Aromatic hydrocarbon isomer separation process

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The field of art to which the claimed invention pertains is hydrocarbon separation. More specifically, the invention relates to a process for separating a para-isomer from a feed mixture comprising at least two bi-alkyl substituted monocyclic aromatic isomers, including the para-isomer, the isomers having from 8 to about 18 carbon atoms per molecule which process employs a particular zeolitic adsorbent which selectively removes the para-isomer from the feed.
2. Description of the Prior Art
It is well known in the separation art that certain crystalline aluminosilicates can be used to separate one hydrocarbon type from another hydrocarbon type. The separation of normal paraffins from branched chained paraffins for example can be accomplished by using a type A zeolite which has pore openings from 3 to about 5 Angstroms. Such a separation process is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,985,589 and 3,201,491. These adsorbents allow a separation based on the physical size differences in the molecules by allowing the smaller or normal hydrocarbons to be passed into the cavities within the zeolitic adsorbent, while excluding the larger or branched chain molecules. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,265,750 and 3,510,423 for example disclose processes in which larger pore diameter zeolites such as the type X or type Y structured zeolites can be used to separate olefinic hydrocarbons from non-olefinic hydrocarbons.
In addition to being used in processes for separating hydrocarbon types, adsorbents comprising type X or Y zeolites have also been employed in processes to separate individual hydrocarbon isomers. In the processes described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,558,730, 3,558,732; 3,626,020 and 3,686,342 for example particular zeolitic adsorbents are used to separate desired xylene isomers; in U.S. Pat. No. 3,114,782 they are used to separate alkyl-trisubstituted benzenes; in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,864,416 they are used to separate tetraalkyl substituted aromatic hydrocarbon isomers and in U.S. Pat. No. 3,668,267 they are used to separate particular alkyl substituted naphthalenes.
The present process relates to a process for the separation of the para-isomer from a hydrocarbon feed mixture comprising at least two bi-alkyl substituted monocyclic aromatic isomers, including the paraisomer, the isomers having from 8 to about 18 carbon atoms per molecule. We have found adsorbents comprising type Y zeolites essentially completely exchanged with a single cation selected from the group consisting of potassium, cesium, and rubidium exhibit selectivity for the para-isomer and possess other desired characteristics thereby making separation of the para-isomer by solid-bed selective adsorption processes possible.
The process is particularly useful in separating para-diethylbenzene and para-cymene from feed mixtures containing diethylbenzene isomers and cymene isomers respectively.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is, accordingly, a broad objective of our invention to provide a process for the separation of a para-isomer from a feed mixture comprising at least two bi-alkyl substituted monocyclic aromatic isomers, including the para-isomer, the isomers having from 8 to about 18 carbon atoms per molecule. More specifically it is an objective of our invention to provide a process for the separation of such para-isomers as paradiethylbenzene and para-cymene from feed mixtures containing diethylbenzene isomers and cymene isomers respectively.
In brief summary our invention is, in one embodiment, a process for separating a para-isomer from a feed mixture comprising at least two bi-alkyl substituted monocyclic aromatic isomers, including a para-isomer, said isomers having more than eight and less than about 18 carbon atoms per molecule, which process comprises contacting at adsorption conditions said feed with an adsorbent comprising a type Y zeolite essentially completely exchanged with a single cation selected from the group consisting of potassium, cesium, and rubidium to effect the adsorption of a para-isomer and thereafter recovering a para-isomer.
In another embodiment our invention is a process for separating a para-isomer from a feed mixture comprising at least bi-alkyl monosubstituted aromatic isomers, including a para-isomer, said isomers having more than eight and less than about eighteen carbon atoms per molecule which process comprises the steps of: (a) contacting said feed stream at adsorption conditions with an adsorbent comprising a type Y zeolite essentially completely exchanged with a single cation selected from the group consisting of potassium, cesium, and rubidium to effect the selective adsorption of a para-isomer; (b) removing a raffinate component comprising a less selectively adsorbed isomer from said adsorbent; (c) contacting said adsorbent with a desorbent material at desorption conditions to effect the desorption of a para-isomer from said adsorbent; and, (d) removing from said adsorbent an extract stream comprising a para-isomer.
In still another embodiment of our invention is a process for separating a para-isomer from a feed stream comprising at least two bialkyl monosubstituted aromatic isomers, including a para-isomer, said isomers having more than eight and less than about eighteen carbon atoms per molecule which process employs an adsorbent comprising a type Y zeolite essentially completely exchanged with a single cation selected from the group consisting of potassium, cesium and rubidium and which process comprises the steps of: (a) maintaining net fluid flow through a column of said adsorbent in a single direction, which column contains at least three zones having separate operational functions occurring therein and being serially interconnected with the terminal zones of said column connected to provide a continuous connection of said zones; (b) maintaining an adsorption zone in said column, said zone defined by the adsorbent located between a feed input stream at an upstream boundary of said zone and a raffinate output stream at a downstream boundary of said zone; (c) maintaining a purification zone immediately upstream from said adsorption zone, said purification zone defined by the adsorbent located between an extract output stream at an upstream boundary of said purification zone and said feed input stream at a downstream boundary of said purification zone; (d) maintaining a desorption zone immediately upstream from said purification zone, said desorption zone defined by the adsorbent located between a desorbent input stream at an upstream boundary of said zone and said extract output stream at a downstream boundary of said zone; (e) passing said feed stream into said adsorption zone at adsorption conditions to effect the selective adsorption of a para-isomer by said adsorbent in said adsorption zone and withdrawing a raffinate output stream from said adsorption zone; (f) passing a desorbent material having a boiling point different than that of the feed mixture to permit separation therefrom by distillation into said desorption zone at desorption conditions to effect the displacement of said para-isomer from the adsorbent in said desorption zone; (g) withdrawing an extract stream comprising said paraisomer and desorbent material from said desorption zone; (h) passing at least a portion of said extract output stream to a fractionation means and therein fractionating at fractionation conditions said para-isomer from said desorbent material to produce a para-isomer product substantially free of desorbent material; and (i) periodically advancing through said column of adsorbent in a downstream direction with respect to fluid flow in said adsorption zone the feed input stream, raffinate output stream, desorbent input stream, and extract output stream to effect the shifting of zones through said adsorbent and the production of extract output and raffinate output streams.
Other objects and embodiments of the present invention encompass details about feed mixtures, adsorbents, desorbent materials and operating conditions all of which are hereinafter disclosed in the following discussion of each of the facets of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In order to gain a better understanding of the process of this invention, the following definitions of terms that appear in this specification are given.
The term "feed stream" indicates a stream in the process through which feed mixture or material passes to the adsorbent. A feed mixture comprises one or more extract components and one or more raffinate components.
An "extract component" is a type of compound or a compound, such as an aromatic isomer, that is more selectively adsorbed by the adsorbent while a "raffinate component" is a compound or type of compound that is less selectively adsorbed. In this process, the para-isomer is the extract component and one or more other aromatic isomer is a raffinate component. The term "raffinate stream" or "raffinate output stream" means a stream through which most of the raffinate components are removed from the adsorbent. The composition of the raffinate stream can vary from essentially 100% desorbent material to essentially 100% raffinate components. The term "extract stream" or "extract output stream" shall mean a stream through which an extract material which has been desorbed by a desorbent material is removed from the adsorbent. The composition of the extract stream, likewise, can vary from essentially 100% desorbent material to essentially 100% extract components. Although it is possible by the process of this invention to produce high purity (98% or greater), paraisomer product at high recoveries, it will be appreciated that an extract component is never completely adsorbed by the adsorbent, nor is a raffinate component completely non-adsorbed by the adsorbent. Therefore, small amounts of a raffinate component can appear in the extract stream, and, likewise, small amounts of an extract component can appear in the raffinate stream. The extract and raffinate streams then are further distinguished from each other and from the feed mixture by the ratio of the concentrations of an extract component and a specific raffinate component, both appearing in the particular stream. For example, the ratio of concentration of the more selectively adsorbed para-isomer to the concentration of less selectively adsorbed meta-isomer will be highest in the extract stream, next highest in the feed mixture, and lowest in the raffinate stream. Likewise, the ratio of the less selectively adsorbed meta-isomer to the more selectively adsorbed para-isomer will be highest in the raffinate stream, next highest in the feed mixture, and the lowest in the extract stream.
The term "desorbent material" shall mean generally a material capable of desorbing an extract component. The term "desorbent stream" or "desorbent input stream" indicates the stream through which desorbent material passes to the adsorbent.
The term "selective pore volume" of the adsorbent is defined as the volume of the adsorbent which selectively adsorbs extract components from the feed stock. The term "non-selective void volume" of the adsorbent is the volume of the adsorbent which does not selectively retain extract components from the feed stock. This volume includes the cavities of the adsorbent which contain no adsorptive sites and the interstitial void spaces between adsorbent particles. The selective pore volume and the non-selective void volume are generally expressed in volumetric quantities and are of importance in determining the proper flow rates of fluid required to be passed into the process for efficient operations to take place for a given quantity of adsorbent.
When adsorbent "passes" into an operational zone (which zones are used in one embodiment of this process and are hereinafter defined and described) its non-selective void volume together with its selective pore volume carries fluid into that zone. The non-selective void volume is utilized in determining the amount of fluid which should pass into the same zone in a countercurrent direction to the adsorbent to displace the fluid present in the non-selective void volume. If the fluid flow rate passing into a zone is smaller than the non-selective void volume rate of adsorbent material passing into that zone, there is a net entrainment of liquid into the zone by the adsorbent. Since this net entrainment is a fluid present in non-selective void volume of the adsorbent, it in most instances comprises less selectively retained feed mixture components.
The selective pore volume of an adsorbent can in certain instances adsorb portions of raffinate material from the fluid surrounding the adsorbent since in certain instances there is competition between extract material and raffinate material for adsorptive sites within the selective pore volume. If a large quantity of raffinate material with respect to extract material surrounds the adsorbent, raffinate material can be competitive enough to be adsorbed by the adsorbent.
Feed mixtures which can be utilized in the process of this invention will comprise at least two bi-alkyl substituted monocyclic aromatic isomers. These isomers can be characterized by reference to Formula 1 below: ##STR1## wherein R.sub.1, R.sub.2, R.sub.3 and R.sub.4 are selected from the group of alkyl chains and positioned in a manner to provide bi-alkyl substitution at either ortho-, meta-, or para-isomer positions. The R substitutional groups can include alkyl groups ranging from methyl substitution groups up to and including chains having 11 or less carbon atoms per chain. The alkyl side chains can be both normal and branched in nature and are preferably saturated chains.
Thus feed mixtures to this process can contain such specific representative compounds as the various isomers of methylethylbenzene, diethylbenzene, isopropyltoluene (cymene), the methylpropylbenzenes, ethylpropylbenzenes, methylbutylbenzenes, ethylbutylbenzene, dipropylbenzenes, methylpentylbenzene, etc., and combinations thereof. The above list only represents a small fraction of compounds whose isomers can be separated by the adsorptive-separation process of this invention. Thus the process of this invention will be used for example to separate para-methylethylbenzene from a feed mixture comprising para-methylethylbenzene and at least one other methylethylbenzene isomer; para-diethylbenzene from a feed mixture comprising para-diethylbenzene and at least one other diethylbenzene isomer; and para-cymene from a feed mixture comprising para-cymene and at least one other cymene isomer to name a few.
The isomers of such compounds are separated by this adsorbent according to their configuration depending whether they are of a para-, meta-, or ortho-isomer construction. Specifically, the para-isomer is selectively adsorbed relative to the other isomers. It is contemplated that when feed mixtures contain more than one homolog of isomers (for example, C.sub.9 isomers in mixture with C.sub.10 or C.sub.11 isomers) molecular weight differences may unduly interfere with selective adsorption based upon isomer configuration differences. It is therefore preferred that feed mixtures to be separated by this process contain only a single class of aromatic isomers, that is, aromatic isomers having an equal number of carbon atoms per molecule. It is preferable that the isomers have as their only differences the location of the alkyl substituted groups in a para-, meta-, or ortho-position. The alkyl structures should preferably be the same for each isomer of a class. In some instances an isomer may have alkyl chains which are both normal or branched or one branched and one normal.
The feed mixtures may contain small quantities of straight or branched chain paraffins, cycloparaffins, or olefinic material. It is preferable to have these quantities at a minimum amount in order to prevent contamination of products from this process by materials which are not selectively adsorbed or separated by the adsorbent. Preferably the above-mentioned contaminants should be less than about 20% of the volume of the feed mixture passed into the process.
To separate the para-isomer from a feed mixture containing paraisomer and at least one other aromatic isomer the mixture is contacted with the particular adsorbent and the para-isomer is more selectively adsorbed and retained by the adsorbent while the other isomers are relatively unadsorbed and are removed from the interstitial void spaces between the particles of adsorbent and the surface of the adsorbent. The adsorbent containing the more selectively adsorbed para-isomer is referred as a "rich" adsorbent -- rich in the more selectively adsorbed para-isomer.
The adsorbent can be contained in one or more chambers where through programmed flow into and out of the chambers separation of paraisomer is effected. The adsorbent will preferably be contacted with a desorbent material which is capable of displacing the adsorbed para-isomer from the adsorbent and an extract stream comprising the para-isomer and desorbent material will be withdrawn from the adsorbent. Desorbent material will thereafter be separated leaving high purity para-isomer product. Alternatively, the para-isomer could be removed from the adsorbent by purging or by increasing the temperature of the adsorbent or by decreasing the pressure of the chamber or vessel containing the adsorbent or by a combination of these means.
The adsorbent may be employed in the form of a dense compact fixed bed which is alternatively contacted with the feed mixture and a desorbent material (hereinafter described in more detail). In the simplest embodiment of the invention the adsorbent is employed in the form of a single static bed in which case the process is only semi-continuous. A set of two or more static beds may be employed in fixed-bed contacting with appropriate valving so that the feed mixture is passed through one or more adsorbent beds while the desorbent material is passed through one or more of the other beds in the set. The flow of feed mixture and desorbent material may be either up or down through the desorbent. Any of the conventional apparatus employed in static bed fluid-solid contacting may be used.
Countercurrent moving-bed or simulated moving-bed countercurrent flow systems, however, have a much greater separation efficiency than fixed adsorbent bed systems and are therefore preferred. In the moving-bed or simulated moving-bed processes the adsorption and desorption operations are continuously taking place which allows both continuous production of an extract and a raffinate stream and the continual use of feed and desorbent streams. One preferred processing flow scheme which can be utilized to effect the process of this invention includes what is known in the art as the simulated moving-bed countercurrent flow system. The operating principles and sequence of such a flow system are described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,985,589 issued to D. B. Broughton. In such a system it is the progressive movement of multiple liquid access points down an adsorbent chamber that simulates the upward movement of adsorbent contained in the chamber. Only four of the access lines are active at any one time; the feed in, desorbent in, raffinate stream out, and extract stream out access lines. Coincident with this simulated upward movement of the solid adsorbent is the movement of the liquid occupying the void volume of the packed bed of adsorbent. So that countercurrent contact is maintained, a liquid flow down the adsorbent chamber is provided by a pump. As an active liquid access point moves through a cycle, that is, from the top of the chamber to the bottom, the chamber circulation pump moves through different zones which require different flow rates. A programmed flow controller is provided to set and regulate these flow rates.
The active liquid access points effectively divided the adsorbent chamber into separate zones, each of which has a different function. In this embodiment of our process it is generally necessary that three separate operational zones be present in order for the process to take place although in some instances an optional fourth zone may be used.
The adsorption zone, zone 1, is defined as the adsorbent located between the feed inlet stream and the raffinate outlet stream. In this zone, the feed stock contacts the adsorbent, an extract component is adsorbed, and a raffinate stream is withdrawn. Since the general flow through zone 1 is from the feed stream which passes into the zone to the raffinate stream which passes out of the zone, the flow in this zone is considered to be a downstream direction when proceeding from the feed inlet to the raffinate outlet streams.
Immediately upstream with respect to fluid flow in zone 1 is the purification zone, zone 2. The purification zone is defined as the adsorbent between the extract outlet stream and the feed inlet stream. The basic operations taking place in zone 2 are the displacement from the non-selective void volume of the adsorbent of any raffinate material carried into zone 2 by the shifting of adsorbent into this zone and the desorption of any raffinate material adsorbed within the selective pore volume of the adsorbent adsorbed on the surfaces of the adsorbent particles. Purification is achieved by passing a portion of extract stream material leaving zone 3 into zone 2 at zone 2's upstream boundary the extract outlet stream to effect the displacement of raffinate material. The flow of material in zone 2 is in a downstream direction from the extract outlet stream to the feed inlet stream.
Immediately upstream of zone 2 with respect to the fluid flowing in zone 2 is the desorption zone or zone 3. The desorption zone is defined as the adsorbent between the desorbent inlet and the extract outlet stream. The function of the desorption zone is to allow desorbent material which passes into this zone to displace the extract components which were adsorbed upon the adsorbent during a previous contact with feed in zone 1 in a prior cycle of operation. The flow of fluid in zone 3 is essentially in the same direction as that of zones 1 and 2.
In some instances an optional buffer zone, zone 4, may be utilized. This zone, defined as the adsorbent between the raffinate outlet stream and the desorbent inlet stream, if used, is located immediately upstream with respect to the fluid flow to zone 3. Zone 4 would be utilized to conserve the amount of desorbent utilized in the desorption step since a portion of the raffinate stream which is removed from zone 1 can be passed into zone 4 to displace desorbent material present in that zone out of that zone into the desorption zone. Zone 4 will contain enough adsorbent so that raffinate material present in the raffinate stream passing out of zone 1 and into zone 4 can be prevented from passing into zone 3 thereby contaminating extract stream removed from zone 3. In the instances in which the fourth operational zone is not utilized the raffinate stream passed from zone 1 to zone 4 must be carefully monitored in order that the flow directly from zone 1 to zone 3 can be stopped when there is an appreciable quantity of raffinate material present in the raffinate stream passing from zone 1 to zone 3 so that the extract outlet stream is not contaminated.
A cyclic advancement of the input and output streams through the fixed bed of adsorbent can be accomplished by utilizing a manifold system in which the valves in the manifold are operated in a sequential manner to effect the shifting of the input and output streams thereby allowing a flow of fluid with respect to solid adsorbent in a countercurrent manner. Another mode of operation which can effect the countercurrent flow of solid adsorbent with respect to fluid involves the use of a rotating disc valve in which the input and output streams are connected to the valve and the lines through which feed input, extract output, desorbent input, raffinate product recycle and raffinate output streams pass are advanced in the same direction through the adsorbent bed. Both the manifold arrangement and disc valve are known in the art. Specifically rotary disc valves which can be utilized in this operation can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,040,777 and 3,422,848. Both of the aforementioned patents disclose a rotary type connection valve in which the suitable advancement of the various input and output streams from fixed sources can be achieved without difficulty.
In many instances, one operational zone will contain a much larger quantity of adsorbent than some other operational zone. For instance, in some operations the buffer zone can contain a minor amount of adsorbent as compared to the adsorbent required for the adsorption and purification zones. It can also be seen that in instances in which desorbent is used which can easily desorb extract material from the adsorbent that a relatively small amount of adsorbent will be needed in a desorption zone as compared to the adsorbent needed in the buffer zone or adsorption zone or purification zone or all of them. Since it is not required that the adsorbent be located in a single column, the use of multiple chambers or a series of columns is within the scope of the invention.
It is not necessary that all of the input or output streams be simultaneously used, and in fact, in many instances some of the streams can be shut off while others effect an input or output of material. The apparatus which can be utilized to effect the process of this invention can also contain a series of individual beds connected by connecting conduits upon which are placed input or output taps to which the various input or output streams can be attached and alternately and periodically shifted to effect continuous operation. In some instances, the connecting conduits can be connected to transfer taps which during the normal operations do not function as a conduit through which material passes into or out of the process.
It is contemplated that at least a portion of the extract output stream wll pass into a separation means wherein desorbent material can be separated to produce an extract product (para-isomer) substantially free of desorbent material. Additionally, at least a portion of the raffinate output stream will also be passed to a separation means wherein desorbent material can be separated for reuse in the process and a raffinate product substantially free of desorbent material can be produced. The term "substantially free" shall mean that the concentration of desorbent material in either the extract product or the raffinate product shall be less than about 5 vol. % and more preferably less than about 1 vol. %. The separation means will typically be a fractionation column, the design and operation of which is well known to the separation art.
Reference can be made to D. B. Broughton U.S. Pat. No. 2,985,589, and to a paper entitled "Continuous Adsorptive Processing -- A New Separation Technique" by D. B. Broughton presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Society of Chemical Engineers at Tokyo, Japan on Apr. 2, 1969, for further explanation of the simulated moving-bed countercurrent process flow scheme.
Although both liquid and vapor phase operations can be used in many adsorptive separation processes, liquid-phase operation is preferred for this process because of the lower temperature requirements and because of the higher yields of para-isomer product that can be obtained with liquid-phase operation over those obtained with vapor-phase operation. Preferred adsorption conditions for this process will include temperatures within the range of from about 20.degree. to about 250.degree. C. and will include pressures in the range from about atmospheric to about 500 psig to insure liquid phase. Pressures higher than about 500 psig do not appear to affect the selectivity to a measurable amount and additionally would increase the cost of the process. Desorption conditions for the process of the invention shall generally include the same range of temperatures and pressures as described for adsorption operations.
The desorbent materials which can be used in this process will vary depending on the type of operation employed. The term "desorbent material" as used herein shall mean any fluid substance capable of removing a selectively adsorbed feed component from the adsorbent. In the swing-bed system in which the selectively adsorbed feed component is removed from the adsorbent by a purge stream, desorbent materials comprising gaseous hydrocarbons such as methane, ethane, etc., or other types of gases such as nitrogen or hydrogen may be used at elevated temperatures or reduced pressures or both to effectively purge the adsorbed feed component from the adsorbent.
However, in adsorptive separation processes which employ zeolitic adsorbents and which are generally operated at substantially constant pressures and temperatures to insure liquid phase, the desorbent material relied upon must be judiciously selected to satisfy several criteria. First the desorbent material must displace the extract components from the adsorbent with reasonable mass flow rates without itself being so strongly adsorbed as to unduly prevent the extract component from displacing the desorbent material in a following adsorption cycle. Expressed in terms of the selectivity (hereinafter discussed in more detail), it is preferred that the adsorbent be more selective for the extract component with respect to a raffinate component than it is for the desorbent material with respect to a raffinate component. Secondly, desorbent materials must be compatible with the particular adsorbent and the particular feed mixture. More specifically, they must not reduce or destroy the critical selectivity of the adsorbent for the extract components with respect to the raffinate component.
Desorbent materials to be used in the process of this invention should additionally be substances which are easily separable from the feed mixture that is passed into the process. After desorbing the extract components of the feed, both desorbent material and the extract components are removed in admixture from the adsorbent. Likewise, one or more raffinate components is withdrawn from the adsorbent in admixture with desorbent material. Without a method of separating desorbent material, such as distillation, the purity of neither the extract components nor the raffinate component would not be very high. It is therefore contemplated that any desorbent material used in this process will have a substantially different average boiling point than that of the feed mixture. The use of a desorbent material having a substantially different average boiling point than that of the feed allows separation of desorbent material from feed components in the extract and raffinate streams by simple fractionation thereby permitting reuse of desorbent material in the process. The term "substantially different" as used herein shall mean that the difference between the average boiling points between the desorbent material and the feed mixture shall be at least about 15.degree. F. The boiling range of the desorbent material may be higher or lower than that of the feed mixture.
In the preferred isothermal, isobaric, liquid-phase operation of the process of our invention, we have found that desorbent materials comprising mono-aromatic hydrocarbons having average boiling points substantially different from that of a feed mixture meet these requirements and are particularly effective. Especially preferred for this process are desorbent materials comprising toluene or diethylbenzene. Usually one of these preferred desorbent materials or the other can be employed with a particular feed mixture such that the requirement of substantially different average boiling points is met. When the desorbent material comprises diethylbenzene it is preferred that the desorbent material contain only para-diethylbenzene and no other diethylbenzene isomer. Typical concentrations of para-diethylbenzene when para-diethylbenzene is the sole diethylbenzene isomer present in the desorbent material can range from a few volume percent up to about 100 volume percent. More preferably the para-diethylbenzene concentration will be from about 50 to about 75 vol. % of the desorbent material. Diethylbenzene-containing desorbent materials can also comprise mixed diethylbenzenes, one of which will contain roughly about 60 vol. % meta-diethylbenzene, 7 vol. % ortho-diethylbenzene, and 26 vol. % para-diethylbenzene along with approximately 7 vol. % of butylbenzenes. Mixtures comprising toluene or diethylbenzene (either paradiethylbenzene of mixed diethylbenzenes) and diluents are also effective as desorbent materials. Such diluents must be compatible with the adsorbent and feed mixture as described above and must be easily separable from the feed mixture. Diluents which can be used include materials such as saturated hydrocarbons, including paraffins and cycloparaffins and additionally the carbo-cyclic ring compounds. Typically, the paraffins will be straight or branched-chain paraffins having from about 5 to about 20 carbon atoms per molecule and more preferably from about 5 to about 15 carbon atoms per molecule. Cycloparaffins can include the cyclohexane, cyclopentanes, and branched derivatives thereof. Additionally carbo-cyclic ring compounds including Decalin and Decalin derivatives containing branched chains can be utilized. Typical concentrations of toluene or diethylbenzene in such mixtures can be from a few volume percent up to near 100 vol. % of the total desorbent material mixture but such concentrations preferably will be within the range of from about 50 vol. % to about 100 vol. % of the mixture.
With the operation of our process now in mind, one can appreciate that certain characteristics of adsorbents are highly desirable, if not absolutely necessary, to the successful operation of a selective adsorption process. Among such characteristics are: adsorptive capacity for some volume of an extract component per volume of adsorbent; the selective adsorption of an extract component with respect to a raffinate component and the desorbent material; and sufficiently fast rates of adsorption and desorption of the extract components to and from the absorbent.
Capacity of the adsorbent for adsorbing a specific volume of one or more extract component is, of course, a necessity; without such capacity the adsorbent is useless for adsorptive separation. Furthermore, the higher the adsorbent's capacity for an extract component the better is the adsorbent. Increased capacity of a particular adsorbent makes it possible to reduce the amount of adsorbent needed to separate the extract component contained in a particular charge rate of feed mixture. A reduction in the amount of adsorbent required for a specific adsorptive separation reduces the cost of the separation process. It is important that the good initial capacity of the adsorbent be maintained during actual use in the separation process over some economically desirable life.
The second necessary adsorbent characteristic is the ability of the adsorbent to separate components of the feed; or, in other words, that the adsorbent possess adsorptive selectivity, (B), for one component as compared to another component. Relative selectivity can be expressed not only for one feed component as compared to another but also can be expressed between any feed mixture component and the desorbent material. The selectivity, (B), as used throughout this specification is defined as the ratio of the two components of the adsorbed phase over the ratio of the same two components in the unadsorbed phase at equilibrium conditions.
Relative selectivity is shown as Equation 1 below:

EQUATION 1 ##STR2## where C and D are two components of the feed represented in volume percent and the subscripts A and U represent the adsorbed and unadsorbed phases respectively. The equilibrium conditions were determined when the feed passing over a bed of adsorbent did not change composition after contacting the bed of adsorbent. In other words, there was no net transfer of material occurring between the unadsorbed and adsorbed phases.
Where selectively of two components approaches 1.0 there is no preferential adsorption of one component by the adsorbent with respect to the other; they are both adsorbed (or non-adsorbed) to about the same degree with respect to each other. As the (B) becomes less than or greater than 1.0 there is a perferential adsorption by the adsorbent for one component with respect to the other. When comparing the selectivity by the adsorbent of one component C over component D, a (B) larger than 1.0 indicates preferential adsorption of component C within the adsorbent. A (B) less than 1.0 would indicate that component D is preferentially adsorbed leaving an unadsorbed phase richer in component C and an adsorbed phase richer in component D. While separation of a extract component from a raffinate component is theoretically possible when the selectivity of the adsorbent for the extract component with respect to the raffinate component just exceeds a value of 1.0, it is preferred that such selectivity have a value approaching or exceeding 2. Like relative volatility, the higher the selectivity the easier the separation is to perform. Higher selectivities permit a smaller amount of adsorbent to be used in the process. Ideally desorbent materials should have a selectivity equal to about 1 or less than 1 with respect to all extract components so that all of the extract components can be extracted as a class and all raffinate components clearly rejected into the raffinate stream.
The third important characteristic is the rate of exchange of the extract component of the feed mixture material or, in other words, the relative rate of desorption of the extract component. This characteristic relates directly to the amount of desorbent material that must be employed in the process to recover the extract component from the adsorbent; faster rates of exchange reduce the amount of desorbent material needed to remove the extract component and therefore permit a reduction in the operating cost of the process. With faster rates of exchange, less desorbent material has to be pumped through the process and separated from the extract stream for reuse in the process.
In order to test various adsorbents and desorbent material with a particular feed mixture to measure the adsorbent characteristics of adsorptive capacity and selectivity and exchange rate a dynamic testing apparatus is employed. The apparatus consists of an adsorbent chamber of approximately 70 cc volume having inlet and outlet portions at opposite ends of the chamber. The chamber is contained within a temperature control means and, in addition, pressure control equipment is used to operate the chamber at a constant predetermined pressure. Chromatographic analysis equipment can be attached to the outlet line of the chamber and used to anaylze "on-stream" the effluent stream leaving the adsorbent chamber.
A pulse test, performed using this apparatus and the following general procedure, is used to determine selectivities and other data for various adsorbent systems. The adsorbent is filled to equilibrium with a particular desorbent by passing the desorbent material through the adsorbent chamber. At a convenient time, a pulse of feed containing known concentrations of a non-adsorbed paraffinic tracer (n-nonane for instance) and of the particular aromatic isomers all diluted in desorbent is injected for a duration of several minutes. Desorbent flow is resumed, and the tracer and the aromatic isomers are eluted as in a liquid-solid chromatographic operation. The effluent can be analyzed by on-stream chromatographic equipment and traces of the envelopes of corresponding component peaks developed. Alternatively, effluent samples can be collected periodically and later analyzed separately by gas chromatography.
From information derived from the chromatographic traces, adsorbent performance can be rated in terms of capacity index for an extract component, selectivity for one isomer with respect to the other, and the rate of desorption of an extract component by the desorbent. The capacity index may be characterized by the distance between the center of the peak envelope of the selectivity adsorbed isomer and the peak envelope of the tracer component or some other known reference point. It is expressed in terms of the volume in cubic centimeters of desorbent pumped during this time interval. Selectivity, (B), for an extract component with respect to a raffinate component may be characterized by the ratio of the distance between the center of an extract component peak envelope and the tracer peak envelope (or other reference point) to the corresponding distance between the center of a raffinate component peak envelope and the tracer peak envelope. The rate of exchange of an extract component with the desorbent can generally be characterized by the width of the peak envelopes at half intensity. The narrower the peak width the faster the desorption rate. The desorption rate can also be characterized by the distance between the center of the tracer peak envelope and the disappearance of an extract component which has just been desorbed. This distance is again the volume of desorbent pumped during this time interval.
To further evaluate promising adsorbent systems and to translate this type of data into a practical separation process requires actual testing of the best system in a continuous countercurrent liquid-solid contacting device. The general operating principles of such a device have been previously described and are found in Broughton U.S. Pat. No. 2,985,589. A specific laboratory-size apparatus utilizing these principles is described in deRosset et al U.S. Pat. No. 3,706,812. The equipment comprises multiple adsorbent beds with a number of access lines attached to distributors within the beds and terminating at a rotary distributing valve. At a given valve position, feed and desorbent are being introduced through two of the lines and the raffinate and extract streams are being withdrawn through two more. All remaining access lines are inactive and when the position of the distributing valve is advanced by one index all active positions will be advanced by one bed. This simulates a condition in which the adsorbent physically moves in a direction countercurrent to the liquid flow. Additional details on the above-mentioned adsorbent testing apparatus and adsorbent evaluation techniques may be found in the paper "Separation of C.sub.8 Aromatics by Adsorption" by A. J. deRosset, R. W. Neuzil, D. J. Korous, and D. H. Rosback presented at the American Chemical Society, Los Angeles, California, Mar. 28 through Apr. 2, 1971.
Adsorbents to be used in the process of this invention will comprise specific crystalline aluminosilicates or molecular sieves. Particular crystalline aluminosilicates encompassed by the present invention include crystalline aluminosilicate cage structures in which the alumina and silica tetrahedra are intimately connected in an open three dimensional network. The tetrahedra are cross-linked by the sharing of oxygen atoms with spaces between the tetrahedra occupied by water molecules prior to partial or total dehydration of this zeolite. The dehydration of the zeolite results in crystals interlaced with cells having molecular dimensions. Thus, the crystalline aluminosilicates are often referred to as "molecular sieves" when the separation which they effect is dependent essentially upon differences between the sizes of the feed molecules as, for instance, when smaller normal paraffin molecules are separated from larger isoparaffin molecules by using a particular molecular sieve. In the process of this invention, however, the term "molecular sieves" although widely used is not strictly suitable since the separation of specific aromatic isomers is dependent on differences electrochemical attaction of the different isomers and the adsorbent rather than on pure physical size differences in the isomer molecules.
In hydrated form, the crystalline aluminosilicates generally encompass those zeolites represented by the Formula 1 below:
FORMULA 1
m.sub.2/n O:Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 :wSiO.sub.2 :yH.sub.2 O
where "M" is a cation which balances the electrovalence of the tetrahedra and is generally referred to as an exchangeable cationic site, n represents the valence of the cation, w represents the moles of SiO.sub.2, and y represents the moles of water. The cation M may be one or more of a number of possible cations.
The prior art has generally recognized that adsorbents comprising the type X and the type Y zeolites can be used in certain adsorptive separation processes. These zeolites are described and defined in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,882,244 and 3,120,007 respectively.
The type X structured zeolite in the hydrated or partially hydrated form can be represented in terms of mole oxides as shown in Formula 2 below:
FORMULA 1
(0.9.+-.0.2)m.sub.2/n O:Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 :(2.5.+-.0.5)SiO.sub.2 :yH.sub.2 O
where M represents at least one cation having a valence of not more than 3, n represents the valence of M, and y is a value up to about 9 depending upon the identity of M and the degree of hydration of the crystal. As noted from Formula 2 the SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 0.sub.3 mole ratio is 2.5.+-.0.5. The cation M may be one or more of a number of cations such as the hydrogen cation, the alkali metal cation, or the alkaline earth cations, or other selected cations, and is generally referred to as an exchangeable cationic site. As the type X zeolite is initially prepared, the cation M is usually predominately sodium and the zeolite is therefore referred to as a sodium-type X zeolite. Depending upon the purity of the reactants used to make the zeolite, other cations mentioned above may be present, however, as impurities.
The type Y structure zeolite in the hydrated or partially hydrated form can be similarly represented in terms of mole oxides as in formula 3 below.
FORMULA 3
(0.9.+-.0.2)m.sub.2/n O:Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 :wSiO.sub.2 :yH.sub.2 O
where M is at least one cation having a valence not more than 3, n represents the valence of M, w is a value greater than about 3 up to 6, and y is a value up to about 9 depending upon the identity of M, and the degree of hydration of the crystal. The SiO.sub.2 /Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 mole ratio for type Y structure zeolites can thus be from about 3 to about 6. Like the type X structured zeolite, the cation M may be one or more of a variety of cations but, as the type Y zeolite is initially prepared, the cation M is also usually predominately sodium. The type Y zeolite containing predominately sodium cations at the exchangeable cationic sites is therefore referred to as a sodium-type Y zeolite.
Cations occupying exchangeable cationic sites in the zeolite may be replaced with other cations by ion exchange methods generally known to those having ordinary skill in the field of crystalline aluminosilicates. Such methods are generally performed by contacting the zeolite or a base material containing the zeolite with an aqueous solution of the soluble salt of the cation or cations desired to be placed upon the zeolite. After the desired degree of exchange takes place the sieves are removed from the aqueous solution, washed, and dried to a desired water content. By such methods the sodium cations and any non-sodium cations which might be occupying exchangeable sites as impurities in a sodium-type x or sodium-type Y zeolite can be partially or essentially completely replaced with other cations.
The term "base material" as used herein shall refer to a type X or type Y zeolite-containing material which can be used to make the special adsorbent described below. Generally the base material will be in the form of particles such as extrudates, aggregates, tablets, pills, macrospheres, or granules produced by grinding any of the above to a desired size range. The type X or type Y zeolite can be present in the base material in concentrations generally ranging from about 75 wt. % to about 98 wt. % of the base material based on a volatile free composition. The remaining material in the base material generally comprises amorphous silica or alumina or both which is present in intimate mixture with the zeolite material. This amorphous material may be an adjunct of the manufacturing process of the type X or type Y zeolite (for example, intentionally incomplete purification of the zeolite during its manufacture) or it may be added to the relatively pure zeolite but in either case its purpose is to aid in forming or agglomerating particles of the zeolite.
We have found that for this process adsorbents comprising type Y zeolites essentially completely exchanged with a single cation selected from the group consisting of potassium, cesium and rubidium satisfy the selectivity requirements and other requirements previously discussed. Such adsorbents not only exhibit the requisite para-isomer selectivity with respect to the other isomers but also possess such selectivity, as determined by pulse tests, at a value greater than 2. We have found that this desired para-isomer selectivity exists only for adsorbents comprising type Y zeolites (which have a silica to alumina ratio of from about 3 to about 6 ) essentially completely exchanged with a single cation selected from the group consisting of potassium, cesium, and rubidium and that this selectivity decreases with decreasing silica to alumina ratio of the zeolite. For example the para-isomer selectivity with respect to the meta- or ortho-isomer for an adsorbent comprising type X zeolite essentially completely exchanged with one of these cations has decreased to a value less than about 2 and is therefore not desired for use in this process. This result is unexpected since in many other separation processes which employ zeolitic adsorbents the silica to alumina ratio over this same range covered by type X and type Y zeolites has not been found to be critical. Indeed in many instances adsorbents comprising type X and type Y zeolites have been found to be generally equivalent.
The adsorbent for this process will preferably be made by essentially completely ion-exchanging sodium-type Y base materials, in a particle size range from about 20 to about 40 U.S. mesh, with a single cation selected from the group consisting of potassium, cesium or rubidium. Typically the ion exchange will be done with an aqueous solution of the chloride of such a metal. The term "essentially complete" shall mean that the residual sodium content of the adsorbent after the ion exchange shall be less than about 2 wt. % Na.sub.2 O. After ion exchange and water wash to remove excess ion exchange solution the adsorbent will be dried to reduce the water content as measured by loss on ignition (LOI) at 900.degree. C. to less than about 10 wt. % and more preferably within a range of from about 2 to about 7 wt. %. Maintaining adsorbent water content within this range has been found to be necessary to maintain optimum adsorbent and process performance and water may be added to or removed from the process during operations as necessary to maintain this range. By knowing the initial water content of the adsorbent and by analyzing the process input and output streams for water content the water content of the adsorbent during process operation can be calculated. Water may be added to the adsorbent if necessary either on an intermittent or more preferably on a continuous basis by itself or in admixture with feed or desorbent material to maintain the desired concentration of water on the adsorbent. Water may be removed from the adsorbent if necessary by passing a very dry feedstream to the process and allowing the output streams to remove some water from the adsorbent until the desired range is achieved.
EXAMPLE
This example is presented for illustration purposes and more specifically is presented to illustrate the selectivity relationship that makes the process of our invention possible. Reference to specific cations, desorbent materials, feed mixtures and operating conditions is not intended to unduly restrict the scope and spirit of the claims attached hereto.
This example presents selectivities obtained for four adsorbents A, B, C and D by using the pulse test and test apparatus previously described. All adsorbents had a particle size range of approximately 20-40 U.S. mesh and had a water content of about 4 wt. % measured by LOI at 900.degree. C. Adsorbents A, B and C comprise type X zeolite containing sodium, calcium and potassium respectively at the exchangeable cationic sites. Specifically, adsorbent A was Linde 13X Molecular Sieves, adsorbent B was Linde 10X Molecular Sieves, and adsorbent C was prepared by essentially completely ion exchanging Linde 13X Molecular Sieves with an aqueous solution of KCl. Adsorbent D comprises type Y zeolite and was prepared by essentially completely ion exchanging a type Y base material with an aqueous KCl solution.
The testing apparatus was an adsorbent chamber containing approximately 70 cc of each adsorbent and contained within a temperature-controlled means in order to maintain essentially isothermal operations through the column. For each pulse test the column was maintained at a temperature of 150.degree. C. and a pressure of 100 psig to maintain liquid-phase operations. Gas chromatographic analysis equipment was attached to the column effluent stream in order to determine the composition of the effluent material at given time intervals. The feed mixture employed for each test contained about 20 vol. % mixed cymenes (p-, m-, and o-cymenes), 5 vol. % normal nonane which was used as a tracer and 75 vol. % toluene. The mixture cymenes contained about 66.4% meta-cymene, 30.5% para-cymene and 3.1% ortho-cymene. The desorbent material was toluene. The operations taking place for each test were as follows. The desorbent material was run continuously at a nominal liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 1.0 which amounted to about 1.17 cc per minute feed rate of desorbent. At some convenient time interval the desorbent was stopped and the feed mixture was run for a ten-minute interval and 1 LHSV. The desorbent stream was then resumed at 1 LHSV and continued to pass into the adsorbent column until all of the feed aromatics had been eluted from the column as determined by observing the chromatograph generated by the effluent material leaving the adsorption column. The sequence of operations usually takes about an hour. The 10 minute pulse of feed and subsequent desorption may be repeated in sequence as often as is desired. From information derived from the chromatographic traces for each pulse test selectivities of adsorbents for para-cymene with respect to meta- and ortho-cymene were calculated by the methods previously described. These selectivities are shown in Table No. 1 below.
TABLE NO. 1______________________________________Pulse Test ResultsAdsorbent A B C D______________________________________Zeolite Type Na-X Ca-X K-X K-YSelectivities, p-cymene/m-cymene 0.59 1.0 1.16 2.72 p-cymene/o-cymene 0.52 1.16 1.42 2.37______________________________________
The selectivities for adsorbent A are both less than 1.0, indicating that the adsorbent is not selective for para-cymene; indeed, it is selective for meta- and ortho-cymene with respect to para-cymene. Adsorbent B is just slightly selective for para-cymene since the selectivity values are just 1.0 or slightly above. Adsorbent C is somewhat more selective for para-cymene with respect to meta- or ortho-cymene that is adsorbent B but still the selectivity values are less than 2.0 which is desired for this process. Adsorbent D does exhibit selectivity values greater than 2.0 and therefore is suitable for use in this process.

Number	Name	Date
3114782	Fleck et al.	Dec 1963
3126425	Eberly et al.	Mar 1964
3686342	Neuzil	Aug 1972
3732325	Pharis et al.	May 1973
3943184	Rosback	Mar 1976

Aromatic hydrocarbon isomer separation process

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

US Referenced Citations (5)

Continuation in Parts (1)