1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to color pixel arrangements. Specifically the present invention relates to color pixel arrangements used in electronic imaging devices and displays.
2. The Prior Art
Full color perception is produced in the eye by three-color receptor nerve cell types called cones. The three types are sensitive to different wave lengths of light: long, medium, and short (“red”, “green”, and “blue” respectively). The relative density of the three differs significantly from one another. There are slightly more red receptors than green. There are very few blue receptors compared to red or green. In addition to the color receptors there are relative wavelength insensitive receptors called rods that contribute to monochrome night vision.
The human vision system processes the information detected by the eye in several perceptual channels; luminance, chromanance, and motion. Motion is only important for flicker threshold to the imaging system designer. The luminance channel takes the input from all of the available receptors, cones and rods. It is “color blind”. It processes the information in such a manner that the contrast of edges is enhanced. The chroma channel does not have edge contrast enhancement. Since the luminance channel uses and enhances every receptor, the resolution of the luminance channel is several times higher than the chroma channel. The blue receptor contribution to luminance perception is less than 5%, or one part in twenty. Thus the error introduced by lowering the blue resolution by one octave will be barely noticeable by the most perceptive viewer, if at all, as experiments at NASA, Ames Research Center (R. Martin, J. Gille, J. Larimer, Detectability of Reduced Blue Pixel Count in Projection Displays, SID Digest 1993) have demonstrated.
Color perception is influenced by a process called “assimilation” or the Von Bezold color blending effect. This is what allows separate color pixels (called “subpixels” by some authors) of a display to be perceived as the mixed color. This blending effect happens over a given angular distance in the field of view. Because of the relatively scarce blue receptors this blending happens over a greater angle for blue than for red or green. This distance is approximately 0.25° for blue, while for red or green it is approximately 0.12°. At a viewing distance of twelve inches, 0.25° subtends 50 mils (1,270μ) on a display. Thus, if the blue pixel pitch is less than half (625μ) of this blending pitch, the colors will blend without loss of picture quality.
The present state of the art color single plane imaging matrix, for flat panel displays and solid state camera chips is the RGB color triad. The system takes advantage of the Von Bezold effect by separating the three colors and placing equal spatial frequency weight on each color. Two manufacturers have shown improvements in display design by using dual or triple panels whose images are superimposed. One manufacturer of projection displays used three panels, red, green, and blue. The blue panel uses reduced resolution in accordance with the match between human vision requirements and the displayed image. Another manufacturer, Planar Systems of Beaverton, Oreg. employs a “Multi-row Adressing” technique having a dual electroluminescent panel, one panel with red and green pixels, the other with blue pixels to build a developmental model. The blue pixels have reduced resolution in the vertical axis only. This allows the blue phosphors to be excited at a higher rate than the red and green pixels, thus overcoming a problem with lower blue phosphor brightness. The problem with the prior art is that in providing the same matched resolution balance between human vision and display, additional display panels/planes are used, along with additional driver electronics.
Other display methods such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,008,868 issued Dec. 28, 1999 to Silverbrook use binary controlled emitters. In using binary controlled emitters, each emitter has a discrete luminance value, therefore, requiring the display to have an exact area to luminance relationship. This prior art used reduced blue “bit depth” built into the panel in accordance with human vision's lower blue color space increments. Conventional display methods also use a single color in a vertical stripe. Since conventional stripes have limited the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), high spatial frequency resolution, in the horizontal axis, stripes of a single color are non-optimal.
According to one aspect of the invention a three-color pixel element of spaced-apart emitters is disclosed. The pixel element consists of a blue emitter disposed at the center of a pair of opposing red and a pair of opposing green emitters. The plurality of pixel elements may be arranged in rows and columns to form a display. This array provides better perceived resolution and appearance of single full color displays by matching the human vision system.
According to another aspect of the invention, the drive matrix for the pixel array is disclosed. While the array consists of a plurality of rows and columns of the three-color pixel element of the present invention, the drive matrix consists of a plurality of row and column drivers to drive the individual emitters. The row drivers drive the red, green and blue emitters in each row, and the red and green emitters in each column are driven by a single column driver. However, a single column driver drives two columns of blue emitters. Thus, the number of drive lines and associated driver electronics used in the prior art are reduced in the present invention.
a and 1b are arrangements of a three-color pixel element of the present invention.
a is an arrangement of two three-color pixel elements of the present invention, aligned horizontally.
b is a diagram showing an illustrative drive matrix for the pixel arrangement of
Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description of the present invention is illustrative only and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons.
a shows an illustrative embodiment of an arrangement of a three-color pixel element 10 according to the present invention. The pixel element consists of a blue emitter 12, two red emitters 14, and two green emitters 16. The blue emitter 12 is disposed at the origin of a rectangular coordinate system having four quadrants, and the pair of red emitters 14, and the pair of green emitters 16 are disposed at opposing quadrants of the rectangular coordinate system. As shown in
Another illustrative embodiment of a three-color pixel element 20 according to the present invention is shown in
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the pixel has equal red, green and blue emitter area. This may be achieved by placing in the center of the pixel a blue emitter having an area larger than the areas of the individual red and green emitters. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that, in other embodiment of the present invention, the area of the blue emitter may be smaller in relation to either the red or green emitters. The blue emitter may be brighter than either the red or green emitters, or it may be the same brightness as the red and green emitters. For example, the drive-to-luminance gain of the blue emitter may be greater than that of the red or green emitters.
Although the above description is illustrative of a preferred embodiment of the present invention, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize other alternatives. For example, the emitters may have different shapes, such as rounded or polygonal. They may also be diffuse rather than having sharp edges. The pixels need not be arranged with equal spatial frequency in each axis. The aperture ratio between the emitters may be minimized to substantially non-existent or it may be very pronounced, and the space may also be different colors, including black or white. The emitters may be any technology known or invented in the future, such as displays using Liquid Crystal (LCD), Plasma, Thin Film Electroluminescent, Discrete Light Emitting Diode (LED), Polymer Light Emitting Diode, Electro-Chromic, Electro-Mechanical, Incandescent Bulb, or Field Emission excited phosphor (FED).
One advantage of the three-color pixel element array of the present invention is improved resolution of color displays. This occurs since only the red and green emitters contribute significantly to the perception of high resolution in the luminance channel. Thus reducing the number of blue emitters and replacing some with red and green emitters improves resolution by more closely matching human vision.
Dividing the red and green emitters in half in the vertical axis to increase spatial addressability is an improvement over the conventional vertical single color stripe of the prior art. An alternating “checkerboard” of red and green emitters allows the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), high spatial frequency resolution, to increase in both the horizontal and the vertical axes.
The three-color pixel element array may also be used in solid state image capture devices found in modern consumer video cameras and electronic still cameras. An advantage of using the reduced blue emitter resolution in both image capture and display is that stored images do not need to supply the same resolution for each color in storage or processing. This presents potential savings during coding, compression, and decompression of electronically stored images, including software and hardware in electronic imaging and display systems such as computers, video games, and television, including High Definition Television (HDTV) recording, playback, broadcasting, and display.
a is an arrangement 40 of two three-color pixel elements of the present invention aligned horizontally. A blue emitter 42a is disposed at the origin of a first three-color pixel element, and a blue emitter 42b is disposed at the origin of a second three-color pixel element. Red emitters 44a and 44b are disposed in the upper left corners of the first and second pixel elements. Green emitters 46a and 46b are disposed in the lower left corners of the first pixel and second pixel elements. Green emitters 48a and 48b are disposed in the upper right corners of each pixel element, and red emitters 50a and 50b are disposed in the lower right corners of each pixel element.
b is a diagram of an illustrative drive matrix 60, according to the present invention, for the pixel arrangement 40. The emitters are schematically represented as capacitors for convenience. The emitters of the invention may be active electronic devices such as Thin Film Transistors (TFT) found in Active Matrix Liquid Crystal Display (AMLCD), or Charge Coupled Devices as found in camera chips, or other suitable devices.
The illustrative drive matrix 60 shown in
The row drivers of the present invention drive the red, green and blue emitters in each row. Row driver 72 drives red emitters 44a and 44b, green emitters 48a and 48b, as well as blue emitter 42b. Row driver 74 drives green emitters 46a and 46b, red emitters 50a and 50b and blue emitter 42a. Each emitter can be driven at continuous luminance values at specific locations in a pixel, unlike emitters in the prior art, which are driven at discrete luminance values at random locations in a pixel.
The drive matrix disclosed in the present invention uses approximately 16% fewer column drivers to present a given image than does a prior art 2×6 drive matrix for the triad arrangement. The column drive lines are reduced since the blue emitters 12 are combined. This entire arrangement can be turned 90 degrees such that the combined blue emitters 12 are driven by the same row driver. All such topologically identical variants known in the art are possible embodiments of this invention. In addition, the driver type, voltage, and timing can be the same as already known in the art for each device technology.
While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications than mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3971065 | Bayer | Jul 1976 | A |
4353062 | Lorteije et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4593978 | Mourey et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4642619 | Togashi | Feb 1987 | A |
4651148 | Takeda et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4751535 | Myers | Jun 1988 | A |
4773737 | Yokono et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4786964 | Plummer et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4792728 | Chang et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800375 | Silverstein et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4822142 | Yasui | Apr 1989 | A |
4853592 | Strathman | Aug 1989 | A |
4874986 | Menn et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4886343 | Johnson | Dec 1989 | A |
4908609 | Stroomer | Mar 1990 | A |
4920409 | Yamagishi | Apr 1990 | A |
4965565 | Noguchi | Oct 1990 | A |
4966441 | Conner | Oct 1990 | A |
4967264 | Parulski et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5006840 | Hamada et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5052785 | Takimoto et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5113274 | Takahashi et al. | May 1992 | A |
5132674 | Bottorf | Jul 1992 | A |
5144288 | Hamada et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5184114 | Brown | Feb 1993 | A |
5189404 | Masimo et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5233385 | Sampsell | Aug 1993 | A |
5311337 | McCartney, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5315418 | Sprague et al. | May 1994 | A |
5334996 | Tanigaki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341153 | Benzschawel et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5398066 | Martinez-Uriegas et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5436747 | Suzuki | Jul 1995 | A |
5461503 | Deffontaines et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5535028 | Bae et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541653 | Peters et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5561460 | Katoh et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563621 | Silsby | Oct 1996 | A |
5579027 | Sakurai et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5642176 | Abukawa et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646702 | Akinwande et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648793 | Chen | Jul 1997 | A |
5661371 | Salerno et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5729244 | Lockwood | Mar 1998 | A |
5754226 | Yamada et al. | May 1998 | A |
5773927 | Zimlich | Jun 1998 | A |
5792579 | Phillips | Aug 1998 | A |
5815101 | Fonte | Sep 1998 | A |
5821913 | Mamiya | Oct 1998 | A |
5856050 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5899550 | Masaki | May 1999 | A |
5949496 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
5973664 | Badger | Oct 1999 | A |
6002446 | Eglit | Dec 1999 | A |
6005692 | Stahl | Dec 1999 | A |
6008868 | Silverbrook | Dec 1999 | A |
6034666 | Kanai et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037719 | Yap et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038031 | Murphy | Mar 2000 | A |
6049626 | Kim | Apr 2000 | A |
6061533 | Kajiwara | May 2000 | A |
6064363 | Kwon | May 2000 | A |
6072272 | Rumbaugh | Jun 2000 | A |
6097367 | Kuriwaki et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108122 | Ulrich et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6137100 | Fossum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144352 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147664 | Hansen | Nov 2000 | A |
6151001 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160535 | Park | Dec 2000 | A |
6163038 | Chen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6184903 | Omori | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188385 | Hill et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198507 | Ishigami | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219025 | Hill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225967 | Hebiguchi | May 2001 | B1 |
6225973 | Hill et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236390 | Hitchcock | May 2001 | B1 |
6239783 | Hill et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243055 | Fergason | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243070 | Hill et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262710 | Smith | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271891 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299329 | Mui et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326981 | Mori et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327008 | Fujiyoshi | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346972 | Kim | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360023 | Betrisey et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377262 | Hitchcock et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392717 | Kunzman | May 2002 | B1 |
6393145 | Betrisey et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6429867 | Deering | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441867 | Daly | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453067 | Morgan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459419 | Matsubayashi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466618 | Messing et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469756 | Booth, Jr. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486923 | Maeshima et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6628068 | Rorison et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6661429 | Phan | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6680761 | Greene et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6903754 | Brown Elliott | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6950115 | Brown Elliott | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950156 | Yoshida | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7110012 | Messing et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20010017515 | Kusunoki et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010040645 | Yamazaki | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012071 | Sun | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015110 | Brown | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020017645 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020122160 | Kunzman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140831 | Hayashi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020180688 | Drzaic et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020190648 | Bechtel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030011613 | Booth, Jr. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043567 | Hoelen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071826 | Goertzen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071943 | Choo et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090581 | Credelle et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030117423 | Brown Elliott et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030218618 | Phan | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040061710 | Messing et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050174363 | Brown Elliott | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050248262 | Brown Elliott | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264588 | Brown Elliott | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
299 09 537 | Oct 1999 | DE |
199 23 527 | Nov 2000 | DE |
199 23 527 | Nov 2000 | DE |
201 09 354 | Sep 2001 | DE |
0 158 366 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 203 005 | Nov 1986 | EP |
0 322 106 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0 671 650 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 878 969 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 793 214 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 812 114 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0 899 604 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1083539 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 261 014 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1 381 020 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2 133 912 | Aug 1984 | GB |
2 146 478 | Apr 1985 | GB |
60-107022 | Jun 1985 | JP |
02-000826 | Jan 1990 | JP |
03-78390 | Apr 1991 | JP |
3-36239 | May 1991 | JP |
06-102503 | Apr 1994 | JP |
02-983027 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2001203919 | Jul 2001 | JP |
WO9723860 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 0021067 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0042564 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0042762 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0045365 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0065432 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0067196 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0070392 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0110112 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0129817 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0152546 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 02059685 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03014819 | Feb 2003 | WO |