The present invention relates to closures and, in particular, it concerns a closure in which a hinged panel is secured against forces.
Hinged panels are widely used as closures for doors, windows and other openings. The term “panel” is used herein generically for any and all such closures. The panel generally closes against a frame. The portion of the frame lying on the side supporting the hinge is referred to as the “hinge jamb”. The portion of the frame lying on the side opposite to the hinge jamb is referred to as the “strike jamb”.
There is a need for an arrangement for securing a panel closure in a manner effective to withstand forces applied on the panel.
The present invention is a closure.
According to the teachings of an embodiment of the present invention there is provided, a closure comprising: (a) a frame defining an opening, the frame comprising a hinge jamb and a strike jamb; (b) a panel mounted via a hinge relative to the hinge jamb, the panel assuming a closed position in which the panel abuts a primary abutment surface of the hinge jamb and a primary abutment surface of the strike jamb, providing an at least partial closure for the opening, the panel being hingedly movable towards a swing-side of the opening to an open position in which the opening is substantially unobscured, the primary abutment surfaces of the hinge jamb and the strike jamb being deployed to oppose forces tending to displace the panel away from the swing-side of the opening, the panel including a hinge-side extension deployed relative to the hinge so as to close against a secondary abutment surface of the hinge jamb located in a recess of the hinge jamb as the panel is brought into the closed state; and (c) an abutment block displaceable when the panel assumes the closed position between an engaged state in which the abutment block is disposed between an abutment surface of the panel and a secondary abutment surface of the strike jamb and a disengaged state in which the abutment block is displaced so as to allow hinged motion of the panel towards the open position, wherein the secondary abutment surfaces of the hinge jamb and the strike jamb are deployed to oppose forces tending to displace the panel towards the swing-side of the opening, and wherein the panel abutment surface, the abutment block and the secondary abutment surface of the strike jamb are configured such that, when the abutment block assumes the engaged state, forces acting on the abutment block opposing opening of the panel are primarily compressive forces.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the abutment block and the secondary abutment surface of the strike jamb are configured such that, when the abutment block assumes the engaged state, forces acting on the abutment block opposing opening of the panel do not generate a bending moment on the abutment block.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the abutment block is biased from the disengaged state towards the engaged state, and is deployed such that, when the panel is swung from the open position towards the closed position, the abutment block is temporarily displaced towards the disengaged state and then returns to the engaged state to lock the panel in the closed position.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the abutment block is retractably mounted relative to the strike jamb.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the abutment block is retractably mounted by pivotally mounting to the strike jamb so as to be pivotable around a pivot axis extending substantially parallel to an edge of the opening defined by the strike jamb.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the frame further comprises a lintel interconnecting between the hinge jamb and the strike jamb, the lintel being provided with a supplementary abutment block retractably mounted relative to the lintel so as to assume an engaged state for engaging an abutment surface along a top edge of the panel and a disengaged state for allowing swinging of the panel from the closed position towards the open position.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the frame further comprises a threshold interconnecting between the hinge jamb and the strike jamb, the threshold being provided with a supplementary abutment block retractably mounted relative to the threshold so as to assume an engaged state for engaging an abutment surface along a lower edge of the panel and a disengaged state for allowing swinging of the panel from the closed position towards the open position.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the abutment block is retractably mounted relative to the panel.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the abutment block is retractably mounted by pivotally mounting to the panel so as to be pivotable around a pivot axis extending substantially parallel to an edge of the panel.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the frame further comprises a lintel interconnecting between the hinge jamb and the strike jamb, and wherein the panel is provided with a supplementary abutment block retractably mounted along a top edge of the panel as to assume an engaged state for engaging an abutment surface of the lintel and a disengaged state for allowing swinging of the panel from the closed position towards the open position.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the frame further comprises a threshold interconnecting between the hinge jamb and the strike jamb, and wherein the panel is provided with a supplementary abutment block retractably mounted along a lower edge of the panel as to assume an engaged state for engaging an abutment surface of the threshold and a disengaged state for allowing swinging of the panel from the closed position towards the open position.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the panel and the hinge and strike jambs are formed with complementary interlocking features configured to oppose inward motion of edges of the panel when the panel is in the closed position.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the panel is implemented as a blast-resistant door.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the panel is implemented as a glass panel without a panel-mounted lock mechanism.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the panel abutment surface, the abutment block and the secondary abutment surface of the strike jamb are configured such that displacement of the abutment block from the disengaged state beyond the engaged state effects tightening of the panel against the primary abutment surface of the strike jamb.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a tightening mechanism mechanically linked to the abutment block and configured to apply force to the abutment block so as to displace the abutment block beyond the engaged state so as to effect the tightening.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the abutment block is implemented as an articulated abutment block comprising a first block portion and a second block portion interconnected at an internal hinge, and wherein, when the abutment block assumes the engaged state, displacement of the internal hinge is effective to tighten the panel against the primary abutment surface of the strike jamb.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the hinge and the hinge jamb are configured to allow hinged motion of the panel from the closed position through an angle of at least 160 degrees.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the deployment and surface properties of the abutment block, the abutment surface of the panel and the secondary abutment surface of the strike jamb are such that, when the panel is in the closed position and the abutment block is in the engaged position, forces tending to displace the panel towards the swing-side of the opening generate frictional locking of the abutment block between the panel and the strike jamb.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the abutment block extends along at least 20 percent of a height of the panel.
There is also provided according to an embodiment of the present invention, a closure comprising: (a) a frame defining an opening, the frame comprising a hinge jamb and a strike jamb; (b) a panel mounted via a hinge relative to the hinge jamb, the panel assuming a closed position in which the panel abuts a primary abutment surface of the hinge jamb and a primary abutment surface of the strike jamb, providing an at least partial closure for the opening, the panel being hingedly movable towards a swing-side of the opening to an open position in which the opening is substantially unobscured, the primary abutment surfaces of the hinge jamb and the strike jamb being deployed to oppose forces tending to displace the panel away from the swing-side of the opening, the panel including a hinge-side extension deployed relative to the hinge so as to close against a secondary abutment surface of the hinge jamb located in a recess of the hinge jamb as the panel is brought into the closed state; and (c) an abutment block displaceable when the panel assumes the closed position between an engaged state in which the abutment block is disposed between an abutment surface of the panel and a secondary abutment surface of the strike jamb and a disengaged state in which the abutment block is displaced so as to allow hinged motion of the panel towards the open position, wherein the secondary abutment surfaces of the hinge jamb and the strike jamb are deployed to oppose forces tending to displace the panel towards the swing-side of the opening, and wherein the abutment block is pivotally mounted to one of the strike jamb and the panel so as to be pivotable around a pivot axis extending substantially parallel to an edge of the opening defined by the strike jamb.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the abutment block is biased from the disengaged state towards the engaged state, and is deployed such that, when the panel is swung from the open position towards the closed position, the abutment block is temporarily displaced towards the disengaged state and then returns to the engaged state to lock the panel in the closed position.
There is also provided according to an embodiment of the present invention, a closure comprising: (a) a frame defining an opening, the frame comprising a hinge jamb, a lintel and a threshold; (b) a panel mounted via a hinge relative to the hinge jamb, the panel assuming a closed position in which the panel extends from the hinge jamb across at least part of the opening to provide an at least partial closure for the opening, the panel being hingedly movable towards a swing-side of the opening to an open position; and (c) an abutment block displaceable when the panel assumes the closed position between an engaged state, in which the abutment block is disposed between an abutment surface of the panel and an abutment surface of one of the lintel and the threshold, and a disengaged state in which the abutment block is displaced so as to allow hinged motion of the panel towards the open position, wherein the panel abutment surface, the abutment block and the abutment surface of the one of the lintel and the threshold are configured such that, when the abutment block assumes the engaged state, forces acting on the abutment block opposing opening of the panel are primarily compressive forces.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, the panel is one of a pair of panels forming a double door.
According to a further feature of an embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a second abutment block displaceable when the panel assumes the closed position between an engaged state, in which the second abutment block is disposed between an abutment surface of the panel and an abutment surface of another of the lintel and the threshold, and a disengaged state in which the abutment block is displaced so as to allow hinged motion of the panel towards the open position.
The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present invention is a closure in which a hinged panel is secured against bidirectional forces.
The principles and operation of closure according to the present invention may be better understood with reference to the drawings and the accompanying description.
By way of introduction, the following description and the accompanying drawings refer to a number of exemplary and non-limiting embodiments of the present invention which share common underlying principles, and which also share many structural features. For simplicity of presentation, a general description of multiple embodiments will now be presented with reference primarily to
According to certain preferred embodiments of the invention, panel 10 includes a hinge-side extension 10a deployed relative to hinge 16 so as to close against a secondary abutment surface 12b of hinge jamb 12, located in a recess 12c of the hinge jamb, as the panel is brought into the closed state.
When panel 10 is in its closed position, it is secured against opening by an abutment block 20 in an engaged state (
It is a particularly preferred feature of certain preferred embodiments of the present invention that panel abutment surface 10b, abutment block 20 and the secondary abutment surface 14b of strike jamb 14 are configured such that, when abutment block 20 assumes the engaged state, forces acting on abutment block 20 opposing opening of panel 10 are primarily compressive forces, and most preferably, do not generate a bending moment on the abutment block.
At this stage, various advantages of the present invention will already be apparent. Specifically, in the closed state of the panel with the abutment block engaged, panel 10 is provided with bilateral support against forces in both an inward and an outward direction. The reliance on compressive forces facilitates implementations which withstand greater forces than would be accommodated by conventional bolts and other elements which rely on resistance to bending. At the same time, the structure is particularly simple, and can be implemented as a normally-locked mechanism which is resistant to applied force whenever closed, without requiring an additional locking operation. These and other advantages of various embodiments of the present invention will be better understood by reference to the following drawings and the accompanying description.
Before addressing the features of certain embodiments of the present invention in more detail, it will be useful to define certain terminology as used herein in the description and claims. Firstly, the term “closure” is used herein to refer generically to any arrangement for selectively closing an opening in a structure, typically a building or vehicle. The term “panel” is used to refer to the element deployed across at least part of the opening in the closed state. The panels and corresponding closures may be doors, windows or any other type of opening which is selectively closed (or partially closed) by a hinged panel.
The term “jamb” is used to refer to any structural support at the sides of opening providing abutment surfaces against which the panel closes, and includes the possibility of multiple separate components providing separate abutment surfaces. The “hinge jamb” is the jamb on the side of the opening where the panel is mounted on a hinge, although the hinge is not necessarily mounted directly to the jamb. The term “strike jamb” is used generically for the jamb on the side of the opening furthest from the hinge, and should not be taken to imply the presence of any “strike plate” structure. The two jambs are typically part of a frame surrounding the opening on at least three sides, and optionally on four sides. The term “lintel” is used to refer to a top edge of the frame and the word “threshold” is used to refer to the lower edge of the frame. Although more often used in the context of doors, this terminology is used herein in the description and claims to refer to the corresponding components of frames of any and all openings to which the present invention may be applied, including windows and other openings. The jambs (and entire frame) may be a distinct dedicated structure installed within a larger original opening in a wall, or may be formed as an integral part of a wall, floor or ceiling, with or without additional elements to define the abutment surfaces.
In various embodiments, the abutment block is described as “displaceable” or “retractable”. These terms refer to the ability of the abutment block to move between the engaged and the disengaged positions, but does not imply any particular type of motion. In many of the embodiments described herein, the displacement or retraction is achieved by a pivotal motion of the abutment block.
For the purpose of defining directions of forces and other geometrical definitions, reference is made to a plane of the opening, defined by the plane in which the panel lies in its normal fully closed position. Where the panel has significant thickness or is significantly non-planar in its shape, this plane may be arbitrarily defined as a central plane lying within the overall thickness of the panel as defined by any suitable best-fit algorithm. This plane of the opening may be considered to subdivide the Universe into two parts, with the part lying on the side of the plane towards which the panel moves during normal hinged opening being referred to as the “swing side” of the door, and the opposing part being referred to as “away from the swing side” or “beyond the closed position”, or simply the “non-swing side”. It should be noted that, due to the bidirectional resistance of the structures of the present invention to applied forces, there is typically no requirement as to whether the “swing side” is facing inwards or outwards relative to the protected structure.
The forces on the abutment block in the engaged state are described as being “primarily compressive”. This phrase is used to distinguish between the type of forces acting on a conventional bolt and those acting on the abutment block of the present invention. Specifically, referring briefly to
In certain particularly preferred implementations, the abutment geometry is such that forces opposing opening of the panel do not generate a bending moment on the abutment block. In this context, it should be noted that the lack of bending moment relates to the primary load-bearing forces which dominate under high load conditions, and does not take into consideration forces resulting from spring bias element, a pivot hinge on which the abutment block may be mounted, or any other components which interact with the abutment block but which are not designed to be primary load-bearing components under conditions of loading approaching the design limitations of the closure.
The word “locked” is used herein in the description and claims to refer to a state in which mechanical engagement prevents opening of the panel, and provides effective support to oppose forces acting to try to open the panel. In contrast to a conventional latch mechanism which typically requires a secondary bolt to provide more significant support, preferred structures according to the present invention are inherently braced against applied impacts or blasts whenever locked, and are most preferably inherently locked whenever they are closed.
As a corollary to the above, the word “lock” in this document does not imply any particular mechanism for limiting unauthorized access through the opening, such as a cylinder lock or an electronic lock. Such devices may indeed be used together with the present invention, for example as a part of an actuation mechanism as will be described below with reference to
Certain configurations of the locking arrangements of the present invention are described as providing “frictional locking”. Specifically, in certain preferred cases, the deployment and surface properties of abutment block 20, abutment surface 10b of the panel and secondary abutment surface 14b of the strike jamb are such that, when the panel is in its closed position and abutment block 20 is engaged, forces tending to displace panel 10 towards swing-side 18 generate frictional locking of abutment block 20 between panel 10 and strike jamb 14. The conditions for frictional locking, derived simply from the coefficient of friction between the surfaces, are well known. This frictional locking helps to ensure that forces acting on the abutment block remain primarily compressive, and is particularly valuable for embodiments such as will be illustrated below with reference to
In certain cases, an embodiment of the invention may be used as a blast resistant closure, typically a door or window, for a shelter. Requirements for such structures are typically defined by various military or governmental bodies. In Israel, current requirements preclude the use of inwardly-opening hinged doors, since currently-available options typically have greatly reduced blast resistance towards the swing side of the opening. In the context of the present invention, as mentioned above, inward-opening deployment can readily be implemented to withstand the required level of blast impulse, and may actually offer significant safety benefits, reducing the complications of rescue operations where debris may prevent outward opening of a door. Thus, particularly preferred implementations of a blast door according to the present invention provide effective bidirectional protection, both against an initial blast and against a “rebound” effect, and can be mounted in either inward-opening or outward-opening configurations.
Certain implementations of the present invention may also be highly advantageous for use as a hurricane protection door. All such applications as blast resistant doors and hurricane protection doors may be referred to generically as “doors for protection from air-pressure forces”, whether positive or negative pressure.
Turning now to the features of certain preferred embodiments of the present invention in more detail,
In applications in which a gas-proof seal is required without particularly high strength, the combination of interlocking with the frame together with sealing strip 40 allows the use of a much thinner panel than is conventionally used. Most preferably for such applications, configurations for anchoring against inward deformation of the panel (that would otherwise pull it away from the frame) are provided around at least three edges, and most preferably all four edges, of the opening. The seal is reliably maintained even under conditions of significant flexing of the center of the panel, with the panel functioning essentially like a diaphragm seal secured around its periphery.
Even where blast resistance is required, the anchoring of the panel around its periphery allows much greater bowing of the panel to be tolerated without compromising the protective properties of the closure, thus allowing relatively thin sheet metal implementations produced by stamping production processes.
As mentioned above, abutment block 20 is preferably biased from its disengaged state back towards its engaged state, and is deployed such that, when panel 10 is swung from the open position towards the closed position, abutment block 20 is temporarily displaced towards the disengaged state and then returns to the engaged state to lock the panel in the closed position. This sequence is illustrated in
In the particularly preferred implementation illustrated here, retraction and reengagement of abutment block 20 is achieved by rotating it around a pivot axis 46 extending substantially parallel to an edge of the opening defined by the strike jamb. For this purpose, abutment block 20 is pivotally mounted to the strike jamb, typically on an elongated pivot rod.
Parenthetically, in this and other embodiments of the present invention, it should be noted that the invention may be implemented with a number of abutment blocks implemented as separate elements spaced along the height of the jamb. More preferably, a single abutment block extends along at least 20 percent of the height of the panel, more preferably along a majority of the height of the panel, and in most preferred cases, along more than 90 percent of the height of the panel, thereby allowing simple unitary actuation of the abutment block while providing support to the panel along most of its height.
According to a further preferred option illustrated here, secondary abutment surface 12b is provided with a number of vertically spaced projecting pins 48 and the hinge-side extension 10a of the panel is formed with complementary apertures 50 which engage pins 48 as the panel reaches its fully closed position. This engagement serves the same purpose as projecting lip 42 on the strike jamb side of the panel, locking the edge of the panel against being drawn inwards under forces which would otherwise cause bowing of the panel and tend to extract the panel from the jambs.
The illustrations referred to thus far all show the engagement of panel 10 with the vertical jambs at the sides of the opening. The frame around the opening typically also includes a lintel interconnecting between the hinge jamb and the strike jamb. In certain cases, a conventional lintel with a single abutment surface may be used. In such cases, the bilateral support provided by the engagement of the panel with both the hinge jamb and the strike jamb is generally sufficient to provide effective locking and resistance to forces acting on the panel.
In a further optional implementation illustrated in
Turning now to
The structural and operational principles of this arrangement remain the same as those described above with the jamb-mounted block, differing only in relation to the retraction motion of abutment block 20 and to which component is it mounted.
In the example of
Also visible in
The strike jamb side of panel 10 is shown here formed with projecting lip 42 for engaging complementary step 44 of strike jamb 14, in a manner similar to that described above.
Turning now to
Primarily, the embodiment of
One particularly preferred but non-limiting implementation of this tightening mechanism is shown in
In the event of a blast occurring when abutment block 20 is not fully tightened, the geometry of the angled surface against which roller bearings 52 tighten would in principle tend to push the abutment block to an open position. Nevertheless, most preferably, roller bearings 52 are configured to resiliently retract or collapse rapidly under high load, and the solid abutment surface has a stepped form or is otherwise angled so as to effectively oppose blast forces even when in the non-tightened state of
A further distinction between this embodiment and that of
Turning now to
The mechanism shown here provides a manually operable handle 60 which rotates an eccentric linkage, shown here as a disk 62 with a peripheral connection point 64. A spring-loaded piston assembly 66 is mounted between connection point 64 and abutment block 20. Parenthetically, although most preferred embodiments of the invention employ an abutment block 20 extending along a significant proportion of the height of the corresponding dimension of panel 10, the schematic illustration shown here illustrates a localized abutment block 20 for clarity of presentation.
In the position of
When handle 60 is raised to the state of
When displaced from the position of
Turning now to
While panel 10 is open and the actuator is released, the articulated abutment block preferably returns under bias of spring 36 to a position similar to that of
Although no actuation mechanism is shown here, it will be appreciated that the actuation mechanism of
Referring now to
Finally, it should be noted that the present invention may be implemented to advantage with a wide range of different panel materials and styles. By way of one non-limiting example, in certain cases, panel 10 may be implemented as a frameless glass panel, such as a glass door. Of particular interest for such an implementation are the various embodiments in which no lock mechanism or latch structure is required to be mounted on the panel, enabling use of a glass panel with a minimum of attached accessories, facilitating manufacture and installation, and maintaining a particularly aesthetically pleasing and elegant effect while achieving effective locking of the panel against forces in two directions.
It will be appreciated that the above descriptions are intended only to serve as examples, and that many other embodiments are possible within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2572717 | Gersten | Oct 1951 | A |
3019493 | Walenga | Feb 1962 | A |
3159093 | Rosenfeld | Dec 1964 | A |
3841516 | Marz | Oct 1974 | A |
4126965 | Hoffmann | Nov 1978 | A |
4133142 | Dzus, Jr. | Jan 1979 | A |
4203255 | Naslund et al. | May 1980 | A |
4367610 | Goode | Jan 1983 | A |
6185871 | Wang | Feb 2001 | B1 |
7707776 | Weissofner et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20070290456 | Speyer | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
929592 | Jun 1955 | DE |
2628036 | Jan 1977 | DE |
3447796 | Jul 1986 | DE |
8900012 | Mar 1989 | DE |
29517077 | Feb 1997 | DE |
10117173 | Oct 2002 | DE |
10322798 | Dec 2004 | DE |
1574657 | Sep 2005 | EP |
2233701 | Jan 1991 | GB |
2233701 | Jan 1991 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130000205 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |