Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to chip fuses and, more particularly, to improving I2t and breaking capacity characteristics of chip fuses.
Chip fuses feature a conductive fuse element that is typically deposited as a thick-film, electroplated, or thin-film layer onto a substrate material (e.g., ceramic, glass, or other). Chip fuses can provide overcurrent protection in small surface mount technology (SMT) packages, such as 1206, 0603, and 0402 SMT packages as defined by Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA) standards.
I2t is an expression of the available thermal energy resulting from current flow. With regard to fuses, the term is usually expressed as melting, arcing, and total clearing I2t. The units for I2t are expressed in ampere-squared-seconds [A2s]. Melting I2t: the thermal energy required to melt a specific fuse element. Arcing I2t: the thermal energy passed by a fuse during the arcing time. The magnitude of arcing I2t is a function of the available voltage and stored energy in the circuit. Total clearing I2t: the thermal energy through the fuse from overcurrent inception until current is completely interrupted. Total clearing I2t=(melting I2t)+(arcing I2t). I2t has two important applications to fuse selection. The first is pulse cycle withstand capability and the second is selective coordination. Interrupting rating (also known as breaking capacity or short circuit rating) is the maximum current which the fuse can safely interrupt at the rated voltage.
For most fuses, breaking capacities have an inverse correlation to I2t—increasing cross sectional area to attain high I2t creates too much mass for the fuse to pass high breaking capacities, or vice-versa. The challenge from a design perspective has always been to find the balance between the two fuse characteristics, while still meeting all the other electrical and dimensional requirements.
It is with respect to these and other considerations that the present improvements may be useful.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
An exemplary embodiment of a chip fuse in accordance with the present disclosure may include two terminals and a fuse element array. The first terminal is located on one end of the fuse element array while the second terminal is located on a second, opposite end of the fuse element array. The fuse element array includes multiple layers in a stacking arrangement with one another. Each of the multiple layers include two terminal portions and two fuse element portions. The first terminal portion is seated within in the first terminal and the second terminal portion is seated within in the second terminal. The first fuse element portion is perpendicular to and extending between the two terminal portions. The second fuse element portion is perpendicular to and extending between the two terminal portions. The first fuse element portion is adjacent the second fuse element portion.
Another exemplary embodiment of a chip fuse in accordance with the present disclosure may include multiple substrate layers and multiple fuse element layers. Each fuse element layer is sandwiched between two substrate layers. Each layer has two fuse element portions. The first fuse element portion connects between a first terminal and a second terminal. The second fuse element portion also connects between the first terminal and the second terminal. The first fuse element portion is parallel to the second fuse element portion.
A chip fuse is disclosed herein with arrayed elements. A fuse element array features one or more fuse elements, each of which is sandwiched between a substrate. Each fuse element consists of at least two fuse element portions disposed between terminals. The fuse element portions are thinner and narrower than those of legacy chip fuses having a single fuse element portion between terminals. As a result, when the chip fuse element ruptures, a larger proportion of energy is distributed along the sides of the component package rather than the top of the package. Further, the chip fuse is characterized as having higher Ft and breaking capacities than a comparable legacy chip fuse.
For the sake of convenience and clarity, terms such as “top”, “bottom”, “upper”, “lower”, “vertical”, “horizontal”, “lateral”, “transverse”, “radial”, “inner”, “outer”, “left”, and “right” may be used herein to describe the relative placement and orientation of the features and components, each with respect to the geometry and orientation of other features and components appearing in the perspective, exploded perspective, and cross-sectional views provided herein. Said terminology is not intended to be limiting and includes the words specifically mentioned, derivatives therein, and words of similar import.
As shown in
There are drawbacks to the design of the single-fuse element chip fuse 100. By having a single fuse element portion 110 in each of the fuse element layers 104, a relatively large proportion of energy during an overcurrent or overtemperature event distributes in an upward direction rather than along the sides of the package.
As shown in
Because it features a matrix of fuse element layers 304 that utilize a pair of fuse elements (fuse element portions 310), the chip fuse 300 may also be referred to herein as a dual-fuse element chip fuse 300. In exemplary embodiments, the chip fuse 300 includes thinner and narrower fuse element portions 310, as compared to the fuse element portion 110 of the chip fuse 100, arranged in a matrix along multiple layers of substrates.
When a fuse ruptures, there is an arc that occurs and a debris path of material is left inside the fuse cavity, which may be burned element carbonized components, and so on. One of the objectives of fuse design is to ensure that, when the fuse blows, the debris path that is formed does not allow re-arcing to occur. In exemplary embodiments, by splitting the fuse element layers 304 into two thinner, narrower fuse elements, relative to the fuse element layers 104, the debris path is to the sides of the package 306 rather than above the package, as with the chip fuse 100 (see, e.g.,
In exemplary embodiments, each fuse element layer 304 has a determined geometry and orientation. This means the width of each fuse element and the spacing between each fuse element are carefully considered. Element thickness is also a consideration, as thickness also contributes to the overall mass. Also, part of the determined geometry and orientation are the electrical requirements of the chip fuse 300, and, to the extent possible, ensuring that the fuse package stays intact during the short circuit event.
In contrast to the single-fuse element chip fuse 100, the dual-fuse element chip fuse 300 provides a benefit, namely in helping to distribute energy to the sides of the package 306 rather than through the top of the package.
The chip fuse 300 thus features a design with elements arranged in a matrix along multiple layers of substrates. Although five fuse element layers 304 are shown in
In addition to varying the number of fuse element layers 304, the number of fuse elements of each fuse element layer are varied, in exemplary embodiments, to achieve even better I2t characteristics and breaking capacities, in exemplary embodiments. A chip fuse having three fuse elements for each fuse element layer (triple-fuse element chip fuse), four fuse elements for each fuse element layer (quadruple-fuse element chip fuse), and so on, are also possible, as the number of fuse elements and the number of layers of the fuse element are subject to the size limitations of the chip packaging and the desired rating for the fuse.
Further, in exemplary embodiments, the chip fuse 300 includes LTCC intermediate layers 504a, 504b, 504c, 504d, and 504e (collectively, “LTCC intermediate layers 504”). The LTCC covers 502 and the LTCC intermediate layers 504 constitute the “layers of substrates”, or “ceramic layers” referred to herein as part of the chip fuse 300. In exemplary embodiments, the LTCC covers 502 and LTCC intermediate layers 504 are sized to provide a protective layer between each fuse element layer 304. Thus, the LTCC covers 502 and LTCC intermediate layers 504 have dimensions that are at least as large, and may be slightly larger, than the dimensions of the fuse element layers 304. In
In exemplary embodiments, the elements of the chip fuse 300, as viewed in
Once the arrangement of LTCC cover layers 502, fuse element layers 304, and LTCC intermediate layers 504 shown in
In
In
In
In
Many variations of the dimensions shown in
Further, the spacing between fuse element portions may vary. If fuse element 704b is designed to be symmetrical, then distance d1 would equal distance d2, although distance d3 may be different. However, the fuse element 704b may be asymmetrical, to satisfy the determined geometry and orientation of the fuse element. For the fuse element 704c, the distances between fuse element portions 710c may be the same, e.g., d4=d5=d6=d7, or d4=d7 and d5=d6 but d4≠d5, as two examples of a symmetrical arrangement. Or the fuse element 704c may be asymmetrical, with d4≠d5≠d6≠d7. The determined geometry and orientation of the fuse element, whether dual-fuse element portion, triple-fuse element portion, quadruple-fuse element portion, and n-fuse element portion, for integer n, may vary.
In exemplary embodiments, the thickness of the fuse element portions may also be varied, with a quadruple-fuse element fuse element having thinner fuse elements than a dual-fuse element fuse element. It may be the case that the same volume of electrically conductive material is used to manufacture the quadruple-fuse element fuse element as the dual-fuse element fuse element. Thus, the fuse element portions of the quadruple-fuse element fuse element may be both thinner in terms of width and thickness than the fuse element portions of the dual-fuse element fuse element.
Terminal portions 708a and 708b of the dual-fuse element fuse element 704b are shown in
For a single-fuse element chip fuse such as the chip fuse 100, by adding multiple fuse elements to the fuse in an array, there is an exponential correlation (an example given as y=5x2 for one specific design). This one example correlation was empirically determined. However, there may be many different correlations, depending on the specific fuse design. For the dual-fuse element chip fuse such as the chip fuse 300, the I2t value is almost doubled, from 5x2 to 9x2. Thus, there is an exponential relationship between the number of stacks and the I2t value. In exemplary embodiments, the I2t value continues to increase with a triple-fuse element chip fuse, a quadruple-fuse element chip fuse, and so on. Having the layers stacked vertically also exponentially increases I2t, together with fuse rating, in exemplary embodiments.
Further, in exemplary embodiments, although the I2t values increase with the use of a higher number of thinner and narrower fuse elements arranged in a matrix along multiple layers of substrates, there is not a diminution in breaking capacity. Thus, by controlling the geometry and orientation of each element fuse element for each layer, the design allows the fuse to achieve both high I2t values and high breaking capacities. Having a fuse element geometry with a reduced cross-sectional area translates to less energy required to cut off the electrical connection, giving the n-fuse element chip fuse fast-acting properties, relative to single-fuse element chip fuses.
The n-fuse element chip fuse also reimagines parallel mounting of lower rating fuses by condensing them into a single fuse package, resulting in a reliable fuse package with defined resistance limits and dimensional controls for each layer, instead of having the user manually sort individual lower rating fuses with similar resistances.
Table 1 provides another comparison between the 1×5 array of the chip fuse 100 versus the 2×5 array of the chip fuse 300, according to exemplary embodiments. The design of each chip fuse starts with a 250 A@24 VDC requirement for the short circuit, shown in the second column. For the 1×5 array (chip fuse 100), the body ruptures while, for the 2×5 array (chip fuse 300), the short circuit results in sparks and vents until 360 A@24 VDC, which is an improvement over the 1×5 array (sparks and vents are an acceptable result while body rupture is not). Further, the I2t value, at 175 A2s@1 msec, is higher for the 2×5 array than for the 1×5 array, which is 138 A2s@1 msec, as shown in the third column of Table 1.
Most fuses have one or multiple specified opening time limits at specified overcurrent conditions (or overload gates, as commonly called), a basic requirement. A 250% overload gate is equivalent to 2.5 times the rated current of the fuse. The 1×5 array and 2×5 array are specified to open to five seconds maximum only. For the 2×5 array, there is a slight increase in opening time, 0.7 seconds, over the 1×5 array, which has an opening time of 0.5 seconds, where In is the rated current. Both values are well within the overload specification.
As used herein, an element or step recited in the singular and proceeded with the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding plural elements or steps, unless such exclusion is explicitly recited. Furthermore, references to “one embodiment” of the present disclosure are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features.
While the present disclosure makes reference to certain embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present disclosure, as defined in the appended claim(s). Accordingly, it is intended that the present disclosure not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it has the full scope defined by the language of the following claims, and equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5479147 | Montgomery | Dec 1995 | A |
5726621 | Whitney | Mar 1998 | A |
6034589 | Montgomery | Mar 2000 | A |
7304366 | Wu | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20040190269 | Makaran | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050141164 | Bender | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070120232 | Greco | May 2007 | A1 |
20090102595 | Pachla | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20150200067 | Spaldon-Stewart | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160005561 | Enriquez | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for the EP Application No. 23170903.1, dated Sep. 27, 2023, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230377827 A1 | Nov 2023 | US |