The present invention relates to apparatus and techniques for communications between integrated circuit chips (ICs).
Electronic systems can include multiple ICs. Communications between those ICs can be conducted directly or indirectly. Direct communication can involve two ICs directly exchanging information. Indirect communication can involve two ICs indirectly exchanging information by way of a controller IC. mSilica Inc., the assignee of the present invention designs and develops electrical systems in which inter-chip communication is performed. For example, mSilica Inc. is the assignee of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/942,239 entitled “Apparatus and Technique for Modular Electronics Display Control,” which discloses a novel modular approach for backlight control of a liquid crystal display. According to that approach, several driver ICs share the workload of the system controller and are used to control the LED strings of the backlighting system. Each driver IC controls a portion of the strings. The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/942,239 is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In such systems, real time communication among the ICs is desirable. The present invention provides novel architecture and techniques for inter-chip communications that are efficient, easy to implement, and can be done in real time.
The present invention involves an electrical system in which an analog signal channel passes through various integrated circuit chips (ICs). The channel can carry one or more analog signals. Each IC can modify the signal(s) passing through it and pass it on to another IC or system component. The channel can be programmable. Each IC can include a comparator or a multiplexor to receive the channel signal from another IC or system component and to modify the received signal before transmitting it to another IC or system component. The comparator or the multiplexor can be programmable and can be selectively configured to compare the incoming signal from the channel with a variety of other signals and thresholds, or to simply act as a flow through gate and allow the signal to pass without any modification. The comparison can determine the output of the comparator. The operation and programming of the comparators, the multiplexors and the channel can be centrally controlled by a system controller, can be independently controlled by the ICs, or a combination thereof.
The above and other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
In one embodiment, the signal adjustment blocks 201-205 can compare the analog signal received from the signal channel 120 with multiple signals and adjust the level of the analog signal based on the comparison. In one embodiment, the signal adjustment blocks 201-205 can be programmable. The signal adjustment blocks 201-205 can be implemented in hardware, software or firmware. In one embodiment, the signal adjustment blocks 201-205 can include multiplexors. In one embodiment, the signal adjustment blocks 201-205 include operational amplifiers. In one embodiment, the signal adjustment blocks 201-205 include comparators. In one embodiment, some or all the signal adjustment blocks 201-205 can have the same or similar structure and functionality.
One of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the comparator 310 can include more than two inputs and that the level of the signal transmitted by the signal channel 120 can be adjusted based on the result of the comparison of those inputs. One of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the comparator 310 can be a programmable device and can be programmed to output a signal that is based on the comparison and that the level of the output signal can be different from the level of either of the input signals of the comparator 310. In one embodiment, the comparator 310 can be selectively programmed to not perform the comparison and act as a flow through gate to pass on the signal on the signal channel 120 without any adjustment.
In one embodiment, the comparator 310 can be replaced with a multiplexor. The multiplexor can multiplex its inputs including the signal on the signal channel 120 and transmit them to another chip or system component. In one embodiment, all the signals multiplexed by the multiplexors of all the ICs 1-n are received by a destination IC or a system component. The destination IC or system component can then analyze all the signals and, for example, determine the signal having the lowest signal level and/or the lowest signal level of the multiplexed signals.
The present invention provides a unique and elegant technique in which an analog channel interconnects multiple chips. A comparison can be progressively made between analog output signals of sequential chips of the daisy chain and either the higher or the lower of the two signals selected for comparison with the output of the next chip in the daisy chain. In this manner, the ultimate highest or the lowest of all output signals generated by all the chips in the daisy chain is determined. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the techniques, structures and methods of the present invention discussed above are exemplary. The present invention can be implemented in various embodiments without deviating from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5315214 | Lesea | May 1994 | A |
5722040 | Bjerede et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5744986 | Yamada et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6172556 | Prentice | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6593709 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6633138 | Shannon et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7151520 | Maki | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7339471 | Chan et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7583035 | Shteynberg et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8044919 | Song et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8072444 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8144106 | Kim | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20020145041 | Muthu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040105264 | Spero | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050184708 | Pipen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060022214 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033536 | Thelen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060214603 | Oh et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070040512 | Jungwirth et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070075958 | Kim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091067 | Elsheimer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070139319 | Nishida et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070273299 | Miskin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285133 | Dickman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080042045 | Miyazawa | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080084222 | Yen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080170012 | S et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080191631 | Archenhold et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224629 | Melanson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080278097 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309611 | Yang | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090079362 | Shteynberg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090128045 | Szczeszynski et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090179589 | Buhler et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090184904 | S. et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090224736 | Santo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090231247 | Dhayagude et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090267652 | Santo et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090315467 | Schindler et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013395 | Archibald et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100188443 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100237786 | Santo et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201114961 | Sep 2008 | CN |
2160283 | Jun 1990 | JP |
2003131620 | May 2003 | JP |
2003288045 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004271759 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2006185942 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2007013530 | Jan 2007 | JP |
WO2009016588 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/053777 dated Nov. 5, 2009, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/048505 dated Jul. 31, 2009, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/048769 dated Jan. 1, 2009, 10 pages. |
JP Office Action; Sep. 18, 2012; Japan; 2010-550742; 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/035334 dated Apr. 28, 2009, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability; BAI; Jul. 12, 2012; World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (International Bureau of); 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; Pitard /Henderson; Jul. 6, 2011; World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (International Bureau of); PCT/US2010/061011; 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090230882 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |