This application is a 371 U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/SE 2011/050951, filed on Jul. 14, 2011, which claims priority to Swedish Patent Application No. 1050810-9, filed on Jul. 16, 2010. The contents of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present inventive concept relates to an arrangement for a lock.
Traditional locks are usually made up of a cylinder rotatably arranged in a cylinder housing and comprising a plurality of lock elements of different design. For rotation of the cylinder to be allowed, each lock element must be actuated with a key in the intended manner. In order to enable a large number of opening criteria or lock codes, the cylinder contains many lock elements with many different configurations, which lock elements thus need to be actuated in many different ways to allow rotation of the cylinder. This traditional lock type normally has a fixed configuration which is defined in the factory when the lock is produced. Since locks, for obvious reasons, are variously designed, it is thus difficult to mass produce such locks in a rational and cost-effective manner.
An object of the present inventive concept is thus to provide an arrangement for a lock which enables rational and cost-effective production of locks.
According to a first aspect of the inventive concept, an arrangement for a lock is provided, comprising a first lock part and a second lock part which is rotatably arranged in the first lock part and comprises a plurality of lock elements for cooperation with the first lock part and a key, which lock elements comprise a first and a second group of lock elements which are oriented with a primary end facing in a first and a second direction respectively relative to the second lock part, each of which lock elements in the first and the second group is arranged: to assume a first position relative to the second lock part in the absence of actuation of the key, to be movable by means of the key from the first position into a third position via a second position which is an intermediate position relative to the first and the third position, and to prevent rotation of the second lock part in the first position, each lock element in the first group being arranged to in the second position prevent rotation of the second lock part and in the third position allow rotation of the second lock part, and each lock element in the second group being arranged to in the second position allow rotation of the second lock part and in the third position prevent rotation of the second lock part.
The arrangement according to the invention enables a secure lock of simple structure. Since the lock elements in both the first and the second group prevent rotation when they are in their first positions, a strong construction is obtained, which construction makes rotation of the second lock part difficult without access to the correct key.
The fact that each lock element in the first group prevents rotation of the second lock part when the respective lock element is in its second position and allows rotation in its third position, combined with the fact that each lock element in the second group allows rotation of the second lock part when the respective lock element is in its second position and prevents rotation in its third position, means that a large number of lock codes can be obtained with just two groups or types of lock element. This, in turn, enables rational and cost-effective production of the arrangement. Furthermore, the arrangement enables the establishment of a binary opening condition or binary lock code, wherein the number of possible codes for an arrangement comprising N number of lock elements amounts to 2N.
The second lock part may be rotatably arranged in the first lock part from an initial orientation relative to the first lock part wherein, when the second lock part is in the initial orientation, each lock element in the first and the second group is arranged: to assume the first position, to be movable, and to prevent rotation of the second lock part from the initial orientation.
According to one embodiment, each lock element in the first group and the second group is reconfigurable into a lock element in the second group and the first group respectively by such reorientation of the lock element that the primary end thereof is turned in the second and first direction respectively.
According to this embodiment, an arrangement for a lock is provided, which arrangement can be conveniently and easily provided with a code or an opening condition by arranging each lock element with its primary end facing in the first direction or the second direction. This enables effective production, since only lock elements of one configuration need to be produced. This embodiment additionally allows an existing lock to be recoded. This can be useful, for example, if the key has been lost, since the lock code can then easily be changed so that the lost key becomes unusable.
According to one embodiment, the first lock part comprises a first and a second receiving means, the lock elements being arranged to cooperate with the receiving means. The receiving means may extend in a direction parallel with the longitudinal direction of the second lock part. The lock elements may be arranged to cooperate with said receiving means when the second lock part is in the initial orientation.
According to one embodiment, the arrangement is arranged such that the primary end of each lock element in the first group engages with the first receiving means when the said lock element is in the first position and when the said lock element is in the second position, wherein rotation of the second lock part is prevented. The fact that the primary end of a lock element in the first group engages with the first receiving means when the lock element is in the first position and when the lock element is in the second position means that rotation of the second lock part relative to the first lock part is effectively prevented.
The arrangement may further be arranged such that the primary end of each lock element in the first group, upon displacement of the lock element from the second position into the third position, is disengaged from the first receiving means, wherein rotation of the second lock part is allowed. An element in the first group will thus effectively prevent rotation of the second lock part when the element is in its first and second position, but allow rotation when it is in its third position.
According to one embodiment, each lock element in the second group presents a secondary end, the arrangement being arranged such that the secondary end engages with the first receiving means when the lock element is in the first position, wherein rotation of the second lock part is prevented. The fact that the secondary end of a lock element in the second group engages with the first receiving means when the lock element is in the first position means that rotation of the second lock part can be effectively prevented.
The arrangement may further be arranged such that the secondary end of each lock element in the second group, upon displacement of the lock element from the first position into the second position, is disengaged from the first receiving means, wherein rotation of the second lock part is allowed. Such a lock element, when in its second position, will thus not prevent rotation of the second lock part.
The arrangement may further be arranged such that the primary end of the lock element in the second group, upon displacement of the lock element from the second position into the third position, is brought into engagement with the second receiving means, wherein rotation of the second lock part is prevented. In order to be able to rotate the second lock part, it is thus not sufficient for the lock element to be displaced from the first to the second position so that the secondary end disengages from the first receiving means, but nor may it be displaced such that its primary end is brought into engagement with the second receiving means. This design makes forcing of the arrangement difficult.
According to one embodiment, each lock element in the first group presents a secondary end and is arranged to be movable from the third position into a fourth position when the second lock part is in the initial orientation, the arrangement being arranged such that the secondary end of each lock element in the first group, upon displacement of the lock element from the third position into the fourth position, is brought into engagement with the second receiving means, whereby rotation of the second lock part is prevented. In order to be able to rotate the second lock part, it is thus not sufficient for the lock element to be displaced from the first into the third position so that the primary end disengages from the first receiving means, but nor may it be displaced such that its secondary end is brought into engagement with the second receiving means. This design makes forcing of the arrangement more difficult.
According to one embodiment, each lock element in the first group presents a secondary end having the same extent as the secondary end of a lock element in the second group. Furthermore, the primary end of each lock element in the first group may have the same extent as the primary end of a lock element in the second group.
This allows the arrangement to be constructed with lock elements of uniform configuration, in which each lock element can be given a function corresponding to that of a lock element in the first group or a function corresponding to that of a lock element in the second group, quite simply by turning the primary end of the lock element in the first or the second direction.
If the lock elements are removably arranged in the second lock part, resetting of a lock code or opening criterion by the removal and turning of lock elements is also made possible.
According to one embodiment, the first receiving means comprises a first groove in the first lock part, arranged to receive the primary ends of the lock elements in the first group and the secondary ends of the lock elements in the second group. Effective cooperation between the lock elements and the first lock part can thus be realized with a simple configuration of the first lock part. The first groove may be common to all lock elements. In addition, the second receiving means may comprise a second groove arranged to receive the primary ends of the lock elements in the second group. The second groove may further be arranged to receive the secondary ends of the lock elements in the first group.
According to one embodiment, the arrangement is arranged such that the primary end of each lock element in the first group extends into the first groove when the lock element is in the first position and when the lock element is in the second position.
According to one embodiment, the arrangement is arranged such that the primary end of each lock element in the first group, upon displacement of the lock element from the second position into the third position, vacates the first groove.
According to one embodiment, each lock element in the second group presents a secondary end, the arrangement being arranged such that the secondary end extends into the first groove when the lock element is in the first position.
According to one embodiment, the arrangement is arranged such that the secondary end of each lock element in the second group, upon displacement of the lock element from the first position into the second position, vacates the first groove.
According to one embodiment, the arrangement is arranged such that the primary end of the lock element of the second group, upon displacement of the lock element from the second position into the third position, enters into the second groove.
According to one embodiment, the first groove presents a portion having a cross-sectional shape of decreasing width in a direction away from the bottom of the groove. Such a shape can make knocking of the lock more difficult. By knocking is meant a process by which a tool is inserted into the second lock part, after which one or more blows are applied to the tool in order thereby to force the elements to assume a non-blocking position. Knocking is prevented particularly effectively if the primary end of each lock element in the first group and the secondary end of each lock element in the second group present a portion of increasing width in a direction towards the primary end and the secondary end respectively.
According to one embodiment, the first groove comprises a wall portion which at least partially delimits the first groove in the longitudinal direction thereof. This makes accessing, and thus manipulation of the ends of the elements present in the first groove more difficult. The arrangement may further comprise a plurality of such wall portions arranged one after another in the first groove in order to make manipulation yet more difficult.
According to one embodiment, the arrangement comprises means for returning the lock elements to their first positions. This can be realized, for example, by arranging magnets in connection with the first receiving means and by making the lock elements of a magnetic material. If the first receiving means comprises a first groove, magnets may be arranged in the first groove. If the first groove comprises a wall portion, the wall portion may be made of a magnetic material. Regardless of how the return is achieved, the return means prevent the lock elements from sticking in their second or third positions, for example after a key has been removed from the arrangement, and may instead be brought effectively into engagement with the first receiving means when the position of the second lock part relative to the first receiving means so allows. It also makes it possible for the lock elements to assume their first positions without the aid of gravity, which can be useful, for example, when the arrangement is used in an application in which the first and second receiving means are at the same level.
According to one embodiment, the arrangement further comprises at least one element of a third element group arranged in the second lock part for cooperation with the first lock part and the key, which at least one element is arranged to assume a first position in the event of non-actuation of the key and to be movable by means of the key from the first position into a second position and a third position, the at least one element being arranged to prevent rotation of the second lock part in the first position and to allow rotation of the second lock part in the second and third position. Furthermore, the at least one element may present a primary end, and the arrangement may be arranged such that the primary end, when the at least one element is in the first position, engages with the first receiving means, wherein rotation of the second lock part is prevented, and further arranged such that the primary end disengages from the first receiving means when the at least one element is transported into the second or third position, wherein rotation of the second lock part is allowed. This type of element enables the arrangement to be coded such that a number of different keys may be used for opening. This type of element can thus be said to have a neutral function. These neutral elements also have the advantage that they prevent rotation of the second lock part when they are in their first position. The introduction of neutral elements does not therefore weaken the arrangement, but rather, like the lock elements in the first and second group, can help to prevent forced rotation of the second lock part.
The present inventive concept will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, which show non-limiting examples of embodiments of aspects of the inventive concept.
The first lock part 2 comprises four receiving means in the form of grooves 7, 8, 9, 10 (of which only grooves 7 and 10 are visible in
The second lock part 3 comprises a plurality of element channels 15, in which the elements 4, 5, 6 may be arranged. The element channels 15 extend at right angles to the rotational axis of the second lock part 3. The elements 4, 5, 6 are transportable in their respective element channels 15.
The front side of the second lock part 3 is provided with a keyhole 16 to allow insertion of a key into the second lock part 3.
Each element 4, 5, 6 comprises an opening 18. Once the elements 4, 5, 6 are arranged in the element channels 15, the openings 18 thus form together with the keyhole 16 a channel for the reception of a key. The upper edge of the opening 18 of each element 4, 5, 6 constitutes an engagement surface for the key.
The arrangement 1 is intended for mounting in a lock casing or lock housing, for example, in a door. In order to cooperate with other components in the lock casing (such as a lock bolt), the back of the second lock part 3 may for this purpose be provided with suitable means (not shown).
As can be seen from
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Since all elements present ends which extend into the first groove 7 when the elements are in their first positions, sight of and access to ends of elements situated behind these in the first groove 7 is prevented, which, in turn, makes manipulation of the arrangement difficult.
As can be seen from
According to an alternative embodiment, the secondary ends of the first group of lock elements do not need to have the same configuration as the secondary ends of the second group of lock elements. Correspondingly, nor do the primary ends of the first group of lock elements need to have the same extent as the primary ends of the second group of lock elements. Such a configuration of the lock elements may be used if the above reconfigurability is not desirable.
In
According to the embodiment illustrated in
As is shown in
As is shown in
As is shown in
As can be seen from
In
In
In
Rotation of the second lock part 3 is allowed if all lock elements in the first group 4 are brought into their third position and all lock elements in the second group 5 are brought into their second position, and all neutral elements 6 are brought into their second or third position. By varying the number of elements 4, 5, 6 and the relative order of the elements 4, 5, 6, different opening criteria, or lock codes, can be obtained. The arrangement 1 comprises sixteen elements 4, 5, 6 and element channels 15. An arrangement having a larger number of elements 4, 5, 6 and element channels 15 enables more lock codes. Correspondingly, an arrangement having a smaller number of elements 4, 5, 6 enables fewer lock codes.
As can be seen from
In
The key 30 further comprises a coded portion 32. If the key is correctly coded with respect to the arrangement 1, the coded portion 32 has a protrusion 34 at each position along the key 30 which corresponds to positions for a lock element in the first group 4. This protrusion 34 has an extent corresponding to the distance D2 between the second and third position for the lock element 4 in the first group. Conversely, the coded portion 32 does not have any protrusion at the positions along the key 30 which correspond to positions for lock elements in the second group 5. At the positions along the key 30 which correspond to positions for neutral elements 6, the coded portion 32 may either present a protrusion or not present any protrusion, without this affecting the facility to rotate the second lock part 3. This is a consequence of the fact that a neutral element 6 allows rotation both when in its second position and when in its third position.
The profile of the coded portion 32 may thus be easily described with a binary code, for example by having “1” correspond to the presence of a protrusion and “0” correspond to the lack of a protrusion. In the same way, the corresponding configuration of lock elements 4, 5 (i.e. the lock code) can also easily be described with a binary code.
A key intended for the arrangement 1 thus comprises a plurality of successive key positions, the key being arranged to displace the elements 4, 5, 6 from their respective first positions into their respective second positions as it is inserted into the arrangement, and wherein the key, at each key position, is arranged to cooperate with an element 4, 5, 6 so that this element assumes its second position or third position.
To prevent a lock element 5 from sticking in its third position as the key 30 is inserted, the coded portion 32, at the positions corresponding to positions for lock elements in the second group 5, may present a protrusion 35, as is shown in
As is illustrated in
The key 30 further comprises a grip 41. The grip 41 is arranged in the groove of the rod 40. The grip 41 and the code segments 36, . . . , 39 can be locked in place along the rod by means of a nut 42. The key 30 may thus be constructed by means of just a limited number of code segments, which may be configured in a standardized manner. This, in turn, enables rational production of code segments, for example by casting or injection moulding of metal or composite material, since just one set of moulds needs to be built. It is also possible, however, to configure the key 30 such that it cannot be constructed. For example, the key 30 can be formed in a single piece by a casting or milling process.
Possible groove configurations will be discussed below in connection with the first groove 7, but the other grooves 8, 9, 10 may also be configured correspondingly.
In order to make forcing of the arrangement 1 yet more difficult, the first groove 7 may be delimited in its longitudinal direction so as thereby to make access to the ends of the elements 4, 5, 6 difficult. For this purpose, the outer part 51 accommodates a wall arrangement 52 shown from the rear in
In
In
By instead orienting the wall arrangement 52 according to
In
In
According to one embodiment, the first groove 7 comprises magnets. If the first groove comprises a wall arrangement 52, the wall portions 53, 54 thereof, for example, may be permanent magnets. Furthermore, the elements 4, 5, 6 may at least partially be made of a magnetic material, in which case an action of returning the elements 4, 5, 6 to their respective first positions may be realized. This element-returning action is particularly advantageous if the arrangement 1 is to be used in a different orientation from that shown in
As is shown in
As is shown in
Where such reconfigurability is not desirable, it will be appreciated that a lock element having a function corresponding to that of the previously described lock element 5 may alternatively be obtained with a lock element comprising a primary end for cooperation with the groove 61, which primary end has the same configuration as the secondary end 70.
The groove 61 and/or the groove 62 may further be delimited in their respective longitudinal directions as with the embodiment shown in
In the above-described embodiments the first lock part 2 is configured in one piece. According to an alternative embodiment, the first lock part may be divided into two or more pieces. When a second lock part (corresponding to the lock part 3 in
For example, a first piece of the first lock part may be arranged in a door and a second piece of the first lock part may be furnished in a behind-situated door frame. By inserting the second lock part in the first and second piece and subsequently rotating the second lock part such that the protrusions of the second lock part are not lined up with the grooves in the first and second piece and the elements of the second lock part cooperate with the first receiving means of the first and second piece, it is thus possible to lock the door easily. The door and the door frame may be held together between the flange and the protrusions of the second lock part. The door may further be unlocked by rotation of the second lock part such that withdrawal of the second lock part from the first and second pieces is allowed, wherein the second lock part may be removed and the door may be opened.
Above, the inventive concept has mainly been described with reference to a number of embodiments. As will be appreciated by the person skilled in the art, embodiments other than the above-described are possible, however, without deviating from the inventive concept as defined by the appended patent claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1050810 | Jul 2010 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2011/050951 | 7/14/2011 | WO | 00 | 1/11/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/008914 | 1/19/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1107376 | Thiman | Aug 1914 | A |
1406573 | Mantanfel | Feb 1922 | A |
1440459 | Greff | Jan 1923 | A |
1644365 | Bennett | Oct 1927 | A |
RE20143 | Gray | Oct 1936 | E |
2647391 | Uher | Aug 1953 | A |
3170317 | Parlier | Feb 1965 | A |
3208248 | Tornoe | Sep 1965 | A |
4292823 | Reinhard et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4440008 | Uher | Apr 1984 | A |
5134871 | Makino et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
6263713 | Fantl | Jul 2001 | B1 |
20050061042 | Lin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060101880 | Ward-Dolkas et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20311099 | Oct 2003 | DE |
2041061 | Sep 1980 | GB |
533347 | Aug 2010 | SE |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/SE2011/050951, mailed Oct. 27, 2011; ISA/SE. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130104610 A1 | May 2013 | US |