Patent Grant
12097522
Most rotating, pop-up irrigation sprinklers include a mechanism for determining which angles it rotates within during irrigation, known as a sprinkler's “watering arc.” For example, a sprinkler may be located adjacent to a sidewalk and therefore it may be desirable to prevent the sprinkler's nozzle from rotating towards the sidewalk and instead be limited to rotating only towards areas of grass.
One concern with watering arc mechanisms is that a vandal will forcefully rotate a sprinkler's riser while it is irrigating. For example, a child may rotate the sprinkler's riser to spray their friends.
In some sprinkler models, this forced rotation will either change the size/position of the watering arc or may further damage the internal transmission mechanisms responsible for the rotation and watering arc settings. For example, forced rotation may result in broken drive gears or broken trip tabs in the trip mechanism causing a permanent stall, increase or decrease of the watering arc angle, or rotation of the watering arc to a different location.
Other sprinkler models include a “memory arc” feature that allows a sprinkler's riser to be hand-rotated without changing the adjustment of its watering arc settings and without otherwise causing damage to the sprinkler's transmission. Examples of such mechanisms can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,383,600; 10,464,083; and U.S. Pub. No. 2019/0283051; all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. These mechanisms typically release their connection from various transmission components to prevent damage or adjustment changes.
Commercial sprinklers often include memory arc mechanisms since they are intended for public locations, such as parks and sports fields, that are most prone to such unintended, manual sprinkler rotation. However, these commercial sprinklers are often more expensive and sometimes less durable than sprinklers without such a feature due to the complexity of their transmissions.
Residential sprinkler models, on the other hand, typically do not have vandal resistant memory arc mechanisms since consumers are typically less inclined to pay the additional cost of this feature that comes with the more complex sprinkler transmission. Additionally, it is thought to be less likely that a non-resident/vandal will attempt to forcefully rotate the sprinkler during operation at a residential location.
In this respect, the belief in the irrigation industry has been that this sprinkler “vandalism” occurs only when sprinkler risers are popped up and rotating during irrigation. When irrigation has stopped and the sprinkler risers have popped down, there would otherwise be little incentive to forcefully rotate the sprinkler riser (e.g., there would be no water spraying from the sprinkler for the vandal to “spray around”).
However, the inventors have conducted extensive research, testing, and field return analysis, on this issue and have found that most field problems with conventional, non-memory arc rotors, are caused by rotation of the sprinkler riser in the unpressurised, popped-down condition. The inadvertent popped-down rotation of the nozzle base can have numerous causes. For example, a rotating wheel of a lawn mower or shoe contact from a pedestrian may inadvertently cause the lowered sprinkler riser to rotate. Hence, despite the lack of intentional vandalism, other causes of damage or watering arc changes are present, particularly with a residential sprinkler without a memory arc mechanism.
In this respect, while commercial rotating sprinklers with a memory arc feature are typically protected against forced rotation when popped up and popped down, the inventors have discovered that residential rotors without the feature are not and tend to be the subject of damage from inadvertent popped-down rotation. The inventors believe that, until now, inadvertent popped-down rotation has not been recognized as the root cause for a majority of damage to sprinklers without a memory arc feature and therefore there is an unmet need to address this damage without the added cost of a complex memory arc mechanism.
The present invention is generally directed to a mechanism configured to resist or prevent rotation of portions of an irrigation sprinkler riser when in its lowered or popped-down position. Hence, when a pedestrian walks over a lowered sprinkler or a lawn mower rolls over a sprinkler, for example, the riser will remain fixed in its rotational orientation relative to its outer body and surroundings. By resisting or preventing this rotation, this rotational locking mechanism prevents damage to the internal transmission, gears, and arc trip mechanisms of the sprinkler, as well as prevents the watering arc from being accidentally adjusted.
In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to an interface between two sprinkler surface that normally rotate relative to each other. The surfaces are spaced apart from each other such that they have little or no contact with each other, thereby allowing portions of the sprinkler to rotate as part of normal operation. However, one or more of the surfaces also include friction generating features, such as material that tends to “grab” opposing surfaces of the interface or elevated bumps, ridges, or similar raised elements. Hence, as downward force is applied to the sprinkler (e.g., a person or vehicle on top of the sprinkler), the friction generating features of the interface allow the two surfaces to engage each other and prevent the sprinkler riser or turret from rotating, thereby preventing damage or improper adjustment to components of the sprinkler.
These and other aspects, features and advantages of which embodiments of the invention are capable of will be apparent and elucidated from the following description of embodiments of the present invention, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. The terminology used in the detailed description of the embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings is not intended to be limiting of the invention. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements. While different embodiments are described, features of each embodiment can be used interchangeably with other described embodiments. In other words, any of the features of each of the embodiments can be mixed and matched with each other, and embodiments should not necessarily be rigidly interpreted to only include the features shown or described.
The present invention is generally directed to a mechanism configured to resist or prevent rotation of portions of an irrigation sprinkler riser when in its lowered or popped-down position. Hence, when a pedestrian walks over a lowered sprinkler or a lawn mower rolls over a sprinkler, for example, the riser will remain fixed in its rotational orientation relative to its outer body and surroundings. By resisting or preventing this rotation, this rotational locking mechanism prevents damage to the internal transmission, gears, and arc trip mechanisms of the sprinkler, as well as prevents the watering arc from being accidentally adjusted.
As best seen in
As previously discussed, the inventors have discovered that a significant portion of damage and accidental arc adjustments are the result of rotating the riser 108 (more specifically the turret 114) when the sprinkler 100 is in its lowered, popped-down position (
The present invention is directed to a brake mechanism that engages only when the riser 108 is in its popped down position, and/or when further downward force is applied. Put another way, the riser 108 is prevented from rotating at least when downward force is placed on the top sprinkler cap 106 but may also be prevented without such additional force when in the popped-down position. For example, the mechanism may only lock rotation when a pedestrian or vehicle moves over the sprinkler 100 or may lock rotation as soon as the riser 108 moves to its lowered position.
In one embodiment, the rotation locking mechanism is directed to raised or elevated features that extend from one sprinkler surface and engage a second sprinkler surface when the riser 108 is in its lowered position and/or when downward force is applied to the sprinkler cap 106.
In one example seen in
The riser seal 116 is typically positioned near a top of the lower sprinkler body 102 and has a circular shape configured to engage against or contact the outer surface of the riser 108 (the turret 114 and the lower riser portion 112). In this respect, the riser seal 116 helps seal the gap between the lower sprinkler body 102 and the riser 108 to keep dirt, debris, and other elements out, while also keeping pressurized water within the sprinkler 100. The riser seal 116 may be composed of a flexible material (e.g., 80 Shore durometer), such as rubber, silicone, thermoplastic elastomer, or similar polymer materials. Typically, a base cap 104 is screwed to a top of the sprinkler body 102 to help maintain the position of the riser seal 116.
The lower turret cover 118, which can also be seen in
When the riser 108 is in its raised, popped-up position, the ridge 118A and raised elements 118B are free from direct contact with any other components. When the riser 108 is in its lowered, popped-down position, the raised elements 118B (and possibly the lower surface of the ridge 118A) contact and engage the top surface of the riser seal 116. As rotational force is applied to the riser 108 (e.g., by a foot or wheel), the raised elements 118B help resist this rotational force. The raised elements 118B may particularly resist rotation when they are somewhat resilient and the riser seal 108 is at least somewhat flexible, allowing the raised elements 118B to push into the surface of the riser seal 116. Downward force on the sprinkler 100 may further engage the raised elements 118B with the riser seal 116.
Alternately, the raised elements 118B may be located on the top surface of the riser seal 116 so that they engage the bottom surface of the ridge 118A. While the lower turret cover 118 is likely to be composed of a rigid material, at least portions of the lower ridge 118A may be composed of flexible material or layer to help with engagement of the raised elements 118B (e.g., a washer).
The raised elements 118B can have a variety of different shapes. Generally, a relatively low height allows the elements 118B to bite into the riser seal 116 without causing damage. For example,
The interface 120 between the riser seal 116 and the turret cover 118 is merely an example. Such an interface can be created between any two components of the riser 108 and the lower base assembly 107. Almost any two components can be used so long as they can come into contact with each other when the sprinkler is in the lowered position. In one specific example, an outer, lower surface 118D of the lower turret cover 118 can be configured to contact an upper surface 104A of the base cap 104, as seen in
It may further be possible to create a similar locking mechanism between two components of the riser 108. For example,
Similar friction-generating interfaces between a lower surface of the turret 114 and with an upper surface of the lower riser portion 112 can occur in locations within the riser 108, such as with different structural components and even with portions of the transmission. Additionally, a sprinkler can include friction-generating interfaces at two or three different interfaces to achieve a better rotational stop or braking system.
In one example, the lower turret cover 118 (or other component with raised elements) can be provided as a kit, allowing a user to upgrade an existing sprinkler 100. Hence, one aspect of the invention is directed to a method of upgrading an existing sprinkler 100 by replacing an existing sprinkler component with a new component that includes raised elements, as discussed in this specification.
In one embodiment, an O-ring can be used at any of the previously described interfaces. This O-ring can be used in addition to the previously described features (e.g., the ridge 118A and raised elements 118B) or can be used in place of such elements (e.g., in place of the ridge 118A). In that respect, the O-ring may be composed of a flexible material that creates friction between contacting components (e.g., silicone, rubber, or polymer) and can include a plurality of raised elements 118A or other textured features to further enhance friction. Such an O-ring may be included with a sprinkler or can be provided as an upgrade kit.
In another embodiment, the outer surface of the riser 108 and the inner surface of the sprinkler base assembly 107 may include mating features that engage with each other when the riser 108 moves to its lowered position. For example, either of these surfaces may include vertical channels that mate with vertical ridges, preventing rotational movement until the riser 108 is raised.
In another embodiment, the sprinkler 100 may include an alternate mechanism for preventing rotation via a switch that selectively locks rotation of the sprinkler 100 when stepped on or rolled on by a wheel. For example, the cap 106 or a switch mechanism under the cap 106 may be configured to have both a raised position and a depressed position. A spring or other element can bias the cap 106 to its raised position. The cap 106 can be connected to a locking member that, when moved downward, engages a non-rotational component of the sprinkler 100 (e.g., a component of the lower riser portion 112 or the lower sprinkler base 107). Hence, the rotational lock only engages when the cap 106 is affirmatively depressed downward.
Although the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments and applications, one of ordinary skill in the art, in light of this teaching, can generate additional embodiments and modifications without departing from the spirit of or exceeding the scope of the claimed invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the drawings and descriptions herein are proffered by way of example to facilitate comprehension of the invention and should not be construed to limit the scope thereof.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3724757 | Hunter | Apr 1973 | A |
| 4986474 | Schisler | Jan 1991 | A |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220339645 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |
