The present invention relates to a soft switching power converter, and more particularly to ARCP (Auxiliary Resonant Commuted Pole) power converters.
A dc-ac or ac-dc converter, also known as an inverter or a rectifier respectively, converts power from dc to ac or ac to do system at desired voltages and frequencies. The inverter therefore can be operated as an adjustable-frequency voltage source. The dc power input to the inverter may be obtained from an existing power supply network through a rectifier or from a battery, fuel cell, photovoltaic array, etc. The filter capacitor(s) across the dc terminals of the inverter provides a fairly constant dc-link voltage. A configuration of having an ac to de rectifier and de to ac inverter may be called a dc-link converter.
Pulse-width-modulation (PWM) inverters are widely used in motor drives, uninterruptible power supplies (UPSs), and utility interfaces. Inverter switching components may be simple electronic switches, usually consisting of three terminals or pins, in which the presence of a voltage or current in one terminal allows current to flow between the other two terminals. The inverter switches operate in a switch mode, meaning that that they are controlled to transition from a blocking state (OFF state) to a conducting state (ON state), and vice-versa, by providing control pulses at a high switching frequency fs. In a PWM modulation scheme, the width of control pulses provided to the control inputs of the switching devices is varied in proportion to the amplitude and frequency of a (e.g., sinusoidal) reference signal. The frequency of the reference signal determines the output frequency fo of the inverter on the AC side. In the blocking state, the voltage drop across the switch is at a maximum, while the current through the switch, however, due to the blocking state, is ideally zero. In the conductive state, the current that flows through the switch is at a maximum, but the voltage drop across the switch is minimal, ideally zero. However, electronic switching devices have a finite switching time, i.e. they cannot instantly switch from the conductive to the blocking state and vice versa. During this transition interval (commutation), the switch neither completely blocks nor fully conducts, and therefore, neither the voltage across the switch nor the current through the switch is zero. In other words, there is a considerable overlap between voltage and current waveforms. This simultaneous presence of voltage across the switch and current through it means that, during this overlapping period, power is being dissipated within the device. This power loss, called “a switching loss”, reduces efficiency of the inverter, and when dissipated in the switch causes a major thermal stress on the switching device. The ability of a switching device to remove heat is limited. As the heat load increases, temperature rises which, in turn, degrades performance.
Conventional PWM inverters are operated under such “hard switching” conditions, where the voltages across the switches and currents through the switches are changed abruptly from high values to zero and vice versa at a high switching frequency fs, with an overlap between the voltage and current waveforms, causing switching losses and generating a substantial amount of electromagnetic interference. The switching losses are proportional to the switching frequency fs and thereby limit the maximum switching frequency. A high level of EMI is caused due to a wide spectrum of harmonics contained in rectangular PWM waveforms.
Soft-switching techniques aim to eliminate the switching losses by forcing a zero-voltage or a zero-current condition on the switch during a switching event. Switching at zero-voltage crossing is called zero-voltage switching (ZVS) whereas switching at zero-current crossing is called zero-current switching (ZCS). While soft-switching has been successfully applied for simpler applications such as DC-DC converters, it has been difficult to apply to general-purpose inverters (such as to drive AC motors). The auxiliary resonant commutated pole (ARCP) topology is one of the most promising approaches for soft-switching inverters and has distinct potential benefits in a motor drive application. The output voltage wave form during commutation can be shaped to be motor friendly via suitable resonant circuit parameter selections. The stress in motor insulation and bearings is thus reduced. The basic configuration and operation of ARCP is described, for example, an article “The auxiliary resonant commutated pole converter”, IEEE-IAS Conference Proceedings 1990, pp. 1228-35, and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,047,913 by R. W. De Doncker et al. The ARCP inverter comprises series-connected dc-link capacitances between the negative (N) and the positive (P) dc-link rails of the dc-link side of the inverter. At a center tap, called a neutral point (NP), of capacitances there is provided a neutral point voltage or potential UNP. Each main switching device of the inverter is associated with an antiparallel diode and a resonant capacitor. Further, an auxiliary circuit comprising a resonant inductor and auxiliary switching device(s) is connected between the neutral point and a phase output. The difference between an ARCP inverter and a hard-switched inverter lies in the commutation between states. In the ARCP commutation is accomplished through the auxiliary circuitry in a finite amount of time. The auxiliary circuit is only used when the output is required to commutate from one voltage rail to the other. In order to ensure that the inverter output voltage at least reaches the positive and negative dc rail voltages during each resonant commutation cycle, a boost current is added to the resonant current by appropriately controlling the conduction times of the auxiliary switching devices and the main switching devices. The amount of boost current is controlled by applying a known voltage to a known resonant inductance for a known boosting time. A predetermined boost current level in the resonator inductor adds sufficient energy to the resonant operation to ensure that the output voltage attempts to overshoot the respective converter antiparallel diode and clamping the output voltage to the respective rail voltage. Ideally, the main switches turn on and off in a zero-voltage condition, and the auxiliary switch(es) in zero-current condition, which reduce the occurring switching losses. Consequently, the switching frequency can be increased without a considerable loss penalty. Low acoustic noise of such a drive is appreciated in many applications. High switching frequency also enables higher fundamental output frequencies with low distortion, making the ARCP topology attractive for high-speed drive applications.
The resonant branch of ARCPI topology is prone to excess voltage oscillation and potential overvoltage across the auxiliary switches, which is mainly due to reverse recovery current of auxiliary switches and the LC resonance circuit. One solution has been to use a saturable inductor in series with the conventional core or core-less resonant inductor. The saturable inductor is designed to provide high inductance for very low levels of current, but almost zero inductance above the saturation current. In theory, the boost current increases linearly. In practice, boost current starts to increase slowly and gradually, because saturable inductor slows down the current rise until full saturation current is achieved at saturation instant. If the boost time is calculated theoretically assuming a linearly increasing boost current, the achieved boost current in practice is only a fraction of the optimal and zero voltage switching condition is not achieved. A challenge with the saturable core inductor is that the inductance is non-linear and varies depending on, for example, core material permeability, operating temperature and frequency. Therefore, it is difficult to calculate a correct boost time and control the boost current when a saturable core inductor is used.
An object of the present invention to provide an ARCP converter and control thereof which alleviate or overcome the above problems. The objects of the invention are achieved by an ARCP converter and control according to the independent claims. Embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the dependent claims.
An aspect of the invention is a power converter system, comprising an auxiliary resonant commutated pole (ARCP) converter leg, particularly an ARCP half-bridge, having a series connection of a saturable-core inductor and at least one bi-directional auxiliary switch connected to a dc-link neutral point,
In an embodiment, the pre-determined boost period is calculated based on an inductance of a resonant inductor connected in series with the saturable-core inductor, optionally taking into account a saturated inductance of the saturable-core inductor.
In an embodiment, the saturable-core inductor comprises a primary winding and a secondary winding, the auxiliary current flowing through the primary winding, and the saturation instant detector is connected to the secondary winding and configured to detect the saturation instant based on a voltage induced in the secondary winding.
In an embodiment, the saturation instant detector is connected to the dc-link neutral point and configured to detect the saturation instant based on a voltage of the dc-link neutral point.
In an embodiment, the saturation instant detector comprises an auxiliary current sensing unit to sense a rapid change in the auxiliary current. In an embodiment, the auxiliary current sensing unit comprises a Hall sensor or a Rogowski coil.
In an embodiment, the ARCP converter leg further comprises:
In an embodiment, the power converter system comprises a plurality of ARCP converter legs.
In the following the invention will be described in greater detail by means of preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
A dc-ac or ac-dc converter, also known as an inverter or a rectifier respectively, converts power from dc to ac or ac to dc power system at desired voltages and frequencies. Further, a dc-dc converter, such as a dc chopper, converts power from dc to dc power system. Although embodiments are described using inverters and inverter systems as examples, the invention is similarly applicable to rectifiers and rectifier systems as well as dc-dc converters. Inverter and rectifier can be exactly similar in structure and the control operations can be similar, the difference being the direction of a power flow. When a converter operates as an inverter (dc/ac converter), it converts the power from a dc system to an ac system, i.e., the ac side of the converter is referred as an output side and the dc side is considered as an input side. When a converter operates as a rectifier (ac/dc converter), it converts power from an ac system to a dc system, i.e., the ac side of the converter is considered as an input side and the dc side is considered as an output side. Further, connecting ac/dc and dc/dc converters in back-to-back configuration, i.e. dc-sides connected together, between two ac systems, one of the converters is operating in rectifier mode and the other in inverter mode, depending on the power flow direction. Operation modes of the converters may vary during the operation, as power flow may vary.
It shall be appreciated that the modulation control according to embodiments of the invention is universally applicable to any type of ARCP inverters and their derivates and modifications regardless the specific design, configuration, and operation variations of an inverter from a basic ARCP inverter. The basic configuration and operation of ARCP is described, for example, an article “The auxiliary resonant commutated pole converter”, IEEE-IAS Conference Proceedings 1990, pp. 1228-35, and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,047,913 by R. W. De Doncker et al. The ARCP inverter can be implemented using various topologies, which all perform essentially similarly. The schematic of an exemplary ARCP inverter 1 is illustrated in
The exemplary ARCP inverter INV1 illustrated in
The dc-link rail 22 (the positive dc-link potential P) and the dc-link rail 24 (the negative dc-link potential N) may be connected to a first voltage terminal Udc+ and a second voltage terminal Udc− of the common DC power source 4. The common dc power input to the parallel-connected ARCP inverter modules INV1 and INV2 may be obtained from any kind of a dc power source 4, such as from an existing power supply network through a rectifier, or from a battery, fuel cell, photovoltaic array, etc. It shall be appreciated that dc-link 2 may be provided in a number of forms and may have a number of voltages and other attributes. It shall also be appreciated that the voltage difference between positive and negative dc-link rails is flexible, depending on how the dc-link 2 is charged or how the dc-link 2 is discharged by the connected circuits. For example, some embodiments may use a front-end isolation transformer and rectifier connected to the dc-link with the positive and negative rails floating and the differential voltage typically in the range of 50V-1500V, but in principle in other voltages outside this range as well. In other embodiments, the positive rail, mid-point, or negative rail may be grounded to earth. Preferably, the positive and negative rails are balanced. For example, if the dc-link neutral point NP is at 0 VDC, dc-link rail 22 would be at a positive voltage (e.g., in the range of +25 VDC to +500 VDC, the range of in the range of +150 VDC to +400 VDC or other positive voltage ranges) and dc-link rail 24 would be at a negative voltage corresponding to the positive voltage (e.g., in the range of −25 VDC to −500 VDC, the range of in the range of −150 VDC to −400 VDC or other negative voltage ranges corresponding to the other positive voltage ranges). It shall be appreciated that the foregoing examples are few of many voltage magnitudes and polarities that may be present in or associated with the operation of dc-link 2. It shall be additionally appreciated that the voltage magnitudes of the foregoing examples may be subject to fluctuation, margins of error, tolerance, and other variations and may not be rigidly fixed to the precise example magnitudes stated. It shall be further appreciated the term bus may be utilized in place of the term link such that, for example, references to a dc-link are understood to encompass a dc-bus and vice versa.
The exemplary half-bridge power section 10 illustrated in
In embodiments, the switching devices S1 and S2 may be an insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT), or another type of semiconductor switching device, such as an integrated gate-commutated thyristor (IGCT), a metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET), or a silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFET to name several examples.
It should be appreciated that although a single-phase ARCP inverter is illustrated as an example herein, an ARCP inverter may be implemented as a three-phase inverter, or generally include any number of inverter phases or inverter legs. Moreover, although a half-bridge ARCP inverter is illustrated as an example herein, the ARCP inverter may have other configurations, particularly a full-bridge configuration. In a multi-phase inverter, there may be an identical ARCP power section 10 for each phase or inverter leg of the inverter, and a common or dedicated dc-link 2 for each phase or inverter leg. In embodiments, power sections 10 of inverter legs in a multi-phase ARCP inverter may be controlled by a same inverter-specific switching controller 8. In embodiments, two or more ARCP inverters or inverter legs may be connected in parallel to feed a common load.
In operation, when the first main switch S1 is turned on (to a conductive state), a first switch current Is can flow between the dc-link rail 22 and the output node 110. Similarly, when the second main switching device S2 is turned on (to a conductive state), a second switch current Is2 can flow between the output node 110 and the de-link rail 24. On the other hand, when the first main switching device S1 is turned off (to a non-conductive state), the first switch current Is1 will not flow in the switch-forward direction between the dc-link rail 22 and the output node 110, although a current Id1 may flow in the switch-reverse direction through the first anti-parallel diode D1 of the first main switching device S1. Similarly, when the second main switching device S2 is turned off (to a non-conductive state), the second switch current Is2 not flow in the switch-forward direction between the output node 110 and the de-link rail 24, although a current Id2 may flow in the switch-reverse direction through the anti-parallel diode D2 of the second switching device S2. Thus, by turning on and off the first main switching device S1 and the second main switching device S2, the output voltage at the output node 110 will be controlled or commutated to be either the voltage P from the dc-link rail 22 or the voltage N from the dc-link rail 24. The purpose of the resonant capacitors C1 and C2 is to limit the voltage slew rate of the output node; this ensures that the voltages Uc1 and Uc2 across the main switching devices S1 and S2 do not significantly change during turn-off such that the main switching devices are turned off at essentially zero-voltage.
The exemplary half-bridge power section 10 of the ARCP inverter illustrated in
The ARCP switching control 8 illustrated in
As used herein, the mode of commutating the output current Io from a diode to a switch (e.g., the current Io from the diode D2 to the switch S1) in ARCP is called mode A and the mode of commutating the output current Io from a switch to a diode (e.g., the current Io from the switch S1 to the diode D2) is called mode B, when the auxiliary circuit is involved in commutation and a boost current is provided. The mode of commutating high output current Io from a switch to diode, when the output current Io itself is sufficient to drive the output voltage from one dc-link rail to another and the auxiliary circuit is not involved, is called mode O herein.
Mode A commutation: If the output current Io is positive (Io>0) and the output voltage Uo swings from the potential N (the dc-link 24) to the potential P (the dc-link 22), the lower diode D2 commutate its current Id2 to the upper switch S1. If the output current Io is negative (Io<0) and the output voltage Uo swings from the potential P (the dc-link 22) to the potential N (the dc-link 24), the upper diode D1 commutates its current Id1 to the lower switch S2.
Mode B commutation: If the output current Io is positive (Io>0) and the output voltage Uo swings from the potential P (the dc-link 22) to the potential N (the dc-link 24), the upper switch S1 commutates its current to the lower diode D2. If the output current Io is negative (Io<0) and the output voltage Uo swings from the potential N (the dc-link 24) to the potential P (the dc-link 22), the lower switch S2 commutates its current to the upper diodes D1.
In the following, examples of typical ARCP commutation in modes A and B are briefly described for a single phase of the ARCP inverter INV.
As an example of the mode A, a commutation of the positive output current Io (Io>0) from the lower diode D2 to the upper main switch S1 and the output voltage Uo from N to P will described with reference to
where
IpA is the peak value of the resonant part of the inductor current
β is a phase angle
and C=C1+C2 in the exemplary topology B shown in
When Uc2 reaches Udc and Uc1 reaches zero after a time interval tsA (
As an example of the mode B, a commutation of the positive output current Io (Io>0) from the upper main switch S1 to the lower diode D2 and a swing of the output voltage Uo from N to P will described with reference to
where
IpB is the peak value of the resonant part of the inductor current,
γ is a phase angle,
and C=C1+C2. The voltage change rate average is du/dt=Udc/tsB.
The descriptions above for modes A and B assumed a positive direction of Io. The operation for a negative Io (Io<0) is identical, just the roles of S1 and S2, D1 and D2, and Uc1 and Uc2 are swapped from mode A to mode B, and vice versa.
The resonant branch of the ARCPI topology is prone to an excess voltage oscillation and potential overvoltage across the auxiliary switches Sa1 and Sa2, which is mainly due to reverse recovery current of auxiliary diodes Da1 and Da2 and the LC resonance circuit. The resonant inductor L1 may typically be a conventional inductor with or without a magnetic core, and one solution for the oscillation and overvoltage problems has been to use a saturable-core inductor Lsat in series with the conventional resonant inductor L1 in the auxiliary circuit, as illustrated in
The saturable inductor Lsat is designed to provide high inductance for very low levels of current, but almost zero inductance above the saturation current. An example of a behavior of the auxiliary current Ia in theory and in practice in an ARCP commutation with Ia>0 (la flows in direction from the neutral point NP) is presented in
An aspect of invention is a power inverter system having a saturation instant detector configured to detect a saturation instant of a saturable-core inductor, i.e., the instant when the auxiliary current exceeds a saturation current of the saturable-core inductor after turn-on of an auxiliary switch. An ARCP controller is configured to continue providing the auxiliary current for a predetermined boost period after the detected saturation instant of the saturable-core inductor.
The predetermined boost period may be a boost time to determined or calculated based on the known inductance of the resonant inductor L1 in a normal manner. Thus, the boost time after saturation instant can be determined precisely using the known inductance of the resonant inductor L1. Basically, the calculated boost time to is applied from the detected saturation instant instead of the turn-on instant of the auxiliary switch, and thereby there is a sufficient time for the actual auxiliary current Ia (and thereby the boost current Ib) to reach a required or optimal value, as illustrated in
In embodiments, the ARCP control may calculate a boost time to using, for example, the equation (7) for mode A commutations and the equation (8) for mode B commutations
wherein L1 is the inductance of the resonant inductor of the auxiliary circuit.
In embodiments, the saturable-core inductor comprises a primary winding and a secondary winding. The auxiliary current is flowing through the primary winding and secondary winding is used for saturation sensing purposes. The saturation instant tsat of the saturable inductor Lsat can be detected from the voltage induced in the secondary winding. In principle, when the auxiliary current flowing in the primary winding is low and the saturable-core inductor Lsat is not saturated, the voltage in the secondary winding is proportional to the voltage of the primary winding. When the auxiliary current increases beyond the saturation current, the voltage induced in the secondary winding drops to near to zero.
As an example, a saturable core inductor may be implemented by routing busbar or wire (forming a primary winding) through one or more saturable transformer cores of a ring or tube shape. A secondary winding may be implemented by routing another parallel wire through the same saturable core, for example.
In embodiments, the saturation instant detector is connected to the dc-link neutral point NP and configured to detect the saturation instant based on a voltage of the dc-link neutral point NP. The dc-link capacitors, such as Cd1 and Cd2, have typically parasitic inductance and resistance, which cause a voltage drop during fast current transient. In principle, a positive auxiliary current Ia causes the neutral point voltage UNP to drop, and a negative auxiliary current Ia causes the neutral point voltage UNP to rise. A sudden drop or rise of the neutral point voltage due to the positive or negative auxiliary current exceeding a saturation threshold can be sensed and used for detecting a saturation instant.
Other exemplary embodiments for sensing or detecting a saturation instant tsat include an auxiliary current sensing using, for example, a Hall sensor or a Rogowski coil and detecting a rapid increase of current by a very fast AD converter or comparator. A still further example to sense a auxiliary current by a wire or a PCB trace that is located near the high current path (busbar) and sense the voltage induced due to a rapid current change by a comparator.
The ARCP control and boost time control techniques described herein may be implemented by various means. For example, these techniques may be implemented in hardware (one or more devices), firmware (one or more devices), software (one or more modules), or combinations thereof. For a firmware or software, implementation can be through modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein. The software codes may be stored in any suitable, processor/computer-readable data storage medium(s) or memory unit(s) and executed by one or more processors/computers. The data storage medium or the memory unit may be implemented within the processor/computer or external to the processor/computer, in which case it can be communicatively coupled to the processor/computer via various means as is known in the art. Additionally, components of systems described herein may be rearranged and/or complimented by additional components in order to facilitate achieving the various aspects, goals, advantages, etc., described with regard thereto, and are not limited to the precise configurations set forth in a given figure, as will be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
It will be obvious to a person skilled in the art that, as the technology advances, the inventive concept can be implemented in various ways. The invention and its embodiments are not limited to the examples described above but may vary within the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
23168194.1 | Apr 2023 | EP | regional |