The general requirement to realize a drive that exhibits an extremely low position deviation given load fluctuations and thus behaves rigidly can be of importance in different usage cases. An important example is provided in electrographic printing or copying devices in which a plurality of drive elements must run with high uniformity because fluctuations in the drive lead to a position error in the print product, in particular in color printing. An example results from WO 98/39691 A1, which is included in the disclosure. There a printing or copying device is described with which color printing is possible. Here the individual color separations are collected on a transfer belt in the color collection mode. When all color separations for the print image are collected, the recording medium (for example a paper) is pivoted onto the transfer belt and the print image is transfer printed. It is then simultaneously begun to collect the next color separations on the transfer belt. Since the recording medium and the transfer belt do not exhibit the same surface speed, after the pivoting of the transfer belt between recording medium and transfer belt a force develops that leads to a change of the drive torque of the transfer belt. The force (and thus the torque change) is determined and limited by the contact force of the transfer belt on the recording medium and the friction coefficient between them.
Due to the change of the load torque while the recording medium is pivoted onto the transfer belt, the load angle of the drive motor for the transfer belt also changes, whereby this chases after its desired position (desired position: position at which the transfer belt would be if the recording medium had not been pivoted onto the transfer belt). An offset of the color separations transferred from the intermediate image carrier (for example a photoconductor belt) onto the transfer belt thereby results while the transfer belt is pivoted onto the recording medium to which color separations are transfer-printed from the intermediate image carrier onto the transfer belt is the transfer belt is pivoted away from the recording medium. The offset can amount to approximately 100 μm. The drive torque can thereby change by 1 Nm to 5 Nm.
Upon pivoting of the transfer belt away from the recording medium the force transferred between the recording medium and the transfer belt is abruptly removed. The drive torque for the transfer belt thereby also changes suddenly, whereby on the one hand the transfer belt again runs with the original load angle and on the other hand the transfer belt is shifted into oscillations. Both effects cause a displacement of the color separations. The amplitude of the oscillation can amount to approximately +/−100 μm.
It is an object to specify an arrangement in which the load angle of the drive moment is kept constant in spite of alteration of the driven load.
In a method or system for driving a load element, a drive motor is provided on a drive shaft of the load element that establishes a drive rotation speed of the load element. A rotation torque sensor on the drive shaft emits a load torque signal proportional to a rotation torque. A rotation torque influencing device generates a supplementary torque when the load torque signal deviates from a desired load angle value present when a change has not occurred to a load created by the load element and acting on the drive motor, the supplementary torque being added to a drive torque generated by the drive motor such that a load angle of the drive motor remains substantially constant and uninfluenced by a change of the load.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
The measurement device can be a rotation torque sensor that measures as measurement values the load torques incurred on the drive shaft by the load element. The load angle deviation can be determined from the measured load torque without load change (desired value) and the load torque given load change (torque deviation).
Since in operation the desired value does not change, a one-time establishment of the desired load torque value is sufficient.
Given presence of a load change a supplementary torque can be generated with the rotation torque influencing device supplementary torque being added to the torque generated by the drive motor. The load angle of the drive motor is then not influenced by the load change.
A supplementary motor that generates the supplementary torque via which the torque deviation caused by the change of the load is compensated can be used as a rotation torque influencing device. A brushless direct current motor or a servomotor can be provided as a supplementary motor. The supplementary motor generates a constant basic torque and a variable torque that results due to the load change at the load element. The drive motor must only still raise the drive rotation speed and a small, constant residual torque.
The size of the supplementary torque to be applied by the supplementary motor is established via the rotation torque sensor. The supplementary motor is regulated or controlled depending on the installation location of the rotation torque sensor.
Advantages of the arrangement with supplementary motor are to be seen in the following:
The arrangement can be realized such that
The arrangement can also be designed such that
The arrangement can furthermore be designed such that
The rotation torque influencing device can be a brake that exerts a braking torque on the drive shaft dependent on the torque deviation, via which braking torque the torque deviation is compensated. The brake can, for example, be an eddy current brake. Here as well the drive motor determines the rotation speed of the load element and applies a constant rotation torque. The rotation speed fluctuations are thereby kept extremely small since the drive motor perceives no load change.
Further advantages are:
The arrangement of the preferred embodiment can also be realized such that
Finally, the brake can also be arranged on a further shaft that deflects the load element.
The load element can, for example, be a belt that is driven by the drive motor and which is deflected by a further shaft.
If the drive motor is a step motor, the phase position of the driving magnetic field for the motor shaft of the step motor can be influenced with regard to the position of the motor shaft such that the measured position of the motor shaft remains constant relative to the desired position of the motor shaft (position without load change) even when the load for the motor changes.
In a first realization of this principle, the characteristic of the torque-phase angle characteristic line can be used to control the phase position of the magnetic field of the step motor.
In a second realization, the actual deviation from the desired position can be used as an input value for a regulator with which the phase position of the magnetic field can be regulated with regard to the motor shaft.
In both realizations the step motor is not operated with a fixed activation frequency for the motor currents; rather the activation frequency is adapted dependent on the load.
In the first realization the measurement device can be a rotation torque sensor that: measures the load torque; supplies the measurement values to the rotation torque influencing device that determines the change of the load torque caused by the load change; determines from the torque-phase angle characteristic line the phase angle change associated with the change of the load torque; and initiates the control of the activation frequency of the step motor dependent on this change of the load torque. The rotation torque sensor can thereby be arranged between the step motor and the load element on the drive shaft for the load element.
In the second realization the measurement device can be a rotation sensor that generates rotation sensor pulses as measurement values dependent on the rotation movement of the drive shaft and supplies rotation sensor pulses to the rotation torque influencing device that determines the time between the rotation sensor pulses and compares this time with the time without load change and, with the comparison result, regulates the activation frequency of the step motor. The rotation sensor can thus be arranged on the drive shaft and the step motor can thus lie between the rotation sensor and the load element.
The rotation torque influencing device can be a microprocessor that is programmed such that it operates as a PID regulator. From the measurement values this microprocessor generates clock signals for the motor controller which derives the activation pulses for the motor currents to be fed to the step motor from these clock signals.
The arrangement of the preferred embodiment can advantageously be used in an electrographic printing or copying device in which charge images of images to be printed are generated on an intermediate image carrier, which images to be printed are transferred onto a transfer belt after development and are then transfer-printed onto a recording medium. Here the load element can be the transfer belt that is driven by an arrangement according to the preferred embodiment. The supplementary motor or the brake can then be arranged on the drive shaft for the transfer belt or on a shaft that lies at the transfer printing point of the recording medium and the transfer belt.
The is preferred embodiments are further explained using the drawing Figures. A transfer belt of an electrographic printing or copying device according to WO 98/39691 A1 is drawn upon as an example of a load element without the preferred embodiments being limited to the application case.
According to
It is a goal of the design to keep constant the rotation torque that the drive motor 1 must apply to drive the transfer belt 7. If this is the case then the load angle of the drive motor does not change. The majority of the drive torque and drive torque fluctuations are therefore generated by the supplementary motor 4. The drive motor 1 thus only still determines the rotation speed of the transfer belt 7 and contributes only a small portion to the drive torque, which portion is however constant. In order to achieve this the rotation torque sensor 2 measures the rotation torque that must be applied by the drive motor 1. The regulator 3 readjusts the operating voltage of the supplementary motor 4 such that the measured rotation torque is kept to a previously-set rotation torque (desired torque).
Since it does not wait until a rotation torque change is integrated into a measurable position change of the transfer belt 7, the arrangement operates with a shorter reaction time than a regulation that uses a position signal as a measurement quantity. Furthermore, since the drive motor 1 is always operated with the same load, the load angle also remains constant and, since no load changes act on the drive motor 1, no oscillations of the transfer belt 7 are induced as well.
In comparison to
In the third exemplary embodiment according to
The same advantages as in
It is again the goal of the design according to
A fifth exemplary embodiment results from
Via the arrangement according to
In sixth and seventh exemplary embodiments, given a step motor for compensation of the load change (and the load angle change thereby incurred) the phase position of the magnetic field driving the motor shaft of the step motor is influenced with regard to the position of the motor shaft.
If the load changes given a step motor, the phase position of the magnetic field of the motor thus changes with regard to the position of the motor shaft. Speed fluctuations are thereby caused. It is a goal of the preferred embodiments to react to changes of the load torque such that they do not lead to a change of the phase position of the motor shaft of the step motor relative to its desired position (phase position without load change).
In a sixth exemplary embodiment, given a step motor fed with current at a standstill, the torque that is necessary for deflection of the motor shaft from the zero position is to be approximately described by a sinusoidal function (see
In the rest position the torque is zero. The maximum torque (holding torque of the motor) occurs when the motor shaft is, for instance, deflected by a full step from the rest position; after two full steps the torque is again at zero, as in the rest position. The torque curve first repeats after 4 full steps. Given a stable operation of the step motor, the deviation of the position of the motor shaft from the desired position can thus at maximum amount to +/−1 full steps. For safety reasons, the actual usable range is clearly smaller. Dependent on the load, a fixed phase angle φ arises that can be determined for each motor. The phase angle φ is thus the angle between the position of the motor shaft and the position of the magnetic field of the step motor.
The same considerations apply for a rotating step motor, only with the difference that the level of the maximum torque that can be delivered decreases with increasing rotation speed of the step motor since the friction in the step motor is greater on the one hand; on the other hand, given rising rotation speed the current that produces the driving magnetic field can no longer be injected into the motor coils due to the inductivity.
In spite of this, for every motor the characteristic line “Torque M over deflection φ” can be experimentally determined for each motor current and each rotation speed.
If the load torque is now determined with the rotation torque sensor 14 (see
A step motor so activated maintains the phase angle that exists at the desired position of the motor shaft, even at its real position, even when the load torque changes, since the phase angle between desired position of the motor shaft and position of the magnetic field is controlled dependent on the load.
In a seventh exemplary embodiment, a rotation sensor 16 is used for determination of the position of the motor shaft (see
In the realization according to the seventh exemplary embodiment, the pulses of the rotation sensor 16 are not counted; rather the time between the rotation sensor pulses is measured and added up. One therefore obtains not the position of the motor shaft at specific time intervals but rather the time (in fixed angle intervals) at which the motor shaft has reached the desired position.
The method is only usable for a rotating motor due to the time measurement between two angle positions; a position regulation given a standstill is not possible. The regulation occurs according to the following. How long the respective time interval would have to be between two rotation sensor pulses in an ideal manner is known by the motor controller. If the actual measured time interval is subtracted from this desired interval, one knows by which Δt the respective time interval has deviated from the desired interval. If one adds up the deviations up to the current point in time, one receives the time by which the motor shaft was too early or too late at the location at which the last measurement was implemented. Since the temporal deviation of the motor shaft position from the desired position is now known, the motor activation of the step motor can be influenced via a regulation such that the deviation goes towards zero.
The temporal resolution of the measurement now depends only on the precision of the rotation sensor 16 and the precision of the time measurement, however not on the resolution of the rotation sensor 16. Since rotation sensors 16 can be very precisely produced with simple a device and time measurements with microprocessors can realize resolutions of far less than 1 μs, a very precise determination of the deviation of the real motor shaft position from its desired position is possible.
Via this method the phase angle that was present upon activation of the regulation is also regulated.
The regulation given constant rotation speed in connection with
The pattern of the current curve repeats every 4 complete steps. If the position regulation is now switched on, a microprocessor additionally measures the time interval between two rotation sensor pulses (ΔTrotation sensor) that in this case should ideally be equal to the time interval of a half step (ΔT) (see
In the first row
The difference from desired duration for a half-step and the measurement value are now established and the result is added up. The summation begins upon activation of the regulation with the value 0. The summand specifies by which Δt the motor shaft is too early or too late at the desired position (see
The step duration of the next steps of the step motor 11 can be shortened or extended with this value such that the temporal deviation of the real position from the desired position is optimally small.
As an alternative to the variation of the step duration, the access to the motor current table (
An arrangement for the seventh exemplary embodiment is to be learned from
Among other things, a normal PID regulator or even a regulator with fuzzy logic can be used for the regulation. It is additionally possible to filter out specific frequencies from the regulator input signal (measurement values) in order to avoid resonances.
Given use of a PID regulator, the following properties result:
The described method exhibits the following properties:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 039 044 | Aug 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/008593 | 8/8/2005 | WO | 00 | 10/31/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/018175 | 2/23/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4006982 | Squassoni et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4373147 | Carlson, Jr. | Feb 1983 | A |
4686433 | Shimizu | Aug 1987 | A |
4874974 | Wu | Oct 1989 | A |
5200782 | Castelli et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5608770 | Noguchi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5701062 | Barrett | Dec 1997 | A |
5962999 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6166499 | Kanamori et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6246856 | Kopp et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
20020114642 | Rimai et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 28 366 | Jan 2001 | DE |
0 693 816 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 748 038 | Dec 1996 | EP |
61-62386 | Mar 1986 | JP |
11095503 | Apr 1999 | JP |
WO 9839691 | Sep 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080107435 A1 | May 2008 | US |