Patent Grant
8091465
This invention relates to a reactive armor adapted to protect a body from an incoming projectile, in particular against projectiles such as shaped charges and explosive formed charges (EFP), by ensuring that the energy of the projectile's impact on the armor causes a reaction during the course of which, an armor element of the armor is propelled toward the projectile in order to absorb its energy.
The present invention particularly relates to a reactive armor which includes an array of armor cassettes each comprising armor plates sandwiching between them the energetic material.
Most of such armor cassettes are designed such that, when an incoming projectile impacts one of the armor plates, it triggers a reaction in the energetic material causing it to expand rapidly, thereby propelling the armor plates in opposite directions.
Such armor has been shown to be very effective against such projectiles as directional jets or long penetrator projectiles, in particular, if the armor cassettes are mounted onto the body to be protected at an angle to the anticipated direction of incoming threat.
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided an armor array for protecting a body to be protected from an incoming projectile having an anticipated impact direction, said armor array being constituted by at least a first and a second armor cassette, each comprising a top base plate and a bottom base plate sandwiching therebetween an expandable layer, said first and second armor cassettes being spaced apart by an intermediate depressible panel having a top and a bottom face, such that the bottom base plate of said first armor cassette faces the top face of said intermediate depressible panel and the top base plate of said second cassette faces the bottom face of said intermediate depressible panel, wherein said armor array is constructed such that upon expansion of the expandable layer, caused by the impact of said incoming projectile, at least one of the bottom base plate of said first armor cassette and the top base plate of said second armor cassette is urged towards said intermediate depressible panel and depresses it said intermediate depressible panel.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided an armor module comprising a housing containing the armor array as described above, said housing being constructed for mounting onto said body to be protected.
The housing of said armor module may have at least one of the front and rear walls and support walls, such that when mounted onto said body to be protected, the front of the housing faces the anticipated impact direction for which said armor module is designed, and the rear of the housing faces said body to be protected.
The front and/or rear wall of said housing may be formed with a main mounting arrangement allowing mounting said armor module onto said body to be protected. Said housing may further be formed with an auxiliary mounting arrangement allowing attachment of said armor array to said housing, e.g. at its front or rear or support walls.
The housing, the main mounting arrangement and the auxiliary mounting arrangement may all be made of metallic material, e.g. steel.
Said armor array may comprise a plurality of armor cassettes and a plurality of depressible panels, which may all be densely packed as an array, at least the majority of the cassettes having the intermediate depressible panel adjacent at least one of its top and bottom base plates. The term ‘densely packed’ is used herein to refer to an array in which the distance between the top/bottom base plate of one armor cassette and an adjacent face of the depressible panel is considerably less than the thickness of the armor cassette or the depressible panel, the thinner of the two.
The armor array may be assembled such that the armor cassettes and depressible panels are arranged in an alternating order, i.e. cassette-panel-cassette-panel etc.
According to one example, the armor cassettes and depressible panels are only attached to the housing of the armor module. According to another example, the armor cassettes and depressible panels may be attached to each other, for example, by an adhesive, e.g. glue, resin etc. to form an essentially robust armor array.
The armor array may be designed such that, when said armor module is mounted on the body to be protected, the armor cassettes are slanted, i.e. at an angle, e.g. about 60° to the anticipated impact direction of said incoming projectile. In this connection, it should be explained that the “anticipated impact direction” in the present specification and claims means a direction generally perpendicular to the surface of a body to be protected, on which the armor is constructed to be mounted. In other words, if the surface of a body to be protected is generally vertical, the anticipated impact direction is generally horizontal.
The base plates of each of said armor cassettes may have a thickness of about 1-5 mm and may be made of metallic material, e.g. steel. Alternatively, said base plates may be made of composite material, having properties chosen so as to provide similar ballistic characteristics as those of the steel base plate.
Said expandable layer may have a thickness of about 2-8 mm, and be made of an essentially low density energetic material. One example of such a material may be Polyoxymethylane (POM) which has a density of about 1-2.5 g/cm3. However, it should be appreciated that a variety of other materials may be used such as rubber, plastic or composite materials, glued or otherwise combined to form said expandable layer.
Said intermediate depressible panel may be have a thickness of about 10-30 mm and may have a low density of about 0.2-1 g/cm3.
According to one example, the intermediate layer may be constituted by a single body made of a depressible material, for example, rubber, metallic foam, plastic, aluminum (AL), polycarbonate (PC), polyurethane (PU) etc. According to another example, the depressible panel may be an assembly of elements, constructed such that the assembly has depressible characteristics, for example, a depressible structure.
According to the latter example, the depressible structure may be of a rib type, i.e. made of a plurality of thin elements extending between said top and said bottom face of the depressible panel, said thin elements being made of deformable material and constructed for deformation under pressure applied thereon. According to a specific example, the thin elements may be may be made of aluminum, aluminum alloy etc., and may be arranged to form a pattern, e.g. a honeycomb structure. One advantage of the honeycomb structure is that on one hand, it is constructed to maintains a rigid form, even under the pressure of the weight of the armor cassettes positioned above it (i.e. even the lower most depressible panel is adapted not to deform under the weight of the entire array above it), and on the other hand, once sufficient pressure is applied thereto at a specific point, e.g. by propulsion of a base plate in its direction due to expansion of the expandable layer, the honeycomb structure at that point is constructed to deform, generally leading to complete collapse of the entire honeycomb structure.
The intermediate depressible panel may further comprise two skin layers attached to the top and bottom faces thereof. Each skin layers may be made of a variety of material ranging from rubber, through aluminum, and even steel. The arrangement is such that each skin layer faces the base plate of an adjacent armor cassette. The skin layer may provide, inter alia, the following advantages:
In operation, the expandable layer of an armor cassette, upon impact of said projectile, expands, causing the base plates to be propelled in opposite directions. Since each base plate is adjacent a depressible panel, the base plates tend to be propelled in the direction of the depressible panel to which they are adjacent and expand into it. More particularly, the base plates expand while applying pressure on the intermediate depressible panel. With particular reference to a previous example, this expansion is achieved by the plates deforming the aluminum honeycomb structure. This allows better absorption of the kinetic energy of said incoming projectile.
The armor module according to the present invention may be particularly effective against jet or similar penetrators made of copper or other dynamically stretched metals and alloys, for example, Shaped Charges (SC) and EFP. The thickness of the armor module along the anticipated impact direction may be determined, inter alia, according to the length of the incoming projectile from which said body is to be protected, its expected energy and the arrangement of the armor cassettes and depressible panels. In particular, a more dense array of armor cassettes, i.e. thinner depressible panels between cassettes, may allow reducing the overall thickness of the armor module. However, it should be mentioned that there exists a lower limit for the thickness of the depressible panel in order for the armor module to functions as intended. This lower limit may be about 15 mm. In general, said armor module may have a thickness of about 400÷450 mm, and have a weight of 250÷750 Kg/m2.
In order to understand the invention and to see how it may be carried out in practice, embodiments will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference to
The housing 20 is formed of two main support walls 22, and a front armor plate 24 and a bottom plate 26 attached to the main support walls 22. The housing 20 is encompassed by a cover C made of continuous sheet of metal having a top surface T, a bottom surface B (not shown) and two side surfaces S.
The front armor plate 24 is attached to the support walls 22 using a plurality of protrusions 25 inserted into extended portions of the support walls 22 having slits 23F formed therein (shown
The housing 20 is further formed with a support 28 adapted to support the armor array 30. The support 28a is attached to the support walls 22 via protrusions 29a inserted into corresponding slits 27b formed in the support walls 22.
The housing is also formed with a top limiter 29b, positioned at the top of the array 30, and adapted to restrain the armor array 30. The top limiter 29b is formed with shaped protrusions 28b constructed to be inserted into shaped slits 27b of the support walls 22, in order to allow slight movement of the limiter 29b along the extensions of the slit 27b during operation, as denoted by arrow 110.
The support walls 22 of the housing are further formed with extensions formed with slits 23R constructed for attachment of the armor module 10 to the body (60, partially shown
The armor array 30 is constituted by a plurality of armor cassettes 40, each two adjacent cassettes being spaced apart by a depressible panel 50. In the discussed example, the armor cassettes 40 and depressible panels 50 are glued to each other such that the armor array 30 is robust and acts like a single unit.
Turning to
The depressible panel 50 is in the form of a structure 54 constituted by aluminum ribs 56 arranged to form the honeycomb pattern. The honeycomb structure 54 is covered on top and bottom faces by rubber skin layers 52T and 52B respectively. However, it would be appreciated that the depressible panel may also be in the form of a single body made of depressible material, for example, metallic foam, or other filler material such as plastic, Polycarbonate, etc.
Turning now to
With reference to
In operation, upon impact of an incoming penetrator (not shown), the expandable layer 44 expands, thereby causing the base plates 42T, 42B to perform an outward movement, i.e. increasing the distance between one another. However, since the top plate 42T is restricted from above by one depressible panel 50, and the bottom plate 42B is restricted from below by another depressible panel 50, the base plates 42T, 42B are forced to depress the depressible panel 50 by causing deformation of the honeycomb structure 54 thereof. This depression provides absorption of a considerable amount of the kinetic energy of the incoming penetrator.
It should also be noted that since the armor cassettes 40 and the depressible panels 50 are glued to each other, each of the base plates 42T, 42B is glued to the rubber skin 52B, 52T of the respective adjacent depressible panels 50. Being glued to an elastic material such as the rubber skin 52, allows increasing the overall fracture toughness of the base plate 42, i.e. increasing, with respect to a base plate 42 not having a rubber skin 52 glued thereto, the time t after which the base plate 42 breaks as a result of the impact. This feature allows the base plate 42, and consequently the entire armor module 10 to withstand the impact of a longer penetrator. It would also be noted that any remains of the penetrator able to penetrate through the armor module 10, may be stopped by an armor of the body.
Those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains will readily appreciate that numerous changes, variations, and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention, mutatis mutandis.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 186398 | Oct 2007 | IL | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 787065 | White | Apr 1905 | A |
| 2279110 | Collins | Apr 1942 | A |
| 2348130 | Hardy, Jr. | May 1944 | A |
| 2380393 | Berg | Jul 1945 | A |
| 2477852 | Bacon | Aug 1949 | A |
| 3765299 | Pagano et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3962976 | Kelsey | Jun 1976 | A |
| 4036104 | Pagano et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4125053 | Lasker | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4198454 | Norton | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4404889 | Miguel | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4529640 | Brown et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4567100 | Pickett et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4836084 | Vogelesang et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4895063 | Marlow et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4965138 | Gonzalez | Oct 1990 | A |
| H1061 | Rozner et al. | Jun 1992 | H |
| 5349893 | Dunn | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5398592 | Turner | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5452641 | Kariya | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5471905 | Martin | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5499568 | Turner | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5670734 | Middione et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 6082240 | Middione et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6138275 | Sacks | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6418832 | Colvin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6698331 | Yu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 7080587 | Benyami et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7601654 | Bhatnagar et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 20040118271 | Puckett et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20060048640 | Terry et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1746379 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 2803379 | Jul 2001 | FR |
| 2006074685 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110126695 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
