The present invention generally relates to security devices. More specifically the invention concerns the safeguarding of desk computers against theft by tying the computer casing by a steel cable to a fixed object, say around the nearest desk leg.
Using a steel cable as computer anti-theft means, in particular with regard to portable computers, is not new: see, e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,327,752 and 6,244,082. The innovative efforts were mostly directed as how to connect the cable to the computer casing without introducing major changes. As reflected by the above-mentioned patents, the solution found was to make use of a slot-shaped opening formed OEM at one of the casing walls. For less expensive, sheet metal desk computers, the problem has not yet been satisfactorily solved.
It is therefore the prime object of the invention to harness the sheet metal desk computer casing to a cable via means already existing in the conventional construction of such computers.
It is a further object of the invention to convert the conventional door lock of certain brand computers (IBM and others) into a universal attachment for a specially designed cable shoe.
It is a still further object of the invention to provide a “universal” attachment and fitting cable-shoe, forming together useful and convenient means for arresting any portable object, by the cable to a stationary object.
Thus provided according to the invention is an arrangement for arresting a portable object such as a desk computer against a stationary object by looping around the stationary object one end of a cable, the other end thereof being provided with a key-operated locking device, the arrangement comprises: a block-like cable-shoe body; an oblong circular cavity formed in the body with an undercut portion extending along about 180° of one side thereof; a ribbed attachment member, adapted to be inserted into the cavity and shifted into engagement with the undercut portion, and then locked thereinside by the key-operated device; and the portable object being provided with said ribbed attachment member affixed to a side wall thereof.
The cable-shoe and ribbed attachment member may be used for a variety of applications, such as in combination with hook locks, padlock ears, tongs locks, or as “stand-alone” devices.
These and other constructional features and advantages of the invention will be more clearly understood in light of the ensuing description of a preferred embodiment thereof, given by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:—
Certain models of desk computer casings made of sheet metal with a hinged rear- or side-walls, are equipped with a most simple cylinder lock (often called “mail-box” locks). The following described embodiment of the invention is based on a substitute of this conventional, almost primitive and easily tampered with, lock by a locking device of an improved design.
Hence, in
The lock 10 is mounted to wall 18 of the computer in the conventional manner, namely by using a springy, bifurcated clip 20 adapted to fit into a pair of slits 22a and 22b. The major, unique part of the lock 10 consists of a “universal” attachment portion generally denoted 24. This is the core of the present invention and common to all applications and embodiments; it may even be applied as a “stand-alone” article (see
The attachment portion 24 comprises a circular (in this example) recess 26, defined between first and second shoulders or ribs 28 and 30 of equal diameters. The roll of this double-rib structure will be readily understood in view of the description below.
Turning to
It will be readily understood that, with regard to this embodiment, two goals are achieved: the primitive conventional cylinder lock is replaced by a more sturdy and safe one, at no significant extra cost; and the cable-shoe is freely rotatable by 360° which enhances the convenience of its use due to the inflexible nature of the cable. This, however, will not be the case if the circular ribs 28 and 30—and consequently also the outline of the cavity 46—be made non-circular (e.g. elliptical or squarish).
The locking device 110 of
The lock 110 is generally a block-shaped body with a push-in locking device 114 implanted so that the operator pin 114a thereof is adapted to project into a slot 152 configured to receive the ears 150a, 150b (
To the back of the lock body 114 there is fastened, e.g. by bolt 154, (or made integral therewith) the universal attachment member 124 of the design already familiar from the previous embodiment.
The cable-shoe 144 is shown in phantom lines in
In the embodiment illustrated in
In summery, the arrangement proposed according to the invention offers a simple and low-cost solution to the ever-increasing stealing problem of computers or other valuable portable objects.
Those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains will readily appreciate that numerous changes, variations and modifications can be effected without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined in and by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
154194 | Jan 2003 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2004/000059 | 1/22/2004 | WO | 00 | 7/28/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/067887 | 8/12/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3859826 | Singer et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
4305266 | Lockwood | Dec 1981 | A |
4328687 | Ritchie | May 1982 | A |
4893777 | Gassaway | Jan 1990 | A |
4973023 | O'Neill | Nov 1990 | A |
5127244 | Myers | Jul 1992 | A |
5327752 | Myers et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5345794 | Jenks | Sep 1994 | A |
5400629 | Myers | Mar 1995 | A |
5709110 | Greenfield et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5875657 | Kelley | Mar 1999 | A |
5913907 | Lee | Jun 1999 | A |
6205824 | Miao | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227017 | Igelmund | May 2001 | B1 |
6244082 | Avganim | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6257029 | Liao | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6317936 | McDaid et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6360405 | McDaid et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6401502 | Yang | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6449992 | Yu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463770 | Lee | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6536244 | Chang | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6619081 | Yu | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622532 | Hsu | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6705133 | Avganim | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708535 | Sanders | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6758069 | Derman | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763688 | Syu | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6880373 | Ling | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886376 | Kuo | May 2005 | B2 |
6918272 | Sanders | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6968716 | Ling | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6971254 | Bellow et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7028513 | Avganim | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7073358 | Lee | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7100403 | Murray et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7143614 | Murray et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7150168 | Kuo | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7249474 | Avganim | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20040065126 | Yang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040129037 | Avganim | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168486 | Ling | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050022566 | Bellow et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050178172 | Mc Gettrick | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050204786 | Meyer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223756 | Ling et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060086160 | Marszalek et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070119219 | DeMartinis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070169523 | Lu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0839978 | Oct 1997 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060225470 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |