The present invention is directed to a forced entry system, and more particularly, to an architectural mesh forced entry system configured to resist forced entry into framed openings including doors and windows.
One of the most common ways of gaining access to a locked premises is through a forced entry. Forced entry is generally defined as being an unauthorized entry accomplished by the use of force upon the physical components of the premises, generally doors, windows, and wall panels of any type, louvers, escape hatches and protective window grilles. With respect to doors, such forced entry usually takes the form of battering on the door adjacent to the door lock assembly, or adjacent to the center hinge of the door, usually applied by an intruder with one or more solid kicks delivered to the door. Since most entry doors are fabricated from soft wood, as are the strike and hinge jambs, they are not constructed to withstand such force. The bolt of the lock assembly, or the door, or the strike jamb split and break apart and thus give the intruder access to the premises. With respect to a window, attempts to force an entry may be made by breaking the glass panel of the window and/or cutting a hole in a window grille sufficiently large, not necessarily for a person to gain entry, but large enough for a person to place an incendiary device or explosive within the premises.
It would be desirable to have available options to prevent such unauthorized entry while still maintaining an aesthetically pleasing appearance.
A forced entry system for a framed opening comprising a bracket assembly secured to the framed opening; a mounting tube including a saddle, said saddle being secured to said bracket assembly; and a mesh panel secured by the mounting tube to cover the framed opening.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description, in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:
Referring to
As shown in
Referring also to
Each mounting tube 30 further comprises a tube saddle 32 which allows the mesh panel 40 to be attached to the base plate 22 of the bracket assembly 20. The saddles 32 are welded onto the mounting tubes 30 and fit onto the tension stud 24 and guide rods 26 preferably provided on the base plate 22. The saddles 32 can be fabricated from ¼″ T316 or T304 stainless steel, or the like. Cover plates (not shown) also made from stainless steel can be welded to the front side of the saddles to prevent tools from being inserted and the tension screws being deliberately loosened by a would-be intruder.
The mesh panel 40 shown in
The horizontal crimp rods 44 are inserted into the woven spirals 42 to join the individual spirals together into a panel 40. The ends of the crimp rods are welded to make the assembly permanent. The mesh panel 40 is tensioned by tightening the lock nut 25 on the tension screw 24 during installation, and the spirals thus nest in the crimp rod grooves to maintain the desired taught panel shape.
The mesh panel 40′ shown in
The round wire pattern of mesh shown in
One of the advantages of architectural mesh forced entry system 10, particularly when used behind the glass of a window, is its ability to allow light and ventilation into open spaces and that it can be removed for cleaning, if necessary.
The above-described architectural mesh forced entry system 10 is designed to meet the standard established by the Department of State to resist forced entry into doors and windows as outlined in SD-STD-01.01, Revision G dated Apr. 30, 1993, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The architectural mesh forced entry system 10 is designed to meet or exceed the 5 minute protection level outlined in said above-noted standard. More particularly, in testing the forced entry system 10, two men supplied with crowbars, sledge hammers and wire cutters failed within 5 minutes to break down the mesh forced entry system 10 or cut a hole large enough in the mesh panel 40 to place a “package” within the premises. The forced entry system 10 is also designed for low level blast mitigation in the event that a package, such as an explosive device, is detonated in the vicinity thereof.
While the present invention has been described with respect to a particular embodiment of the present invention, this is by way of illustration for purposes of disclosure rather than to confine the invention to any specific arrangement as there are various alterations, changes, deviations, eliminations, substitutions, omissions and departures which may be made in the particular embodiment shown and described without departing from the scope of the claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/511,384, filed Jul. 25, 2011, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1567446 | McClure | Dec 1925 | A |
2498716 | Seide | Feb 1950 | A |
3126332 | Salete | Mar 1964 | A |
4800947 | Loomis | Jan 1989 | A |
4922988 | Loomis | May 1990 | A |
5832666 | Flack et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6057029 | Demestre et al. | May 2000 | A |
6718705 | Emek | Apr 2004 | B2 |
8156698 | Colton et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8191606 | Edlin | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8365492 | Frest et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8365803 | Schoenheit et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20050090338 | Scarpa, III | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060075699 | Messick et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090862 | Messick, Jr. | May 2006 | A1 |
20080190278 | Martin | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009011853 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated Sep. 6, 2013 for Application No. 12177671.0. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130186264 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61511384 | Jul 2011 | US |