Patent Grant
8676617
The subject matter of this patent applications relates to computer software architecture, and more particularly to the architecture of application software for self-service procurement.
Enterprise software systems are generally large and complex. Such systems can require many different components, distributed across many different hardware platforms, possibly in several different geographical locations. Thus, the architecture of a large software application, i.e., what its components are and how they fit together, is an important aspect of its design for a successful implementation.
This specification presents a software architecture design for a software application implementing self-service procurement.
The invention can be implemented as methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer program products, for implementing a software architecture design for a software application implementing self-service procurement used to procure goods and services “ad hoc” by requests from within an organization. The application is structured as multiple process components interacting with each other through service interfaces, and multiple service interface operations, each being implemented for a respective process component. The process components include an Accounting process component, an Internal Request Processing process component, a Purchase Request Processing process component, a Purchase Order Processing process component, a Goods and Service Acknowledgement process component, a Supplier Invoice Processing process component, a Payment Processing process component, an RFQ Processing process component, and a Due Item Processing process component.
The invention can further be implemented as methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer program products, implementing a software architecture design for a software application that is adapted to interact with external software systems through the service operations described in reference to external process components, or a subcombination of them.
The subject matter described in this specification can be implemented to realize one or more of the following advantages. Effective use is made of process components as units of software reuse, to provide a design that can be implemented reliably in a cost effective way. Effective use is made of deployment units, each of which is deployable on a separate computer hardware platform independent of every other deployment unit, to provide a scalable design. Service interfaces of the process components define a pair-wise interaction between pairs of process components that are in different deployment units in a scalable way.
Details of one or more implementations of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and in the description below. Further features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
As shown in
The Financial Accounting deployment unit 102 contains an Accounting process component 103 that records all relevant business transactions. The Requisitioning deployment unit 104 includes an Internal Request Processing process component 135 to process internal request.
The Purchasing deployment unit 106 includes three process components: a Purchase Request Processing process component 128, a Purchase Order Processing process component 130, and a Goods and Service Acknowledgement process component 132.
The Purchase Request Processing process component 128 provides a request or instruction to the purchasing department to purchase specified goods or services in specified quantities within a specified time.
The Purchase Order Processing process component 130 includes a purchase order business object and a purchase order confirmation business object. The purchase order business object is a request from a purchaser to an external supplier to deliver a specified quantity of goods, or perform a specified service within a specified time. The purchase order confirmation business object is a communication from a supplier to a purchaser to advise that a purchase order has been received. In particular, a purchase order confirmation may advise that the purchaser of the supplier is accepting the purchase order, or the supplier proposing has made changes to the purchase order, or the supplier is not accepting the purchase order.
The Goods and Service Acknowledgement process component 132 includes a Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object. The Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object is a document that states the recipient's obligation, for example, a purchaser's obligation, to pay the supplier for goods received or services rendered. An invoice is normally created after the goods and service acknowledgement has been confirmed.
The Supplier Invoicing deployment unit 108 includes a Supplier Invoice Processing process component 136. The Supplier Invoice Processing process component 136 includes a supplier invoice business object and a supplier invoice request business object. The supplier invoice business object is a document that states the recipient's obligation to pay the supplier for goods received or services rendered. The invoice may be created after the goods and service acknowledgment has been confirmed. The supplier invoice request business object is a document that is sent to invoice verification, advising that an invoice for specified quantities and prices is expected and may be created through evaluation settlement. The system uses the invoice request as a basis for invoice verification, as well as for the automatic creation of the invoice.
The Payment deployment unit 110 includes a Payment Process component 138. The Payment Processing process component 138 is used to handle all incoming and outgoing payments as well as represent the main database for a liquidity status.
The RFQ Processing deployment unit 112 includes an RFQ Processing process component 140. The RFQ Processing deployment unit process component 140 includes a Request for Response business object and a Quote business object handles requests for quotation and corresponding quotes. The A request for quotation (RFQ) is a description of materials and services that purchasers use to request responses from potential suppliers. Requests for Quotation can be one of the following a number of types, including: a request for (price) information, a request for quote that may run over a certain period of time, a request for proposal in complex purchasing situation or live auctions that may be performed over a short time frame. The A quote is a response to a request for quotation in which a supplier offers to sell goods and services at a certain price. The quote can be subject to complex pricing and conditions.
The Due Item Management deployment unit 114 includes a Due Item Processing process component 142. The Due Item Processing process component 142 is used to manage all payables, receivables from service and supply and corresponding sales including a withholding tax.
The foundation layer, described below, includes a Source of Supply Determination process component 134.
The Source of Supply Determination process component 134 uses two business objects to determine a source of supply: a supply quota arrangement business object, and a source of supply business object. The supply quota arrangement business object is a distribution of material requirements or goods to different sources of supply, business partners, or organizational units within a company. An example of the use of the supply quota arrangements business object is the distribution of material requirements between in-house production and different sources for external procurement. The supply quota arrangement business object can also define the distribution of goods to customers in case of excess production or shortages. The source of supply business object is an object that describes a logical link between a possible source of products and a possible target.
A number of external process components, described below, will be used to describe the architectural design: a Sales Order Processing at Supplier process component 131, a Goods and Service Confirmation at Supplier process component 133, a Customer Invoice Processing at Supplier process component 137, an Opportunity/Customer Quote Processing at Supplier process component 141, a Payment Processing at Business Partner process component 150, a Bank statement creation at bank process component 152, and a Payment order processing at house bank process component 154.
The Purchase Order Processing process component 130 may send messages to a Sales Order Processing at Supplier process component 131. The Sales Order Processing at Supplier process component 131 handles customers' requests to a company for delivery of goods or services at a certain time. The requests are received by a sales area, which is then responsible for fulfilling the contract.
The Goods and Service Acknowledgement process component 132 may receive messages from a Goods and Service Confirmation at Supplier process component 133. The Goods and Service Confirmation at Supplier process component 133 may serve to confirm orders of goods and services at the supplier.
The Supplier Invoicing deployment unit 108 receives messages from a Customer Invoice Processing at Supplier processing component 137, which is used, at supplier, to charge a customer for the delivery of goods or services.
The RFQ Processing process component 140 may send messages to an Opportunity/Customer Quote Processing at Supplier process component 141. A Customer Quote Processing process component is used to offer to a customer for the delivery of goods or services according to fixed terms. The offer legally binds the company for a certain period of time. An Opportunity Processing process component is used to handle recognized possibilities for sales of products or services. An opportunity can result from a trade fair, a sales deal or a bid invitation. It summarizes a variety of business information such as the expected sales revenue or expected net value.
As shown in
Not explicitly represented in the figures is a foundation layer that contains all fundamental entities that are used in multiple deployment units. These entities can be process components, business objects and reuse service components. A reuse service component is a piece of software that is reused in different transactions. A reuse service component is used by its defined interfaces, which can be local APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) or service interfaces.
In contrast to a deployment unit, the foundation layer does not define a limit for application-defined transactions. Deployment units communicate directly with entities in the foundation layer, which communication is typically not message based. The foundation layer is active in every system instance on which the application is deployed. Business objects in the foundation layer will generally be master data objects. In addition, the foundation layer will include some business process objects that are used by multiple deployment units. Master data objects and business process objects that are specific to a deployment unit should be assigned to their respective deployment unit.
A process component of an external system is drawn as a dashed-line process component (drawn as icon 216). Such a process component may be referred to as an external process component, and it is used to represent the external system in describing interactions with the external system; however, this should be understood to require no more of the external system that it be able to produce and receive messages as required by the process component that interacts with the external system.
The connector icon 218 is used to simplify the drawing of interactions between process components.
Interactions between process component pairs involving their respective business objects, process agents, operations, interfaces, and messages are described as process component interactions, which determine the interactions of a pair of process components across a deployment unit boundary, i.e., from one deployment unit to another deployment unit. Interactions between process components are indicated in
The architectural design is a specification of a computer software application, and elements of the architectural design can be implemented to realize a software application that implements the end-to-end process mentioned earlier. The elements of the architecture are at times described in this specification as being contained or included in other elements; for example, a process component is described as being contained in a deployment unit. It should be understood, however, that such operational inclusion can be realized in a variety of ways and is not limited to a physical inclusion of the entirety of one element in another.
The architectural elements include the business object. A business object is a representation of a type of a uniquely identifiable business entity (an object instance) described by a structural model. Processes operate on business objects.
A business object represents a specific view on some well-defined business content. A business object represents content, which a typical business user would expect and understand with little explanation. Business objects are further categorized as business process objects and master data objects. A master data object is an object that encapsulates master data (i.e., data that is valid for a period of time). A business process object, which is the kind of business object generally found in a process component, is an object that encapsulates transactional data (i.e., data that is valid for a point in time). The term business object will be used generically to refer to a business process object and a master data object, unless the context requires otherwise. Properly implemented, business objects are implemented free of redundancies.
The architectural elements also include the process component. A process component is a software package that realizes a business process and generally exposes its functionality as services. The functionality contains business transactions. A process component contains one or more semantically related business objects. Any business object belongs to no more than one process component.
Process components are modular and context-independent. That they are context-independent means that a process component is not specific to any specific application and is reusable. The process component is the smallest (most granular) element of reuse in the architecture.
The architectural elements also include the operation. An operation belongs to exactly one process component. A process component generally has multiple operations. Operations can be synchronous or asynchronous, corresponding to synchronous or asynchronous process agents, which will be described below. An operation is the smallest, separately-callable function, described by a set of data types used as input, output, and fault parameters serving as a signature.
The architectural elements also include the service interface, referred to simply as the interface. An interface is a named group of operations. Each operation belongs to exactly one interface. An interface belongs to exactly one process component. A process component might contain multiple interfaces. In one implementation, an interface contains only inbound or outbound operations, but not a mixture of both. One interface can contain both synchronous and asynchronous operations. All operations of the same type (either inbound or outbound) which belong to the same message choreography will belong to the same interface. Thus, generally, all outbound operations to the same other process component are in one interface.
The architectural elements also include the message. Operations transmit and receive messages. Any convenient messaging infrastructure can be used. A message is information conveyed from one process component instance to another, with the expectation that activity will ensue. An operation can use multiple message types for inbound, outbound, or error messages. When two process components are in different deployment units, invocation of an operation of one process component by the other process component is accomplished by an operation on the other process component sending a message to the first process component.
The architectural elements also include the process agent. Process agents do business processing that involves the sending or receiving of messages. Each operation will generally have at least one associated process agent. A process agent can be associated with one or more operations. Process agents can be either inbound or outbound, and either synchronous or asynchronous.
Asynchronous outbound process agents are called after a business object changes, e.g., after a create, update, or delete of a business object instance.
Synchronous outbound process agents are generally triggered directly by a business object.
An output process agent will generally perform some processing of the data of the business object instance whose change triggered the event. An outbound agent triggers subsequent business process steps by sending messages using well-defined outbound services to another process component, which generally will be in another deployment unit, or to an external system. An outbound process agent is linked to the one business object that triggers the agent, but it is sent not to another business object but rather to another process component. Thus, the outbound process agent can be implemented without knowledge of the exact business object design of the recipient process component.
Inbound process agents are called after a message has been received. Inbound process agents are used for the inbound part of a message-based communication. An inbound process agent starts the execution of the business process step requested in a message by creating or updating one or multiple business object instances. An inbound process agent is not the agent of a business object but of its process component. An inbound process agent can act on multiple business objects in a process component.
Synchronous agents are used when a process component requires a more or less immediate response from another process component, and is waiting for that response to continue its work.
The architectural elements also include the deployment unit. A deployment unit one or more process components that are deployed together on a single computer system platform. Conversely, separate deployment units can be deployed on separate physical computing systems. The process components of one deployment unit interact with those of another deployment unit using messages passed through one or more data communication networks or other suitable communication channels. Thus, a deployment unit deployed on a platform belonging one business can interact with a deployment unit software entity deployed on a separate platform belonging to a different and unrelated business, allowing for business-to-business communication. More than one instance of a given deployment unit can execute at the same time, on the same computing system or on separate physical computing systems. This arrangement allows the functionality offered by a deployment unit to be scaled to meet demand by creating as many instances as needed.
Since interaction between deployment units is through service operations, a deployment unit can be replaced by other another deployment unit as long as the new deployment unit supports the operations depended upon by other deployment units. Thus, while deployment units can depend on the external interfaces of process components in other deployment units, deployment units are not dependent on process component interaction within other deployment units. Similarly, process components that interact with other process components or external systems only through messages, e.g., as sent and received by operations, can also be replaced as long as the replacement supports the operations of the original.
Interactions Between Process Components “Customer Invoice Processing at Supplier” and “Supplier Invoice Processing”
The Supplier Invoice Processing process component 304 receives an Invoice Request message 306 into an Invoicing In interface 308. The Invoicing In interface 308 includes a Create Invoice operation 310 that creates a supplier invoice based on information received from the supplier or a different invoicing party. A Create Supplier Invoice based on Invoice Request inbound process agent 312 updates a Supplier Invoice business object 314. The Supplier Invoice business object 314 is a document that states a recipient's obligation to pay the supplier for goods received or services rendered.
After the update occurs, a Confirm Invoice to Supplier outbound process agent 316 sends an update to an Invoicing Out interface 318, which includes a Confirm Invoice operation 320. The Confirm Invoice operation 320 sends an Invoice Confirmation message 321 to notify the supplier whether the previously sent invoice is accepted or rejected, depending on the outcome of invoice verification. A Request ERS Invoice to Supplier outbound process agent 322 may also be triggered to send a message to the Customer Invoice Processing at Supplier process component 302 via an ERS I Invoicing Out interface 323. The ERS Invoicing Out interface 323 creates an Invoice Request message 324 by a Request ERS Invoice operation 326.
Interactions Between Process Components “Payment Processing” and “Accounting”
The Bill of Exchange Submission business object 406 sends incoming bill of exchange receivables to the house bank for cashing. The Incoming Check business object 408 represents a check sent by a business partner. The incoming check will be sent to the house bank by a check deposit. The Check Deposit business object 410 sends a collection of incoming checks to the house bank for cashing. The Payment Order business object 412 creates payment media for a bank, a credit card, a settlement institute, or a business partner on the base of payment requests. The Bank Statement business object 414 is a bank statement for a house bank account. The Bill of Exchange Receivable business object 416 represents a bill of exchange received from a business partner or a bill of exchange request sent to a business partner. The Cash Transfer business object 418 is a document that shows an internal money transfer between: a bank account and another bank account (bank transfer), a cash account and a bank account (cash deposit), a bank account and a cash account (cash withdrawal), or a cash account and another cash account (cash transfer). The Payment Allocation business object 420 documents a process step by which open payments of different types belonging to one another are indicated as confirmed or sent to other components for post processing. For example, an incoming check may confirm a payment advice or a bank statement item may confirm a check deposit. In another example, an incoming bank transfer from bank statement processing may be sent to Due Item Management for clearing. The Clearing House Payment Order business object 422 is an order document for clearing a collection of credit card payments to the clearing house. The Cash Payment business object 424 is a document showing an incoming or outgoing cash payment from or to a business partner.
The Payment Processing process component 402 also includes a number of outbound process agents, each tied to a particular business object. The Notify of Payment from Bill of Exchange Submission to Accounting outbound process agent 426 creates an accounting notification from the Bill of Exchange Submission business object 406. The Notify of Payment from Incoming Check to Accounting outbound process agent 428 may notify the Accounting process component 404 of a bounced or cancelled check. The Notify of Payment from Check Deposit to Accounting outbound process agent 430 may notify the Accounting process component 404 of a change in status of a check deposit. For example, a notification may be sent stating that a deposit is ready for transfer to another account. The Notify of Payment from Payment Order to Accounting outbound process agent 432 may notify the Accounting process component 404 of a payment by payment order or a cancellation of payment. The Notify of Payment from Bank Statement to Accounting outbound process agent 434 may notify the Accounting process component 404 of a payment by bank account or a cancellation of payment. The Notify of Payment from BoE Receivable to Accounting outbound process agent 436 may notify the Accounting process component 404 of a payment made by a bill of exchange or a cancellation of payment. The Notify of Payment from Cash Transfer to Accounting outbound process component 438 may notify the Accounting process component 404 about a transfer of money between house bank accounts and/or cash accounts or a cancellation of payment. The Notify of Payment from Payment Allocation to Accounting outbound process agent 440 may notify the Accounting process component 404 of a payment made by a payment allocation or a cancellation of payment. The Notify of Payment from Credit Card Settlement to Accounting outbound process agent 442 may notify the Accounting process component 404 of a payment made by credit card or a cancellation of payment. The Notify of Payment from Cash Payment to Accounting outbound process agent 444 may notify the Accounting process component 404 of a payment made by cash or a cancellation of payment.
The outbound process agents above may cause invocation of a Notify of Payment operation 446 or a Notify of Payment Cancellation operation 448 to update accounting. The operations may be included in a Payment Accounting Out interface 450. An operation in the Payment Accounting Out interface 450 may send a Payment Accounting Notification message 452 or a Payment Accounting Cancellation Notification message 454 to a Payment Accounting In interface 456 in the Accounting process component 404. The Payment Accounting In interface 456 includes a Create Accounting Document operation 458 or a Cancel Accounting Document operation 460 depending on the received message. A Maintain Accounting Document based on Payment inbound processing component 462 updates the Accounting Notification business object 464. The Accounting Notification business object 464 is a common input channel for all kinds of operational business transactions into Financial Accounting. The Accounting Notification business object 464 may also be called by operational components in order to record the business transactions in financial accounting.
Interactions Between Process Components “Internal Request Processing” and “Supplier Invoice Processing”
The Supplier Invoice component 504 may receive the Supplier Invoice message 514 and use the message 514 to automatically create an invoice for the completed open amount of requested goods or services. The Supplier Invoice process component 504 includes an Internal Invoicing In interface 516 and a Supplier Invoice business object 522. The Internal Invoicing In interface 516 includes a Create Invoice operation 518. The received Supplier Invoice message 514 may invoke the Create Invoice operation 518 to create a supplier invoice based on an internal request included in the Supplier Invoice message 514. The Supplier Invoice business object 522 is a document that states the recipient's, such as the purchaser's, obligation to pay the supplier for goods received or services rendered. The Create Invoice operation 518 then updates the Supplier Invoice 522 using a Create Supplier Invoice based on Supplier Invoice Request process agent 520.
Interactions Between Process Components “Payment Processing” and “Payment Order Processing at House Bank”
Various process agents are used to send updates for each of these business objects 606, 608, 610, and 612. The Request Payment Order from BoE Receivable to House Bank outbound process agent 614 creates an electronic Bill of Exchange Receivable (Request). The Request Payment Order from Outgoing Check to House Bank outbound process agent 616 creates an outgoing check to be printed externally. The Request Payment Order from BoE Payable to House Bank outbound process agent 618 creates an electronic Bill of Exchange Payable. The Request Payment Order from Bank Payment Order to House Bank outbound process agent 620 creates a Payment order to House Bank.
The Payment Ordering out interface 622 receives the updates from the outbound process agents 614, 616, 618, and 620. A Request Payment Order operation 624 collects Bank Transfers or Direct Debits for payment submission to the business partner. A Collective Payment Order Request message 626 is generated and processed by the Payment order processing at house bank process component 604. Upon completion of processing, a Collective Payment Order Confirmation message 628 is sent to the Payment Ordering In interface 630 that includes a Maintain Payment Order Confirmation operation 632 to confirm the status updates from processing a payment order. After completing the operation 632, an update is sent to the Bank Payment Order business object 612 using a Maintain Payment Order Confirmation from House Bank inbound process agent 634.
Interactions Between Process Components “Purchase Order Processing” and “Sales Order Processing at Supplier”
The Request Purchase Order Cancellation operation 714 requests a Cancellation of a Purchase Order that was formerly ordered at a supplier, which creates a Purchase Order Cancellation Request message 718. The Request Purchase Order Change operation 716 requests a change of a purchase order that was formerly ordered at the supplier which creates a Purchase Order Change Request message 720. The Request Purchase Order Creation operation 712 requests a Purchase Order from a Supplier that creates a Purchase Order Change Request 722.
Upon receiving a create, a change, or a cancellation message, the Sales Order Processing process component 704 may create a Purchase Order Confirmation message 723 to update the Purchase Order Processing component 702. To complete the update, a Create Purchase Order Confirmation operation 724, included in an Order In interface 725, may transfer the update to the Purchase Order Confirmation business object 728 by using a Create Purchase Order inbound process agent 726. The Purchase Order Confirmation business object 728 is a confirmation from an external supplier to the request of a purchaser to deliver a specified quantity of material, or perform a specified service, at a specified price within a specified time.
Interactions Between Process Components “Supplier Invoice Processing” and “Due Item Processing”
A Supplier Invoice Processing process component 802 includes a Supplier Invoice business object 806, which is a document that states the recipient's (usually the purchaser's) obligation to pay the supplier for goods received or services rendered. The invoice is normally created after the goods and service acknowledgment has been confirmed. The Notify Supplier of Invoice to a Due Item Processing outbound process agent 808 invokes a Notify of Invoice operation 810 to notify the Due Item processing component 804 about the receivables/payables due for the invoice that has been paid. Alternatively, a Request Invoice Cancellation operation 812 may be invoked to cancel the previously sent notification for receivables/payables due. Both operations may be included in a Receivables Payables Out interface 814. If the Notify of Invoice operation 810 is invoked, then a Receivables Payables Notification message 816 is sent to the Due Item Processing process component 804. If the Request Invoice Cancellation operation 812 is invoked, the Receivables/Payables Cancellation Request message 818 is sent to the Due Item Processing process component 804.
The Receivables/Payables Messages 816 and 818 are received by a Receivables/Payables In interface 820 where operations may be performed. If the notification message 816 is received, then a Create Receivables/Payables operation 822 is performed to create a trade and/or tax receivable or payable. If the cancellation message 818 is received, then a Cancel Receivables/Payables operation 824 is performed to cancel a trade and/or tax receivable or payable. Cancellations and updates may be sent by a Maintain Trade and Tax Receivables Payables inbound process agent 826 to one or more of three business objects: a Trade Receivables Payables business object 828, A Tax Receivables Payables business object 830, and a Due Clearing business object 832. The Trade Receivables Payables business object 828 may register for all trade receivables and payables from goods and services of a company from/to its business partners. The Tax Receivables Payables business object 830 may register for all tax receivables and payables of a company that are due for delivered goods and rendered services between buyers and sellers, the consumption of goods, and the transfer of goods that are withheld from payments to vendors. The Due Clearing business object 832 is group of receivables and payables for clearing.
Interactions Between Process Components “Purchase Order Processing” and “Accounting”
The outbound process agent 908 sends notification into an Order Accounting Out interface 910 which includes a Notify of Purchase Order operation 912. The Notify of Purchase Order operation 912 may occur when a purchase order has been created, changed or cancelled. An Order Accounting Notification message 914 may then be sent to the Accounting process component 904.
The Accounting process component 904 receives the Order Accounting Notification message 914 in an Order Accounting In interface 916 which includes a Maintain Subledger Account operation 918 that receives order accounting notifications from the Purchase Order Processing process component 902. The notification is to inform Accounting Processing process component 904 about the creation, the change or the deletion of any kind of order business objects. The notification may then be sent to the Accounting Notification business object 922 using a Maintain Subledger Account based on Order inbound process agent 920. The Accounting Notification business object 922 is a common input channel for all kinds of operational business transactions into financial accounting that is called by operational components in order to record the business transactions in financial accounting.
Interactions Between Process Components “RFQ Processing” and “Opportunity/Customer Quote Processing at Supplier”
The Request for Quote Process component 1002 includes two business objects: a Request for Quote business object 1006 and a Supplier Quote business object 1008. The Request for Quote business object 1006 is a request from a buyer to a bidder to submit a quote for a material or a service according to specified criteria. The Supplier Quote business object 1008 is a response to a Request for Quote, in which a supplier offers to sell materials and services according to the requested criteria.
An update of the Request for Quote business object 1006 may trigger a Request Quote Maintenance from Request for Quote to Supplier outbound process agent 1010 to call an operation included in a Request Quote Processing Out interface 1012. The Request Quote Processing Out interface 1012 includes a Request Quote Creation operation 1014, a Notify of Request for Quote Change operation 1016, and a Notify of Response for Quote Cancellation operation 1018. The Request Quote Creation operation 1014 sends an RFQ message 1020 to a supplier to participate in an RFQ process. The Notify of Request for Quote Change operation 1016 notifies the changes of a published Request for Quote to a supplier to participate in the further RFQ process and sends a RFQ Change Request message 1022 to the Opportunity/Customer Quote Processing at Supplier process component 1004. The Notify of Response for Quote Cancellation operation 1018 notifies the Opportunity/Customer Quote Processing at Supplier process component 1004 about a cancellation of the Request for Quote to the Supplier by sending an RFQ Cancellation Request message 1024.
Additionally, the RFQ Processing process component includes a Supplier Quote Processing In interface 1026. A Quote Notification message 1028 may be received in the Supplier Quote Processing In interface 1026, and a Maintain Supplier Quote operation 1030, included in the Supplier Quote Processing In interface 1026, may update the Supplier quote business object 1008 using a Maintain Supplier Quote inbound process agent 1032.
When the status of the Request for Quote business object 1006 is “Published” or “Closed” and the status of Supplier Quote is “Returned”, a Request Quote Maintenance from Supplier Quote to Supplier outbound process agent 1034 may be triggered to send an update to a supplier using a Supplier Quote Processing Out interface 1036. The Supplier Quote Processing Out interface 1036 includes a Request Quote Change operation 1038 that, when called, may send an RFQ Change Request message 1040 to send back the supplier quote.
When the status of the Supplier Quote business object 1008 is set to “Accepted” or “Rejected”, a Notify of Quote Award from Supplier Quote to Supplier outbound process agent 1042 may be triggered to send, via the Supplier Quote Processing Out interface 1036, an update to supplier. The Supplier Quote Processing Out interface 1036 includes a Notify of Quote Award operation 1044 that when called, may send an RFQ Result Notification message 1046, which may include an acceptance or final rejection information of the quote, to the supplier.
Interactions Between Process Components “Purchase Order Processing” and “Supplier Invoice Processing”
In this illustration, the Notify of Invoiced Values from SIR to Purchase Order Processing outbound process agent 1124 includes a Notify of Invoiced Values operation 1126 of an Invoice Verification Out interface 1128 to send a Supplier Invoice Request Invoiced Values Notification message 1130 that will be received by components in the Purchase Order Processing process component 1102. The notification message is sent to make certain that if parts of a purchase order have been previously posted, the corresponding purchase order is not changed to an amount lower than the one that has already been delivered. Upon receipt of the message, the Invoice Verification In interface 1132 includes a Change Purchase Order based on Invoiced Values operation 1134 to change appropriate invoiced quantities in the purchase order. The updated change information is sent to the Purchase Order business object 1106 using the Change Purchase Order based on Invoiced Values inbound process agent 1136. This message is sent in order to be able to change the invoiced quantity.
Interactions Between Process Components “Goods and Service Acknowledgement” and “Accounting”
If the Notify of Goods and Service Acknowledgement to Accounting outbound process agent 1208 calls the Notify of Goods and Service Acknowledgement Cancellation operation 1214, the operation 1214 may send accounting information about cancellation of rendered goods or services to the Accounting process component 1204 by transmitting a Goods and Service Acknowledgement Cancellation Request message 1226. The Accounting process component 1204 may receive the message 1226 through the Goods and Service Accounting In interface 1218. The Cancel Accounting Document operation 1228 receives the Goods and Service Acknowledgement Cancellation Request message 1226 from the Goods and Service Acknowledgement process component 1202. The operation 1228 may also trigger the Maintain Accounting Document based on a Goods and Service Acknowledgement Description inbound process agent 1222 to cancel the Accounting Notification business object 1224.
Interactions Between Process Components “Goods and Service Confirmation at Supplier” and “Goods and Service Acknowledgement”
The Goods and Service Acknowledgement process component 1304 includes a Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 1306. The Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 1306 is a document that reports the receipt of goods and services. For example, employees of a company can confirm that they have received the goods and services they ordered through internal requests using the Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 1306. The Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 1306 may receive updates when the Goods and Service Acknowledgement component 1304 receives a Service Acknowledgement Request message 1308. Through an Acknowledgement In interface 1310, which includes a Create Goods and Service Acknowledgement operation 1312, the Service Acknowledgement Request message 1308 may be received. Next, the Create Goods and Service Acknowledgement operation 1312 creates a goods and service acknowledgement based on information received from the received Service Acknowledgement Request message 1308. In some embodiments, a supplier may also create a Goods and Service Acknowledgment by Extensible Markup Language (XML). The Create Goods and Service Acknowledgement operation 1312 updates, using a Create Goods and Service Acknowledgment based on Service Acknowledgement Request inbound process agent 1314, the Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 1306.
After the update occurs, a Confirm Goods and Service Acknowledgement to Supplier outbound process agent 1316 invokes a Confirm Goods and Service Acknowledgement operation 1318, included in a Acknowledgement Out interface 1320, to send a Service Acknowledgement Confirmation message 1322 to notify the supplier whether the previously sent service Acknowledgement Request message 1308 is accepted or rejected.
Interactions Between Process Components “Due Item Processing” and “Payment Processing”
The process components include business objects to create and update data by passing messages between a Payment Processing process component 1404 and a Due Item Processing process component 1402. Multiple operations can be carried out within the interfaces. Both inbound and outbound process agents carry the business object data to and from the interfaces.
A Due Payment business object 1406 and a Product Tax Declaration business object 1408 are shown in
A Sync Request Payment Reservation interface from Due Payment to Payment Processing outbound process component 1410 may create a payment reservation request from Due Payment. A Payment Request Out interface 1412 includes several operations which go on to create messages and updates to business objects in the Payment Processing process component 1404. The operations, messaging and business objects are discussed in the following paragraphs.
A Sync Request Payment Reservation interface from Due Payment to Payment Processing outbound process component 1410 may also send a message initiating a payment from Product Tax Declaration, by invoking a synchronous Request payment information and provisional Payment Reservation operation 1414 to generate a Payment Order Reservation Request message 1416. The message is received in a Payment Request In interface 1413 having a synchronous Create Payment Reservation operation 1418 that checks and determines payment data and creates a reservation of payment. A Payment Order Reservation Confirmation message 1420 may be sent back to the Due Item Processing process component 1402. Next, a Synchronous Maintain Payment Reservation outbound process component 1422 may update the Payment Order business object 1424.
The Payment Request Out interface 1412 may also include a Notify of provisional Payment Reservation Deletion operation 1417 that registers the change of a provisional payment to the last transactional or saved state. A Payment Order Reservation Cancellation Notification message 1426 may be generated and a Cancel Payment Reservation operation 1428 may be invoked that cancels a previously sent payment reservation by reference.
The Payment Request Out interface 1412 may also include a synchronous Request Payment Information and Provisional Payment Reservation Change operation 1419 that requests payment information with a provisional reservation of money in payment processing. A Payment Order Reservation Change Request message 1430 is generated, and a synchronous Sync Change Payment Reservation operation 1432 is invoked that changes a reservation of payment and confirm the change to the caller. Next, a Payment Order Reservation Change Confirmation message 1434 may be generated and sent back to the Due Item Processing process component 1402.
The Payment Request Out interface 1412 may also include a Notify of Provisional Payment Reservation Change Deletion operation 1421 that registers the change of a provisional payment to the last transactional/saved state. A Payment Order Reservation Change Cancellation Notification message 1436 may be generated, and a Change Payment Reservation operation 1438 may be invoked that changes a previously sent payment reservation by reference.
A Request Payment from Due Payment to Payment Processing outbound process agent 1442 may send a payment update from a Due Payment business object 1406. A Request Payment operation 1444 is then invoked that sends a request for payment to Payment Processing. This operation may confirm a provisional payment made before. Upon completion of the operation, a Payment Order Request message 1446 is sent to the Payment Processing process component 1404, where a Create Payment Order operation 1448 begins. Then, a Maintain Payment Order inbound process agent 1440 may update the Payment Order business object 1424 to create or cancel a payment order.
The Payment Order business object 1424 may use a Confirm Payment Request from Payment Order to Due Item Processing outbound process agent 1464 to confirm the processing status of a payment to the sender of a payment request. A Confirm Payment operation 1462, contained in a Payment Request Out interface 1461, may then be invoked, thereby generating a Payment Order Request Confirmation message 1460 to send to the Due Item Processing process component 1402, where it is received by a Change Payment based on Payment Request Confirmation operation 1458 provided by a Payment Request In interface 1457. A Change Due Payment based on Payment Request Confirmation interface may update the processing status of Due Payment based on the confirmation of a payment request. A Request Payment from Product Tax Declaration to Payment Processing outbound process agent 1459 may send an update from a Product Tax Declaration business object 1408. The update is sent into the Payment Request Out interface 1412, and a Request Payment Cancellation operation 1450 is invoked to cancel a provisional, requested or ordered payment. A Payment Order Cancellation Request message 1452 is then generated and sent to the Payment Processing process component 1404 where a Cancel Payment Order operation 1454 is invoked.
Interactions Between Process Components “RFQ Processing” and “Purchase Order Processing”
Interactions Between Process Components “Bank Statement Creation at Bank” and “Payment Processing”
As shown in
Interactions Between Process Components “Purchase Request Processing” and “RFQ Processing”
In the Purchase Request Processing process component 1702, a Request Request for Quote Execution from Purchase Request to RFQ Processing outbound process agent 1708 requests the execution of a request for quote. The outbound process agent 1708 uses a Request Request for Quote Execution operation 1712 to send an RFQ Execution Request message 1714 to the RFQ Processing process component 1704. The Request Request for Quote Execution operation 1712 is part of a Request for Quote Out interface 1710.
The RFQ Execution Request message 1714 is received by a Maintain Request for Quote operation 1718 in a Request for Quote In interface 1716, where the operation 1718 initiates a Maintain Request for Quote inbound process agent 1720, which creates or updates a Request For Quote business object out of business documents, such as the Request for Quote business object document 1722, that are involved in the bidding process or in the negotiation process. Next, the Confirm Request for Quote outbound process agent 1724 receives the request for quote and initiates a Confirm Request for Quote operation 1728 in a Request for Quote Out Interface 1726.
The Confirm Request for Quote operation 1728 sends a RFQ Execution Confirmation message 1730 to the Purchase Request processing component 1702 to confirm a RFQ execution. The Change Purchase Request operation 1734, which is part of a Request for Quote In interface 1732, receives the message and initiates a Change Purchase Request based on Request for Quote inbound process agent 1736. The inbound process agent 1736 updates the references of the purchase request in the Purchase Request business object 1706.
Interactions Between Process Components “Supplier Invoice Processing” and “Accounting”
The Supplier Invoice Processing process component 1802 includes a Supplier Invoice business object 1806. The Supplier Invoice business object 1806 represents a document that states a recipient's obligation to pay a supplier for goods received or services rendered. For example, the Supplier Invoice business object 1806 may be created after a goods and service acknowledgement has been confirmed. The Supplier Invoice business object 1806 may then trigger a Notify of Supplier Invoice to Accounting outbound process agent 1808, which notifies accounting of the existence of the supplier invoice. For example, once the supplier invoice is posted to the system, the outbound processing agent 1808 sends a notification to accounting stating the Supplier Invoice business object 1806 has been posted.
The processing agent provides an Invoice Accounting Out interface 1810 with the notification and additional data such as invoice billing numbers or a credit memo. Here, the interface 1810 includes a Notify of Invoice operation 1812 and a Request Invoice Cancellation operation 1814. The Notify of Invoice operation 1812 may be invoked if the Invoice Accounting Out interface 1810 receives a notification to post an invoice. Upon performing the Notify of Invoice operation 1812, an Invoice Accounting Notification message 1816 is sent with the invoice accounting notification. Alternatively, the Request Invoice Cancellation operation 1814 may be invoked if the Invoice Accounting interface 1810 receives information requesting a cancellation. For example, the Request Invoice Cancellation operation 1814 may be invoked in order to cancel an invoice. Upon performing the Request Invoice Cancellation operation 1814, an Invoice Cancellation Accounting Notification message 1818 is transmitted to the Accounting process component 1804.
The Accounting process component 1804 includes an Invoice Accounting In interface 1820 that may receive messages sent by the Supplier Invoice Processing process component 1804. Here, the Invoice Accounting interface 1820 includes a Create Accounting Document operation 1822 that creates an accounting document for a customer invoice or supplier invoice if accounting receives the Invoice Accounting Notification message 1816. The Invoice Accounting In interface 1820 also includes a Cancel Accounting Document operation 1824 that cancels a customer or supplier invoice.
The Accounting process component 1804 includes a Maintain Accounting Document based on Invoice inbound process agent 1826 that can maintain accounting documents. For example, the inbound process agent 1826 may update the accounting document if a creation or cancellation operation is received. After updating the accounting document, the inbound process agent 1826 may forward information about the updated document into the Accounting Notification business object 1828. The Accounting Notification business object 1828 may receive input from operational business transactions, such as the invoice notification above, and record the business transactions in a Financial Accounting deployment unit.
Interactions Between Process Components “Internal Request Processing” and “Purchase Request Processing”
The Purchase Request Processing process component 1904 may receive the Purchase Request Request message 1914 using a Purchasing In interface 1916. Upon receiving the Purchase Request Request message 1914, the Purchasing In interface 1916 includes a Maintain Purchase Request operation 1918 to create or update a request from a requestor to a purchaser to externally procure products (e.g. material, or services). For example, the Maintain Purchase Request operation 1918 may create, using a Maintain Purchase Request inbound process agent 1920, a Purchase Request business object 1922. The Purchase Request business object 1922 is a request or instruction to the purchasing specified goods or services in specified quantities within a specified time.
A creation, update, or cancellation of the Purchase Request business object 1922 may trigger a Confirm Purchase Request outbound process agent 1924. The Confirm Purchase Request outbound process agent 1924 may invoke a Confirmation Purchase Request operation 1928 to transmit a confirmation of the creation, update, or cancellation of the Purchase Request business object 1922. The Confirmation Purchase Request operation 1928 then sends, via a Purchasing Out interface 1926, a Purchase Request Confirmation message 1930 to the Internal Request Processing process component 1902.
The Internal Request Processing process component 1902 receives the Purchase Request Confirmation message 1930 through a Purchasing In interface 1932. The Purchasing In interface 1932 includes a Change Internal Request based on Procurement Progress operation 1934. The Change Internal Request based on Procurement Progress operation 1934 confirms the creation, change, or cancellation of the Purchase Request business object 1922 by updating the Internal Request business object 1906 using a Change Internal Request based on Procurement Progress inbound process agent 1936.
Interactions Between Process Components “Internal Request Processing” and “Goods and Service Acknowledgement”
The Goods and Service Acknowledgement process component 2004 receives the message in an Internal Acknowledgement In interface 2016, which includes a Create Goods and Service Acknowledgment operation 2018 to receive Goods and Service Acknowledgement Notification. The Create Goods and Service Acknowledgment operation 2018 creates good and service acknowledgement based on goods and service acknowledgement request. The operation 2018 invokes a Maintain GSA based on Internal Acknowledgement inbound process agent 2020 to send the updates to a Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 2022. The Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 2022 is a document that reports the receipt of goods and services. In one example, the Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 2022 may be used when employees of a company can confirm that they have received the goods and services they ordered through internal requests. In another example, the Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 2022 may be used when purchasers, or designated recipients of goods and services, can confirm that they have received the goods and services they ordered on behalf of the employees for whom they are responsible. In yet another example, the Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 2022 may be used when suppliers or service providers can report that they have delivered the requested goods, or have rendered the requested services.
Interactions Between Process Components “Due Item Processing” and “Accounting”
The business objects send updates into one of three outbound process agents: a Notify of Payment from Due Clearing to Accounting outbound process agent 2112, which sends notification for a clearing of trade receivables and/or payables to Accounting, a Notify of Payment from Due Payment to Accounting outbound process agent 2114, which sends notification to Accounting for inward or outward trade receivables and/or payables payments, and a Notify of Payment from Product Tax Declaration to Accounting 2116, which sends notification for a payment of tax receivables and/or payables to Accounting.
A Payment Accounting Out interface 2118 includes a Notify of Payment operation 2120, which sends a Payment Accounting Notification message 2121 to the Accounting process component 2104 notifying financial accounting about inward or outward movements of trade or tax receivables or payables. Alternatively, a Request Payment Cancellation operation 2122 is invoked that sends a Payment Accounting Cancellation Request message 2123 to the Accounting process component 2104 canceling an inward or outward movement of trade or tax receivables or payables in Financial Accounting.
The Accounting process component 2104 receives the messages in a Payment Accounting In interface 2124, which includes a Create Accounting Document operation 2126 to receive Payment Accounting Notification from Payment Processing or Due Item Processing. If the message received was a cancellation, a Cancel Accounting Document operation 2128 is invoked which cancels the payment processing or due item processing. Updates are sent to an Accounting Notification business object 2130 using a Maintain Accounting Document based on Payment inbound process agent 2132. The Accounting Notification business object 2130 is a common input channel for all kinds of operational business transactions into financial accounting that is called by operational components in order to record the business transactions in Financial Accounting.
Interactions Between Process Components “Goods and Service Acknowledgement” and “Supplier Invoice Processing”
The process component interaction model begins the Goods and Service Acknowledgement process component 2202 with a Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 2206 having an update. The Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 2206 is a document that reports the receipt of goods and services. When the Goods and Service Acknowledgement business object 2206 is updated, a notification may be sent using a Notify of Invoicing Due from GSA to Supplier Invoice Processing outbound process agent 2208. The Invoice Verification Out interface 2210 includes a Notify of Invoice Due operation 2212 that may be called in case of a change in a contract related invoice is posted. When a GSA is created, the Supplier Invoice Processing process component 2204 needs to be informed because this information is necessary incase of goods receipt based invoice verification. An Invoicing Due Notification message 2214 is sent to an Invoice Verification In interface 2216 in the Supplier Invoice Processing process component 2204. A Maintain Invoice Request operation 2218 may be invoked to create or update a reference object in the Supplier Invoice Processing process component 2204 to perform invoice verification with reference to a purchase order. The reference object is used for checks against the preceding documents and to make proposals for invoice entry. The Supplier Invoice Request business object 2222 is a document for invoice verification that is advising an invoice for specified quantities and prices to be expected or to be created through evaluation settlement. The system uses the Supplier Invoice Request business object 2222 as a basis for invoice verification, as well as for the automatic creation of the invoice. An update to the Supplier Invoice Request business object 2222, will be sent using a Maintain Supplier Invoice Request inbound process agent 2220.
Interactions Between Process Components “Payment Processing” and “Payment Processing at Business Partner”
The interaction model begins in the Payment Processing process component 2302 with a Payment Order business object 2306. The Payment Order business object 2306 creates payment media for either a bank, a credit card a settlement institute, or a business partner on the base of payment requests. After the payment is created, the Payment Order business object 2306 sends a notification using a Notify of Payment from the Payment Order to the Business Partner outbound process agent 2308. A Payment Order can create different (sub) items within a payment, one for each check, bank transfer etc. that is sent if the payment medium is subject to amount limitations. The Payment Processing process component 2302 also contains an outgoing payment Advicing Out interface 2310 that includes a Notify of Payment operation 2312. The Notify of Payment operation creates a payment advice and sends a Payment Advice Notification message 2314 to the Payment Processing at Business Partner processing component 2304.
The subject matter described in this specification and all of the functional operations described in this specification can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structural means disclosed in this specification and structural equivalents thereof, or in combinations of them. The subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more computer programs tangibly embodied in an information carrier, e.g., in a machine-readable storage device or in a propagated signal, for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers. A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data, in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. Information carriers suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
To provide for interaction with a user, the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented on a computer having a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.
The subject matter described in this specification can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back-end component (e.g., a data server), a middleware component (e.g., an application server), or a front-end component (e.g., a client computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the subject matter described herein), or any combination of such back-end, middleware, and front-end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples of communication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a wide area network (“WAN”), e.g., the Internet.
The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other.
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as an exemplification of preferred embodiments of the invention. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment may also be provided in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
The subject matter has been described in terms of particular variations, but other variations can be implemented and are within the scope of the following claims. For example, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. As one example, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Other variations are within the scope of the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4947321 | Spence et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5361198 | Harmon et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5550734 | Tarter et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5560005 | Hoover et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5566097 | Myers et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5586312 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5590277 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5632022 | Warren et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5634127 | Cloud et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5680619 | Gudmundson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5704044 | Tarter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5710917 | Musa et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5768119 | Havekost et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5822585 | Nobel et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832218 | Gibbs et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5848291 | Milne et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870588 | Rompaey et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5881230 | Christensen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893106 | Brobst et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5898872 | Richley | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5918219 | Isherwood | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5987247 | Lau | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991536 | Brodsky et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| H001830 | Petrimoulx et al. | Jan 2000 | H |
| 6028997 | Leymann et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6038393 | Iyengar et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049838 | Miller et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6067559 | Allard et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6070197 | Cobb et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6112024 | Almond et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6151582 | Huang et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6167563 | Fontana et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167564 | Fontana et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6177932 | Galdes et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182133 | Horvitz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6192390 | Berger et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6208345 | Sheard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6237136 | Sadahiro | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6272672 | Conway | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6311170 | Embrey | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6338097 | Krenzke et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6424991 | Gish | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6434740 | Monday et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442748 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445782 | Elfe et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6446045 | Stone et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6446092 | Sutter | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6493716 | Azagury et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6571220 | Ogino et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6594535 | Costanza | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601234 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6609100 | Smith et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6640238 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6671673 | Baseman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6678882 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6687734 | Sellink et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6691151 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6721783 | Blossman et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6738964 | Zink et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6747679 | Finch et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6750885 | Finch et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6757837 | Platt et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6764009 | Melick et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6772216 | Ankireddipally et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6782536 | Moore et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6789252 | Burke et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6845499 | Srivastava et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6847854 | Discenzo | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6859931 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6889197 | Lidow | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6889375 | Chan et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6895438 | Ulrich | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6898783 | Gupta et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6904399 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6907395 | Hunt et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6954736 | Menninger et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6985939 | Fletcher et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6990466 | Hu | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7003474 | Lidow | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7031998 | Archbold | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7043448 | Campbell | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047518 | Little et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050056 | Meyringer | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050873 | Discenzo | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7055136 | Dzoba et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7058587 | Horne | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7069536 | Yaung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7072855 | Godlewski et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7076766 | Wirts et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7103873 | Tanner et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7117447 | Cobb et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7120597 | Knudtzon et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7120896 | Budhiraja et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7131069 | Rush et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7149887 | Morrison et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155403 | Cirulli et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155409 | Stroh | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7181694 | Reiss et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7184964 | Wang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7191740 | Beringer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194431 | Land et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7197740 | Beringer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7200569 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206768 | deGroeve et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7213232 | Knowles | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7216091 | Blandina et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7219107 | Beringer | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7222786 | Renz et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225240 | Fox et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7249044 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7257254 | Tunney | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7283973 | Loghmani et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7293254 | Bloesch et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7299970 | Ching | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7315830 | Wirtz et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7322024 | Carlson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7324966 | Scheer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7353180 | Silverstone et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7356492 | Hazi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7367011 | Ramsey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7370315 | Lovell et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7376601 | Aldridge | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7376604 | Butcher | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7376632 | Sadek et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7383201 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386833 | Granny et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7406716 | Kanamori et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7415697 | Houlding | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7418409 | Goel | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7418424 | Martin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7424701 | Kendall et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7433979 | Need | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7448022 | Ram et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7451432 | Shukla et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7460654 | Jenkins et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7461030 | Hibler et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7469233 | Shooks et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7516088 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7523054 | Tyson-Quah | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7529699 | Fuse et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536325 | Randell et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536354 | deGroeve et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7546520 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7546575 | Dillman et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7565640 | Shukla et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7574694 | Mangan et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7624371 | Kulkarni et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7631291 | Shukla et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640195 | Von Zimmermann et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640291 | Maturana et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7644390 | Khodabandehloo et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7657406 | Tolone et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7657445 | Goux | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7665083 | Demant et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7668761 | Jenkins et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7672888 | Allin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7681176 | Wills et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7693586 | Dumas et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7703073 | Illowsky et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7739160 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7742985 | Digrigoli et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7747980 | Illowsky et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7765156 | Staniar et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765521 | Bryant | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7788145 | Wadawadigi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7788319 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7793256 | Charisius et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7793258 | Sundararajan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7797698 | Diament et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7814142 | Mamou et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7822682 | Arnold et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7835971 | Stockton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7886041 | Outhred et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7895568 | Goodwin et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 7904350 | Ayala et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7912755 | Perry et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917889 | Devarakonda et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7925985 | Moore | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8001519 | Conallen et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8010938 | Elaasar | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8051332 | Zakonov et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8091065 | Mir et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8112738 | Pohl et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 20010052108 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020026394 | Savage et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042756 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049622 | Lettich et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073114 | Nicastro et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078046 | Uluakar et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082892 | Raffel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103660 | Cramon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104071 | Charisius et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107826 | Ramachandran et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120553 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133368 | Strutt et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138281 | Cirulli et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138358 | Scheer | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143598 | Scheer | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156695 | Edwards | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161907 | Moon | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184111 | Swanson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188486 | Gil et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198798 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198828 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009754 | Rowley et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058277 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069774 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074271 | Viswanath et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074360 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083762 | Farrah et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084127 | Budhiraja et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130860 | Datta et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182206 | Hendrix et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212602 | Schaller | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233290 | Yang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015367 | Nicastro et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034578 | Oney et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054564 | Fonseca et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093268 | Ramchandani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093381 | Hodges et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111304 | Meka et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111639 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128180 | Abel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133481 | Schwarze et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153359 | Ho et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158506 | Wille | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172510 | Nagashima et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181470 | Grounds | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181538 | Lo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205011 | Northington et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236639 | Candadai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236687 | Tyson-Quah | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243489 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254866 | Crumbach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255152 | Kanamori et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050010501 | Ward, Jr. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033588 | Ruiz et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044015 | Bracken et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060235 | Byrne | Mar 2005 | A2 |
| 20050060408 | McIntyre et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065828 | Kroswek et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108680 | Cheng et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113092 | Coppinger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114829 | Robin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125310 | Hazi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144125 | Erbey et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144226 | Purewal | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156500 | Birecki et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160104 | Meera et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165784 | Gomez et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177435 | Lidow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203760 | Gottumukkala et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203813 | Welter et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209732 | Audimoolam et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209943 | Ballow et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216325 | Ziad et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216507 | Wright | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222896 | Rhyne et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234787 | Wallmeier et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050235020 | Gabelmann et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240592 | Mamou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246250 | Murray | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246482 | Gabelmann et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256775 | Schapler et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256882 | Able et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050257125 | Roesner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050257197 | Herter et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262192 | Mamou et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262453 | Massasso | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050284934 | Ernesti et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288987 | Sattler et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289020 | Bruns et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289079 | Krishan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004802 | Phillips et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053063 | Nagar | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060064344 | Lidow | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074704 | Shukla et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074731 | Green et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080338 | Seubert et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085243 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085294 | Boerner et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085336 | Seubert et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089886 | Wong | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095439 | Buchmann et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129978 | Abrari et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143029 | Akbay et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149574 | Bradley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206352 | Pulianda | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248504 | Hughes | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274720 | Adams et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287939 | Harel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060288350 | Grigorovitch et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070011650 | Hage et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022410 | Ban et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050308 | Latvala et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070075916 | Bump et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094098 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094261 | Phelan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129964 | Helmolt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129984 | von Helmolt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129985 | Helmolt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143164 | Kaila et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150332 | Grichnik et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150387 | Seubert et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150855 | Jeong | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156428 | Brecht-Tillinger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156430 | Kaetker et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156474 | Scherberger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156475 | Berger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156476 | Koegler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156482 | Bagheri | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156489 | Berger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156493 | Tebbe et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156499 | Berger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156500 | Merkel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156538 | Peter et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156550 | Der Emde et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156731 | Ben-Zeev | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162893 | Moosmann et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070164849 | Haeberle et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168303 | Moosmann et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070174068 | Alfandary et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070174145 | Hetzer et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070174811 | Kaetker et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070186209 | Kaetker et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070197877 | Decorte et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198391 | Dreyer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214065 | Kahlon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220046 | Moosmann et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220143 | Lund et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233539 | Suenderhauf et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233541 | Schorr et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233545 | Cala et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233574 | Koegler et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233575 | Berger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233581 | Peter | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233598 | Der Emde et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234282 | Prigge et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239508 | Fazal et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239569 | Lucas et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265860 | Herrmann et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265862 | Freund et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004929 | Raffel et al. | Jan 2008 | A9 |
| 20080017722 | Snyder et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027831 | Gerhardt | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065437 | Dybvig | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120129 | Seubert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147507 | Langhammer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162382 | Clayton et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208707 | Erbey et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215354 | Halverson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263152 | Daniels et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300959 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090037287 | Baitalmal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090037492 | Baitalmal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063112 | Hader et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171716 | Suenderhauf et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171818 | Penning et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172699 | Jungkind et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090189743 | Abraham et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090192858 | Johnson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100070324 | Bock et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070331 | Koegler et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070336 | Koegler et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070391 | Storr et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070395 | Elkeles et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070555 | Duparc et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100100464 | Ellis et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138269 | Cirpus et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20110252395 | Charisius et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 0023874 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 2004083984 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005114381 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Anon,; “Sequenst Corp Bell Atlantic: Bell Atlantic Selects Sequent for Video-on-Demand Program; Sequent Moves to Sieze Opportunity in New Market”; Business Wire; Dec. 6, 1994. |
| Anon.; “State of the Art Reports™ 13,000 MAS 90® for WINDOWS® Shipments in First Nine Months of Availability”; PR Newswire; Apr. 28, 1997. |
| Avanquest's Bookkeeper 2007 Provides All-in-One Solution for Small Business Accounting and Financial Management; New Version of Popular Software Enables Detailed Report Creation and In-House Payroll Processing; PR Newswire; New York; Oct. 3, 2006. |
| Avery, S.; “Buyer's Guide to Software for Purchasing 2000.(Directory)”; Purchasing, vol. 129, No. 1; p. 179; Jul. 13, 2000. |
| “Hudson's Bay Company Realizes Fast ROI with the Oracle E-Business Suite”; PR Newswire; New York; Jan. 15, 2002; p. 1. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2007/002835; Sep. 30, 2008; 8 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,029, filed Jul. 21, 2009; 28 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,040, filed Jul. 24, 2009; 35 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,590, filed Jul. 10, 2009; 32 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,816, filed Jul. 23, 2006; 41 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,851, filed Sep. 2, 2009; 32 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,590, filed Dec. 30, 2009; 31 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,482, filed Jan. 7, 2010; 19 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,772, filed Dec. 9, 2009; 14 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,039, filed Sep. 4, 2009; 36 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,634, filed Sep. 10, 2009; 15 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,383, filed Nov. 12, 2009; 29 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258, filed Nov. 25, 2009; 9 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,085, filed Jun. 25, 2009; 9 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288, filed Aug. 19, 2009; 20 pages. |
| Aleksy, M. et al.; “Interoperability of Java-Based Applications and SAP's Business Framework State of the Art and Desirable Developments”; Proceedings of the International Symposium on Edinburgh, UK; Sep. 1999; IEEE Computer Soc.; pp. 190-200. |
| Arch-int, S. et al.; “Development of Industrial Information Systems on the Web Using Busienss Components”; Computers in Industry; vol. 60; 2003; pp. 231-250. |
| Astudillo, H.; “How Conceptual System Architecture Leads to Business Process”; ACM; 2000; pp. 35-36. |
| Beisiegel, M. et al.; “Service Component Architecture: Building Systems Using a Service Oriented Architecture”; Whitepaper [online]; Nov. 2005; pp. 1-31; http://download.boulder.ibm.com/ibmdl/pub/software/dw/specs/ws-sca/SCA—White—Paper1—09.pdf. |
| Cowan, D.D. et al.; “Application Integration: Constructing Composite Applications from Interactive Components”; Software Practice and Experience; vol. 23, No. 3; Mar. 1993; pp. 255-275. |
| Deimel, A.; “The SAP R/3 Business Framework”; Software—Concepts & Tools; vol. 19, No. 1; 1998; pp. 29-36. |
| Fenner, K.J., et al.; “Classification Framework for Business Components”; System Sciences; Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference; Jan. 2000; pp. 3239-3248. |
| Ferguson D.F. et al.; “Service-Oriented Architecture: Programming Model and Product Architecture”; IBM Systems Journal [online]; vol. 44, No. 4; Dec. 1, 2005; pp. 753-780; http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/journal/sj/444/ferguson.pdf. |
| Gauthier, P. and OSS-J Architecture Board; “OSS through Java (TM) J2EE Design Guidelines”; [online]; Oct. 31, 2001; http://www.ossj.org/downloads/design—guidelines.shtml. |
| Gessford, J.E.; “Object-Oriented System Design”; Emerging Information Technologies for Competitive Advantage and Economic Development; Proceedings of the 1992 Information Resources Management Association International Conference; 1992; pp. 110-118. |
| He, J. et al.; “Component-Based Software Engineering: The Need to Link Methods and Their Theories”; Theoretical Aspects of Computer ICTAC 2005; Second International Colloquium Proceedings (Lecture notes in Computer Science vol. 3722); Oct. 2005; pp. 70-95. |
| Kozacynski, W.; “Architecture Framework for Business Components”; Software Reuse 1998 Proceedings; Fifth International Conferences on Victoria, BC, Canada; Jun. 1998; IEEE Comput. Soc; pp. 300-307. |
| Kythe, D.K.; “The Promise of Distributed Business Components”; Bell Labs Technical Journal; vol. 75, No. 2; Mar./Apr. 1999; pp. 20-28. |
| Linthicum, D.S.; “Chapter 9: RPCs, Messaging, and B2B Application Integration”; B2B Application Integration: E-Business Enable Your Enterprise; 2001; pp. 167-181. |
| Nori A.K. et al.; “Composite Applications: Process Based Application Development”; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; vol. 2444; Aug. 2003; pp. 48-53. |
| Pilhofer, F.; “Writing and Using CORBA Components”; Apr. 2002; http://www.fpx.de/MicoCCM/download/mico-ccm.pdf; 17 pages. |
| Ravichandran, T.; “Special Issue on Component-Based Software Development”;The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems; 2003; pp. 45-46. |
| SAP AG; “Designing Cross Solutions”; SAP XAPPS, [online]; Sep. 2003; pp. 1-2; http://www.sap.com/belux/platform/netweaver/pdf/BWP—CAF.pdf. |
| Schmid, H.A.; “Business Entity Components and Buisness Process Components”; Joop; vol. 12, No. 6; Oct. 1999; pp. 6-10, 12-15. |
| Sharifi, M. et al.; “CORBA Components Collocation Optimization Enhanced with Local ORB-Like Services Support”; On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (2004): COOPIS, ODA and ODBASE. OTM Confederated Conferences COOPIS, DOA and ODBASE 2004; Proceedings Part II (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3291); 2004; pp. 1143-1154. |
| Singh, I. et al.; “Designing Enterprise Applications with the J2EE Platform, Second Edition”; Jun. 15, 2002. |
| Stojanovic, Z. et al.; “Modeling and Design of Service-Oriented Architecture”; Systems, Man and Cybernetics; 2004 IEEE International Conference on The Hague, The Netherlands; Oct. 2004; IEEE, vol. 5; pp. 4147-4152. |
| Thomas, A.; “Enterprise JavaBeans Server Component Model for Java”; [online]; Dec. 1997; http://www.cs.indiana.edu/classes/b649-gann/ejb-white-paper.pdf. |
| Vergil Technology Ltd.; “Vergil Composite Application Builder Suite”; Product Datasheet [online]; 2003; pp. 1-5; http://www.webservicesmall.com.docs/VCAB—datasheet.pdf. |
| Woods, D.; “Packaged Composite Applications: A Liberating Force for the User Interface”; Internet Citation [online]; Oct. 2004; 4 pages; http://www.sapdesignguild.org/editions/edition7/print—compositep—applications.asp. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012625; Apr. 3, 2007; 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012625; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012614; Mar. 16, 2007; 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/US2006/012614; Jul. 1, 2008; 6 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012618; Apr. 3, 2007; 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012618; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012613; May 3, 2007; 6 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012613; Jul. 1, 2008; 6 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012624; Mar. 30, 2007; 9 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012624; Jul. 1, 2008; 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012623; May 7, 2007; 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012623; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012620; Mar. 21, 2007; 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012620; Jul. 1, 2008; 6 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012619; Apr. 19, 2007; 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012619; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012621; Apr. 19, 2007; 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012621; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2007/002835; Aug. 9, 2007; 12 pages. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in European Application No. 06841224.6; May 15, 2009; 8 pages. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in European Application No. 06847009.5; May 15, 2009; 10 pages. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in European Application No. 07007130.3; Dec. 5, 2008; 6 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 07007130.3; Oct. 5, 2007; 6 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,041, filed Apr. 30, 2009; 26 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,612, filed May 11, 2009; 24 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,772, filed Mar. 25, 2009; 12 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,590, filed Jan. 9, 2009; 23 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288, filed Jan. 2, 2009; 18 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288, filed Apr. 15, 2008; 26 pages. |
| “American Software Announces ASP Pricing Model for It's a-Applications Expense Business Solution”; PR Newswire; Mar. 6, 2000; 2 pages. |
| Bastani et al.; “Complex Open System Design by Quasi Agents: Process Oriented Modeling in Agent Based Systems”; ACM SIGSOFT; vol. 34, No. 4; 2009; pp. 1-14. |
| Bastani et al.; “Process Oriented Abstraction of the Complex Evolvable Systems: Problem Model Construction”; ACM SIGSOFT; vol. 33, No. 3; 2008; pp. 1-13. |
| “Cendant Announces Comprehensive Online Travel Booking to Meet President Bush's eTravel Initiative”; PR Newswire; Jul. 9, 2002; 3 pages. |
| Chen, M. and Meixell, M.; “Web Services Enabled Procurement in the Extended Enterprise: An Architectural Design and Implementation”; Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 4, No. 4; 2003; pp. 140-155. |
| Duc et al.; “Uniform Object Modeling Methodology and Reuse of Real Time System Using UML”; EMSOFT '05; Sep. 19-22, 2005; pp. 44-47. |
| Gomaa et al.; “Model Based Software Design and Adaption”; International Workshop on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS '07); IEEE; 2007; 10 pages. |
| Huang, S. et al.; “Computer-Assisted Supply Chain Configuration Based on Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model”; Computers & Industrial Engineering 48; 2005; pp. 377-394. |
| Intuit Canada Ltd.; “ Startup Guide—QuickBooks Basic for Windows, QuickBooks Pro for Windows, QuickBooks Premier for Windows”; 2002; 230 pages. |
| Lambert et al.; “Supply Chain Metrics”; International Journal of Logistics Management; vol. 12, No. 1; 2001; pp. 1-19. |
| Lockamy III, et al.; “Linking SCOR Planning Practices to Supply Chain Performance”; International Journal of Operationgs & Production Management; vol. 24, No. 12; pp. 1192-1218. |
| mySAP™ ERP 2005; Downloaded Mar. 24, 2010 from <http://web.archive.org/web/20061104021205/www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/pdf/BWP—mySAP—ERP—2005.pdf>; 60 pages. |
| “Oracle Expands E-Commerce Offerings with the Acquisition of E-Travel, Inc.”; PR Newswire; Mar. 9, 1999; 3 pages. |
| Ouyang et al.; “From Business Process Models to Process Oriented Software Systems”; ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology; vol. 19, No. 1, Article 2; Aug. 2009; pp. 1-37. |
| Rossi et al.; “Designing and Architecturing Process-aware Web Applications with EPML”; SAC '08; Mar. 16-20, 2008; pp. 2409-2414. |
| “SAP Delivers Next-generation ERP to Customers”; PR Newswire; New York; Mar. 10, 2005; 7 pages. |
| Schultz, G.J.;“Keeping SCOR on Your Supply Chain: Basic Operations Reference Model Updates with the Times”; Information Strategy: The Executive's Journal; Summer 2003; pp. 12-20. |
| Stephens, S.; “Supply Chain Council & Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model Overview”; <http://www.supply-chain.org>; Version 5.0a; Aug. 2001; 29 pages. |
| Stephens, S.; “Supply Chain Operatives Reference Model Version 5.0: A New Tool to Improve Supply Chain Efficiency and Achieve Best Practice”; Information Systems Frontiers 3:4, 2001; pp. 471-476. |
| “Time Management with mySAP™ ERP Human Capital Management”; Downloaded Mar. 24, 2010 from <http://web.archive.org/web/20060105084834/www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/hcm/pdf/HCM—TimeManagement.pdf>; 4 pages. |
| Vogel et al.; “mySAP ERP for Dummies”; Published on Sep. 30, 2005; Downloaded on Mar. 23, 2001 from <http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/9780764599958> 41 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2007/002841; Aug. 16, 2007; 12 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability under Chapter I issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2007/002841; Sep. 30, 2008; 8 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,312, filed Mar. 30, 2010; 23 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,611, filed Mar. 31, 2010; 17 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610, filed Mar. 1, 2010; 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610, filed Jun. 14, 2010; 6 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,383, filed May 12, 2010; 23 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,382, filed Mar. 29, 2010; 28 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,041, filed Mar. 19, 2010; 26 pages. |
| Advisory Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,041, filed Jun. 7, 2010; 3 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259, filed Mar. 29, 2010; 19 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288, filed May 20, 2010; 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258, filed Mar. 31, 2010; 9 pages. |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258, filed May 19, 2010; 8 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,236, filed Mar. 31, 2010; 20 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,039, filed Apr. 14, 2010; 15 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,851, filed May 12, 2010; 15 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,040, filed Apr. 29, 2010; 17 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,612, filed Apr. 1, 2010; 23 pages. |
| Advisory Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,612, filed Jun. 24, 2010; 3 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026, filed Mar. 29, 2010; 17 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,554, filed May 14, 2010; 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534, filed Jun. 24, 2010; 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,354, filed Jun. 25, 2010; 16 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,865, filed Mar. 31, 2010; 16 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,590, filed Jun. 21, 2010; 25 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,634, filed Apr. 2, 2010; 9 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,816, filed Apr. 15, 2010; 27 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,327, filed Apr. 1, 2010; 26 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,085, filed Mar. 23, 2010; 5 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,772, filed Jul. 12, 2010; 18 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259, filed Jul. 6, 2010; 6 pages. |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026, filed Jul. 9, 2010; 4 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,482, filed Jul. 13, 2010; 5 pages. |
| Cascallar, Eduardo et al.; “Assessment in the Evaluation of Self-Regulation as a Process”; Educational Psychology Review; vol. 18, No. 3; Sep. 2006; pp. 297-306. |
| Cool, David W.; “Activity Fund Accounting”; School Business Affairs; vol. 49, No. 6; Jun. 1983; pp. 50-52. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,312 on Sep. 10, 2010; 23 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,611 on Sep. 16, 2010; 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610 on Sep. 23, 2010; 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,382 on Sep. 20, 2010; 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Oct. 15, 2010; 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288; Sep. 24, 2010; 4 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,250 on Oct. 18, 2010; 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on Jul. 28, 2010; 9 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,845; Jul. 15, 2010; 16 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Jul. 26, 2010; 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,554 on Sep. 17, 2010; 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,054 on Sep. 7, 2010; 11 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,557 on Sep. 16, 2010; 16 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534 on Oct. 20, 2010; 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,354 on Oct. 18, 2010; 16 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,865 on Oct. 6, 2010; 6 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,483; Aug. 20, 2010; 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,085; Sep. 13, 2010; 8 pages. |
| Ferscha et al.; “A Light-Weight Component Model for Peer-to-Peer Applications”; IEEE; Mar. 23, 2004. 9pgs. |
| Flissi et al.; “A Component-based Software Infrastructure for Ubiquitous Computing”; IEEE; Jul. 4, 2005. 8pgs. |
| Gould; “Integrating the Manufacturing Enterprise”; Automative Design & Production; 119, 1; ABI/INFORM Global; Jan. 2007; 3 pages. |
| Papazoglou et al; “Service-Oriented Computing Research Road Map”; http://infolab.uvt.nl/pub/papazogloump-2006-96.pdf; Mar. 1, 2006; 29 pages. |
| SAP AG; “SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer: User Guide (SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer release 6.0)”; Document version 1.1; pp. 1-208. Jul. 9, 2004. |
| SAP AG; “Powered by SAP NetWeaver Partner Program—Frequently Asked Questions”; May 2005; 10 pages [online] http://www.lionbridge.com/NR/rdonlyres/4940BE1F/DA46/412E/AB16/F049BD865CA1/0/PBMW FAQ—50070686—en.pdf. |
| Strelich, Thomas P. et al.; “Simulation-Based Transformation with the Service Integration/Interoperation Infrastructure”; Technology Review Journal; Fall/Winter 2005; pp. 99-115. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610 on Dec. 22, 2010; 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 1/322,382 on Jan. 6, 2011; 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Jan. 20, 2011; 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288; Dec. 28, 2010; 4 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on Nov. 16, 2010; 8 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,236 on Oct. 28, 2010; 19 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,845; Dec. 27, 2010; 16 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,040 on Nov. 5, 2010; 33 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Nov. 15, 2010; 7 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,550 on Jan. 12, 2011; 29 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534 on Jan. 31, 2011; 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,354 on Feb. 1, 2011; 16 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,973 on Dec. 7, 2010; 13 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,327 on Nov. 30, 2010; 28 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/404,147 on Nov. 24, 2010; 27 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,462 on Feb. 2, 2011; 11 pages. |
| Bin et al.; “Component Model Optimization for Distributed Real-Time Embedded Software”; IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; Oct. 13, 2004; 6 pages. |
| Cohen; “Optimizer: IBM's Multi-Echelon Inventory System for Managing Service Logistics Interfaces”; vol. 20, No. 1; 1990; pp. 65-82. |
| Cohen et al.; “Saturn's Supply-Chain Innovation: High Value in After Sales Service”; Sloan Management Review; vol. 41, No. 4; 2000; pp. 93-101. |
| Cox et al.; “A Formal Model for Component Based Software”; IEEE; Aug. 7, 2002; 8 pages. |
| Finin et al.; “KQML as an Agent Communication Language”; retrieved on Jul. 26, 2011; pp. 456-463. <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=191322>. |
| Jennings et al.; “Autonomous Agents for Business Process Management”; 2000 Applied Artificial Intelligence; retrieved on Jul. 25, 2011; pp. 145-189. <http:.//citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.58.624&rep=rep1&1type=pdf>. |
| Kalakota et al.; “Readings in Electronic Commerce”; Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.; 1995; ISBN: 0-201-88060-1. |
| Orsburn; “Spares Management Handbook”; McGrawHill; 1991; ISBN: 0-8306-7626-0. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,554 on Feb. 22, 2011; 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,554 on Jun. 27, 2011; 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,550 on May 11, 2011; 20 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,634 on Apr. 29, 2011; 8 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,973 on May 27, 2011; 15 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/404,147 on Aug. 4, 2011; 26 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,462 on May 18, 2011; 6 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,457 on May 26, 2011; 19 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,483 on Mar. 4, 2011; 6 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,232 on May 26, 2011; 20 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,590 on Jun. 23, 2011; 16 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534 on May 16, 2011; 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610 on Mar. 31, 2011; 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,250 on Mar. 2, 2011; 13 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,250 on Jun. 24, 2011; 5 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on Jun. 28, 2011; 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,845; Apr. 8, 2011; 8 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,040 on Jul. 26, 2011; 34 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Mar. 3, 2011; 6 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,417 on Apr. 7, 2011; 32 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,530 on Apr. 29, 2011; 11 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,405 on Apr. 27, 2011; 15 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,557 on Mar. 4, 2011; 19 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,489 on May 13, 2011; 15 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,393 on Apr. 15, 2011; 12 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,075 on Aug. 4, 2011; 45 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,865 on Jun. 24, 2011; 8 pages. |
| Anonymous; “Mastering Management”, Motor Age, vol. 25, No. 10; Oct. 2006; pp. 1-3. |
| Gerin et al.; “Flexible and Executable Hardware/Software Interface Modeling for Multiprocessor SOC Design Using SystemC”; IEEE; 2007; pp. 390-395. |
| Hahn; “A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Multi-Agent Systems”; ACM AAMAS; 2008; pp. 233-240. |
| Hu; “A Co-Design Modeling Approach for Computer Network Systems”; IEEE; 2007; pp. 685-693. |
| Kremic, Tibor; “Outsourcing Decision Support: A Survey of Benefits, Risks, and Decision Factor”; Supply Chain Management; V. 11; 2006; pp. 467-482. |
| Sarjoughian et al.; “CoSMOs: A Visual Environment for Component Based Modeling, Experimental Design and Simulation”; ACM; 2009; pp. 1-9. |
| Schaub, Thomas et al.; “Enterprise Management Application Providing Availability Control Checks on Revenue Budgets”; Aerospace & High Technology, ANTE: Abstracts in New Technologies and Engineering; Metdex, Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts; Date Unknown, p. 1. |
| Veseovi, Marcos and Hagmann, Christian; “Rules Engine for Enterprise System”; Areospace & High Technology, ANTE: Abstracts in New Technologies and Engineering; Metadex, Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts; Date Unknown; p. 1. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,146 on Sep. 6, 2011; 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,327 on Sep. 28, 2011; 31 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,479 on Oct. 27, 2011; 24 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/332,965 on Oct. 11, 2011; 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance in issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,462 on Sep. 2, 2011; 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,462 on Dec. 12, 2011; 6 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,289 on Oct. 27, 2011; 15 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,457 on Novernber 3, 2011; 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,232 on Nov. 2, 2011; 16 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,701 on Nov. 8, 2011; 20 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,087 on Aug. 18, 2011; 42 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,382 on Jul. 25, 2011; 5 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,383 on May 12, 2010; 23 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,383 on Nov. 12, 2009; 23 pages. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,236 on Nov. 10, 2011; 19 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Aug. 5, 2011; 7 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288 on Oct. 17, 2011; 38 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,250 on Dec. 7, 2011; 6 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,252 on Nov. 10, 2011; 18 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,851 on Sep. 2, 2011; 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,845; Nov. 13, 2011; 9 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026; Jul. 21 2009; 28 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Jul. 20, 2011; 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Nov. 4, 2011; 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,520 on Nov. 10, 2011; 22 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,417 on Sep. 14, 2011; 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,054 on Aug. 2, 2011; 5 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,458 on Oct. 12, 2011; 19 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,489 on Sep. 28, 2011; 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,393 on Nov. 9, 2011; 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,354 on Aug. 9, 2011; 13 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,387 on Sep. 8, 2011; 14 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,890 on Jul. 15, 2011; 7 pages. |
| “IDe Partners with Journyx to Offer Customers Best-in-Class Time Management Solution”; PR Newswire; Mar. 8, 2005; Business Dateline. |
| Meseroll, Robert; “Data Mining Navy Flight”; IEEE Autotestcom 2007; Sep. 2007; pp. 476-481. |
| “Trakware Systems Inc. Expands Management Team: Leading To-Order Software Provider Adds Experienced Global VP Sales and Marketing to its World-Class Team”; Canada NewsWire; Apr. 9, 2008. |
| Trappey, Amy; “Design and Analysis of a Rule Based Knowledge”; International Journal of Manufacturing Tech; Dec. 2007; 35,3-4:385-93. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,550 on Jan. 9, 2012; 11 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,146 on Feb. 2, 2012; 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,634 on Jan. 25, 2012; 5 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,479 on May 7, 2012; 26 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/332,965 on Jun. 11, 2012; 21 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,462 on Apr. 5, 2012; 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,289 on Feb. 15, 2012; 11 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,590 on Dec. 28, 2011; 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,701 on Apr. 6, 2012; 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,087 on Mar. 30, 2012; 30 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534 won Dec. 28, 2011; 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Mar. 15, 2012; 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on Feb. 3, 2012; 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,851 on Mar. 1, 2012; 9 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Feb. 23, 2012; 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,458 on May 1, 2012; 17 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,489 on Feb. 6, 2012; 9 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,387 on Apr. 12, 2012; 13 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,737 on Mar. 26, 2012; 14 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,075 on Mar. 22, 2012; 25 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070156499 A1 | Jul 2007 | US |
