Patent Grant
10749396
This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-088276, filed Apr. 26, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Embodiments described herein relate generally to an armature winding having five parallel circuits applied to a 3-phase rotating electrical machine having forty five slots per pole.
In a large-capacity rotating electrical machine, an armature winding is provided with upper and lower coil pieces arranged in slots of a laminated iron core in a two-layer structure, and parallel circuits are connected in series, thereby increasing the generated voltage and machine capacity. However, as a voltage of an armature winding is increased, the thickness of the main insulation of an armature winding is increased to withstand such higher voltage. As a result, a cross-sectional area of a conducting portion is reduced, and a current density increases, so that a loss increases.
Particularly, in an indirect cooling type machine in which the armature winding is cooled from an outer side of the main insulation, as the thickness of the main insulation increases, a thermal resistance increases, and a temperature disadvantageously increases in the armature winding. For this reason, an armature winding is divided into multiple parallel circuits, thereby decreasing the voltage of the armature winding and the thickness of the main insulation, reducing the loss, and increasing the cooling capacity, while maintaining the machine capacity. Further, in an indirect cooling type large-capacity machine, it is common to increase the number of slots in the armature winding to increase a cooling cycle of the armature winding. Therefore, an armature winding having three or more parallel circuits is desirable.
If the armature winding having three or more parallel circuits is applied to a 2-pole machine, the voltages generated by each of the parallel circuits are not completely equated, and a circulating current is generated between the parallel circuits, and a loss in the armature winding increases disadvantageously.
In order to reduce such a loss caused by the circulating current, it is necessary to minimize imbalance between the voltages generated by the parallel circuits. For this purpose, a special consideration is required in placement of coils of each parallel circuit in each phase belt.
An example of improvement in the placement of coils will be described with reference to
Although
In Taylor's patent, assuming that the parallel circuits are numbered “1 to 4,” twelve parallel circuits of upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of a first phase belt 17 are numbered “122121121221” sequentially from a pole center. Similarly, parallel circuits of upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of a second phase belt 18 are numbered “344343343443” sequentially from the pole center. This decreases a deviation of voltage (an absolute value of a deviation from an average phase voltage) and a deviation of phase difference (a deviation of phase angle from an average phase voltage) of each parallel circuit.
To realize such a connection, in
Meanwhile, a technique for reducing deviations in the voltage and the phase angle between each parallel circuit is discussed in Habermann's patent.
In Habermann's patent, a voltage deviation between each parallel circuit is rated at 0.4% or smaller, and a phase angle deviation is rated at 0.15° or smaller. However, in Taylor's patent, the voltage deviation is rated at 0.12%, and the phase angle deviation is rated at 0°. It is conceived that these values are highly balanced and sufficiently efficient to decrease a circulating current under the same condition.
The connection method of Taylor's patent described above provides an armature winding having four parallel circuits applicable to a 3-phase 2-pole 72-slot rotating electrical machine. However, in an indirect cooling type large-capacity rotating electrical machine, it is necessary for the armature winding to have a greater number of parallel circuits. In this regard, as illustrated in
In the future, it is anticipated that a novel large-capacity technology is employed in the indirect cooling type large-capacity rotating electrical machine, and this may increase the number of windings to obtain a satisfactory generation voltage. For this purpose, it is desired to implement an armature winding having a greater number of slots. For example, it is desired to implement an armature winding of a rotating electrical machine having five parallel circuits applied to a 3-phase rotating electrical machine having 45 slots per pole.
Hereinafter, embodiments will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In general, according to one embodiment, there is provided a three-phase even-numbered-pole two-layered armature winding housed in forty five slots per pole provided in a laminated iron core of a rotating electrical machine, comprising: five parallel circuits provided for each phase of the winding and divided into a pair of phase belts including first and second phase belts, each parallel circuit including upper and lower coil pieces which are connected to each other in series in a connection side coil end and a counter-connection side coil end, wherein coil pieces corresponding to first and second parallel circuits are arranged in the first phase belt, coil pieces corresponding to fourth and fifth parallel circuits are arranged in the second phase belt, coil pieces corresponding to the third parallel circuit are arranged in the first and second phase belts, and the upper coil pieces and the lower coil pieces of each parallel circuit are placed in same-numbered positions from a pole center.
First, a first embodiment will be described with reference to
An armature 11 of the rotating electrical machine of
The armature winding of each phase has upper coil pieces 15 housed in the upper part of the slot 13 around a pole center Pb and lower coil pieces 16 housed in the lower part of the slot 13 around a pole center Pa. The ends of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are connected in series at a connection side coil end 19a connected to a lead-out portion of the winding, and at a counter-connection side coil end 19b located axially opposite to the connection side coil end 19a and not connected to the lead-out portion of the winding. Further, the armature winding has a first phase belt 17 in which the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are housed in the fifteen slots 13 provided in the armature core 12, and a second phase belt 18 in which the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are housed in the fifteen slots 13.
Here, each of the first and second phase belts refers to a group of coils assigned with the same phase by dividing each of three phases into two parts and housing the upper and lower coil pieces in 45 slots per pole of the laminated iron core (armature core) in a two-layer structure and sequentially connecting them in series.
The armature winding of each phase has five parallel circuits. The parallel circuits are given circled numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 for identification in the drawings. Note that the circuit numbers are assigned to identify the parallel circuits for convenience of explanation, and may be given any symbol in any order.
In each phase belt 17 and 18, the upper coil piece 15 is connected to the corresponding lower coil piece 16 in the connection side coil end 19a and the counter-connection side coil end 19b apart by a predetermined coil pitch to form five parallel circuits. The parallel circuits are connected in parallel through the lead-out connection conductor 21 provided in the connection side coil end 19a to form an armature winding 14. In
As illustrated in
As a result, when relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in each phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 1.
As shown in Table 1, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 5th, 6th, 10th, 11th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 4th, 7th, 9th, 12th, and 14th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 8th, and 13th positions from the pole center.
Next, imbalance of the voltage generated in one phase will be described. Here, the following definition is generally employed as a means for numerically evaluating the degree of imbalance. Specifically, the voltage expressed by “p.u.” of only one of the multiple parallel circuits in one phase refers to a ratio between an open-circuit voltage of the corresponding parallel circuit and an average voltage (phase voltage) in the entire phase, and indicates a degree of imbalance in the voltage between the corresponding parallel circuit and the entire phase. Similarly, a phase angle deviation between the open-circuit voltage generated in one parallel circuit and the phase voltage indicates a degree of imbalance in the phase angle of the voltage between the corresponding parallel circuit and the entire phase.
Table 2 shows the degree of balance in the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the first embodiment. However, in the first embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on the coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 2, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 2, in the armature winding according to the first embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is 0.49% at most, and a phase angle deviation is 0.00°. It is recognized that the armature winding according to the first embodiment satisfies the requirement regarding the voltage deviation and phase angle deviation of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be set to 0.4% and the phase angle deviation be set to 0.15′ or smaller.
Table 3 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the first embodiment. While Table 3 shows a case where the coil pitch is within a range of 35/45 to 39/45, according to the first embodiment, the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation are constant regardless of the coil pitch.
As described above, according to the first embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the lead-out positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a second embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 4.
As shown in Table 4, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 5th, 7th, 9th, 11th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 10th, 12th, and 14th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 8th, and 13th positions from the pole center.
Table 5 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the second embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the second embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 5, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 5, in the armature winding according to the second embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.49%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values roughly satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent.
Table 6 shows a change of the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the second embodiment. While Table 6 shows a case where the coil pitch is within a range of “35/45 to 39/45,” according to the second embodiment, the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation are constant regardless of the coil pitch.
As described above, according to the second embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the lead-out positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a third embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 7.
As shown in Table 7, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 6th, 7th, 9th, 10th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 4th, 5th, 11th, 12th, and 14th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 8th, and 13th positions from the pole center.
Table 8 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the third embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the third embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 8, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 8, in the armature winding according to the third embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.49%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15°” or smaller.
Table 9 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the third embodiment. While Table 9 shows a case where the coil pitch is within a range of “35/45 to 39/45,” according to the third embodiment, the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation are constant regardless of the coil pitch.
As described above, according to the third embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the lead-out positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a fourth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 10.
As shown in Table 10, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 6th, 7th, 9th, 10th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 8th, 11th, and 12th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 13th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 11 shows the degree of balance in the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the fourth embodiment. However, in the fourth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on the coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 11, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 11, in the armature winding according to the fourth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is 0.19% at most, and a phase angle deviation is 0.00°. It is recognized that the armature winding according to the fourth embodiment satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be set to 0.4% or smaller and the phase angle deviation be set to 0.15° or smaller.
Table 12 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the fourth embodiment. When the coil pitch is “37/45,” the degree of balance satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15°” or smaller.
As described above, according to the fourth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the lead-out positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a fifth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 13.
As shown in Table 13, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 6th, 7th, 9th, 10th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 8th, 12th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 11th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 14 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the fifth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the fifth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 14, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 14, in the armature winding according to the fifth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.19%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
Table 15 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the fifth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 36/45 to 38/45, the degree of balance satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15°” or smaller.
As described above, according to the fifth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the lead-out positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
The sixth to sixteenth embodiments described below relate to an exemplary configuration of an armature winding in which the jumper wire 20a for connecting the coil pieces of the same parallel circuit within the same phase belt using the connection side coil end 19a is connected to the coil piece connected to the lead-out connection conductor 21 and several coil pieces excluding the coil piece located in the vicinity of the coil piece connected to the lead-out connection conductor 21. In this configuration, the connection-side jumper wire 20a and the lead-out connection conductor 21 do not easily interfere with each other. Therefore, it is possible to more easily perform a work for connecting the connection-side jumper wire 20a or the lead-out connection conductor 21 and prevent a failure in the coil connection or an insulation failure. In addition, it is possible to provide a rotating electrical machine having higher reliability.
First, a sixth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 16.
As shown in Table 16, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 6th, 7th, 8th, 12th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 9th, 10th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 11th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 17 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the sixth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the sixth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 17, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 17, in the armature winding according to the sixth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.0589%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
Table 18 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the sixth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 36/45 to 38/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the sixth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a seventh embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 19.
As shown in Table 19, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 4th, 8th, 9th, 12th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th, 10th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 11th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 20 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the seventh embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the seventh embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 20, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 20, in the armature winding according to the seventh embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.0885%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent.
Table 21 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the seventh embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 36/45 to 38/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the seventh embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, an eighth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 22.
As shown in Table 22, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 6th, 7th, 9th, 12th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 8th, 10th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 11th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 23 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the eighth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the eighth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 23, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 23, in the armature winding according to the eighth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.3654%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
Table 24 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the eighth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 37/45 to 38/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the eighth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a ninth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 25.
As shown in Table 25, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 3rd, 9th, 10th, 12th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 11th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 26 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the ninth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the ninth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 26, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 26, in the armature winding according to the ninth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.2705%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
Table 27 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the ninth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 36/45 to 37/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the ninth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a tenth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 28.
As shown in Table 28, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 4th, 9th, 10th, 12th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 11th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 29 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the tenth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the tenth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 29, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 29, in the armature winding according to the tenth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.0946%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
Table 30 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the tenth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 36/45 to 38/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the tenth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, an eleventh embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 31.
As shown in Table 31, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 5th, 7th, 9th, 12th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 11th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 32 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the eleventh embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the eleventh embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 32, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 32, in the armature winding according to the eleventh embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.1990%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15” or smaller.
Table 33 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the eleventh embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 36/45 to 38/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the eleventh embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a twelfth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 34.
As shown in Table 34, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 4th, 7th, 9th, 11th, and 14th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 5th, 6th, 10th, 12th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 8th, and 15th positions from the pole center.
Table 35 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the twelfth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the twelfth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 35, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 35, in the armature winding according to the twelfth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.2158%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15” or smaller.
Table 36 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the twelfth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 34/45 to 38/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the twelfth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a thirteenth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 37.
As shown in Table 37, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 9th, 11th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 5th, 7th, 10th, 12th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 8th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 38 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the thirteenth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the thirteenth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 38, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 38, in the armature winding according to the thirteenth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.2242%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
Table 39 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the thirteenth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 36/45 to 41/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the thirteenth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a fourteenth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 40.
As shown in Table 40, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 9th, 11th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 5th, 7th, 10th, 12th, and 14th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 8th, and 15th positions from the pole center.
Table 41 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the fourteenth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the fourteenth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 41, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 41, in the armature winding according to the fourteenth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.2500%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
Table 42 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the fourteenth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 36/45 to 38/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the fourteenth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a fifteenth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 43.
As shown in Table 43, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 4th, 6th, 9th, 10th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 5th, 7th, 8th, 12th, and 13th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 11th, and 14th positions from the pole center.
Table 44 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the fifteenth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the fifteenth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 44, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 44, in the armature winding according to the fifteenth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.1531%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
Table 45 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the fifteenth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 36/45 to 38/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the fifteenth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Next, a sixteenth embodiment will be described with reference to
As illustrated in
As a result, if the relative positions of the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 in the phase belt are expressed by positions from the pole center, the upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 of each parallel circuit are placed as shown in Table 46.
As shown in Table 46, for each of the first and fourth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 3rd, 4th, 6th, 9th, 10th, and 15th positions from the pole center. For each of the second and fifth parallel circuits, six upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 1st, 5th, 7th, 8th, 12th, and 14th positions from the pole center. For the third parallel circuit, three upper and lower coil pieces 15 and 16 are placed in the 2nd, 11th, and 13th positions from the pole center.
Table 47 shows the degree of balance of the voltage generated from the armature winding according to the sixteenth embodiment. Meanwhile, according to the sixteenth embodiment, the degree of balance varies depending on a coil pitch. Therefore, in Table 47, the coil pitch is set to “37/45 (82.22%).” As shown in Table 47, in the armature winding according to the sixteenth embodiment, a voltage deviation (a deviation of a p.u. voltage from 1.0) is “0.2765%” at most, and a phase angle deviation is “0.00°.” It is recognized that these values satisfy the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
Table 48 shows a change in the maximum values of the voltage deviation and the phase angle deviation depending on a coil pitch according to the sixteenth embodiment. When the coil pitch is within a range of 37/45 to 40/45, the voltage deviation satisfies the requirement of Habermann's patent, in which the voltage deviation be “0.4%” or smaller, and the phase angle deviation be “0.15° ” or smaller.
As illustrated in
As described above, according to the sixteenth embodiment, it is possible to realize the degree of balance satisfying the requirement of Habermann's patent regarding the voltages of the parallel circuits and reduce a circulating current.
Note that the embodiment is not limited to the configuration described above. For example, the jumper wire positions may be set differently from those described above, or the coil pieces located in electrically equivalent positions may be exchanged between the parallel circuits 1 and 4.
Structural features common to the armature windings throughout the first to sixteenth embodiments will be presented below.
As described above, according to each embodiment, it is possible to provide a highly reliable armature winding structure having a number of slots suitable for an indirect cooling type large-capacity rotating electrical machine.
While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventions. Indeed, the novel embodiments described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the embodiments described herein may be made. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope of the inventions.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-088276 | Apr 2016 | JP | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2731576 | McElligott | Jan 1956 | A |
| 2745029 | McElligott | May 1956 | A |
| 2778962 | Taylor | Jan 1957 | A |
| 2778963 | Habermann, Jr. | Jan 1957 | A |
| 3408517 | Willyoung | Oct 1968 | A |
| 3652888 | Harrington | Mar 1972 | A |
| 20090096312 | Tokumasu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195105 | Tokumasu | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20160322878 | Tokumasu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170093240 | Ueda | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170093241 | Fujita | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170170698 | Tanaka | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170310182 | Ueda | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 5367436 | Dec 2013 | JP |
| 2017-63579 | Mar 2017 | JP |
| 2017-63580 | Mar 2017 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170310182 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
