Patent Grant
8551607
This invention relates to armor systems in general and more specifically to coated armor systems.
Armor systems are known in the art and are currently being used in a wide range of applications, including, for example, aircraft, armored vehicles, and body armor systems, wherein it is desirable to provide protection against bullets and other projectiles. While early armor systems tended to rely on a single layer of a hard and brittle material, such as a ceramic material, it was soon recognized that the effectiveness of the armor system could be improved considerably if the ceramic material were affixed to or backed up with an energy-absorbing material, such as fiberglass. The presence of the energy-absorbing backup layer tends to reduce the spallation caused by impact of the projectile with the ceramic material or “impact layer” of the armor system, thereby reducing the damage caused by the projectile impact. Testing has demonstrated that such multi-layer armor systems tend to stop projectiles at higher velocities than do the ceramic materials when utilized without the backup layer.
While such multi-layer armoring systems are being used with some degree of success, they are not without their problems. For example, difficulties are often encountered in creating a structure capable of withstanding multiple projectile impacts. Another problem relates to the overall performance (e.g., energy absorbing/deflecting capability) of the armor system, and improvements in performance are always desirable.
Partly in an effort to solve the foregoing problems, armor systems have been proposed wherein the ceramic material is coated or encapsulated with a metal. The encapsulating metal coating would, at least in theory, provide some degree of structural confinement to the ceramic core material, thereby improving the ability of the ceramic core material to withstand multiple impacts. A number of manufacturing methods have been developed to fabricate metal-encapsulated ceramic armor systems, including processes that involve welding, machining, pressing, powder metallurgy, and casting. Unfortunately, however, the methods developed to date are not without their problems relating to technical feasibility, manufacturing, or economics. Consequently, the concept of an encapsulated armor system is likely to be abandoned unless a method can be developed that is feasible from both technical and economic standpoints.
A method for producing an armor system comprises providing a core material and a stream of atomized coating material that comprises a liquid fraction and a solid fraction. An initial layer is deposited on the core material by positioning the core material in the stream of atomized coating material wherein the solid fraction of the stream of atomized coating material is less than the liquid fraction of the stream of atomized coating material on a weight basis. An outer layer is then deposited on the initial layer by positioning the core material in the stream of atomized coating material wherein the solid fraction of the stream of atomized coating material is greater than the liquid fraction of the stream of atomized coating material on a weight basis.
Another method for producing an armor system comprises providing a core material and a stream of atomized coating material that comprises a liquid fraction and a solid fraction. Substantially the entirety of the core material is encapsulated with a coating layer by positioning the core material in the stream of atomized coating material. The coating layer is then compressed to form the armor system.
Armor systems according to the present invention include armor systems produced in accordance with the foregoing methods. An armor system may also comprise a core material and a coating substantially encapsulating the core material, the coating being formed by directing an atomized stream of coating material toward the core material.
Illustrative and presently preferred embodiments of the invention are shown in the accompanying drawings in which:
An armor system 10 according to one embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
For example, and with reference now to
Another method for producing the armor system 10 involves encapsulating substantially the entirety of the core material 12 with the coating 14 by positioning the core material 12 in the stream 16 of atomized coating material 48. After being deposited, the coating 14 is then compressed to consolidate and increase the density of the coating 14. Thereafter, the coating 14 may be annealed or heat-treated to further enhance the performance of the armor system 10, as will be described in greater detail below.
A significant feature of the present invention is that it provides a means for quickly depositing an adherent coating on a core material in order to produce an encapsulated armor system. Any of a wide range of coating materials may be deposited, including pure metals, metal alloys, metal matrix compositions, and polymer compositions, thereby allowing for the production of armor systems having a wide range of performance envelopes and characteristics. The coatings produced by the processes described herein will often have improved material properties (e.g., in terms of strength and toughness) compared with cast or welded coatings. Control of the solid fraction of the layers during deposition is desirable to reduce the compressive forces applied to the core material which may damage the core material. In addition, the present invention can be used to provide coatings on core materials having complex shapes and geometries, thereby allowing the armor system to be optimized for the particular application. For example, conformal armor systems can be readily produced in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. Armor systems can also be produced having different performance capabilities at different locations. In addition, armor systems of the present invention will also have the ability to resist multiple hits.
Having briefly described the armor system 10, the various methods for making the armor system 10, as well as some of their more significant features and advantages, the various embodiments of the system and methods for making the armor system 10 will now be described in detail. However, before proceeding with the description, it should be noted that the teachings and methods described herein could be utilized in any of a wide range of applications wherein it is desired to encapsulate a core material with a coating in order to improve its performance, as would become apparent to persons having ordinary skill in the art after having become familiar with the teachings of the present invention. Consequently, the present invention should not be regarded as limited to the particular materials and applications shown and described herein.
With reference back now to
It should be noted that the core material 12 should not be regarded as limited to generally plate-like or tile-like form or configuration, but could instead comprise any of a wide variety of forms or configurations (e.g., plate, shell, cylindrical, or irregular), depending on the particular application. Indeed, and as mentioned above, a significant advantage of the present invention is that the spray deposition process disclosed herein may be used regardless of the particular form or configuration of the core material 12. That is, core materials 12 having curved or complex shapes may be coated just as easily as a core materials 12 having generally flat, plate-like or tile-like configurations.
The thickness 22 of the core material 12 should be selected so that the core material 12 will provide sufficient strength to allow the armor system 10 to stop projectiles having given properties and impact velocities. By way of example, in one embodiment, the core material 12 has a thickness of about 3.2 mm. Alternatively, core materials 12 having other thicknesses could be used depending on the particular application and desired performance envelope of the armor system 10. Therefore, the present invention should not be regarded as limited to core materials having any particular composition, configuration, or thickness.
The coating 14 may comprise any of a wide range of materials suitable for mechanically constraining the core material 12 to prevent the core material 12 from shattering in response to projectile impact. Thus, the coating 14 generally increases the ability of the armor system 10 to absorb multiple projectile hits. Generally speaking, it will be advantageous to form the coating 14 from a coating material 48 (
It is important to recognize that the coating 14 is not limited to metals or metal alloys, and other types of coating materials 48 (
Still other types of coating materials 48 that may be used to form the coating 14 include polymer materials, such as polycarbonate, polypropylene, polyurethane and urea. The use of polymers for the coating material 48 used to produce the coating 14 may be advantageous in certain applications, as would become apparent to persons having ordinary skill in the art after having become familiar with the teachings provided herein.
The coating 14 may be deposited on the core material 12 in various thicknesses depending on the particular type of coating material 48, the particular core material 12, as well as on the desired performance of the armor system 10. Consequently, the present invention should not be regarded as limited to coatings 14 having any particular thicknesses. However, notwithstanding the fact that the coating 14 may comprise any of a range of thicknesses, we have found that the performance of the armor system 10 can be enhanced when the thickness of the coating 14 bears some relation to the thickness of the core material 12.
For example, in the embodiment illustrated in
The coating 14 is deposited on the core material 12 by a spray forming apparatus 34 of the type illustrated in
Referring now to
The process chamber 36 may be fabricated from any of a wide range of materials suitable for the intended application. By way of example, in one embodiment, the process chamber 36 is fabricated from stainless steel, although other materials could be used.
The atomized stream 16 of coating material 48 (
The temperature and pressure of the atomizing gas provided to the nozzle assembly 46 may be independently controlled by means well-known in the art. Generally speaking, the total temperature of the atomizing gas entering the nozzle assembly 46 will be in the range of about 20° C. to about 2000° C. depending on the application. However, in this regard it should be noted that the gas temperature should be sufficiently high so as to prevent the coating material 48 from freezing before it is atomized. As will be described in greater detail below, the pressure of the atomizing gas provided to the nozzle assembly 46 should be selected to provide the desired flow conditions (e.g., subsonic, sonic, or supersonic) within the nozzle assembly 46. Generally speaking, the total pressure of the atomizing gas entering the nozzle assembly 46 will be in the range of about 100 kPa to about 700 kPa for most applications.
Referring now primarily to
The nozzle assembly 46 is operatively associated with the gas feed assembly 42 and the material feed assembly 44 and, in one embodiment, may comprise a converging/diverging nozzle 54 (e.g., a DeLaval nozzle) having a converging section 56 and a diverging section 58 separated by a throat section 60. The gas feed assembly 42 provides an atomizing gas (e.g., nitrogen) under pressure to the entrance of the converging section 56 of the nozzle 54. The atomizing gas is accelerated in the converging section 56 of the nozzle 54, whereupon it enters the throat section 60 of the nozzle 54. The atomizing gas is then ultimately discharged by the diverging section 58 of the nozzle 54. Depending on the particular pressure ratios involved (e.g., the entrance pressure and discharge pressure), the flow in the nozzle 54 may be entirely subsonic, sonic at the throat section 60 only, or sonic at the throat section 60 and supersonic in the diverging section 58 of the nozzle 54. In many applications, the atomizing gas will reach sonic speed in the throat section 60 and accelerate to supersonic speeds in at least a portion of the diverging section 58 of the nozzle 54.
Depending on the particular application, it may be desired or required to provide the nozzle assembly 46 with a heater 62 to prevent the liquid coating material 48 from freezing while still within the nozzle 54. Any of a wide range of heaters 62 may be utilized for this purpose, as would become apparent to persons having ordinary skill in the art after having become familiar with the teachings provided herein. By way of example, in one embodiment, the heater 62 comprises an induction heater.
The coating material feed assembly 44 is operatively associated with the nozzle 54 so that the coating material 48 is discharged into the throat section 60 of the nozzle 54. Alternatively, the coating material 48 may be discharged into the nozzle 54 at positions slightly upstream of or downstream from the throat section 60, as mentioned in the various patents described above and incorporated herein by reference.
Referring back now to
Process chamber 36 may also be provided with a press system 66 suitable for pressing (i.e., compressing) the coating 14 deposited on the core material 12. In the embodiment shown and described herein, the press system comprises a uni-axial press that exerts pressure along a single dimension or axis. Alternatively, the press system 66 may comprise apparatus for performing hot iso-static pressing or cold isostatic pressing. However, because pressing systems are known in the art and could be easily provided by persons having ordinary skill in the art after having become familiar with the teachings provided herein, the particular press system 66 utilized in one embodiment will not be described in further detail herein.
The process chamber 36 is also provided with a core material holder and manipulating system 68 suitable for holding the core material 12 and for moving it to various locations throughout the process chamber 36. For example, in the embodiment shown and described herein, the manipulating system 68 is capable of moving the core material 12 between the core material heating system 64, the atomized stream 16, and the press system 66. The manipulating system 68 is also capable of moving the core material 12 within the atomized stream 16 in a way that will allow the coating material 48 to be deposited on all of the surfaces (e.g., the front, back, and side surfaces 24, 26, and 28, respectively) of the core material 12, thereby encapsulating substantially the entirety of the core material 12 with the coating 14.
Comparatively high material deposition rates are possible with the spray forming apparatus 34. For example, aluminum and aluminum alloys have been deposited at rates up to about 227 kg/hour and steel alloys up to about 545 kg/hour with the bench-scale system shown and described herein. Of course, higher rates could be easily achieved by providing larger components to the spray forming apparatus 34.
As mentioned above, the coating 14 may be deposited on the core material 12 in accordance with the various methods described herein to produce the armor system 10. However, before describing those methods, it will be helpful to discuss the atomization process that results in the atomized stream 16.
The particular flow velocity utilized in the nozzle 54 will depend on the characteristics of the particular coating material 48 provided by the coating material feed assembly 44 as well as on the degree of atomization desired. The atomizing gas in the nozzle 54 disintegrates the liquid coating material 48 and entrains the resultant atomized droplets into a highly directed, two-phase (e.g., liquid/gas) or multi-phase (e.g., liquid, gas, solid) flow. During atomization, a liquid is disintegrated into relatively fine droplets by the action of aerodynamic forces that overcome the surface tension forces that consolidate the liquid. The viscosity and density of the liquid also influence atomization behavior, but typically play a secondary role. The viscosity of the liquid affects both the degree of atomization and the spray pattern by influencing the amount of interfacial contact area between the liquid and the atomizing gas. Viscous liquids oppose changes in geometry more efficiently than do low-viscosity liquids, making the generation of a uniform atomized stream 16 more difficult for a given set of flow conditions. The density of the liquid influences how the liquid responds to momentum transfer from the atomizing gas. Light liquids accelerate more rapidly in the gas stream.
The dynamics of droplet break-up in high-velocity flows is quite complex. The Weber number (We) is a useful predictor of break-up tendency. The Weber number is the ratio of inertial forces to surface tension forces and is expressed by the following equation:
where ρ is the density of the atomizing gas, V is the initial relative velocity between the atomizing gas flow and the droplet, D is the initial diameter of the droplet, and σ is the surface tension of the droplet. Break-up of liquid droplets will not occur unless the Weber number exceeds the critical value for the particular liquid involved.
Upon exiting the nozzle 54, the atomized stream 16 will typically comprise at least a two-phase (e.g., gas, liquid) flow. That is, the atomized stream 16 of coating material 48 will comprise at least a liquid fraction (e.g., the atomized liquid coating material 48) and a gas fraction (e.g., the atomizing gas). However, depending on the particular conditions, the atomized stream 16 exiting the nozzle 54 may comprise a multi-phase flow. That is, the atomized stream 16 of coating material 48 may comprise at least a liquid fraction (e.g., the atomized liquid coating material 48), a gas fraction (e.g., the atomizing gas), as well as a solid or frozen fraction (e.g., solidified or frozen coating material 48). In any event, once the atomized stream 16 leaves the nozzle 54, the atomized stream 16 will entrain amounts of the relatively cold ambient gas contained within the interior region 38 of process chamber 36. See
Referring now to
As mentioned above, the coating material 48 to be deposited on the core material 12 to form the coating 14 may comprise any of a wide range of materials suitable for spraying by the spray forming apparatus 34. For example, in another embodiment wherein the coating 14 is to comprise a metal matrix composite, the spray forming apparatus 34 may be provided with a supply of molten metal (e.g., coating material 48). The spray forming apparatus 34 may also be provided with a suitable ceramic constituent, preferably in powder form. The ceramic constituent may be mixed with the supply of molten metal or separately provided to the nozzle 54 via a separate supply system (not shown), as described in the U.S. patents referenced above. In still another alternative, a metal matrix coating 14 may be formed by the use of appropriate metallic coating materials 48 and atomizing gases. For example, using nitrogen gas to atomize low carbon steel alloyed with aluminum results in the formation of fine aluminum nitride particles that act as grain boundary pinning sites to refine the steel micro-structure of the resulting coating 14.
Polymers can be deposited by the spray forming apparatus 34 by feeding a molten or plasticized polymer, by in-flight melting of polymer powders fed into the nozzle 54, or by dissolving the polymer in a suitable solvent and spraying the solution. Heating the atomizing gas to an appropriate temperature will facilitate in-flight evaporation of the solvent from the atomized droplets. Any remaining solvent may be evaporated at the coating 14. As with metals, polymers can be co-deposited with ceramics to form polymer matrix composites.
Depending on the type of material that is to be applied, it may be required or desired to pre-heat the core material 12 before depositing the coating 14. Generally speaking, pre-heating the core material 12 will allow the initial deposits of coating material 48 to remain in the liquid state on the surface of the core material 12 for some period of time before freezing or solidifying. In many applications, this will result in lower interfacial tension and improved adhesion of the coating material 14 to the core material 12. If so, it will be generally desirable to pre-heat the core material 12 to a temperature that is about equal to, or possibly greater than, the freezing or solidification temperature of the coating material 48 being deposited. Another benefit of preheating is that it minimizes thermal shock-related damage to the core material. In the embodiment shown and described herein, the core material 12 may be pre-heated by placing it within the heating system 64 provided within the process chamber 36. A suitable temperature sensing device, such as an infra-red sensor (not shown), may be used to sense when the core material 12 has reached the desired temperature.
According to one method of the embodiment, the coating 14 of the core material 12 is deposited in a two-step process. An initial layer 18 is deposited on the core material 12 by positioning the core material 12 in the atomized stream 16 of coating material 48. In the case where the coating material 48 comprises a metal (e.g., a pure metal or a metal alloy), the deposition of the initial layer 18 is performed at a point in the atomized stream 16 wherein the solid fraction (i.e., the portion of the coating material 48 that is in a solid or frozen state) is about less than the liquid metal fraction (i.e., the portion of the coating material 48 that is in the liquid state) on a weight basis. In the embodiment illustrated in
In an alternative arrangement, separate cooling apparatus (not shown) could be provided to selectively cool the atomized stream 16 of coating material 48. Examples of such separate cooling apparatus are described in the referenced U.S. patents and will not be described in further detail herein. The separate cooling apparatus may be operated to provide a greater or lesser degree of cooling to the atomized stream 16, thereby allowing the liquid/solid ratio of the atomized stream 16 to be varied at a given distance from the nozzle 54. Thus, such separate cooling apparatus may dispense with the need to move the core material 12 relative to the atomized stream 16 in order to expose the core material 12 to the point in the atomized stream 16 having the desired liquid/solid ratio.
In one embodiment, the composition (i.e., the weight ratio of solid fraction to liquid fraction) of the coating material 48 contained in the atomized stream 16 is determined computationally from a model of the spray forming apparatus 34. That is, the relative amounts of the solid and liquid fractions of the coating material 48 contained in the atomized stream 16 are not actually measured, but rather are computationally determined based on a mathematical model of the spray forming apparatus. Consequently, the actual ratios of the solid and liquid fractions may differ somewhat from those determined computationally. However, such computational modeling is highly refined and generally provides highly accurate and definitive results.
Regardless of the particular manner in which the core material 12 is exposed to the atomized stream 16 at a point wherein the solid fraction is less than the liquid fraction of the coating material 48, so positioning the core material 12 improves the surface wetting and adhesion of the initial layer 18. Because the purpose of the initial layer 18 is to provide improved surface wetting and adhesion of the coating 14, the thickness of the initial layer 18 is not particularly critical, so long as the initial layer 18 has sufficient thickness to coat substantially the entirety of the exposed surface of the core material 12. Consequently, the present invention should not be regarded as limited to initial layers having any particular thicknesses. However, by way of example, in one embodiment wherein the coating material 48 comprises metal, the initial layer may have a thickness in a range of about 0.5 mm to about 3 mm (1 mm preferred).
After the initial layer 18 is deposited, the outer layer 20 is deposited on the initial layer 18 by positioning the core material 12 in the atomized stream 16 at a point wherein the solid fraction of the coating material 48 is greater than the liquid fraction of the coating material 48. In one embodiment, this may be accomplished by moving the core material 12 (and the deposited initial layer 18) to a position somewhat farther away from the nozzle 54. In another embodiment involving a separate cooling system, the cooling system could be operated so as to provide additional cooling, thus increase the proportionate amount of solid fraction to liquid fraction of coating material 48 contained in the atomized stream 16.
Regardless of the particular manner in which the core material 12 is exposed to the atomized stream 16 at a point wherein the solid fraction is greater than the liquid fraction of the coating material 48, so positioning the core material 12 results in the rapid deposition of the outer layer 20 and tends to result in a more favorable coating micro-structure. That is, the micro-structure of spray-formed metals and metal alloys and the non-equilibrium solidification associated therewith tends to limit segregation and results in a higher degree of equi-axial grain formation. In addition, constituent-phase particle sizes tend to be somewhat finer than those found in wrought commercial material and significantly finer than cast material.
The outer layer 20 should be deposited on substantially all of the surfaces of the core material 12, so as to result in a coating 14 that encapsulates substantially the entirety of the core material 12. The deposition process may be conducted until the coating 14 has reached the desired thickness. As mentioned above, the coating 14 may be deposited in any of a range of thicknesses depending on the particular type of coating material 48, the type of core material 12, as well as on the desired performance of the armor system 10. Accordingly, the present invention should not be regarded as limited to coatings 14 having any particular thicknesses. However, notwithstanding the fact that the coating 14 may comprise any of a range of thicknesses, the performance of the armor system 10 can be enhanced when the thickness of the coating 14 bears some relation to the thickness of the core material 12.
For example, in the embodiment illustrated in
In another embodiment, the coating 14 of the core material 12 is deposited in a single-step process. In the single-step coating process, the deposition of the coating 14 is performed at a point in the atomized stream 16 wherein the solid fraction (i.e., the portion of the coating material 48 that is in a solid or frozen state) is generally greater than the liquid metal fraction (i.e., the portion of the coating material 48 that is in the liquid state) on a weight basis. Generally speaking, solid fraction amounts of at least about 50% (by weight) and more preferably generally greater than about 70% (by weight) solid fraction amounts will result in favorable coating properties. That is, single-step coating processes wherein the atomized stream 16 comprises a comparatively high solids fraction (e.g., greater than about 50% and more preferably greater than about 70% by weight) reduces the compressive stresses likely to be produced in the core material 12 after cooling. However, sufficient liquid fraction component (e.g., 30% to 50% by weight) should be provided to fill interstitial voids within the coating to provide a higher density, less porous coating 14. The coating 14 should be provided over substantially the entirety of the core material 12, that is, so that the core material 12 is substantially encapsulated by the coating 14. The coating 14 may be deposited to the thicknesses described herein.
After the coating 14 has been deposited on the core material 12, the coating may be compressed to consolidate and increase the density of the coating 14. In one embodiment, such compression or consolidation may be accomplished by positioning the coated armor system 10 in the press system 66. The press system 66 compresses the coating 14, thereby increasing its density. In one embodiment wherein the coating 14 comprises a metal, it is generally preferable to press the coating 14 as quickly as possible (e.g., within 5-10 seconds) following deposition of the outer layer 20. This allows the coating 14 to be compressed while the coating 14 is still comparatively soft. Besides uni-axial pressing, the coating 14 may also be compressed by other processes known in the art, such as, for example by hot isostatic pressing and by cold isostatic pressing. However, because such processes are well-known in the art and could be easily provided by persons having ordinary skill in the art after having become familiar with the teachings provided herein, the particular pressing processes and apparatus for performing those processes will not be described in further detail herein.
The pressure provided by the press system 66 may comprise any of a wide range of pressures suitable for compressing the coating material utilized in the particular application. Consequently, the present invention should not be regarded as limited to any particular pressures. However, by way of example, in one embodiment wherein the coating material 48 comprises a metal, the press system 66 provides an axial pressure in a range of about 1 MPa to about 100 MPa (30 MPa preferred).
After pressing or consolidation, the armor system 10 may be heat treated (e.g., annealed or hardened), as may be desired to provide the armor system 10 with the desired performance. However, because heat treating processes, such as annealing and hardening, are known in the art and could be readily provided by persons having ordinary skill in the art after having become familiar with the teachings provided herein, and after considering the desired performance of the armor system 10, the particular heat treating processes that may be performed on the armor system 10 will not be described in further detail herein.
Another method for producing the armor system 10 involves encapsulating substantially the entirety of the core material 12 with the coating 14 by positioning the core material 12 in the stream 16 of atomized coating material 48. The coating 14 may be applied in a single-step process, wherein substantially the entire coating 14 is applied at once. Alternatively, the coating 14 may be applied in the two-step process described above involving the deposition of an initial layer (e.g., layer 18) followed by the deposition of an outer layer (e.g., outer layer 20) in the manner already described.
An armor system 10 according to the present invention was manufactured in accordance with the teachings provided herein. The core material 12 was CoorsTek type AD90 alumina tile. The tile comprised a square configuration having side lengths of about 100 mm and a thickness of about 3.2 mm. The coating material comprised SAE 5083 aluminum alloy. The process chamber 36 was filled with a nitrogen gas atmosphere. The nitrogen gas was introduced into the process chamber 36 at about room temperature. The pressure within the process chamber 36 was maintained at a pressure of about 100 kPa.
Molten 5083 aluminum alloy was provided to the coating material feed assembly 44 and maintained at a temperature of about 750° C., which is about 100° C. above the liquidus temperature for the alloy. The atomizing gas comprised nitrogen and was provided to the inlet (i.e., converging section 56) of nozzle 54 at a total temperature of about 700° C. and a total pressure of about 150 kPa. The nitrogen atomized the molten aluminum alloy, forming an atomized stream 16 of molten 5083 aluminum alloy. The alumina core material 12 was pre-heated to a temperature of about 500° C. before deposition by placing the alumina core material 12 in the core heating system 64.
An initial metal layer 18 was deposited on all surfaces of the alumina tile core material 12 by positioning the alumina tile in the atomized stream 16 at a distance approximately 20 cm from the nozzle 54. At this distance, theoretical calculations indicated that the liquid metal fraction of the aluminum alloy contained in the atomized stream 16 should be about equal to the solid metal fraction of the aluminum alloy contained in the atomized stream 16. An initial metal layer was deposited to a thickness of about 1 mm. An outer layer 20 was then deposited on the initial layer 18 by moving the alumina tile away from the nozzle 54 until it was located a distance of about 30-38 cm from the nozzle 54. At this distance, theoretical calculations indicated that the solid metal fraction of the atomized stream 16 comprised about 70% on a weight basis. The deposition process was continued until the coating 14 was deposited to a thickness sufficient to achieve the following thicknesses after machining (for coating uniformity):
Front: 3.2 mm
Side: 6.4 mm
Back: 6.4 mm
The line-of-sight (LOS) areal density at the center of the armor system was estimated to be about 39 kg/m2 (8 lb/sq ft). The overall dimensions of the armor system 10, after machining for uniformity were about 11.4 cm×11.4 cm×1.3 cm. Thereafter, the armor system 10 was annealed at a temperature of about 415° C. for a time of about 4 hours.
The properties of the 5083 aluminum alloy formed by the spray deposition process described herein have been determined as follows:
The armor system 10 was live-fire tested in accordance with MIL-STD-662 to verify ballistic performance. The armor system 10 was impacted at a stand-off of about 6.25 m and at zero degrees obliquity (i.e., perpendicular to the front surface of the armor system). The test round was a 7.62×39 mm 1943 PS ball with a mild steel core. The powder was reloaded to ensure a muzzle velocity of 725±7.6 m/s. A 6061 aluminum witness block was placed behind the armor system 10 to capture any behind-armor debris. The witness block was not mechanically fastened to the armor system 10.
The results of the live-fire test on the armor system are presented in
Having herein set forth preferred embodiments of the present invention, it is anticipated that suitable modifications can be made thereto which will nonetheless remain within the scope of the invention. The invention shall therefore only be construed in accordance with the following claims:
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/992,521, filed Nov. 17, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,838,079, issued Nov. 23, 2010, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by this reference in its entirety. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/893,160, filed Sep. 29, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,377,512, issued Feb. 19, 2013, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/893,173, filed Sep. 29, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,231,963, issued Jul. 31, 2012, each of which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/992,521, filed Nov. 17, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,838,079, issued Nov. 23, 2010.
This invention was made with government support under Contract Numbers DE-AC07-99ID13727 and DE-AC07-05ID14517 awarded by the United States Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4232056 | Grant et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4704943 | McDougal | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4987033 | Abkowitz et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5196240 | Stockwell | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5235895 | Vanark et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5401539 | Coombs et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5445324 | Berry et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5483864 | Vanark et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5677029 | Prevorsek et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5718863 | McHugh et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 6074194 | McHugh | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6224943 | Knepper et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6271162 | Haug et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6284014 | Carden | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6389594 | Yavin | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6635357 | Moxson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6656570 | Fels et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6679157 | Chu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6746225 | McHugh | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6895851 | Adams et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 7838079 | Chu et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 20020058107 | Fareed et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058576 | Mazany et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020088340 | Chu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160198 | Oshima et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020178672 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020178900 | Ghiorse et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030064191 | Fisher | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134134 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040115477 | Nesbitt | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229031 | Gell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20070111621 | Barsoum et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 03078158 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report for PCT/US05/39815 mailed Aug. 20, 2007, 2 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110020538 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10992521 | Nov 2004 | US |
| Child | 12893192 | US |
