The present invention relates to an arrangement and a process for locally preventing the development of fires in closed duct systems or piping systems such as, in particular, cable ducts and ducts intended for transporting gaseous media, for locally containing the origin of fires, for extinguishing fires and also preventing fires from spreading and the use of the equipment and process of the invention.
So-called cable fires can develop and spread further in piping systems intended for gaseous media such as air, in particular, and in closed duct systems such as cable ducts, in which usually electrical lines are also routed. These cable fires can spread over entire mains supply networks. In order to prevent the same, fire dampers or self-foaming fireproof bulkheads are usually installed at the borders of fire compartments. These fire dampers and fireproof bulkheads are intended to prevent the fire from flashing over from one fire compartment to another. An actual fire-extinguishing process in ducts and pipes is neither known from the prior art nor provided therein. The fire dampers and fireproof bulkheads cited above indeed restrict the consequences resulting from the occurrence of fires, but do not substantially reduce the development thereof.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to clearly reduce the risk of fires developing in piping systems intended for gaseous media, in particular, or in duct systems intended for routing lines, to locally contain fires in piping systems and to extinguish fires rapidly. The object underlying the invention is of relevance and interest if the piping system is permanently encased, for example, in concrete in the ground, and at the same time is used as a duct system for the electrical distribution system or if the duct system is part of a ceiling-element system. In doing so, electrical installations such as lighting systems or drives for exhaust air flaps are also integrated into exhaust air ducts by way of example.
The underlying object is achieved as suggested by the invention with the aid of an arrangement and a process pursuant to the invention as set forth herein. It has been suggested to install fire-control posts at several locations and at appropriate distances from each other in the chase or in the duct system, which fire-control posts are interconnected by way of an electrical cable, via which information is exchanged both among the different fire-control posts and with a superordinate monitoring system, and the individual fire-control posts are also supplied with active energy for triggering the desired function. All the fire-control posts preferably have an identical structure and, for example, four functions each: detecting, signaling, inerting, and sealing-off.
The functions of detecting and signaling are autonomous functions and each fire-control post performs the same independently of all the other posts. The functions of inerting and sealing-off are usually performed in most cases only in coordination with neighboring posts, with the superordinate control level or in an absolutely isolated case of emergency, if appropriate.
For performing the “detecting” function, each fire-control post is preferably equipped with at least one sensor that is suitable for detecting a developing or existing fire or appropriate fire conditions. For example, a temperature of more than 80°, the concentration of CO2 in the surrounding atmosphere of more than 5,000 ppm, and the concentration of low-temperature carbonization gases are suitable indicators that by themselves or as a sensor system enable the detection of a dangerous situation. The energy for operating the sensors is obtained from an electrical cable that either interconnects the fire-control posts or that forms part of an electrical piping system which is laid in the chase or cable duct anyway. During normal operation, that is to say, in the case of measured values lying below a threshold value or the tolerance limit, the sensor usually either does not transmit any so-called “Ready” signals or transmits only sporadic “Ready” signals. If the sensor value/s at a fire-control post exceed a defined threshold value also referred to as alarm value 1, a rapid signaling mode is started and the current sensor values are signaled at least to a superordinate location or preferably also to all the fire-control posts in the duct system or in the signaling network. Usually, no further functions of the fire-control post are triggered if only one threshold value or alarm value 1 at only one post has been exceeded.
If the sensor values at a fire-control post exceed the alarm value or defined threshold value and if the system signals that other fire-control posts have also measured the exceedance of an alarm value 1 or a threshold value, then the “inerting” function can be triggered at one or more fire-control posts. In doing so, a quantity of inert gas is released in or at the fire-control post by opening a container in which the inert gas is stored under pressure during normal operation. The inert gas flows in all directions of the duct system away from the fire-control post and reduces the content of oxygen in the duct behind the inert gas front to, for example, <12%, that is to say, below the flammability limit. In this zone, fire either cannot develop or it is extinguished. Simultaneously with the triggering of the “inerting” function, mechanical shutters in the duct system can be closed and an alarm can additionally be triggered with the specification of the activated fire-control posts, by virtue of which the electric supply into the electrical cables within the duct system is interrupted with the exception of the power supply to the monitoring system.
Should the sensor values continue to rise at at least one, preferably at least two neighboring fire-control posts in the system after the “inerting” phase has been triggered, the “sealing-off” function is triggered. In doing so, an additional container is opened in which a suitable substance is stored under the pressure of a second inert gas or propellant, which substance rapidly foams up after the container has been opened and completely seals the entire cross-section of the duct at the location of the fire-control post(s) and renders the same fireproof. The excess inert gas and propellant can flow further into the duct and perform a second inerting function. Together with the triggering of the “sealing-off” function, a fire alarm is set off and the activated fire-control posts are displayed. By means of the superordinate monitoring system, a damage profile and a threat level can be calculated from the signals received and additional precautionary measures are activated at other systems of building maintenance management. These precautionary measures can include:
The system can be operated, for example, using the so-called digitalSTROM™ technology of AIZO AG, a corporation of the Federal Republic of Germany, the normal power grid or also a separate wire possibly in addition to a normal supply with a voltage of, for example, 230 Volts AC being laid for the electrical supply of the fire-control posts. The fire-control posts are connected electrically by means of this separate wire. This results in higher redundancy. Should there be a power loss on this wire, the “switch-off” function is triggered after a short period of time.
Incidentally, the use of the digitalSTROM™ technology means that it is possible to exchange information over the entire wire and transport active power to the fire-control post.
The invention is explained in further detail by way of example and with reference to the accompanying Figures, in which:
Furthermore, two containers 13 and 15 are disposed on the monitoring post as shown schematically in
The monitoring station shown schematically in
If the sensor 11 at a monitoring station illustrated in
By releasing the inert gas, the oxygen content in the surroundings of the sensor 11 within the duct 1 is reduced to a value in a manner that disables additional fires from developing or enables an existing fire to be quenched. However, if the threshold values have been exceeded at several stations and an inerting function also cannot extinguish a fire sufficiently or cannot extinguish a fire at all, which in turn can be detected by the sensor 11, for example, the release of the propellant and the foaming agent contained in container 15 is triggered, which is illustrated schematically in
If a sealing-off by means of foam is necessary, a corresponding alarm is additionally triggered and passed to the central monitoring station so that it is now possible to determine the location at which the duct system has been sealed-off with the aid of foam.
As described above, but not illustrated in the Figures, it is also possible to provide mechanical shutters in the duct system in order to divide the duct into different fire compartments for preventing a fire from spreading.
The monitoring station illustrated in
Also the duct 1 need not have an oval cross-section, as illustrated; a rectangular, round, or square cross-section is also possible.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1196/08 | Jun 2008 | EP | regional |
1196/08 | Jul 2008 | CH | national |