This application claims the benefit of DE 102012217616.0, filed on Sep. 27, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present embodiments relate to modifying the local intensity of x-ray radiation.
In the case of examinations with the aid of x-ray beams, the organs of a patient generally have very different properties with respect to the absorption of the applied x-ray radiation in the region to be examined. Thus, for example, in the case of chest imaging, the attenuation in the region in front of the lungs is very high due to the organs arranged there, while it is very low in the lungs themselves. In order to obtain a meaningful image and to minimize patient radiation exposure, the applied radiation dose is often set depending on the region in such a way that no more x-ray radiation than necessary is supplied. A larger x-ray radiation dose may be applied in the regions with high attenuation than in regions with less attenuation. Additionally, there are applications in which only part of the region to be examined needs to be imaged with high diagnostic quality. The surrounding parts are important for orientation but not for the actual diagnosis. These surrounding regions can therefore be imaged with a lower radiation dose in order to reduce the overall applied radiation dose.
In diagnostic x-ray instruments, collimators and attenuators are positioned between the x-ray source and the patient in order to minimize the beam exposure of the patient. Often, the settings for collimators and attenuators are selected once, usually manually, by the operator of the x-ray equipment prior to x-ray imaging. The settings are often only possible in discrete steps and cannot be varied during the imaging.
The x-ray beam shape and the x-ray beam profile are typically set in three steps. The measurement beam is initially hardened during pre-filtering as a result of the soft or low-energy components of the x-ray beam being absorbed by a filter, as the low-energy components do not contribute to imaging. The thickness of the filter is often set once in discrete steps prior to the imaging via the insertion of copper disks with different thicknesses. U.S. Pat. No. 4,688,424 discloses a filter arrangement with holes. By moving the arrangement along the beam axis, the absorption of the x-ray beam is set and the intensity of the x-ray beam is varied.
If strongly absorbing tissue or materials situated near weakly absorbing tissue lie in an image field, the beam intensity within the image field is adapted by wedge-shaped filters in a second step. To this end, only a few standard geometries are available and optimum adaptation to the patient is possible to a limited extent. As an alternative, U.S. Pat. No. 5,881,127 discloses a device in which the beam profile is shaped by metallic cylinders. This device requires a multiplicity of mechanical components, making the integration of the device, for example into a C-arm, much more difficult. Moreover, it is very complicated to design the structure in such a way that the mechanical components do not leave artifacts in the space.
In a third step, a collimator restricts the image field to the region relevant for the diagnosis. The restriction is typically only possible in the form of rectangles of various sizes or other standard geometries. EP Patent No. 2395918 describes an adjustable aperture, through which the corners of a rectangle are rounded off to different extents in successive image recordings.
The scope of the present invention is defined solely by the appended claims and is not affected to any degree by the statements within this summary.
The present embodiments may obviate one or more of the drawbacks or limitations in the related art. For example, an arrangement and an improved method are provided for modifying the local intensity of x-ray radiation.
In accordance with one aspect, an arrangement for modifying the local intensity of x-ray radiation is provided. The arrangement includes an x-ray filter with a plurality of absorption chambers that may be filled with a ferrofluid. Ferrofluids are liquids that react to magnetic fields without solidifying. The absorption chambers are arranged or stacked in the x-ray beam direction. The x-ray filter furthermore includes a plurality of storage containers in which the ferrofluid may be stored. Each absorption chamber is respectively connected to one of the storage containers. The absorption of applied x-ray radiation is achieved because individual absorption chambers are filled with the ferrofluid. The absorption of the x-ray radiation may be varied by filling a different number of absorption chambers. As more absorption chambers are filled, the absorption of the x-ray radiation increases. With thinner absorption chambers and increasing overall number of absorption chambers that may be filled by the ferrofluid, the x-ray radiation to be applied to patients may be increasingly fine-tuned by the absorption chambers. The two-dimensional homogeneity of the attenuation is provided by the defined thickness of the ferrofluid material. The local intensity of x-ray radiation may thus be modified easily, precisely and quickly.
In one embodiment, one of the absorption chambers can be respectively arranged in a plane with one of the storage containers. This arrangement may advantageously simplify the flow of the ferrofluid between the absorption chamber and the associated storage container.
In a further embodiment, the arrangement may include a pressure device that generates positive pressure or negative pressure using the ferrofluid. The flow of the ferrofluid may be controlled via the pressure device.
The pressure device may be a pressure container or a pump.
In one embodiment, a first valve may be arranged between the storage container and the pressure device to regulate the inflow and outflow of the ferrofluid between the absorption chamber and the storage container. With the aid of hydrostatic forces generated by the pressure device, the ferrofluid may be displaced from the storage container into the absorption chamber. For example, such displacement is realized by positive pressure in the pressure device when the first valve is opened. The first valve may be configured such that, when the first valve is closed, no ferrofluid flows through the first valve. The ferrofluid may be displaced back into the absorption chamber when the first valve is open with the aid of negative pressure generated by the pressure device.
The absorption chamber and the storage container may have a thickness in the x-ray beam direction of between 50 μm and 150 μm.
The stacked absorption chambers may be separated from one another by a separator layer. The separator layer may be configured such that the separator layer has very low x-ray absorption in order to minimize or reduce the loss of x-ray photons. Materials with a low atomic number and that may be formed in thin layers may be used for the separator layer.
The separator layer may include glass or polymethyl methacrylate.
In one embodiment, the absorption chamber and/or the storage container may be lined on the inside by a hydrophobic layer. Such lining reduces adhesion of the ferrofluid on the interior walls of the absorption chamber and/or of the storage container. The coating may be formed via silanization of the surface. An overview of available methods is provided in DE19543133C2.
In one embodiment, a second valve may be arranged between the absorption chamber and the storage container connected thereto. The second valve may regulate the inflow and outflow of the ferrofluid between the absorption chamber and the storage container. The second valve separates the absorption chamber from the storage container. In the event that positive pressure is generated by the pressure device, the ferrofluid from the storage container flows into the absorption chamber. The second valve renders it possible that even (e.g., equal) portions of the ferrofluid may be displaced from the storage container into the absorption chamber. Ferrofluid disposed in the absorption chamber is extracted from the absorption chamber into the storage container in the event that negative pressure is generated by the pressure device. The second valve renders it possible that even (e.g., equal) portions of the ferrofluid may be displaced from the absorption chamber into the storage container.
In one embodiment, the arrangement may include at least one electromagnet that generates a magnetic force. The electromagnet is disposed at the absorption chamber.
The local distribution of the ferrofluid in the absorption chamber may be controlled by at least one magnetic force acting on the ferrofluid. A plurality of magnets may be disposed differently at the absorption chamber to generate differently directed magnetic forces. As a result, the amount of ferrofluid disposed in the absorption chamber may be individually or distinctly established.
An aperture may be formed by the distribution of the ferrofluid.
In accordance with another aspect, a method for modifying the local intensity of x-ray radiation uses an x-ray filter. In the method, a ferrofluid is stored in a plurality of storage containers. Subsequently, a plurality of stacked absorption chambers of the x-ray filter are filled with the ferrofluid. Each of the absorption chambers is connected to a respective one of the storage containers.
The local distribution of the ferrofluid in the absorption chamber may be controlled by at least one magnetic force acting on the ferrofluid.
In one embodiment, the method may be carried out using an arrangement as described herein.
Further details and advantages of the invention will become clear from the following description, based on schematic drawings, of several exemplary embodiments.
Ferrofluids may be used to generate a variable aperture. The shape of the ferrofluids is determined with the aid of magnetic fields. The homogeneity of the ferrofluid film constitutes a previously unsolved problem, e.g., when under the influence of gravity in the case of different orientations of a collimator in space, as occurs, for example, in a C-arm x-ray unit.
The arrangement further includes a plurality of storage containers 5 in which the ferrofluid 6 may be stored, i.e. retained. Each of the absorption chambers 4 is connected to a respective one of the storage containers 5 and disposed in a plane. However, in alternative embodiments, a common reservoir 5 is employed for all absorption chambers 4. A pressure device 7 includes a positive pressure reservoir 8 with a positive pressure valve 9 and a negative pressure reservoir 10 with a negative pressure valve 11. The pressure device 7 may be used to generate hydrostatic forces in the form of positive or negative pressure using the ferrofluid 6. As a result of the pressures, the absorption chambers 4 may be filled or emptied individually. First valves 12 are arranged between the storage containers 5 and the pressure device 7. With the first valves 12, the inflow and outflow of the ferrofluid 6 between an absorption chamber 4 and the storage container 5 connected thereto may be regulated. The ferrofluid 6 of a storage container 5 may be extracted from the storage container 5 and deposited into the corresponding or associated absorption chamber 4 by hydrostatic forces, which may be generated by the pressure device 7. For example, the extraction may be realized by positive pressure in the storage container 5, which is generated by opening the first valve 12 associated with the storage container 5 when positive pressure valve 9 is likewise opened and negative pressure valve 11 is closed. The ferrofluid 6 disposed in an absorption chamber 4 may be extracted from the absorption chamber 4 and deposited into the corresponding or associated storage container 5. For example, the extraction may be realized by negative pressure in the storage container 5, which is generated by opening the first valve 12 corresponding or associated with the storage container 5 when negative pressure valve 11 is likewise opened and positive pressure valve 9 is closed.
It is to be understood that the elements and features recited in the appended claims may be combined in different ways to produce new claims that likewise fall within the scope of the present invention. Thus, whereas the dependent claims appended below depend from only a single independent or dependent claim, it is to be understood that these dependent claims can, alternatively, be made to depend in the alternative from any preceding or following claim, whether independent or dependent, and that such new combinations are to be understood as forming a part of the present specification.
While the present invention has been described above by reference to various embodiments, it should be understood that many changes and modifications may be made to the described embodiments. It is therefore intended that the foregoing description be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting, and that it be understood that all equivalents and/or combinations of embodiments are intended to be included in this description.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 217 616 | Sep 2012 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4688424 | Handtmann et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5559853 | Linders et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5751786 | Welters et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768340 | Geittner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5881127 | Molloi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5966426 | Marra et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6061426 | Linders et al. | May 2000 | A |
6118855 | Welters et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6188749 | Schiller et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198806 | Prins | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6252939 | Young et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269147 | Powell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275568 | Prins et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6426999 | Prins | Jul 2002 | B2 |
7308073 | Tkaczyk et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
8129701 | Al-Sadah et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20040105525 | Short et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20080260098 | Al-Sadah et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090010395 | Ein-Gal | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110293069 | Roberts | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130202092 | Haider | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130343516 | Hayden et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4422780 | Jan 1996 | DE |
19543133 | May 1997 | DE |
2599886 | Dec 1987 | FR |
2599886 | Dec 1987 | FR |
2010092516 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
German Office Action cited in German Patent Application No. 10 2012 217 616.0, dated Apr. 23, 2013, with English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140086392 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |