The technical field of the invention is that of body shell structures of armoured vehicles and the leaves thereof.
Conventionally, the known armoured vehicles, such as that disclosed in WO201122295 or that represented in
Considering the thickness of the glazing 10 and 11 and the weight thereof, they require fixing frames 9 allowing to robustly make the glazing 10 and 11 integral with the walls of the body shell of the vehicle 100.
Each frame 9 comprises a support surface 9a, surrounding the frame of the glazing 10 or 11 and substantially parallel to the plane of the glazing 10 or 11. This support surface 9a is necessary and serves as an area for fixing the frame 9 equipped with the glazing 10 or 11 with the body shell of the vehicle 100. Thus, if considering a vehicle windscreen 11, the entire front face of the vehicle cannot be occupied by the glazing 11, because space must be provided to receive the support surface 9a, thereby reducing the field of view of an occupant 1 within the vehicle. The problem is similar for glazing 10 which are on the side walls 20 of the body shell.
In
A simple reduction of the width of the struts would cause a reduction of the mechanical strength of the struts, thus of the protection of the vehicle. In addition, a simple reduction of the struts would not necessarily allow to have enough space to receive the support surfaces of the struts 9a.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,061,788 discloses a civilian motor vehicle comprising windscreen struts profiled for improving the field of view of the occupants. Each strut enters into the cab interior and extends to a rear end which also forms the edge of the opening closed by the door. Thus situated the junction between the struts and the front face is at a distance from the edge of the opening. However, such assembly does not allow to optimally withstand the effects of lateral explosions.
The aim of the invention is to improve the field of view of the occupant of the vehicle by reducing the masking angle M due to the strut 20a without reducing the ballistic protection performance of the vehicle (in particular with respect to the blast effects of explosive devices).
An advantage of the invention is to improve the ballistic support of a side wall of the body shell in case of blast of a lateral explosion.
Another advantage of the invention is to improve the accessibility to the vehicle.
Thus, the invention relates to a body shell of an armoured vehicle comprising:
a front face carrying a bulletproof windscreen projecting towards the outside of the body shell,
at least one side wall comprising an opening, said side wall being integral with the front face at a strut which is defined by a part of the side wall comprised between an edge of the opening and a rim of the side wall situated furthest outwards at the front of the vehicle, the armoured vehicle body shell being characterized in that:
Advantageously, the opening is intended to be closed by a glazed leaf.
Advantageously, the opening is intended to be closed by a glazing.
According to a feature of the invention, the glazed leaf comprises a door covering the opening of the side wall, said door comprising a glazed part at least one of the edges of which is situated at the vicinity of the edge of the opening situated near the front face.
According to another feature of the invention, the strut extends towards the outside of the body shell with a width L at least equal to the thickness of the windscreen.
The invention will become more apparent upon reading the following description, description illustrated with the appended drawings, in which:
According to
It can be noted that the strut 20a extends beyond the front face 40 towards the front of the body, and thus at least partially covers the thickness of the windscreen 11.
With respect to the prior art shown in
The opening 21 closed by a door 30 is represented in
The door 30 comprises a glazing 10 integral with the door 30 by a frame 9 pressing the glazing 10 on the door 30 by means of a support surface 9a.
It can be noted, in
Thus, the glazed area 10 is moved forward as much as possible to the front of the vehicle 100. This has the effect of clearing the view in this observation direction with respect to a glazing according to the prior art.
Thus, in
According to the invention, the junction between the strut 20a and the front face 40 of the vehicle is made in the vicinity of the rear edge 22 of the strut 20a, and not in the vicinity of the front rim 23, namely at a distance from the edge 22 which is lower than 50% of the width of the strut 20a. This reduces the cantilever between this rear edge 22 and the front face 40 in comparison with the prior art, such as in
This reduction of the cantilever allows to limit the stresses on the strut due to the blast generated by an explosion on the side of the vehicle.
It is obvious to the person skilled in the art that the invention can be applied to a vehicle which does not comprise a door, but only a lateral glazing. In this case, the strut 20a which extends towards the front of the vehicle allows to receive the support surface 9a of the frame 9 of the lateral glazing, thereby allowing to move forward the transparent part of the lateral glazing as close as possible to the front face 40 and thus improving the visibility.
It is also obvious to the person skilled in the art that this strut solution according to the invention can be used for other parts of the vehicle body, for example for glazing arranged to the rear of the body. In this case, it will be considered in the previous description that the front face is a rear face of the vehicle.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13 00147 | Jan 2013 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2014/050069 | 1/14/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/111652 | 7/24/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1854210 | Mercer | Apr 1932 | A |
2061788 | Wright | Nov 1936 | A |
3586236 | Schaffler | Jun 1971 | A |
4351558 | Mueller | Sep 1982 | A |
7712409 | Cunningham | May 2010 | B2 |
20110303817 | Adams | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19945589 | Mar 2001 | DE |
2258917 | Dec 2010 | EP |
Entry |
---|
May 16, 2014 Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/FR2014/050069. |
May 16, 2014 International Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/FR2014/050069. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150354927 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |