The present invention relates to an arrangement in a pressing tool, more specifically in a pressing tool in which the forming process is performed using a sheet metal holder supported by a gas-filled spring, which holds the sheet metal throughout the forming process.
In sheet-metal forming operations, use is made of tools fitted in a press. The upper part of the tool follows the movement of the press slide throughout, while other parts, such as the said sheet metal holder, for example, are at rest during a part of the press cycle. The springs which support the sheet metal holder are loaded or tensioned in the pressing process and retain the sheet metal fabrication securely during forming, to be relieved and expanded during the upward movement of the press slide and upper part of the press after sheet metal forming has been carried out. There is a risk at this point of the sheet metal holder lifting off from the gas-filled springs and of the finished sheet metal fabrication coming loose uncontrollably from the sheet metal holder if the negative g-force (the retardation) becomes too great during the braking adjacent to the limit positions of the gas-filled springs. If the springs are braked too rapidly after return, the holder will not come to a stop when the springs reach their limit positions, but risks travelling on to be braked by the g-force, whereupon it falls back down on to the springs. This “jump” by the holder (blank holder bounce) causes wear and generates noise. There is also a risk of the holder itself jumping out of its guides.
An example of the known technology in this area is given in EP-A-1074759.
The main object of the present invention is therefore to provide an arrangement in a pressing tool that eliminates the risk of the holder lifting off from the gas-filled springs.
Another object of the invention is to provide an arrangement which incorporates a damping/braking of the piston/piston rod movement of the gas-filled spring and hence also of the movement of the holder adjacent to the extended limit position, by using existing components of the press.
According to the invention the aforementioned objects are achieved by an arrangement having the characteristics specified in the claims.
By incorporating a limit position damper into the gas-filled springs forming part of the main springs in the press, that is to say springs with a capacity of almost 10 tonnes per spring in large presses, it is easily possible to control the retardation both of the springs and of the holder, so as to achieve gentle braking both of the holder part and then also of the finished pressed part once pressing has been carried out.
The invention will now be described in connection with an example of an embodiment shown in drawings attached, in which:
a and 1b show diagrams of a part of a known pressing tool with sheet metal holder and sheet metal fabrication before and immediately after the forming process,
a-c show diagrammatic cross-sections through a modified gas-filled spring arrangement according to the invention permitting a braking/limit-position damping and at various degrees of extension,
a shows diagrams of a part of a known pressing tool A with sheet metal holder B and sheet metal fabrication C immediately prior to the forming process, while
a shows a first cross-sectional view through a modified gas-filled spring arrangement D according to the invention with brake cylinder part E and brake piston part F permitting a limit-position braking/damping on attainment of the extended position—here shown in its fully nested position, however—while
The invention is not limited to the example of an embodiment described above, but lends itself to modifications without departing from the scope of the claims specified below.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0101915 | May 2001 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE02/00916 | 5/15/2002 | WO | 00 | 11/26/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/097295 | 12/5/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
475582 | Little | May 1892 | A |
645683 | Graham | Mar 1900 | A |
3726458 | Rabl | Apr 1973 | A |
4570912 | Dodson et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4700611 | Kaneko | Oct 1987 | A |
4792128 | Holley | Dec 1988 | A |
4796871 | Bauer et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5172892 | Wallis | Dec 1992 | A |
5193433 | Reimer | Mar 1993 | A |
5823513 | Stenquist | Oct 1998 | A |
6170809 | Cotter | Jan 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
34 41 005 | May 1985 | DE |
36 10 751 | Mar 1986 | DE |
35 46 236 | Jul 1987 | DE |
38 04 081 | Aug 1989 | DE |
195 34 683 | Mar 1997 | DE |
196 37 291 | May 1997 | DE |
197 32 761 | Mar 1998 | DE |
0 209 909 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0 617 202 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0 648 941 | Apr 1995 | EP |
9 959 263 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 074 759 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 113 185 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1 113 185 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1 057 550 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 226 534 | Mar 1971 | GB |
2 008 716 | Jun 1979 | GB |
2 042 640 | Sep 1980 | GB |
9003523 | May 1990 | WO |
0005517 | Feb 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040178548 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |