In centrally heated or cooled buildings, fresh air or “makeup air” is typically added continuously to the total volume of circulated air, resulting in some previously heated or cooled air being exhausted from the building space. This can result in an undesirable loss of energy and humidity from the building. Heat exchangers are commonly used in the exhaust air and makeup airflow paths of these systems to recover some of the energy from the exhaust air and to induce warmer makeup air during heating processes and cooler makeup air during cooling processes.
Materials used for heat exchangers commonly include metal foils and sheets, plastic films, paper sheets, and the like. Good heat exchange is generally possible with these materials, but significant moisture exchange cannot easily be performed. Desiccants, or moisture adsorbing materials, are occasionally employed to transfer moisture. With this method, the desiccant merely holds the moisture. To effectively transfer moisture between gas streams, the desiccant must be relocated from the gas stream of higher moisture content to the gas stream of lower moisture content, requiring an additional input of mechanical energy. With many desiccant materials, satisfactory performance can be achieved only with the input of additional thermal energy to induce the desiccant to desorb the accumulated moisture.
Heat and moisture exchange are both possible with an exchange film made of paper. However, water absorbed by the paper from condensation, rain, or moisture present in the air can lead to corrosion, deformation, and mildew growth, and, hence, deterioration of the paper exchange film.
The various types of heat and moisture exchangers in common usage are generally contained within an opaque metal housing and located at or near the building air-handling units in the mechanical room, basement, or rooftop of the building. The nature of moisture exchange requires a very large surface area in contact with the gas stream, and, consequently, so-called total heat exchangers are often very large in size when compared to heat-only exchangers. A larger exchanger in the conventional locations requires additional mechanical room space and/or additional load-bearing capacity of the roof in the case of a roof-top unit.
Porous polymeric or ceramic films are capable of transferring both heat and moisture when interposed between air streams of differing energy and moisture states. A system for heat and moisture exchange employing a porous membrane is described in Japanese Laid-Open Patent Application No. 54-145048. A study of heat and moisture transfer through a porous membrane is given in Asaeda, M., L. D. Du, and K. Ikeda. “Experimental Studies of Dehumidification of Air by an Improved Ceramic Membrane,” Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1986, Vol. 19, No. 3. A disadvantage of such porous composite film is that it also permits the exchange of substantial amounts of air between the gas streams, as well as particles, cigarette smoke, cooking odors, harmful fumes, and the like. With respect to building indoor air quality, this is undesirable. In order to prevent this contamination of make-up air, the pore volume of a porous film is preferably no more than about 15%, which is difficult and expensive to achieve uniformly. Furthermore, a porous film made to a thickness of 5 to 40 micrometers in order to improve heat exchange efficiency tears easily and is difficult to handle.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,178,966 to Breshears addressed the shortcomings described above by describing an improved apparatus for enabling heat and moisture exchange between makeup and exhaust air streams in the heating and air conditioning system of a structure. The apparatus included a rigid frame for holding a pair of light transmitting panes, the frame and panes collectively defining an interior cavity within the apparatus. The apparatus could be integrated into the exterior walls of a building. The light transmitting properties of the panes allow incident solar radiation to permeate the panels, creating a more natural ambient environment in the interior of the structure adjacent with the panel, as well as raising the temperature of the air stream and the water vapor permeable barrier to further enhance the exchange of moisture through the barrier.
In the prior art Breshears apparatus, a water-vapor-permeable barrier was provided within the apparatus, to divide the interior of the apparatus into sub-channels for receiving makeup and exhaust air streams, respectively. The barrier was described as a composite film made of porous polymeric membrane having applied thereto a water-vapor-permeable polymeric material so as to form a non-porous barrier to block the flow of air and other gas.
Despite overcoming some of the shortcomings of preexisting systems, the prior art Breshears apparatus was limited in some ways. For example, the disclosed apparatus was limited to transparent structures configured to be integrated into the exterior of a building. Furthermore, the polymeric membranes described by Breshears were limited to certain particular membrane materials.
The present teachings relate to improved methods and apparatus for recovering energy and/or moisture as air is added to and exhausted from an enclosed space. These teachings may be combined, optionally, with apparatus, methods, or components thereof described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,178,966 to Breshears. However, the present teachings expand upon the prior art teachings by disclosing novel improvements such as an exchanger incorporated into an opaque exterior building element. These and other aspects of the present teachings are described in detail in the sections below.
This description discusses some of the basic features of heat and moisture exchangers according to aspects of the present teachings, and focuses particularly on incorporating exchangers into various external building elements, such as walls, foundations, roofs, and slab floors configured to divide an enclosed space from the ambient exterior and collectively referred to as a building enclosure system. See
In the embodiment of
Barrier 18, which divides interior channel 16 into sub-channels 20 and 22, is generally permeable to water vapor and substantially impermeable to the constituent gases of air, which principally include nitrogen and oxygen. Various types of barriers may be suitable for use with the present teachings, including microporous polymeric membranes with appropriate characteristics. One particularly suitable type of polymeric membrane is described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0151447 to Merkel, which is hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure for all purposes.
In a manner described in more detail below, source and exhaust gas streams, respectively denoted throughout the drawings as gas stream A and gas stream B, are directed through adjacent sub-channels 20 and 22 within exchanger 10. Due to the proximity of the air streams, heat may be conducted from the hotter gas stream through barrier 18 and into the cooler gas stream, and moisture may be transported from the gas stream of higher moisture content through barrier 18 and into the gas stream of lower moisture content. Various barrier configurations and resulting geometries of sub-channels may be chosen depending on the desired heat transfer, moisture transfer, and pressure drop characteristics. The following paragraphs include descriptions of various such arrangements, with barriers and sub-channels that function in a manner similar to those described above.
Similar arrangements having odd numbers of barriers with corresponding even numbers of sub-channels are possible, such as disposing five barriers within channel 86 to form six sub-channels evenly divided between gas stream A and gas stream B. Alternatively, some examples may have any number of barriers forming any corresponding number of sub-channels, divided unevenly between gas streams A and B. For example, four barriers may be used to form five sub-channels, with three devoted to gas stream A and two to gas stream B. In yet other examples, the barrier arrangements of exchangers 40 and 80 may be combined to produce parallel pleated or corrugated barriers, or even alternating corrugated and flat barriers, in any case forming sub-channels with corresponding shapes.
For example,
The disclosure set forth herein encompasses multiple distinct inventions with independent utility. While each of these inventions has been disclosed in its preferred form, the specific embodiments thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein are not to be considered in a limiting sense as numerous variations are possible. Each example defines an embodiment disclosed in the foregoing disclosure, but any one example does not necessarily encompass all features or combinations that may be eventually claimed. Where the description recites “a” or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof, such description includes one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. Further, ordinal indicators, such as first, second or third, for identified elements are used to distinguish between the elements, and do not indicate a required or limited number of such elements, and do not indicate a particular position or order of such elements unless otherwise specifically stated.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/185,435, filed Jul. 18, 2011, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application also incorporates by reference in its entirety for all purposes the following: U.S. Pat. No. 6,178,966, issued Jan. 30, 2001 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0151447 to Merkel, published Jul. 5, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
246626 | Morse | Sep 1881 | A |
549765 | Calver | Nov 1895 | A |
2288465 | Knudsen | Jun 1942 | A |
2595905 | Telkes | May 1952 | A |
3666007 | Yoshino et al. | May 1972 | A |
3720025 | Eichman | Mar 1973 | A |
3785931 | Coffey et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3860055 | Wild | Jan 1975 | A |
3866672 | Rich et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3923461 | Barden | Dec 1975 | A |
3925212 | Tchernev | Dec 1975 | A |
3925945 | White | Dec 1975 | A |
3926561 | Lucero | Dec 1975 | A |
3955555 | Boström | May 1976 | A |
3977466 | Johansson | Aug 1976 | A |
3981294 | Deminet et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4019868 | Sebacher et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4031680 | Stoakes | Jun 1977 | A |
4040804 | Harrison | Aug 1977 | A |
4050443 | Peck et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4068652 | Worthington | Jan 1978 | A |
4159707 | Miquel | Jul 1979 | A |
4173253 | Wiegand | Nov 1979 | A |
4182406 | Holbrook et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4183398 | Ehrke | Jan 1980 | A |
4232731 | Kaplow et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4259401 | Chahroudi et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4269171 | McArthur | May 1981 | A |
4270516 | Hopper et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4285332 | McHugh | Aug 1981 | A |
4301787 | Rice | Nov 1981 | A |
4331066 | Schmidlin | May 1982 | A |
4338996 | Frank | Jul 1982 | A |
4369765 | McDaniel | Jan 1983 | A |
4382436 | Hager | May 1983 | A |
4393861 | Beard et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4393961 | Boon | Jul 1983 | A |
4412528 | Elzinga, Jr. | Nov 1983 | A |
4418378 | Johnson | Nov 1983 | A |
4436084 | Carlston et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4469087 | Cameron | Sep 1984 | A |
4478210 | Sieradski | Oct 1984 | A |
4577619 | Howe, Jr. | Mar 1986 | A |
4582129 | Yano et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4609039 | Fushiki et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4658806 | Boozer | Apr 1987 | A |
4691763 | Kennedy | Sep 1987 | A |
4867134 | O'Brien | Sep 1989 | A |
4872503 | Marriner | Oct 1989 | A |
4903503 | Meckler | Feb 1990 | A |
4913818 | Van Wijk et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4932982 | Hayes | Jun 1990 | A |
4950314 | Yamada et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5069272 | Chagnot | Dec 1991 | A |
5082173 | Poehlman et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5181387 | Meckler | Jan 1993 | A |
5182921 | Yan | Feb 1993 | A |
5240480 | Thorogood et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5551991 | Avero | Sep 1996 | A |
5569633 | Carolan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5617913 | DeGregoria et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5681368 | Rahimzadeh | Oct 1997 | A |
5733435 | Prasad et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5788748 | Mazanec et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5855972 | Kaeding | Jan 1999 | A |
5976220 | Braun et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6054229 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059862 | Mizobe et al. | May 2000 | A |
6126723 | Drost et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145588 | Martin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6178966 | Breshears | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6273180 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6319115 | Shingaki | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6361588 | Moratalla | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6401428 | Glover et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413298 | Wnek et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6635104 | Komkova et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6866701 | Meirav | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7013950 | Steneby et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7036560 | Rylewski | May 2006 | B1 |
7604689 | Siverklev | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8496732 | Culp et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8500848 | Claridge et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8641806 | Claridge et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8685144 | Claridge et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8685145 | Claridge et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010018962 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020104439 | Komkova et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040226685 | Gagnon et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050072303 | Weidenmann | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070125111 | Xiao | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151447 | Merkel | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080230206 | Lestage et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080283217 | Gagnon et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090025710 | Hogan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110146941 | Benoit et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120012290 | Breshears | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120118145 | Claridge et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120118146 | Claridge et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120118147 | Claridge et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120118155 | Claridge et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130020049 | Breshears | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130126123 | Breshears | May 2013 | A1 |
20130312929 | Breshears | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140034268 | Breshears | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1113789 | Dec 1981 | CA |
0661502 | Jul 1995 | EP |
2081877 | Feb 1982 | GB |
54-145048 | Nov 1979 | JP |
56-30555 | Mar 1981 | JP |
59-1989 | Jan 1984 | JP |
9-318099 | Dec 1997 | JP |
2005090873 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2008106973 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2013012639 | Jan 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nov. 26, 2014, Office action from US Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,439, which is another application of John E. Breshears. |
Sep. 27, 2012, International Search Report of the International Searching Authority from the U.S. Receiving Office, in PCT/US2012/046299, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Sep. 27, 2012, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from the U.S. Receiving Office, in PCT/US2012/046299, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Jul. 16, 2013, Office action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,218, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Dec. 5, 2013, Office action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/747,218, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Dec. 19, 2013, First Action Pilot Program Pre-Interview Communication from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,439, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Jan. 2, 2014, First Action Pilot Program Pre-Interview Communication from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,435, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Jan. 21, 2014, International Preliminary Report on Patentability from the International Bureau of WIPO, in PCT/US2012/046299, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Apr. 1, 2014, Office action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,439, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Apr. 1, 2014, Office action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,435, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Aug. 1, 2014, Office action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,439, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Aug. 1, 2014, Office action from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,435, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Kunzel, Hartwig M., Simultaneous Heat and Moisture Transport in Building Components, One- and two-dimensional calculation using simple parameters, Frauhofer Institute of Building Physics, pp. 1-65. |
Asaeda et al., “Experimental Studies of Dehumidification of Air by an Improved Ceramic Membrane”, Presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Society of Chemical Engineers, Yokohama, Japan, Mar. 1985, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, pp. 238-240. |
Jan. 30, 2015, Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/942,376, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Jul. 9, 2015, First Action Interview Pilot Program Pre-Interview Communication from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/053,921, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Sep. 17, 2015, Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 14/053,921, which is another application of applicant John E. Breshears. |
Aug. 6, 2015, Office action from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People'S Republic of China, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280045105.8, which shares the same priority as this U.S. application. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150034283 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13185435 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 14518451 | US |