O—[CH2—CH2—O]a—H group, wherein “a” is an integer of 5 to 40, wherein R2 in respect to R1 is in para, meta or ortho position, and
  • 38. The method of claim 28, wherein the non-ionic detergent is selected from the group consisting of Dodecylpoly(ethyleneglycolether)m, wherein m is an integer of 5 to 40; 1-O-n-Octyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (n-Octylglucoside); Alkylphenolpoly(ethylene-glycolether)m, wherein m is an integer of 5 to 40; Alkylphenolpoly(ethylene-glycolether)m, wherein m=11 (Nonidet Page); 1-O-n-Dodecyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1-4)alpha-D-glucopyranoside; Dodecylpoly-(ethyleneglycolether)m, wherein m is an integer of 5 to 40; Dodecylpoly-(ethyleneglycolether)m, wherein m=23 (Brij35®); Poly(oxyethylene)(20)-sorbitane mono fatty acid ester; Poly(oxyethylene)(20)-sorbitane monooleate (Tween®80); Poly(oxyethylene) (20)-sorbitane monolaurate (Tween®20); Poly(oxyethylene)(20)-sorbitane monopalmitate (Tween®40); Poly(oxyethylene)(20)-sorbitane monostearate); Octylphenolpoly(ethylene-glycolether)m, wherein m is an integer of 5 to 40; and Octylphenolpoly(ethylene-glycolether)m, wherein m=10 (Triton®X 100).
  • 39. The method of claim 28, wherein the concentration of the non-ionic detergent is in the range of 0.1 to 1.0% v/v.
  • 40. The method of claim 28, wherein the ratio of the non-ionic detergent to the compound A is from 1:15 to 1:25.
  • 41. The method of claim 28, wherein the aqueous solution does not contain dithiothreitol.
  • 42. The method of claim 28, wherein the pH is adjusted in the range of 5.6 to 9.6.
  • 43. The method of claim 28, wherein the aqueous solution has the capability of reducing unspecific binding, cross-reactivity, and disturbing effects of the matrices.
  • 44. The method of claim 28, wherein the aqueous solution has the capability of preventing the low-affinity binding with KD values of up to 10−7 M.
  • 45. The method of claim 28, wherein the aqueous solution has the capability of preventing the low-affinity binding with KD values of up to 10−7 M and reducing the mid-range affinity binding with KD values in the range of between 10−7 M and 10−8 M by at least 90%.
  • 46. The method of claim 28, wherein the aqueous solution has the capability of preventing the low-affinity binding with KD values of up to 10−7 M and reducing the mid-range affinity binding with KD values in the range of between 10−7 and 10−9 by at least 90%.
  • 47. The method of claim 28, wherein the aqueous solution has the capability to increase the binding activity or affinity of antibodies.
  • 48. The method of claim 28, wherein said binding pair is antibody-antigen binding pair.
  • 49. The method of claim 28, wherein said binding pair is receptor-ligand binding pair.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP04/50209 2/26/2004 WO 00 6/15/2007